Immune Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccines

A special issue of Vaccines (ISSN 2076-393X). This special issue belongs to the section "COVID-19 Vaccines and Vaccination".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 April 2024) | Viewed by 17654

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Setor Litoral, Universidade Federal do Parana, Curitiba, Brazil
Interests: COVID-19 serology; COVID-19 immune response

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The COVID-19 pandemic has created a global health crisis, with devastating consequences for human lives and economies worldwide. The rapid development of vaccines against COVID-19 has been a crucial step in mitigating the impact of the pandemic.

Understanding the immune response to COVID-19 vaccines is crucial to ensure their effectiveness in preventing infection and reducing the spread of the virus, particularly in light of emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern. The knowledge of the immune response to the developed and under-developed vaccines can help to improve vaccine formulation in the future, as well as guide the most effective vaccination programs. This research area has significant implications for public health policy, including vaccine distribution and vaccine hesitancy.

This Special Issue article series provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of knowledge on the immune response to COVID-19 vaccines. The articles cover topics such as vaccine efficacy and safety, immune responses in specific populations, and the potential impact of emerging viral variants on vaccine effectiveness. By gathering the latest research in this area, this series aims to provide a valuable resource for scientists, clinicians, and policymakers in the ongoing fight against the COVID-19 pandemic.

We are pleased to invite you to submit your research to this Special Issue. Original research articles and reviews are welcome. Research areas may include (but are not limited to) the following:

  • The immune response to novel COVID-19 under development.
  • Populational studies covering the immune response to COVID-19 vaccines.
  • Long-term immune response to COVID-19 vaccination.
  • Relation between immune response and COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness.
  • Breakthrough infections in the COVID-19 vaccinated population.
  • Study of cases covering COVID-19 immune response to vaccination and infection.

I look forward to receiving your contributions.

Prof. Dr. Luciano Fernandes Huergo
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Vaccines is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • COVID-19
  • SARS-CoV-2
  • immune response
  • vaccines
  • long immunity
  • infection
  • IgG levels

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (11 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review, Other

16 pages, 6013 KiB  
Article
COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness Studies against Symptomatic and Severe Outcomes during the Omicron Period in Four Countries in the Eastern Mediterranean Region
by Manuela Runge, Zahra Karimian, Mehrnaz Kheirandish, Giulio Borghi, Natalie Wodniak, Kamal Fahmy, Carsten Mantel, Thomas Cherian, Zeinab Nabil Ahmed Said, Farid Najafi, Fatima Thneibat, Zia Ul-Haq, Sheraz Fazid, Iman Ibrahim Salama, Fatemeh Khosravi Shadmani, Ahmad Alrawashdeh, Shadrokh Sirous, Saverio Bellizzi, Amira Ahmed, Michael Lukwiya, Arash Rashidian and on behalf of the Consortium of Authorsadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Vaccines 2024, 12(8), 906; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12080906 - 10 Aug 2024
Viewed by 1203
Abstract
Vaccine effectiveness (VE) studies provide real-world evidence to monitor vaccine performance and inform policy. The WHO Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean supported a regional study to assess the VE of COVID-19 vaccines against different clinical outcomes in four countries between June 2021 [...] Read more.
Vaccine effectiveness (VE) studies provide real-world evidence to monitor vaccine performance and inform policy. The WHO Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean supported a regional study to assess the VE of COVID-19 vaccines against different clinical outcomes in four countries between June 2021 and August 2023. Health worker cohort studies were conducted in 2707 health workers in Egypt and Pakistan, of whom 171 experienced symptomatic laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Test-negative design case–control studies were conducted in Iran and Jordan in 4017 severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) patients (2347 controls and 1670 cases) during the Omicron variant dominant period. VE estimates were calculated for each study and pooled by study design for several vaccine types (BBIBP-CorV, AZD1222, BNT162b2, and mRNA-1273, among others). Among health workers, VE against symptomatic infection of a complete primary series could only be computed compared to partial vaccination, suggesting a benefit of providing an additional dose of mRNA vaccines (VE: 88.9%, 95%CI: 15.3–98.6%), while results were inconclusive for other vaccine products. Among SARI patients, VE against hospitalization of a complete primary series with any vaccine compared to non-vaccinated was 20.9% (95%CI: 4.5–34.5%). Effectiveness estimates for individual vaccines, booster doses, and secondary outcomes (intensive care unit admission and death) were inconclusive. Future VE studies will need to address challenges in both design and analysis when conducted late during a pandemic and will be able to utilize the strengthened capacities in countries. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Immune Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccines)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 2787 KiB  
Article
A Unique mRNA Vaccine Elicits Protective Efficacy against the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant and SARS-CoV
by Xiaoqing Guan, Abhishek K. Verma, Gang Wang, Abhijeet Roy, Stanley Perlman and Lanying Du
Vaccines 2024, 12(6), 605; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12060605 - 1 Jun 2024
Viewed by 1297
Abstract
The highly pathogenic coronaviruses SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV have led to the COVID-19 pandemic and SARS outbreak, respectively. The receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the spike (S) protein of SARS-CoV-2, particularly the Omicron variant, has frequent mutations, resulting in the reduced efficiency of current COVID-19 [...] Read more.
The highly pathogenic coronaviruses SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV have led to the COVID-19 pandemic and SARS outbreak, respectively. The receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the spike (S) protein of SARS-CoV-2, particularly the Omicron variant, has frequent mutations, resulting in the reduced efficiency of current COVID-19 vaccines against new variants. Here, we designed two lipid nanoparticle-encapsulated mRNA vaccines by deleting the mutant RBD of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant (SARS2-S (RBD-del)) or by replacing this mutant RBD with the conserved and potent RBD of SARS-CoV (SARS2-S (SARS-RBD)). Both mRNA vaccines were stable at various temperatures for different time periods. Unlike SARS2-S (RBD-del) mRNA, SARS2-S (SARS-RBD) mRNA elicited effective T-cell responses and potent antibodies specific to both SARS-CoV-2 S and SARS-CoV RBD proteins. It induced strong neutralizing antibodies against pseudotyped SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV infections and protected immunized mice from the challenge of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant and SARS-CoV by significantly reducing the viral titers in the lungs after Omicron challenge and by completely preventing SARS-CoV-induced weight loss and death. SARS2-S (SARS-RBD)-immunized serum antibodies protected naïve mice from the SARS-CoV challenge, with its protective efficacy positively correlating with the neutralizing antibody titers. These findings indicate that this mRNA vaccine has the potential for development as an effective vaccine against current and future SARS-CoV-2 variants and SARS-CoV. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Immune Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccines)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 570 KiB  
Article
The Limitations of a Hypothetical All-Variant COVID-19 Vaccine: A Simulation Study
by Robert J. Kosinski
Vaccines 2024, 12(5), 532; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12050532 - 13 May 2024
Viewed by 868
Abstract
This paper simulates a hypothetical pan-coronavirus vaccine that confers immediate sterilizing immunity against all SARS-CoV-2 variants. Simulations used a SEIIS (susceptible, exposed, infective, immune, susceptible) spreadsheet model that ran two parallel subpopulations: one that accepted vaccination and another that refused it. The two [...] Read more.
This paper simulates a hypothetical pan-coronavirus vaccine that confers immediate sterilizing immunity against all SARS-CoV-2 variants. Simulations used a SEIIS (susceptible, exposed, infective, immune, susceptible) spreadsheet model that ran two parallel subpopulations: one that accepted vaccination and another that refused it. The two subpopulations could transmit infections to one another. Using data from the United States (US), the simulated vaccine was tested against limiting factors such as vaccine hesitancy, slow vaccination distribution, and the development of high-transmission variants. The vaccine was often successful at reducing cases, but high-transmission variants and discontinuation of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) such as masking greatly elevated cases. A puzzling outcome was that if NPIs were discontinued and high-transmission variants became common, the model predicted consistently higher rates of disease than are actually observed in the US in 2024. However, if cumulative exposure to virus antigens increased the duration of immunity or decreased the infectivity of the virus, the model predictions were brought back into a more realistic range. The major finding was that even when a COVID-19 vaccine always produces sterilizing immunity against every SARS-CoV-2 variant, its ability to control the epidemic can be compromised by multiple common conditions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Immune Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccines)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1551 KiB  
Article
Comparative Analysis of Vaccine-Induced Neutralizing Antibodies against the Alpha, Beta, Delta, and Omicron Variants of SARS-CoV-2
by Philipp Girl, Heiner von Buttlar, Enrico Mantel, Markus H. Antwerpen, Roman Wölfel and Katharina Müller
Vaccines 2024, 12(5), 515; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12050515 - 9 May 2024
Viewed by 1161
Abstract
The SARS-CoV-2 virus has infected more than 660 million people and caused nearly seven million deaths worldwide. During the pandemic, a number of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were rapidly developed, and several are currently licensed for use in Europe. However, the optimization of vaccination regimens [...] Read more.
The SARS-CoV-2 virus has infected more than 660 million people and caused nearly seven million deaths worldwide. During the pandemic, a number of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were rapidly developed, and several are currently licensed for use in Europe. However, the optimization of vaccination regimens is still ongoing, particularly with regard to booster vaccinations. At the same time, the emergence of new virus variants poses an ongoing challenge to vaccine efficacy. In this study, we focused on a comparative analysis of the neutralization capacity of vaccine-induced antibodies against four different variants of concern (i.e., Alpha, Beta, Delta, and Omicron) after two and three doses of COVID-19 vaccine. We were able to show that both two (prime/boost) and three (prime/boost/boost) vaccinations elicit highly variable levels of neutralizing antibodies. In addition, we did not observe a significant difference in antibody levels after two and three vaccinations. We also observed a significant decrease in the neutralization susceptibility of all but one SARS-CoV-2 variants to vaccine-induced antibodies. In contrast, a SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infection between the second and third vaccination results in overall higher levels of neutralizing antibodies with a concomitant improved neutralization of all virus variants. Titer levels remained highly variable across the cohort but a common trend was observed. This may be due to the fact that at the time of this study, all licensed vaccines were still based exclusively on wild-type SARS-CoV-2, whereas infections were caused by virus variants. Overall, our data demonstrate the importance of (booster) vaccinations, but at the same time emphasize the need for the continued adaptation of vaccines to induce a protective immune response against virus variants in order to be prepared for future (seasonal) SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Immune Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccines)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 5294 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of the Abdala Vaccine: Antibody and Cellular Response to the RBD Domain of SARS-CoV-2
by Lorenzo Islas-Vazquez, Yan Carlos Alvarado-Alvarado, Marisa Cruz-Aguilar, Henry Velazquez-Soto, Eduardo Villalobos-Gonzalez, Gloria Ornelas-Hall, Sonia Mayra Perez-Tapia and Maria C. Jimenez-Martinez
Vaccines 2023, 11(12), 1787; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11121787 - 30 Nov 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2616
Abstract
Abdala is a recently released RBD protein subunit vaccine against SARS-CoV-2. A few countries, including Mexico, have adopted Abdala as a booster dose in their COVID-19 vaccination schemes. Despite that, most of the Mexican population has received full-scheme vaccination with platforms other than [...] Read more.
Abdala is a recently released RBD protein subunit vaccine against SARS-CoV-2. A few countries, including Mexico, have adopted Abdala as a booster dose in their COVID-19 vaccination schemes. Despite that, most of the Mexican population has received full-scheme vaccination with platforms other than Abdala; little is known regarding Abdala’s immunological features, such as its antibody production and T- and B-cell-specific response induction. This work aimed to study antibody production and the adaptive cellular response in the Mexican population that received the Abdala vaccine as a booster. We recruited 25 volunteers and evaluated their RBD-specific antibody production, T- and B-cell-activating profiles, and cytokine production. Our results showed that the Abdala vaccine increases the concentration of RBD IgG-specific antibodies. Regarding the cellular response, after challenging peripheral blood cultures with RBD, the plasmablast (CD19+CD27+CD38High) and transitional B-cell (CD19+CD21+CD38High) percentages increased significantly, while T cells showed an increased activated phenotype (CD3+CD4+CD25+CD69+ and CD3+CD4+CD25+HLA-DR+). Also, IL-2 and IFN-γ increased significantly in the supernatant of the RBD-stimulated cells. Our results suggest that Abdala vaccination, used as a booster, evokes antibody production and the activation of previously generated memory against the SARS-CoV-2 RBD domain. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Immune Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccines)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

14 pages, 2392 KiB  
Article
Profile and Outcomes of Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients during the Prevalence of the Omicron Variant According to the Brazilian Regions: A Retrospective Cohort Study from 2022
by Pedro Dutra Drummond, Daniel Bortot de Salles, Natália Satchiko Hojo de Souza, Daniela Carine Ramires Oliveira, Daniel Ludovico Guidoni and Fernanda Sumika Hojo de Souza
Vaccines 2023, 11(10), 1568; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11101568 - 5 Oct 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1071
Abstract
We investigated the clinical–epidemiological profile and outcomes of COVID-19 patients hospitalized in 2022, during the Omicron variant/subvariant prevalence, in different Brazilian regions to identify the most vulnerable subgroups requiring special attention. Data from COVID-19 patients were extracted from the national Information System for [...] Read more.
We investigated the clinical–epidemiological profile and outcomes of COVID-19 patients hospitalized in 2022, during the Omicron variant/subvariant prevalence, in different Brazilian regions to identify the most vulnerable subgroups requiring special attention. Data from COVID-19 patients were extracted from the national Information System for Epidemiological Surveillance of Influenza (SIVEP-Gripe database), and analyses stratified by region and age group were conducted. The constructed dataset encompassed clinical–epidemiological information, intensive care unit admission, invasive and non-invasive ventilation requirements, vaccination status, and evolution (cure or death). It was observed that there were significant differences in the vaccination rates between regions, in the occurrence of unfavorable outcomes, and in the pattern of comorbidities in young patients. The north region had higher rates of unvaccinated patients and a lower percentage of those vaccinated with three doses in all age groups compared to other regions. The northeast region had the highest rates of patients admitted to the ICU for all age groups, while the north and northeast were the most affected by IMV requirements and in-hospital death in all age groups. This study showed that extended vaccination coverage, especially booster doses, can protect different population segments from developing severe disease since lower vaccination coverage was observed in regions with higher fatality rates. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Immune Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccines)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1132 KiB  
Article
Determinants of Anti-S Immune Response at 12 Months after SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in a Multicentric European Cohort of Healthcare Workers—ORCHESTRA Project
by Ludovica Leomanni, Giulia Collatuzzo, Emanuele Sansone, Emma Sala, Giuseppe De Palma, Stefano Porru, Gianluca Spiteri, Maria Grazia Lourdes Monaco, Daniela Basso, Sofia Pavanello, Maria Luisa Scapellato, Francesca Larese Filon, Luca Cegolon, Marcella Mauro, Vittorio Lodi, Tiziana Lazzarotto, Ivan Noreña, Christina Reinkemeyer, Le Thi Thu Giang, Eleonóra Fabiánová, Jozef Strhársky, Marco Dell’Omo, Nicola Murgia, Lucía A. Carrasco-Ribelles, Concepción Violán, Dana Mates, Agripina Rascu, Luigi Vimercati, Luigi De Maria, Shuffield S. Asafo, Giorgia Ditano, Mahsa Abedini and Paolo Boffettaadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Vaccines 2023, 11(10), 1527; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11101527 - 26 Sep 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1967
Abstract
Background: The effectiveness of the immunity provided by SARS-CoV-2 vaccines is an important public health issue. We analyzed the determinants of 12-month serology in a multicenter European cohort of vaccinated healthcare workers (HCW). Methods: We analyzed the sociodemographic characteristics and levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 [...] Read more.
Background: The effectiveness of the immunity provided by SARS-CoV-2 vaccines is an important public health issue. We analyzed the determinants of 12-month serology in a multicenter European cohort of vaccinated healthcare workers (HCW). Methods: We analyzed the sociodemographic characteristics and levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies (IgG) in a cohort of 16,101 vaccinated HCW from eleven centers in Germany, Italy, Romania, Slovakia and Spain. Considering the skewness of the distribution, the serological levels were transformed using log or cubic standardization and normalized by dividing them by center-specific standard errors. We fitted center-specific multivariate regression models to estimate the cohort-specific relative risks (RR) of an increase of one standard deviation of log or cubic antibody level and the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) for different factors and combined them in random-effects meta-analyses. Results: We included 16,101 HCW in the analysis. A high antibody level was positively associated with age (RR = 1.04, 95% CI = 1.00–1.08 per 10-year increase), previous infection (RR = 1.78, 95% CI 1.29–2.45) and use of Spikevax [Moderna] with combinations compared to Comirnaty [BioNTech/Pfizer] (RR = 1.07, 95% CI 0.97–1.19) and was negatively associated with the time since last vaccine (RR = 0.94, 95% CI 0.91–0.98 per 30-day increase). Conclusions: These results provide insight about vaccine-induced immunity to SARS-CoV-2, an analysis of its determinants and quantification of the antibody decay trend with time since vaccination. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Immune Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccines)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1821 KiB  
Article
Effectiveness of Mix-and-Match Vaccination in Preventing SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant Infection in Taiwan: A Test-Negative Control Study
by Yu-Tung Huang, Yi-Ching Chen, Chih-Hsien Chuang, Shang-Hung Chang and Cheng-Hsun Chiu
Vaccines 2023, 11(9), 1441; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11091441 - 31 Aug 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2405
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness (VE) of mix-and-match vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant infection and severe outcomes. An SARS-CoV-2 PCR-confirmed retrospective cohort from Chang Gung Medical System in Taiwan was constructed. Vaccination records were tracked from the National Immunization Information System [...] Read more.
This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness (VE) of mix-and-match vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant infection and severe outcomes. An SARS-CoV-2 PCR-confirmed retrospective cohort from Chang Gung Medical System in Taiwan was constructed. Vaccination records were tracked from the National Immunization Information System and categorized by different regimens or unvaccinated status. The main outcomes are VE against PCR-confirmed infection and COVID-19-associated moderate to severe disease. Participants were observed during the Omicron wave from March to August 2022. Of 298,737 PCR testing results available, 162,219 were eligible for analysis. VE against infection was modest, ranging from 38.3% to 49.0%, while mRNA-based vaccine regimens revealed better protection against moderate to severe disease, ranging from 80.8% to 90.3%. Subgroup analysis revealed lower VE among persons with major illness in preventing moderate to severe disease. For young adults, the VE of protein-based vaccine regimens showed a comparable protection with other mixed vaccine regimens. The mix-and-match vaccination strategy provided modest clinical effectiveness in preventing Omicron variant infection. mRNA vaccine-based regimens were superior to other regimens against moderate to severe disease especially in older adults. The mix-and-match vaccination strategy could be an alternative to prevent COVID-19 in unstable vaccine supply regions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Immune Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccines)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 3865 KiB  
Article
Phenotypic Changes in T and NK Cells Induced by Sputnik V Vaccination
by Anna A. Boyko, Maria O. Ustiuzhanina, Julia D. Vavilova, Maria A. Streltsova, Sofya A. Kust, Andrei E. Siniavin, Irina V. Astrakhantseva, Marina S. Drutskaya and Elena I. Kovalenko
Vaccines 2023, 11(6), 1047; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11061047 - 31 May 2023
Viewed by 1691
Abstract
A highly effective humoral immune response induced by the Sputnik V vaccine was demonstrated in independent studies, as well as in large-scale post-vaccination follow-up studies. However, the shifts in the cell-mediated immunity induced by Sputnik V vaccination are still under investigation. This study [...] Read more.
A highly effective humoral immune response induced by the Sputnik V vaccine was demonstrated in independent studies, as well as in large-scale post-vaccination follow-up studies. However, the shifts in the cell-mediated immunity induced by Sputnik V vaccination are still under investigation. This study was aimed at estimating the impact of Sputnik V on activating and inhibitory receptors, activation and proliferative senescence markers in NK and T lymphocytes. The effects of Sputnik V were evaluated by the comparison of PBMC samples prior to vaccination, and then three days and three weeks following the second (boost) dose. The prime-boost format of Sputnik V vaccination induced a contraction in the T cell fraction of senescent CD57+ cells and a decrease in HLA-DR-expressing T cells. The proportion of NKG2A+ T cells was down-regulated after vaccination, whereas the PD-1 level was not affected significantly. A temporal increase in activation levels of NK cells and NKT-like cells was recorded, dependent on whether the individuals had COVID-19 prior to vaccination. A short-term elevation of the activating NKG2D and CD16 was observed in NK cells. Overall, the findings of the study are in favor of the Sputnik V vaccine not provoking a dramatic phenotypic rearrangement in T and NK cells, although it induces their slight temporal non-specific activation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Immune Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccines)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research, Other

35 pages, 2230 KiB  
Review
Navigating the Landscape of B Cell Mediated Immunity and Antibody Monitoring in SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Efficacy: Tools, Strategies and Clinical Trial Insights
by Sophie O’Reilly, Joanne Byrne, Eoin R. Feeney, Patrick W. G. Mallon and Virginie Gautier
Vaccines 2024, 12(10), 1089; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12101089 - 24 Sep 2024
Viewed by 728
Abstract
Correlates of Protection (CoP) are biomarkers above a defined threshold that can replace clinical outcomes as primary endpoints, predicting vaccine effectiveness to support the approval of new vaccines or follow up studies. In the context of COVID-19 vaccination, CoPs can help address challenges [...] Read more.
Correlates of Protection (CoP) are biomarkers above a defined threshold that can replace clinical outcomes as primary endpoints, predicting vaccine effectiveness to support the approval of new vaccines or follow up studies. In the context of COVID-19 vaccination, CoPs can help address challenges such as demonstrating vaccine effectiveness in special populations, against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants or determining the durability of vaccine-elicited immunity. While anti-spike IgG titres and viral neutralising capacity have been characterised as CoPs for COVID-19 vaccination, the contribution of other components of the humoral immune response to immediate and long-term protective immunity is less well characterised. This review examines the evidence supporting the use of CoPs in COVID-19 clinical vaccine trials, and how they can be used to define a protective threshold of immunity. It also highlights alternative humoral immune biomarkers, including Fc effector function, mucosal immunity, and the generation of long-lived plasma and memory B cells and discuss how these can be applied to clinical studies and the tools available to study them. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Immune Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccines)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research, Review

9 pages, 708 KiB  
Brief Report
SARS-CoV-2 Humoral Immunity Persists Following Rituximab Therapy
by Liangjian Lu, Chang Yien Chan, Yi Yang Lim, Mya Than, Sharon Teo, Perry Y. W. Lau, Kar Hui Ng and Hui Kim Yap
Vaccines 2023, 11(12), 1864; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11121864 - 18 Dec 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1354
Abstract
Long-term humoral immunity is mediated by short-lived plasma cells (replenished by memory B cells) and long-lived plasma cells. Their relative contributions are uncertain for immunity to SARS-CoV-2, especially given the widespread use of novel mRNA vaccines. Yet, this has far-reaching implications in terms [...] Read more.
Long-term humoral immunity is mediated by short-lived plasma cells (replenished by memory B cells) and long-lived plasma cells. Their relative contributions are uncertain for immunity to SARS-CoV-2, especially given the widespread use of novel mRNA vaccines. Yet, this has far-reaching implications in terms of the need for regular booster doses in the general population and perhaps even revaccination in patients receiving B cell-depleting therapy. We aimed to characterise anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody titres in patients receiving Rituximab following previous SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. We recruited 10 fully vaccinated patients (age: 16.9 ± 2.52 years) with childhood-onset nephrotic syndrome, not in relapse, receiving Rituximab for their steroid/calcineurin-inhibitor sparing effect. Antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) and nucleocapsid (N) proteins were measured immediately prior to Rituximab and again ~6 months later, using the Roche Elecys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 (S) assay. All ten patients were positive for anti-S antibodies prior to Rituximab, with six patients (60%) having titres above the upper limit of detection (>12,500 U/mL). Following Rituximab therapy, there was a reduction in anti-S titres (p = 0.043), but all patients remained positive for anti-S antibodies, with five patients (50%) continuing to have titres >12,500 U/mL. Six patients (60%) were positive for anti-N antibodies prior to Rituximab. Following Rituximab therapy, only three of these six patients remained positive for anti-N antibodies (p = 0.036 compared to anti-S seroreversion). Humoral immunity to SARS-CoV-2 is likely to be mediated in part by long-lived plasma cells. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Immune Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccines)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop