sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Environmental Sustainability of Contemporary Land Use Change

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Social Ecology and Sustainability".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 June 2021) | Viewed by 32374

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
PRODIG, UMR 8586 CNRS, Bâtiment Olympe de Gouges, Place Paul Ricoeur, 75013 Paris, France
Interests: land use/land cover monitoring; land degradation and desertification; vegetation ecology; ecosystem functioning
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Land use changes during the last 3 centuries have dramatically increased, driven by population growth and technological evolution since the Industrial Revolution. Deforestation and agricultural expansion have been the major features, enhancing the global greenhouse effect. Over the last 50 years, the world’s agricultural production has grown 2.5 times, while cultivated land increased only by 12% (FAOSTAT, 2015), but current practices are unsustainable, reducing biodiversity and requiring massive external inputs. However, land use change does not occur evenly, and in some parts of the developed world, the process of natural land conversion has stopped or has even been reversed. Another obvious driver of land use change in recent decades has been increasing urbanization, with higher rates in developing countries, challenging sustainable development goals, from local to global scales.

Multitemporal land use/land cover maps are currently available on a regular basis from remote sensing data. Considerable progress is being made concerning annual continental or global monitoring of land use/land cover changes observed at low/medium spatial resolutions (1 km–100 m). An example is the annual land cover change of Africa product with 100 m spatial resolution for the years 2015–2018, available from Copernicus Global Land Service. Validation and analysis of observed land conversion changes are needed, using higher-resolution remote sensing data and ground observations.

Contributors from different fields are invited to submit their articles on topics including (but not limited to): patterns of land use/land cover changes at several spatial and temporal scales, drivers of land use changes, anticipated effects of climate change on croplands and rangelands, urban sprawl, and dynamics of rural/urban interface. Research should address current and projected environmental consequences of land use change, including possible depletion of ecosystem services (food and fiber supply, conservation of biodiversity, surface water regulation, soil protection, desertification mitigation, etc.).

Dr. Bernard Lacaze
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Land use/land cover monitoring
  • Land use sustainability
  • Coupled human–environment systems
  • Sustainable agriculture intensification
  • Deforestation/afforestation
  • Urban sprawl
  • Ecosystem services

Published Papers (8 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

16 pages, 10454 KiB  
Article
Sheep in the Vineyard: First Insights into a New Integrated Crop–Livestock System in Central Europe
by Nicolas Schoof, Anita Kirmer, Jakob Hörl, Rainer Luick, Sabine Tischew, Michael Breuer, Frank Fischer, Sandra Müller and Vivien von Königslöw
Sustainability 2021, 13(22), 12340; https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212340 - 9 Nov 2021
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 3888
Abstract
The multiple land use of agricultural areas is a building block for increased land use efficiency. Unlike monoculture, integrated crop–livestock systems optimally improve ecosystem services, making it an important field of research and application for adapting land use and food systems that have [...] Read more.
The multiple land use of agricultural areas is a building block for increased land use efficiency. Unlike monoculture, integrated crop–livestock systems optimally improve ecosystem services, making it an important field of research and application for adapting land use and food systems that have sustainability deficits. The integration of sheep in viticulture production is described as a promising example of an integrated crop–livestock system. While some studies of the integration of sheep into vineyards are already available for other parts of the world, there is still no research on its implementation in Central European viticulture systems. In order to fill this gap of knowledge, we conducted standardized interviews with 34 winegrowers who already graze sheep in their vineyards. The method allowed a wider overview of the implementation of the integrated crop-livestock system than would have been possible with other approaches. Furthermore, the authors kept sheep in their own vineyard for three years to evaluate the statements of the survey participants. The period during which sheep graze in vineyards is quite heterogeneous in Central Europe. Some farms use sheep only during vine dormancy; others also let sheep graze during a certain period in summer. There are also viticulture training systems where grazing is almost continuously possible. In Central Europe, summer grazing normally requires operational adjustments such as lifting the wires of the training system and branches of the vine; otherwise, the vines could be damaged. This option seems to be tailored to the training system in use. Some interviewees mentioned that sheep not only use the accompanying vegetation as fodder and therefore control the undervine growth, but in some cases, they were also able to replace other work processes, such as defoliating the grape zone or cleaning undesired vine shoots near the ground. However, a high additional workload due to livestock keeping was also mentioned by some survey participants. Some of the interviewees cooperate with shepherds, which could help to solve this challenge. Finally, we summarize possible opportunities and risks of this integrated crop–livestock system. Integrating sheep in vineyards seems to be quite feasible in the period of vine dormancy, whereas more information and considerably more effort is needed to integrate sheep during the vegetation period. Further research is needed to answer open questions especially for the necessary adaptions of the common vine training system or the implementation of alternative systems more suitable to combine with livestock keeping. Some practitioners found opportunities to merchandize the use of sheep in wine sales. This potentially unique selling point could be a solution for a broader consideration of sheep in vineyards. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmental Sustainability of Contemporary Land Use Change)
Show Figures

Figure 1

37 pages, 2257 KiB  
Article
When Land Meets Finance in Latin America: Some Intersections between Financialization and Land Grabbing in Argentina and Brazil
by Jorge Garcia-Arias, Alan Cibils, Agostina Costantino, Vitor B. Fernandes and Eduardo Fernández-Huerga
Sustainability 2021, 13(14), 8084; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13148084 - 20 Jul 2021
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 3912
Abstract
Financialization is one of the most relevant processes embedded in the functioning and evolution of the contemporary capitalist model and presents differential characteristics in the peripheral economies of the world-system. In turn, land grabbing is also one of the most relevant phenomena taking [...] Read more.
Financialization is one of the most relevant processes embedded in the functioning and evolution of the contemporary capitalist model and presents differential characteristics in the peripheral economies of the world-system. In turn, land grabbing is also one of the most relevant phenomena taking place in the field of farmland and land use, with particular significance also within the Global South. After presenting an in-depth analysis of both phenomena for Latin America, we specifically study the case of the two Latin American countries (Argentina and Brazil) where land grabbing has a greater qualitative and quantitative importance. In our article, we analyze the main interrelationships between both processes and show how financialization has played a fundamental role (together with the policies designed and the de-regulations implemented by respective states, and the participation of other domestic actors) in the land grabbing process in both countries. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmental Sustainability of Contemporary Land Use Change)
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 5358 KiB  
Article
Land Use/Land Cover Changes in the Tlemcen Region (Algeria) and Classification of Fragile Areas
by Abdelkader Bardadi, Zahira Souidi, Marianne Cohen and Mohamed Amara
Sustainability 2021, 13(14), 7761; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147761 - 12 Jul 2021
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2689
Abstract
The Tlemcen region is characterized by very diverse and steep areas exposed to gravity hazards, especially in high and medium mountain areas. Tlemcen National Park was chosen for this study, the main objective of which is to map fragile areas in close relation [...] Read more.
The Tlemcen region is characterized by very diverse and steep areas exposed to gravity hazards, especially in high and medium mountain areas. Tlemcen National Park was chosen for this study, the main objective of which is to map fragile areas in close relation to reduced vegetation cover due to land-use changes and forest fires. Multi-source data were used to monitor land use/land cover (LULC)patterns in the study area between 1987 and 2017. The methodology is based on an object-oriented classification of the Landsat images, using the K nearest neighbor method for mapping the major LULC classes at the national park level. The results show that LULC is constantly changing in the study area. In 1987, the landscape was made up of (16.5%) oak forests (holm oak, cork oak, zean oak) and Aleppo pine, which then deteriorated following repeated fires in the nineties to barely represent 7.22% of the surface in 1995, followed by a fast forest reclamation, with the forest area doubling in 10 years (13.46% of the area in 2005), and a near stabilization of the forest cover in 2017 with 14.68% of the area. These mutations are mainly due to fluctuations in anthropogenic action. Despite past declines and disturbances, the current forested area in the Tlemcen area represents significant forest capital classified as a national park to be protected and developed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmental Sustainability of Contemporary Land Use Change)
Show Figures

Figure 1

27 pages, 3718 KiB  
Article
Complex Socio-Ecological Systems: Translating Narratives into Future Land Use and Land Cover Scenarios in the Kilombero Catchment, Tanzania
by Katharina Proswitz, Mamkwe Claudia Edward, Mariele Evers, Felister Mombo, Alexander Mpwaga, Kristian Näschen, Jennifer Sesabo and Britta Höllermann
Sustainability 2021, 13(12), 6552; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126552 - 8 Jun 2021
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3676
Abstract
The Kilombero wetland in Tanzania is affected by advancing land use and land cover changes (LULCC), where we observe a conflict between development interests and the necessity of conservation measures to maintain the functionalities of the ecosystem. Thus, assessing patterns of LULCC is [...] Read more.
The Kilombero wetland in Tanzania is affected by advancing land use and land cover changes (LULCC), where we observe a conflict between development interests and the necessity of conservation measures to maintain the functionalities of the ecosystem. Thus, assessing patterns of LULCC is crucial to foresee potential future developments and to develop sustainable future management strategies. In this study, we use a multi-method scenario approach to assess the spatial implications and underlying driving forces of potential change by (1) developing a System Dynamics Causal Loop Diagram (CLD) to disentangle the underlying socio-economic and ecologic driving forces, (2) deriving a qualitative business-as-usual (BAU) and a conservation scenario from participatory narratives elaborated during a stakeholder workshop, and (3) quantifying the spatial implications of these scenarios with the Land Change Modeler (LCM). Results indicate that under the BAU assumption only 37% of the natural vegetation is expected to persist until 2030 in the wetland. In contrast, strict enforcement of protected areas (conservation scenario) halts further conversion of the wetland. However, both scenarios pinpoint considerable expansions of cropland in the western highlands with potentially serious impacts on catchment-wide hydrological processes. The produced qualitative and quantitative outputs reveal hotspots of possible future change and starting points for advisable further research and management interventions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmental Sustainability of Contemporary Land Use Change)
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 42015 KiB  
Article
Worldwide Research on Land Use and Land Cover in the Amazon Region
by Néstor Montalván-Burbano, Andrés Velastegui-Montoya, Miguel Gurumendi-Noriega, Fernando Morante-Carballo and Marcos Adami
Sustainability 2021, 13(11), 6039; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116039 - 27 May 2021
Cited by 33 | Viewed by 6210
Abstract
Land cover is an important descriptor of the earth’s terrestrial surface. It is also crucial to determine the biophysical processes in global environmental change. Land-use change showcases the management of the land while revealing what motivated the alteration of the land cover. The [...] Read more.
Land cover is an important descriptor of the earth’s terrestrial surface. It is also crucial to determine the biophysical processes in global environmental change. Land-use change showcases the management of the land while revealing what motivated the alteration of the land cover. The type of land use can represent local economic and social benefits, framed towards regional sustainable development. The Amazon stands out for being the largest tropical forest globally, with the most extraordinary biodiversity, and plays an essential role in climate regulation. The present work proposes to carry out a bibliometric analysis of 1590 articles indexed in the Scopus database. It uses both Microsoft Excel and VOSviewer software for the evaluation of author keywords, authors, and countries. The method encompasses (i) search criteria, (ii) search and document compilation, (iii) software selection and data extraction, and (iv) data analysis. The results classify the main research fields into nine main topics with increasing relevance: ‘Amazon’, ‘deforestation’, ‘remote sensing’, ‘land use and land cover change’, and ‘land use’. In conclusion, the cocitation authors’ network reveals the development of such areas and the interest they present due to their worldwide importance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmental Sustainability of Contemporary Land Use Change)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 2693 KiB  
Article
Analyzing the Patterns, Trends and Dynamics of the Land-Use Changes in Azores Region: From 1990 to 2018
by Rui Alexandre Castanho, José Manuel Naranjo Gómez, Gualter Couto, Pedro Pimentel, Áurea Sousa and Maria da Graça Batista
Sustainability 2021, 13(10), 5433; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105433 - 13 May 2021
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2478
Abstract
The remarkable richness and singularity of the Azorean Region (located 38° North) and its landscapes require a sharp, well-defined, and comprehensive planning policy. Bearing in mind the significance of this issue in the enlightenment of sustainability, planning strategies should be based and supported [...] Read more.
The remarkable richness and singularity of the Azorean Region (located 38° North) and its landscapes require a sharp, well-defined, and comprehensive planning policy. Bearing in mind the significance of this issue in the enlightenment of sustainability, planning strategies should be based and supported by different studies and thematic domains to understand the problem thoroughly. Using GIS (Geographic Information Systems), the present article enables us to identify the dynamics and patterns of the evolution of the Land-Use Changes in the Azores Region from 1990 to 2018. In aggregate, the Azores islands showed growth in artificial surfaces and forest and seminatural land-uses by essentially decreasing agricultural areas—most resulting from the economic and social development strategy pursued by several Azorean governments. Moreover, this study permits us to reinforce that the Azores Archipelago’s land-uses has undergone multiple changes—marked by increasing and decreasing periods. In fact, some of these reducing dynamics are disturbing. They require closer monitorization by regional government actors to give protection, preservation, and conservation to these incomparable ultra-peripheral landscapes, environments, ecosystems, and the region as a whole. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmental Sustainability of Contemporary Land Use Change)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 5440 KiB  
Article
Monitoring and Predicting Spatio-Temporal Land Use/Land Cover Changes in Zaria City, Nigeria, through an Integrated Cellular Automata and Markov Chain Model (CA-Markov)
by Auwalu Faisal Koko, Wu Yue, Ghali Abdullahi Abubakar, Roknisadeh Hamed and Akram Ahmed Noman Alabsi
Sustainability 2020, 12(24), 10452; https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410452 - 14 Dec 2020
Cited by 38 | Viewed by 4965
Abstract
Monitoring land use/land cover (LULC) change dynamics plays a crucial role in formulating strategies and policies for the effective planning and sustainable development of rapidly growing cities. Therefore, this study sought to integrate the cellular automata and Markov chain model using remotely sensed [...] Read more.
Monitoring land use/land cover (LULC) change dynamics plays a crucial role in formulating strategies and policies for the effective planning and sustainable development of rapidly growing cities. Therefore, this study sought to integrate the cellular automata and Markov chain model using remotely sensed data and geographical information system (GIS) techniques to monitor, map, and detect the spatio-temporal LULC change in Zaria city, Nigeria. Multi-temporal satellite images of 1990, 2005, and 2020 were pre-processed, geo-referenced, and mapped using the supervised maximum likelihood classification to examine the city’s historical land cover (1990–2020). Subsequently, an integrated cellular automata (CA)–Markov model was utilized to model, validate, and simulate the future LULC scenario using the land change modeler (LCM) of IDRISI-TerrSet software. The change detection results revealed an expansion in built-up areas and vegetation of 65.88% and 28.95%, respectively, resulting in barren land losing 63.06% over the last three decades. The predicted LULC maps of 2035 and 2050 indicate that these patterns of barren land changing into built-up areas and vegetation will continue over the next 30 years due to urban growth, reforestation, and development of agricultural activities. These results establish past and future LULC trends and provide crucial data useful for planning and sustainable land use management. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmental Sustainability of Contemporary Land Use Change)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

21 pages, 327 KiB  
Review
Tobacco and Deforestation Revisited. How to Move towards a Global Land-Use Transition?
by Helmut J. Geist
Sustainability 2021, 13(16), 9242; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169242 - 17 Aug 2021
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 3463
Abstract
Articles 17 and 18 of the United Nations (UN) Framework Convention on Tobacco Control address the environmental sustainability of tobacco as a contested agricultural crop. They require regulatory land-use policies to be introduced and designed to enhance a sustainability transition to diversified farming [...] Read more.
Articles 17 and 18 of the United Nations (UN) Framework Convention on Tobacco Control address the environmental sustainability of tobacco as a contested agricultural crop. They require regulatory land-use policies to be introduced and designed to enhance a sustainability transition to diversified farming practices and/or alternative livelihoods. Related activities of the UN Study/Working Group on Economically Sustainable Alternatives to Tobacco Growing are reviewed to assess and monitor the crop’s impact on natural resources with a focus on methods to identify tobacco-attributable deforestation (remote sensing, proxy values, secondary statistics, natural valuation, ecological/social surveys). It is posited that since 2007 no advances have been achieved in framing woody biomass destruction/degradation due to land extension and curing (i.e., drying green leaf using wood). Building on support by digital technologies and land surface monitoring systems, a novel post-2020 strategy is proposed to mainstream an extended set of indicators integratively, i.e., addressing biodiversity losses, soil carbon reservoirs and land degradation neutrality of tobacco as an agricultural crop. Thus, the point is emphasized that land stewardship requires political priority setting that makes the framing of land-use sustainability metrics more than a purely technical matter. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmental Sustainability of Contemporary Land Use Change)
Back to TopTop