Inclusion and Exclusion: New Trends in Conditional Welfare and Activation Trajectories

A special issue of Social Sciences (ISSN 2076-0760). This special issue belongs to the section "Social Policy and Welfare".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (15 December 2024) | Viewed by 2883

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Mid Sweden University, 85170 Sundsvall, Sweden
Interests: critical theory; spatiality; governmentality; processes of inclusion and exclusion

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Mid Sweden University, 85170 Sundsvall, Sweden
Interests: critical policy analysis; ruling relations; welfare conditionality; institutional frames

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Welfare systems are constantly undergoing structural transformations. Contemporary social policy and (post?)-welfare models are today characterized by theirs implementation of new forms of welfare, focusing on conditional or disciplinary welfare with increased threats of benefit withdrawal if recipients fail to comply with specific requirements. Changes include a major transfer of the costs of unemployment from the state to individuals as the expansion of activation policies goes from a more limited group of job-ready unemployed individuals to include a much broader and more marginalized group, including the so called ‘hard to employ groups’, who are gradually becoming objected to activation requirements (Berkel 2020, 197).

Placing such conditions on welfare recipients in return for the provision of benefits has undermined the concept of universal welfare rights (Watts & Fitzpatrick 2018; Dwyer 2008). These transformations, sometimes described as punitive and sanctionable (Wright, Fletcher & Stewart 2020), pose significant questions about the future organization of welfare systems and their inherent processes of inclusion and exclusion.

This issue aims to provide a platform that challenges and extends conventional perspectives on unemployment trajectories among welfare recipients. A critical policy perspective on social inclusion and exclusion calls for a nuanced understanding of these concepts and advocates for transformative social policies that address the root causes of exclusion and promote greater equality, justice, and inclusion within labor market.

We welcome submissions that focus on the multidimensional nature of social exclusion and inclusion and ask for critical studies of the second wave of activation policies from the perspective of processes of inclusion and exclusion, spanning over critical policy analysis, the lived experiences of vulnerable unemployed individuals targeted by activation policies, and their encounters with institutions, with a particular focus on youth, ethnicity and migration, gender and sexuality, disability, and class. Such analyses will be connected to questions of politics, economy, and welfare boundaries.

Please submit your proposals and any questions to Special Issue editors by 15 June 2024. Notification of acceptance will be provided by 30 June 2024. Final papers are due on 30 September 2024 for peer review.

References

  • Berkel, R. (2020) ‘Making Welfare Conditional: A Street-Level Perspective’, Social Policy & Administration, 54/2: 191–204.
  • Dwyer, P. (2008). Twelve: The conditional welfare state. In Modernising the welfare state. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
  • Watts, B., & Fitzpatrick, S. (2018). Welfare Conditionality (1st ed.). Routledge.
  • Wright S, Fletcher DR and Stewart ABR (2020) Punitive benefit sanctions, welfare conditionality, and the social abuse of unemployed people in Britain:  transforming claimants into offenders?  Social Policy Administration 54: 278–294.

Prof. Dr. Katarina Giritli Nygren
Dr. Sara Nyhlén
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Social Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • work fare
  • hard to employ groups
  • activation
  • conditional welfare
  • inclusion
  • exclusion

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

18 pages, 229 KiB  
Article
Exploring Institutional Framing of Local Labor Market Programs by Politicians and Managers in Swedish Municipalities
by Sara Nyhlén and Katarina Giritli Nygren
Soc. Sci. 2025, 14(6), 382; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14060382 - 17 Jun 2025
Viewed by 8
Abstract
This study explores the governance and implementation of local labor market programs (LLMPs) in Swedish municipalities, analyzing the tension between national mandates and local policy practices. Drawing on institutional ethnography (IE), intersectionality, and emotional labor theories, we examine interviews with politicians and managers [...] Read more.
This study explores the governance and implementation of local labor market programs (LLMPs) in Swedish municipalities, analyzing the tension between national mandates and local policy practices. Drawing on institutional ethnography (IE), intersectionality, and emotional labor theories, we examine interviews with politicians and managers from eight municipalities. Politicians frame LLMPs as budget-driven initiatives, depoliticizing local labor market issues to comply with national policies like the January Agreement. This approach prioritizes efficiency, workfare models, and quick labor market entry, often sidelining individualized support. In contrast, managers describe their role as navigating policy constraints while addressing diverse local needs. They emphasize the challenges of aligning “one-size-fits-all” activation strategies with the realities of their participants, advocating for flexibility and adaptation within national frameworks. These contrasting perspectives reveal how LLMPs, although locally implemented, are shaped by textually mediated national policies, which influence local governance practices. Politicians focus on the need to meet national objectives, while managers struggle to reconcile these goals with participant-centered approaches. This study contributes to the understanding of how LLMPs operate within a governance framework that prioritizes efficiency over holistic support, highlighting the limitations of workfare-oriented policies and their implications for labor market integration. Full article
17 pages, 273 KiB  
Article
Deemed as ‘Distant’: Categorizing Unemployment in Sweden’s Evolving Welfare Landscape
by Maja Östling
Soc. Sci. 2025, 14(3), 129; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14030129 - 21 Feb 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 536
Abstract
Over the past 30 years, Swedish labor market politics has swayed towards stronger workfare tendencies, emphasizing activation requirements for unemployed individuals to access welfare benefits. This process aligns with broader neoliberal reforms, fostering an individualistic view of unemployment characterized by personal responsibility for [...] Read more.
Over the past 30 years, Swedish labor market politics has swayed towards stronger workfare tendencies, emphasizing activation requirements for unemployed individuals to access welfare benefits. This process aligns with broader neoliberal reforms, fostering an individualistic view of unemployment characterized by personal responsibility for employability. In 2023, the Swedish Public Employment Service (PES) published a report addressing the needs of and solutions for long-term unemployed individuals ‘distant from the labor market’ (Sw. personer långt från arbetsmarknaden), marking the first formal use of this term as the main adhesive category in a political document. This paper examines the construction of the subject position ‘distant from the labor market’, investigating how it delineates and differentiates subgroups within the unemployed population, how this subgroup is understood in relation to other actors, and how discursive frameworks imbue this category with various meanings. Lastly, the paper discusses the categorization in relation to the current developments in the Swedish welfare system, arguing that the formalization of this category should be understood in relation to parallel political processes, such as proposals for a duty of activity for the unemployed, suggesting how this points to a way forward defined by neoliberal tendencies and welfare conditionality. Full article
20 pages, 670 KiB  
Article
Welfare Conditionality and Social Identity Effect Mechanisms and the Case of Immigrant Support
by Lena von Deylen and Philipp C. Wichardt
Soc. Sci. 2025, 14(1), 52; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14010052 - 17 Jan 2025
Viewed by 1063
Abstract
The present paper discusses the effects of social identity and self-determination theory and highlights their relevance for welfare conditionality with respect to individual behaviour and well-being. While welfare conditionality may provide economic incentives for certain desired behaviours, e.g., active job search, it is [...] Read more.
The present paper discusses the effects of social identity and self-determination theory and highlights their relevance for welfare conditionality with respect to individual behaviour and well-being. While welfare conditionality may provide economic incentives for certain desired behaviours, e.g., active job search, it is argued that their impact on the claimants’ social self-construal and identity may offset potentially positive effects and increase, for example, social segregation. Taking the integration of immigrants, one of the biggest contemporary challenges for many societies, as a leading example, possible negative effects of welfare conditionality are highlighted and contrasted with the imposed economic incentives. Weighing benefits and potential risks, it is argued that the excessive use of welfare conditionality is likely to backfire in the long run and that this should be taken into account by policy makers. Moreover, it is argued how similar effects can be expected to arise also in different contexts such as the support of child parenting by singles. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop