The Public Child Welfare System: Discourses on Research, Practice and Policy

A special issue of Social Sciences (ISSN 2076-0760). This special issue belongs to the section "Childhood and Youth Studies".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (28 February 2026) | Viewed by 2776

Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Social Work and Criminal Justice, University of Washington Tacoma, Tacoma, WA 98402-3100, USA
Interests: mother-child attachment relationship; adult attachment typology; childhood trauma; kinship care; racial disproportionality and disparities in child welfare; and children of incarcerated parents

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Social Work and Criminal Justice, University of Washington Tacoma, Tacoma, WA 98402-3100, USA
Interests: Criminal Justice; Social Work; Qualitative Analysis; Child Development; Violence Prevention

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

This Special Issue of Social Sciences, “The Public Child Welfare System: Discourses on Research, Practice and Policy”, seeks original manuscripts dedicated to advancing knowledge on child welfare practices and policies. Despite over a century of organized public child welfare, the system still encounters numerous challenges, often failing to meet the complex needs of individuals and families. Legislatively and discursively, there is much debate about whether the child welfare system, in its current state, effectively acts in the best interest of children and youth or utilizes its policies and practices to police, monitor and control children, youth and families, particularly Black, Indigenous, and other children, youth and families of color. We encourage the submission of cutting-edge research studies that discuss child welfare, providing a clear and thorough analysis of various practices and policies and their implications. [EE1] We also welcome manuscripts exploring innovative approaches to delivering child welfare services, from the entry of a child into the system to their exit via family reunification, adoption, legal guardianship, or aging out of the system. [EE2] Papers should highlight the strengths of children, youth and families and investigate ways to enhance child wellbeing, reduce entry into the child welfare system and increase early exits from the system via family reunification, adoption, and legal guardianship.

Interested authors are asked to submit an abstract (200-250 words) discussing their topic, including key factors that will be addressed. Abstracts will be selected within two weeks of submission based on their quality, relevance to the Special Issue, and contribution to the overall child welfare discourse on research, practice, and policy. Selected authors will be invited to submit a completed manuscript for consideration in this Special Issue. All manuscripts, including invited submissions, must undergo a peer-review process prior to the selection of the final manuscripts to be published.

Please submit your abstract via email to the Guest Editor, Dr. Marian S. Harris, mh24@uw.edu and Co-Editor, Dr. Keva M. Miller, PhD, MSSW, kevamill@uw.edu.

Prof. Dr. Marian Harris
Prof. Dr. Keva Miller
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-anonymized peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Social Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • children
  • youth and families
  • child welfare
  • foster care
  • racial disproportionality
  • permanency planning
  • family reunification
  • kinship care
  • child abuse and neglect
  • trauma informed practice
  • child safety
  • incarceration
  • ACEs
  • poverty and child neglect

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (8 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

15 pages, 513 KB  
Article
When Self-Care Isn’t Enough: The Practice of Soul Care and Mitigation of Soul Wounds in Public Child Welfare Workers
by Nancy Kuhuski and Sarah Dubitzky
Soc. Sci. 2026, 15(6), 409; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci15060409 (registering DOI) - 22 Jun 2026
Abstract
Protecting the safety and well-being of children in public child welfare is one of the most critical and demanding jobs in social work. Burnout, secondary traumatic stress, and moral injury are prevalent in this field and often occur simultaneously. This intersectional experience impacts [...] Read more.
Protecting the safety and well-being of children in public child welfare is one of the most critical and demanding jobs in social work. Burnout, secondary traumatic stress, and moral injury are prevalent in this field and often occur simultaneously. This intersectional experience impacts the deepest level of a person—their soul. When left unaddressed, these soul wounds come at a high cost to the workers, organizations they work for, the clients they serve, and their greater communities. This qualitative study sought to explore and identify the characteristics of soul care and the power it has to transform the lived experiences of child welfare workers. Collaborative, semi-structured interviews were conducted with seven workers who had been in this field for 10 or more years and described themselves as having good soul care. Findings from this study concluded the combination of strongly held core beliefs and engagement in a steady regulation loop constituted soul care. Soul care can occur regardless of circumstance. When a soul wound occurs, the Soul Wound Cycle is activated. The momentum of the regulation loop propels one’s movement through this cycle, allowing the processing of the soul wound, resulting in increased resiliency and regaining of equilibrium, ultimately leading to better outcomes for children. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 265 KB  
Article
The Tribally Adapted National Training and Development Curriculum (NTDC): Impact on Foster and Adoptive Parent Preparedness to Foster American Indian Children from the Southwest Region of the United States
by Angelique G. Day, Carson Ball, Norma Hernandez, Katie Baudhuin, Becky Carino and Becky Main
Soc. Sci. 2026, 15(6), 406; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci15060406 (registering DOI) - 22 Jun 2026
Abstract
Foster parents working with children who are American Indian/Alaskan Native (AIAN) face challenges to provide trauma-informed, developmentally appropriate, and culturally relevant care for the children in their care. The Tribally Adapted National Training and Development Curriculum is a state-of-the-art training program designed to [...] Read more.
Foster parents working with children who are American Indian/Alaskan Native (AIAN) face challenges to provide trauma-informed, developmentally appropriate, and culturally relevant care for the children in their care. The Tribally Adapted National Training and Development Curriculum is a state-of-the-art training program designed to prepare foster parents to effectively parent AIAN children exposed to trauma and to provide these families with ongoing skill development necessary to understand and promote healthy child development. The current study describes the results of two focus groups (N = 11) that occurred in person in the social services office of the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community in May of 2022. Findings describe the experiences of participants that completed the tribal NTDC training and how the training impacted their readiness and experience to foster in comparison with parents of AIAN foster children who received the training-as-usual training protocol (Foster Parent College (FPC)) provided by the State child welfare authority. Full article
21 pages, 302 KB  
Article
What Does It Take to Ensure Children’s Cultural Care? Examining Organisational Drivers Across Five National Contexts
by Kathy Karatasas, Rebekah Grace and Daryl J. Higgins
Soc. Sci. 2026, 15(6), 351; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci15060351 - 28 May 2026
Viewed by 275
Abstract
Children’s cultural care is not an ancillary practice concern but a central element of governance, safeguarding, and ethical responsibility within out-of-home care systems. Across child protection systems internationally, out-of-home care services are mandated to safeguard children while upholding statutory and international care obligations. [...] Read more.
Children’s cultural care is not an ancillary practice concern but a central element of governance, safeguarding, and ethical responsibility within out-of-home care systems. Across child protection systems internationally, out-of-home care services are mandated to safeguard children while upholding statutory and international care obligations. Leadership sets direction, organisational structures embed accountability, and learning cultures sustain responsiveness, forming an architecture that protects children’s cultural identities as inseparable from their safety, wellbeing, and belonging. Cultural care thus signals organisational integrity and the translation of rights-based commitments into practice. Yet many out-of-home care organisations struggle to support children from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds to maintain connections with family, community, and culture. Responsibility is often delegated to individual caseworkers, limiting systemic impact. Whole-of-organisation approaches are needed to embed cultural connection as a core safeguarding priority, strengthen accountability, and develop practitioner capability. Interviews with representatives from service organisations across five countries examined the organisational drivers that enable effective cultural care and the factors shaping the implementation of practice tools. Findings highlight the interconnected roles of leadership, governance, workforce development, and practitioner teams in sustaining culturally responsive practice. This paper reinforces shared responsibility across organisational levels to act with intentionality and cultural curiosity in supporting children’s rights to identity and belonging and concludes with an A–Z prompt tool offering reflective questions for leaders and practitioners to strengthen organisational approaches to cultural care. Full article
20 pages, 270 KB  
Article
Extended Foster Care Practice and Program Reform: Perspectives of Workers and Community Partners
by Emiko A. Tajima, Kristian V. Jones, Jon M. Torres, Isaac A. Sanders, Carina Mendoza, Brittney Lee and Jennifer Personius
Soc. Sci. 2026, 15(6), 347; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci15060347 - 25 May 2026
Viewed by 273
Abstract
Extended Foster Care (EFC) provides services and benefits on a voluntary basis to young adults leaving the foster care system without having attained legal permanency. In the US, more than 19,000 young adults transitioned out of foster care without achieving legal permanency in [...] Read more.
Extended Foster Care (EFC) provides services and benefits on a voluntary basis to young adults leaving the foster care system without having attained legal permanency. In the US, more than 19,000 young adults transitioned out of foster care without achieving legal permanency in 2021. As states seek to improve supports to young adults eligible for EFC, it is important to identify institutional barriers and needed practice reforms. This study reports on analyses of qualitative focus group data gathered from workers (N = 24) and interviews with community practitioners (N = 14) as part of Washington state’s collaborative systems assessment of EFC. Data from transcripts were analyzed using qualitative thematic analysis of coded content. Rapid qualitative analysis allowed for efficient analysis and sorting of data to gather findings prior to the legislative session. Key themes identified related to (1) service and benefit gaps and needs, (2) organizational practice reforms, and (3) a need for culturally responsive services and a representative workforce. Specifically, workforce staff and community partners emphasized the need for EFC-specific units, developmentally tailored training, working from a clearly articulated practice model relevant to youth and young adults, the importance of reducing caseloads, recruitment and retention of a representative workforce, and more evidence-based practice options for EFC. Full article
17 pages, 649 KB  
Article
Decoding Narrative Statements in Child Protective Services Hotline Calls: A Methodological Approach
by Chereese Phillips and Caroline Black
Soc. Sci. 2026, 15(5), 329; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci15050329 - 18 May 2026
Viewed by 362
Abstract
There is clear evidence that non-safety-related concerns abound in child protection hotline calls. In the United States, over half of Child Protective Services (CPS) calls are screened out because they do not meet criteria for a child welfare investigation. While reporter bias is [...] Read more.
There is clear evidence that non-safety-related concerns abound in child protection hotline calls. In the United States, over half of Child Protective Services (CPS) calls are screened out because they do not meet criteria for a child welfare investigation. While reporter bias is one factor theorized to contribute to this level of screened out calls, the field has neither used methods that account for culturally specific socialization processes involved in bias nor analyzed hotline calls to determine if these biases were present. This paper describes cultural domain analysis (CDA) as an innovative method to inform the measurement and assessment of bias in reporters’ narratives about children and families during calls to a CPS hotline. We describe CDA, which involves a rapid interviewing technique (freelisting), a participatory method for coding (pile sorting) and how the resultant findings can be used to inform the development of a measurement framework (codebook and scale), which may be tested using recorded hotline calls. Together, these methods provide a useable framework that can help surface common and shared ways bias is conceptualized and defined in the context of CPS hotline calls. This proposed approach provides a socially valid and reliable way for measurement to make generalizable inferences across a jurisdiction. When applied in practice, data collected and analyzed from the proposed measurement framework can inform jurisdictional CPS hotline policy, practice, and training. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 252 KB  
Article
Upstream Legal Advocacy During Pregnancy to Prevent Traumatic Child Welfare Separations: Evidence from the FIRST Legal Clinic
by Adam Ballout and Marian S. Harris
Soc. Sci. 2026, 15(5), 318; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci15050318 - 14 May 2026
Viewed by 310
Abstract
Legal advocacy for parents involved in the public child welfare system in the United States is typically initiated only after a child has been removed and a dependency petition has been filed. For infants, removal at or shortly after birth constitutes a profound [...] Read more.
Legal advocacy for parents involved in the public child welfare system in the United States is typically initiated only after a child has been removed and a dependency petition has been filed. For infants, removal at or shortly after birth constitutes a profound disruption of the parent–child attachment relationship and is increasingly recognized as an adverse childhood experience. This paper focuses on a summative program evaluation of the Family Intervention Response to Stop Trauma (FIRST) Legal Clinic in Washington State, a prevention-oriented model providing free, confidential legal advocacy and peer support to pregnant and postpartum parents prior to Child Protective Services (CPS) investigation or court involvement. Administrative data from 2019 to 2025 for 1232 eligible families were utilized to examine eligibility and referral patterns, reasons for ineligibility, and case outcomes. Findings demonstrated that eligible families with known outcomes avoided dependency court involvement entirely or experienced case closure without child removal, while a smaller proportion proceeded to dependency court filings. These findings highlight the need to reduce unnecessary child welfare system entry and mitigate traumatic disruption of the parent–child attachment relationship at birth by providing legal advocacy before investigation and court involvement. Full article
14 pages, 234 KB  
Article
Investing in the Child Welfare System Through the Workforce: Lessons Learned from a Title IV-E Child Welfare Stipend Program
by Yao Wang, Scott D. Ryan, Damone Wisdom, Hui Huang and Catherine A. LaBrenz
Soc. Sci. 2026, 15(5), 301; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci15050301 - 7 May 2026
Viewed by 321
Abstract
The child welfare system is designed to promote child safety, well-being, and permanency, but the high stress and intensity of cases require a specialized workforce. Using a qualitative case study design, this study explored the perspectives of current and former Title IV-E stipend [...] Read more.
The child welfare system is designed to promote child safety, well-being, and permanency, but the high stress and intensity of cases require a specialized workforce. Using a qualitative case study design, this study explored the perspectives of current and former Title IV-E stipend recipients on their preparation and readiness to actively participate in the child welfare workforce. The research team conducted semi-structured interviews with 10 individuals who had participated in a large Title IV-E stipend program in a southern state during a five-year period (2020–2025). Using applied thematic analysis, four main themes emerged: (1) bridging the classroom-practice gap; (2) professional preparation and development; and (3) experiences and future directions for Title IV-E Programs. We explored implications for Title IV-E policies and programs on specific strategies to best prepare the child welfare workforce so that they can best ensure child safety, permanency, and well-being. Full article
20 pages, 294 KB  
Article
Voluntary Placement of Children into Foster Care: Perspectives of Child Welfare Stakeholders
by JaeRan Kim, Josal Diebold, Annette Semanchin Jones, Laurel Bidwell and Katharine Hill
Soc. Sci. 2026, 15(5), 276; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci15050276 - 22 Apr 2026
Viewed by 607
Abstract
Voluntary placement agreements are a less understood avenue through which children and families receive child welfare services. This article describes a qualitative exploratory study of participants who oversee and engage with children and families utilizing voluntary placement services in two states (n [...] Read more.
Voluntary placement agreements are a less understood avenue through which children and families receive child welfare services. This article describes a qualitative exploratory study of participants who oversee and engage with children and families utilizing voluntary placement services in two states (n = 12). Thematic analysis of interviews revealed voluntary placements are used as a strategy for strengths-based engagement with families, including creative problem-solving, to help obtain resources for youth with emotional and behavioral health needs. Participants also described challenges managing ambiguity regarding the use of voluntary placements and acknowledged limitations and varied outcomes of voluntary placement. Youth in voluntary placements are often overlooked in broader child welfare and foster care practice and policy discussions. Stronger accountability and guidance on voluntary placements are needed to ensure children and families are provided adequate supports to reduce the need for out-of-home placements when possible. Full article
Back to TopTop