Big Data and Political Communication

A special issue of Social Sciences (ISSN 2076-0760).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 May 2026 | Viewed by 3595

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Journalism and New Media, School of Information Sciences, University Complutense Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
Interests: political communication; politics; fashion; history; media; media history; mass media

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Faculty of Communication, University of Seville, 41840 Seville, Spain
Interests: political communication; political journalism; protocol; social media; political campaigns
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Journalism and New Media, School of Information Sciences, University of Complutense Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
Interests: information theory; ethics and deontology; social networks; professional networks; new audiences; cultural Industries; political communication; gender; equality; television series

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The rapid rise of Big Data has revolutionized the landscape of political communication, fundamentally reshaping how campaigns are conducted, how politicians engage with the electorate, and how information flows through society. Today, political actors leverage vast amounts of data to influence voting behaviors, craft tailored messages, and micro-target specific segments of the population. This transformation opens up new opportunities for political strategies, but it also presents profound challenges to democratic values, transparency, and fairness.

At the heart of this change lies the growing role of social media platforms, which have become the primary venues for political discourse. Platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and Google wield unprecedented power over public opinion, often bypassing traditional media gatekeepers. The case of Donald Trump's use of Twitter during the 2016 U.S. elections, and the recent shifts in platform policies under Elon Musk’s leadership of Twitter, highlights the immense influence these platforms hold in shaping political narratives. Yet, the lack of effective regulation surrounding the use of data and digital communication continues to amplify risks, from misinformation to the manipulation of voters.

The growing influence of populism across the globe further complicates this issue. Big Data has been instrumental in the rise of populist movements, enabling leaders to tailor messages that resonate with specific fears and grievances, while undermining traditional political discourse. As these technologies evolve, the following question arises: how can democracies adapt to a world where data-driven political communication challenges the very foundations of political legitimacy and public trust?

This dossier seeks to explore these critical questions. How do Big Data and political communication intersect in a world dominated by digital media and algorithmic decision making? What are the ethical implications of micro-targeting and voter manipulation? And most urgently, what role should legislation and regulation play in ensuring that these technologies do not undermine democratic processes but rather enhance transparency, equity, and fairness?

Key Questions for Research

  • How does Big Data influence political messaging and voter behavior in contemporary campaigns?
  • In what ways does the micro-targeting of voters using personal data contribute to political polarization and the rise of populism?
  • What ethical dilemmas arise from the use of Big Data in political communication, particularly in terms of privacy, manipulation, and transparency?
  • How have social media platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram reshaped the dynamics of political debate, and what is their responsibility in regulating political content?
  • What lessons can be learned from the use of Twitter in the 2016 U.S. election and the role of Elon Musk in reshaping platform policies?
  • To what extent do current regulatory frameworks address the challenges posed by Big Data in political communication, and where are they failing?
  • Can Big Data enhance or hinder the legitimacy of elections and the broader democratic process?

This Special Issue aims to illuminate the future of political communication in the age of Big Data, offering a nuanced understanding of its potential to transform democratic practices—both for better and for worse.

Dr. Ana María Velasco Molpeceres
Dr. Ricardo Domínguez-García
Prof. Dr. Graciela Padilla-Castillo
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Social Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • big data
  • political communication
  • populism
  • social media influence
  • micro-targeting
  • political polarization
  • misinformation
  • data privacy
  • electoral integrity
  • digital regulation

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

15 pages, 1923 KB  
Article
Journalistic Values and GenAI: A Transnational Study of Editorial Policies
by Rubén Rivas-de-Roca, Tania Forja-Pena, Artai Bringas-Gómez and Berta García-Orosa
Soc. Sci. 2026, 15(3), 198; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci15030198 - 18 Mar 2026
Viewed by 504
Abstract
The consolidation of artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming the journalistic sector, to the point that its ethical dimension is being altered. However, the mission and values of the media in the face of the current emergence of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) have barely [...] Read more.
The consolidation of artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming the journalistic sector, to the point that its ethical dimension is being altered. However, the mission and values of the media in the face of the current emergence of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) have barely been explored. Bearing this in mind, it is important to understand not only how journalists perceive AI, but also to examine the role that the media assign to themselves and the audience’s participation in this context. This research explores the roles defined by a sample of leading media outlets (n = 21) in seven countries in Western Europe and North America: France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the United Kingdom, Canada, and the United States. To this end, a discursive content analysis is applied to three newspapers (printed or digital) per country. The findings reflect differences between countries and media outlets, within a common trend of prioritizing responsibility as the primary editorial value, followed by truthfulness. We also found scant direct references to AI regulation, alongside the development of participatory interactivity within readership established by the media outlet. Furthermore, greater participation of audiences was observed in publicly funded publications, granting audiences a deliberative role. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Big Data and Political Communication)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 2783 KB  
Article
The Spectacle of Power: Hybridisation and Digital Populism in White House Communication (2025)
by Ana Velasco Molpeceres, Jonattan Rodríguez Hernández and Eglée Ortega Fernández
Soc. Sci. 2026, 15(3), 186; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci15030186 - 14 Mar 2026
Viewed by 556
Abstract
This article examines the institutional communication of the White House on X (formerly Twitter) during the first nine months of Donald Trump’s second presidency (January–October 2025). Through a mixed-methods approach that combines thematic, network, and lexical–discursive analysis, the study explores how the presidential [...] Read more.
This article examines the institutional communication of the White House on X (formerly Twitter) during the first nine months of Donald Trump’s second presidency (January–October 2025). Through a mixed-methods approach that combines thematic, network, and lexical–discursive analysis, the study explores how the presidential account (@WhiteHouse) integrates informational, emotional, and performative dimensions within a hybrid media system. The dataset comprises 4297 tweets, analysed through Graphext, NodeXL/Gephi, and Sketch Engine. The findings reveal that audiovisual and symbolic content dominate over political or policy-related topics, while financial and technological actors occupy central positions in the network of mentions. Lexical analysis highlights three semantic nuclei—Trump, President, and America—that structure a moralised and affective narrative of leadership. The results reflect that White House communication operates as a hybrid and post-bureaucratic model, where political legitimacy increasingly depends on visibility and reputational association with market logics. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Big Data and Political Communication)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1520 KB  
Article
Public Conversation on X During COP30: Engagement, Sentiment and Thematic Dynamics Around #COP30noBrasil
by Rafael Carrasco-Polaino
Soc. Sci. 2026, 15(1), 21; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci15010021 - 1 Jan 2026
Viewed by 600
Abstract
This study examines how public conversation on X unfolded during the COP30 climate summit, focusing on posts articulated around the official hashtag #COP30noBrasil and analysing a dataset of 1139 posts. Social media research has shown that platforms such as X play a central [...] Read more.
This study examines how public conversation on X unfolded during the COP30 climate summit, focusing on posts articulated around the official hashtag #COP30noBrasil and analysing a dataset of 1139 posts. Social media research has shown that platforms such as X play a central role in shaping climate communication, particularly during major diplomatic events. To explore this dynamic, all posts published between 10 and 21 November 2025 were collected using Tweet Binder and analysed quantitatively. Engagement, follower–following ratio and sentiment were computed, and non-parametric tests were applied given the non-normal distribution of the variables. Word clouds based on frequency and TF–IDF weighting were generated to identify prevalent topics in posts and replies. The results showed that activity was dominated by retweets, with original posts and replies representing smaller portions of the interaction. Engagement did not differ significantly between verified and unverified accounts, although posts with images generated higher interaction than text-only posts. No significant correlations emerged between engagement, sentiment or FF ratio. Replies displayed a less positive tone than original posts, suggesting a shift toward more neutral reactions. The thematic analysis indicated that original posts centred on planning and institutional aspects of COP30, while replies focused more on Amazon-related issues, resource extraction and calls for environmental protection. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Big Data and Political Communication)
Show Figures

Figure 1

27 pages, 327 KB  
Article
Governments, Users, and Virtual Worlds: Institutional Strategies in the Age of Big Data and IA
by Verónica Crespo-Pereira and Jorge Miranda-Galbe
Soc. Sci. 2025, 14(12), 679; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14120679 - 24 Nov 2025
Viewed by 688
Abstract
In recent years, several countries have introduced strategic plans aimed at promoting metaverse ecosystems. While these initiatives highlight the metaverse as both a technological frontier and a policy priority, the underlying rationales and metaverse approaches remain insufficiently understood. This gap raises the need [...] Read more.
In recent years, several countries have introduced strategic plans aimed at promoting metaverse ecosystems. While these initiatives highlight the metaverse as both a technological frontier and a policy priority, the underlying rationales and metaverse approaches remain insufficiently understood. This gap raises the need to critically examine why governments are investing in the metaverse ecosystem and how metaverse is being approached as an innovative platform for digital public services and businesses. An inductive and deductive content analysis was conducted on various regional, national and supranational metaverse strategic plans (n = 7). Virtual worlds can be understood as persistent, immersive, and interactive digital environments that integrate 3D visualisation, simulation, and real-time data to support activities across social and economic domains. The findings indicate that the metaverse is a virtual space shaped by the dual imperative of addressing societal needs—such as public service delivery and stakeholder engagement—and fostering business opportunities within the evolving digital ecosystem. The analysis revealed four main reasons to promote the social and industrial metaverse ecosystem: sustainability; digital sovereignty; competitive advantage and stakeholder building relationship. The results indicate that the metaverse operates mainly through both transactional and connected approaches, where digital twins, artificial intelligence, and extended reality converge to enable user experiences in ways that transcend physical limitations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Big Data and Political Communication)
Back to TopTop