Race and Ethnicity Without Diversity

A special issue of Social Sciences (ISSN 2076-0760).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (15 December 2025) | Viewed by 11681

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Education, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901, USA
Interests: educational legal and policy issues; K-16/P-20 systems; the impact of spirituality and religion on educational experiences; the preparation and socialization of student affairs professionals; graduate education; diversity and equity issues

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Leadership, Adult & Higher Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1V6, Canada
Interests: equity, diversity and inclusion; anti-racism; organizational change; transformational leadership

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

In Grutter v. Bollinger (2003), the Supreme Court upheld the pursuit of diversity in higher education and the consideration of race in making admissions decisions. Even as it supported diversity, Justice Sandra Day O’Connor’s majority decision forecasted “that 25 years from now, the use of racial preferences will no longer be necessary to further the [diversity] interest approved today” (Grutter v. Bollinger, 2003, p. 2347). Justice O’Connor’s appears to be partially correct as it took less than 25 years for the Supreme Court to rescind its support for race-conscious admissions policies (Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College [SFFA, Inc.], 2023). Concurrent with SFFA, Inc.s (2023) movement through the U.S. courts, many states considered and enacted legislation that eliminated diversity efforts on college campuses related to support programs, personnel assignments, and scholarships (Bryant & Appleby, 2025). Within the global context, varying concerns related to immigration, economics, institutional reputation, and individual outcomes limit both the opportunities for and effectiveness of initiatives designated to reduce racism, discrimination, and social impediments to higher education access and support (Borkowska & Laurence, 2024; Bryant & Appleby, 2025; Burrell, 2024; Détourbe & Goastellec, 2018; Jenkins, 2024; Warikoo, 2018). Yet, even as some actors pushback against race-conscious policies, students from lower castes and racial minority groups still struggle to attend, afford, persist with, and access the benefits associated with a college education (Burrell, 2024; Détourbe & Goastellec, 2018; Jenkins, 2024; Marcus, 2018; Warikoo, 2018).

This Special Issue examines the ways that higher education interprets and responds to race and ethnicity. Possible topics may include (but are not limited to) analysis of institutional policies and initiatives; reactions and responses to shifts in the political, economic, and social climate on and around campus; and the influence that race and ethnicity has on the admissions, attendance, completion, employment, and any other interactions people have with higher education. Within this broad umbrella, this Special Issue seeks to highlight varying perspectives on race and ethnicity in higher education as individuals, institutions, and other stakeholders navigate these conflicting landscapes.

We encourage and look forward to receiving submissions from both new and established voices. Please submit abstracts that outline your topic, approach, connection to the umbrella topic, and the anticipated contributions of your piece in two pages or less to the Special Issue Guest Editor, Saran Donahoo (drdonahoo@gmail.com). Abstracts are due no later than 1 May 2025. Authors will receive notification of acceptance by 1 June 2025. Papers accepted for submission are due by 15 October 2025.

References

Borkowska, Magda, and James Laurence. 2024. The role of ethnic diversity and residential segregation in shaping anti-immigrant sentiment and support for Brexit. Political Studies 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217241261748

Bryant, Jessica, and Chloe Appleby. 2025. These states’ anti-dei legislation may impact higher education. BestCollegs.com. https://www.bestcolleges.com/news/anti-dei-legislation-tracker/ (accessed on 27January 2025).

Burrell, Darrell Norman. 2024. Exploring the nature of diversity dishonesty within predominantly White schools of medicine, pharmacy, and public health at the most highly selective and highly ranked U.S. universities. Social Sciences, 13(7), 332. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13070332

Détourbe, Marie-Agnès, and Gaële Goastellec 2018. Revisiting the issues of access to higher education and social stratification through the case of refugees: A comparative study of spaces of opportunity for refugee students in Germany and England. Social Sciences, 7(10), 186. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7100186

Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 982. 2003.

Jenkins, Laura Dudley. 2024. Can affirmative action survive on the world’s campuses? Current History, 33-6. https://doi.org/10.1525/curh.2024.123.849.33

Marcus, Jon. 2018. Facts about race and college admission. The Hechinger Report.

https://hechingerreport.org/facts-about-race-and-college-admission/ (accessed on 27January 2025).

Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College, 600 U.S. 181. 2023.

Warikoo, Natasha. 2018. What meritocracy means to its winners: Admissions, race, and inequality at elite universities in the United States and Britain. Social Sciences, 7(8), 131. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7080131

Prof. Dr. Saran Donahoo
Dr. Denise O’Neil Green
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Social Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • race
  • ethnicity
  • higher education
  • diversity in higher education

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (8 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

20 pages, 501 KB  
Article
A Phenomenological Study of Black Employees’ Experiences with Workplace Training Participation in Canadian Universities
by Shurla Charles-Forbes
Soc. Sci. 2026, 15(4), 266; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci15040266 - 20 Apr 2026
Viewed by 336
Abstract
With the recent ban on Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) efforts, this study seeks to address an under-researched area—the lived experience of workplace training participation (WTP)/non-participation of Black administrative employees at Canadian universities. While research in academia has focused on faculty and students, [...] Read more.
With the recent ban on Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) efforts, this study seeks to address an under-researched area—the lived experience of workplace training participation (WTP)/non-participation of Black administrative employees at Canadian universities. While research in academia has focused on faculty and students, there is a lack of research on administrative employee participation within university settings in Canada. This gap is especially significant as this group composes a significant ratio of the entire workforce in Canadian universities. It is also important to understand the implications of WTP/non-participation for employees who identify as Black. This study used Stephen Billett’s conceptualization of affordance and access as a starting point to identify gaps in the workplace training (WT) literature, specifically as it pertains to Black employees. Data was collected from 26 Black administrative employees who discussed their lived experience with WTP in these settings. A qualitative approach from a phenomenological perspective was used to better understand the participants’ lived experiences with WTP. The results revealed a lack of transparency in the WT approval process, experiences of time pressure, managers’ discretion and racism as factors that influence WTP. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Race and Ethnicity Without Diversity)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 339 KB  
Article
“I Wanted to Make a Difference!” Black Male Post-Secondary Students’ Negotiations of Racial and Academic Identities
by Beverly-Jean M. Daniel
Soc. Sci. 2026, 15(3), 183; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci15030183 - 12 Mar 2026
Viewed by 650
Abstract
Within the Canadian context, the academic trajectory of Black males is typically discussed in terms of failure or disengagement, with comparatively little attention paid to those who persist and succeed in post-secondary education (PSE). This paper examines the factors that enhance African Canadian [...] Read more.
Within the Canadian context, the academic trajectory of Black males is typically discussed in terms of failure or disengagement, with comparatively little attention paid to those who persist and succeed in post-secondary education (PSE). This paper examines the factors that enhance African Canadian males’ pursuit of PSE in Ontario and explores how their understandings of race, racism, and PBRI shape their academic trajectories. Drawing on Critical Race Theory and a Positive Black Racial Identity (PBRI) framework, the study analyzes phone interviews with 18 Black male post-secondary students drawn from a larger qualitative project on Black student success involving 56 participants. Findings highlight how PBRI, culturally grounded mentorship, and community-based support function as protective factors that foster academic persistence, advocacy, and a redefinition of success beyond deficit-based narratives. The paper argues that Black male success in PSE must be understood not as exceptional but as evidence of agency and resistance within structurally inequitable institutions, and it concludes with implications for curriculum, mentorship, and institutional policy in Canadian higher education. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Race and Ethnicity Without Diversity)
18 pages, 285 KB  
Article
The Seeds Are Sown: Towards Interracial Inclusivity at a UK Predominantly White Institution
by Christopher Jones and Jordan Mullard
Soc. Sci. 2026, 15(1), 36; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci15010036 - 9 Jan 2026
Viewed by 972
Abstract
The mental distress experienced by ethnic minority students studying at predominantly White institutions is well documented. These institutions and their spaces can be hostile environments for ethnic minority students and staff, leading to low retention, engagement and poor mental health. Often posited through [...] Read more.
The mental distress experienced by ethnic minority students studying at predominantly White institutions is well documented. These institutions and their spaces can be hostile environments for ethnic minority students and staff, leading to low retention, engagement and poor mental health. Often posited through a deficit lens, we challenge models that situate the experiences of what we call the resilient minority (ReM)—racialised ethnic groups—into categories to be fixed. By deploying qualitative research into Black and White university student experiences of racial inclusion, we explore alternative views to building stronger, more resilient communities. By further theorising interracial anxiety (the increased levels of anxiety felt by White people when interacting with ReM or experienced by ReM in predominantly White contexts), we highlight how decolonisation, built on representation and recognition, not only generates important discussions about interracial anxiety but also creates opportunities for change. We evidence how the representation of ReM groups through a Black feminist and decolonial critique in predominantly White contexts can reduce anxiety, promote wellbeing and potentially foster interracial inclusivity in higher education. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Race and Ethnicity Without Diversity)
17 pages, 518 KB  
Article
Responding to Racism in the Academy: Black Women Professors Engaging in Public Discourse
by Kelsey Bogard, Ruqayyah Perkins-Williams and Mary Howard-Hamilton
Soc. Sci. 2025, 14(12), 730; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14120730 - 18 Dec 2025
Viewed by 1897
Abstract
Perspectives on race and gender from Black women professors in higher education today are shaped by their lived experiences navigating both systemic racism and sexism within academia. These perspectives often reflect a unique intersectional understanding of institutional challenges, resilience, and advocacy for equity. [...] Read more.
Perspectives on race and gender from Black women professors in higher education today are shaped by their lived experiences navigating both systemic racism and sexism within academia. These perspectives often reflect a unique intersectional understanding of institutional challenges, resilience, and advocacy for equity. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Race and Ethnicity Without Diversity)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 271 KB  
Article
Beyond Metrics: Racial Identity Development as Anti-Colonial Praxis in Contested Institutional Spaces
by Dwuana Bradley, Mya Haynes, Gabriela M. Torres and Stacey Speller
Soc. Sci. 2025, 14(12), 724; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14120724 - 17 Dec 2025
Viewed by 752
Abstract
Amid escalating attacks on the diversity, equity, and inclusion, Historically Black Emerging Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HBeHSIs) represent overlooked spaces of resistance in U.S. Higher education. This study examines how faculty and administrators negotiate racial and professional identities within institutions shaped by Black liberatory traditions [...] Read more.
Amid escalating attacks on the diversity, equity, and inclusion, Historically Black Emerging Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HBeHSIs) represent overlooked spaces of resistance in U.S. Higher education. This study examines how faculty and administrators negotiate racial and professional identities within institutions shaped by Black liberatory traditions and exclusionary HSI policy. Guided by Bradley and Tillis’s Afro-Latinidades heuristic, we link psychosocial identity development to institutional praxis and anti-colonial resistance. Interviews with 10 BIPOC professionals reveal identity ork as collective praxis challenging essentialist narratives and affirming servingness beyond enrollment metrics. Five themes illustrate work as collective praxis challenging essentialist narratives and affirming servingness beyond enrollment metrics. Five themes illustrate strategies for sustaining equity-driven missions under racial retrenchment, calling for renewed commitments to justice-centered higher education. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Race and Ethnicity Without Diversity)
18 pages, 375 KB  
Article
Individuality Rooted in Difference: Hair and Identity from the Margins
by Saran Donahoo
Soc. Sci. 2025, 14(11), 666; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14110666 - 14 Nov 2025
Viewed by 1952
Abstract
Inspired by the bans on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts in the U.S., this article considers how DEI influences individualism. This study uses literature on Black racial identity development and the conceptual lens of individualism to examine how Black women define themselves. [...] Read more.
Inspired by the bans on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts in the U.S., this article considers how DEI influences individualism. This study uses literature on Black racial identity development and the conceptual lens of individualism to examine how Black women define themselves. The data used for this study came from 22 college-educated Black women who discussed their paths towards wearing their natural hair, which included personalized descriptions of the ways that race, gender, White beauty norms, workplace expectations, and the perspectives of others influenced this process. The narratives provided by these Black women reveal that DEI helps to promote their individual identity development by helping them to sort through the various messages and opinions to arrive at both a hairstyle and an identity that corresponds to their character. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Race and Ethnicity Without Diversity)

Other

Jump to: Research

21 pages, 875 KB  
Systematic Review
Experiences and Academic Success of Black Students with Disabilities in Higher Education
by Prilly Bicknell-Hersco
Soc. Sci. 2026, 15(2), 103; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci15020103 - 9 Feb 2026
Viewed by 1240
Abstract
This systematic literature review provides an extensive synthesis of the empirical, theoretical, and policy research on Black students with disabilities in higher education in Canada and the United States. Grounded in the Preferred Reporting Items to Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses approach, this study [...] Read more.
This systematic literature review provides an extensive synthesis of the empirical, theoretical, and policy research on Black students with disabilities in higher education in Canada and the United States. Grounded in the Preferred Reporting Items to Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses approach, this study incorporates the perspectives of critical race theory, Black feminist thought, disability studies in education, and disability critical race theory to examine racism and ableism as mutual, structuralizing forces. The results indicate that Black students with disabilities experience a spectrum of systemic marginalization across the stages of education, including racialized academic tracking, Eurocentric and inaccessible curriculum, unequal accommodation practices and microaggressions. These barriers are intensified by financial precarity, mental health inequities, and a radical absence of representation in faculty and institutional administrations. The results suggest that institutional approaches frequently isolate race and disability, culminating in policies that overlook intersectional harm. This study concludes that transformative changes must extend beyond compliance-driven diversity and access programs to encompass justice-driven intersectional reforms in pedagogy, policy, funding, and institutional culture. The findings underscore the need to prioritize Black students with disabilities when redesigning higher education systems to foster substantive equity and inclusion. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Race and Ethnicity Without Diversity)
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 316 KB  
Essay
This Fragile New World: Tales of Futures Without DEI in Higher Education
by Sosanya Jones
Soc. Sci. 2025, 14(12), 695; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14120695 - 2 Dec 2025
Viewed by 1690
Abstract
Since the 2023 Supreme Court decision, which declared race-conscious affirmative action in college admissions unconstitutional, the national climate for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts, especially those addressing racial and ethnic disparities in higher education, has undergone a dramatic shift. Most recently, presidential [...] Read more.
Since the 2023 Supreme Court decision, which declared race-conscious affirmative action in college admissions unconstitutional, the national climate for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts, especially those addressing racial and ethnic disparities in higher education, has undergone a dramatic shift. Most recently, presidential executive orders and state legislation aimed at dismantling DEI in higher education have resulted in many colleges not only eliminating their DEI offices and staff but also any program, initiative, and funding explicitly related to race and ethnicity. Drawing on the current discourse, the author utilizes Afrofuturism and future scenario planning to construct three different fictional stories to illustrate possible impacts, challenges, and strategies for navigating a future without formal structures that support DEI in higher education. Following each story, the author provides practical strategies for how institutions, DEI professionals, and DEI advocates can navigate these potential futures to maintain support for DEI. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Race and Ethnicity Without Diversity)
Back to TopTop