Police Community Engagement and Evidence-Based Crime Reduction Strategies

A Special Issue of Social Sciences (ISSN 2076-0760) belonging to the section "Crime and Justice".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 November 2025) | Viewed by 9822

Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Criminal Justice, Radford University, Radford, VA 24142, USA
Interests: police/researcher partnerships, police/community collaboration, hot spot and problem-oriented policing, crime science, crime and place, police/crime data and technology, experimental research methodology, and program evaluation

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice, College of Arts and Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA
Interests: public perceptions of police use-of-force, crime deterrence policies, police personnel issues, and the application of Bayesian statistics in criminal justice research

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Criminal Justice, Radford University, Radford, VA 24142, USA
Interests: crime reduction approaches and strategies; crime and place; crime science; police use-of-force; police training; criminal investigations; organizational change and leadership; police and community partnerships; crime analysis; and experimental research methodology

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Police having systematic positive interactions with the community is important for building trust and legitimacy and is key for encouraging both the community and the police to be more willing to work together to prevent and reduce crime. It is particularly important now as police departments seek to improve their relationships with the community while, at the same time, implementing proactive crime reduction strategies. This Special Issue requests papers that seek to understand the opportunities and challenges that police face in carrying out proactive crime reduction strategies along with proactive community engagement. The goal of this Special Issue is to provide examples and guidance for police practitioners, city officials, and communities to work together to address crime and disorder in their communities.

Areas of inquiry might include the following: implementation by police and impacts on organizational culture and change; impacts on trust in and legitimacy of the police; the impact of crime reduction/prevention efforts on community perceptions and engagement; the impact on crime and disorder. In particular, papers that focus on how police organizations combine and integrate evidence-based approaches that are problem-oriented, place-based, person-focused, and community-based are sought. Other specific areas of focus might be the use of crime analysis to support crime reduction and community engagement implementation and mechanisms that lay out expectations and hold personnel accountability for proactive crime reduction strategies and/or community engagement. Papers might include results from surveys, interviews, observations, evaluations, and case studies. We also encourage submissions that consider the cross-national examination of these concepts.

Dr. Rachel Boba Santos
Dr. Scott M. Mourtgos
Dr. Roberto G Santos
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-anonymized peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Social Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • community engagement
  • evidence-based policing
  • proactive crime reduction
  • crime prevention
  • police legitimacy
  • police organization
  • police culture
  • crime analysis

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

23 pages, 1077 KB  
Article
Community Policing and Evidence-Based Strategies for Livestock Theft Reduction in South Africa
by Willie Clack
Soc. Sci. 2026, 15(2), 108; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci15020108 - 11 Feb 2026
Viewed by 2018
Abstract
Livestock theft remains a deeply entrenched and economically damaging form of rural crime in South Africa, with significant implications for food security, community trust, and agricultural sustainability. This exploratory study critically evaluates the effectiveness of Livestock Theft Prevention Forums (LTPFs), established in 1995, [...] Read more.
Livestock theft remains a deeply entrenched and economically damaging form of rural crime in South Africa, with significant implications for food security, community trust, and agricultural sustainability. This exploratory study critically evaluates the effectiveness of Livestock Theft Prevention Forums (LTPFs), established in 1995, as a community policing mechanism. Using a mixed-methods approach, the research integrates quantitative survey data from 628 respondents—primarily livestock producers—with qualitative insights from key stakeholders, including members of the South African Police Service (SAPS). The analysis spans multiple dimensions: crime trends, recovery rates, stakeholder engagement, technological adoption, and forum functionality. Findings reveal that while formal reporting of theft has improved, recovery rates remain stagnant, and financial losses continue to rise. Technological interventions, such as Global Positioning System (GPS) tracking and closed-circuit television networks, are increasingly adopted but remain inaccessible to many emerging farmers. Awareness and participation in LTPFs are uneven across provinces, with local forums often inactive and poorly coordinated. The exploratory study concludes that although LTPFs hold promise as participatory governance platforms, their impact is constrained by structural inequalities, limited institutional capacity, and historical mistrust. Strengthening these forums requires inclusive outreach, improved communication, and integration of evidence-based policing within broader rural development strategies. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 4014 KB  
Article
A Targeted Crime Reduction Implementation: An Analysis of Immediate Effects and Long-Term Sustainability
by Ana Ortiz Salazar, Elizabeth Dotson and Loren Atherley
Soc. Sci. 2026, 15(1), 32; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci15010032 - 7 Jan 2026
Viewed by 2209
Abstract
Crime in Seattle, WA (USA), has long been concentrated in a few discrete geographic areas. This study examines the impact of a one-year place-based soft policing intervention to reduce crime and disorder in these two acutely affected areas: The Blade and Little Saigon. [...] Read more.
Crime in Seattle, WA (USA), has long been concentrated in a few discrete geographic areas. This study examines the impact of a one-year place-based soft policing intervention to reduce crime and disorder in these two acutely affected areas: The Blade and Little Saigon. Employing Bayesian Structural Time Series (BSTS) to estimate the treatment effect of the intervention on several crimes and calls for service measures, we find mixed results with important implications. One area responded with significant reductions in crime and community-driven calls for service. The second treatment area did not reflect these effects, suggesting that key contextual variations may influence performance of Problem-Oriented Policing treatments. Additionally, treatment effects in the first location were observed to partially diminish over time, indicating a point of diminishing returns. This study suggests that a multi-partner soft policing approach to crime reduction is effective; however, treatment must be tailored to local context, and treatment areas should be expected to adjust, necessitating programed variability to maintain treatment efficacy. A “test-as-you-go” approach is critical to optimal performance. Implications for future place-based interventions are discussed. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 865 KB  
Article
Super-Cocooning Against Property Crime: Do Visual Primes Affect Support and Does Race Matter
by Hunter M. Boehme and Brandon Tregle
Soc. Sci. 2025, 14(7), 429; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14070429 - 13 Jul 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1358
Abstract
American citizens are significantly more likely to experience property crime victimization than violent crime victimization. During a staffing crisis, police prioritize limited resources in combating serious crime; however, property crimes remain impactful to the community. Therefore, agencies need to consider innovative ways to [...] Read more.
American citizens are significantly more likely to experience property crime victimization than violent crime victimization. During a staffing crisis, police prioritize limited resources in combating serious crime; however, property crimes remain impactful to the community. Therefore, agencies need to consider innovative ways to control property crime, such as “super-cocooning” strategies that alert residents to recent offenses. These strategies intend to empower the community to implement guardianship and crime prevention measures. For these strategies to be effective, they require public buy-in and support. The present study implements a preregistered information provision survey experiment (N = 2412), similar to the strategy of super-cocooning, to assess whether the public is more likely to support such strategies to combat property crime. Although the sample held overall high support of this strategy, exposure to a super-cocooning door hanger prime produced no significant changes in perceived effectiveness. However, there was observed racial heterogeneity in the treatments: non-White respondents assigned to the treatment relative to White respondents experienced significantly increased support of super-cocooning strategies. Implications for light-footprint crime control strategies, particularly during a staffing crisis, are discussed. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

19 pages, 400 KB  
Review
Walking and Biking the Beat: Operationalizing Proactive Community Engagement
by Ethan M. Humphrey, Narelle S. Hickmon, Nathan Cronin and Rachel B. Santos
Soc. Sci. 2026, 15(2), 122; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci15020122 - 14 Feb 2026
Viewed by 1713
Abstract
Community-oriented policing (COP) has long been hailed as an approach to enhancing community trust in police, addressing community problems proactively rather than reactively, and fostering police-community engagement. However, some law enforcement agencies experience difficulty in translating the broad philosophy of COP into a [...] Read more.
Community-oriented policing (COP) has long been hailed as an approach to enhancing community trust in police, addressing community problems proactively rather than reactively, and fostering police-community engagement. However, some law enforcement agencies experience difficulty in translating the broad philosophy of COP into a practical and actionable strategy. Agencies cannot expect to fulfill COP objectives without a structured plan and accountability for achieving this goal. Therefore, drawing on existing themes for operationalizing proactive community engagement, this paper brings current research and best practices together to present a set of evidence-based strategies for COP foot and bike patrols. We highlight relevant considerations and tips that may be underscored in the minutiae of implementation within the COP foot and bike patrol process, yet remain critical to success. By operationalizing COP foot and bike patrols at several stages, the authors aim to assist agencies in striving for more than just symbolic or temporary approaches to COP. Full article
Back to TopTop