Social Work on Community Practice and Child Protection

A special issue of Social Sciences (ISSN 2076-0760).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 October 2025) | Viewed by 3280

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Social Work and Social Policy, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
Interests: community practice and child protection; counter oppressive practice; cross-cultural social work; social policy; whiteness and social work; full service schools; rural and remote social work practice; decolonising social work

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Gender Studies and Criminology, The University of Otago, Sociology, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand
Interests: māori social services development; alternative care; social service agencies; care and protection

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Population Health and Social Work, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
Interests: child protection; social work; strategic partnership; policy making

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The social work approach to child protection in many jurisdictions is to manage the risk of harm to children. It is well known that poverty, substance abuse and violence in the home, for example, contribute to risks to the safety of children and for Indigenous communities these social issues are closely linked to the history of colonisation.  The risk management approach often takes the form of removing the child from risk that is perceived or has occurred and again for Indigenous communities these responses are both a failure to address colonialism’s effects as well as a continuation of colonial practice, which has resulted in an over representation of Indigenous children in care. Less frequently used are measures designed to prevent harm through anticipating the many risks children and their families face. What is often missed in this seemingly simple equation is what can contribute to the ‘best interests of the child’ in terms of ensuring no further harm—that is, the actions, resources and supports that can be mobilised from others in the children’s environment and what supports their families and others need in order to do so. For Indigenous communities, for example, in Aotearoa New Zealand, child protection may have different starting points that link matauranga (knowledges) and practices (tikanga and kawa) that are specifically drawn from their communities. Social work as a practice has a wide and deep brief with a broad skill set informed by multidisciplinary knowledge. The social work profession requires its members to apply these skills and knowledges across the spectrum of need and in culturally responsive ways to deliver the best possible outcomes for the people with whom they work. This includes attending to the multiplicity of circumstances and designing their strategies accordingly. The harm or risk management approach as a strategy of tertiary prevention is one essential measure, but there are many others which sit within the primary and secondary prevention approaches. We invite contributions which provide examples of how social work contributes to protecting children in culturally responsive and appropriate ways through these additional strategies.

Dr. Susan Young
Shayne Walker
Dr. Celine Harrison
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Social Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • developmental community work
  • best interests of the child
  • policy practice
  • risk prevention
  • risk management
  • primary, secondary and tertiary prevention
  • cultural responsiveness

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

15 pages, 237 KB  
Article
We Fled Gunfire to Protect Our Children: Reimagining Child Protection in Australia for South Sudanese Communities
by Caroline Speirs and Maria Harries
Soc. Sci. 2026, 15(3), 213; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci15030213 - 23 Mar 2026
Viewed by 325
Abstract
This article reports on action research which sought the perspectives of South Sudanese families and communities about their experiences and understanding of child protection. The research was grounded in cycles of interviews, consultation, and participation observation with a total of ninety-seven participants which [...] Read more.
This article reports on action research which sought the perspectives of South Sudanese families and communities about their experiences and understanding of child protection. The research was grounded in cycles of interviews, consultation, and participation observation with a total of ninety-seven participants which included South Sudanese leaders and families in Australia and in Uganda. The resulting data offers a layered insight into the pressures families navigate and the strengths on which they draw to keep children connected to community and culture in Australia and the importance they place on community led approaches in which protection and safety are understood as collective responsibilities. The findings show that the collective strengths they highlight are often misunderstood within Western child protection systems. The paper concludes that meaningful partnership and developmental ways of working are essential for building trust and designing approaches that keep children safe within culture. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Social Work on Community Practice and Child Protection)
17 pages, 1521 KB  
Article
Religion and Continuity for Children in Care—An Examination of Public Views in 40 Countries
by Zacky Dhaffa Pratama and Marit Skivenes
Soc. Sci. 2026, 15(1), 30; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci15010030 - 6 Jan 2026
Viewed by 600
Abstract
This comparative study, the first to date, examines how representative samples of citizens across 40 OECD countries (N = 41,232) balance religion and child welfare when deciding whether to move a five-year-old thriving in foster care to match parental religion. Using a vignette [...] Read more.
This comparative study, the first to date, examines how representative samples of citizens across 40 OECD countries (N = 41,232) balance religion and child welfare when deciding whether to move a five-year-old thriving in foster care to match parental religion. Using a vignette experiment and six hypotheses, the analysis links religiosity, perceived religious rights, authoritarian values, institutional context, and confidence in child protection to placement preferences. A large majority (88%) would not move the child, prioritising stability and well-being. The results show a trust “paradox” in which higher confidence in child protection correlates with support for moving the child. Justifications show broad appeal to the best interest principle across opposing choices. Deference to professional assessment varies markedly across countries, indicating divergent authority of social work expertise. Findings underscore the need to operationalise the best interests standard and to account for institutional context, while policymakers should recognise stable placements as the public default. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Social Work on Community Practice and Child Protection)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

25 pages, 330 KB  
Article
Shifting Power at the Front Door: State–Community Decision-Making Partnerships in Child Protection
by Emily Keddell, Andrew Rudolph, Shayne Walker, Karen Hale, Jude Hughes, Jonette Chapman and William Kaipo
Soc. Sci. 2026, 15(1), 5; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci15010005 - 22 Dec 2025
Viewed by 774
Abstract
Inequities for Indigenous people in child protection systems are well established. One avenue for addressing these inequities is at the ‘front door’ of child protection, when reports are first made to statutory child protection services. This article reports on a formative evaluation of [...] Read more.
Inequities for Indigenous people in child protection systems are well established. One avenue for addressing these inequities is at the ‘front door’ of child protection, when reports are first made to statutory child protection services. This article reports on a formative evaluation of a shared decision-making forum in a small city in Aotearoa New Zealand, where a community Māori organisation meets to make initial decisions about reports together with the statutory agency. The aim is to improve information quality by bringing local, relational knowledge to the decision and provide a service response to those cases that are ‘closed’. The findings are that initial enablers were the policy context that emphasized community devolution, consensus on problems and aims, relationships between leaders in both organisations, and high community investment. Early challenges were a reluctance from some workers to engage in the process, lack of agreed processes, and fears of simply replicating the statutory agency in the community. Current enablers following a period of establishment were relationships of trust, the development of practice processes, commitment to review, increased information sharing, community location and leadership, and an alignment with practitioners’ values. Challenges were conflicts about moderate risk situations, lack of other key services, inconsistent attendance, and authority conflicts over legal mandates and information sharing practices, especially relating to high-acuity situations. The implications are that organisational, policy, and resourcing level changes and relationships from front-line workers to leaders are essential for moving institutional logics. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Social Work on Community Practice and Child Protection)

Other

Jump to: Research

13 pages, 236 KB  
Viewpoint
Building Student and Community Engagement in Schools Through Social Work Placements to Support Children’s Wellbeing
by Erica Russ, Inga Lie and Lynn Berger
Soc. Sci. 2026, 15(1), 35; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci15010035 - 8 Jan 2026
Viewed by 783
Abstract
Schools focus on the education of students, but it is recognised that student engagement and educational achievement are enhanced where student wellbeing is considered. Student wellbeing can be supported both in school and through connections to the school and broader community. While teachers [...] Read more.
Schools focus on the education of students, but it is recognised that student engagement and educational achievement are enhanced where student wellbeing is considered. Student wellbeing can be supported both in school and through connections to the school and broader community. While teachers seek to support student wellbeing, they are often ill-equipped, given workload and educational focus, limiting their capacity to address student wellbeing needs, particularly those linked to social or community issues. School social workers provide a valuable adjunct to the work of educators, enabling a greater focus on wellbeing through the provision of targeted psychosocial support and community engagement that recognises and responds to broader factors impacting education achievement. In schools without social workers, social work student placements can provide opportunities to introduce school communities to the value and benefits social workers offer. This practice paper explores examples of school-based social work student placements offered through the social work field education program at one regional Australian University, including activities, strategies undertaken, and identified benefits of social work student placements. With indicated benefits, it is argued that the inclusion of social workers in schools adds value to the educational team, supporting children’s wellbeing and thereby contributing to improved educational engagement and achievement. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Social Work on Community Practice and Child Protection)
Back to TopTop