Mass Spectrometry-Based Metabolomics for Advancing Personalized Medicine

A special issue of Metabolites (ISSN 2218-1989). This special issue belongs to the section "Advances in Metabolomics".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 October 2026 | Viewed by 3158

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Personalized Medicine and Rare Diseases, Institute of Biomedical Research—MedFuture, “Iuliu Hațieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Cluj-Napoca, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Interests: integrated omics (proteomics and metabolomics); personalized medicine; separation science; mass spectrometry
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Personalized Medicine and Rare Diseases, Institute of Biomedical Research—MedFuture, “Iuliu Hațieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Cluj-Napoca, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Interests: metabolomics; separation science; mass spectrometry; chiral analysis

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Along with technological advancements in the bioanalytical field, modern metabolomics techniques are powerful tools capable of offering comprehensive snapshots of metabolic changes occurring in the human body, providing critical insights into physiological processes, disease pathogenesis, and potential biomarkers for diagnosis and treatment. Translating these observations to clinical practice often involves deciphering intricate disease mechanisms. Together with other “omics” technologies, metabolomics plays a pivotal role in personalized medicine, reflecting individual responses to diseases or treatments.

This Special Issue of Metabolites is focused on mass-spectrometry-based metabolomics in the context of personalized medicine, and investigators are invited to present their relevant research results. This Special Issue aims to focus on relevant advancements using mass spectrometry tools for metabolomic research, with a focus on personalized medicine. These topics may include biomarker discovery and validation for diagnosis and disease stratification, together with methodological advancements and integration with other “omics” technologies to better understand metabolic pathway alterations. 

Prof. Dr. Cristina Adela Iuga
Dr. Radu-Cristian Moldovan
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Metabolites is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • mass spectrometry-based metabolomics
  • integrated-omics
  • personalized medicine
  • biomarker discovery

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

17 pages, 582 KB  
Article
Integrated Redox Profiling: Simultaneous Determination of Ubiquinol-10, Ubiquinone-10, and Alpha-Lipoic Acid in Serum by LC-MS/MS
by Domniki Gallou, Olga Begou, Georgios Theodoridis and Helen Gika
Metabolites 2026, 16(5), 344; https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo16050344 - 20 May 2026
Viewed by 138
Abstract
Background: Coenzyme Q10 and Alpha-lipoic acid are two essential antioxidants involved in numerous physiological processes, including cellular energy production and the mitigation of oxidative stress. Their accurate quantification is critical for understanding their biological roles and therapeutic potential. Herein, an RPLC-MS/MS [...] Read more.
Background: Coenzyme Q10 and Alpha-lipoic acid are two essential antioxidants involved in numerous physiological processes, including cellular energy production and the mitigation of oxidative stress. Their accurate quantification is critical for understanding their biological roles and therapeutic potential. Herein, an RPLC-MS/MS method for the rapid and simultaneous determination of ubiquinone-10 (CoQ10), the reduced form ubiquinol-10 (CoQ10H2), and Alpha-lipoic acid (ALA) in human serum was developed and validated. Methods: Chromatographic separation was performed on a Waters ACQUITY UPLC HSS T3 column (2.1 mm × 150 mm, i.d. 1.7 μm). Detection was performed on a SCIEX Triple Quad 6500+ system, applying multiple reaction monitoring (MRM). Single-phase protein precipitation was selected as the sample preparation protocol, providing satisfactory recovery for the analytes. Results: The method was linear over the concentration of 53.8–613 ng/mL for CoQ10H2, 23.1–263 ng/mL for CoQ10 and 7.7–87.6 ng/mL for ALA. Intra- and inter-day accuracy was found to be between 81.8 and 109% and 84.4 to 106%, respectively, for all analytes, while intra- and inter-day precision was found to vary from 0.8% to 9.9% %RSD and 2.0% to 7.7% %RSD, respectively. A limit of quantitation (LOQ) of 4.2 ng/mL was found for CoQ10H2, 1.7 ng/mL for CoQ10 and 0.7 ng/mL for ALA. Conclusions: The developed LC-MS/MS method enables rapid, sensitive and simultaneous quantification of CoQ10H2, CoQ10, and ALA in human serum with satisfactory accuracy, precision and sensitivity. The method is suitable for bioanalytical applications and was successfully applied to the analysis of 10 real samples obtained from healthy volunteers. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

13 pages, 3305 KB  
Article
Comparison of Mass Spectrometry Imaging by Desorption Electrospray Ionization (DESI) and Desorption Electro-Flow Focusing Ionization (DEFFI)
by Yunshuo Tian, Ruolun Wei, Yifan Meng and Richard N. Zare
Metabolites 2026, 16(4), 219; https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo16040219 - 27 Mar 2026
Viewed by 689
Abstract
Background: Among atmospheric-pressure mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) methods, desorption electrospray ionization (DESI) and desorption electro-flow focusing ionization (DEFFI) represent cost-effective, high-throughput approaches that utilize pneumatically assisted charged solvent droplets to directly desorb and ionize analytes from sample surfaces. Methods and Results: In this [...] Read more.
Background: Among atmospheric-pressure mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) methods, desorption electrospray ionization (DESI) and desorption electro-flow focusing ionization (DEFFI) represent cost-effective, high-throughput approaches that utilize pneumatically assisted charged solvent droplets to directly desorb and ionize analytes from sample surfaces. Methods and Results: In this study, we systematically compare the performance of conventional DESI-MSI with previously reported DEFFI-MSI configurations on the Orbitrap mass spectrometer platform, focusing on evaluating the lateral spatial resolution, signal intensity, and imaging speed. By scanning a standard patterned sample which has sharp edges, DESI-MSI achieved a spatial resolution of 70 µm, while DEFFI-MSI achieved 15 µm (approximately 4.7-fold improvement). For the representative ion at m/z 782.5621, DEFFI-MSI demonstrated significantly higher signal intensity across solvent flow rates ranging from 0.5 to 1.5 µL min−1. The enhanced ion yield directly translates to improved Orbitrap-based MSI efficiency: in both negative- and positive-ion modes, DEFFI generates rich full-scan mass spectra within the maximum 10 ms ion injection time, whereas DESI produces weaker mass spectra under the same conditions. Conclusions: Taken together, these results quantify the key performance metrics between DESI-MSI and DEFFI-MSI, demonstrating that DEFFI is the preferred method on Orbitrap-based MSI, because it simultaneously enhances spatial resolution, signal intensity, and imaging speed. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 6441 KB  
Article
Tissue-Based Metabolomic Profiling of Endometrial Cancer and Hyperplasia
by Khalid Akkour, Afshan Masood, Maha Al Mogren, Reem H. AlMalki, Assim A. Alfadda, Salini Scaria Joy, Ali Bassi, Hani Alhalal, Maria Arafah, Othman Mahmoud Othman, Hadeel Mohammad Awwad, Anas M. Abdel Rahman and Hicham Benabdelkamel
Metabolites 2025, 15(7), 458; https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo15070458 - 5 Jul 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1649
Abstract
Background: Endometrial cancer (EC) is the sixth most common cancer among women globally, with an estimated 420,000 new cases diagnosed annually. Methods: This study comprised patients with endometrial cancer (EC) (n = 17), hyperplasia (HY) (n = 17), and controls (CO) [...] Read more.
Background: Endometrial cancer (EC) is the sixth most common cancer among women globally, with an estimated 420,000 new cases diagnosed annually. Methods: This study comprised patients with endometrial cancer (EC) (n = 17), hyperplasia (HY) (n = 17), and controls (CO) (n = 20). Tissue was collected from the endometrium of all 54 patients, including patients with HY, EC, and CO, who underwent total hysterectomy. EC and HY diagnoses were confirmed based on histological examination. Untargeted metabolomics profiling was conducted using LC-HRMS. The partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) and orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) models were used for univariate and multivariate statistical analysis. The fitness of the model (R2Y) and predictive ability (Q2) were used to create OPLS-DA models. ROC analysis was carried out, followed by network analysis using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis. Results: The top metabolites that can discriminate EC and HY from CO were identified. This revealed a decrease in the levels of the lipid species, specifically phosphatidic acid (PA) (PA (14:1/14:0), PA(10:0/17:0), PA(18:1-O(12,13)/12:0)), PG(a-13:0/a-13:0), ganglioside GA1 (d18:1/18:1), PS(14:1/14:0), TG(20:0/18:4/14:1), and CDP-DG(PGF2alpha/18:2), while the levels of 3-Dehydro-L-gulonate, Uridine diphosphate-N-acetylglucosamine, ganglioside GT2 (d18:1/14:0), gamma-glutamyl glutamic acid and oxidized glutathione were increased in cases of EC and HY as compared to CO. Bioinformatics analysis, specifically using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA), revealed distinct pathway enrichments for EC and HY. For EC, the most highly scored pathways were associated with cell-to-cell signaling and interaction, skeletal and muscular system development and function, and small-molecule biochemistry. In contrast, HY cases showed the highest scoring pathways related to inflammatory disease, inflammatory response, and organismal injury and abnormalities. Conclusions: Developing sensitive biomarkers could improve diagnosis and guide treatment decisions, particularly in identifying which patients with HY may safely avoid hysterectomy and be managed with hormonal therapy. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop