Lymphatics

Bone marrow involvement in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma is an adverse prognostic factor; therefore, its detection is necessary at the time of diagnosis and during follow-up. This study evaluates the concordance between flow cytometry (FC) and bone marrow biopsy (BMB) in detecting bone marrow involvement in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas as well as their prognostic relevance in a Chilean cohort. A total of 202 samples from 172 patients with diffuse large B-cell (DLBCL), follicular (FL), marginal-zone (MZL), and mantle cell (MCL) lymphoma were retrospectively analyzed; all patients underwent simultaneous BMB and FC. Bone marrow involvement was identified in 29% of samples via BMB and in 40% via FC, with an overall concordance of 89% (kappa: 0.75), which was lower in mantle cell lymphoma. Eleven percent of cases showed BMB-FC+ discordance, generally associated with low tumor burden. In survival analyses, the BMB+/FC+ group exhibited shorter overall and progression-free survival, and concordant involvement was associated with a higher risk of mortality and progression, particularly among patients with an intermediate or high IPI. Involvement detected exclusively by FC did not have a significant prognostic impact. These findings support the role of FC as a complementary or alternative diagnostic tool in settings with limited resources, improving sensitivity for detecting bone marrow involvement without compromising clinical relevance.

Cervical lymph node metastases are major prognostic determinants in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), and neck dissection (ND) has long been central to regional control. As ND has evolved from radical to selective procedures, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have emerged as a fourth treatment pillar, reframing tumor-draining lymph nodes (TDLNs) as active immune organs rather than passive conduits of metastatic spread. This narrative review synthesizes surgical, immunologic, and translational evidence on how ND and cervical irradiation interact with immunotherapy. It also examines the historical development of ND, the immunologic structure and function of cervical TDLNs, and the use of neoadjuvant, perioperative, and recurrent/metastatic immunotherapy in HNSCC. Preclinical and early clinical observations suggest that ablating or heavily irradiating non-involved nodal basins may attenuate ICI efficacy by disrupting antigen presentation, progenitor exhausted CD8⁺ T (Tpex) cell pools, and effector recirculation, supporting the conceptual model of an “immune desert neck.” The review critically appraises timing (pre- versus post-immunotherapy ND), response-adapted or de-escalated surgery, and imaging, tissue-based, and circulating biomarkers to guide individualized management. Current evidence does not support abandoning elective or therapeutic ND, but does highlight the need for biomarker-driven, lymphatic-sparing trials to redefine when ND is essential, modifiable, or potentially avoidable in immunotherapy-treated HNSCC.

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare, aggressive endocrine malignancy with poor survival outcomes and high recurrence rates. Whilst surgical resection is the cornerstone of curative treatment, the role of lymphadenectomy remains debated. “Nodes of contention” in ACC management center on balancing accurate staging and potential oncologic benefit against added operative time, complexity, and morbidity. We reviewed the available published literature over the last 20 years, including retrospective series, to evaluate the prognostic and therapeutic significance of lymphadenectomy in ACC. Though systematic lymph node dissection improves staging accuracy and may identify patients at higher risk who could benefit from adjuvant therapy, evidence demonstrating a survival benefit is inconsistent. This is largely due to the rarity of the condition, heterogeneity in surgical approaches, and lack of standardized nodal templates. Concerns regarding increased operative morbidity further limit widespread adoption. This review synthesizes current evidence on nodal assessment in ACC and highlights gaps in prospective data. While nodal involvement is a strong prognostic factor, the therapeutic impact of lymphadenectomy remains unclear. Prospective, multicenter trials are urgently needed to define its role in ACC management.