- Article
Background/Objectives: Long-chain fatty acids induce lipid droplet formation in several cell types including cancer cells. These lipid droplets have been shown to accumulate in various cancers and are dysregulated in many pathologies. Thus, this study was designed to examine the many unique long-chain fatty acids and their abilities to induce lipid droplet formation in cancer cells. Methods: HeLa human cervical cancer cells were incubated with individual fatty acids and live-stained for lipid droplets. This study analyzed four saturated, four monounsaturated, and nine polyunsaturated (4 omega-3, 4 omega-6, and 1 omega-9) fatty acids. This diversity of fatty acids was chosen to highlight any important non-uniform differences in the regulation of lipid droplet formation by unsaturated fatty acids. The area of the lipid droplets and the number of lipid droplets per cell were measured and compared between the different fatty acid conditions. Results: Unsaturated fatty acids induced lipid droplets differently compared to saturated fatty acids. Further, an inverse relationship was established between average area of lipid droplets and the average number of lipid droplets per cell. Finally, two perilipin genes (PLIN1/2) involved in lipid droplet formation were shown to have significantly higher expression with the two polyunsaturated fatty acids (alpha- and gamma-linolenic acid) versus the saturated fatty acid (stearic acid) condition. Conclusions: Together, different fatty acids produce structurally different lipid droplets. It will be important to further investigate the biochemistry and mechanistic differences in the formation of these lipid droplets under these specific long-chain fatty acid conditions.
30 December 2025


![Impact of unsaturation in 18-carbon fatty acids on lipid droplet formation. HeLa cells were incubated with fatty acids listed at 400 µM for 24 h or cells subjected to solvent only (control). A new live cell co-staining protocol to stain LD structures in cells that our lab developed recently was used. LDs (green, using LipidSpot488 Lipid Droplet Stain, Biotium, Fremont, CA, USA, #70065), membranes (red, using CF594 WGA, Biotium #29023-1), and nuclei (blue, using NucBlue Live Cell Stain, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA, #R37605) were visualized for each condition. LDs were visualized as described in [44]. Representative live merged images of individual cells using a 40× objective with an EVOS FL microscope (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA, AMF4300) were selected from the collection: (A) a saturated fatty acid [stearic acid (C18:0)] and (B) an unsaturated fatty acid [α-linolenic acid (α-C18:3)] showcasing the two different types of LDs formed with different fatty acid incubation. Scale bar of these two single cell images represents 75 µm. Representative images of each 18-carbon fatty acid are provided in (C). Scale bar for these images represents 100 µm. Top images of each condition are merged images of all three channels in overlay. The lower image is the green channel only of each condition highlighting the LDs present in those cells. Data are represented as box-and-whisker plots showing the Log10(X + 1) area of LDs (N ≥ 100 LDs) (D) or the Log10(X + 1) number of LDs per cell (N ≥ 20 cells) (E). The open circles (when present) are individual data points, and the x represents the mean of the condition in these graphs. These data compare all the 18-carbon chain length fatty acids from the study listed in increasing order of number of carbon–carbon double bonds: stearic (C18:0), oleic (C18:1), linoleic (C18:2), 9Z-11E-conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) (9Z, 11E-CLA C18:2), α-linolenic (α-C18:3), γ-linolenic (γ-C18:3), and stearidonic (C18:4). One-way ANOVA analysis for independent measures was performed to compare conditions in (B,C). There were significant differences with both ANOVA analyses. See Supplementary Tables S1 and S2 for detailed ANOVA results. Tukey’s HSD post hoc analysis was performed to compare all conditions. * denotes a significant Tukey’s HSD p-value < 0.01 for comparisons between individual fatty acids and control in (B,C). For all other comparisons, see details in the Tukey’s HSD post hoc analyses presented as tables in Supplementary Tables S1 and S2. Scale bar: 100 µm.](https://mdpi-res.com/lipidology/lipidology-03-00001/article_deploy/html/images/lipidology-03-00001-g001-550.jpg)


