You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
  • 23 daysTime to First Decision

All Articles (36)

Background/Objectives: Long-chain fatty acids induce lipid droplet formation in several cell types including cancer cells. These lipid droplets have been shown to accumulate in various cancers and are dysregulated in many pathologies. Thus, this study was designed to examine the many unique long-chain fatty acids and their abilities to induce lipid droplet formation in cancer cells. Methods: HeLa human cervical cancer cells were incubated with individual fatty acids and live-stained for lipid droplets. This study analyzed four saturated, four monounsaturated, and nine polyunsaturated (4 omega-3, 4 omega-6, and 1 omega-9) fatty acids. This diversity of fatty acids was chosen to highlight any important non-uniform differences in the regulation of lipid droplet formation by unsaturated fatty acids. The area of the lipid droplets and the number of lipid droplets per cell were measured and compared between the different fatty acid conditions. Results: Unsaturated fatty acids induced lipid droplets differently compared to saturated fatty acids. Further, an inverse relationship was established between average area of lipid droplets and the average number of lipid droplets per cell. Finally, two perilipin genes (PLIN1/2) involved in lipid droplet formation were shown to have significantly higher expression with the two polyunsaturated fatty acids (alpha- and gamma-linolenic acid) versus the saturated fatty acid (stearic acid) condition. Conclusions: Together, different fatty acids produce structurally different lipid droplets. It will be important to further investigate the biochemistry and mechanistic differences in the formation of these lipid droplets under these specific long-chain fatty acid conditions.

30 December 2025

Impact of unsaturation in 18-carbon fatty acids on lipid droplet formation. HeLa cells were incubated with fatty acids listed at 400 µM for 24 h or cells subjected to solvent only (control). A new live cell co-staining protocol to stain LD structures in cells that our lab developed recently was used. LDs (green, using LipidSpot488 Lipid Droplet Stain, Biotium, Fremont, CA, USA, #70065), membranes (red, using CF594 WGA, Biotium #29023-1), and nuclei (blue, using NucBlue Live Cell Stain, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA, #R37605) were visualized for each condition. LDs were visualized as described in [44]. Representative live merged images of individual cells using a 40× objective with an EVOS FL microscope (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA, AMF4300) were selected from the collection: (A) a saturated fatty acid [stearic acid (C18:0)] and (B) an unsaturated fatty acid [α-linolenic acid (α-C18:3)] showcasing the two different types of LDs formed with different fatty acid incubation. Scale bar of these two single cell images represents 75 µm. Representative images of each 18-carbon fatty acid are provided in (C). Scale bar for these images represents 100 µm. Top images of each condition are merged images of all three channels in overlay. The lower image is the green channel only of each condition highlighting the LDs present in those cells. Data are represented as box-and-whisker plots showing the Log10(X + 1) area of LDs (N ≥ 100 LDs) (D) or the Log10(X + 1) number of LDs per cell (N ≥ 20 cells) (E). The open circles (when present) are individual data points, and the x represents the mean of the condition in these graphs. These data compare all the 18-carbon chain length fatty acids from the study listed in increasing order of number of carbon–carbon double bonds: stearic (C18:0), oleic (C18:1), linoleic (C18:2), 9Z-11E-conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) (9Z, 11E-CLA C18:2), α-linolenic (α-C18:3), γ-linolenic (γ-C18:3), and stearidonic (C18:4). One-way ANOVA analysis for independent measures was performed to compare conditions in (B,C). There were significant differences with both ANOVA analyses. See Supplementary Tables S1 and S2 for detailed ANOVA results. Tukey’s HSD post hoc analysis was performed to compare all conditions. * denotes a significant Tukey’s HSD p-value < 0.01 for comparisons between individual fatty acids and control in (B,C). For all other comparisons, see details in the Tukey’s HSD post hoc analyses presented as tables in Supplementary Tables S1 and S2. Scale bar: 100 µm.

Liposomes as “Trojan Horses” in Cancer Treatment: Design, Development, and Clinical Applications

  • Juan Sabín,
  • Andrea Santisteban-Veiga and
  • Alba Costa-Santos
  • + 2 authors

Liposomes started to be studied for drug delivery in 1970s, taking advantage of their ability to encapsulate hydrophilic and hydrophobic drugs using biodegradable and biocompatible molecules. Nowadays, they remain one of the most promising strategies for drug delivery not only in cancer treatment but also in gene therapies and vaccines. The design and development of liposomal systems have evolved significantly over the past decades, moving from conventional formulations to advanced, stimulus-responsive, and multifunctional nanocarriers. Analogous to the myth of the Trojan Horse, liposomes must mislead the host immune system to reach the interior of cancer cells in order to deliver the therapeutic payload. There are many barriers that liposomes have to overcome to circulate through the bloodstream and specifically target cancer cells without damaging other tissues. Crucial parameters such as lipid composition, particle size, zeta potential, and PEGylation have been systematically optimized to enhance pharmacokinetics and biodistribution and to improve delivery efficiency. Furthermore, conjugation with antibodies, peptides, or small molecules has enabled active targeting, while stimuli such as pH, temperature, and enzymatic activity have been exploited for controlled drug release within the tumor microenvironment. Such innovations have laid the groundwork for translating liposomal formulations from the bench to clinical applications. In this paper, we evaluate the physicochemical features of liposomal design that underpin their suitability and efficacy for anticancer drug delivery. We aimed to focus on two main aspects: conducting an exhaustive review of the physicochemical parameters of liposomal drugs that have already been approved by regulatory agencies, while maintaining a pedagogical approach when explaining the key design parameters for the optimal design of liposomes in oncology in detail.

8 December 2025

Schematic representations of the main phospholipids present in liposomes and related examples. (a) General structure of phosphatidylcholine (PC) on the left and DSPC (1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine) on the right. (b) General structure of phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) on the left and DSPE (1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine) on the right. (c) General structure of phosphatidylserine (PS) on the left and DOPS (1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho-L-serine sodium salt) on the right. (d) General structure of phosphatidylglycerol (PG) on the left and DSPG (distearoyl phosphatidylglycerol) on the right. The hydrophobic tails are highlighted in blue.

Milk fatty acid (FA) synthesis and enteric methanogenesis share common biochemical pathways related to rumen fermentation patterns and microbial volatile FA production. The FA profile of milk is known to correlate with methane (CH4) emissions; thus, FA profiling has been proposed as an indirect method to predict CH4 emissions from dairy cattle. This study aimed to (1) investigate the milk FA profiles of Holstein cows to identify candidate biomarkers for predicting CH4 output (g/d), CH4 yield (g/kg dry matter intake), and CH4 intensity (g/kg energy-corrected milk), and (2) develop and compare regression models predicting CH4 emissions. Forty-eight cows, fed industry standard diets, were enrolled in an exploratory trial. Milk samples and CH4 measurements were collected thrice per day, and intake was recorded daily. Milk lipids were extracted, transesterified, and subsequently analyzed via gas–liquid chromatography. Three penalized regression models were compared for predicting CH4 emission metrics using milk FAs and management variables. Methane emission metrics corelated positively with short- and medium-chain FAs, polyunsaturated FAs, and branched-chain FAs, while monounsaturated FAs correlated negatively. Notably, this study observed novel correlations between 11-cyclohexyl-11:0; and 20:3 c5,c8,c11 and CH4 metrics (|r| = 0.58–0.79). Across all CH4 metrics, the models demonstrated high predictive accuracy (R2 = 0.71–0.87; concordance correlation coefficient = 0.83–0.93). The findings of this study indicate that milk FA profiling may be an effective method to detect CH4 emissions from cows fed industry standard diets and highlight the need for further refinement of prediction models.

2 December 2025

Heatmap summary of Spearman’s correlation coefficients between milk fatty acids (% of total fatty acid methyl esters identified) and methane output (O; g/d), yield (Y; g/kg dry matter intake), and intensity (I; g/kg energy-corrected milk). Each square represents the result of a pair of variables. The red values indicate a positive relationship between two variables, while the blue values indicate an inverse relationship between variables. Beige colors indicate weak or no linear correlation. * Denotes p-values < 0.05. ** Denotes p-values < 0.01. *** Denotes p-values < 0.001. BCFAs, branched-chain fatty acids; MUFAs, monounsaturated fatty acids; OBCFAs, odd- and branched-chain fatty acids; OCFAs, odd-chain fatty acids; PUFAs, polyunsaturated fatty acids; SFAs, saturated fatty acids; SMCFAs, short- and medium-chain fatty acids; VLCFAs, very-long-chain fatty acids.
  • Communication
  • Open Access

Background/objectives: Plant-based meat analogues (PBMAs) are designed to mimic meat products and to be cooked under similar conditions by consumers. There have been few studies into the lipid stability of PBMAs, and no published studies have investigated the effect of cooking on the lipid stability of PBMAs. Methods: This study analysed the effect of recommended cooking conditions on the lipid oxidation of three commercial chicken schnitzel PBMAs with differing fatty acid composition. Fatty acids and lipid classes were analysed using gas chromatography (GC) and capillary chromatography (Iatroscan) with flame ionisation detectors, respectively. Lipid oxidation was analysed using multiple tests, including peroxide value (POV), p-Anisidine value, acid value, and thiobarbituric acid reactive substance (TBARS) tests, which then allowed for the total oxidation (TOTOX) to be calculated. Results: Fatty acid analysis by GC showed different levels of saturated and unsaturated fatty acid contents in all PBMAs, with oleic acid (C18:1) being the most abundant (product A = 52%; product B = 62%; product C = 37%). Meanwhile, lipid class analyses by Iatroscan revealed that the oils used in the PBMAs were composed of triacylglycerol (TAG), which remained intact after cooking. Lipid oxidation tests showed no major increases between the raw and cooked PBMA. Also, the TOTOX values for each product did not increase significantly (p < 0.05) due to cooking (TOTOX values for raw/cooked product A = 9.36/9.99; product B = 5.88/6.19; product C = 11.31/11.92), suggesting a broad stability of the lipids. Conclusions: Therefore, if the on-package cooking instructions are followed for these three PBMA products, their lipid oxidation levels remain within safe limits.

25 November 2025

Recommended cooking conditions (temperature and time) for the three commercial PBMA chicken schnitzel products.

News & Conferences

Issues

Open for Submission

Editor's Choice

Get Alerted

Add your email address to receive forthcoming issues of this journal.

XFacebookLinkedIn
Lipidology - ISSN 2813-7086