Future Internet 2026, 18(6), 321; https://doi.org/10.3390/fi18060321 (registering DOI) - 12 Jun 2026
Abstract
Digital trust in online interactions is commonly established through mechanisms such as decentralized identifiers (DIDs), verifiable credentials (VCs), and digital wallets. While these technologies support the correctness of individual components, they do not by themselves establish that an interaction as a whole is
[...] Read more.
Digital trust in online interactions is commonly established through mechanisms such as decentralized identifiers (DIDs), verifiable credentials (VCs), and digital wallets. While these technologies support the correctness of individual components, they do not by themselves establish that an interaction as a whole is trustworthy. This limitation arises because real-world interactions consist of sequences of dependent steps, where inconsistencies may arise even when each step is locally valid. In this paper, we introduce the concept of executable trust, which models trust as a verifiable property of execution across complete interaction sequences. We formalize interactions as chains of TrustEvidence objects that capture step-level validity, constraint satisfaction, and cross-step dependencies. Based on this model, we show that step-level correctness alone is insufficient to characterize interaction-level trust under the stated execution assumptions. We further clarify the definition-induced modular structure of interaction-level trust and use a local failure-witness characterization to connect the formal model with scenario-based validation. We also present the Executable Trust Architecture (ETA), a five-layer architecture that operationalizes the proposed model through components for evidence generation, constraint enforcement, secure communication, and auditability. The feasibility of the approach is examined through scenario-based evaluation covering key trust properties—authenticity, integrity, privacy, and accountability—across nine scenarios comprising 68 test cases. The evaluation illustrates cases in which cross-step violations that pass conventional step-level verification are reflected as failures of ETA’s sequence-aware trust conditions under the evaluated assumptions.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cybersecurity)
