Flavor Perception in Food: Aroma, Taste, Texture Interactions and Effects of Processing

A special issue of Foods (ISSN 2304-8158). This special issue belongs to the section "Food Physics and (Bio)Chemistry".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (15 June 2023) | Viewed by 11301

Special Issue Editors

National Engineering Research Center of Seafood, School of Food Science and Technology, Dalian Polytechnic University, Dalian 116034, China
Interests: food flavor; quality control; aquatic product processing

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Food Science and Technology, Dalian Polytechnic University, Dalian, China
Interests: flavor omics; sensory omics; off-odor control; flavor release; aroma perception; multi-sensory interaction perception; aroma visualization; aroma perception prediction

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Aroma and taste play significant roles in flavor perception, and flavor perception also affects whether food products are well-received by consumers. However, many interactions, including aroma–taste, aroma–texture, and taste–texture interactions, between a food and its food ingredients affect the final perception. Moreover, the composition of proteins, lipids, carbohydrates, and other components affect the release or retention of flavor compounds. Changing the protein, starch, and fat contents modifies the overall perception of a mixture of flavor compounds. Specifically, many complex physicochemical reactions during processing will change the flavor and texture of food. In this Special Issue, original research articles and reviews are welcome. Research may include (but are not limited to) the following topics: traditional processing (such as heating, salting, drying, smoking, natural fermentation, etc.); modern processing (such as ultra-high-pressure processing, low‐salt fermentation, rapid freezing–thawing, etc.); and their effects on the interactions among aroma, taste, and texture.

Dr. Lei Qin
Dr. Xuhui Huang
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Foods is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2900 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • flavor perception
  • interaction
  • effects of processing
  • aroma
  • taste

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

17 pages, 2660 KiB  
Article
Bos indicus Carcasses Suspended by the Pelvic Bone Require a Shorter Aging Time to Meet Consumer Expectations Regarding Meat Quality
by Welder Baldassini, Marcelo Coutinho, Gregori Rovadoscki, Bruna Menezes, Murilo Tagiariolli, Juliana Torrecilhas, Júlia Leonel, Guilherme Pereira, Rogério Curi, Otávio Machado Neto and Luis Artur Chardulo
Foods 2023, 12(5), 930; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12050930 - 22 Feb 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2724
Abstract
This study evaluated the effects of hanging the carcass by the Achilles tendon (AS) versus pelvic suspension (PS) on meat quality traits. Bos indicus carcasses of two distinct biological types/sex categories comprised 10 young Brangus heifers and 10 Nellore bulls which were finished [...] Read more.
This study evaluated the effects of hanging the carcass by the Achilles tendon (AS) versus pelvic suspension (PS) on meat quality traits. Bos indicus carcasses of two distinct biological types/sex categories comprised 10 young Brangus heifers and 10 Nellore bulls which were finished in a feedlot. Half-carcasses of each biological type/sex category were randomly hung using Achilles suspension (n = 20, AS) or pelvic suspension (n = 20, PS) for 48 h. At boning, longissimus samples were collected for evaluation by untrained consumers for tenderness, liking of flavor, juiciness and overall acceptability, after aging for 5 or 15 days. Objective samples were also tested for shear force (SF), Minolta meat colour, ultimate pH, cooking loss (CL) and purge loss (PL). There was a positive effect (p < 0.01) of PS on the sensory tenderness of Nellore bulls and Brangus heifers aged for 5 days compared to the AS method. At 15 days of aging, difference in sensory tenderness was observed (p < 0.05) in either group. Additionally, an interaction occurred between the suspension method and the aging of Nellore beef (p < 0.05) on liking of flavor, juiciness and overall acceptance, while the same effects were not observed for Brangus beef (p > 0.05). Nellore carcasses submitted to PS tended (p = 0.06) to produce more tender meat than those submitted to AS (SF = 44.62 ± 6.96 vs. 50.41 ± 8.04 N), and lower CL (p < 0.05) were found (27.7 vs. 30.9%). Carcass-suspension methods did not influence meat color, pH or PL in either group (p > 0.05). The PS contributes to improve the quality of Bos indicus bulls loins; in addition, this method allows a reduction in the aging time from 15 to 5 days, and it can be used to supply meat consumer markets which accept a certain level of eating quality. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

17 pages, 2508 KiB  
Article
A Comparison between the Egg Yolk Flavor of Indigenous 2 Breeds and Commercial Laying Hens Based on Sensory Evaluation, Artificial Sensors, and GC-MS
by Li-Bing Gao, Uchechukwu Edna Obianwuna, Hai-Jun Zhang, Kai Qiu, Shu-Geng Wu, Guang-Hai Qi and Jing Wang
Foods 2022, 11(24), 4027; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11244027 - 13 Dec 2022
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 1837
Abstract
The focus of this study was to compare the yolk flavor of eggs from laying hens of Chinese indigenous and commercial, based on detection of volatile compounds, fatty acids, and texture characteristics determination, using sensory evaluation, artificial sensors (electronic nose (E-nose), electronic tongue [...] Read more.
The focus of this study was to compare the yolk flavor of eggs from laying hens of Chinese indigenous and commercial, based on detection of volatile compounds, fatty acids, and texture characteristics determination, using sensory evaluation, artificial sensors (electronic nose (E-nose), electronic tongue (E-tongue)), and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). A total of 405 laying hens (Hy-Line Brown (n = 135), Xueyu White (n = 135), and Xinyang Blue (n = 135)) were used for the study, and 540 eggs (180 per breed) were collected within 48 h of being laid and used for sensory evaluation and the instrument detection of yolk flavor. Our research findings demonstrated significant breed differences for sensory attributes of egg yolk, based on sensory evaluation and instrument detection. The milky flavor, moisture, and compactness scores (p < 0.05) of egg yolk from Xueyu White and Xinyang Blue were significantly higher than that of Hy-Line Brown. The aroma preference scores of Xinyang Blue (p < 0.05) were significantly higher, compared to Hy-Line Brown and Xueyu White. The sensor responses of WIW and W2W from E-nose and STS from E-tongue analysis were significantly higher foe egg yolks of Hy-Line Brown (p < 0.05), compared to that of Xueyu White and Xinyang Blue. Additionally, the sensor responses of umami from E-tongue analysis, was significantly higher for egg yolks of Xueyu White (p < 0.05), compared to that of Hy-Line Brown and Xinyang Blue. Besides, the contents of alcohol and fatty acids, such as palmitic acid, oleic acid, and arachidonic acid, in egg yolk were positively correlated with egg flavor. The texture analyzer showed that springiness, gumminess, and hardness of Hy-Line Brown and Xueyu White (p < 0.05) were significantly higher, compared to Xinyang Blue. The above findings demonstrate that the egg yolk from Chinese indigenous strain had better milky flavor, moisture, and compactness, as well as better texture. The egg yolk flavors were mainly due to presence of alcohol and fatty acids, such as palmitic acid, oleic acid, and arachidonic acid, which would provide research direction on improvement in egg yolk flavor by nutrition. The current findings validate the strong correlation between the results of egg yolk flavor and texture, based on sensory evaluation, artificial sensors, and GC-MS. All these indicators would be beneficial for increased preference for egg yolk flavor by consumers and utilization by food processing industry, as well as a basis for the discrimination of eggs from different breeds of laying hens. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1849 KiB  
Article
Development of Flavor and Taste Components of Sous-Vide-Cooked Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) Fillet as Affected by Various Conditions
by Jaksuma Pongsetkul, Jirawat Yongsawatdigul, Surintorn Boonanuntanasarn and Soottawat Benjakul
Foods 2022, 11(22), 3681; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11223681 - 17 Nov 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2018
Abstract
This study aims to shed light on the association between non-volatile and volatile compounds related to flavor/taste characteristics as well as sensory acceptability of Nile tilapia fillet (Oreochromis niloticus) cooked by various sous-vide (SV) conditions (50–60 ℃, 30–60 min), with fish [...] Read more.
This study aims to shed light on the association between non-volatile and volatile compounds related to flavor/taste characteristics as well as sensory acceptability of Nile tilapia fillet (Oreochromis niloticus) cooked by various sous-vide (SV) conditions (50–60 ℃, 30–60 min), with fish cooked with boiling water used as control. Higher temperatures and longer processing times of SV cooking led to greater protein and lipid oxidation as indicated by the increase in total sulfhydryl (-SH), carbonyl, free fatty acid (FFA) contents as well as peroxide values (PV) and thiobarbituric acid reactive substance (TBARS) values. The differences in flavor/taste components including adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-related compounds, free amino acids (FAAs) and volatiles were also obtained, which directly affect sensory acceptability as evaluated by using the hedonic scale. Based on principal component analysis (PCA) results, the acceptability score was strongly correlated with inosine monophosphate (IMP) and acetoin, which seem to be the most crucial flavor enhancers for cooked tilapia. Among all samples, tilapia processed at 60 °C for 45 and 60 min, which contained significantly higher IMP and acetoin (p < 0.05) than others, had significantly higher flavor-liking and overall-liking scores, with a more than 7.5 meaning for high acceptability (p < 0.05), indicating the optimal SV conditions for tilapia fillet. Overall, the present finding indicated that the SV-cooking technique, at the optimal conditions, can improve the meat quality of cooked fish, in terms of flavor/taste characteristics, compared with traditional cooking (control). Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

16 pages, 3207 KiB  
Article
Contribution of Lipids to the Flavor of Mussel (Mytilus edulis) Maillard Reaction Products
by Ran Xin, Lixin Ma, Rong Liu, Xuhui Huang, Baoshang Fu, Xiuping Dong and Lei Qin
Foods 2022, 11(19), 3015; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11193015 - 28 Sep 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2081
Abstract
Lipid oxidation and the Maillard reaction are two of the most important reactions affecting the flavor of foods that have been heat-processed. To investigate the contribution of lipids to the mussel’s flavor, the mussel’s Maillard reaction products (MRPs) were prepared with polar lipids [...] Read more.
Lipid oxidation and the Maillard reaction are two of the most important reactions affecting the flavor of foods that have been heat-processed. To investigate the contribution of lipids to the mussel’s flavor, the mussel’s Maillard reaction products (MRPs) were prepared with polar lipids (mainly phospholipids) and nonpolar lipids (mainly glycerides), respectively. The effects of polar and nonpolar lipids on the flavor of the MRPs were investigated by sensory evaluation, electronic tongue, electronic nose, ultra-performance liquid chromatography-mass-spectrometry (UPLC-MS) and gas chromatography-mass-spectrometry (GC-MS). From the sensory evaluation results, the polar lipid MRPs had the highest scores. The tastes of polar lipid MRPs and nonpolar lipid MRPs were mainly umami, saltiness and sourness, and there were significant differences in their sour tastes. The flavor compounds in the MRPs were mainly inorganic sulfides, organic sulfides and nitrogen oxides. The odor of polar lipid MRPs was stronger than that of nonpolar lipid MRPs, and the seafood flavor was more obvious. A total of 37 volatile compounds were detected by GC-MS, mainly aldehydes, alcohols and ketones. The addition of polar lipids helped the MRPs to produce more volatile compounds. A total of 177 non-volatile compounds (including amino acids and their derivatives and oligopeptides, etc.) were detected in the samples using UPLC-MS. The non-volatile compounds contained in the no-lipid MRPs, polar lipid MRPs and nonpolar lipid MRPs were significantly different. This study provides a theoretical basis and technical support for the production of mussel MRPs. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop