Generative AI Alignment with Learning Environments in Higher Education

A special issue of Education Sciences (ISSN 2227-7102). This special issue belongs to the section "Higher Education".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 15 June 2026 | Viewed by 2545

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Transnational Education, King’s Academy, King’s College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK
Interests: digital education; teacher training; teacher identity; language education; education policy; digital equity and inclusion; higher education; teacher educator competencies; higher education in Africa; learning design

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Centre for Higher Education Research and Scholarship (CHERS), Imperial College London, Bath BA2 7AY, UK
Interests: technology-enhanced learning; generative AI; professional development; education leadership; systematic reviews

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Faculty of Education, Port Said University, Port Said City 42517, Egypt
Interests: computer-assisted language learning (CALL); AI applications in language education; technology-enhanced second-language writing and feedback

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The rapid evolution of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is redefining how knowledge is created, communicated, and applied in higher education. GenAI represents not only a technical advancement but also a pedagogical and cultural turning point, with the potential to transform learning, foster inclusivity, and drive innovation in teaching and professional development.

This Special Issue examines how GenAI aligns with, transforms, and reimagines learning environments across global higher education contexts. It invites critical and empirical contributions that explore how educators and students engage with GenAI to enhance creativity, reflection, and collaboration, while acknowledging the ethical, social, and cultural dimensions of its use.

By addressing opportunities and challenges—such as equity, bias, and digital literacy—this Special Issue aims to strengthen understanding of how GenAI can contribute to sustainable, culturally responsive educational ecosystems. It emphasises the importance of human–AI collaboration in supporting diverse learning identities and pedagogical innovation grounded in fairness, transparency, and accessibility.

This Special Issue addresses gaps in the literature by calling for evidence on how GenAI is used in real classrooms, how it affects diverse learners, and how institutions can adopt GenAI in equitable and sustainable ways.

Submissions may include empirical studies, theoretical or conceptual papers, methodological contributions, case studies, and reflective practice reports.

Proposed Themes

  • Pedagogical Alignment and Teaching Innovation;
  • Student Agency, Identity, and Learning with AI;
  • Ethics, Fairness, and Responsible Use;
  • Culturally Responsive and Inclusive AI Practices.

Dr. Felix Kwihangana
Dr. Nashwa Ismail
Dr. Yara Abdelaty
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Education Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • higher education
  • pedagogical innovation
  • culturally responsive teaching
  • learning environments
  • ethical AI in education
  • student agency and identity
  • human–AI collaboration
  • educational transformation

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

24 pages, 628 KB  
Article
Aligning Generative AI with Higher Education Workflows: Indonesian Lecturers’ Anxiety–Satisfaction Profiles and Adoption Patterns
by Muhammad Zaim, Safnil Arsyad, Budi Waluyo, An Fauzia Rozani Syafei, Ratmanida and Rifqi Aulia Zaim
Educ. Sci. 2026, 16(2), 271; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16020271 - 9 Feb 2026
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1218
Abstract
Generative AI (GenAI) is increasingly embedded in higher education workflows for teaching preparation and academic work, yet lecturers’ affective readiness and perceived alignment between AI use and professional values remain underexplored. This mixed-methods study investigated 191 Indonesian university English lecturers’ GenAI-related anxiety and [...] Read more.
Generative AI (GenAI) is increasingly embedded in higher education workflows for teaching preparation and academic work, yet lecturers’ affective readiness and perceived alignment between AI use and professional values remain underexplored. This mixed-methods study investigated 191 Indonesian university English lecturers’ GenAI-related anxiety and satisfaction, mapped adoption patterns through profile analysis, and identified key integration challenges. Quantitative data were collected using a reliable 10-item AI Anxiety Scale (α = 0.89) and a global satisfaction item and analyzed using descriptive statistics, Spearman’s correlations, and K-means clustering. The strongest anxieties concerned over-reliance (M = 4.20, SD = 0.80, d = −1.12) and content accuracy (M = 3.70, SD = 1.10, d = −0.76). Anxiety was negatively associated with satisfaction, most notably for perceived complexity (r = −0.197, p = 0.006) and dependency concerns (r = −0.184, p = 0.012). Three profiles emerged: high-anxiety lecturers reported distrust and pedagogical discomfort; moderate-anxiety lecturers adopted GenAI conditionally with verification; and low-anxiety lecturers used GenAI confidently and proactively. Qualitative reflections and interviews revealed five dominant use cases, involving writing support, material development, assessment design, translation, and lesson planning, while stressing persistent barriers related to ethical uncertainty, mistrust in AI-generated outputs, and concerns about diminished educator agency. The findings suggest that aligning GenAI with higher education workflows requires human-centered support, including context-sensitive AI literacy, clear ethical guidance, and institutional governance that strengthens responsible adoption. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop