Training Special Education Teachers and Staff to Use Evidence-Based Practices

A special issue of Education Sciences (ISSN 2227-7102). This special issue belongs to the section "Teacher Education".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 20 November 2025 | Viewed by 4421

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Educational Studies, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
Interests: literacy; special education; inclusion; mild to moderate disabilities; response to intervention; teacher education

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Most educators are aware that preparing special education teachers to implement evidence-based practices is critical for increasing the successful outcomes and independence of their students with disabilities. Special education teachers require effective professional development training and support as they develop their skills with implementing interventions demonstrated by rigorous research to improve student outcomes. The Council for Exceptional Children (CEC) provides a set of standards for determining the extent to which research provides evidence of effectiveness based on several experimental high-quality research studies that demonstrate strong effects. Examples of evidence-based practices identified by the CEC standards include explicit instruction, positive behavior interventions and supports, universal design for learning and assistive technology.

To increase the likelihood of student success with evidence-based interventions, teachers must implement the instructional procedures with fidelity. Research demonstrates a strong connection between intervention fidelity and student outcomes (e.g., Knight, 2019). A widely used approach for attempting to bring evidence-based practices into classrooms is staff development in the form of brief lectures or workshops. These types of learning opportunities for teachers usually have no follow-up or classroom support and produce less than optimal results. Teacher training research has identified several approaches to helping teachers become skilled with delivering evidence-based interventions. Effective approaches to training teachers to implement interventions with fidelity include behavior skills training, coaching, video analysis, performance feedback and multicomponent interventions (Brownell et al., 2019).

The purpose of this Special Issue is to contribute to and extend the research base on training special education teachers to implement evidence-based practices.

For this Special Issue, original research articles and literature reviews are welcome. Research areas may include (but not limited to) the following: 

  • Training special education teachers, intervention specialists, or paraeducators to use a specific evidence-based practice for teaching academic skills, social skills, vocational skills or functional/daily living skills;
  • Training special education teachers, intervention specialists, or paraeducators to use behavior management or classroom management interventions.  

I look forward to receiving your contributions. 

Prof. Dr. Sheila Alber-Morgan
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Education Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • teacher training
  • evidence-based practices
  • treatment fidelity
  • coaching
  • behavior skill training

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (5 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

18 pages, 773 KiB  
Article
Developing Inclusive Educators: Analyzing the Effectiveness of a Short-Term Technical Assistance Model for Best Practices
by Joseph A. Hogan, Cristin Montalbano, James Coviello, Jessica McQueston, Moira Kirby, Bon June Koo, Jenelle Nissley-Tsiopinis, Sara Jutcovich and Julie Lang
Educ. Sci. 2025, 15(5), 578; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15050578 - 7 May 2025
Viewed by 185
Abstract
This study examined the effectiveness of professional development for inclusive education and best practices through a short-term technical assistance (TA) model across 15 schools. The professional development was structured to enhance school professionals’ knowledge about inclusion as a concept, as well as best [...] Read more.
This study examined the effectiveness of professional development for inclusive education and best practices through a short-term technical assistance (TA) model across 15 schools. The professional development was structured to enhance school professionals’ knowledge about inclusion as a concept, as well as best practices in inclusive education. Topics included the use of accommodations and modifications, differentiation and Universal Design for Learning (UDL), building an inclusive school culture, and co-teaching. Pre- and post-test measures were utilized to measure participants’ growth in the knowledge of these topics. Descriptive statistics and dependent t-tests were utilized to analyze data across all topic areas. The findings indicate that short-term TA models of professional development prove beneficial for improving attitudes and beliefs in inclusive education for content knowledge and building an inclusive school culture. Short-term TA did not yield statistically significant increases for classroom strategies or implementation, suggesting that more intensive professional development models need to be incorporated as a wider professional development plan for using best practices in inclusive education by school professionals. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1081 KiB  
Article
Teachers Training Paraeducators to Implement Systematic Prompting Practices for Students with Significant Disabilities
by Matthew E. Brock, Mary A. Barczak, Kara N. Shawbitz and Genevieve Hurlburt
Educ. Sci. 2025, 15(4), 460; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15040460 - 8 Apr 2025
Viewed by 329
Abstract
Teachers are often tasked with training paraeducators to deliver instruction to students with significant disabilities, but there is little research that involves teachers training paraeducators. In this single-case design study, we supported teachers to deliver tiered training that first involved group training for [...] Read more.
Teachers are often tasked with training paraeducators to deliver instruction to students with significant disabilities, but there is little research that involves teachers training paraeducators. In this single-case design study, we supported teachers to deliver tiered training that first involved group training for teams of paraeducators, and then follow-up coaching for the subset who did not meet criterion-level implementation fidelity. Three teachers at three different schools delivered tiered training on systematic prompting to nine paraeducators who taught students with significant disabilities. After tiered training, all nine implemented simultaneous prompting in both targeted (d = 0.73) and generalization situations (d = 0.76), as well as least-to-most prompting in both targeted (d = 0.65) and generalization situations (d = 0.37). Five met criterion-level adherence with group training alone, and four required coaching. Eight of the nine paraeducators also improved their implementation quality. Students made progress on individualized goals aligned with paraeducator-delivered instruction both in targeted (d = 0.99) and generalization situations (d = 0.14). These findings suggest that teachers can effectively implement tiered training that enables paraeducators to deliver evidence-based instruction to students with significant disabilities. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 1343 KiB  
Article
The Impact of Multilevel Coaching on Pre-Service Teachers’ Fidelity of Implementation of an Evidence-Based Reading Intervention
by Corinne R. Kingsbery, Kristen D. Beach, Samantha A. Gesel, Charles L. Wood, Erin K. Washburn and Thomas Connors
Educ. Sci. 2025, 15(2), 244; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020244 - 15 Feb 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 738
Abstract
Teacher preparation programs (TPPs) can equip pre-service teachers (PSTs) with skills to implement evidence-based reading interventions with fidelity by engaging PSTs in carefully designed clinical experiences with feedback via coaching. To individualize support and facilitate a responsive approach to feedback centered on PSTs’ [...] Read more.
Teacher preparation programs (TPPs) can equip pre-service teachers (PSTs) with skills to implement evidence-based reading interventions with fidelity by engaging PSTs in carefully designed clinical experiences with feedback via coaching. To individualize support and facilitate a responsive approach to feedback centered on PSTs’ levels of fidelity, first, this study examined the impact of a multilevel coaching intervention on PSTs’ fidelity of implementation of an evidence-based reading intervention during a tutoring clinical experience. Second, this study examined PSTs’ perceptions of the feasibility, effectiveness, and future impact of the multilevel coaching intervention. Results of a single-case, multiple baseline across participants design indicated a functional relation between the multilevel coaching intervention and PSTs’ fidelity, inclusive of both structural and process dimensions. Furthermore, PSTs found the multilevel coaching intervention to be socially valid, indicating the intervention was feasible, effective, and impactful on their future teaching experiences. Major implications for teacher preparation and coaching support include (a) providing PSTs with authentic clinical experiences, inclusive of coaching support, when implementing EBPs; (b) viewing fidelity as a multidimensional construct that can inform coaching support and teacher practices; and (c) enhancing TPPs with experiences that impact PSTs’ perceptions about their own ability to teach reading. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 769 KiB  
Article
Using Behavioral Skills Training and Coaching with Preservice Teachers: An Evaluation of Impact on Implementation Fidelity
by Mary Rachel Sawyer
Educ. Sci. 2025, 15(2), 228; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020228 - 13 Feb 2025
Viewed by 899
Abstract
The need for effective and efficient special education teacher training in evidence-based instructional procedures persists. In this study, behavioral skills training (BST) and coaching were used to train and support a preservice special education teacher to implement empirically supported procedures (ESPs) in the [...] Read more.
The need for effective and efficient special education teacher training in evidence-based instructional procedures persists. In this study, behavioral skills training (BST) and coaching were used to train and support a preservice special education teacher to implement empirically supported procedures (ESPs) in the classroom. A multiple baseline across skills design was used to evaluate effects across experimental conditions. The participant identified perceived issues needing intervention; the experimenter selected ESPs with contextual fit for implementation. Intervention was phased as needed in three conditions: task analysis, BST, and coaching. Results demonstrated that task analysis alone was not effective in producing sufficient implementation fidelity, but the addition of BST brought implementation fidelity rates of 88% or higher. Coaching effectively achieved implementation rates of 90% or higher for all ESPs. Furthermore, the participant reported high levels of satisfaction with the ESPs and the training and coaching procedures used to train her to implement them. Implications, limitations, and directions for future research are discussed. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 439 KiB  
Article
Training Staff to Implement Free-Operant Preference Assessment: Effects of Remote Behavioral Skills Training
by Tangchen Li and Sheila R. Alber-Morgan
Educ. Sci. 2024, 14(10), 1082; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14101082 - 4 Oct 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1445
Abstract
Behavior Skills Training (BST) was used remotely to teach four special education teachers who lived in China to conduct free-operant preference assessments. A multiple baseline across participant design demonstrated a functional relationship between remote BST and the percentage of assessment steps completed correctly. [...] Read more.
Behavior Skills Training (BST) was used remotely to teach four special education teachers who lived in China to conduct free-operant preference assessments. A multiple baseline across participant design demonstrated a functional relationship between remote BST and the percentage of assessment steps completed correctly. Additionally, two of the four participants demonstrated generalization. Limitations and future research directions are discussed. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop