Feature Papers in Diabetology 2025

A special issue of Diabetology (ISSN 2673-4540).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 July 2025 | Viewed by 830

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. Division of Health Sciences, School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia
2. Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity (ARENA), Adelaide, SA, Australia
Interests: obesity; lipids; diabetes; heart disease
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

As Editor-in-Chief of the journal Diabetology, I am pleased to announce that the call for submissions for a Special Issue entitled “Feature Papers in Diabetology 2025” is now online. Diabetology (ISSN 2673-4540) is an international, peer-reviewed, scientific open access journal that provides an advanced forum for studies related to epidemiology, etiology, pathophysiology, pathogenesis, management, complications, and the prevention of diabetes, including the molecular, biochemical, and physiological aspects of diabetes. In this “Feature Papers” Special Issue, we aim to publish outstanding contributions in the key fields covered by the journal, which will represent a significant contribution to the community. The complete Special Issue will be published in book format after 10 papers have been published.

We welcome high-quality papers falling within the scope of the journal. Submitted papers will first be evaluated by the Editors. Please note that all papers will be subjected to thorough and rigorous peer review.

Prof. Dr. Peter Clifton
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Diabetology is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • diabetes
  • complications
  • obesity

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

16 pages, 714 KiB  
Article
Changes to Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) Testing and Associations with the GDM Prevalence and Large- and Small-for-Gestational-Age Infants—An Observational Study in an Australian Jurisdiction, 2012–2019
by Jennifer Hutchinson, Catherine R. Knight-Agarwal, Christopher J. Nolan and Deborah Davis
Diabetology 2025, 6(6), 54; https://doi.org/10.3390/diabetology6060054 - 9 Jun 2025
Viewed by 78
Abstract
Background: Two changes to gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) testing were implemented in the Australian Capital Territory in 2015 and 2017. Aims: We aimed to determine the associations between testing regimes and the prevalence of GDM and large-for-gestational-age (LGA) and small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants and [...] Read more.
Background: Two changes to gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) testing were implemented in the Australian Capital Territory in 2015 and 2017. Aims: We aimed to determine the associations between testing regimes and the prevalence of GDM and large-for-gestational-age (LGA) and small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants and to compare the prevalence of LGA and SGA infants between women with and without GDM in each testing period. Methods: A total of 23,790 singleton live births with estimated GDM testing and birth dates between June 2012 and December 2019 were stratified into groups: pre-testing changes (June 2012–December 2014, group 1, n = 8069), revised diagnostic criteria (January 2015–May 2017, group 2, n = 8035) and changed pathology centrifugation protocol (June 2017-December 2019, group 3, n = 7686). Women were allocated to groups based on their estimated GDM testing date and stratified by their GDM status. A chi-square test, pairwise z-tests and logistic regression tested the associations. Results: The GDM prevalence significantly increased from 9.5% (group 1) to 19.4% (group 2) to 26.3% (group 3) (all: p < 0.001). The LGA infant prevalence significantly decreased in non-GDM women following revised diagnostic criteria implementation (11.6% vs. 9.7%, p = 0.001). Compared to group 1, women with GDM in groups 2 and 3 had significantly reduced odds of having LGA infants (aOR = 0.73, 95% CI of 0.56–0.95 and p = 0.021 and aOR = 0.75, 95% CI of 0.59–0.97 and p = 0.029, respectively). Compared to group 1, non-GDM women in groups 2 and 3 had significantly reduced odds of having LGA infants (aOR = 0.83, 95% CI of 0.74–0.92 and p < 0.001 and aOR = 0.88, 95% CI of 0.79–0.99 and p = 0.026, respectively). There were no significant associations for group 3 compared to group 2 nor for SGA infants. Conclusions: While significantly increasing the GDM prevalence, implementing the testing changes was associated with a reduced whole-population LGA infant prevalence without a change in the SGA infant prevalence. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in Diabetology 2025)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 630 KiB  
Article
Does Fetal Size Affect Umbilical Artery Pulsatility Index in Pregnancies Complicated by Gestational Diabetes?
by Libera Troìa, Alessandro Libretti, Stefania Ferrari, Anna Dotta, Sonia Giacomini, Erika Mainolfi, Federica Spissu, Alessia Tivano, Daniela Surico and Valentino Remorgida
Diabetology 2025, 6(4), 27; https://doi.org/10.3390/diabetology6040027 - 7 Apr 2025
Viewed by 348
Abstract
Objectives: Excessive fetal growth is the most common fetal complication associated with gestational diabetes (GDM), resulting in adverse short- and long-term outcomes. Our main objective was to evaluate the influence of excessive fetal growth on Doppler ultrasonographic measurements of the Umbilical Artery (UA) [...] Read more.
Objectives: Excessive fetal growth is the most common fetal complication associated with gestational diabetes (GDM), resulting in adverse short- and long-term outcomes. Our main objective was to evaluate the influence of excessive fetal growth on Doppler ultrasonographic measurements of the Umbilical Artery (UA) among women with GDM during the third trimester of pregnancy. Methods: A retrospective study among 472 women with GDM was conducted. UA-PI was measured by Doppler ultrasonography three different times during the third trimester of pregnancy at 28, 32, and 36 weeks. Pregnancies were grouped according to the fetal weight centile or birthweight in two groups: large for gestational age (LGA) group (>90th percentile or ≥4000 g at birth) and adequate for gestational age (AGA) group (<90th percentile or <4000 g at birth, not including the intrauterine growth restrictions). Results: In the LGA group (n = 57, 12.1%), women had higher BMI (p = 0.0001) and fasting blood glucose than the AGA group (97.08 ± 40.69 vs. 86.29 ± 39.58 mg/dL; p = 0.0550). They required insulin therapy more frequently to achieve glycemic control (63.2% vs. 34%, p = 0.0001). In LGA, UA-PI decreased progressively from 28 to 36 weeks (p = 0.0048). The most pronounced reduction occurred at 32 weeks (p = 0.0076). Conclusions: All fetuses from mothers with GDM had a significant and progressive decline in UA-PI during the third trimester of pregnancy. LGA fetuses showed lower UA-PI values compared with AGA fetuses. Since maternal hyperglycemia increases the risk of fetal overweight and GDM may represent a fetal vascular disorder, it therefore seems possible that in LGA fetuses, maternal hyperglycemia could influence the fetal vasculature. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in Diabetology 2025)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop