Quality of Life in Surgical Oncology Patients

A Special Issue of Current Oncology (ISSN 1718-7729) belonging to the section "Surgical Oncology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 October 2026 | Viewed by 2750

Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia
Interests: upper GI surgery; pancreatic cancer; liver cancer; gastric cancer; value-based care

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The treatment of patients with cancer is complex and multidisciplinary. We have always assumed that the role of all treatments is to cure the disease and return the patient to a normal lifestyle. In modern medical practice, this involves assessing not only survival and cures but balancing the impacts of these treatments, which often may be palliative or non-curative, on the overall quality of life of the patient and the wider ramifications on their family and carers. 

As the burden of cancer often falls on the older population, and as this population increases with life expectancy rates increasing worldwide, this Special Issue becomes even more important as we assess the impacts of aggressive treatments on a frailer population where issues, such as personal mobility, desires for independent living, and morbidity, associated with treatments need to be considered and assessed. To paraphrase Ivor Lewis when discussing some early treatments of oesophageal cancer: "We may or may not have prolonged their life: we certainly prolonged their misery”

As our abilities to treat and palliate tumours expand, we also need to expand beyond simple measures of just survival but take a more nuanced view and include in studies the overall impact of treatments on patients and their families, the ramifications on health resources and the health and community economic repercussions of treatments.

This Special Issue aims to present and discuss the issues of quality of life and surgical oncology. Contributions to be considered should cover this in the broader context of impacts not just on the patient but on the community and society.

Topics of interest will include, but not be limited to, the following:

  • Quality of life during and following treatment;
  • Impacts of treatments on the older population;
  • Impacts of technological improvements on treatments and quality of life;
  • Balancing cure and palliation with quality of life in different aged populations;
  • Moral dilemma associated with refusing and refusal of treatments in the older age groups;
  • Impacts of aggressive treatments on the health system in a financially constrained environment and the real opportunity costs to other patient cohorts;
  • Health equity and quality of life in the provision of treatments.

Dr. Neil Merrett
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-anonymized peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Current Oncology is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • PROMS
  • quality of life
  • health economics
  • surgical oncology
  • precision medicine
  • robotic surgery

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

11 pages, 686 KB  
Article
Association Between Thoracic Inlet Size and Cervical Anastomosis Outcomes in Esophageal Cancer Surgery
by Iskan Calli, Ibrahim Dogan, Halil Alper Bozkurt, Mehmet Kadir Bartin, Ezgi Sonmez and Sebahattin Celik
Curr. Oncol. 2026, 33(6), 353; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol33060353 - 11 Jun 2026
Viewed by 491
Abstract
Esophageal cancer surgery is associated with high morbidity and mortality, and anastomotic leakage remains a critical determinant of outcomes. Although thoracic inlet size has been linked to complications in retrosternal reconstruction, its role in posterior mediastinal reconstruction is unclear. In this retrospective study, [...] Read more.
Esophageal cancer surgery is associated with high morbidity and mortality, and anastomotic leakage remains a critical determinant of outcomes. Although thoracic inlet size has been linked to complications in retrosternal reconstruction, its role in posterior mediastinal reconstruction is unclear. In this retrospective study, 67 patients who underwent esophagectomy with posterior mediastinal reconstruction were analyzed. Thoracic inlet measurements were obtained from preoperative computed tomography. Postoperative complications occurred in 29.9% of patients, anastomotic leakage (AL) in 14.9%, and overall 30-day postoperative mortality in 13.4%. The thoracic inlet area (TIA) was significantly lower in non-survivors than in survivors (513.5 vs. 703.3 mm2, p = 0.012). Anastomotic leakage was markedly more frequent among non-survivors (66.7% vs. 6.9%). In multivariable analysis adjusted for age and sex, thoracic inlet area remained associated with postoperative mortality; however, the findings should be interpreted cautiously because of the limited sample size and retrospective design. These findings suggest a possible association between thoracic inlet geometry and postoperative outcomes in posterior mediastinal reconstruction; however, larger prospective multicenter studies are required before definitive clinical conclusions can be drawn. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Quality of Life in Surgical Oncology Patients)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

13 pages, 719 KB  
Article
Perspectives of Rectal Cancer Patients Undergoing Non-Operative Management (NOM): A Qualitative Study
by Armaghan Alam, Ameer Farooq, Farhad Udwadia, Manoj Raval, Ahmer Karimuddin, Terry Phang, Amandeep Ghuman and Carl Brown
Curr. Oncol. 2026, 33(6), 348; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol33060348 - 9 Jun 2026
Viewed by 655
Abstract
There is growing interest in non-operative management (NOM) for rectal cancer patients who achieve a complete response to neoadjuvant therapy. The patients’ perspectives of these approaches are limited. Here, we describe a qualitative study where we conducted semi-structured interviews with fourteen rectal cancer [...] Read more.
There is growing interest in non-operative management (NOM) for rectal cancer patients who achieve a complete response to neoadjuvant therapy. The patients’ perspectives of these approaches are limited. Here, we describe a qualitative study where we conducted semi-structured interviews with fourteen rectal cancer patients, including seven men and seven women, who were successfully treated by NOM at our center between 2020 and 2022. The responses were analyzed using the constant comparative method. Four major thematic categories emerged: impact of rectal cancer diagnosis, treatment values, decision-making factors, and the impact of NOM surveillance. Avoidance of a stoma was a major theme in both determining patient treatment values as well as ultimately driving their decision-making. Trust in the treating physician was also found to be a major theme in decision-making. While the psychological burden of surveillance did emerge as a major theme, patients who did not have recurrence were still quite satisfied with their decision to pursue NOM. Limitations of this study include selection bias, the single-center design, and the lack of patients who ultimately experienced recurrence following NOM. As NOM of rectal cancer becomes more commonplace, understanding the patients’ perspectives will ensure appropriate counseling and shared decision-making. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Quality of Life in Surgical Oncology Patients)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

12 pages, 840 KB  
Article
Axillary Reverse Mapping Improves Quality of Life by Significantly Reducing Clinically Relevant Lymphedema After Axillary Lymph Node Dissection in Older Women with Breast Cancer
by Merve Tokocin, Turan Pehlivan and Atilla Celik
Curr. Oncol. 2026, 33(4), 212; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol33040212 - 10 Apr 2026
Viewed by 1127
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is one of the most debilitating long-term morbidities after axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), severely impairing quality of life through reduced mobility, independence, and chronic burden, especially in older women. Axillary reverse mapping (ARM) aims to preserve upper [...] Read more.
Background: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is one of the most debilitating long-term morbidities after axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), severely impairing quality of life through reduced mobility, independence, and chronic burden, especially in older women. Axillary reverse mapping (ARM) aims to preserve upper extremity lymphatics while maintaining oncologic safety. Evidence in older adult populations with long-term follow-up remains limited. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 138 female patients (median age 72.5 years) undergoing ALND for invasive breast cancer between January 2018 and January 2024. Patients were divided into ARM (n = 72) and non-ARM (n = 66) groups. BCRL was graded 0–3 according to adapted International Society of Lymphology (ISL) criteria (2013 consensus document). Assessments were performed preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months using blinded circumference measurements and bioimpedance spectroscopy. Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable. Mean follow-up was 46.5 ± 8.8 months. Clinically relevant BCRL (Grades 2–3) was dramatically lower in the ARM group (18.1% vs. 60.6%, p < 0.0001), while subclinical changes (Grade 1) were similar (31.9% vs. 27.3%, p = 0.55). Kaplan–Meier analysis showed significantly better clinically relevant lymphedema-free survival with ARM (log-rank p = 0.00019), with curve separation after 30–40 months—indicating a sustained long-term benefit for quality of life in this frail population. Recurrence rates were comparable (8.3% vs. 10.6%, p = 0.776). Multivariable Cox regression confirmed ARM as an independent protective factor (adjusted HR 0.22, 95% CI 0.11–0.44, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: In older women with breast cancer, ARM significantly reduces clinically relevant lymphedema—a major determinant of long-term quality of life—without compromising oncologic safety. These findings support the routine consideration of ARM during ALND to preserve upper-extremity function, mobility, and independence in this vulnerable population, thereby balancing aggressive oncologic treatment with enhanced long-term quality of life and reduced treatment-related morbidity. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Quality of Life in Surgical Oncology Patients)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop