Community Resilience and Urban Sustainability: A Global Perspective

A special issue of Buildings (ISSN 2075-5309). This special issue belongs to the section "Architectural Design, Urban Science, and Real Estate".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 November 2026 | Viewed by 11476

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Architecture, Design and Planning, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia
Interests: Chinese urban form and planning; architectural history; architecture and urbanism in developing countries; sustainable neighbourhood design
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Architecture, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China
Interests: sustainable cities and communities; sustainable buildings; green infrastructure; urban and housing studies

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Over the past few decades, communities worldwide have faced diverse challenges, including natural disasters, climate change, ecological and health crises, and social inequalities. The concept of community resilience—the ability of a community to prepare for, respond to, and recover from adverse events—has gained increasing importance. Meanwhile, the pursuit of urban sustainability has become a central goal, focusing on enhancing energy efficiency, minimizing environmental impact, and ensuring the long-term viability of cities. However, despite their shared relevance, community resilience and urban sustainability have often been treated as separate agendas in both research and practice. This disconnection has resulted in uncoordinated efforts, inadequate disaster preparedness, and heightened climate vulnerability. Without broad community involvement and understanding, sustainability initiatives often struggle to gain traction. These challenges are especially pronounced in the Global South, where urbanization unfolds under different conditions than in the Global North. On the one hand, rapid population growth, informal settlements, insufficient infrastructure, and environmental vulnerability present urgent pressures. On the other hand, cities in the Global South possess distinct and often underestimated capacities for innovation, adaptation, and grassroots problem-solving. A global perspective that values knowledge and experiences in diverse contexts is therefore essential for recognizing existing problems and strengths, as well as creating more inclusive, responsive, and effective strategies for both resilience and sustainability.

This Special Issue of Buildings seeks papers addressing theoretical frameworks, empirical studies, case analyses, and innovative practices from the frontiers of transformative practices across the world that can inform global strategies for sustainable and resilient urban futures. Submissions may address, but are not limited to, the following topics:

  • Frameworks and theories exploring the conceptual linkages between community resilience and urban sustainability;
  • Empirical studies of challenges in and approaches to the involvement of local communities in developing environmental awareness, implementing sustainable solutions and retrofitting existing infrastructure;
  • Case analyses of urban planning policies for incorporating community resilience into urban governance and the (re)development of green infrastructure;
  • Contextually relevant solutions that reduce dependence on external resources and minimize vulnerability through the integration of resilience into sustainable practices.

Prospective authors are encouraged to submit papers by 30 September 2025. All full papers will go through the standard review process to determine their suitability for publication. For further queries, please contact the Guest Editors (Prof. Duanfang Lu <duanfang.lu@sydney.edu.au>; Assoc. Prof. Chunyan Yang <chunyan.yang@swjtu.edu.cn>) by including “CRUS” in the email subject line.

Prof. Dr. Duanfang Lu
Dr. Chunyan Yang
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Buildings is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • community resilience
  • building sustainability
  • climate change
  • urban governance
  • green Infrastructure
  • sustainable design

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (5 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

20 pages, 505 KB  
Article
Urban–Rural Asymmetries in Social Resilience: The Role of Territorialized Institutional Trust in Central and Eastern Europe
by Cristian Pîrvulescu
Buildings 2026, 16(8), 1553; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16081553 - 15 Apr 2026
Viewed by 374
Abstract
Social resilience has become a central concept in urban and sustainability research, yet its institutional and spatial determinants remain insufficiently specified in contexts marked by persistent urban–rural asymmetries. The objective of this article is to explain how spatial differences in institutional trust shape [...] Read more.
Social resilience has become a central concept in urban and sustainability research, yet its institutional and spatial determinants remain insufficiently specified in contexts marked by persistent urban–rural asymmetries. The objective of this article is to explain how spatial differences in institutional trust shape divergent resilience trajectories across territories in Central and Eastern Europe. This study develops a conceptual, mechanism-based framework and employs a qualitative comparative illustration based on institutional indicators of trust, service accessibility, and governance effectiveness. The analysis shows that territorialized institutional trust—structured by institutional presence, procedural consistency, and institutional legibility—systematically conditions access to resources, stabilizes expectations, and shapes adaptive behavior, with dense and predictable institutional environments supporting longer-term resilience while thin and uneven ones entrench short-term coping. The findings suggest that social resilience should be understood as an institutional outcome shaped by the spatial organization of governance rather than as a territorially neutral attribute of communities. The broader significance of the study lies in providing a territorially sensitive and institutionally grounded framework for urban sustainability and resilience planning, highlighting how built environment and governance arrangements jointly structure the adaptive capacities of urban and rural territories. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Community Resilience and Urban Sustainability: A Global Perspective)
Show Figures

Figure 1

32 pages, 8627 KB  
Article
A Social Dimension Study of Post-Occupancy Evaluation for Old Residential Communities: A Case Study of Baoshengli North Community in Beijing
by Jianming Yang, Yanglu Shi, Wenying Ding, Yang Liu, Mingli Wang, Chenxiao Liu and Mo Han
Buildings 2026, 16(6), 1263; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16061263 - 23 Mar 2026
Viewed by 422
Abstract
Against the background of high-quality development and urban renewal in China, old residential communities have become key areas for improving spatial quality and quality of life. We used the entrance pavilion of Baoshengli North Community as a case study to explore how spatial [...] Read more.
Against the background of high-quality development and urban renewal in China, old residential communities have become key areas for improving spatial quality and quality of life. We used the entrance pavilion of Baoshengli North Community as a case study to explore how spatial design and layout can meet residents’ psychological and social needs. Adopting a mixed-methods approach, combining field observation, behavioral mapping, a questionnaire (Total = 105), in-depth interviews, and statistical analysis, a post-occupancy evaluation (POE) was conducted on spatial effectiveness and social functions. The results show that user-oriented spatial design, safety, esthetic quality, and inclusive functions significantly enhance residents’ spatial perception, willingness to use the space, and social interaction. Differentiated spatial preferences and potential conflicts among diverse resident groups were also identified. Targeted design interventions can effectively strengthen the connection between spatial use and subjective perception, and participatory and equitable strategies help promote social harmony and justice. This study enriches the post-occupancy evaluation system for the renewal of old communities from psychological and social dimensions, and provides practical references for user-centered, inclusive, and sustainable public space design in urban renewal practices. One limitation of this study is that data were collected over a single period, which restricts the analysis of seasonal impacts on spatial usage. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Community Resilience and Urban Sustainability: A Global Perspective)
Show Figures

Figure 1

32 pages, 4252 KB  
Article
Heritage and Resilience: Sustainable Recovery of Historic Syrian Cities
by Emad Noaime and Mohammed Mashary Alnaim
Buildings 2025, 15(14), 2403; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15142403 - 9 Jul 2025
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 4482
Abstract
This study investigates the challenges and opportunities of balancing cultural preservation, tourism investment, and community resilience in historic Syrian cities during the post-war recovery period. The Syrian conflict has imposed considerable harm upon the nation’s cultural heritage, encompassing UNESCO World Heritage sites, thereby [...] Read more.
This study investigates the challenges and opportunities of balancing cultural preservation, tourism investment, and community resilience in historic Syrian cities during the post-war recovery period. The Syrian conflict has imposed considerable harm upon the nation’s cultural heritage, encompassing UNESCO World Heritage sites, thereby interrupting not only the urban infrastructure but also local economies and social networks. Utilizing a comprehensive methodology that includes a literature review, stakeholder interviews, and local surveys, this research investigates the potential for aligning cultural preservation with tourism investment to promote sustainable economic revitalization while simultaneously enhancing social cohesion and community resilience. The results underscore the significance of inclusive governance, participatory planning, and capacity enhancement to guarantee that post-conflict urban redevelopment fosters enduring environmental, social, and cultural sustainability. By framing the Syrian case within the broader context of global urban sustainability and resilience discourse, the study offers valuable insights for policymakers, urban planners, and heritage managers working in post-conflict or post-disaster environments worldwide. In the end, the study highlights that the revitalization of historic cities transcends being a simple technical or economic endeavor; it is a complex process of re-establishing identity, strengthening communities, and fostering sustainable, resilient urban futures. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Community Resilience and Urban Sustainability: A Global Perspective)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 2862 KB  
Article
Green Infrastructure and Climate Resilience of Urban Neighborhoods: What Can the Citizens Do Together?
by Đurica Marković, Miloš Gvozdić and Saja Kosanović
Buildings 2025, 15(3), 446; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15030446 - 31 Jan 2025
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3043
Abstract
This study began from the assumption that community self-organization, characterized by independent action without external control, could be a suitable approach to developing green infrastructure and strengthening climate resilience in urban neighborhoods in Serbia. The study employed a mixed methods approach to verify [...] Read more.
This study began from the assumption that community self-organization, characterized by independent action without external control, could be a suitable approach to developing green infrastructure and strengthening climate resilience in urban neighborhoods in Serbia. The study employed a mixed methods approach to verify this assumption, combining a technical case study and citizen survey analysis. Technical simulations demonstrated that self-organized community interventions on green infrastructure could contribute to climate resilience, even in neighborhoods with unfavorable conditions. However, the survey uncovered significant social constraints that cannot be resolved within the community, including a perceived lack of internal capacity; belief in the primacy of external actors; moderate cohesion level; lack of community platforms; limited understanding of the interconnections between resilience, climate change, and the role of green infrastructure; limited environmental literacy; and unclear collective action benefits. Based on these findings, the study proposed a multi-level and multi-phase model for improving neighborhood green infrastructure. The model emphasizes participatory citizen collaboration and applies to the current context of Serbian urban neighborhoods. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Community Resilience and Urban Sustainability: A Global Perspective)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

18 pages, 1271 KB  
Review
Climate-Resilient Housing Research in Australia: A Comprehensive Review
by Xiao Ma, Chunyan Yang, Dorsa Fatourehchi and Duanfang Lu
Buildings 2025, 15(21), 3885; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15213885 - 27 Oct 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1798
Abstract
Australia’s residential sector faces mounting climate adaptation challenges. Residential buildings contribute over 10% of national carbon emissions and are increasingly exposed to intensifying extreme weather events, including bushfires, floods, and heatwaves. While previous reviews have examined specific mitigation strategies or impacts of individual [...] Read more.
Australia’s residential sector faces mounting climate adaptation challenges. Residential buildings contribute over 10% of national carbon emissions and are increasingly exposed to intensifying extreme weather events, including bushfires, floods, and heatwaves. While previous reviews have examined specific mitigation strategies or impacts of individual hazards, no synthesis has traced how climate-resilient housing research has evolved across multiple hazard types and design approaches in the Australian context. This study addresses this gap through a longitudinal analysis of 36 peer-reviewed articles (2009–2025) identified via Scopus and analyzed thematically. The findings reveal a significant paradigm shift: early research (2009–2018) focused predominantly on energy efficiency and carbon mitigation through passive design and building performance optimization, whereas the recent literature (2019–2025) emphasizes comprehensive adaptation frameworks integrating hazard-specific resilience strategies, technological innovations, and socio-political considerations. This synthesis identifies emerging priorities, informing future research agendas and evidence-based policymaking for climate adaptation in Australia’s residential sector. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Community Resilience and Urban Sustainability: A Global Perspective)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop