Recent Advancements in Wound Healing and Repair

A special issue of Bioengineering (ISSN 2306-5354). This special issue belongs to the section "Regenerative Engineering".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 July 2025 | Viewed by 1672

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Institute of Chinese Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China
Interests: bone; mesenchymal stem cell; osteoporosis

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Recent advancements in wound healing and repair have introduced innovative approaches, paving the way for faster and more effective recovery. These developments encompass the use of bioactive dressings, growth factors, stem cell therapy, and tissue engineering to enhance tissue regeneration and minimize scarring. Emphasizing personalized medicine, researchers are crafting tailored treatment strategies that address the unique needs of each patient.

Key research areas in this field include identifying biomarkers for wound healing, developing novel therapies, and investigating the microbiome's role in the healing process. Additionally, advancements in imaging technologies and computer modeling are offering new insights into the mechanisms of wound healing, ultimately improving treatment outcomes.

Dr. Wing Sum Siu
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Bioengineering is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • wound healing
  • wound repair
  • bioactive dressings
  • stem cell therapy
  • tissue engineering
  • chronic wounds
  • biomaterials
  • imaging technologies
  • nanoparticles
  • antibacterial properties
  • biopolymers
  • wound dressing
  • cell and molecular biology

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

12 pages, 2825 KiB  
Article
Comparison of Tissue-Engineered Dermis with Micronized Adipose Tissue and Artificial Dermis for Facial Reconstruction Following Skin Cancer Resection
by Kyu-Il Lee, Won-Seok Song, Seung-Kyu Han, Kyung-Chul Moon, Seong-Ho Jeong and Eun-Sang Dhong
Bioengineering 2025, 12(2), 145; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12020145 - 3 Feb 2025
Viewed by 1012
Abstract
Our group has previously demonstrated that tissue-engineered dermis containing cultured fibroblasts or adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction cells is superior to artificial dermis in terms of scar quality for covering facial defects. However, using these cells for clinical applications requires Food and Drug Administration [...] Read more.
Our group has previously demonstrated that tissue-engineered dermis containing cultured fibroblasts or adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction cells is superior to artificial dermis in terms of scar quality for covering facial defects. However, using these cells for clinical applications requires Food and Drug Administration approval and involves complex procedures for cell culture or isolation. This retrospective study aimed to compare effects of tissue-engineered dermis containing micronized adipose tissue (MAT) and artificial dermis for facial reconstruction. Tissue-engineered dermis consisting of MAT seeded on artificial dermis was applied in 30 cases, while artificial dermis without MAT was grafted in 35 cases. Healing time and severities of scar contraction, color mismatch, and landmark distortion at one year after healing were evaluated. Wounds in the tissue-engineered dermis group re-epithelialized in 30.0 ± 4.3 days compared to 34.3 ± 5.4 days in the artificial dermis group (p < 0.05). The average dE2000 score in color mismatch analysis was 4.9 ± 1.7 in the tissue-engineered dermis group and 5.1 ± 1.7 in the artificial dermis group (p = 0.57). The extent of scar contraction was 16.2 ± 12.3% in the tissue-engineered dermis group and 23.2 ± 12.8% in the artificial dermis group (p < 0.05). The average severity grade of landmark distortion was 0.20 ± 0.50 in the tissue-engineered dermis group and 0.50 ± 0.71 in the artificial dermis group (p < 0.05). These findings indicate that tissue-engineered dermis grafts containing MAT are superior to artificial dermis grafts for facial reconstruction in terms of healing time, scar contraction, and landmark distortion severity. However, there was no significant difference in color mismatch between the two groups. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advancements in Wound Healing and Repair)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Review

Jump to: Research

16 pages, 581 KiB  
Review
Review on Current Advancements in Facilitation of Burn Wound Healing
by Wing Sum Siu, Hui Ma and Ping Chung Leung
Bioengineering 2025, 12(4), 428; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12040428 - 18 Apr 2025
Viewed by 167
Abstract
Burns are common injuries, but their treatment remains challenging due to the complex nature of the wound healing process. Burn wounds are classified into different categories based on their size and depth. Treatment modalities vary significantly across these categories, primarily focusing on the [...] Read more.
Burns are common injuries, but their treatment remains challenging due to the complex nature of the wound healing process. Burn wounds are classified into different categories based on their size and depth. Treatment modalities vary significantly across these categories, primarily focusing on the inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling phases of burn wound healing. This review summarizes current research on various approaches to enhance burn wound recovery, including advancements in wound dressings, the use of platelet-rich plasma, stem cells, their soluble factors primarily in the form of secretomes or extracellular vesicles, and nano-technologies. Additionally, advancements in modernized traditional medicine are discussed to give a new aspect for burn wound healing. This review also summarizes the barriers in translating bench research to clinical practice in burn wound treatment methods. For an effective translation, researchers and industrial partners should work more closely, while regulatory bodies should streamline the approval procedure. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advancements in Wound Healing and Repair)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop