Advancing Spinal Disorders Diagnosis with Artificial Intelligence

A special issue of Bioengineering (ISSN 2306-5354). This special issue belongs to the section "Biosignal Processing".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 January 2027 | Viewed by 2278

Editor


E-Mail
Guest Editor
Medical Metrics, 2000 Bering Dr, Houston, TX 77057, USA
Interests: spine; diagnostic imaging; biomechanics; medical image analysis; medical and biomedical image processing; musculoskeletal disorders; medical imaging

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The accurate, reproducible, and clinically meaningful characterization of spinal disorders remains a foundational challenge in musculoskeletal medicine. While substantial progress has been made in relation to automating the measurement of isolated features—such as spinal alignment, intervertebral motion, disc degeneration, stenosis, and deformity—these structural metrics often show only weak-to-moderate associations with patients’ symptoms, disabilities, and long-term treatment outcomes when considered in isolation.

Because spinal disorders are inherently multifactorial, advancing patient care requires a paradigm shift: moving away from isolated anatomical descriptions toward validated, patient-specific models that integrate structural, functional, and clinical data into actionable prognostic streams.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is uniquely positioned to drive this transition. Beyond standard image segmentation, advanced AI architectures can harmonize unstructured clinical records, integrate continuous data from wearables, model complex biomechanical relationships, and provide real-time quality feedback loops during image acquisition. However, automated measurement is merely the entry point. The field urgently requires rigorous evidence demonstrating how these models generalize across diverse populations, how they integrate into existing clinical workflows, and whether they measurably improve patient outcomes or reduce the cost of care.

This Special Issue, "Advancing Spinal Disorders Diagnosis with Artificial Intelligence," seeks original research, comprehensive reviews, technical reports, and clinically oriented validation studies that bridge the gap between proof-of-concept AI development and its real-world clinical implementation.

We invite high-quality submissions centered around three core thematic pillars:

Pillar 1: Advanced Automated Phenotyping and Functional Biomechanics

  • Dynamic and Kinetic Imaging: AI-based assessment of spinal alignment, intervertebral motion, spinal instability, and loss of motion segment integrity from radiographs, CT, MRI, ultrasound, and dynamic modalities.
  • Mechanistic and Computational Modeling: AI-assisted biomechanical, finite element, or mechanistic modeling of traumatic, degenerative, inflammatory, and postsurgical spinal processes.
  • Trauma and Acute Care Support: AI-enhanced assessment of spinal trauma, including ligamentous injury, occult fractures, fracture stability, and acute triage decision-making.

Pillar 2: Multimodal Fusion and Predictive Analytics

  • Multimodal Data Integration: Novel architectures combining imaging features with clinical notes, physical examination findings, patient-reported outcomes (PROMs), laboratory data, and wearable sensor metrics.
  • LLM and NLP Applications: Large language model enablement for the extraction, synthesis, and harmonization of structured and unstructured electronic health record (EHR) data relevant to spinal pathology.
  • Personalized Reference Models: Demographically conditioned or patient-specific reference models that account for age, sex, body habitus, prior surgical interventions, and longitudinal degenerative changes.

Pillar 3: Clinical Translation, Workflow Integration, and Value-Based Care

  • Upstream Quality and Acquisition Feedback: AI methods providing rapid feedback to technologists or clinicians to optimize image acquisition, motion protocols, positioning, and data completeness.
  • Companion Diagnostics and Treatment Selection: AI-driven models targeting specific interventions, including biologics, motion-preserving procedures, decompression, fusion deformity correction, and targeted rehabilitation.
  • Validation, Trust, and Economics: Multi-site external validation, prospective clinical trials, uncertainty estimation, explainability (XAI), and health economic or cost-effectiveness analyses evaluating the impact of AI on care pathways.

We look forward to your contributions that aim to buildi a more objective, reproducible, and predictive framework for spinal diagnostics.

Dr. John Hipp
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-anonymized peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Bioengineering is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • spine
  • spinal disorders
  • artificial intelligence
  • machine learning
  • deep learning
  • computer-aided diagnosis
  • medical imaging
  • dynamic imaging
  • intervertebral motion
  • spinal instability
  • motion segment integrity
  • degenerative spine disease
  • spinal stenosis
  • trauma
  • spondylolisthesis
  • multimodal AI
  • clinical decision support
  • natural language processing
  • computational biomechanics

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

19 pages, 5229 KB  
Article
Automated Metrics for the Diagnosis of Instability Between the 2nd and 7th Cervical Vertebrae
by John Hipp, Charles Reitman, Christopher Chaput, Mathew Gornet and Trevor Grieco
Bioengineering 2026, 13(3), 258; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering13030258 - 24 Feb 2026
Viewed by 1637
Abstract
Diagnosing cervical spine instability with flexion-extension radiographs is challenging, as current guidelines are based on limited cadaver studies and do not adequately account for level, vertebral size, or patient effort. There is a need for automated cervical instability metrics anchored to normative reference [...] Read more.
Diagnosing cervical spine instability with flexion-extension radiographs is challenging, as current guidelines are based on limited cadaver studies and do not adequately account for level, vertebral size, or patient effort. There is a need for automated cervical instability metrics anchored to normative reference data, accompanied by evidence on how often abnormal findings occur in real clinical populations and which soft-tissue injury patterns they can detect. We developed and evaluated fully automated, radiographic-based cervical intervertebral motion (IVM) metrics—adapted from prior lumbar methods—using an FDA-cleared analysis pipeline that segments C2–C7 and derives rotation, translation, disc heights, and regression-based instability indices. Normative reference data were first established from flexion-extension radiographs of 341 asymptomatic volunteers after excluding radiographically degenerated levels. Abnormality prevalence was then estimated in two symptomatic cohorts: pooled preoperative clinical-trial radiographs and 881 patients with symptoms attributed to motor-vehicle accidents, excluding levels with <5° rotation to reduce unreliable data due to insufficiently stressed spines. Finally, potential diagnostic performance was assessed in a controlled cadaveric ligament-sectioning model (12 cadavers) using ROC analysis and Youden’s J thresholds. Across clinical cohorts, objective IVM abnormalities were uncommon. Prevalence increased when studies demonstrated adequate total C2–C7 motion, emphasizing the importance of patient effort. In cadavers, vertical instability metrics were most discriminative (AUC 0.96–0.97) with high sensitivity (0.89) and perfect specificity at optimal thresholds, whereas translation changed minimally with sectioning. These results support regression-based instability indices as promising candidates for standardized, physiology-guided cervical instability assessment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advancing Spinal Disorders Diagnosis with Artificial Intelligence)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop