Background: Assessing food and nutrient intake is an important yet challenging component of nutrition research, particularly in populations at higher risk for dietary underreporting.
Objective: To evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary measurement characteristics of augmenting interviewer-administered 24 h dietary recalls with
[...] Read more.
Background: Assessing food and nutrient intake is an important yet challenging component of nutrition research, particularly in populations at higher risk for dietary underreporting.
Objective: To evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary measurement characteristics of augmenting interviewer-administered 24 h dietary recalls with a photo-based mobile food record application (mCC: my Circadian Clock).
Design: This was a randomized cross-over feasibility study in which each participant completed two sets of three 24 h dietary recalls. One set consisted of standard interviewer-administered recalls, while the other incorporated dietary intake captured via the mCC app during the 24 h preceding the recall to guide the interview.
Participants: Participants (n = 10) were adults aged 18–65 years with obesity (BMI > 30 kg/m
2) and less than a college-level education, recruited from a general community setting.
Main Outcome Measures: Primary feasibility outcomes included recall adherence, protocol completion, participant burden, and usability of the mobile application. Secondary and exploratory outcomes included average energy intake (kcal/day), number of food items and eating occasions reported, Healthy Eating Index (HEI)-2015 scores, and recall duration.
Statistical Analyses: Descriptive statistics and paired
t-tests were used to explore differences between methods; analyses were considered exploratory and hypothesis-generating.
Results: All enrolled participants completed every scheduled recall, resulting in 100% adherence and protocol completion. Most participants (70%) rated the mCC app as easy or very easy to use, although 60% reported greater burden with the Augmented Recalls. Average energy intake was 274 kcal/day lower with the augmented method compared with Standard Recalls (95% CI: −597, 50;
p = 0.09), with no clear differences observed in reported food items, eating occasions, HEI-2015 scores, or recall duration.
Conclusions: Augmenting interviewer-administered 24 h dietary recalls with a photo-based mobile food record is feasible and acceptable in adults with obesity, though it did not demonstrate clear improvements in dietary intake capture in this small feasibility sample. These findings provide practical guidance for refining technology-assisted recall protocols and informing the design of future, adequately powered studies.
Full article