Next Article in Journal
Topological Feature Extraction for Interpretable Cancer Tissue Classification
Previous Article in Journal
Federated Learning-Driven Digital Twin: A Privacy-Preserving AI Approach for Crisis Logistics
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Statement of Peer Review †

by
Mustapha Hlyal
1,* and
Abdessamad Ait El-Cadi
2
1
Center of Excellence in Logistics (CELOG), ESITH, Casablanca BP 7731, Morocco
2
LAMIH, UMR CNRS 8201, Université Polytechnique Hauts-de-France, Le Mont Houy, 59313 Valenciennes, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
All papers in this volume are presented at the 1st International Conference on Smart Management in Industrial and Logistics Engineering (SMILE 2025), 16–19 April 2025, Casablanca, Morocco.
Eng. Proc. 2025, 97(1), 57; https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025097057
Published: 22 October 2025
In submitting conference proceedings to Engineering Proceedings, the volume editors of the proceedings certify to the publisher that all papers published in this volume have been subjected to peer review administered by the volume editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal.
  • Type of peer review: Double-blind.
  • Conference submission management system: Google Forms (used for submission collection; reviews and communication managed manually via email).
  • Number of submissions sent for review: 117.
  • Number of submissions accepted: 75.
  • Number of submissions published: 55.
  • Acceptance rate (number of submissions accepted/number of submissions received): 64 %.
  • Average number of reviews per paper: 2.
  • Total number of reviewers involved: 35.
  • Additional information on the review process:
    Each paper was evaluated by reviewers with relevant subject matter expertise.
    Review criteria included relevance to the conference theme, originality, scientific contribution, methodological quality, and clarity of presentation.
    Of the 75 papers accepted through peer review, 20 were withdrawn or presented without intent to publish at the authors’ request. The final proceedings include 56 peer-reviewed and finalized papers.
    The reviewer evaluation form used during the double-blind peer review process is attached as supporting documentation.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hlyal, M.; El-Cadi, A.A. Statement of Peer Review. Eng. Proc. 2025, 97, 57. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025097057

AMA Style

Hlyal M, El-Cadi AA. Statement of Peer Review. Engineering Proceedings. 2025; 97(1):57. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025097057

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hlyal, Mustapha, and Abdessamad Ait El-Cadi. 2025. "Statement of Peer Review" Engineering Proceedings 97, no. 1: 57. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025097057

APA Style

Hlyal, M., & El-Cadi, A. A. (2025). Statement of Peer Review. Engineering Proceedings, 97(1), 57. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025097057

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop