In submitting conference proceedings to Engineering Proceedings, the volume editors of the proceedings certify to the publisher that all papers published in this volume have been subjected to peer review administered by the volume editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal.
- Type of peer review: single-blind
- Conference submission management system: EasyChair
- Number of submissions sent for review: 31
- Number of submissions accepted: 19
- Acceptance rate (number of submissions accepted/number of submissions received): 60%
- Average number of reviews per paper: 2 to 3
- Total number of reviewers involved: 13 reviewers
- Any additional information on the review process: Reviews are based on the extended abstracts. They consist of expectations and recommendations about the scientific paper, should it be accepted. Reviewers declare their confidence and rank each abstract from strong reject (−3) to strong accept (+3), and decisions are based on a weighted average score.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).