1. Introduction
China and Italy both possess long-standing operatic traditions that continue to hold significant cultural value. Traditional Chinese opera, particularly Peking Opera, is widely recognized as one of the most representative performative cultures in China [
1], while Italian opera is often regarded as a composite art form that integrates music, drama, and visual spectacle [
2]. Both traditions are inscribed by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) as Intangible Cultural Heritage [
3,
4]. Historically rooted in courtly and elite contexts, these performative forms have gradually evolved into publicly accessible performing arts embedded within contemporary cultural systems.
However, opera institutions in both countries face increasing pressures. Financial constraints have intensified in recent years, with reductions in public funding observed in both Italy [
2] and China [
5], further exacerbated by the impact of COVID-19. At the same time, expanding the viewer base remains a persistent task. Italian opera audiences continue to age, with a loss of broader popular appeal and participation concentrated among established groups and familiar experience modes [
6]; in China, younger generations increasingly engage with opera through digital platforms, but less often as regular theatre audiences [
7]. The contrast reflects uneven patterns of engagement shaped by the divergence between traditional social settings and digitally mediated exposure. In turn, participation is no longer defined by attendance alone, but depends on how opera aligns with social identity, lifestyles, and the visibility of cultural engagement. This trend therefore underscores the significance of the next generation, who remain essential for ensuring long-term sustainability and transmission of cultural heritage [
8]. Against this backdrop, the shared challenge of audience renewal faced by both countries provides a valuable comparative case study for examining how broader social conditions influence participation. In this sense, the comparison does not aim to equate the two traditions at an artistic level, but to investigate how individual behaviour is impacted within respective institutional and infrastructural contexts.
In addition, although prior research has investigated the impact of measures such as economic factors, environmental elements, digital communication, and educational interventions on enhancing the traditional opera experience, they are frequently addressed in isolation, limiting understanding of how multiple conditions jointly affect young audiences’ engagement. Despite recent adaptation and global expansion of opera institutions across Europe and Asia under public investment and cultural policies [
2,
6], comparative studies between China and Italy remain limited. This gap underscores the need to situate youth participation within broader institutional and policy frameworks.
On the other hand, current discussions have mainly focused on individual or institutional dimensions, while the conditions shaping participation remain less explored. In cultural policy and heritage studies, infrastructure is increasingly regarded as a systemic environment that both organizes the circulation of cultural resources and is experienced by the public [
9]. Building on this perspective, the research conceptualizes opera engagement as emerging from a set of infrastructural conditions that enable access to, interpretation of, and sustained engagement. Rather than focusing solely on audience preferences, aesthetic forms, or artistic innovation, the infrastructural lens emphasizes how a series of facilities collectively build the possibility of participation. We thus examine three interconnected aspects: (1) access infrastructure, including spatial and economic accessibility; (2) experiential infrastructure, encompassing environmental and experiential quality; and (3) mediating infrastructure, such as educational and digital mediation.
We adopt an exploratory qualitative design based on focus group interviews with university-aged participants in China and Italy to examine how young audiences engage with opera. By collecting their explorations, expectations, and perceived barriers, it identifies how access, experience, and mediation contribute to participation across cultural systems. Finally, by identifying similarities and differences in attitudes, the comparative analysis reveals shared concerns and context-specific patterns, informing strategies for service provision and audience development worldwide.
The study addresses the following research questions:
What factors influence young people’s willingness to attend traditional opera performances and theatres?
How do young audiences in China and Italy perceive opera culture within contemporary urban and media contexts?
What infrastructural conditions may enhance future opera experiences and support generational renewal?
The remainder of this paper is structured as follows.
Section 2 presents a review of relevant research on aspects related to opera engagement.
Section 3 explains the preparation and implementation of the focus group interviews.
Section 4 illustrates some research results.
Section 5 discusses cross-cultural perceptions, infrastructural conditions, and study limitations. Lastly,
Section 6 concludes the article.
3. Methodology
The study employs a qualitative approach to examine young audiences’ perceptions of traditional opera experiences in these two countries. The process is divided into several stages, as shown in
Figure 1, and is described in more detail in the following sections.
3.1. Study Designs
The comparative design examines participation patterns in Chinese and Italian opera, with aesthetic differences not being the primary concern. Focus group interviews were conducted to explore factors influencing willingness to engage [
37], and the data were analyzed using content analysis to identify key themes [
38].
3.2. Participants
The subjects of the focus group are young people from China and Italy. The inclusion criteria are as follows: participants are between 18 and 30 years old, have received or are currently receiving university education, and are familiar with one another or share similar experiences [
39], such as watching operas or attending theatres (concerts, dramas, etc.). The study also focused on participants without reported visual or auditory impairments in order to explore general opera experience under standard perceptual conditions. These requirements are based on the assumption that young participants within an appropriate age range possess sufficient time, cultural awareness, and willingness to express their views, facilitating the implementation of the study. The research therefore further highlights university-educated urban young adults, representing a culturally engaged segment of the potential opera audience. This sampling strategy aims to capture insights from individuals more likely to be exposed to theatre-related environments.
All participants were recruited through social media platforms of Chinese and Italian young people, such as WeChat and WhatsApp. The expansion of samples continued until no new information emerged from the interviews. A total of 8 focus groups finally participated, including 4 groups per country; each group consisted of 4 to 5 young people, totaling 35 participants. They were all urban residents, unmarried and childless, with no stable income. Additionally, 45.71% of them have backgrounds in architecture, art, design, and cultural heritage, while 34.29% indicate a deep understanding of traditional opera. The emphasis on these high-cultural-capital audiences is to maximize effective feedback within limited resources.
We used codes to distinguish the data, including country (CN = China; IT = Italy), focus group (FG), and participant (P).
Table 1 summarizes the sample characteristics, while the complete demographic profile of participants is provided in
Appendix A.
3.3. Focus Group Interviews
This research adopted a flexible focus group design, allowing participants to choose between virtual meetings and in-person discussions at a pre-agreed venue. In total, 6 groups (3 groups per country) participated online via VooV Meeting (Version 3, Shenzhen Tencent Computer Systems Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China) and Zoom (Version 6, Zoom Video Communications, Inc., San Jose, CA, USA), while 2 groups (1 group per country) attended in-person interviews at the Piacenza Campus of Politecnico di Milano. Each session lasted approximately 1.5 h.
To ensure procedural consistency and intercultural comparability across both countries, a standardized semi-structured discussion guide was employed. All interviews were facilitated by the same moderator, following the same question sequence and prompts to minimize facilitation bias.
The discussion topics were derived from the three theoretical dimensions identified in the literature review and concretized into six thematic areas: theatre attendance, cost and participation choices, sensory perception, performance production, learning pathways, and technological channels (see
Table 2). This structure ensured conceptual alignment between the theoretical framework and the data collection instrument.
Before formal interviews, short video clips and VR materials (see
Figure 2 and
Figure 3) were presented as memory prompts to help participants recall relevant experiences. Such digital media were not functioned as experimental interventions, and their effects were neither compared nor evaluated.
During the interviews, participants were encouraged to elaborate on their personal experiences, feelings, and perceptions of traditional opera, theatre spaces, and performance environments. The group format was expected to stimulate shared reflection and mutual insight among participants with similar backgrounds [
37].
Interviews with Chinese participants were conducted in Mandarin, and those with Italian participants in English to ensure smooth communication. All sessions were recorded and transcribed verbatim in their original languages immediately after each interview, with transcriptions were manually prepared by the research team and cross-checked for accuracy. For reporting purposes, selected Chinese excerpts were translated into English and verified by bilingual researchers.
At the end, each participant received a gift (or gift money) for their time and contributions.
3.4. Data Analysis
All processed textual data were imported into NVivo (Version 12, Lumivero, Denver, CO, USA) to extract representative statements and nodes for systematic content analysis [
40]. It followed a four-stage procedure: decontextualization, recontextualization, categorization, and compilation. When materials meet the following conditions, they are aggregated: (1) appeared across multiple focus groups, (2) represented structurally significant participation conditions rather than isolated opinions, and (3) demonstrated theoretical relevance to infrastructural dimensions.
Open coding was first conducted to identify recurring expanded content, followed by axial coding to cluster related categories and establish thematic relationships, ultimately refining them into distinct domains. Coding decisions were reviewed through peer discussion to enhance analytical reliability. To enhance the transparency of the analysis, this process followed a hierarchical structure linking raw statements, content nodes, categories, thematic domains, and domain. First, interview excerpts were coded into content nodes representing specific participation conditions. These nodes were then grouped into broader categories to reflect recurring patterns in the focus groups. Finally, categories common to both national datasets were synthesized into cross-cultural themes and domains to serve as the basis for comparative interpretation. This stepped procedure ensures that the comparative analysis was grounded in systematically synthesized empirical observations rather than isolated statements.
The analysis focused on cross-cultural differences and intrinsic motivations within audiences’ narratives, advancing an interpretive account of the processes shaping youth participation in opera.
3.5. Informed Consent
Before the focus group interviews, all participants were informed that the online or in-person interviews would be photographed, recorded, and audio-taped, and their verbal consent was obtained. All data were anonymized and maintained confidentiality.
5. Discussion
5.1. Participation Patterns Across Cultural Contexts
The findings show that youth participation in opera is influenced by multiple interrelated factors within specific cultural contexts. Audiences in both China and Italy expressed continued recognition of opera as an art form while emphasizing the necessity of creating favourable conditions to enhance perception.
In the Chinese context, theatre attendance was frequently described as a planned and purposeful activity, often associated with newly developed cultural districts in major cities like Beijing and Shenzhen. This perception may contribute to a heightened sense of formality. Another observation in this regard is that people have a strong interest in photographing theatre buildings, which functions as a form of cultural display. This practice is rooted in cultural capital and social distinction [
41], concepts that are now increasingly extended into digital circulation. Such a shift reflects a transition from traditional and attendance-based participation to networked forms of visibility [
42].
Moreover, subtitles, background explanations, and digital tools were considered particularly important in facilitating understanding. Trending productions and well-known performers were described as reducing uncertainty and encouraging initial encounter. Price sensitivity and preference for group participation were repeatedly mentioned, suggesting that affordability and social support function as entry-oriented mechanisms.
In Italy, opera houses were described as embedded within historic urban cores and long-standing cultural routines, such as Teatro alla Scala in Milan. Attendance was often associated with family traditions and established social networks. Subtitles were viewed as supportive but not essential, reflecting familiarity with operatic conventions. Participants expressed caution towards extensive digital integration, emphasizing preservation of live atmosphere and performance continuity. Small-scale productions are viewed as supplementary initiatives, not the primary focus. Although Italian participants similarly acknowledged pricing concerns and group attendance patterns, these were framed within habitual participation rather than primary contact.
It should be noted that participants in the Italian group placed particular emphasis on the opera’s credibility, reflecting expectations of authenticity. This may be linked to the long-term institutional stability of opera in Italy [
43], where audience engagement has depended on sustained performance quality. As a result, the artistic standard becomes a key condition for participation, affecting attitudes for both performance and innovation.
Taken together, the contemporary comparison suggests two participation modes. In contexts where opera is considered as less embedded in everyday routines, mediation and affordability operate as mechanisms facilitating entry; while in settings where opera is socially integrated, engagement appears preserved through continuity and familiarity. Within this framework, visual documentation and adherence to cultural norms are essential to enhancing the experience.
5.2. Reframing Opera Engagement Through Infrastructural Conditions
The concept of infrastructural conditions serves as an analytical method that links spatial accessibility, experiential environments, and mediating mechanisms to form a unified system of participation. Engagement unfolds through artistic appreciation alongside embodied spaces and media representations that frame the encounter with opera. These elements operate in combination across different stages of participation, influencing how individuals perceive and evaluate opera, as well as whether they will revisit opera performances over time. In this sense, opera experience operates through the interaction of access, experiential, and mediating infrastructures.
For the access infrastructure, it determines the threshold at which engagement becomes feasible. Venue positioning and investment management influence not only attendance frequency, but also the perceived openness of opera as a cultural practice. Spatial embedding situates opera within broader urban routines, while economic feasibility impacts whether preliminary participation can occur. These entry-related structures form experience before aesthetic interpretation begins, emphasizing that participation is conditioned by material and financial accessibility.
Within the performance context, the experiential infrastructure contributes to how opera is evaluated and remembered. Architectural configuration and staging design form the theatre settings through which live performance is encountered. Audience responses demonstrate that appreciation is closely intertwined with embodied and sensory experience. The atmosphere and artistic expression blend together, developing attentiveness, immersion, and satisfaction. Experiential quality thus establishes an integral dimension of cultural value, building how opera is perceived and remembered.
Interpretation is further supported by the mediating infrastructure that connects operatic conventions with contemporary audiences. Educational exposure, digital platforms, and emerging formats such as interactive media as explanatory tools. These mechanisms reduce uncertainty, facilitate comprehension, and take engagement away from the immediate performance. Mediation ultimately enables engagement to develop gradually, linking early cultural cultivation to sustained familiarity, empowering accessibility and experience.
Overall, engagement with opera appears to be reshaped by infrastructural conditions deployment operating before, during, and beyond the performance event. Accessibility options shape entry, experiential features influence reception, and mediating requirements support interpretation and continuity (see
Figure 7). Consequently, continued experience depends on the coordination between these components that embed opera within everyday urban life and contemporary media environments in contrast to traditional cultural display models.
5.3. Limitations
Several limitations should be acknowledged.
First, the study is based on focus groups with a small sample, which limits statistical generalizability. The findings reflect interpretive patterns within the selected participant groups and do not constitute the broader opera audience. In addition, participants were primarily young adults with relatively similar educational backgrounds, which may not represent wider demographic diversity. These findings should therefore be interpreted as exploratory insights into participation conditions among culturally receptive youth. Variations in age, gender, socioeconomic status, and nationality may significantly influence participation patterns, highlighting the need for future studies to examine more diverse audience groups.
Second, the comparison involves distinct operatic traditions, which complicates formal equivalence. Although the study focuses on current participation conditions rather than aesthetic comparison, cultural and historical differences between Chinese and Italian opera in the past and present inevitably inform audience experience. The results therefore emphasize experiential and structural dimensions, lacking direct comparability at the theatre studies and artistic appreciation level. The next phase of research could extend to examining how today’s audiences challenge traditional theories and operation paradigms of opera.
Third, digital mediation, including subtitles, social media dissemination, and immersive technologies such as VR, was discussed primarily in terms of the audience’s initial experience. While participants expressed interest in such enhancements, the study does not empirically evaluate their long-term effectiveness or potential tensions with the integrity of live performance. Differences in digital literacy and generational familiarity may also influence how such technologies are accepted. Future research may combine quantitative studies with digital experimentation methods to assess how interactive media engages with diverse audience segments.
Finally, the analysis is primarily based on self-reported perceptions, without drawing on observational data or institutional records, and may reflect retrospective interpretations or limited understandings. Future research could incorporate these resources to gain deeper insights into the relationship between audience discussions and cultural policies.
6. Conclusions
This study demonstrated how young audiences in China and Italy experience with traditional opera under contemporary contexts, approaching engagement as a question of infrastructural conditions. By situating this demographic within broader hybrid environments, this study offers exploratory insights into the shift from participatory practices to a conceptual framework for cultural exchange.
Building on this approach, three key conclusions can be drawn.
First, young people’s willingness to attend opera is formed by access and entry factors, performance environment and audience experience, and interpretive and mediating supports. Theatre setting, ticket price, group attendance, environmental comfort, artistic presentation, educational exposure, and communicative mediation collectively create the foundational structures that determine whether engagement becomes feasible, valuable, and repeatable.
Second, cross-national comparison reveals different experience logics. Chinese participants are more dependent on the media source and organized connections, resulting in more occasion-specific participation, while Italian audiences emphasize that opera remains embedded within historical city settings and social continuity, enabling more habitual engagement. These differences stemming from young audiences’ perspectives suggest that opera attendance is conditioned by broader urban and institutional configurations.
Third, infrastructural coordination emerges as a critical framework for institutional reflection. The findings demonstrate that youth participation is shaped by interplay elements operating across accessibility, experience, and mediation. Specifically, access infrastructure facilities whether participation becomes feasible; experiential infrastructure enhances how opera is perceived and evaluated during the event itself; and mediating infrastructure supports interpretation and reduces uncertainty, especially for first-time audiences.
Ultimately, this research examines the determinants influencing young audiences’ engagement with traditional opera. By identifying the infrastructural conditions underlying young people’s engagement, it highlights implications for opera institutions seeking to adapt their operational approaches and inform discussions on developing future audiences. These findings point towards comprehensive frameworks that integrate heritage practices into accessible and inclusive cultural environments within a global media context.