Abstract
Older adults are vulnerable to undernutrition, resulting in weight loss and adverse health outcomes, including a loss of independence and a lower quality of life. Adequate protein intake is particularly important for the maintenance of muscle health during ageing. The UK population reference intake for protein (0.75 g/kg/day) may not be sufficient to counteract the reduced responsiveness of older skeletal muscle to anabolic stimulus. Research suggests that 1.2 g/kg/day of protein may be optimal, considering distribution (25–30 g/meal) and leucine-rich sources typically found in animal protein, especially for those at high nutritional risk. PROMED-EX is a randomised controlled trial testing a PROtein-enriched MEDiterranean Diet, with or without Exercise on nutritional status and memory, in older adults (60+) at risk of undernutrition, with subjective memory decline. The current aim is to determine the baseline nutritional adequacy of adults enrolled in PROMED-EX. Participants completed 4-day food diaries at baseline. Diaries were analysed for energy and nutrients using Nutritics. Nutritional adequacy was determined by comparing sex- and age-specific UK dietary reference values (DRVs). Protein intake was also compared to higher recommended DRVs for older adults. Fifty participants (60% female; age 67 ± 6.0 years; BMI: 23.5 ± 2.8 kg/m2) were included. Insufficient energy intake in men (1803.4 ± 510.7 kcal/d) and women (1776.2 ± 508.7 kcal/d)) in the sample, with 22.0% meeting the energy DRVs. The risk of nutrient inadequacy was highest for fibre and vitamin D, with almost all failing to meet the DRVs. Less than 50% met nutritional adequacy for vitamin A, iodine, iron, magnesium, potassium, and selenium. Over 35% had suboptimal intakes for selected B vitamins (niacin, folate) and calcium. Most (82%) of the sample achieved the UK protein target of 0.75 g/kg/day, with only 34% meeting the higher 1.2 g/kg/day target. The mean protein intake was less than optimal for breakfast (12.3 ± 7.0 g) and lunch (17.1 ± 8.8 g), accounting for 17.3% and 24.1% total daily protein intake, and highest at dinner time (48.2%) at 34.3 ± 18.3 g. The primary protein contributors were ‘cereals’ (15.7%), followed by ‘dairy’ (14.9%), ‘processed meat’ (10.9%), ‘poultry’ (10.8%), and ‘red meat’ (10.5%). Increasing protein intakes at breakfast and lunch alongside leucine-rich sources could help achieve the optimal protein intake. The nutrient-dense PROMED-EX intervention may be beneficial for this at- risk population with suboptimal nutrient intakes.
Author Contributions
C.T.M. and N.A.W. drafted the manuscript. All authors (C.T.M., N.A.W., L.B., L.C.P.G.M.d.G., F.P., D.V., J.V.W.) contributed to the editing of the manuscript and revising it critically for intellectual content. The Trial Steering Committee approved this manuscript submission. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
PROMED-EX was funded by UKRI: Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (Grant Ref: BB/V019201/1). PROMED-EX is part of the European ‘PROMED-COG’ Project, funded under the umbrella of the European Joint Programming Initiative “A Healthy Diet for a Healthy Life” (JPI HDHL) and of the ERA NET Cofund ERA HDHL (GA N 696295 of the EU Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme).
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the UK Office for Research Ethics Committee (ref: 21/NW/0215).
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Data Availability Statement
Data available under request.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).