Skip to Content
ProceedingsProceedings
  • Abstract
  • Open Access

8 April 2026

2 Pages

Myopia in the Digital Era: An Integrative Review on the Impact of Screen Exposure on the Vision of Children Aged 6 to 12 Years †

,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
and
Faculty of Medicine, University of Rio Verde (UniRV), Luziânia 72815-450, GO, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Presented at the 6th International Congress on Health Innovation—INOVATEC 2025, Hybrid, 21–23 November 2025.
Introduction: The increase in childhood myopia in recent decades represents a public health challenge. Factors such as genetic predisposition, excessive use of screens, and less exposure to natural light appear with recurrence in studies, especially after the COVID-19 pandemic, when time in front of devices increased significantly. In addition to the visual consequences, research suggests impacts on neurocognitive and social development. Methodology: A review of studies published between 2019 and 2023 was carried out in scientific databases, including observational studies and meta-analyses on screen time and myopia in children and adolescents. Results: Research involving children aged 6 to 12 years shows that, in the 9 to 12 age group, 78.7% already had a smartphone and about 26% used screens for more than 2 hours a day. Meta-analyses indicate that increased exposure time to digital devices is associated with a more than doubled risk of developing myopia (OR ≈ 2.24 in cross-sectional studies and OR ≈ 2.39 in cohorts). Computers and tablets appear as the devices most related to the problem, while results with smartphones are less consistent. Factors such as less practice of outdoor activities, genetic predisposition, ethnicity and socioeconomic conditions also influence the progression of myopia throughout the age group studied. Conclusions: Current evidence reinforces that excessive use of screens contributes to the progression of myopia in children and adolescents. Prevention strategies should prioritize exposure to outdoor activities, limitation of screen time, and educational campaigns aimed at promoting eye health.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.G.L.M. and L.G.F.; methodology, R.S.B.; software, M.E.F.A.; validation, H.D.S.C.S., N.V.C. and H.C.S.; formal analysis, I.M.P.; investigation, A.C.C.; resources, L.G.L.M.; data curation, R.O.S.; writing—original draft preparation, L.G.L.M.; writing—review and editing, L.G.F.; visualization, R.S.B.; supervision, H.D.S.C.S.; project administration, L.G.L.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in https://doi.org/10.5935/0034-7280.20200077 (accessed on 16 September 2025). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1621687 (accessed on 16 September 2025). https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i6.28779 (accessed on 16 September 2025). https://doi.org/10.34119/bjhrv6n3-231 (accessed on 16 September 2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-19113-5 (accessed on 16 September 2025).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.