Next Article in Journal
Computational Screening of Membrane Protein Epitopes for Vaccine Development Against Trypanosoma brucei 
Previous Article in Journal
Proposal for a Multidimensional Digital Health Instrument for the Screening of Neurodevelopmental Disorders in Children and Adolescents
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

Development and Functionalization of Magnetic Nanoparticles for Extraction of Circulating DNA (cfDNA): Platform for Liquid Biopsy †

by
Daniel S. Ramos
1,2,*,
Yasmin R. C. L. Albuquerque
2,
Juliano A. Chaker
1 and
Fabio Pittella-Silva
2
1
Green Nanotechnology Laboratory (NAVE), University of Brasilia, Brasilia 72220-275, Brazil
2
Laboratory of Molecular Pathology of Cancer (Cancerlab), University of Brasilia, Brasilia 70910-900, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 6th International Congress on Health Innovation—INOVATEC 2025, Hybrid, 21–23 November 2025.
Proceedings 2026, 137(1), 127; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2026137127
Published: 24 March 2026
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 6th International Congress on Health Innovation—INOVATEC 2025)
Introduction: Liquid biopsy is an emerging and promising technique that enables the detection of molecular biomarkers in various body fluids, such as blood, urine, and saliva. Although conventional tissue biopsy remains the gold standard for tumor diagnosis, liquid biopsy offers several advantages, including its minimally invasive nature and its ability to provide valuable information for diagnosis, prognosis, treatment, and remission monitoring in oncology. The most commonly used marker in liquid biopsy is cell-free DNA (cfDNA), a small DNA fragment carrying information capable of detecting and characterizing cancer fingerprints. However, despite its potential, cfDNA analysis presents challenges. Its low concentration and susceptibility to contamination by genomic DNA (gDNA) require specialized extraction techniques. Nanotechnology emerges as a promising strategy to overcome these limitations. Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles, such as magnetite (Fe3O4) and maghemite (γ-Fe2O3), were functionalized with a silica (SiO2) coating to selectively interact with cfDNA fragments in biological samples. Thus, the main goal of this study was to synthesize magnetic nanoparticles with optimized size, surface area, and coating to extract and purify cfDNA from peripheral blood samples. Methodology: Magnetite and maghemite nanoparticles were synthesized via co-precipitation, functionalized with silica (SiO2), characterized, and their performance was compared with commercial magnetic beads for cfDNA extraction. Results: cfDNA extraction from peripheral blood was achieved, revealing performance differences between magnetite and maghemite nanoparticles. Conclusions: Silica-coated iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles proved to be a promising tool, achieving comparable performance to commercial kits for cfDNA extraction and purification.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.S.R., Y.R.C.L.A., J.A.C. and F.P.-S.; methodology, D.S.R., Y.R.C.L.A., J.A.C. and F.P.-S.; software, D.S.R., Y.R.C.L.A., J.A.C. and F.P.-S.; validation, D.S.R., Y.R.C.L.A., J.A.C. and F.P.-S.; formal analysis, D.S.R., Y.R.C.L.A., J.A.C. and F.P.-S.; investigation, D.S.R., Y.R.C.L.A., J.A.C. and F.P.-S.; resources, D.S.R., Y.R.C.L.A., J.A.C. and F.P.-S.; data curation, D.S.R., Y.R.C.L.A., J.A.C. and F.P.-S.; writing—original draft preparation, D.S.R., Y.R.C.L.A., J.A.C. and F.P.-S.; writing—review and editing, D.S.R., Y.R.C.L.A., J.A.C. and F.P.-S.; visualization, D.S.R., Y.R.C.L.A., J.A.C. and F.P.-S.; supervision, D.S.R., Y.R.C.L.A., J.A.C. and F.P.-S.; project administration, D.S.R., Y.R.C.L.A., J.A.C. and F.P.-S.; funding acquisition, D.S.R., Y.R.C.L.A., J.A.C. and F.P.-S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brasil (CAPES)—88887.207440/2025-00.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of Institutional Ethics Committee (CAAE number 65822222.4.0000.0030).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ramos, D.S.; Albuquerque, Y.R.C.L.; Chaker, J.A.; Pittella-Silva, F. Development and Functionalization of Magnetic Nanoparticles for Extraction of Circulating DNA (cfDNA): Platform for Liquid Biopsy. Proceedings 2026, 137, 127. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2026137127

AMA Style

Ramos DS, Albuquerque YRCL, Chaker JA, Pittella-Silva F. Development and Functionalization of Magnetic Nanoparticles for Extraction of Circulating DNA (cfDNA): Platform for Liquid Biopsy. Proceedings. 2026; 137(1):127. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2026137127

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ramos, Daniel S., Yasmin R. C. L. Albuquerque, Juliano A. Chaker, and Fabio Pittella-Silva. 2026. "Development and Functionalization of Magnetic Nanoparticles for Extraction of Circulating DNA (cfDNA): Platform for Liquid Biopsy" Proceedings 137, no. 1: 127. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2026137127

APA Style

Ramos, D. S., Albuquerque, Y. R. C. L., Chaker, J. A., & Pittella-Silva, F. (2026). Development and Functionalization of Magnetic Nanoparticles for Extraction of Circulating DNA (cfDNA): Platform for Liquid Biopsy. Proceedings, 137(1), 127. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2026137127

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop