Skip to Content
ProceedingsProceedings
  • Abstract
  • Open Access

10 March 2026

2 Pages

Leishmaniasis and Economic Invisibility: Epidemiology of a Neglected Disease and the Limits of Market Logic in Brazilian Healthcare—Epidemiological Study †

,
,
,
,
,
and
1
Applied Immunology and Morphology Research Centre (NuPMIA), Morphology Area, Faculty of Medicine, University of Brasilia, UnB, Brasília 70910-000, Brazil
2
Graduate Program in Tropical Medicine, University of Brasília, Brasilia 70910-000, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Presented at the 6th International Congress on Health Innovation—INOVATEC 2025, Hybrid, 21–23 November 2025.
Introduction: The low financial profitability of the treatment of neglected diseases, such as cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL), results in outdated treatments with limited efficacy and high toxicity. This perpetuates the persistence of the disease in socioeconomically vulnerable regions. This study aims to correlate the socioeconomic determinants of Brazilian states with the worsening situation of CL in Brazil, emphasizing the influence of marketization. Methodology: This is an epidemiological study (2014–2024) based on official Federal Government sources addressing the epidemiology of CL and socioeconomic aspects of Brazilian states (IBGE). Results: By cross-referencing data from the Ministry of Health and IBGE, we established a comparison between the risk stratification (low–very intense) of CL and the socioeconomic class (per capita household income) of Brazilian states. States with an average income ≤ R$1518, such as Acre, Rondônia, Pará, Mato Grosso, and Amazonas, are classified as having high to very intense risk, with an average incidence of cases (2014–2024) of 88.5, 39.1, 35.9, 37.7, and 22.4 per 100,000 inhabitants, respectively. In contrast, states like Paraná, Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo, Rio Grande do Sul, Santa Catarina, and the Federal District, with an average income close to or ≥R$3036, are classified as having low risk, with an average incidence of cases (2014–2024) of 4.5, 1.23, 0.79, 0.44, 0.37, and 0.15 per 100,000 inhabitants, respectively. Conclusions: It is observed that socioeconomically vulnerable states are directly associated with the precariousness of public policies, research, and innovation regarding CL.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.G.d.S., B.S.S., C.N.M., E.L.d.F., J.L.S.d.C., C.A.d.S. and A.S.D.; methodology, M.G.d.S., B.S.S., C.N.M., E.L.d.F., J.L.S.d.C., C.A.d.S. and A.S.D.; formal analysis, M.G.d.S., B.S.S., C.N.M., E.L.d.F., J.L.S.d.C., C.A.d.S. and A.S.D.; writing—original draft preparation, M.G.d.S., B.S.S., C.N.M., E.L.d.F., J.L.S.d.C., C.A.d.S. and A.S.D.; writing—review and editing, M.G.d.S., B.S.S., C.N.M., E.L.d.F., J.L.S.d.C., C.A.d.S. and A.S.D.; supervision, A.S.D.; project administration, M.G.d.S., B.S.S., C.N.M., E.L.d.F., J.L.S.d.C., C.A.d.S. and A.S.D.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is available under request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.