Skip to Content
ProceedingsProceedings
  • Abstract
  • Open Access

6 March 2026

2 Pages

Synergistic Effects of Low-Level UV and Hydrogen Peroxide in Reducing Airborne Influenza A (H1N1) †

,
,
and
Airmid Healthgroup, D24YH58 Dublin, Ireland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Presented at the 6th International Congress on Health Innovation—INOVATEC 2025, Hybrid, 21–23 November 2025.
Introduction: Influenza A (H1N1) is a highly contagious respiratory virus transmitted via droplets and aerosols, representing a major public health challenge. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a novel air decontamination technique based on the synergistic use of low-level ultraviolet (UV) light and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). Separately, these components show limited antiviral efficacy, but when combined, they generate reactive oxygen species that are approximately ten times more powerful than traditional disinfection methods. The process accelerates the decomposition of harmful viral particles, leaving behind only water and oxygen. Methodology: Experiments were conducted in a 28.5 m3 environmental chamber under controlled temperature and humidity. Six decay tests were performed: three control runs and three active runs with the UV–H2O2 system operating. Airborne Influenza A (H1N1) was aerosolised and sampled at multiple time points. Viral RNA concentrations were quantified using real-time qPCR. Results: Control runs showed stable airborne virus concentrations with a natural decay of only 22.9%. In contrast, the UV–H2O2 technique achieved rapid and consistent viral reduction, reaching 95.4% within 50–60 min in two test runs, and 95.6% in a third run with reduced UV exposure. Importantly, no harmful ozone generation was detected. Conclusion: The combined low-level UV and H2O2 technique provides a highly effective, safe, and sustainable approach for reducing airborne viral loads, demonstrating its strong potential to enhance indoor air quality and mitigate infectious disease transmission.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.S. and O.C.D.; methodology, A.B. and P.J.; formal analysis, P.J.; resources, A.S.; data curation, O.C.D.; writing—original draft preparation, P.J.; writing—review and editing, A.S. and O.C.D.; project administration, O.C.D.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

Arlo Bowe, Paula Jaramillo, Oliver C. Dsa and Angela Southey were employed by the Airmid Healthgroup. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.