Introduction: The three-period minimal surface (TPMS) structure has great potential in the fields of lightweight and energy absorption due to its high strength, high porosity, and self-supporting characteristics. However, previous studies have predominantly focused on aspects such as wall thickness, unit cell size, periodicity, and level set values. The impact of amplitude factors on the topological shape and mechanical properties of TPMS structures has not been fully elucidated.
Methods: Inspired by the amplitude characteristics of cuttlefish bone structure, this paper proposes a design method of TPMS structures with variable amplitude. Firstly, taking the classical Primitive, Gyroid, and Diamond structures as the research objects, the influence of amplitude on the topological morphology and relative density of TPMS structures was analyzed using the parametric method. Subsequently, the quasi-static compressive mechanical properties and energy absorption capacity of the Gyroid structure were studied through experiments and numerical simulations.
Results: The change in the amplitude led to a significant change in the topological morphology of the structure, but the maximum relative density of the structure only changed by 1.5%. The deformation modes of Gyroid structures of different amplitudes were identical, but as amplitude increased, mechanical properties and energy absorption capacity such as elastic modulus, yield strength and specific energy absorption increased.
Conclusions: The results indicated that the amplitude change has little effect on the relative density and deformation mode of the TPMS structure, but it can significantly regulate the mechanical properties of the structure on a large scale. With an increase in the amplitude factor, the densification strain of the structure slightly decreased, while the energy absorption capacity increased significantly. The research content can guide the design for the development of tissue scaffolds or energy-absorbing devices.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, X.M. and C.G.; methodology, X.M.; software, X.M.; validation, X.M., C.G. and X.W.; formal analysis, X.M.; investigation, X.M. and X.W.; resources, C.G.; data curation, X.M.; writing—original draft preparation, X.M.; writing—review and editing, C.G. and X.W.; project administration, C.G.; funding acquisition, C.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51875282) and the Research Fund of State Key Laboratory of Mechanics and Control for Aerospace Structures (Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics) (Grant No. 1005-ZAG23011).
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Dataset available on request from the authors.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).