Abstract
For the impulsive fractional-order system (IFrOS) of order , there have appeared some conflicting equivalent integral equations in existing studies. However, we find two fractional-order properties of piecewise function and use them to verify that these given equivalent integral equations have some defects to not be the equivalent integral equation of the IFrOS. For the IFrOS, its limit property shows the linear additivity of the impulsive effects. For the IFrOS, we use the limit analysis and the linear additivity of the impulsive effects to find its correct equivalent integral equation, which is a combination of some piecewise functions with two arbitrary constants; that is, the solution of the IFrOS is a general solution. Finally, a numerical example is given to show the equivalent integral equation and the non-uniqueness of the solution of the IFrOS.
Keywords:
impulsive fractional differential equations; equivalent integral equations; general solution; non-uniqueness of solution MSC:
26A33; 34A08; 34A37; 34A12
1. Introduction
The subject of the impulsive fractional-order system (IFrOS) has been a research hotspot, and more than 800 articles can be searched on the Web of Science on the topic of impulsive fractional differential equations. For the IFrOS, its equivalent integral equation is an important tool to discuss some properties (such as the existence of solution, numerical solution, stability, and controllability).
However, in the mainstream research of the IFrOS, the fractional derivative in the IFrOS was independently considered from the whole interval or each subinterval respectively, which caused that there appeared two conflicting equivalent integral equations for the same IFrOS (For details, see [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]). Up to now, the two conflicting thoughts regarding the equivalent integral equation of the IFrOS are used to study numerical solution [14,15], oscillation behavior of solution [16,17], solvability [18], stability [19,20,21], asymptotic behavior of solution [22] and the existence of solution [23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]. Moreover, by combining the two previous conflicting thoughts regarding the equivalent integral equation of IFrOS, the third equivalent integral equation of the same IFrOS was presented in [33,34].
However, recently, we found two fractional-order properties of piecewise function to uncover that the above three thoughts about the equivalent integral equation of IFrOS are incorrect. To support our viewpoint, we will give the fractional order properties of piecewise function and restudy the equivalent integral equation of the first IFrOS that was proposed in [35] by
here () denotes the left-sided Caputo fractional derivative of order , , , and ().
Next three conflicting equivalent integral equations of (1) in existing papers will be given. The results in [1,2,3,4,5,6,35] show that the equivalent integral equation of (1) is
or equivalently,
Remark 1.
On the other hand, the results in [7,8,9,10,11,12,13] show that the equivalent integral equation of (1) is
Moreover, the author in [33] thought that the equivalent integral equation of (1) is an integral equation with two arbitrary constants:
We will illuminate that four equations ((2), (3), (5), and (6)) are not the equivalent integral equation of (1) and find the correct equivalent integral equation of (1).
The rest of this paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, some preliminaries are presented. In Section 3, two fractional-order properties of piecewise function are given. In Section 4, we verify that four equations ((2), (3), (5), and (6)) are not the equivalent integral equation of (1) and search the correct equivalent integral equation of (1) by using the fractional order properties of piecewise function and some limit properties of (1).
2. Preliminaries
We can find the basic definitions and conclusions of fractional calculus in the monographs [36,37,38], and we briefly review several definitions and properties of fractional derivatives in this section.
Definition 1.
Let (). The left-sided Riemann–Liouville fractional integral () is defined as
Definition 2.
The left-sided Riemann–Liouville fractional derivative ( and ) is defined as
Definition 3.
Let . The left-sided Caputo fractional derivative ( and ) is defined by
Lemma 1.
If or , then the initial value problem
is equivalent to the following nonlinear Volterra integral equation of the second kind,
3. Two Fractional Order Properties of Piecewise Function
For the piecewise function
its fractional derivative and fractional integral have respectively two expressions.
Property 1.
Property 2.
Let and (), then the left-sided Riemann–Liouville fractional integral of (9) can be expressed by
and
4. The Equivalent Integral Equation of (1)
4.1. Some Defects in These Equivalent Integral Equations ((2), (3), (5), and (6))
In this subsection, we will verify that four equations ((2), (3), (5), and (6)) are not the equivalent integral equation of (1). We use (10) to compute the fractional derivative of (2):
Therefore, (2) does not satisfy the condition of the fractional derivative of (1). Moreover, with similarity to computation of (18), both of (3) and (6) do not satisfy the condition of the fractional derivative of (1). Thus, none of (2), (3), and (6) is the equivalent integral equation of (1).
Moreover, it is obvious that (5) satisfies the condition of the fractional derivative of (1) and the fractional derivative of (5) is
Next, we will show that (5) is not the unique piecewise function to satisfy the condition of the fractional derivative in (1) and illuminate that (5) is not the equivalent integral solution of (1).
By using (2) and Properties 1 and 2, we can reconstruct a new piecewise function:
In addition, we compute the fractional derivative of (20):
Therefore, both (5) and (20) satisfy these conditions (including fractional derivative, impulses, and initial value) in (1).
4.2. The Correct Equivalent Integral Equation of (1)
In this subsection, we will use Properties 1 and 2 and (16) and (17) to search for the correct equivalent integral equation of (1) and give the equivalent integral equations of (14) and (15).
Define the space of function
Theorem 1.
Let ξ and η be two arbitrary constants, and let function satisfy
where L and M are two positive constants.
Let , then satisfies (1) iff satisfies
Remark 2.
Proof.
‘Sufficiency’. Because of
the fractional derivative of (23) satisfies
Thus, (23) satisfies the condition of the fractional derivative in (1). Moreover, the first order derivative of (23) is
Therefore, it easily verify that (23) satisfies , , and () and these limit properties (14)–(17). Then (23) satisfies all conditions of (1).
’Necessity’. For , consider the special case of (1):
Next, we search the solution of (29). When , the solution of (29) satisfies
with and . Then, we use Properties 1 and 2 to construct the approximate solution of (29):
with the error , here represents the exact solution of (29).
Consider the special case of :
and assume
where is an undetermined function with . Thus, by (31) and (33), the solution of (29) is
Because (29) is the special case of (1), (34) is a part of the solution of (1). Moreover, the limit property (17) shows the linear additivity of the impulsive effects in (1). Thus, we combine (34) and the particular solution (5) to obtain the solution of (1):
Corollary 1.
Let ξ be an arbitrary constant, and let function satisfy
where L and M are two positive constants.
Let , then satisfies (14) iff satisfies
Remark 3.(38) can be rewritten as
Corollary 2.
Let η be an arbitrary constant, and let function satisfy
where L and M are two positive constants.
Let , then satisfies (15) iff satisfies
Remark 4.(40) can be rewritten as
5. Applications
In this section, we use Theorem 1 to consider the equivalent integral equation of an IFrOS and draw three solution trajectories of the IFrOS by the numerical simulation to show the non-uniqueness of the solution of the IFrOS.
Example 1.
Consider the following IFrOS
By (45) and (46), (44) satisfies the condition of the fractional derivative, the impulsive conditions, and the initial value in (42), that is, (44) is the general solution of (42). Moreover, three curves of solution of (42) in Figure 1 are drawn by using equation (43) with , respectively, and the numerical algorithm is with the step size .
Figure 1.
Three solution trajectories of (42).
6. Conclusions
We find that the fractional derivative and the fractional integral of the piecewise function have two different expressions, respectively, and then we use the fractional order properties of the piecewise function to verify that four equations ((2), (3), (5), and (6)) are not the equivalent integral equation of (1). Next, we combine the fractional order properties of piecewise function, some limit properties, the particular solution (5), and the linear additivity of the impulsive effects in (1) to find that the correct equivalent integral equation of (1) is a combination of two functions ( and ) with two arbitrary constants to uncover the non-uniqueness of the solution of (1).
Author Contributions
Methodology, X.Z. and Z.L.; Validation, X.Z., Z.L. and S.Y.; Formal analysis, X.Z., S.Y., Z.P., Y.H. and L.W.; Data curation, X.Z., Z.L. and S.Y.; Writing—original draft, X.Z., Z.P. and L.W.; Writing—review & editing, Z.L., S.Y. and Y.H.; Supervision, X.Z. and Z.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
The work described in this paper is financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 21636004, 22078030), and the Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing (No. CSTB2022NSCQ-MSX1133).
Data Availability Statement
All data are available in this paper.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
- Agarwal, R.; Hristova, S.; O’Regan, D. A survey of Lyapunov functions, stability and impulsive Caputo fractional differential equations. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 2016, 19, 290–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ahmad, B.; Sivasundaram, S. Existence results for nonlinear impulsive hybrid boundary value problems involving fractional differential equations. Nonlinear Anal. Hybrid Syst. 2009, 3, 251–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wang, G.; Ahmad, B.; Zhang, L.; Nieto, J.J. Comments on the concept of existence of solution for impulsive fractional differential equations. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 2014, 19, 401–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Benchohra, M.; Hamani, S. The method of upper and lower solutions and impulsive fractional differential inclusions. Nonlinear Anal. Hybrid Syst. 2009, 3, 433–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Benchohra, M.; Berhoun, F. Impulsive fractional differential equations with variable times. Comput. Math. Appl. 2010, 59, 1245–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Abbas, S.; Benchohra, M. Upper and lower solutions method for impulsive partial hyperbolic differential equations with fractional order. Nonlinear Anal. Hybrid Syst. 2010, 4, 406–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wang, J.R.; Li, X.; Wei, W. On the natural solution of an impulsive fractional differential equation of order q∈(1,2). Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 2012, 17, 4384–4394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wang, J.R.; Zhou, Y.; Feckan, M. On recent developments in the theory of boundary value problems for impulsive fractional differential equations. Comput. Math. Appl. 2012, 64, 3008–3020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Liu, Y. On piecewise continuous solutions of higher order impulsive fractional differential equations and applications. Appl. Math. Comput. 2016, 287–288, 38–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Liu, Y. Survey and new results on boundary-value problems of singular fractional differential equations with impulse effects. Electron. J. Differ. Equ. 2016, 2016, 1–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Feckan, M.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, J.R. On the concept and existence of solution for impulsive fractional differential equations. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 2012, 17, 3050–3060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Feckan, M.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, J.R. Response to “Comments on the concept of existence of solution for impulsive fractional differential equations [Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 2014;19:401-3.]”. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 2014, 19, 4213–4215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wang, J.R.; Fekan, M.; Zhou, Y. A survey on impulsive fractional differential equations. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 2016, 19, 806–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhou, J.W.; Deng, Y.M.; Wang, Y.N. Variational approach to p-Laplacian fractional differential equations with instantaneous and non-instantaneous impulses. Appl. Math. Lett. 2020, 104, 106251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Cao, J.Y.; Chen, L.Z.; Wang, Z.Q. A block-by-block method for the impulsive fractional ordinary differential equations. J. Appl. Anal. Comput. 2020, 10, 853–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Feng, L.M.; Han, Z.L. Oscillation behavior of solution of impulsive fractional differential equation. J. Appl. Anal. Comput. 2020, 10, 223–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Feng, L.M.; Sun, Y.B.; Han, Z.L. Philos-type oscillation criteria for impulsive fractional differential equations. J. Appl. Math. Comput. 2020, 62, 361–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Xu, M.R.; Sun, S.R.; Han, Z.L. Solvability for impulsive fractional Langevin equaiton. J. Appl. Anal. Comput. 2020, 10, 486–494. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, J.K.; Xu, W. An averaging result for impulsive fractional neutral stochastic differential equations. Appl. Math. Lett. 2021, 114, 106892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kucche, K.D.; Kharade, J.P. Analysis of impulsive ϕ-Hilfer fractional differential equations. Mediterr. J. Math. 2020, 17, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhang, T.W.; Xiong, L.L. Periodic motion for impulsive fractional functional differential equations with piecewise Caputo derivative. Appl. Math. Lett. 2020, 2020, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Cheng, L.J.; Hu, L.Y.; Ren, Y. Perturbed impulsive neutral stochastic functional differential equations. Qual. Theory Dyn. Syst. 2021, 20, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Heidarkhani, S.; Salari, A. Nontrivial solutions for impulsive fractional differential systems through variational methods. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 2020, 43, 6529–6541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gou, H.D.; Li, Y.X. The method of lower and upper solutions for impulsive fractional evolution equations. Ann. Funct. Anal. 2020, 11, 350–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- You, J.; Sun, S.R. On impulsive coupled hybrid fractional differential systems in Banach algebras. J. Appl. Math. Comput. 2020, 62, 189–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gou, H.D.; Li, Y.X. A study on impulsive fractional hybrid evolution equations using sequence method. Comput. Appl. Math. 2020, 39, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ravichandran, C.; Logeswari, K.; Panda, S.K.; Nisar, K.S. On new approach of fractional derivative by Mittag-Leffler kernel to neutral integro-differential systems with impulsive conditions. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2020, 139, 110012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Min, D.D.; Chen, F.Q. Existence of solutions for a fractional advection-dispersion equation with impulsive effects via variational approach. J. Appl. Anal. Comput. 2020, 10, 1005–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gou, H.D.; Li, Y.X. A study on impulsive Hilfer fractional evolution equations with nonlocal conditions. Int. J. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 2020, 21, 205–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gou, H.D.; Li, Y.X. The method of lower and upper solutions for impulsive fractional evolution equations in Banach spaces. J. Korean Math. Soc. 2020, 57, 61–88. [Google Scholar]
- Agarwal, R.P.; Hristova, S.; O’Regan, D. Exact solutions of linear Riemann-Liouville fractional differential equations with impulses. Rocky Mt. J. Math. 2020, 50, 779–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kucche, K.D.; Kharade, J.P.; Sousa, J.V.D.C. On the nonlinear impulsive Ψ-Hilfer fractional differential equations. Math. Model. Anal. 2020, 25, 642–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhang, X. On the concept of general solution for impulsive differential equations of fractional-order q∈(1,2). Appl. Math. Comput. 2015, 268, 103–120. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, X.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, M. On the concept of general solution for impulsive differential equations of fractional order q∈(0,1). Appl. Math. Comput. 2014, 247, 72–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Agarwal, R.P.; Benchohra, M.; Slimani, B.A. Existence results for differential equations with fractional order and impulses. Mem. Differ. Equ. Math. Phys. 2008, 44, 1–21. [Google Scholar]
- Podlubny, I. Fractional Differential Equations; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Kilbas, A.A.; Srivastava, H.M.; Trujillo, J.J. Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Baleanu, D.; Diethelm, K.; Scalas, E.; Trujillo, J.J. Fractional Calculus Models and Numerical Methods, Series on Complexity, Nonlinearity and Chaos; World Scientific: Singapore, 2012. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
