Error in Figures
In the original publication [], there were mistakes in Figures 6 and 7. We do apologize that Figures 6 and 7 were mistakes of duplicate images. We have corrected Figures 6 and 7. The corrected Figure 6 and Figure 7 appear below. The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.
Figure 6.
(a) HUVECs transwell assay of EL, ELI, and ELID (the scale bar = 400 μm); (b) HUVECs migration number of fields for EL, ELI, and ELID (PBS as blank and n = 4, * indicates p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 7.
(a) The tube formation assay of EL, ELI, and ELID (the scale bar = 400 μm); (b) the total tube length of EL, ELI, and ELID (PBS as blank and n = 4, * means p ≤ 0.05).
Reference
- Sheng, C.; Tan, X.; Huang, Q.; Li, K.; Zhou, C.; Guo, M. Antibacterial and Angiogenic Poly(ionic liquid) Hydrogels. Gels 2022, 8, 476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).