Next Article in Journal
Overview of Mucormycosis Cases in Türkiye: A Cumulative Case Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
In Vitro Evaluation of Olorofim and Amphotericin B Combination Therapy Against Talaromyces marneffei
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Different Signal Peptides on the Expression of Glucoamylase from Aspergillus awamori in the Filamentous Fungus Penicillium verruculosum
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Machine-Learning Prediction of Extracellular Vesicle Protein Sorting Expands the Characterization of Secretory Functions in Mucor circinelloides

by
João Neves-da-Rocha
1,2,*,
Marcos E. R. Lopes
2,
Lucas F. Nogueira
1,
Shaghayegh Moghadam
1,
Felipe E. A. De Paiva
1 and
Fausto Almeida
1,*
1
Department of Biochemistry and Immunology, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14049-900, SP, Brazil
2
Department of Genetics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14049-900, SP, Brazil
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2026, 12(6), 442; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof12060442
Submission received: 18 April 2026 / Revised: 14 June 2026 / Accepted: 16 June 2026 / Published: 17 June 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fungal Cell Biology)

Abstract

Opportunistic infections are a growing concern in medical mycology. In that context, Mucor circinelloides is recognized as an etiological agent of emerging life-threatening infections in humans. Furthermore, this biomass-degrading species is important in the biotechnological context due to its potential for enzyme discovery. In this work, we describe an in silico pipeline for the comprehensive characterization of the secretome of this species. Our analyses suggest that M. circinelloides encodes a diverse enzymatic repertoire, including multiple carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes). Functional characterization of this secreted protein set identified candidate proteins with potential relevance for industrial application and virulence-related processes. Importantly, we extended this framework by integrating a sequence-based machine-learning (ML) approach for the prediction of extracellular vesicle (EV)-associated proteins. Using a Random Forest model trained on high-confidence EV datasets, we predicted a subset of candidate proteins in M. circinelloides and explored their functional distribution. The predicted EV proteome displayed a degree of similarity to experimentally characterized human EV proteomes, suggesting that the model is able to capture sequence-derived predictive signals. Overall, our results support the potential of ML as a scalable strategy to be integrated into the study of fungal EVs. This approach provided a foundation for research aimed at experimentally validating EV cargo and refining predictive models. Beyond M. circinelloides, we provide a framework that may be useful for future studies on EV biology across diverse fungi of medical and biotechnological interest.

1. Introduction

Saprophytic fungal species play a key role in nutrient cycling and organic matter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems, adding to the function of bacteria in forest and agricultural soils [1,2]. Among these fungi, species from the order Mucorales are recognized as important decomposers of complex organic substrates [3]. Mucorales are an early-diverging clade belonging to the phylum Mucoromycota and are phylogenetically distinct from both Ascomycota and Basidiomycota. Consequently, Mucorales are evolutionarily distant from Dikarya species, forming a basal lineage that retains several ancestral features such as coenocytic hyphae, zygospores, and chitosan-rich cell walls [4,5,6,7,8]. From a metabolic point of view, these species also exhibit fast hyphal extension rates associated with strong reliance on rapidly absorbed nutrient sources and a simpler genome architecture/regulation [9,10,11,12,13]. Mucor circinelloides is particularly noteworthy for its dual relevance as an emerging opportunistic pathogen and a cellular platform for biotechnological applications [14,15].
As the etiological agent of mucormycosis, M. circinelloides is associated with significant clinical risk, especially to immunocompromised patients, with mortality rates reaching 67% in individuals with decompensated diabetes mellitus [16,17,18,19]. As a particular clinical aspect of opportunistic mucormycotic infections, acquired resistance has been reported as an adaptive trend associated with epigenetic mechanisms, which include siRNA-dependent epimutations that confer resistance to antifungal treatments in vivo [20,21]. Virulence attributes are directly linked to dimorphic transitions in this species [22,23], and comparative genomic studies contrasting virulent to avirulent isolates revealed 773 genes that are either truncated, discontiguous, or completely absent in the NRRL3631 avirulent strain [9]. Genes potentially associated with virulence traits in M. circinelloides were enriched in functions such as protein maturation, post-translational modifications (PTMs), transport, vesicle formation, secretory pathway sorting, and also included many enzymes involved in the biogenesis of extracellular structures [24]. These observations indicate that surface and secreted functions can be particularly relevant to pathogenicity and host interaction in mucormycoses.
In eukaryotes, a major secretion mechanism canonically synthesizes proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and further directs them for post-translational processing in the Golgi apparatus. Protein sorting into the ER occurs co-translationally and depends on the presence of a signal peptide in the N-terminal region of the translating protein [25,26]. Such signal peptides are known as Sec/SPI, referring to proteins that enter the classical secretory pathway and are cleaved by Signal Peptidase I after translocation into the ER [27,28]. Proteins undergo chaperone-assisted folding and initial modifications in the ER, while final maturation, including carbohydrate modifications, occurs in the Golgi. After maturation, Sec/SPI proteins are incorporated into the cell membrane or secreted to the extracellular medium by exocytosis [29,30,31,32,33,34]. While the ER-Golgi secretory pathway remains a leading export system in eukaryotic cells, organisms also rely on noncanonical strategies to deliver extracellular biomolecules.
Extracellular vesicles (EVs), in particular, emerge as important secreted structures that carry not only proteins as their cargo, but are also filled with lipids, polysaccharides, and RNAs [35,36]. The biogenesis of EVs has been reported to occur either through ESCRT or ceramide-dependent formation of intraluminal vesicles within multivesicular bodies [37,38,39,40,41]. Protein sorting into EVs, however, remains an incompletely understood process that is thought to occur through ubiquitination, lipid microdomain association, and specific PTMs, rather than canonical signal peptides [38,41,42,43,44,45,46]. The lack of conserved sequence-encoded determinants for EV protein sorting makes it more complex to determine whether putative extracellular proteins lacking classical Sec/SPI signals might be carried and delivered through these structures [47]. Therefore, studies focused on determining EV cargo almost exclusively rely on direct and sensitive experimental methods for biomolecule identification, such as mass spectrometry-based proteomics, RNA sequencing, and lipidomic analyses of purified vesicles. Limitations to these techniques include the requirement for highly purified vesicle preparations, the typically low amount of material recovered from EV isolations, the potential co-isolation of endogenous contaminants, and the fact that experimental detection is often condition-dependent, which may prevent the comprehensive identification of EV-associated molecules across different biological contexts [48,49,50,51,52,53]. Yet, a detailed characterization of EV-associated proteins is critical for a mechanistic interpretation of the functions and molecular organization of these secreted structures.
In fungi, EVs have emerged as critical elements for understanding key aspects of their biology. By transporting diverse cargo, these structures participate in processes such as stress response, intercellular communication, epithelial adhesion, and host–pathogen interactions [50,54,55,56,57,58,59,60]. EVs also play a direct role in modulating the host immune response, and advances in understanding EV structure and cargo have driven the development of vaccines, antifungal therapies, and diagnostic biomarkers [61,62,63,64]. Nevertheless, proteomic characterization of EV cargo remains challenging and demanding, which limits our comprehension of EV function in high-priority processes such as cell communication and infection. Therefore, computational prediction approaches constitute a valuable strategy for the large-scale characterization of EV-associated proteins in fungal genomes. Ongoing advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have contributed to the in silico characterization of EV cargo and biomarkers [65,66,67,68,69,70]. Using established databases on proteins isolated from human EVs, a seminal study has demonstrated that computational prediction of EV-associated proteins is possible through sequence-based strategies [47]. Redirecting this approach to fungal species might contribute to our fundamental understanding of the secretome repertoire of diverse fungi, filling an important gap in the molecular and medical mycology literature.
In this work, we performed a comprehensive characterization of the secretome of M. circinelloides. This characterization was achieved using a sequential pipeline integrating multiple tools for the detection of Sec/SPI signal peptides, protein subcellular localization, and transmembrane topology. A rich secretory repertoire of carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes) was identified in the dataset and provided meaningful insights into the ability of this species to degrade plant biomass and remodel cell structure during infection. In parallel, candidate EV-associated proteins were identified by a multicriteria Random Forest ML strategy that combined 76 sequence-based protein features (physicochemical, structural, and PTM features) associated with vesicle sorting. Predicted EV proteins displayed a functional profile consistent with experimentally validated human EV proteins. Together, these analyses provided a global view of the secretome of M. circinelloides and established a cutting-edge strategy for the prediction and large-scale characterization of EV cargo proteins in fungi.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Identification of Sec-Dependent Secreted Proteins

The complete proteome of M. circinelloides strain 1006PhL was retrieved from the Ensembl Fungi database [71] and screened for the occurrence of N-terminal signal peptides using SignalP v6.0 [28], employing the prediction model for eukaryotic organisms. All proteins containing a classical cleavable signal peptide consisting of a defined sequence that directs proteins to the ER via the Sec translocation pathway were retained. These Sec/SPI-positive proteins were then analyzed using the software DeepTMHMM v1.0 with default settings [72] to determine the number and position of transmembrane helices (TMHs). In the resulting dataset, all proteins containing TMHs were removed from the secretome dataset since they represent integral membrane proteins. Proteins with a single predicted TMH were maintained as part of the secretome only when helix position and topology were restricted to the protein N-terminal region corresponding to the signal peptide.

2.2. Functional Annotation of Carbohydrate-Active Enzymes

CAZyme candidates were identified through complementary sequence similarity and profile-based approaches. First, Hidden Markov Model (HMM) searches were conducted using HMMer [73,74] against the dbCAN3 HMM [75], which contains curated domain profiles representative of CAZyme families. In parallel, sequence similarity searches were performed using DIAMOND [76,77] against the CAZy database (http://www.cazy.org (accessed on 24 March 2026)) to detect homologous proteins with previously annotated CAZyme functions. The results obtained from both approaches were integrated into a single dataset without excluding predictions supported by only one method. For each protein candidate, the type and number of supporting tools were explicitly recorded to indicate the level of annotation support. Proteins identified by both HMMer/dbCAN and DIAMOND/CAZy searches are considered high-confidence CAZyme predictions. Finally, the functional classification of the predicted CAZymes into their respective classes and families was assigned according to the annotations provided in the CAZy database.

2.3. Identification of Sec-Independent Secreted Proteins

Non-classical protein secretion was assessed through a sequential multi-tool pipeline. Initially, the proteome of M. circinelloides was analyzed with DeepLoc v2.1 using default settings [78], a deep learning-based predictor of subcellular localization, and proteins predicted as extracellular were selected as primary candidates. To ensure exclusion of proteins following the canonical ER-Golgi secretory route, the initial extracellular set was further filtered by removing all proteins predicted by SignalP v6.0 [28] to contain N-terminal signal peptides, thereby restricting the dataset to extracellular proteins lacking classical secretion signals. The resulting candidates were subsequently analyzed with DeepTMHMM v1.0 [72] to exclude proteins containing any TMH. To further validate Sec-independent secretion, the filtered candidates were analyzed with SecretomeP v2.0 using default settings [79], an ML model for ab initio predictions of non-classical protein secretion, using a threshold of neural network (NN) score ≥ 0.5. Proteins flagged by SecretomeP as containing signal peptides were excluded regardless of their NN score. Proteins consistently supported by DeepLoc, DeepTMHMM, and SecretomeP were considered high-confidence candidates for non-classical secretion, while partially supported candidates were retained for exploratory analyses.

2.4. Machine-Learning Prediction of EV Cargo Proteins

ML-based prediction of EV protein cargo was conducted following a previously established workflow using sequence-based protein features [47]. In this approach, a supervised classification model was trained on a curated human protein dataset containing 5965 and 10,290 EV- and non-EV proteins, respectively. The underlying rationale of this methodology is that EV protein sorting is influenced by intrinsic physicochemical and structural properties encoded at the protein sequence level, which can be learned by AI models and generalized across eukaryotic systems. Feature generation followed a comprehensive and standardized bioinformatics pipeline integrating multiple layers of sequence-derived information. Primary sequence features included amino acid composition normalized by protein length, global physicochemical descriptors such as molecular weight, aromaticity, instability index, grand average of hydropathy (GRAVY), isoelectric point, and net charge at different pH values. Structural and biophysical features were incorporated from predictions generated by NetSurfP v3.0 [80], including secondary structure elements, relative surface accessibility, and disorder propensity, which collectively capture folding state and surface exposure patterns relevant to protein sorting. Membrane association and topology were inferred using DeepTMHMM v1.0 [72], allowing for discrimination between soluble and membrane-embedded proteins. PTM features were derived from predictions generated by MusiteDeep [81], a deep learning-based model, and included major PTM classes such as phosphorylation, glycosylation, ubiquitination, acetylation, methylation, and lipid-related modifications. All protein features were generated using the same scripts, tools, and settings from the original training dataset [47]. The resulting test dataset, containing 76 features, was systematically normalized and transformed to ensure compatibility with the original training distribution, preserving the statistical properties required for model generalization. The ML model consisted of a Random Forest classifier implemented in scikit-learn, which leverages an ensemble of decision trees to capture non-linear relationships between features [47]. This algorithm provides robustness to feature heterogeneity, resistance to overfitting, and the ability to model complex interactions. The trained model was subsequently applied to the complete proteome of M. circinelloides to generate probabilistic predictions of EV cargo, enabling large-scale prediction of potential EV-associated proteins.

2.5. Orthology and Functional Validation of Machine-Learning Predictions

To evaluate ML predictions, we performed a functional analysis of the top 5% highest-scoring EV-associated candidate proteins in M. circinelloides (n = 663), which were annotated and classified into biological categories based on homology searches [82] and their subcellular localization [78]. The resulting functional and localization profiles were compared to those obtained from a curated dataset of 2649 high-confidence human EV proteins previously compiled from studies employing high-purity EV isolation methods and mass spectrometry [47]. Comparative analyses allowed us to assess whether sequence-based ML predictions recapitulated major biological features from experimentally validated EV proteomes. As an independent quantitative approach, an orthology-based analysis was performed using experimentally characterized EV proteins from the ascomycete species Histoplasma capsulatum [83]. Initially, the 5% highest-scoring proteins predicted as EV-associated in M. circinelloides were compared against a dataset of 1110 proteins previously identified in EVs of H. capsulatum by proteomic analyses (EVpedia accession number 273037290101). Orthologous relationships were inferred using OrthoFinder v3.1.2 [84]. The number of proteome-wide and EV-associated proteins in M. circinelloides exhibiting orthologous relationships with the H. capsulatum EV dataset was quantified to assess the expected orthology occurrence in a sample size of n = 663 under a null model. Empirical statistical significance was assessed through a permutation test in which 100,000 random samples of 663 proteins were drawn from the complete M. circinelloides proteome. The resulting null distribution was combined with hypergeometric testing to evaluate significance, providing a statistical validation of the predictive capacity of the ML model.

3. Results

3.1. Global Characterization of the Sec-Dependent Secretome of Mucor circinelloides

To characterize the repertoire of secreted proteins of M. circinelloides, we initially focused on the identification of proteins that enter the classical ER-Golgi secretory pathway. The complete proteome of M. circinelloides strain 1006PhL was screened for the presence of N-terminal Sec/SPI signal peptides using the deep learning-based tool SignalP v6.0. This analysis indicated a total of 748 Sec/SPI-positive proteins, which were subsequently filtered using DeepTMHMM to exclude proteins containing transmembrane helices. A subset of 548 secreted proteins was identified as the core classical secretome, while 200 proteins were classified as integral membrane components (Figure 1A). Stepwise results and the complete list of proteins identified in this analysis are provided in Supplementary Material Table S1.
Functional annotation of Sec/SPI-positive proteins suggested that the classical secretome may be enriched in carbohydrate-active functions and proteases. Beyond these major classes, the ER–Golgi secretome also included proteins associated with lipid metabolism, adhesion, redox processes, chaperone activity, and LysM domain-containing proteins (Figure 1B). Concerning the set of secreted proteases, this class was dominated by aspartic proteases, followed by serine proteases and a small subset of metalloproteases (Figure 1C). The subset of serine proteases was dominated by subtilisin-like enzymes (Figure 1D), which are critical in the context of animal host-tissue invasion.
Notably, a substantial fraction of the identified proteins lacked detectable homology to characterized entries in the InterPro database, which may reflect species-specific or uncharacterized functions. In parallel, multiple proteins were annotated only at the feature level and displayed intrinsically disordered signatures (Figure 1B). Proteins categorized as non-core functional classes were also mostly annotated at the feature level and thus correspond to partially characterized domains and families. Overall, the high proportion of hypothetical and incompletely characterized proteins in the secretome of M. circinelloides likely reflects its status as a non-model species while also supporting potentially novel functions and biotechnological applications.

3.2. Mucor circinelloides Secretes an Enzymatic Repertoire Enriched in CAZymes with Potential Biotechnological Applications

Given the high prevalence of CAZymes in the dataset of secreted proteins and their known relevance to processes related to host interaction and plant biomass degradation, we performed a comprehensive characterization of this class of enzymes. Validated annotations were achieved using homology-based HMMER searches against the dbCAN HMM database and DIAMOND searches against the CAZy sequence database. Results from both tools were integrated without excluding single-tool predictions, and the level of support for each protein was explicitly recorded (Supplementary Material Table S2). The resulting set of CAZymes was categorized into six major classes according to the classification scheme provided by the CAZy database.
A total of 119 Sec/SPI-positive CAZymes were identified in the genome of M. circinelloides. CAZy categorization included all six major enzyme classes. Glycoside Hydrolases (GH) formed the most abundant CAZy class, followed by Carbohydrate Esterases (CE), Carbohydrate-Binding Modules (CBM), Glycosyltransferases (GT), Auxiliary Activities (AA), and Polysaccharide Lyases (PL) (Figure 2A). GHs also formed the most diverse CAZy class in the number of representative families. Among these, GH18, GH3, GH16, GH152, and GH15 had a prominent representation in the dataset. Nonetheless, the single most abundant CAZy family among Sec/SPI-positive CAZymes was CE4 (Figure 2B). The distribution of CBMs was restricted to the GH18, GH15, and GH45 families, contributing to substrate ligation and specificity of these enzymes. CBMs were also found in CAZymes with unassigned classes (Supplementary Material Table S2).
Functional annotation of CAZy families suggested a marked predominance of enzymes involved in cell wall remodeling and plant polysaccharide degradation in M. circinelloides, followed by functions related to glycan biosynthesis, CBM-mediated substrate targeting, and auxiliary oxidative activities (Table 1). This functional distribution is consistent with a saprophytic lifestyle, supporting the ability to utilize complex plant-derived substrates while also reflecting cell wall dynamics that may be critical for pathogenic attributes of this species. As an overview, this analysis supported the identification of specific proteins with potential relevance in biotechnological and medical contexts (see Discussion). To further explore their structural properties, we performed AlphaFold-based predictions for representative CAZymes across all six major classes. The resulting models displayed highly confident and well-defined structures, as indicated by low Predicted Aligned Error (PAE) values and consistent folding patterns (Figure S1).

3.3. Characterization of Sec-Independent Extracellular Proteins

We further evaluated protein subcellular localization to identify extracellular proteins that are secreted in a Sec-independent manner. This strategy consisted of a sequential multi-tool pipeline. An initial set of 38 extracellular Sec/SPI-negative proteins was identified using SignalP filtering and DeepLoc, a deep learning-based predictor of subcellular localization. This set corresponded to predicted extracellular proteins that lacked classical signal peptides, indicating their secretion through non-classical pathways. To exclude membrane-associated proteins, a second filter was applied using DeepTMHMM, resulting in a final set of 30 extracellular Sec/SPI-negative proteins (Figure 3A). The dataset was also analyzed using SecretomeP, which confirmed that 20 of these proteins had a moderate non-classical secretion signature (Table A1).
Functional annotation suggested that a large fraction of the dataset lacked characterized functional orthologs, including many SecretomeP high-scoring proteins. Additionally, several proteins containing disordered signatures were also reported. Functional categories included four proteases, three GH CAZymes (GH16, GH18, and GH46), two lipid-associated proteins, one phosphoesterase, and one LysM domain-containing protein (Figure 3B). The complete multi-tool sequential results produced in this analysis are available in Supplementary Material Table S3.
The six proteins predicted to contain disordered regions were structurally analyzed in IUPred3 and AlphaFold (Figure S2). Overall, these proteins exhibited extensive disorder, with large portions of their sequences yielding low-confidence structural models, as supported by low pLDDT scores and high PAE values, consistent with intrinsically disordered behavior. Notably, EPB81863 displayed a partially structured region containing well-defined α-helices and β-sheets, suggesting the presence of a potential functional core. EPB82347 showed a small region with secondary elements (α-helices and β-sheets), although with limited confidence. EPB82275 was predicted to be entirely intrinsically disordered, forming a large protein lacking stable tertiary structure. Similarly, EPB7963 and EPB92248 corresponded to smaller proteins that were almost entirely disordered. In contrast, EPB87092 produced a large and very complex structure, but with uniformly low confidence scores, indicating a flexible and unresolved conformation (Figure S2).

3.4. Machine-Learning Prediction of EV Cargo Proteins

To explore the feasibility of predicting EV-associated proteins in fungi using sequence-based features, we applied a previously established ML model [47] to the proteome of M. circinelloides. This analysis was designed as an exploratory approach to evaluate whether a methodology originally trained on human data could capture biologically meaningful signals in fungi, thereby addressing a major unresolved challenge in the field: the lack of reliable predictors for EV-associated proteins. Random Forest model performance, as assessed on the original human validation dataset, showed moderate discriminative performance. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (Figure 4A) yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.766, indicating that the model can effectively distinguish EV-associated from non-EV proteins. Consistently, the normalized confusion matrix (Figure 4B) suggested a satisfactory classification performance, with true positive and true negative rates of 0.7, and corresponding false positive and false negative rates of 0.3. This balanced behavior was further supported by class-wise metrics, with precision values of 0.700 and 0.702, recall values of 0.704 and 0.698, and F1-scores of 0.702 and 0.700 for non-EV (class 0) and EV-associated proteins (class 1), respectively. These results suggest that the model captures generalizable sequence-level features associated with EV targeting.
We next applied the Random Forest model to the proteome of M. circinelloides to obtain EV prediction scores (Figure 4C). Across the analyzed proteome (n = 12,227 proteins), EV scores ranged from 0.42 to 0.579, with a mean of 0.51 and a standard deviation of 0.023. The interquartile range was similarly restricted (Q1 = 0.492; median = 0.509; Q3 = 0.526), indicating a high concentration of predictions within a limited score interval. Based on this distribution, a percentile-based thresholding strategy was adopted to prioritize high-confidence EV candidates. We highlighted the top 5% of proteins according to their EV scores for the identification of the most probable EV-associated proteins while avoiding arbitrary cutoffs near the central tendency of the distribution. We decided to adopt a conservative approach for candidate selection since the distinction between EV and non-EV proteins was gradual rather than discrete, based on the features analyzed. The complete test dataset consisting of 76 protein features assigned to the proteome of M. circinelloides is available in Supplementary Material Table S4.

3.5. Comparative Genomics and Functional Annotation Support Machine-Learning Predicted EV Cargo

To gain insight into the biological composition of the predicted EV-associated proteome, we functionally annotated the top 5% highest-scoring candidates in M. circinelloides (n = 663) and compared their profiles with a curated dataset of 2649 high-confidence human EV proteins from the original training dataset [47] (Supplementary Material Table S5). This comparative framework was used to assess whether sequence-based ML predictions recapitulate known features of experimentally validated EV proteomes.
Functional classification of the fungal EV candidates suggested a partial predominance of proteins involved in central metabolic and biosynthetic processes (n = 306), followed by proteins of varied or general function (other, n = 145), along with categories such as translation (n = 42), nucleotide metabolism (n = 36), proteostasis (n = 24), and proteases (n = 23). Additional categories included stress response, CAZymes, RNA metabolism, vesicle trafficking, signaling kinases, transport, lipid-related, and cell wall (Figure 5A). Interestingly, EV protein candidates included a reduced number of uncharacterized and intrinsically disordered proteins (Supplementary Material Table S4). An in-depth analysis of the dominating metabolic category further indicated a composition enriched in redox-related enzymes (n = 98) and general metabolic enzymes (n = 91), followed by proteins involved in energy metabolism (n = 41), carbohydrate metabolism (n = 29), hydrolase activity (n = 27), and methylation processes (n = 20) (Figure 5B). Subcellular localization predictions indicated a dominant cytoplasmic origin for the fungal EV candidates (61.0%), followed by nuclear-associated proteins (23.5%) and a smaller fraction of mitochondrial proteins (7.2%). Components of the classical secretory pathway, such as endoplasmic reticulum-associated proteins, were comparatively underrepresented (Figure 5C).
To evaluate the congruence between experimentally validated and ML-predicted EV profiles, we compared the functional distribution of fungal proteins to the dataset of human EV proteins characterized by mass spectrometry in studies using high-purity EV isolation methods [47]. As reported for M. circinelloides, human EV proteins also showed a substantial contribution from metabolic functions (n = 489), although the largest category corresponded to proteins grouped as ‘other’ (n = 913), representing a heterogeneous set of proteins associated with either general or highly specialized cellular functions that could not be assigned to major classes. This broader distribution likely reflects both the higher functional diversification of the human proteome and the greater depth of functional annotation available for mammalian proteins (Figure 5D). Vesicle trafficking proteins (n = 447) were more abundant in the human dataset than in fungal predictions, supporting a stronger representation and possibly the better annotation status of EV components in the human proteome. Still, the overall landscape from predicted fungal EV proteins partially recapitulated the functional distribution of experimentally validated EV cargo (Figure 5A,D). Within metabolic subcategories, human EVs similarly displayed a dominance of general enzymes (n = 250) and redox-related proteins (n = 178), with energy metabolism contributing to a lesser extent (n = 61) (Figure 5E). Subcellular localization patterns also showed a consistent overlap between the two datasets, with cytoplasmic proteins contributing to the larger fraction of EV cargo (Figure 5F). Notably, membrane-associated and endomembrane system proteins were more prominent in human EVs. The consistency of the results obtained supports the potential of continued ML advances for the characterization of complex biological processes in fungi, particularly protein sorting into EVs.
As an independent validation strategy combining evolutionary aspects to statistical discrimination, we next investigated whether the EV-associated proteins predicted in M. circinelloides recapitulated experimentally characterized orthologues from the EV proteome of another fungal species. To this end, the top 5% highest-scoring EV candidates (663 proteins) were compared against a dataset of 1110 proteins identified through mass spectrometry in H. capsulatum EVs. Orthology inference revealed a substantial degree of conservation between the two EV datasets (Figure 6A, Supplementary Material Table S6). Among the 1133 orthogroups identified, 281 (24.8%) contained proteins from both species and were classified as shared orthogroups, whereas 84 (7.4%) corresponded to species-specific multigene orthogroups and 768 (67.8%) were represented by singletons lacking detectable orthologues within the datasets. At the protein level, 386 of the 663 predicted EV-associated proteins from M. circinelloides (58.2%) were assigned to orthogroups shared with H. capsulatum, while 78 proteins (11.8%) belonged to species-specific multigene families and 199 proteins (30.0%) lacked detectable orthologues. Similarly, among the experimentally identified EV proteins from H. capsulatum, 411 proteins (37.0%) were associated with shared orthogroups, 130 (11.7%) belonged to species-specific multigene families, and 569 (51.3%) were classified as proteins without detectable orthologues. These results indicate that a substantial fraction of the predicted M. circinelloides EV proteome belongs to evolutionarily conserved protein families found in experimentally characterized fungal EV cargo.
We performed a permutation-based enrichment analysis to determine the statistical significance associated with ML model reliability based on the observed occurrence of orthologues. Considering the proteome size of 12,611 proteins for M. circinelloides and the 1110 proteins identified in H. capsulatum EVs as the reference set, 100,000 random samples of 663 proteins were generated to estimate the null expectation of orthologue occurrence. Estimates were performed based on a total of 3275 proteins in M. circinolloides that share homology with the reference H. capsulatum set (Supplementary Material Table S6). Under this scenario, and assuming a random classifier, only 172.2 proteins were expected on average to exhibit orthology relationships with the H. capsulatum EV dataset (Figure 6B,C). In contrast, the ML predictions yielded 386 orthologous proteins, corresponding to a 2.24-fold enrichment over the random expectation. The null distribution obtained from the permutation analysis was narrowly centered around the expected value, whereas the observed occurrence was located far outside the distribution range, producing an empirical random probability effectively indistinguishable from zero (Figure 6B,C). Consistently, hypergeometric testing indicated that such an overlap is extremely unlikely to occur by chance (p = 5.31 × 10−73), supporting the biological relevance of the predicted EV proteome. These results strongly reject the null hypothesis of a random classifier, demonstrating that the ML model effectively captured sequence-derived features that are truly associated with EV protein sorting in fungi.

4. Discussion

The global emergence of opportunistic pathogens is indicated by the first WHO report dedicated to tests and treatments for fungal diseases, which emphasizes the lack of new antifungals, limitations in diagnosis, and the emergence of resistant strains [85]. In the context of fungal–host interactions, pathogenic species rely on a repertoire of hydrolytic enzymes to invade host tissues [86,87,88]. In addition, secreted proteins participate in structural processes such as cell wall remodeling and extracellular matrix plasticity, which are critical for host interaction and resistance traits [89]. In biotechnology, the characterization of microorganism-derived enzymes is a fundamental step for biomass conversion and optimizing industrial processes [90,91]. At the same time, addressing virulence strategies contributes to our fundamental understanding of pathogens, aiding the development of novel therapeutic approaches against fungal infections [92].
Mucoromycota fungi have adapted to thrive in different environments and developed strategies to infect a wide variety of hosts, ranging from plants to animals [3,8]. M. circinelloides is one of the most common species of the order Mucorales and is also the etiological agent of life-threatening infections to humans. Studies have demonstrated that virulence attributes in this species are associated traits such as rapid growth, spore size dimorphism, and flexible carbon metabolism [9,93,94]. In that context, secreted proteins are particularly important for tissue invasion and overcoming host defenses [95,96,97]. Functional genomic insights into secreted proteins thus provide a global and straightforward view into infection mechanisms and unveil the biotechnological potential of overlooked fungal species. In this work, we implemented a comprehensive workflow for the identification and characterization of the complete set of secreted proteins of the opportunistic pathogen M. circinelloides. Additionally, prediction of EV-associated proteins was achieved using an ML Random Forest model based on protein physicochemical, structural, and PTM features.
Secretory processes rely on dedicated pathways that couple protein synthesis and modification to their extracellular delivery, thereby supporting functions such as nutrient acquisition, tissue adhesion, and biofilm formation [25,29]. Our results suggested that both the classical and non-classical secretomes of M. circinelloides are dominated by carbohydrate-active and proteolytic functions. The set of secreted proteases was dominated by aspartic proteases, followed by serine proteases and a smaller subset of metalloproteases. Aspartic proteases are typically active under acidic conditions and are often implicated in extracellular protein digestion, nutrient acquisition, and the processing of host-derived substrates [98,99]. Serine proteases, in turn, comprise a diverse group of enzymes involved in protein turnover, signaling, and interactions with the host environment [100,101]. Notably, this subset was largely dominated by subtilisin-like enzymes, which are widely recognized for their ability to degrade structural components of animal tissues, such as the extracellular matrix, thereby playing a key role in pathogenicity [12,102]. In contrast, metalloproteases, although less abundant in the results, are known to participate in the degradation of complex protein substrates and contribute to host invasion and virulence through metal ion-dependent catalytic mechanisms [103,104,105].
CAZymes comprised the most abundant class of secreted proteins in M. circinelloides. Several enzyme families, including GH18 (chitinases), GH20 (β-N-acetylhexosaminidases), CE4 (chitin deacetylases), and GH72 (β-1,3-glucanosyltransferases), are involved in fungal cell wall remodeling, contributing to structural maintenance as well as to pathogenic transitions [106,107,108]. In addition, the presence of GH28, which catalyzes the hydrolysis of pectin, a major acidic heteropolysaccharide in the plant primary cell wall and middle lamella, and GH45, involved in cellulose and hemicellulose degradation, supports a saprophytic lifestyle and the ability to exploit complex plant-derived substrates [106,109]. Consistently, plant polysaccharide-degrading activities were also identified in CE16 proteins, primarily known as hemicellulose acetyl esterases. These enzymes are often found in filamentous fungi and are notable for their ability to act on complex, acetylated hemicelluloses, including xylan, galactoglucomannan, and xyloglucan [106,110]. Beyond degradation, several CAZyme families, including GH15, GH31, and GH47, together with glycosyltransferases such as GT1 and GT15, are implicated in glycan metabolism [106,111]. The secretome also harbored AA enzymes, including AA1, AA2, AA3, AA5, and AA12, which are commonly associated with oxidative processes, stress responses, and secondary metabolism [112,113]. Ultimately, the presence of multiple CBMs, such as CBM5, CBM19, CBM20, CBM48, and CBM50, underscores the importance of substrate recognition to enhance enzymatic efficiency within the secretome of this species [114,115].
In fungi, the repertoire of secreted CAZymes determines adaptative features, enabling the degradation of plant biomass and competition for nutrients [116]. Mucoromycota fungi, such as Rhizopus spp., exhibit a distinctive enzymatic profile, with an abundance of the GH18 and CE4 families, involved in fungal cell wall remodeling [11,117]. In M. circinelloides, the expression of carbohydrate transporters and cell wall enzymes is influenced by the environmental conditions [118]. In Mucor lusitanicus, the ability to switch between filamentous (aerobic) and yeast-like (anaerobic) growth is also associated with significant changes in the expression of genes encoding CAZymes [119]. During the transition to anaerobiosis, 12 CAZyme genes are upregulated, including chitin deacetylases (CE4) and chitinases (GH18), while 20 are downregulated, including chitin synthases [119]. These expression changes suggest that the cell wall undergoes active remodeling during morphological transitions, with increased deacetylation of chitin to form chitosan, a more flexible polymer associated with the yeast-like form.
An additional aspect of the secretome of M. circinelloides was the presence of multiple proteins lacking functional annotation or matching orthologs of known function. This aspect indicates the potential of basal fungal species in harboring proteins that are currently uncharacterized, which might play important functions in the medical or biotechnological contexts. Notably, a large fraction of these proteins exhibited intrinsically disordered sequence signatures. Indeed, studying the function of intrinsically disordered proteins can be a challenging task and requires deeper insights about their conformational dynamics. According to the DisProt database, intrinsically disordered proteins perform a wide range of biological functions that arise either from their flexible, unstructured state or from disorder-to-order transitions upon binding [120,121]. These proteins are frequently involved in protein–protein and protein–DNA interactions, acting as hubs in molecular recognition and signaling. Their structural plasticity also supports roles as flexible linkers or entropic spacers, facilitating domain movement and macromolecular assembly. Additionally, disordered proteins often contribute to regulatory processes such as phosphorylation and acetylation. Other functions include chaperone-like activity, metal ion binding and detoxification, polymerization, and substrate recognition [120,121]. Continued efforts are required to unveil the range of functionality of these proteins in the secretome of M. circinelloides.
Research into fungal EVs has proven to be a cutting-edge strategy for investigating mechanisms of cell communication, environmental adaptation, and virulence in these organisms. EVs are known to act as transport vehicles for biomolecules, including proteins, lipids, polysaccharides, and RNAs, capable of modulating the fungal microenvironment [50,54,64]. In pathogenic fungi, EVs have been implicated in processes such as cell wall remodeling, biofilm formation, and the transport of metabolites and hydrolytic enzymes [62,122,123,124]. Importantly, EVs also emerge as key components in modulating the host immune response [125]. Since protein sorting into EVs does not rely on explicit sequence-encoded signals, as observed for signal peptides that target proteins to the canonical ER-Golgi pathway, bioinformatic predictions of EV cargo remained a long-persisting challenge [47]. Recent advances in ML- and AI-based strategies have driven outbreaks in the identification of complex, multifactorial, or indirect biological features that contribute to various cellular processes [126,127,128,129].
Based on Random Forest ML models, a pioneering study demonstrated that EV association is indeed feasible using deep learning strategies [47]. This study was centered on comparative models constructed based on different training datasets. The first dataset included human EV proteins collected from databanks without applying any filter, while the second dataset included a filter for EV proteins detected through mass spectrometry, and the third one included a filter for proteins detected exclusively through mass spectrometry using high-purity EV isolation methods. The third ML training dataset was pointed out by the authors as the most suitable for predicting EV-associated proteins that are most likely to be detectable by mass spectrometry [47]. Validation of this dataset further contrasted different ML scenarios: one first model trained using sequence-based and annotation-based PTM features, and one second model trained exclusively on sequence-based protein features. A direct comparison of the two models revealed that the inclusion of experimentally annotated features recovered from PTM/Processing information available in UniProt substantially contributed to model performance metrics [47]. Therefore, the sequence-based-only ML model partly lost precision–recall capacity.
Applying annotation-based PTM features for the construction of fungal datasets would, however, not be feasible since virtually all fungal species lack proteome-wide experimental data on PTMs. Therefore, we advocate that the prediction of EV proteins in fungi should rely on continued efforts to increase the sensitivity of sequence-based ML models. In particular, the analysis of feature importance in the two models revealed that the annotated palmytoilation PTM was the single most relevant feature to determine EV association. In addition, MusiteDeep predictions for S-palmytoilation showed a notable amount of false-positive and false-negative hits, failing to recover biological patterns based on experimentally annotated PTMs. At the same time, we noted that alternative lipidation-like predictors such as Palm-Pred and GPS-Palm displayed PTM predictions that could potentially perform better and were not included in this model [47]. To consider other possibilities for the continued evolution of sequence-based models, future studies should contrast the performance of qualitative and quantitative approaches to PTM sites, while also searching to include novel protein features potentially associated with EV sorting. Most importantly, we acknowledge that a critical step to improve EV predictions in fungi is to construct robust training and validation ML datasets based on experimentally validated fungal EV proteins. This approach could potentially capture the nuances of fungal-specific EV patterns with greater success, contributing to its implementation across species.
The application of a sequence-based ML model to the proteome of M. circinelloides, as performed in this study, represents a pioneering systematic attempt to predict EV-associated proteins in fungi. For that reason, this analysis was designed with an exploratory scope, aiming primarily to determine whether ML models could capture biologically meaningful patterns when transferred across eukaryotic systems. A major observation derived from this approach was a high degree of similarity between the predicted M. circinelloides EV proteome and experimentally validated human EV datasets. Despite differences in organismal complexity and annotation depth, both systems displayed broadly comparable functional trends, as well as consistent subcellular localization profiles. These observations showed that sequence-derived features governing EV cargo composition can be captured through ML models applied to fungal proteomes.
Indeed, orthology analysis based on experimentally validated fungal EV proteins provided robust support for ML model predictive capacity. Despite the evolutionary distance between Mucoromycota and Ascomycota, 386 predicted M. circinelloides proteins (58.2% of all candidates) belonged to orthogroups shared with experimentally detected EV proteins from H. capsulatum. Such observation substantially strengthened ML model reliability: the 2.24-fold increase over random expectation of orthologue occurrence (p = 5.31 × 10−73) demonstrated that the predicted protein set was highly deterministic and strongly directed toward evolutionarily conserved EV features. Importantly, because this validation was performed using an independent dataset from a phylogenetically distant fungal species, the observed enrichment supports the conservation of molecular determinants underlying EV cargo composition in fungi. These findings indicate that ML approaches are thus capable of capturing biologically meaningful determinants of EV association, highlighting their potential for EV characterization across fungi. From such a paradigm, it becomes possible to discuss and propose solutions for advancing the study of EVs, including strategies for delimiting optimized protein features and fungal-specific training datasets for ML-based predictions, which might significantly improve performance metrics such as accuracy in true-positive and true-negative discovery rates.
The distribution of prediction scores across EV candidate proteins suggested a relatively narrow and continuous range, indicating that the model did not sharply separate EV from non-EV proteins but instead assigned probabilistic scores within a constrained interval. This pattern was consistent with a conservative classifier operating on distributed sequence signals, where EV association is not defined by discrete attributes but rather by combinatorial features. In that context, the model may be more appropriately interpreted as a ranking tool for prioritizing candidate proteins than as a strict binary classifier. Importantly, the ability of the model to recapitulate major orthology, functional, and cell localization patterns from experimentally characterized EV proteomes reinforces the potential of sequence-based ML approaches as a viable strategy. In this sense, the present study can be viewed as a proof-of-concept that provides an initial indication of the feasibility of this methodological approach. The results obtained establish a foundation for future efforts aimed at refining predictive models, incorporating improved sequence features, and, critically, generating experimentally verified fungal EV datasets for model retraining and validation. Ultimately, the integration of computational prediction with targeted experimental confirmations may support the systematic characterization of EV proteomes in fungi.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jof12060442/s1, Figure S1: Structural prediction of representative CAZymes from Mucor circinelloides; Figure S2: Structural prediction of intrinsically disordered proteins from Mucor circinelloides; Table S1: SecSPI_predicted; Table S2: CAZymes_predicted; Table S3: nonclassical_predicted; Table S4: EV_predicted; Table S5: high_confidence_human_EV_dataset; Table S6: orthogroups_EV_validation.

Author Contributions

J.N.-d.-R.: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Software, Visualization, Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing. M.E.R.L.: Data Curation, Formal analysis, Visualization, Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing. L.F.N.: Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing. S.M.: Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing. F.E.A.D.P.: Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing. F.A.: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors acknowledge the support of the following Brazilian funding agencies: São Paulo Research Foundation—FAPESP [Fellowship Nº 2021/04263-2 to João Neves-da-Rocha]; National Council for Scientific and Technological Development—CNPq; CAPES [Finance Code 001]; and FAEPA of the HCFMRP-USP.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
AAAuxiliary Activity
AUCArea Under the Curve
CAZymeCarbohydrate-Active Enzyme
CBMCarbohydrate-Binding Module
CECarbohydrate Esterase
EREndoplasmic Reticulum
EVExtracellular Vesicle
GHGlycoside Hydrolase
GTGlycosyl Transferase
HMMHidden Markov Model
MLMachine Learning
NNNeural Network
PAEPredicted Aligned Error
PLPolysaccharide Lyase
pLDDTPredicted Local Distance Difference Test
PTMPost-Translational Modification
ROCReceiver Operating Characteristic
TMHTransmembrane Helix

Appendix A

Table A1. List of extracellular Sec/SPI-negative proteins predicted to be secreted via non-classical pathways in M. circinelloides, including their SecretomeP NN scores, InterPro annotation status, and functional annotation.
Table A1. List of extracellular Sec/SPI-negative proteins predicted to be secreted via non-classical pathways in M. circinelloides, including their SecretomeP NN scores, InterPro annotation status, and functional annotation.
Protein_IDSecretomeP NN ScoreInterPro StatusAnnotation
EPB923390.919No hit-
EPB896830.88No hit-
EPB837600.826No hit-
EPB905350.824No hit-
EPB877680.811AnnotatedPhosphoesterase; Alkaline-phosphatase-like
EPB859670.803No hit-
EPB926170.797No hit-
EPB828150.774No hit-
EPB844640.717No hit-
EPB877260.709AnnotatedPeptidase S10, serine carboxypeptidase
EPB818630.695Featureconsensus disorder prediction
EPB922480.682Featureconsensus disorder prediction
EPB879630.64Featureconsensus disorder prediction
EPB833930.611AnnotatedPeptidase S9, prolyl oligopeptidase
EPB858740.608AnnotatedPeptidase M13; Metallopeptidase
EPB813970.577AnnotatedGlycosyl hydrolase family 18; Chitinase
EPB823470.573No hitconsensus disorder prediction
EPB929410.53No hit-
EPB818200.517AnnotatedMD-2-related lipid-recognition domain
EPB910550.509AnnotatedAspartic peptidase A1
EPB83486-AnnotatedGlycosyl hydrolase family 16; Beta-glucanase
EPB90259-AnnotatedGlycoside hydrolase family 46; Chitosanase
EPB81606-AnnotatedArmadillo-type fold
EPB81476-AnnotatedSecreted LysM effector LysM1-like
EPB90311-AnnotatedATG15 Lipase; Fungal lipase-type domain
EPB87092-Featureconsensus disorder prediction
EPB82275-Featureconsensus disorder prediction
EPB83180-No hit-
EPB81715-No hit-
EPB82158-No hit-

References

  1. Ritz, K.; Young, I.M. Interactions between soil structure and fungi. Mycologist 2004, 18, 52–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bailey, V.; Smith, A.; Tfaily, M.; Fansler, S.; Bond-Lamberty, B. Differences in soluble organic carbon chemistry in pore waters sampled from different pore size domains. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2017, 107, 133–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Nguyen, T.T.T.; de Santiago, A.L.C.M.A.; Hallsworth, J.E.; Cordeiro, T.R.L.; Voigt, K.; Kirk, P.M.; Crous, P.W.; Júnior, M.A.M.; Elsztein, C.; Lee, H.B. New Mucorales from opposite ends of the world. Stud. Mycol. 2024, 109, 273–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Mendoza, L.; Vilela, R.; Voelz, K.; Ibrahim, A.S.; Voigt, K.; Lee, S.C. Human Fungal Pathogens of Mucorales and Entomophthorales. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2014, 5, a019562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  5. Ruiz-Herrera, J.; Ortiz-Castellanos, L. Analysis of the phylogenetic relationships and evolution of the cell walls from yeasts and fungi. FEMS Yeast Res. 2010, 10, 225–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Spatafora, J.W.; Chang, Y.; Benny, G.L.; Lazarus, K.; Smith, M.E.; Berbee, M.L.; Bonito, G.; Corradi, N.; Grigoriev, I.; Gryganskyi, A.; et al. A phylum-level phylogenetic classification of zygomycete fungi based on genome-scale data. Mycologia 2016, 108, 1028–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Walther, G.; Wagner, L.; Kurzai, O. Updates on the Taxonomy of Mucorales with an Emphasis on Clinically Important Taxa. J. Fungi 2019, 5, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Wang, Y.; Chang, Y.; Ortañez, J.; Peña, J.F.; Carter-House, D.; Reynolds, N.K.; Smith, M.E.; Benny, G.; Mondo, S.J.; Salamov, A.; et al. Divergent Evolution of Early Terrestrial Fungi Reveals the Evolution of Mucormycosis Pathogenicity Factors. Genome Biol. Evol. 2023, 15, evad046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. López-Fernández, L.; Sanchis, M.; Navarro-Rodríguez, P.; Nicolás, F.E.; Silva-Franco, F.; Guarro, J.; Garre, V.; Navarro-Mendoza, M.I.; Pérez-Arques, C.; Capilla, J. Understanding Mucor circinelloides pathogenesis by comparative genomics and phenotypical studies. Virulence 2018, 9, 707–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Mohamed, H.; Naz, T.; Yang, J.; Shah, A.M.; Nazir, Y.; Song, Y. Recent Molecular Tools for the Genetic Manipulation of Highly Industrially Important Mucoromycota Fungi. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Muszewska, A.; Okrasińska, A.; Steczkiewicz, K.; Drgas, O.; Orłowska, M.; Perlińska-Lenart, U.; Aleksandrzak-Piekarczyk, T.; Szatraj, K.; Zielenkiewicz, U.; Piłsyk, S.; et al. Metabolic Potential, Ecology and Presence of Associated Bacteria Is Reflected in Genomic Diversity of Mucoromycotina. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 636986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Muszewska, A.; Taylor, J.W.; Szczesny, P.; Grynberg, M. Independent subtilases expansions in fungi associated with animals. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2011, 28, 3395–3404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zhao, H.; Ju, X.; Nie, Y.; James, T.Y.; Liu, X.Y. High-throughput screening carbon and nitrogen sources to promote growth and sporulation in Rhizopus arrhizus. AMB Express 2024, 14, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Fazili, A.B.A.; Shah, A.M.; Zan, X.; Naz, T.; Nosheen, S.; Nazir, Y.; Ullah, S.; Zhang, H.; Song, Y. Mucor circinelloides: A model organism for oleaginous fungi and its potential applications in bioactive lipid production. Microb. Cell Fact. 2022, 21, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Morin-Sardin, S.; Nodet, P.; Coton, E.; Jany, J.-L. Mucor: A Janus-faced fungal genus with human health impact and industrial applications. Fungal Biol. Rev. 2017, 31, 12–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hassan, M.I.A.; Voigt, K. Pathogenicity patterns of mucormycosis: Epidemiology, interaction with immune cells and virulence factors. Med. Mycol. 2019, 57, S245–S256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Jeong, W.; Keighley, C.; Wolfe, R.; Lee, W.L.; Slavin, M.A.; Kong, D.C.M.; Chen, S.C. The epidemiology and clinical manifestations of mucormycosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of case reports. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2019, 25, 26–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Roden, M.M.; Zaoutis, T.E.; Buchanan, W.L.; Knudsen, T.A.; Sarkisova, T.A.; Schaufele, R.L.; Sein, M.; Sein, T.; Chiou, C.C.; Chu, J.H.; et al. Epidemiology and outcome of zygomycosis: A review of 929 reported cases. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2005, 41, 634–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Tahiri, G.; Lax, C.; Cánovas-Márquez, J.T.; Carrillo-Marín, P.; Sanchis, M.; Navarro, E.; Garre, V.; Nicolás, F.E. and Mucormycosis: Recent Insights and Future Prospects. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Chang, Z.; Heitman, J. Drug-Resistant Epimutants Exhibit Organ-Specific Stability and Induction during Murine Infections Caused by the Human Fungal Pathogen Mucor circinelloides. mBio 2019, 10, 1110–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Son, Y.E.; Pérez-Arques, C.; Heitman, J. Epimutations driven by RNAi or heterochromatin evoke transient antimicrobial drug resistance in pathogenic Mucor fungi. PLoS Biol. 2026, 24, e3003598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Lee, S.C.; Li, A.; Calo, S.; Heitman, J. Calcineurin plays key roles in the dimorphic transition and virulence of the human pathogenic zygomycete Mucor circinelloides. PLoS Pathog. 2013, 9, e1003625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lee, S.C.; Li, A.; Calo, S.; Inoue, M.; Tonthat, N.K.; Bain, J.M.; Louw, J.; Shinohara, M.L.; Erwig, L.P.; Schumacher, M.A.; et al. Calcineurin orchestrates dimorphic transitions, antifungal drug responses and host-pathogen interactions of the pathogenic mucoralean fungus Mucor circinelloides. Mol. Microbiol. 2015, 97, 844–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Robbins, N.; Uppuluri, P.; Nett, J.; Rajendran, R.; Ramage, G.; Lopez-Ribot, J.L.; Andes, D.; Cowen, L.E. Hsp90 governs dispersion and drug resistance of fungal biofilms. PLoS Pathog. 2011, 7, e1002257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Karamyshev, A.L.; Tikhonova, E.B.; Karamysheva, Z.N. Translational Control of Secretory Proteins in Health and Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Kunze, M.; Berger, J. The similarity between N-terminal targeting signals for protein import into different organelles and its evolutionary relevance. Front. Physiol. 2015, 6, 259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Paetzel, M.; Karla, A.; Strynadka, N.C.; Dalbey, R.E. Signal peptidases. Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 4549–4580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Teufel, F.; Almagro Armenteros, J.J.; Johansen, A.R.; Gíslason, M.H.; Pihl, S.I.; Tsirigos, K.D.; Winther, O.; Brunak, S.; von Heijne, G.; Nielsen, H. SignalP 6.0 predicts all five types of signal peptides using protein language models. Nat. Biotechnol. 2022, 40, 1023–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Barlowe, C.K.; Miller, E.A. Secretory protein biogenesis and traffic in the early secretory pathway. Genetics 2013, 193, 383–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Ellgaard, L.; Helenius, A. Quality control in the endoplasmic reticulum. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2003, 4, 181–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Hellerschmied, D.; Serebrenik, Y.V.; Shao, L.; Burslem, G.M.; Crews, C.M. Protein folding state-dependent sorting at the Golgi apparatus. Mol. Biol. Cell 2019, 30, 2296–2308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Patel, C.; Saad, H.; Shenkman, M.; Lederkremer, G.Z. Oxidoreductases in Glycoprotein Glycosylation, Folding, and ERAD. Cells 2020, 9, 2138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Stanley, P. Golgi glycosylation. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2011, 3, a005199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Sun, X.; Tie, H.C.; Chen, B.; Lu, L. Glycans function as a Golgi export signal to promote the constitutive exocytic trafficking. J. Biol. Chem. 2020, 295, 14750–14762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Herkert, P.F.; Amatuzzi, R.F.; Alves, L.R.; Rodrigues, M.L. Extracellular Vesicles as Vehicles for the Delivery of Biologically Active Fungal Molecules. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 2019, 20, 1027–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. de Toledo Martins, S.; Szwarc, P.; Goldenberg, S.; Alves, L.R. Extracellular vesicles in fungi: Composition and functions. Fungal Physiol. Immunopathog. 2018, 422, 45–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Chu, Y.D.; Chen, M.C.; Yeh, C.T.; Lai, M.W. Hijacking host extracellular vesicle machinery by hepatotropic viruses: Current understandings and future prospects. J. Biomed. Sci. 2024, 31, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Ju, J.; Neuen, S.M.L.; van Zandvoort, M.; Keulers, T.G.H.; Rouschop, K.M.A. Extracellular vesicles: Cargo loading, degradation and secretory pathways, and their intersection with autophagy. Extracell. Vesicles Circ. Nucleic Acids 2025, 6, 360–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Juan, T.; Fürthauer, M. Biogenesis and function of ESCRT-dependent extracellular vesicles. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2018, 74, 66–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Kalra, H.; Drummen, G.P.; Mathivanan, S. Focus on Extracellular Vesicles: Introducing the Next Small Big Thing. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Van Niel, G.; d’Angelo, G.; Raposo, G. Shedding light on the cell biology of extracellular vesicles. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2018, 19, 213–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Carnino, J.M.; Ni, K.; Jin, Y. Post-translational Modification Regulates Formation and Cargo-Loading of Extracellular Vesicles. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Dixson, A.C.; Dawson, T.R.; Di Vizio, D.; Weaver, A.M. Context-specific regulation of extracellular vesicle biogenesis and cargo selection. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2023, 24, 454–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. MacDonald, C.; Buchkovich, N.J.; Stringer, D.K.; Emr, S.D.; Piper, R.C. Cargo ubiquitination is essential for multivesicular body intralumenal vesicle formation. EMBO Rep. 2012, 13, 331–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Raposo, G.; Stoorvogel, W. Extracellular vesicles: Exosomes, microvesicles, and friends. J. Cell Biol. 2013, 200, 373–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Mathieu, M.; Martin-Jaular, L.; Lavieu, G.; Théry, C. Specificities of secretion and uptake of exosomes and other extracellular vesicles for cell-to-cell communication. Nat. Cell Biol. 2019, 21, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Waury, K.; Gogishvili, D.; Nieuwland, R.; Chatterjee, M.; Teunissen, C.E.; Abeln, S. Proteome encoded determinants of protein sorting into extracellular vesicles. J. Extracell. Biol. 2024, 3, e120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Doyle, L.M.; Wang, M.Z. Overview of Extracellular Vesicles, Their Origin, Composition, Purpose, and Methods for Exosome Isolation and Analysis. Cells 2019, 8, 727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Oliveira, B.T.M.; Bitencourt, T.A.; Santos, P.; Pagano, A.D.; Pessoni, A.M.; Rezende, C.P.; Piraine, R.A.; Masson, A.P.; Faça, V.; Campos, V.F.; et al. Deciphering cargo contents in extracellular vesicles of Candida haemulonii var. vulnera. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 2025, 27, 1887–1900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Trentin, G.; Bitencourt, T.A.; Guedes, A.; Pessoni, A.M.; Brauer, V.S.; Pereira, A.K.; Costa, J.H.; Fill, T.P.; Almeida, F. Mass Spectrometry Analysis Reveals Lipids Induced by Oxidative Stress in Candida albicans Extracellular Vesicles. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Turchinovich, A.; Drapkina, O.; Tonevitsky, A. Transcriptome of Extracellular Vesicles: State-of-the-Art. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Welsh, J.A.; Goberdhan, D.C.; O’Driscoll, L.; Buzas, E.I.; Blenkiron, C.; Bussolati, B.; Cai, H.; Di Vizio, D.; Driedonks, T.A.; Erdbrügger, U. Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles (MISEV2023): From basic to advanced approaches. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2024, 13, e12404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Théry, C.; Witwer, K.W.; Aikawa, E.; Alcaraz, M.J.; Anderson, J.D.; Andriantsitohaina, R.; Antoniou, A.; Arab, T.; Archer, F.; Atkin-Smith, G.K. Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles 2018 (MISEV2018): A position statement of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles and update of the MISEV2014 guidelines. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2018, 7, 1535750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Bitencourt, T.A.; Hatanaka, O.; Pessoni, A.M.; Freitas, M.S.; Trentin, G.; Santos, P.; Rossi, A.; Martinez-Rossi, N.M.; Alves, L.L.; Casadevall, A.; et al. Fungal Extracellular Vesicles Are Involved in Intraspecies Intracellular Communication. mBio 2022, 13, e0327221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Freitas, M.S.; Bitencourt, T.A.; Rezende, C.P.; Martins, N.S.; Dourado, T.M.H.; Tirapelli, C.R.; Almeida, F. Extracellular Vesicles Display Increased. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Honorato, L.; Sabino, A.L.R.d.; Artunduaga Bonilla, J.J.; Mendoza, S.R.; Kornetz, J.; Dos Reis, F.C.G.; Albergoni, E.R.; Alves, V.; Frases, S.; Guimarães, A.J.; et al. Extracellular vesicles of Emergomyces africanus modulate host immune responses and reflect metabolic adaptations to nutrient availability. Infect. Immun. 2026, 94, e0063225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Kulig, K.; Majerz, Z.; Kowalik, K.; Mical, M.; Bednarek, A.; Satala, D.; Juszczak, M.; Labedzka-Dmoch, K.; Barczyk-Woznicka, O.; Pyza, E.; et al. Impact of extracellular vesicles from various species of Candida fungi on the cross-species interactions with human epithelial cells. Arch. Microbiol. 2026, 208, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Las-Casas, L.O.; Mellon, D.A.; Bezerra, B.T.; Souza, C.M.; Reis, F.C.G.; Rodrigues, M.L. An experimental approach to investigate extracellular vesicle-mediated transfer of lipids between fungal cells. Microbiol. Spectr. 2026, 14, e0360425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Rodrigues, M.L.; Nimrichter, L.; Oliveira, D.L.; Frases, S.; Miranda, K.; Zaragoza, O.; Alvarez, M.; Nakouzi, A.; Feldmesser, M.; Casadevall, A. Vesicular polysaccharide export in Cryptococcus neoformans is a eukaryotic solution to the problem of fungal trans-cell wall transport. Eukaryot. Cell 2007, 6, 48–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Vargas, G.; Rocha, J.D.; Oliveira, D.L.; Albuquerque, P.C.; Frases, S.; Santos, S.S.; Nosanchuk, J.D.; Gomes, A.M.; Medeiros, L.C.; Miranda, K.; et al. Compositional and immunobiological analyses of extracellular vesicles released by Candida albicans. Cell Microbiol. 2015, 17, 389–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Fu, J.; Fu, L.; Zhai, B.; Shi, H.; Yang, H. Camel milk extracellular vesicles as a promising antibiotic alternative: Gastrointestinal stability, antimicrobial, and immunoregulatory activities. Sci. Rep. 2026, 16, 8903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Garcia-Ceron, D.; Wilson, S.M.; Bleackley, M.R.; Anderson, M.A. Immunogold labeling of extracellular vesicles from the fungal pathogen Fusarium graminearum reveals the presence of the protein marker Sur7. Fungal Biol. Biotechnol. 2025, 13, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Nenciarini, S.; Cavalieri, D. Immunomodulatory Potential of Fungal Extracellular Vesicles: Insights for Therapeutic Applications. Biomolecules 2023, 13, 1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Rodrigues, M.L.; Janbon, G.; O’Connell, R.J.; Chu, T.T.; May, R.C.; Jin, H.; Reis, F.C.G.; Alves, L.R.; Puccia, R.; Fill, T.P.; et al. Characterizing extracellular vesicles of human fungal pathogens. Nat. Microbiol. 2025, 10, 825–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Arora, A.; Patiyal, S.; Sharma, N.; Devi, N.L.; Kaur, D.; Raghava, G.P.S. A random forest model for predicting exosomal proteins using evolutionary information and motifs. Proteomics 2024, 24, e2300231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Ras-Carmona, A.; Gomez-Perosanz, M.; Reche, P.A. Prediction of unconventional protein secretion by exosomes. BMC Bioinform. 2021, 22, 333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Tiwari, A.; Widodo; Krisnawati, D.I.; Tzou, K.Y.; Kuo, T.R. Machine learning for extracellular vesicles enables diagnostic and therapeutic nanobiotechnology. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2026, 24, 153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Zhang, Y.; Yu, L.; Yang, M.; Han, B.; Luo, J.; Jing, R. Model fusion for predicting unconventional proteins secreted by exosomes using deep learning. Proteomics 2024, 24, e2300184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. You, C.; Dai, F.; Dai, B.; Wu, W.; Fang, L.; Jia, W.; Han, X.; Su, Z.; Li, J. Application of machine learning-based exosome-related gene profiles in precision diagnosis and treatment of osteoarthritis. Sci. Rep. 2025, 16, 3176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. He, Y.; Li, Y.; Tang, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Liu, R.; Yang, Z.; Li, H.; Wei, J. Machine learning-driven identification of exosome- related biomarkers in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Front. Immunol. 2025, 16, 1590331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Dyer, S.C.; Austine-Orimoloye, O.; Azov, A.G.; Barba, M.; Barnes, I.; Barrera-Enriquez, V.P.; Becker, A.; Bennett, R.; Beracochea, M.; Berry, A. Ensembl 2025. Nucleic Acids Res. 2025, 53, D948–D957. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  72. Hallgren, J.; Tsirigos, K.D.; Pedersen, M.D.; Almagro Armenteros, J.J.; Marcatili, P.; Nielsen, H.; Krogh, A.; Winther, O. DeepTMHMM predicts alpha and beta transmembrane proteins using deep neural networks. bioRxiv 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Potter, S.C.; Luciani, A.; Eddy, S.R.; Park, Y.; Lopez, R.; Finn, R.D. HMMER web server: 2018 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, W200–W204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Finn, R.D.; Clements, J.; Eddy, S.R. HMMER web server: Interactive sequence similarity searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39, W29–W37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Zheng, J.; Ge, Q.; Yan, Y.; Zhang, X.; Huang, L.; Yin, Y. dbCAN3: Automated carbohydrate-active enzyme and substrate annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51, W115–W121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Buchfink, B.; Reuter, K.; Drost, H.G. Sensitive protein alignments at tree-of-life scale using DIAMOND. Nat. Methods 2021, 18, 366–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Buchfink, B.; Xie, C.; Huson, D.H. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat. Methods 2015, 12, 59–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Ødum, M.T.; Teufel, F.; Thumuluri, V.; Almagro Armenteros, J.J.; Johansen, A.R.; Winther, O.; Nielsen, H. DeepLoc 2.1: Multi-label membrane protein type prediction using protein language models. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024, 52, W215–W220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Bendtsen, J.D.; Jensen, L.J.; Blom, N.; Von Heijne, G.; Brunak, S. Feature-based prediction of non-classical and leaderless protein secretion. Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 2004, 17, 349–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Høie, M.H.; Kiehl, E.N.; Petersen, B.; Nielsen, M.; Winther, O.; Nielsen, H.; Hallgren, J.; Marcatili, P. NetSurfP-3.0: Accurate and fast prediction of protein structural features by protein language models and deep learning. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022, 50, W510–W515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Wang, D.; Liu, D.; Yuchi, J.; He, F.; Jiang, Y.; Cai, S.; Li, J.; Xu, D. MusiteDeep: A deep-learning based webserver for protein post-translational modification site prediction and visualization. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020, 48, W140–W146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Jones, P.; Binns, D.; Chang, H.Y.; Fraser, M.; Li, W.; McAnulla, C.; McWilliam, H.; Maslen, J.; Mitchell, A.; Nuka, G.; et al. InterProScan 5: Genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 1236–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Matos Baltazar, L.; Nakayasu, E.S.; Sobreira, T.J.; Choi, H.; Casadevall, A.; Nimrichter, L.; Nosanchuk, J.D. Antibody Binding Alters the Characteristics and Contents of Extracellular Vesicles Released by Histoplasma capsulatum. mSphere 2016, 1, e00085-15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Emms, D.M.; Kelly, S. OrthoFinder: Scalable phylogenetic orthology inference for comparative genomics. Genome Biol. 2019, 20, 238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. World Health Organization. Landscape Analysis of Commercially Available and Pipeline In Vitro Diagnostics for Fungal Priority Pathogens; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2025; Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240105539 (accessed on 25 January 2026).
  86. Jabeen, G.; Naz, S.A.; Rangel, D.E.N.; Jabeen, N.; Shafique, M.; Yasmeen, K. In-vitro evaluation of virulence markers and antifungal resistance of clinical Candida albicans strains isolated from Karachi, Pakistan. Fungal Biol. 2023, 127, 1241–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Nagel, J.H.; Wingfield, M.J.; Slippers, B. Increased abundance of secreted hydrolytic enzymes and secondary metabolite gene clusters define the genomes of latent plant pathogens in the Botryosphaeriaceae. BMC Genom. 2021, 22, 589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Schaller, M.; Borelli, C.; Korting, H.C.; Hube, B. Hydrolytic enzymes as virulence factors of Candida albicans. Mycoses 2005, 48, 365–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Latgé, J.P.; Beauvais, A.; Chamilos, G. The Cell Wall of the Human Fungal Pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus: Biosynthesis, Organization, Immune Response, and Virulence. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2017, 71, 99–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Lange, L. Fungal Enzymes and Yeasts for Conversion of Plant Biomass to Bioenergy and High-Value Products. Microbiol. Spectr. 2017, 5, 1029–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Monclaro, A.V.; Gorgulho Silva, C.O.; Gomes, H.A.R.; Moreira, L.R.S.; Filho, E.X.F. The enzyme interactome concept in filamentous fungi linked to biomass valorization. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 344, 126200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Li, X.; Hou, Y.; Yue, L.; Liu, S.; Du, J.; Sun, S. Potential Targets for Antifungal Drug Discovery Based on Growth and Virulence in Candida albicans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015, 59, 5885–5891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Li, C.H.; Cervantes, M.; Springer, D.J.; Boekhout, T.; Ruiz-Vazquez, R.M.; Torres-Martinez, S.R.; Heitman, J.; Lee, S.C. Sporangiospore size dimorphism is linked to virulence of Mucor circinelloides. PLoS Pathog. 2011, 7, e1002086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Pawłowska, J.; Okrasińska, A.; Kisło, K.; Aleksandrzak-Piekarczyk, T.; Szatraj, K.; Dolatabadi, S.; Muszewska, A. Carbon assimilation profiles of Mucoralean fungi show their metabolic versatility. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 11864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Ellis, J.G.; Dodds, P.N.; Lawrence, G.J. The role of secreted proteins in diseases of plants caused by rust, powdery mildew and smut fungi. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2007, 10, 326–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. McCotter, S.W.; Horianopoulos, L.C.; Kronstad, J.W. Regulation of the fungal secretome. Curr. Genet. 2016, 62, 533–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Varona, S.; Lavín, J.L.; Oguiza, J.A. Secretomes of medically important fungi reflect morphological and phylogenetic diversity. Fungal Biol. 2020, 124, 915–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Monod, M.; Capoccia, S.; Léchenne, B.; Zaugg, C.; Holdom, M.; Jousson, O. Secreted proteases from pathogenic fungi. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2002, 292, 405–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Naglik, J.R.; Challacombe, S.J.; Hube, B. Candida albicans secreted aspartyl proteinases in virulence and pathogenesis. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2003, 67, 400–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Burchacka, E.; Pięta, P.; Łupicka-Słowik, A. Recent advances in fungal serine protease inhibitors. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2022, 146, 112523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Hedstrom, L. Serine protease mechanism and specificity. Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 4501–4524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Gao, B.J.; Mou, Y.N.; Tong, S.M.; Ying, S.H.; Feng, M.G. Subtilisin-like Pr1 proteases marking the evolution of pathogenicity in a wide-spectrum insect-pathogenic fungus. Virulence 2020, 11, 365–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Miyoshi, S.-i.; Shinoda, S. Microbial metalloproteases and pathogenesis. Microbes Infect. 2000, 2, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Zhang, X.; Wang, Y.; Chi, W.; Shi, Y.; Chen, S.; Lin, D.; Jin, Y. Metalloprotease genes of Trichophyton mentagrophytes are important for pathogenicity. Med. Mycol. 2014, 52, 36–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Shende, R.; Wong, S.S.W.; Rapole, S.; Beau, R.; Ibrahim-Granet, O.; Monod, M.; Gührs, K.H.; Pal, J.K.; Latgé, J.P.; Madan, T.; et al. conidial metalloprotease Mep1p cleaves host complement proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 2018, 293, 15538–15555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Cantarel, B.L.; Coutinho, P.M.; Rancurel, C.; Bernard, T.; Lombard, V.; Henrissat, B. The Carbohydrate-Active EnZymes database (CAZy): An expert resource for glycogenomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, D233–D238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Gow, N.A.; Latge, J.-P.; Munro, C.A. The fungal cell wall: Structure, biosynthesis, and function. Microbiol. Spectr. 2017, 5, 1221–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Free, S.J. Fungal cell wall organization and biosynthesis. Adv. Genet. 2013, 81, 33–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Hage, H.; Rosso, M.N. Evolution of Fungal Carbohydrate-Active Enzyme Portfolios and Adaptation to Plant Cell-Wall Polymers. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Biely, P. Microbial carbohydrate esterases deacetylating plant polysaccharides. Biotechnol. Adv. 2012, 30, 1575–1588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Lombard, V.; Golaconda Ramulu, H.; Drula, E.; Coutinho, P.M.; Henrissat, B. The carbohydrate-active enzymes database (CAZy) in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, D490–D495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Beeson, W.T.; Vu, V.V.; Span, E.A.; Phillips, C.M.; Marletta, M.A. Cellulose degradation by polysaccharide monooxygenases. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2015, 84, 923–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Levasseur, A.; Drula, E.; Lombard, V.; Coutinho, P.M.; Henrissat, B. Expansion of the enzymatic repertoire of the CAZy database to integrate auxiliary redox enzymes. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2013, 6, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Abbott, D.W.; van Bueren, A.L. Using structure to inform carbohydrate binding module function. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2014, 28, 32–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Ran, Q.; Zhang, D.; Jiang, W.; Zhang, H.; Cheng, W.; Li, H.; Liu, J.; Jiang, Z. How carbohydrate-binding module affects the catalytic properties of endoglucanase. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 278, 134653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Sista Kameshwar, A.K.; Qin, W. Structural and functional properties of pectin and lignin–carbohydrate complexes de-esterases: A review. Bioresour. Bioprocess. 2018, 5, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Vellozo-Echevarria, T.; Barrett, K.; Vuillemin, M.; Meyer, A.S. Mini-Review: The distinct carbohydrate active enzyme secretome of Rhizopus spp. represents fitness for mycelium remodeling and solid-state plant food fermentation. ACS Omega 2024, 9, 34185–34195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Lebreton, A.; Corre, E.; Jany, J.-L.; Brillet-Guéguen, L.; Pèrez-Arques, C.; Garre, V.; Monsoor, M.; Debuchy, R.; Le Meur, C.; Coton, E. Comparative genomics applied to Mucor species with different lifestyles. BMC Genom. 2020, 21, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Homa, M.; Ibragimova, S.; Szebenyi, C.; Nagy, G.; Zsindely, N.; Bodai, L.; Vágvölgyi, C.; Papp, T. Differential Gene Expression of Mucor lusitanicus under Aerobic and Anaerobic Conditions. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Aspromonte, M.C.; Nugnes, M.V.; Quaglia, F.; Bouharoua, A.; Tosatto, S.C.E.; Piovesan, D.; Consortium, D. DisProt in 2024: Improving function annotation of intrinsically disordered proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024, 52, D434–D441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Sickmeier, M.; Hamilton, J.A.; LeGall, T.; Vacic, V.; Cortese, M.S.; Tantos, A.; Szabo, B.; Tompa, P.; Chen, J.; Uversky, V.N. DisProt: The database of disordered proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35, D786–D793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Freitas, M.S.; Bonato, V.L.D.; Pessoni, A.M.; Rodrigues, M.L.; Casadevall, A.; Almeida, F. Fungal extracellular vesicles as potential targets for immune interventions. Msphere 2019, 4, e00747-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Rizzo, J.; Rodrigues, M.L.; Janbon, G. Extracellular Vesicles in Fungi: Past, Present, and Future Perspectives. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Brandt, P.; Singha, R.; Ene, I.V. Hidden allies: How extracellular vesicles drive biofilm formation, stress adaptation, and host-immune interactions in human fungal pathogens. mBio 2024, 15, e0304523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Bitencourt, T.A.; Rezende, C.P.; Quaresemin, N.R.; Moreno, P.; Hatanaka, O.; Rossi, A.; Martinez-Rossi, N.M.; Almeida, F. Extracellular Vesicles From the Dermatophyte Trichophyton interdigitale Modulate Macrophage and Keratinocyte Functions. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 2343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Berrar, D.; Dubitzky, W. Deep learning in bioinformatics and biomedicine. Brief. Bioinform. 2021, 22, 1513–1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Libbrecht, M.W.; Noble, W.S. Machine learning applications in genetics and genomics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2015, 16, 321–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Jumper, J.; Evans, R.; Pritzel, A.; Green, T.; Figurnov, M.; Ronneberger, O.; Tunyasuvunakool, K.; Bates, R.; Žídek, A.; Potapenko, A. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 2021, 596, 583–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Rives, A.; Meier, J.; Sercu, T.; Goyal, S.; Lin, Z.; Liu, J.; Guo, D.; Ott, M.; Zitnick, C.L.; Ma, J.; et al. Biological structure and function emerge from scaling unsupervised learning to 250 million protein sequences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2016239118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Characterization of the classical secretome of Mucor circinelloides. (A) Venn diagram showing the overlap between Sec/SPI-positive proteins predicted by SignalP v6.0 and proteins lacking transmembrane helices (TMH = 0) as identified by DeepTMHMM, defining the core classical secretome. (B) Horizontal bar plot summarizing the main functional categories of Sec/SPI-positive proteins and their respective abundances based on annotation. (C) Pie chart depicting the distribution of protease classes within the secretome. (D) Pie chart showing the subclass distribution of serine proteases, indicating the predominance of subtilisin-like enzymes.
Figure 1. Characterization of the classical secretome of Mucor circinelloides. (A) Venn diagram showing the overlap between Sec/SPI-positive proteins predicted by SignalP v6.0 and proteins lacking transmembrane helices (TMH = 0) as identified by DeepTMHMM, defining the core classical secretome. (B) Horizontal bar plot summarizing the main functional categories of Sec/SPI-positive proteins and their respective abundances based on annotation. (C) Pie chart depicting the distribution of protease classes within the secretome. (D) Pie chart showing the subclass distribution of serine proteases, indicating the predominance of subtilisin-like enzymes.
Jof 12 00442 g001
Figure 2. Classification of CAZymes in the secretome of Mucor circinelloides. (A) Donut chart illustrating the proportional distribution of CAZy classes based on the total number of identified CAZyme proteins. (B) Bar plot showing the abundance of individual CAZy families within the Sec/SPI-positive dataset.
Figure 2. Classification of CAZymes in the secretome of Mucor circinelloides. (A) Donut chart illustrating the proportional distribution of CAZy classes based on the total number of identified CAZyme proteins. (B) Bar plot showing the abundance of individual CAZy families within the Sec/SPI-positive dataset.
Jof 12 00442 g002
Figure 3. Characterization of Sec-independent extracellular proteins of Mucor circinelloides. (A) Venn diagram showing the overlap between Sec/SPI-negative proteins predicted by DeepLoc after SignalP filtering, proteins lacking transmembrane helices (TMH = 0) as identified by DeepTMHMM, and SecretomeP predictions of non-classical secreted proteins. (B) Horizontal bar plot summarizing the main functional categories of Sec/SPI-negative proteins and their respective abundances based on annotation.
Figure 3. Characterization of Sec-independent extracellular proteins of Mucor circinelloides. (A) Venn diagram showing the overlap between Sec/SPI-negative proteins predicted by DeepLoc after SignalP filtering, proteins lacking transmembrane helices (TMH = 0) as identified by DeepTMHMM, and SecretomeP predictions of non-classical secreted proteins. (B) Horizontal bar plot summarizing the main functional categories of Sec/SPI-negative proteins and their respective abundances based on annotation.
Jof 12 00442 g003
Figure 4. Sequence-based machine-learning prediction of extracellular vesicle (EV) proteins. (A) Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve showing the performance of the Random Forest model, with the corresponding area under the curve (AUC) indicating its discriminative power. The red dashed line represents a theoretical random classifier. (B) Normalized confusion matrix illustrating the classification performance of the model on the validation dataset. Model training and validation were performed on two independent curated datasets of human proteins, filtered to include true-positive proteins identified exclusively by mass spectrometry using high-purity EV isolation methods [47]. (C) Distribution of predicted EV scores across the proteome of Mucor circinelloides, indicating the cutoff corresponding to the top 5% highest-scoring proteins (red dashed line), which were selected as candidate EV-associated proteins for exploratory analyses.
Figure 4. Sequence-based machine-learning prediction of extracellular vesicle (EV) proteins. (A) Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve showing the performance of the Random Forest model, with the corresponding area under the curve (AUC) indicating its discriminative power. The red dashed line represents a theoretical random classifier. (B) Normalized confusion matrix illustrating the classification performance of the model on the validation dataset. Model training and validation were performed on two independent curated datasets of human proteins, filtered to include true-positive proteins identified exclusively by mass spectrometry using high-purity EV isolation methods [47]. (C) Distribution of predicted EV scores across the proteome of Mucor circinelloides, indicating the cutoff corresponding to the top 5% highest-scoring proteins (red dashed line), which were selected as candidate EV-associated proteins for exploratory analyses.
Jof 12 00442 g004
Figure 5. Functional and subcellular characterization of predicted and experimentally supported extracellular vesicle (EV)-associated proteins. Panels (AC) represent the top 5% highest-scoring EV candidates identified in the proteome of Mucor circinelloides based on machine-learning (ML) predictions. (A) Distribution of proteins across major functional categories. (B) Composition of metabolic subcategories within the fungal EV dataset. (C) Proportional distribution of subcellular localizations predicted using DeepLoc v2.1. Panels (DF) depict the corresponding analyses for a curated dataset of 2649 high-confidence human EV proteins, defined by identification through mass spectrometry and high-purity EV isolation methods. (D) Functional classification across major categories. (E) Distribution of metabolic subcategories. (F) Subcellular localization profile based on a representative subset of 500 proteins used for sampling. These analyses supported a qualitative comparison of functional patterns between ML-predicted fungal EV candidates and experimentally supported human EV proteins.
Figure 5. Functional and subcellular characterization of predicted and experimentally supported extracellular vesicle (EV)-associated proteins. Panels (AC) represent the top 5% highest-scoring EV candidates identified in the proteome of Mucor circinelloides based on machine-learning (ML) predictions. (A) Distribution of proteins across major functional categories. (B) Composition of metabolic subcategories within the fungal EV dataset. (C) Proportional distribution of subcellular localizations predicted using DeepLoc v2.1. Panels (DF) depict the corresponding analyses for a curated dataset of 2649 high-confidence human EV proteins, defined by identification through mass spectrometry and high-purity EV isolation methods. (D) Functional classification across major categories. (E) Distribution of metabolic subcategories. (F) Subcellular localization profile based on a representative subset of 500 proteins used for sampling. These analyses supported a qualitative comparison of functional patterns between ML-predicted fungal EV candidates and experimentally supported human EV proteins.
Jof 12 00442 g005
Figure 6. Orthology-based validation of machine-learning (ML) predictions contrasting the 5% highest-scoring extracellular vesicle (EV)-associated candidates in Mucor circinelloides (N = 663 proteins) against a dataset of 1110 proteins experimentally identified in EVs from Histoplasma capsulatum. (A) Distribution of orthology categories identified by OrthoFinder. Stacked bar plots show the proportions of orthologues that are shared between M. circinelloides and H. capsulatum, species-specific orthologues, and proteins without orthologues within the two datasets. Values inside each bar indicate the number of orthogroups or proteins assigned to each category. (B) Enrichment analysis comparing the observed number of M. circinelloides proteins with orthologues among EV-associated proteins of H. capsulatum against the number expected under a random model. (C) Null distribution of shared orthologues generated by permutation analysis. A total of 100,000 random samplings of 663 proteins were performed from the complete M. circinelloides proteome (12,611 proteins), and the number of proteins expected to possess orthologues within the EV-associated dataset of H. capsulatum (1110 proteins) was recorded for each iteration. The red dashed line indicates the observed number of orthologues (386), whereas the black dotted line indicates the mean value expected under the null model (172.2). The observed enrichment strongly supports the ML model predictive capacity in fungal datasets.
Figure 6. Orthology-based validation of machine-learning (ML) predictions contrasting the 5% highest-scoring extracellular vesicle (EV)-associated candidates in Mucor circinelloides (N = 663 proteins) against a dataset of 1110 proteins experimentally identified in EVs from Histoplasma capsulatum. (A) Distribution of orthology categories identified by OrthoFinder. Stacked bar plots show the proportions of orthologues that are shared between M. circinelloides and H. capsulatum, species-specific orthologues, and proteins without orthologues within the two datasets. Values inside each bar indicate the number of orthogroups or proteins assigned to each category. (B) Enrichment analysis comparing the observed number of M. circinelloides proteins with orthologues among EV-associated proteins of H. capsulatum against the number expected under a random model. (C) Null distribution of shared orthologues generated by permutation analysis. A total of 100,000 random samplings of 663 proteins were performed from the complete M. circinelloides proteome (12,611 proteins), and the number of proteins expected to possess orthologues within the EV-associated dataset of H. capsulatum (1110 proteins) was recorded for each iteration. The red dashed line indicates the observed number of orthologues (386), whereas the black dotted line indicates the mean value expected under the null model (172.2). The observed enrichment strongly supports the ML model predictive capacity in fungal datasets.
Jof 12 00442 g006
Table 1. Functional associations of CAZy families in the classical secretome of M. circinelloides.
Table 1. Functional associations of CAZy families in the classical secretome of M. circinelloides.
Associated FunctionCAZy FamiliesNumber of Proteins
Fungal cell wall remodelingCE4, GH18, GH20, GH7240
Plant polysaccharide degradationCE1, CE16, GH3, GH5, GH9, GH16, GH152, GH17, GH28, GH45, GH46, GH81, GH134, PL8, PL1436
Glycan biosynthesis/modificationGH15, GH29, GH31, GH37, GH47, GH63, GT1, GT4, GT15, GT21, GT7731
Carbohydrate-binding moduleCBM1, CBM5, CBM18, CBM19, CBM20, CBM21, CBM48, CBM5017
Auxiliary oxidative activitiesAA1, AA2, AA3, AA5, AA129
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Neves-da-Rocha, J.; Lopes, M.E.R.; Nogueira, L.F.; Moghadam, S.; De Paiva, F.E.A.; Almeida, F. Machine-Learning Prediction of Extracellular Vesicle Protein Sorting Expands the Characterization of Secretory Functions in Mucor circinelloides. J. Fungi 2026, 12, 442. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof12060442

AMA Style

Neves-da-Rocha J, Lopes MER, Nogueira LF, Moghadam S, De Paiva FEA, Almeida F. Machine-Learning Prediction of Extracellular Vesicle Protein Sorting Expands the Characterization of Secretory Functions in Mucor circinelloides. Journal of Fungi. 2026; 12(6):442. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof12060442

Chicago/Turabian Style

Neves-da-Rocha, João, Marcos E. R. Lopes, Lucas F. Nogueira, Shaghayegh Moghadam, Felipe E. A. De Paiva, and Fausto Almeida. 2026. "Machine-Learning Prediction of Extracellular Vesicle Protein Sorting Expands the Characterization of Secretory Functions in Mucor circinelloides" Journal of Fungi 12, no. 6: 442. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof12060442

APA Style

Neves-da-Rocha, J., Lopes, M. E. R., Nogueira, L. F., Moghadam, S., De Paiva, F. E. A., & Almeida, F. (2026). Machine-Learning Prediction of Extracellular Vesicle Protein Sorting Expands the Characterization of Secretory Functions in Mucor circinelloides. Journal of Fungi, 12(6), 442. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof12060442

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop