Next Article in Journal
Digital Technologies—And Teacher Wellbeing?
Previous Article in Journal
A Scoping Review of Organizational Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic in Schools: A Complex Systems Perspective
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Adaptation of Kirkpatrick’s Four-Level Model of Training Criteria to Evaluate Training Programmes for Head Teachers

by
Aljawharah Alsalamah
* and
Carol Callinan
School of Education, University of Lincoln, Lincoln LN6 7TS, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Educ. Sci. 2021, 11(3), 116; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11030116
Submission received: 3 February 2021 / Revised: 26 February 2021 / Accepted: 6 March 2021 / Published: 11 March 2021

Abstract

Training programmes are evaluated to verify their effectiveness, assess their ability to achieve their goals and identify the areas that require improvement. Therefore, the target of evaluators is to develop an appropriate framework for evaluating training programmes. This study adapted Kirkpatrick’s four-level model of training criteria published in 1959 to evaluate training programmes for head teachers according to their own perceptions and those of their supervisors. The adapted model may help evaluators to conceptualise the assessment of learning outcomes of training programmes with metrics and instruments. The model also helps to determine the strengths and weaknesses of the training process. The adaptation includes concrete metrics and instruments for each of the four levels in the model: reaction criteria, learning criteria, behaviour criteria and results criteria. The adapted model was applied to evaluate 12 training programmes for female head teachers in Saudi Arabia. The study sample comprised 250 trainee head teachers and 12 supervisors. The results indicated that the adapted Kirkpatrick evaluation model was very effective in evaluating educational training for head teachers.
Keywords: Kirkpatrick model; assessment; evaluation; training programme; head teachers Kirkpatrick model; assessment; evaluation; training programme; head teachers

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alsalamah, A.; Callinan, C. Adaptation of Kirkpatrick’s Four-Level Model of Training Criteria to Evaluate Training Programmes for Head Teachers. Educ. Sci. 2021, 11, 116. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11030116

AMA Style

Alsalamah A, Callinan C. Adaptation of Kirkpatrick’s Four-Level Model of Training Criteria to Evaluate Training Programmes for Head Teachers. Education Sciences. 2021; 11(3):116. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11030116

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alsalamah, Aljawharah, and Carol Callinan. 2021. "Adaptation of Kirkpatrick’s Four-Level Model of Training Criteria to Evaluate Training Programmes for Head Teachers" Education Sciences 11, no. 3: 116. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11030116

APA Style

Alsalamah, A., & Callinan, C. (2021). Adaptation of Kirkpatrick’s Four-Level Model of Training Criteria to Evaluate Training Programmes for Head Teachers. Education Sciences, 11(3), 116. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11030116

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop