Next Article in Journal
Probability-Based Fatigue Life Prediction of Additively Manufactured GH4169 Components Based on Volume-Defect Weakest Link Theory
Previous Article in Journal
Preliminary Development and Experimental Validation of a Clustering Hybrid Rocket Module for Soft-Landing Application
Previous Article in Special Issue
Structural Equation Modeling for Airspace Optimization: The Analysis of Causal Factors Influencing Aviation Safety
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Review

Demand and Capacity Management of Runway Systems: A Review

1
College of Civil Aviation, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Air Traffic Management System, Nanjing 211106, China
3
College of Engineering, San Jose State University, San Jose, CA 95192-0061, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Aerospace 2026, 13(6), 560; https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace13060560 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 14 May 2026 / Revised: 12 June 2026 / Accepted: 16 June 2026 / Published: 18 June 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emerging Trends in Air Traffic Flow and Airport Operations Control)

Abstract

Runway systems serve as the critical interface between airports and terminal airspace, and their efficient operation is essential for balancing air traffic demand and airport capacity. With the continuous growth of air traffic, intelligent runway demand and capacity management has become increasingly important for mitigating congestion and delays. This paper presents a comprehensive review of runway capacity–demand management from both supply-side and demand-side perspectives. On the supply side, runway configuration selection is reviewed, including runway configuration capacity envelopes, influencing factors, and existing optimization methodologies, such as prescriptive models, descriptive models, and reinforcement learning approaches. On the demand side, flight runway sequencing for arrivals, departures, and integrated arrival–departure operations is systematically analyzed. Problem analogies, operational characteristics, optimization objectives, and solution algorithms are discussed in detail. A critical comparison of existing methodologies is conducted from the perspectives of solution quality, real-time capability, human interpretability, technology readiness, trust requirements, and human–AI collaboration. Finally, future research directions are identified, including integrated runway management, multi-airport coordination, uncertainty-aware optimization, human–AI decision support, AI-enabled runway management, and integrated manned–unmanned operations. The review provides a reference for researchers, airport operators, air navigation service providers, and decision-support system developers seeking to improve runway operational efficiency and safety.
Keywords: air traffic management; airport runway system; runway configuration; flight sequencing air traffic management; airport runway system; runway configuration; flight sequencing

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jiang, H.; Zeng, W.; Zhou, H.; Lu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Wei, W. Demand and Capacity Management of Runway Systems: A Review. Aerospace 2026, 13, 560. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace13060560

AMA Style

Jiang H, Zeng W, Zhou H, Lu Y, Chen Y, Wei W. Demand and Capacity Management of Runway Systems: A Review. Aerospace. 2026; 13(6):560. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace13060560

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jiang, Hao, Weili Zeng, Hainuo Zhou, Yannan Lu, Yuheng Chen, and Wenbin Wei. 2026. "Demand and Capacity Management of Runway Systems: A Review" Aerospace 13, no. 6: 560. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace13060560

APA Style

Jiang, H., Zeng, W., Zhou, H., Lu, Y., Chen, Y., & Wei, W. (2026). Demand and Capacity Management of Runway Systems: A Review. Aerospace, 13(6), 560. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace13060560

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop