Skip to Content
PlantsPlants
  • Review
  • Open Access

23 May 2026

26 Pages

Curcuma longa L. and Curcumin in Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production: Phytochemistry, Biological Mechanisms and Practical Applications

,
,
,
,
and
1
Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, University of Life Sciences “King Mihai I” from Timișoara, Calea Aradului 119, 300645 Timișoara, Romania
2
Doctoral School “Veterinary Medicine”, University of Life Sciences “King Mihai I” from Timişoara, Calea Aradului 119, 300645 Timişoara, Romania
3
Department of Toxicology, University of Life Sciences “King Mihai I” from Timișoara, Calea Aradului 119, 300645 Timișoara, Romania
4
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Life Sciences “King Mihai I” from Timișoara, Calea Aradului 119, 300645 Timișoara, Romania

Abstract

Interest in phytotherapy and phytogenic additives in veterinary medicine and animal production has increased considerably, driven by the search for functional alternatives to extensive antimicrobial use and the growing emphasis on food safety. In this context, Curcuma longa L. and its main bioactive compound, curcumin, have attracted attention because of their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory and antimicrobial properties. This review synthesizes recent evidence on the use of C. longa and curcumin in veterinary medicine, with emphasis on the botanical and phytochemical basis of the plant, the main biological mechanisms involved, and reported applications in poultry, swine, ruminants, aquaculture, and companion animals. It further highlights that the interpretation of findings is strongly influenced by botanical identity, phytochemical variability, product type, standardization, dose and route of administration. Available evidence indicates promising effects on antioxidant status, intestinal health, productive performance and hepatic protection in selected experimental models. However, translation into practice remains constrained by the low oral bioavailability of curcumin, formulation heterogeneity and inconsistent reporting. Overall, C. longa represents a promising phytogenic resource, but robust veterinary recommendations require studies in target species, better characterized products and standardized experimental protocols for application.

1. Introduction

The use of phytotherapy and phytogenic additives in veterinary medicine and animal production has increased significantly over the last decade, in the context of concerns regarding antimicrobial resistance and the need for sustainable alternatives to antibiotic use in intensive systems. In this framework, plant-derived compounds are of interest because they may act through multiple mechanisms, including antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial and immunomodulatory effects, contributing to the maintenance of animal health and performance. However, an essential aspect in the interpretation of results is the phytochemical composition and standardisation of preparations [1,2,3]. Curcuma longa L. (turmeric) is one of the most extensively studied plants with potential applications in veterinary medicine, mainly due to curcuminoids, particularly curcumin, and the volatile fraction of the rhizome, compounds associated with relevant effects in inflammation and oxidative stress [4]. The available studies indicate its use both in functional nutrition and as an adjuvant in different pathological conditions, including chronic disorders in companion animals [5]. However, the reported results are often inconsistent due to the significant variability in phytochemical composition; the type of product used, such as powder, standardised extract or advanced formulations; and differences in doses and administration protocols [3,6]. Although numerous studies have highlighted beneficial effects of curcumin on productive performance, intestinal health, antioxidant status and immune response in different animal species (Figure 1), the translation of these findings into practice remains limited by low oral bioavailability and the absence of standardised protocols. In addition, pharmacokinetic data suggest reduced systemic exposure, which raises questions regarding the actual mechanisms of action and the clinical relevance of the observed effects [7,8,9].
Figure 1. Overview of bioactive compounds, molecular mechanisms, and applications of C. longa in animal systems. Source: Author’s own elaboration using Microsoft PowerPoint.
In this context, there is a clear need for a critical synthesis of the available data that takes into account differences between forms of administration, doses and animal species, as well as the methodological limitations of existing studies. Therefore, the aim of this review is to analyse the use of C. longa and curcumin in veterinary medicine, with emphasis on biological mechanisms, species-specific applications and critical aspects relevant to practice, including dose, formulation, safety and standardisation, while also highlighting existing gaps and future research directions.

Literature Search and Selection Approach

This review is a narrative review that provides a critical synthesis of current evidence regarding the phytochemistry, biological mechanisms, and veterinary applications of C. longa and curcumin. A targeted literature search was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science Core Collection, and Scopus to identify relevant studies published up to March 2026, including the latest available publications at the time of writing. Additional sources were identified through Google Scholar for supplementary citation tracking and the inclusion of recently published articles not yet fully indexed across databases. The final search was performed on 5 March 2026. The search strategy combined controlled vocabulary and free-text terms related to C. longa, curcumin, turmeric-derived products, and veterinary or animal production applications. Representative keywords included “Curcuma longa”, “curcumin”, “turmeric”, “curcuminoids”, “essential oil”, “turmerones”, “phytogenic feed additive”, “veterinary medicine”, “animal production”, “poultry”, “swine”, “ruminants”, “aquaculture”, “companion animals”, “antioxidant”, “anti-inflammatory”, “immunomodulatory”, “antimicrobial”, “bioavailability”, and “formulation”. Eligible studies included in vitro investigations, in vivo animal studies, and, where available, clinical or controlled studies relevant to veterinary medicine, animal nutrition, or animal health. Priority was given to studies reporting clearly defined biological, productive, or mechanistic outcomes, including antioxidant status, inflammatory markers, intestinal health, productive performance, hepatic protection, immune response, and pharmacokinetic or bioavailability-related parameters. Greater emphasis was placed on studies that provided adequate characterization of the plant material or product investigated, including botanical identification, plant part used, extraction method, curcuminoid profile, volatile fraction, formulation type, and route of administration. Particular attention was also given to studies in target animal species and papers discussing standardization, comparability of preparations, and limitations affecting translation into veterinary practice.
In addition to the narrative synthesis described above, a complementary bibliometric analysis was conducted based on the 73 references included in this review, with the aim of further characterising research trends and thematic directions within the field. The analysed literature covers the period from 2009 to 2026, highlighting a progressive increase in scientific interest in C. longa, curcumin, and their applications in animal health and production. The annual distribution of publications is as follows: 2009: 1; 2013: 1; 2014: 2; 2015: 1; 2016: 3; 2017: 3; 2018: 1; 2019: 3; 2020: 7; 2021: 9; 2022: 12; 2023: 8; 2024: 11; 2025: 10; and 2026: 1 (Figure 2). One reference corresponds to a database source rather than a conventional scientific article. The highest number of publications was recorded in 2022, followed by 2024 and 2025, reflecting a marked intensification of research activity in recent years. The analysis of the references indicates that research on C. longa is distributed across a wide range of animal species, with a predominant focus on production animals. Poultry, particularly broiler chickens, represents the most frequently investigated category, followed by swine, ruminants, aquaculture species, and, to a lesser extent, companion animals and experimental models. This distribution highlights the increasing relevance of curcumin as a phytogenic feed additive in animal production systems. The bibliometric analysis included 73 scientific references, from which 372 keywords were identified, of which 240 were unique. To create the diagram, only keywords that appeared at least three times were selected in order to highlight the most relevant thematic directions in the analysed literature. Based on this criterion, the frequency diagram presented in Figure 3 was developed. The results show that the dominant term is “Curcumin”, with 32 occurrences, confirming the central role of curcumin in the included studies. The terms “Curcuma longa” and “Turmeric”, each with 11 occurrences, indicate the direct link between the bioactive compound and its plant source. The frequency of terms such as “Antioxidant”, “Growth performance”, “Bioavailability”, “Curcuminoids”, “Anti-inflammatory”, and “Oxidative stress” suggests that the main research directions are focused on the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects, bioavailability, and biological applications of curcumin. In addition, terms such as “Nutraceutical”, “Health”, “Liver”, and “Pharmacological activities” highlight the interest in the use of curcumin in health, nutrition, and pharmacological applications. Thus, the distribution of keywords shows that the analysed literature focuses mainly on the bioactive potential of curcumin and its relevance as an antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and nutraceutical agent.
Figure 2. Annual distribution of publications related to C. longa and curcumin in animal studies (2009–2026). Source: Author’s own elaboration using Microsoft Excel.
Figure 3. Frequency distribution of the keywords identified in the analysed literature. Source: Author’s own elaboration using Microsoft Excel.
Overall, the bibliometric findings indicate a clear transition from general phytochemical and pharmacological research towards more applied studies in animal nutrition and veterinary medicine. This trend underscores the growing importance of C. longa as a multifunctional natural source with significant potential for improving performance, immune function, gut health, oxidative balance, and disease resistance in animals.
This review does not follow a systematic review protocol and does not include a formal risk-of-bias assessment or meta-analysis. Instead, it aims to provide a structured and critical narrative synthesis of the available evidence, with emphasis on the distinction between rhizome-derived preparations, extracts, essential oil fractions, and pure curcumin, as well as on the implications of formulation heterogeneity for interpretation and practical application.

2. Taxonomy, Botanical Description and Geographical Distribution

2.1. Taxonomy

C. longa is taxonomically classified within the family Zingiberaceae and the genus Curcuma (Figure 4), a predominantly Asian group comprising numerous morphologically similar species, which may complicate the accurate identification of plant material and requires caution when assigning the species name [10].
Figure 4. Taxonomy of C. longa. Source: Author’s own elaboration using Microsoft PowerPoint.
Analyses based on chloroplast genomes suggest that phylogenetic relationships within the genus Curcuma can be effectively clarified through cpDNA (chloroplast DNA) comparisons at the genus level, providing a useful framework for delimitation and authentication [10]. In addition, a study integrating DNA barcoding and chemical fingerprinting across several Curcuma species highlighted variability among taxa and demonstrated the need for rigorous authentication of plant raw materials before interpreting phytochemical and biological results. This perspective is particularly relevant, as the absence of proper authentication may lead to the erroneous attribution of phytochemical profiles to C. longa when the analyzed material actually originates from other species within the genus [11]. Moreover, evidence of historical hybridization events reported within the genus Curcuma may further complicate taxonomic delimitation and reinforces the need to combine genetic markers with clear botanical descriptions and reproducible identification criteria [12]. Therefore, in the context of this review, the use of the full name C. longa and the explicit reporting of identification and authentication criteria represent essential conditions for the comparability of the studies synthesized below.

2.2. Botanical Description and Morphology

C. longa is a perennial rhizomatous herbaceous plant in which the underground rhizome functions as a perennation organ, supporting the regeneration of the aerial parts and the storage of resources [13]. From a genomic and cytogenetic perspective, the species is described as polyploid, and recent data for cultivated turmeric report a triploid chromosome number of 2n = 3× = 63. This status may have consequences for reproduction and for the uniformity of cultivated materials, which is relevant to the interpretation of comparisons between studies and the reproducibility of results [14]. The rhizome is the main economic organ of the plant and the principal source for most phytochemical investigations associated with turmeric, including the volatile fraction and essential oil. The literature also emphasizes that the essential oil profile depends on the characteristics of the raw material and on technological variables such as extraction method and processing, which makes it necessary to describe clearly the type of rhizome used and its condition in experimental reports [15].
In addition, a study on volatile constituents in several Curcuma species, including C. longa, showed that volatile profiling can support comparisons between batches and origins, thereby contributing to the characterization and control of variability among plant materials [16].

2.3. Reproduction, Cultivation and Variability

In agricultural practice, turmeric is propagated predominantly by vegetative means through rhizomes, a characteristic that may favor the maintenance of local lines but may also contribute to the persistence of regional differences depending on the planting material and production systems. In this context, a study on Indian germplasm highlighted variability among accessions both in rhizome traits and in curcuminoid content, indicating that C. longa may encompass a considerable range of phytochemical profiles and agronomic characteristics [17]. In addition, recent genomic data suggest that particular features of the genome and chromosomal architecture may be associated with biochemical differences, reinforcing the need for rigorous characterization of the plant material used in experimental and applied studies [14].

2.4. Geographical Distribution

C. longa is a rhizomatous species widely cultivated in tropical and subtropical regions worldwide because of its adaptation to warm and humid environments and its economic importance as a source of spice and bioactive compounds, including curcuminoids [18]. Membership of the family Zingiberaceae and its current predominantly agricultural distribution reflect the expansion of cultivation across many warm regions of the world, such as Asia, Africa and South America, where tropical and subtropical conditions favor rhizome development [19,20]. A major concentration of turmeric resources is found in South and Southeast Asia, as well as in cultivation-associated regions including India, China, Thailand, Singapore, the Philippines, Malaysia, Indonesia and Australia, suggesting a global distribution that is largely dependent on agricultural practices and trade. From a production perspective, India dominates global turmeric production, accounting for approximately 80% of the total, while other countries such as China, Myanmar, Nigeria and Bangladesh contribute smaller but still significant shares (Figure 5) [18]. Studies on germplasm indicate high genetic and phenotypic diversity among accessions cultivated in India, reflected in variation in rhizome traits and curcuminoid content, which confirms the role of this region as an important reservoir of genetic resources for cultivated turmeric. This variability among accessions, documented through agronomic and metabolic differences, suggests that geographical origin and planting material may influence the physicochemical characteristics of the raw material used in studies [17].
In addition, local agro climatic factors, such as minimum relative humidity, altitude, nitrogen content and soil pH, have been significantly associated with variation in curcumin content in rhizomes, indicating a link between the cultivation environment and phytochemical profiles [21]. In addition to the curcuminoid fraction, the essential oil composition of C. longa rhizomes also shows variability according to variety and cultivation conditions, with differences reported in the abundance of major volatile components among the analyzed materials. Studies on essential oils obtained from rhizomes cultivated in the northern United States, specifically in Alabama, identified dominant compounds such as α-turmerone, ar-turmerone, β-turmerone, 1,8-cineole, β-sesquiphellandrene, α-phellandrene and α-zingiberene, with proportions varying among varieties, suggesting chemical plasticity associated with genotype and agroclimatic context [19].
At the same time, it has been emphasized that the essential oil profile is also influenced by the characteristics of the raw material and the extraction method, which makes it necessary to report these parameters when comparing materials derived from different regions [15]. Overall, the available evidence indicates that the geographical distribution of C. longa reflects not only its cultivation range but also the interaction between genetic variability and environmental factors, which shape its phytochemical composition, including the essential oil profile, with direct implications for the comparative interpretation of biological results and the agricultural and biomedical applications of turmeric [19,21].

3. Phytochemical Composition of C. longa and Main Determinants of Chemical Variability

3.1. General Phytochemical Profile of the Rhizome

The rhizome of C. longa contains two major phytochemical fractions: a non-volatile fraction, mainly represented by curcuminoids, and a volatile fraction consisting of an essential oil rich in terpenoids, especially turmerone-type sesquiterpenes [15]. The recent literature highlights the importance of rhizome chemical characterization for the standardization of turmeric-derived products and explaining batch-to-batch variability [18]. It is important to relate phytochemical descriptions to the plant organ analysed, since most available data concern the rhizome, and its composition may differ from that of the aerial parts (Figure 5) [15]. In addition, metabolomics studies indicate that quality assessment may benefit from fingerprinting approaches and marker panels rather than relying only on a single compound [22,23].

3.2. Curcuminoids

Curcuminoids are the main markers used for the identification and quality control of C. longa. Curcumin is usually the predominant constituent, accounting for 60 to 75% of the curcuminoid fraction, followed by desmethoxycurcumin and bisdemethoxycurcumin (Figure 5) [24].
Figure 5. Overview of C. longa. (a) Global distribution of C. longa. Countries are classified according to the level of cultivation and production potential: high, moderate or low. (b) Botanical structure of C. longa, highlighting the rhizome as the main source of bioactive compounds, including curcuminoids such as curcumin, desmethoxycurcumin and bisdemethoxycurcumin, as well as volatile compounds, namely turmerones. (c) Chemical structure of curcumin. Adapted from PubChem [25]. Source: Author’s own elaboration using Microsoft PowerPoint.
At the rhizome level, total curcuminoids may represent about 3 to 5% of the total mass, although their content depends on plant material and processing conditions [26]. Agro-ecological factors such as relative humidity, altitude, soil nitrogen and soil pH may significantly influence curcumin content, making provenance and cultivation conditions important when comparing reported values [21]. Genomic studies also provide a useful framework for understanding the biosynthesis and regulation of curcuminoids in C. longa [27]. Furthermore, DNA barcoding combined with HPLC (High-Performance Liquid Chromatography) fingerprinting has shown interspecific differences within the genus Curcuma, supporting the need for reliable botanical authentication in comparative phytochemical studies [11]. Some markers may still show limited discriminatory power between closely related taxa, which reinforces the need for careful species verification before interpretation [28].

3.3. Essential Oil

The essential oil of turmeric represents the volatile fraction of the rhizome and is commonly described as being rich in sesquiterpenes, particularly turmerone-type compounds [15]. Differences in the abundance of major constituents such as α-turmerone, β-turmerone and ar-turmerone have been reported among varieties cultivated under different conditions [19]. More broadly, the volatile profile of Curcuma species, including C. longa, may vary according to both genetic and environmental factors [16]. Therefore, comparisons of volatile profiles should take into account not only origin and variety but also the extraction procedure and operating conditions, since these can substantially affect the reported composition [15]. Recent genomic evidence also suggests that variation in terpenoid biosynthesis may be associated with structural features of the genome and terpene synthase-related genes [14]. Overall, the rhizome should be regarded as a complex phytochemical matrix combining volatile and non-volatile constituents [29].

3.4. Minor Metabolites, Mineral Elements and the Influence of the Cultivation System

Untargeted analytical approaches, including HPLC-MS/MS (High-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry) and molecular networking, have revealed additional metabolites in rhizome extracts beyond the classical curcuminoid profile, supporting the value of chemical fingerprinting for sample comparison [22]. In addition, the mineral composition of the rhizome may vary according to soil conditions and fertilisation practices [30]. The rhizosphere microbiome and plant growth-promoting microorganisms may also influence nutrient availability, plant physiology and the accumulation of secondary metabolites, including curcumin and related compounds [31].

3.5. Implications for Standardization and Comparability of Studies

The literature indicates that phytochemical variability in C. longa may result from genetic background, provenance, cultivation conditions, post-harvest processing and extraction methods [15]. For this reason, studies should clearly report the type of plant material analysed, the extraction system and the analytical method used, particularly for curcuminoid quantification [26]. Similarly, comparisons of the volatile fraction should be interpreted in relation to the essential oil isolation method and extraction conditions [15]. The integration of genomic tools with phytochemical data may improve understanding of the biological basis of chemical variability [27]. In parallel, data from DNA barcoding and HPLC fingerprinting show that chemical profiles differ among Curcuma taxa and samples, making botanical identity and chemical characterization essential for the interpretation of biological results [11].

4. Biological and Functional Mechanisms of Compounds from C. longa

To support the understanding of the biological and functional mechanisms of compounds derived from C. longa, a schematic overview of the key physiological processes involved in their synthesis, transport, and accumulation is presented in Figure 6.
Figure 6. Schematic overview of the main physiological processes in C. longa associated with the synthesis, transport, and accumulation of bioactive compounds. Source: Author’s own elaboration using Microsoft PowerPoint.

4.1. Antioxidant Activity and Cytoprotective Response

Curcumin has been reported to modulate the cellular antioxidant response through activation of Keap1–Nrf2 (Keap1—Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1; Nrf2—Nuclear factor erythroid 2–related factor 2) signaling and stimulation of the expression of genes dependent on the ARE element (antioxidant response) [32]. Activation of Nrf2 is associated with the induction of transcription of ARE-dependent cytoprotective genes, including HO-1 (heme oxygenase-1) and NQO1 (quinone oxidoreductase 1), supporting a transcriptionally regulated antioxidant mechanism. In addition, recent reviews describe antioxidant networks as being interconnected with other redox signaling nodes, and curcumin is discussed in this context as a multi-target agent capable of simultaneously influencing several cellular response pathways [33].
Curcumin is therefore discussed as a modulator of the Nrf2/ARE axis, a conserved mechanism of the cellular antioxidant response, which links rhizome-derived metabolites with adaptation to oxidative stress [32].

4.2. Anti-Inflammatory Activity

Species of the genus Curcuma may act on targets within signaling pathways, inhibit pro-inflammatory enzymes, and reduce the production of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, thereby supporting the concept of an anti-inflammatory effect through the reduction of pro-inflammatory mediators and the modulation of signaling pathways. Curcumin is discussed as a modulator of inflammation and has been reported to suppress NF-κB (nuclear Factor kappa B) activation in certain models and reduce downstream inflammatory mediators, including COX-2 (cyclooxygenase) and iNOS (inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase) production [34]. Curcumin has also been reported to inhibit activation of the NLRP3 (the NOD-like receptor (NLR) family, the pyrin domain containing 3) inflammasome in a cell model based on THP-1 (monocytic cell line) cells differentiated into macrophages with PMA (phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate). This effect was evidenced by reduced NLRP3 expression, decreased caspase-1 cleavage, and diminished IL-1β (interleukin-1 beta) maturation and secretion. The authors associated these effects with inhibition of TLR4 (toll-like receptor 4) and MyD88 (myeloid Differentiation Primary Response 88) signaling and reduced NF-κB activation. The involvement of the purinergic receptor P2X7R (purinergic 2 × 7 receptor) was supported by the finding that P2X7R silencing attenuated the inflammatory response and reduced phosphorylation of the NF-κB p65 subunit, together with a decrease in inflammasome markers, suggesting a role for P2X7R in amplifying inflammasome activation through NF-κB-dependent pathways [35].

4.3. Antimicrobial Activity

Curcumin has been described as having anti-infective properties, including antibacterial activity, and it has also been reported to act on multiple targets and mechanisms in experimental models. Within the same framework, effects on virulence-related processes and biofilm formation have also been reported, including interference with quorum sensing, which is particularly relevant for bacterial phenotypes that are difficult to control in infections [36]. The comparative interpretation of antimicrobial studies using curcumin should be made in relation to the form and formulation administered, since poor solubility, limited stability in aqueous media and low bioavailability may alter effective exposure and influence the reported outcomes [37,38].

4.4. Immunomodulation

Immunomodulatory effects have been reported for species of the genus Curcuma and their compounds, with C. longa being identified as the most extensively investigated species in the literature. These effects are discussed mainly in relation to changes in inflammatory mediators and cytokines, as well as the involvement of intracellular signaling pathways, including nodes such as NF-κB, in certain experimental models. At the same time, an important methodological limitation has been highlighted: many of the reported findings are derived from poorly characterized and non-standardized crude extracts, which makes the precise attribution of mechanisms to a specific metabolite more difficult [39].

4.5. Immunomodulation Contribution of the Volatile Fraction (Turmerones) and Distinction of Its Mechanisms from Those of Curcuminoids

It has been reported that the essential oil of turmeric rhizome contains α-turmerone, ar-turmerone and β-turmerone as its main constituents, and these compounds have been associated with biological effects in certain models. In this context, the available data suggest that the volatile fraction may contribute to bioactivity through mechanisms reported for turmerones and other essential oil constituents, which may only partially overlap with those attributed to curcumin [18]. In a study based on activity-guided isolation, the dichloromethane fraction showed the highest anti-inflammatory activity, and among the compounds subsequently isolated, β-turmerone was the most active [40]. When interpreting the applied sections, it is advisable that the type of product derived from C. longa be reported explicitly, for example, essential oil versus the non-volatile fraction or a curcuminoid-rich extract, because the chemical profile and bioactivity may depend on the fraction analyzed and the conditions of preparation, thereby reducing the risk of unjustified generalizations at the species level [15].
Table 1 summarizes the main biological and functional mechanisms associated with compounds from C. longa.
Table 1. Main biological and functional mechanisms associated with compounds from C. longa.

5. Veterinary Applications of C. longa

In veterinary medicine, C. longa and curcumin have been investigated mainly as phytogenic feed additives and supportive nutraceuticals, particularly in production animals and aquaculture. The available evidence suggests potential benefits in growth performance, antioxidant balance, intestinal health and resilience to inflammatory or toxic challenges. However, the strength of evidence varies among species, and the reported outcomes are influenced by formulation, dose and study design.

5.1. Poultry

In poultry production, curcumin has attracted considerable interest as a feed additive capable of supporting productive performance, intestinal function and oxidative balance. A recent meta-analysis including 28 studies reported increases in average daily gain and improvements in feed conversion in broiler chickens receiving dietary curcumin, together with improvements in antioxidant status and intestinal morphology. The doses used in experimental studies vary considerably, from 10 mg/kg to 5000 mg/kg feed in certain experimental formulations, depending on the type of product and study design. However, most studies report inclusion levels within the range of 100 to 400 mg/kg feed, administered over periods of 21 to 52 days. Curcumin is predominantly used in its standard form, but also as nanoformulations, which may influence dosage levels and biological efficacy. These results support the potential relevance of curcumin in nutritional strategies aimed at improving poultry health and efficiency under intensive production conditions [2,7]. Curcumin supplementation was associated with reduced oxidative stress and tissue lesions at both hepatic and ileal levels, contributing to the attenuation of mycotoxin-induced toxic effects and supporting its usefulness in their nutritional management [41]. Its veterinary relevance is further supported by studies based on experimental challenge models. In broiler chickens exposed to feed contaminated with aflatoxin B1, the effects of curcumin were evaluated in a 28-day study using four experimental groups: control, AFB1 at 1 mg/kg, CUR at 500 mg/kg and AFB1 + CUR [42]. Similarly, protective effects have been reported in broiler chickens exposed to low levels of aflatoxin B1, at 0.02 mg/kg feed, where the administration of 400 mg/kg dietary curcumin for 10 days was associated with reduced renal oxidative stress. In addition, curcumin supplementation in broiler chickens infected with Eimeria tenella improved the anticoccidial index and was associated with increased antioxidant capacity, reduced inflammatory response and improved intestinal barrier function. In this case, the birds received 200 mg/kg dietary curcumin in a 42-day feeding study [43]. Overall, these data indicate that curcumin may have a relevant role in poultry production not only in supporting performance but also as an adjuvant under conditions associated with enteric and toxicological stress.

5.2. Swine

In swine, the most relevant context for curcumin supplementation is the post-weaning period, which is frequently associated with oxidative stress, impairment of intestinal barrier function and reduced growth performance. In Wuzhishan piglets, dietary administration of curcumin, either individually or in combination with piperine, improved feed efficiency, reduced serum markers of intestinal permeability and increased antioxidant capacity, indicating a beneficial effect on intestinal integrity and redox balance [44]. In this context, in weaned Wuzhishan piglets aged 35 days, curcumin was administered in the diet at doses of 200 and 300 mg/kg, alone or in combination with piperine at 50 mg/kg, within an experimental design involving five groups. These observations are of veterinary interest, as intestinal dysfunction during the weaning period remains a major challenge in swine production.
Curcumin has also been evaluated in piglets with intrauterine growth restriction, where dietary supplementation increased hepatic antioxidant capacity and upregulated responses associated with the Nrf2 and Hmox1 pathways [45]. In this context, in weaned piglets with intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), the effects of curcumin were evaluated in an experimental study with four groups: NBW (normal-birth-weight), NBW + curcumin, IUGR and IUGR + curcumin. Dietary supplementation was associated with improved antioxidant capacity and growth performance. In this context, curcumin may contribute to the nutritional support of piglets with increased metabolic vulnerability. Although the available studies are encouraging, the current evidence remains largely experimental, and validation under commercial production conditions is required [44,45].

5.3. Ruminants

In ruminants, curcumin has mainly been studied in relation to ruminal fermentation, microbial protein synthesis and systemic antioxidant status. In growing lambs, supplementation improved growth performance, ruminal fermentation parameters, ruminal microbial protein synthesis and certain indicators of serum antioxidant capacity [46]. In this context, in lambs aged approximately 120 days, curcumin was administered in the diet at doses of 300, 600 and 900 mg/kg, within a randomised experimental design involving four groups: control, 300 CUR, 600 CUR and 900 CUR. This was associated with improved ruminal fermentation, microbial protein synthesis and antioxidant capacity. At the same time, higher doses were associated with changes in specific ruminal microbial populations, suggesting the importance of optimising the level of administration in systems dependent on fibre digestion [46]. From a veterinary and nutritional perspective, these results indicate that curcumin may support ruminal function and oxidative balance, although its effects should be interpreted in the context of the complexity of the ruminal ecosystem.
In dairy cows, turmeric has more frequently been evaluated within multicomponent phytogenic formulations than as an isolated substance. In Jersey cows, the administration of a mixture of free and microencapsulated essential oils, turmeric and tannins was associated with improved productive efficiency and certain health status parameters [47]. In this type of approach, a phytobiotic additive containing cinnamon and oregano essential oils, turmeric extract and tannins was administered at a dose of 2 g/cow/day for 45 days, within an experimental design involving two groups: control and treatment. This was correlated with improvements in productive efficiency, milk composition, and antioxidant and immune status. Convergent results were also reported in lactating Jersey cows receiving combinations of phytogenic compounds that included turmeric extract, with beneficial effects observed on productive efficiency, milk composition, the ruminal environment and certain indicators of health status [48]. In addition, the administration of a complex phytoactive mixture over two lactation phases of 45 days each was associated with improved milk production and quality, ruminal environment and health status. These results are relevant for the veterinary management of herds and for nutritional support; however, the effects should be interpreted at the level of the entire phytogenic formulation and should not be attributed exclusively to curcumin.

5.4. Aquaculture

In aquaculture, curcumin is increasingly being investigated as a natural feed additive with the potential to improve growth, immune response and oxidative balance. In gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata), dietary administration of curcumin improved growth and haematobiochemical parameters and increased intestinal antibacterial capacity [8]. It was used in the diet at levels of 1.5 to 3% over a period of 150 days, within a controlled experimental design. In snakehead fish (Channa argus), curcumin supplementation improved growth performance and attenuated the inflammatory response following a lipopolysaccharide challenge test [49]. This was observed under conditions in which doses of 0, 100, 200, 400 and 800 mg/kg were administered for 8 weeks, within a five-group experimental design. In red tilapia (Oreochromis sp.), supplementation was associated with improved growth performance, feed utilisation efficiency, redox balance and certain immunological parameters, as well as favourable histological changes and increased expression of antioxidant genes in the liver [50]. Levels of 0.4, 0.6 and 0.8 g/kg diet were used over a period of 60 days, within a four-group design.
The hepatic relevance of curcumin is also highlighted under combined stress conditions. In grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella) exposed to ochratoxin A and hypoxia, supplementation with 400 mg/kg curcumin for 60 days, within a four-group design comprising control, OTA at 1.2 mg/kg, CUR and OTA + CUR, was associated with reduced liver lesions, oxidative stress and cellular apoptosis [51]. These findings are particularly relevant for fish farming systems, where nutritional, toxicological and environmental factors may act simultaneously and directly influence animal health and productivity. Overall, the evidence suggests that curcumin may have practical value as a supportive dietary component in aquaculture, particularly under intensive farming conditions.

5.5. Companion Animals

In companion animals, the most relevant clinical evidence regarding the use of curcumin currently concerns the management of osteoarthritis. In dogs, a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study showed that a diet supplemented with curcuminoid extract, hydrolysed collagen and green tea extract may improve pain-related indicators, although the main objective parameters did not differ significantly between groups [5]. Administration of this mixture for 3 months was associated with reduced pain on manipulation and improvements in certain functional parameters, suggesting a potential clinical benefit, despite the moderate level of evidence. More recent data support the role of curcumin-containing nutraceuticals in canine joint disease. A supplement including Curcumin C3 Complex, glucosamine and chondroitin, administered for 30 days, was associated with reduced serum inflammatory markers, namely MMP-3 (matrix metalloproteinase-3) and TNF-α (tumour necrosis factor alpha), and pain relief [52], strengthening interest in the use of curcumin within multimodal nutritional strategies. In cats, a diet enriched with EPA (eicosapentaenoic acid), DHA (docosahexaenoic acid), turmeric extract and hydrolysed collagen demonstrated beneficial effects in naturally occurring osteoarthritis [53]. Administered over a period of 13 weeks, followed by a 4-week washout period, it was associated with improved mobility, reduced pain and improved joint function, with no adverse effects observed. Overall, these data indicate that turmeric-derived ingredients may represent useful adjuvant nutritional tools in companion animal medicine, particularly in chronic musculoskeletal disorders. However, the multicomponent nature of these formulations limits the possibility of attributing the observed effects exclusively to curcumin.
In addition to its effects in musculoskeletal disorders, curcumin has also been investigated for its anticancer potential in veterinary medicine. In dogs with spontaneously occurring tumours, a liposomal curcumin formulation, Lipocurc™, (SignPath Pharma Inc., Quakertown, PA, USA), demonstrated antiproliferative and antiangiogenic effects in vitro. In a pilot clinical study, it was administered intravenously at a dose of 10 mg/kg, as 8 h infusions repeated weekly for 4 weeks, and was associated with disease stabilisation in some animals, without significant tumour regression, suggesting a possible adjuvant role [54]. Experimental evidence, predominantly in vitro, supports these observations. Studies on canine cell lines have shown dose-dependent antiproliferative effects and induction of apoptosis, both in mammary tumours (2.5 to 200 µM, 24 to 72 h) and in urothelial carcinoma (12,000 to 18,000 ng/mL, 72 h), including in combination with chemotherapeutic agents, where synergistic effects were observed [55,56]. Experimental studies in other animals also indicate the ability of curcumin to inhibit tumour growth and modulate oxidative stress and signalling pathways involved in carcinogenesis; however, these data remain largely preclinical [57]. Nevertheless, clinical evidence remains limited, with most data originating from in vitro studies or pilot studies with small sample sizes. In addition, the low bioavailability of curcumin may limit its clinical efficacy, justifying the use of advanced formulations such as liposomal systems or nanoformulations [54,57]. Overall, curcumin shows promising potential as a complementary therapy in veterinary oncology, particularly in canine cancers. However, well-designed in vivo studies and large-scale controlled clinical trials are required to validate its efficacy and establish standardised therapeutic protocols [54,56,57].
The veterinary applications of C. longa and curcumin across different animal species are summarized in Table 2.
Table 2. Veterinary applications of C. longa and curcumin across animal species.
However, from a practical perspective, large-scale applicability in animal production also depends on economic aspects, including formulation costs and the cost–benefit ratio, particularly in comparison with conventional additives.

6. Bioavailability, Stability, Safety and Formulation Strategies for the Veterinary Use of C. longa-Derived Products

6.1. Why Bioavailability Remains a Major Limitation for Translation into Veterinary Medicine

Curcumin is characterised by low oral bioavailability, and this limitation may contribute to variability in systemic exposure and difficulties in reproducing systemic effects in clinical studies. Based on a single methodological analysis, it was reported that the systematic reviews evaluated in that study did not always adequately account for differences in bioavailability among curcumin formulations, for example, through stratification or sensitivity analyses. Therefore, this observation should be interpreted within the context of that specific study and may indicate a possible source of heterogeneity in the interpretation of clinical evidence [58]. A pharmacokinetic study reported that after oral administration, plasma concentrations of unconjugated curcumin remain very low, even at high doses and in formulations marketed as having enhanced absorption. In the same study, co-administration with piperine did not result in a measurable increase in systemic exposure to unconjugated curcumin under the evaluated conditions. These findings suggest that the so-called bioenhancer effect should not be assumed to be constant across contexts, and its extrapolation as a universal solution requires caution and empirical confirmation, particularly when the population, dose or target species changes [59].
It is crucial to emphasize that the limitations related to bioavailability and exposure variability do not concern isolated curcumin alone but may also affect the interpretation of results obtained with C. longa-based products, including standardized extracts or rhizome preparations, since the matrix and route of administration may influence the release and solubilisation of compounds in the gastrointestinal tract [58].

6.2. Chemical and Technological Stability, with Relevance for Feed Applications

Curcumin may undergo degradation under thermal treatment conditions, and the resulting degradation products may exhibit biological activity of their own, which may complicate the estimation of actual exposure and the “effective dose” in processed products. This observation has potential implications for applications in animal production, since feed processing steps such as conditioning and performance may involve high temperatures that could affect the stability of curcumin and the profile of compounds administered [60]. Microencapsulation is a technological strategy that has been investigated to protect curcumin and preserve its functional properties after moderate thermal stress [61]. In addition to temperature, storage stability is an important practical variable, and some nanoemulsion-based systems may improve stability over several weeks under storage conditions [62].
Consequently, in order to improve comparability among studies, it is important to report the characteristics of the products used, including aspects related to processing and storage, since these factors may influence chemical stability and biological exposure [58].

6.3. Strategies to Increase Bioaccessibility and Exposure

Formulations may increase oral exposure to curcuminoids by improving solubilisation and the processes that facilitate passage across the intestinal barrier, and this principle is supported by comparative absorption studies of different curcumin delivery systems. Several formulations have been evaluated, including a phytosomal formulation and a formulation associated with volatile oils from the rhizome, with differences being reported in the appearance of curcuminoids in plasma compared with unformulated curcumin, based on analyses performed after enzymatic deconjugation of the samples [63]. From a methodological perspective, the findings of this study should be interpreted as a context-specific observation rather than as a general conclusion. They suggest that the matrix and delivery system may modify internal exposure to curcuminoids and may therefore influence the magnitude of the observed effect. This aspect should be considered with caution when interpreting veterinary studies, particularly when comparing conventional curcumin preparations with formulations designed to enhance absorption, such as those containing piperine [58]. In the field of animal nutrition, curcumin nanoformulations are discussed as an emerging option for increasing bioavailability and achieving more consistent effects in monogastric animals, poultry and fish [64]. In aquaculture, effects of nanocurcumin on performance and selected health indicators have been reported in red tilapia, including in the context of challenge with Aspergillus flavus [65]. With regard to improving bioaccessibility, curcumin-piperine complexes incorporated into nanoemulsions stabilized with phospholipids and whey protein have been evaluated, with improved storage stability and increased bioaccessibility under simulated gastrointestinal digestion conditions being reported, depending on the formulation [62].
At the same time, controlled pharmacokinetic data suggest that piperine does not necessarily increase systemic exposure to unconjugated curcumin under the evaluated conditions and, therefore, presenting piperine as a universally valid solution requires caution and species-specific confirmation [59].

6.4. Safety and Toxicological Considerations in Target Species

Curcumin and preparations derived from C. longa are generally considered to have a favourable safety profile, with low toxicity reported in experimental and clinical studies [66,67]. Experimental studies indicate good tolerability at moderate levels of supplementation. Doses of approximately 200 mg/kg feed in broiler chickens, 200 mg/kg diet in growing pigs, 100 mg/kg diet in marine fish and 50 to 200 mg/kg diet for curcumin or nano-curcumin in tilapia have been reported without evidence of major clinical adverse effects under the experimental conditions evaluated [68,69,70,71]. The assessment carried out by the EFSA FEEDAP Panel indicates that preparations derived from turmeric are safe for target species when used in feed or drinking water at the proposed inclusion levels, generally expressed in mg/kg of feed or mg/L of water, depending on the type of preparation and species [72]. For example, extracts are considered safe at levels of approximately 15 mg/kg feed, supporting the controlled use of products derived from C. longa in animal nutrition. Data from applied poultry studies confirm these observations, with curcumin supplementation in the range of 100 to 200 mg/kg feed being associated with improved productive performance, antioxidant status and certain metabolic parameters, without the reporting of major clinical adverse effects under the experimental conditions evaluated [68,73]. These findings suggest that the use of curcumin at moderate doses is generally well tolerated.
However, safety may be influenced by factors such as dose, duration of administration, type of formulation and species-specific metabolism [66]. High levels or long-term administration may induce physiological or metabolic changes, although evidence regarding clinically relevant toxicity remains limited. Although adverse effects are considered rare at usual supplementation levels, some studies suggest possible effects at high doses; however, these observations are dose-dependent, influenced by experimental conditions and not consistent across studies. The interpretation of results is further complicated by the frequent use of multicomponent formulations, in which curcumin is combined with other bioactive compounds, making it difficult to attribute the observed effects exclusively to curcumin. In addition, strategies designed to increase bioavailability, such as nanoformulations or combinations with absorption-enhancing agents, may modify systemic exposure and, consequently, influence the safety profile, requiring careful toxicological evaluation. Overall, current evidence supports a favourable safety profile for products derived from C. longa in target species when used at appropriate doses. Nevertheless, further studies are required to define optimal dosage ranges, evaluate long-term safety and identify any species-specific adverse effects under real production conditions.

6.5. Food Safety and Consumer Health Considerations

From the perspective of food safety, the pharmacokinetic profile of curcumin is characterised by low oral bioavailability and rapid metabolism. These properties are reflected in reduced plasma levels of curcumin, even following oral administration at relatively high doses, indicating limited systemic exposure [66]. This reduced exposure may indirectly influence the potential transfer of compounds into edible tissues. Consequently, the accumulation of curcumin in meat, milk or eggs is likely to be limited, although direct evidence in food-producing animals remains insufficient. In this context, low bioavailability may be considered a favourable characteristic from a food safety perspective, as it could reduce the likelihood of the persistence of significant residues. However, this interpretation is based mainly on indirect pharmacokinetic data, in the absence of systematic studies specifically dedicated to residue assessment. This aspect becomes even more relevant in the context of the increasingly frequent use of phytogenic additives in the diets of animals intended for food production [66].
Curcumin is generally considered to have a favourable safety profile, with low toxicity reported in both experimental and clinical studies, and has been assessed as safe under established conditions of use. The FEEDAP assessment indicates that preparations derived from C. longa are safe for target species and do not pose a risk to consumers when used at the recommended levels. However, compliance with these limits is essential, as high intakes may exceed the values considered safe in risk assessments [72].
At present, studies specifically addressing residue kinetics, tissue distribution and long-term exposure through food products of animal origin are limited. In addition, variability in formulation, dose, duration of administration and species-specific metabolism may influence systemic exposure and the potential presence of metabolites in edible tissues, aspects that are consistent with general observations regarding the variability of systemic exposure to curcumin [66]. Therefore, although the current evidence suggests a low risk of accumulation and a favourable safety profile, definitive conclusions regarding consumer safety cannot yet be formulated. Further studies are needed to characterise residue levels, metabolic fate and possible regulatory thresholds in food-producing animals in order to support the safe and standardised use of products derived from C. longa. These aspects are particularly relevant in the context of the growing interest in the use of phytogenic additives in animal production systems intended for human consumption.

6.6. Recommendations for Reporting, Comparability and Translation

For comparability among studies, clear reporting of the type of curcumin-based product used and its chemical characterization, for example, curcuminoid content and degree of standardization, is essential, since differences among products are often insufficiently integrated into existing syntheses [58]. For advanced formulations, detailed characterization of the system, for example, particle size and stability, as well as parameters related to compound loading, is important for critical evaluation and comparability among studies, particularly when nano-systems are discussed as strategies to improve bioavailability [64]. For processed feeds, temperature conditions and processing time should be explicitly reported, since heat exposure may induce degradation and changes in the chemical profile, with a potential impact on biological activity [60]. When evaluating claims related to bioavailability, it is important to specify whether the reported values refer to unconjugated curcumin or its conjugates because this distinction may influence the interpretation of systemic exposure [59].
In addition, strategies aimed at increasing exposure should be discussed together with potential safety implications and interactions, since altered exposure may affect the risk-benefit profile, particularly in animals [73].

7. Methodological Limitations and Future Directions

The interpretation of results regarding the use of C. longa and curcumin in veterinary medicine is limited by the variability of the products used, including rhizome powder, standardised extracts, liposomal formulations, nanoformulations and multicomponent products, differences that influence the comparability and reproducibility of studies. The lack of standardisation represents a major issue, as variations in phytochemical composition, curcuminoid content, form of administration and dosage may affect the comparability of results across studies [57,66]. Future studies should clearly report the type of product used, the active substance content, the dose expressed both as total product and as active principle, the duration and route of administration, and the use of standardised control groups that are comparable across studies in order to allow a rigorous and reproducible evaluation of results [66,72]. Although advanced formulations, such as liposomal systems and nanoformulations, may improve systemic exposure, the available data do not include sufficient standardised direct comparisons between these forms and conventional formulations. In general, improved formulations appear to offer advantages in terms of bioavailability; however, these benefits are not always consistently reflected in biological outcomes, and their superiority over conventional forms remains dependent on the species and experimental context.
In addition, many veterinary studies use multicomponent products, which limits the ability to attribute the observed effects exclusively to curcumin or preparations derived from C. longa [47,53]. Furthermore, variations in formulation, including the use of liposomal systems or other modified forms, may influence the biological response and complicate the comparative interpretation of results [54]. This issue is particularly relevant in animal studies, where curcumin is frequently administered in combination with other bioactive substances, such as collagen, green tea, glucosamine or chondroitin [5,52]. In ruminants, the use of phytogenic mixtures that include turmeric extracts alongside essential oils or tannins has also been reported, which may complicate the interpretation of individual effects [47]. Therefore, future research should include experimental designs that allow a clear differentiation between the effects of curcumin and those of complex formulations, including through the use of appropriate comparative groups. For practical applicability, standardised protocols, the evaluation of dose–response relationships and the integration of pharmacokinetic data are required [66,72]. In addition, the assessment of the cost–benefit ratio under real production or clinical use conditions represents an important aspect that requires further investigation.

8. Conclusions

Curcumin and products derived from C. longa represent promising phytogenic resources for veterinary medicine and animal production due to their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial and immunomodulatory properties. These properties have been demonstrated through beneficial effects on productive performance, oxidative status, intestinal health and immune response in multiple animal species, thereby constituting an important strength and supporting interest in their use as alternatives to conventional antimicrobials. However, their practical applicability is limited by several weaknesses, particularly low oral bioavailability, the lack of extract standardisation and the considerable variability in doses and experimental protocols, which make it difficult to compare results and formulate clear veterinary recommendations. At the same time, relevant opportunities exist in relation to the development of advanced formulations, such as nano- and liposomal systems, and the integration of curcumin into modern nutritional strategies aimed at supporting health and reducing antimicrobial use. Nevertheless, these prospects are accompanied by certain threats, including the costs associated with innovative formulations, the lack of large-scale clinical studies, regulatory difficulties and the risk of unjustified extrapolation of results between species. Overall, although curcumin shows considerable potential as a nutritional and therapeutic adjuvant, the validation of its clinical use requires well-designed in vivo studies, product standardisation, and the evaluation of dose–response relationships and the cost–benefit ratio under real production conditions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.-L.A. and E.D.; methodology, M.-L.A.; software, A.O.D.; validation, R.T.C., F.M. and E.D.; formal analysis, B.F.; investigation, M.-L.A.; writing—original draft preparation, M.-L.A.; writing—review and editing, M.-L.A.; supervision, E.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The publication of the present paper was supported by the University of Life Sciences “King Mihai I” from Timișoara, Romania.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Doctoral School “Veterinary Medicine”, University of Life Sciences “King Mihai I” from Timişoara (Calea Aradului 119, 300645 Timişoara, Romania), for the academic support and resources provided throughout the development of this research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

DNADeoxyribonucleic acid
CpDNAChloroplast DNA
HPLCHigh-Performance Liquid Chromatography
HPLC-MS/MSHigh-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry
Keap1Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1
Nrf2Nuclear factor erythroid 2–related factor 2
AREAntioxidant Response Element
HO-1Heme oxygenase-1
NQO1Quinone oxidoreductase 1
NF-κBNuclear factor kappa B
COXCyclooxygenase
iNOSInducible Nitric Oxide Synthase
NLRP3The NOD-like receptor (NLR) family, the pyrin domain containing 3
THP-1Monocytic cell line
PMAPhorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate
IL-1βInterleukin-1 beta
TLR4Toll-like receptor 4
MyD88Myeloid Differentiation Primary Response 88
P2X7RPurinergic 2X7 receptor
AFB1Aflatoxin B1
CURCurcumin
IUGRIntrauterine growth restriction
NBWNormal-birth-weight
OTAOchratoxin A
MMP-3Matrix metalloproteinase-3
TNF-αTumour necrosis factor alpha
EPAEicosapentaenoic acid
DHADocosahexaenoic acid
LPSLipopolysaccharide

References

  1. Aggarwal, B.B.; Harikumar, K.B. Potential therapeutic effects of curcumin, the anti-inflammatory agent, against neurodegenerative, cardiovascular, pulmonary, metabolic, autoimmune and neoplastic diseases. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2009, 41, 40–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  2. Wang, J.; Deng, L.; Chen, M.; Che, Y.; Li, L.; Zhu, L.; Chen, G.; Feng, T. Phytogenic feed additives as natural antibiotic alternatives in animal health and production: A review of the literature of the last decade. Anim. Nutr. 2024, 17, 244–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  3. Llano, S.M.; Gómez, A.M.; Duarte-Correa, Y. Effect of drying methods and processing conditions on the quality of Curcuma longa powder. Processes 2022, 10, 702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  4. Hewlings, S.J.; Kalman, D.S. Curcumin: A review of its effects on human health. Foods 2017, 6, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  5. Comblain, F.; Barthélémy, N.; Lefèbvre, M.; Schwartz, C.; Lesponne, I.; Serisier, S.; Feugier, A.; Balligand, M.; Henrotin, Y. A randomized, double-blind, prospective, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy of a diet supplemented with curcuminoids extract, hydrolyzed collagen and green tea extract in owner’s dogs with osteoarthritis. BMC Vet. Res. 2017, 13, 395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  6. Dei Cas, M.; Ghidoni, R. Dietary curcumin: Correlation between bioavailability and health potential. Nutrients 2019, 11, 2147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  7. Hernández-García, P.A.; Granados-Rivera, L.D.; Orzuna-Orzuna, J.F.; Vázquez-Silva, G.; Díaz-Galván, C.; Razo-Ortíz, P.B. Meta-analysis of dietary curcumin supplementation in broiler chickens: Growth performance, antioxidant status, intestinal morphology, and meat quality. Antioxidants 2025, 14, 460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  8. Ashry, A.M.; Hassan, A.M.; Habiba, M.M.; El-Zayat, A.; El-Sharnouby, M.E.; Sewilam, H.; Dawood, M.A.O. The impact of dietary curcumin on the growth performance, intestinal antibacterial capacity, and haemato-biochemical parameters of gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata). Animals 2021, 11, 1779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  9. Bertoncini-Silva, C.; Vlad, A.; Ricciarelli, R.; Fassini, P.G.; Suen, V.M.M.; Zingg, J.-M. Enhancing the bioavailability and bioactivity of curcumin for disease prevention and treatment. Antioxidants 2024, 13, 331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  10. Liang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Deng, J.; Gao, G.; Ding, C.; Zhang, L.; Yang, R. The complete chloroplast genome sequences of 14 Curcuma species: Insights into genome evolution and phylogenetic relationships within Zingiberales. Front. Genet. 2020, 11, 802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  11. Chen, M.; Sun, J.; Yao, H.; Gong, F.; Cai, L.; Wang, C.; Shao, Q.; Wang, Z. Analysis of genetic and chemical variability of five Curcuma species based on DNA barcoding and HPLC fingerprints. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1229041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  12. Skopalíková, J.; Leong-Škorničková, J.; Šída, O.; Newman, M.; Chumová, Z.; Zeisek, V.; Jarolímová, V.; Poulsen, A.D.; Dantas-Queiroz, M.V.; Fér, T.; et al. Ancient hybridization in Curcuma (Zingiberaceae): Accelerator or brake in lineage diversification? Plant J. 2023, 116, 773–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  13. Chakraborty, A.; Mahajan, S.; Jaiswal, S.K.; Sharma, V.K. Genome sequencing of turmeric provides evolutionary insights into its medicinal properties. Commun. Biol. 2021, 4, 1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  14. Liao, X.; Xie, D.; Bao, T.; Hao, M.; Li, C.; Nie, B.; Sun, S.; Peng, D.; Hu, H.; Wang, H.; et al. Inversions encounter relaxed genetic constraints and balance birth and death of TPS genes in Curcuma. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 9349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  15. Ibáñez, M.D.; Blázquez, M.A. Curcuma longa L. rhizome essential oil: From extraction to its agri-food applications. A Review. Plants 2021, 10, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  16. Poudel, D.K.; Ojha, P.K.; Rokaya, A.; Satyal, R.; Satyal, P.; Setzer, W.N. Analysis of volatile constituents in Curcuma species, viz. C. aeruginosa, C. zedoaria, and C. longa, from Nepal. Plants 2022, 11, 1932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  17. Dudekula, M.V.; Kandasamy, V.; Balaraman, S.S.; Selvamani, S.B.; Muthurajan, R.; Adhimoolam, K.; Manoharan, B.; Natesan, S. Unlocking the genetic diversity of Indian turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) germplasm based on rhizome yield traits and curcuminoids. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 1036592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  18. Tian, W.W.; Liu, L.; Chen, P.; Yu, D.M.; Li, Q.M.; Hua, H.; Zhao, J.N. Curcuma longa (turmeric): From traditional applications to modern plant medicine research hotspots. Chin. Med. 2025, 20, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  19. Setzer, W.N.; Duong, L.; Poudel, A.; Mentreddy, S.R. Variation in the chemical composition of five varieties of Curcuma longa rhizome essential oils cultivated in North Alabama. Foods 2021, 10, 212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  20. Espinoza, J.P.; Guajardo, V.; Rodríguez-Díaz, M.; Moreno, M.; Klagges, C.; Castillo-Ruiz, M.; Otero, M.C. Pharmacological insights and technological innovations in Curcuma longa L. and Echinacea purpurea Moench as plant-derived immunomodulators. Pharmaceuticals 2026, 19, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  21. Akbar, A.; Kuanar, A.; Joshi, R.K.; Sandeep, I.S.; Mohanty, S.; Naik, P.K.; Mishra, A.; Nayak, S. Development of prediction model and experimental validation in predicting the curcumin content of turmeric (Curcuma longa L.). Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  22. Budhathoki, R.; Timilsina, A.P.; Regmi, B.P.; Sharma, K.R.; Aryal, N.; Parajuli, N. Metabolome mining of Curcuma longa L. using HPLC–MS/MS and molecular networking. Metabolites 2023, 13, 898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  23. Núñez, N.; Vidal-Casanella, O.; Sentellas, S.; Saurina, J.; Núñez, O. Characterization, classification and authentication of turmeric and curry samples by targeted LC–HRMS polyphenolic and curcuminoid profiling and chemometrics. Molecules 2020, 25, 2942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  24. Ungurianu, A.; Zanfirescu, A.; Margină, D. Regulation of gene expression through food: Curcumin as a sirtuin activity modulator. Plants 2022, 11, 1741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  25. PubChem. Curcumin; CID 969516. Available online: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/969516 (accessed on 2 March 2026).
  26. Jovanović, J.; Jović, M.; Trifković, J.; Smiljanić, K.; Gašić, U.; Krstić Ristivojević, M.; Ristivojević, P. Green extraction of bioactives from Curcuma longa using natural deep eutectic solvents: Unlocking antioxidative, antimicrobial, antidiabetic, and skin depigmentation potentials. Plants 2025, 14, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  27. Yin, Y.; Xie, X.; Zhou, L.; Yin, X.; Guo, S.; Zhou, X.; Li, Q.; Shi, X.; Peng, C.; Gao, J. A chromosome-scale genome assembly of turmeric provides insights into curcumin biosynthesis and tuber formation mechanism. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 1003835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  28. Aguilera, E.C.; Vachon, A.; Plourde, M. Comparative pharmacokinetics of curcuminoid formulations with an omega-3 fatty acid monoglyceride carrier: A randomized cross-over triple-blind study. Nutrients 2022, 14, 5347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  29. Orellana-Paucar, A.M. Turmeric essential oil constituents as potential drug candidates: A comprehensive overview of their individual bioactivities. Molecules 2024, 29, 4210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  30. Jabborova, D.; Choudhary, R.; Karunakaran, R.; Ercisli, S.; Ahlawat, J.; Sulaymanov, K.; Azimov, A.; Jabbarov, Z. The chemical element composition of turmeric grown in soil–climate conditions of the Tashkent region, Uzbekistan. Plants 2021, 10, 1426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  31. Khan, S.; Ambika; Rani, K.; Sharma, S.; Kumar, A.; Singh, S.; Thapliyal, M.; Rawat, P.; Thakur, A.; Pandey, S.; et al. Rhizobacterial mediated interactions in Curcuma longa for plant growth and enhanced crop productivity: A systematic review. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1231676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  32. Ghafouri-Fard, S.; Shoorei, H.; Bahroudi, Z.; Hussen, B.M.; Talebi, S.F.; Taheri, M.; Ayatollahi, S.A. Nrf2-related therapeutic effects of curcumin in different disorders. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  33. Cui, J.; Li, H.; Zhang, T.; Lin, F.; Chen, M.; Zhang, G.; Feng, Z. Research progress on the mechanism of curcumin anti-oxidative stress based on signaling pathways. Front. Pharmacol. 2025, 16, 1548073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  34. Rahaman, M.M.; Rakib, A.; Mitra, S.; Tareq, A.M.; Emran, T.B.; Shahid-Ud-Daula, A.F.M.; Amin, M.N.; Simal-Gandara, J. The genus Curcuma and inflammation: Overview of the pharmacological perspectives. Plants 2021, 10, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  35. Kong, F.; Ye, B.; Cao, J.; Cai, X.; Lin, L.; Huang, S.; Huang, W.; Huang, Z. Curcumin represses NLRP3 inflammasome activation via TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB and P2X7R signaling in PMA-induced macrophages. Front. Pharmacol. 2016, 7, 369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  36. Praditya, D.; Kirchhoff, L.; Brüning, J.; Rachmawati, H.; Steinmann, J.; Steinmann, E. Anti-infective properties of the golden spice curcumin. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  37. Tabanelli, R.; Brogi, S.; Calderone, V. Improving curcumin bioavailability: Current strategies and future perspectives. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 1715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  38. Shen, L.; Liu, C.C.; An, C.Y.; Ji, H.F. How does curcumin work with poor bioavailability? Clues from experimental and theoretical studies. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 20872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  39. Yuandani; Jantan, I.; Rohani, A.S.; Sumantri, I.B. Immunomodulatory effects and mechanisms of Curcuma species and their bioactive compounds: A review. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 643119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  40. Uvaniskanova, Z.; Hafez-Ghoran, S.; Abdjan, M.I.; Mountessou, B.Y.G.; Taktaz, F.; Mulya, F.; Seitimova, G.A.; Choudhary, M.I. Anti-inflammatory activity-guided isolation and in silico validation of turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) phytochemicals. Foods 2025, 14, 4205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  41. Zhang, J.; Sun, X.; Chai, X.; Jiao, Y.; Sun, J.; Wang, S.; Yu, H.; Feng, X. Curcumin mitigates oxidative damage in broiler liver and ileum caused by aflatoxin B1-contaminated feed through the Nrf2 signaling pathway. Animals 2024, 14, 409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  42. Damiano, S.; Jarriyawattanachaikul, W.; Girolami, F.; Longobardi, C.; Nebbia, C.; Andretta, E.; Lauritano, C.; Dabbou, S.; Avantaggiato, G.; Schiavone, A.; et al. Curcumin supplementation protects broiler chickens against the renal oxidative stress induced by dietary exposure to low levels of aflatoxin B1. Front. Vet. Sci. 2022, 8, 822227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  43. Chen, Y.; Liu, L.; Yu, L.; Li, S.; Zhu, N.; You, J. Curcumin Supplementation Improves Growth Performance and Anticoccidial Index by Improving the Antioxidant Capacity, Inhibiting Inflammatory Responses, and Maintaining Intestinal Barrier Function in Eimeria tenella-Infected Broilers. Animals 2024, 14, 1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  44. Shi, L.; Xun, W.; Peng, W.; Hu, H.; Cao, T.; Hou, G. Effect of the single and combined use of curcumin and piperine on growth performance, intestinal barrier function and antioxidant capacity of weaned Wuzhishan piglets. Front. Vet. Sci. 2020, 7, 418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  45. Niu, Y.; He, J.; Ahmad, H.; Shen, M.; Zhao, Y.; Gan, Z.; Zhang, L.; Zhong, X.; Wang, C.; Wang, T. Dietary curcumin supplementation increases antioxidant capacity and upregulates Nrf2 and Hmox1 levels in the liver of piglets with intrauterine growth retardation. Nutrients 2019, 11, 2978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  46. Tian, G.; Zhang, X.; Hao, X.; Zhang, J. Effects of curcumin on growth performance, ruminal fermentation, rumen microbial protein synthesis and serum antioxidant capacity in housed growing lambs. Animals 2023, 13, 1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  47. de Mello, E.P.; Bajay, M.M.; dos Santos, T.L.; de Jesus, R.S.; Deolindo, G.L.; Nora, L.; Tortelli, M.A.; da Silva, G.B.; Manica, D.; Bagatini, M.D.; et al. A mixture of free and microencapsulated essential oils combined with turmeric and tannin in the diet of dairy cows: Effects on productive efficiency and animal health. Animals 2025, 15, 1588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  48. de Vitt, M.G.; Signor, M.H.; Corrêa, N.G.; Breancini, M.; Wolschick, G.J.; Klein, B.; Silva, L.E.L.; Wagner, R.; Jung, C.T.K.; Kozloski, G.V.; et al. Combination of phytoactives in the diet of lactating Jersey cows: Effects on productive efficiency, milk composition and quality, ruminal environment, and animal health. Animals 2024, 14, 2518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  49. Li, M.; Kong, Y.; Wu, X.; Guo, G.; Sun, L.; Lai, Y.; Zhang, J.; Niu, X.; Wang, G. Effects of dietary curcumin on growth performance, lipopolysaccharide-induced immune responses, oxidative stress and cell apoptosis in snakehead fish (Channa argus). Aquac. Rep. 2022, 22, 100981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  50. Eissa, E.S.H.; Awlya, O.F.; Abusudah, W.F.; Qadhi, A.H.; Abd El-Aziz, Y.M.; Rinthong, P.; Abdelnour, S.A.; Munir, M.B.; Eissa, M.E.H.; Sakr, S.E.S. Curcumin’s effects on growth indices, histological scores, blood metabolites, redox state, immunity and antioxidant-related genes of red tilapia (Oreochromis sp.). Aquac. Int. 2024, 32, 7031–7046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  51. Wu, L.; Zhao, P.; Wu, P.; Jiang, W.; Liu, Y.; Ren, H.; Jin, X.; Zhou, X.; Feng, L. Curcumin attenuates ochratoxin A and hypoxia co-induced liver injury in grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella) by dual targeting endoplasmic reticulum stress and apoptosis via reducing ROS content. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2024, 15, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  52. Zheng, E.; Cen, T.; Ma, Y.; Weng, Z.; Jiang, C.; Hou, L.; Leng, J.; Hu, C. A Nutritional Supplement Containing Curcumin C3 Complex, Glucosamine, and Chondroitin Alleviates Osteoarthritis in Mice and Canines. Vet. Sci. 2025, 12, 462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  53. Lefort-Holguin, M.; Delsart, A.; Otis, C.; Moreau, M.; Barbeau-Grégoire, M.; Mellet, F.; Biourge, V.; Lussier, B.; Pelletier, J.-P.; Martel-Pelletier, J.; et al. Efficacy and Safety of a Diet Enriched with EPA and DHA, Turmeric Extract and Hydrolysed Collagen in Management of Naturally Occurring Osteoarthritis in Cats: A Prospective, Randomised, Blinded, Placebo- and Time-Controlled Study. Animals 2024, 14, 3298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  54. Withers, S.S.; York, D.; Johnson, E.; Al-Nadaf, S.; Skorupski, K.A.; Rodriguez, C.O., Jr.; Burton, J.H.; Guerrero, T.; Sein, K.; Wittenburg, L.; et al. In Vitro and In Vivo Activity of Liposome Encapsulated Curcumin for Naturally Occurring Canine Cancers. Vet. Comp. Oncol. 2018, 16, 571–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  55. Ustun Alkan, F.; Anlas, C.; Cinar, S.; Yildirim, F.; Ustuner, O.; Bakirel, T.; Gurel, A. Effects of Curcumin in Combination with Cyclophosphamide on Canine Mammary Tumour Cell Lines. Vet. Med. 2014, 59, 553–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  56. Silva, T.O.d.; Calheiros, L.G.R.d.M.; Barbosa, F.; Morrone, F.B.; Rockenbach, L.; Lainetti, P.d.F.; Leis Filho, A.F.; Carvalho, M.d.; Fonseca-Alves, C.E.; Laufer Amorim, R. Antitumor Effect of Curcumin, D6 Turmeric, and Hydrochloride Mitoxantrone on Canine and Human Urothelial Cancer Cells. Animals 2025, 15, 1589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  57. Kępińska-Pacelik, J.; Biel, W. Turmeric and Curcumin-Health-Promoting Properties in Humans versus Dogs. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 14561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  58. Bučević Popović, V.; Karahmet Farhat, E.; Banjari, I.; Jeličić Kadić, A.; Puljak, L. Bioavailability of oral curcumin in systematic reviews: A methodological study. Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  59. Kroon, M.A.G.M.; van Laarhoven, H.W.M.; Swart, E.L.; van Tellingen, O.; Kemper, E.M. A pharmacokinetic study and critical reappraisal of curcumin formulations enhancing bioavailability. iScience 2025, 28, 112575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  60. Esatbeyoglu, T.; Ulbrich, K.; Rehberg, C.; Rohn, S.; Rimbach, G. Thermal stability, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity of curcumin and its degradation product 4-vinyl guaiacol. Food Funct. 2015, 6, 887–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  61. Huang, C.; Wang, S.; Yang, H. Evaluation of thermal effects on the bioactivity of curcumin microencapsulated with porous starch-based wall material using spray drying. Processes 2020, 8, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  62. Hernández-Hernández, M.J.; Beristain, C.I.; Jiménez-Fernández, M.; Bonilla-Zavaleta, E.; Pascual-Pineda, L.A.; Rascón-Díaz, M.P. Enhancing the bioaccessibility and stability of curcumin through the formation of curcumin–piperine complexes in delivery systems based on nanoemulsions stabilized with phospholipids and whey protein. Appl. Food Res. 2025, 5, 100730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  63. Jäger, R.; Lowery, R.P.; Calvanese, A.V.; Joy, J.M.; Purpura, M.; Wilson, J.M. Comparative absorption of curcumin formulations. Nutr. J. 2014, 13, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  64. Moniruzzaman, M.; Min, T. Curcumin, curcumin nanoparticles and curcumin nanospheres: A review on their pharmacodynamics based on monogastric farm animal, poultry and fish nutrition. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  65. Eissa, E.S.H.; Alaidaroos, B.A.; Jastaniah, S.D.; Munir, M.B.; Shafi, M.E.; Abd El-Aziz, Y.M.; Bazina, W.K.; Ibrahim, S.B.; Eissa, M.E.H.; Paolucci, M.; et al. Dietary effects of nano-curcumin on growth performances, body composition, blood parameters and histopathological alteration in red tilapia (Oreochromis sp.) challenged with Aspergillus flavus. Fishes 2023, 8, 208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  66. Gupta, S.C.; Patchva, S.; Aggarwal, B.B. Therapeutic Roles of Curcumin: Lessons Learned from Clinical Trials. AAPS J. 2013, 15, 195–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  67. Salah, A.S.; Ahmed-Farid, O.A.; Nassan, M.A.; El-Tarabany, M.S. Dietary Curcumin Improves Energy Metabolism, Brain Monoamines, Carcass Traits, Muscle Oxidative Stability and Fatty Acid Profile in Heat-Stressed Broiler Chickens. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  68. Yan, E.; Zhang, J.; Han, H.; Wu, J.; Gan, Z.; Wei, C.; Zhang, L.; Wang, C.; Wang, T. Curcumin Alleviates IUGR Jejunum Damage by Increasing Antioxidant Capacity through Nrf2/Keap1 Pathway in Growing Pigs. Animals 2020, 10, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  69. He, Y.; Fu, Z.; Dai, S.; Yu, G.; Ma, Z. Dietary Curcumin Supplementation Can Enhance Health and Resistance to Ammonia Stress in the Greater Amberjack (Seriola dumerili). Front. Mar. Sci. 2022, 9, 961783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  70. Abdel-Ghany, H.M.; El-Sisy, D.M.; Salem, M.E.S. A Comparative Study of Effects of Curcumin and Its Nanoparticles on The Growth, Immunity and Heat Stress Resistance of Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 2523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  71. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances Used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP); Bampidis, V.; Azimonti, G.; Bastos, M.L.; Christensen, H.; Durjava, M.K.; Kouba, M.; López-Alonso, M.; López Puente, S.; Marcon, F.; et al. Scientific Opinion on The Safety and Efficacy of Turmeric Extract, Turmeric Oil, Turmeric Oleoresin and Turmeric Tincture from Curcuma longa L. Rhizome When Used as Sensory Additives in Feed for All Animal Species. EFSA J. 2020, 18, 6146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  72. Hafez, M.H.; El-Kazaz, S.E.; Alharthi, B.; Ghamry, H.I.; Alshehri, M.A.; Sayed, S.; Shukry, M.; El-Sayed, Y.S. The Impact of Curcumin on Growth Performance, Growth-Related Gene Expression, Oxidative Stress, and Immunological Biomarkers in Broiler Chickens at Different Stocking Densities. Animals 2022, 12, 958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  73. Liu, S.; Liu, J.; He, L.; Liu, L.; Cheng, B.; Zhou, F.; Cao, D.; He, Y. A comprehensive review on the benefits and problems of curcumin with respect to human health. Molecules 2022, 27, 4400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.