You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
by
  • Bojian Jiang* and
  • M. Tariq Iqbal*

Reviewer 1: Anonymous Reviewer 2: Anonymous

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The introduction is too short. In fact, the description of the state of the art is almost absent.
The bibliographic references in the paper are insufficient.
The paper's contribution has not been sufficiently highlighted.

Author Response

Please see the attached word file.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Figure 20 should be offered two times (larger and smaller) possibly on the same place. 

My opinion is this is a good conference paper. Could be accepted.


Author Response

Please see the attached word file.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

the paper can be accepted