Skip to Content
ElectronicsElectronics
  • Feature Paper
  • Article
  • Open Access

20 September 2024

24 Pages

An Analysis of Research Trends for Using Artificial Intelligence in Cultural Heritage

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Transilvania University of Brasov, 29 Eroilor, 500036 Brasov, Romania

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) techniques have been increasingly applied in assisting various cultural heritage (CH)-related tasks. The aim of this study is to examine the research trends and current applications of AI in this vast domain. After obtaining a dataset from the Web of Science and Scopus databases, a scientometric analysis of research publications from 2019 to 2023 related to the use of AI in CH was conducted. The trending topics based on the author’s keywords were identified by using the ScientoPy v2.1.3 software. Through this approach, five main topics were identified: classification, computer vision, 3D reconstruction, recommender systems, and intangible cultural heritage. The analysis highlights the upward trend in publications in this field since 2019, indicating a growing interest in the application of AI techniques in CH. By analyzing the latest research in the field, it is observed that AI techniques are mostly applied to assist CH in the discovery, description, classification, and preservation tasks. The report gives insights into the main research areas and developing trends in the field of artificial intelligence and machine learning. The study offers important information about the key research areas and emerging trends related to using AI techniques in the CH field. This helps to recognize the potential, development, and increasing influence of these technologies within the CH domain. The findings of this study contribute to the future development of AI applications in CH, enabling professionals to use the advantages of these technologies.

1. Introduction

Artificial intelligence (AI) and its subfield machine learning (ML) techniques have been applied in various application fields, including cultural heritage (CH). Numerous AI applications have been developed for CH, such as automated historical document classification and knowledge extraction, automated 3D reconstruction, and identification of CH assets. These applications could be used to extract or generate information from a digitized CH object, manage digital heritage databases, or support the development of assisting tools for CH professionals.
Recent literature reviews studied various aspects of using AI techniques in CH. Several studies have examined ML techniques for assessing heritage building health conditions [1], point cloud data acquisition and semantic segmentation algorithms for CH [2], and damage detection and structural health monitoring in masonry structures [3]. Neural networks (NNs) and deep learning (DL) techniques have demonstrated potential in archaeology, specifically in reconstruction, remote sensing, and collection management [4]. Emerging techniques like Neural Radiance Fields (NeRFs) have been identified as effective in creating detailed 3D models of CH assets, especially those with challenging characteristics for traditional photogrammetry [5]. AI and subfield ML/DL techniques have also been used to significantly improve the performance of image-restoration methods [6], extract choreographic sequences from traditional dance [7], improve accessibility of museum and online CH content [8], and improve the management of archives [9]. Recently, ref. [10] explored how AI can enhance visitor interactions with cultural assets, focusing on techniques and tool integration.
In recent years, bibliometric analyses have been utilized often to determine the trends of research from publication [11], including in the intersection of AI and CH. For instance, the bibliometric analysis of AI and big data applications in CH and museum applications revealed that AI applications were peripheral to main keyword clusters, suggesting a need for further research [8]. Another study on Heritage Building Information Modeling (HBIM) shows a shift from conceptualization to multidisciplinary applications since 2017, with a recent focus on semiautomatic 3D modeling, heritage information systems, pilot studies, and virtual reality [12,13] identifies emerging trends in the field of relic tourism research by analyzing articles from the Web of Science database, with a particular focus on discovering key keywords and mapping out collaborative author networks within this scholarly literature.
Previous review studies have explored the potential opportunities for specific AI techniques or CH applications. Still, no comprehensive study has reviewed the main research trends on this technological advancement within the CH domain. The present study contributes to the field of CH in a number of unique directions. First, the present study explores the main emerging research trends of AI in CH by conducting scientometric analyses of the documents published since 2019 that have not been previously conducted at this scale in this field. Scientometric analysis is a quantitative method used to study scientific literature and research activities. Scientometric tools use algorithms to identify trends and patterns within a specific search criterion, such as author keywords [14]. This method allows for the identification of key areas where AI is making an important impact in CH, which is important for understanding the direction of technological advancements. Second, by examining recent applications and case studies the proposed study presents trending AI techniques for CH tasks, including discovery, description, classification, and preservation. Third, the study identifies advantages and challenges when using AI for CH applications, emphasizing research directions that require additional exploration.

2. Research Method

The dataset for this scientometric analysis was obtained through a search conducted on Clarivate Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus databases in January 2024. The databases selected for this study are widely recognized for their extensive coverage of metadata about documents related to the analyzed research field, including computer science, engineering, and cultural heritage studies [15]. The criteria used to include bibliographic sources were conference papers, articles, reviews, proceedings papers, and articles in press, all of them being relevant to AI applications in CH and published between 2019 and 2023. Exclusion criteria were applied to book chapters, editorials, letters, publications not directly related to AI applications in CH, and duplicate entries across Scopus and WoS databases. To retrieve a relevant bibliographic dataset that is related to the application of AI within the CH domain, two search queries were designed: “Artificial AND intelligence AND (Cultur* AND Heritage)” and “(Machine OR Deep) Learning AND (Cultur* AND Heritage)”. These queries were designed to capture a broad range of AI applications while maintaining specificity to cultural heritage contexts. During the query design process, I used OpenAI ChatGPT-4.0 (https://chat.openai.com/) to assist me with refining the queries. The timeframe chosen was limited to the period from 2019 to 2023 because that period covers the most recent developments in the applications of AI in the CH domain and provides sufficient data for trend analysis. The search was conducted without language restrictions to ensure a global perspective. But, due to the nature of the WoS and Scopus databases, the bibliographic dataset contains mostly English language publications. A substantial number of documents were retrieved after conducting a search using the chosen queries in both databases. The WoS database returned a total of 1323 documents that matched the specified search criteria. Similarly, the Scopus database returned 1269 documents relevant to the study’s focus. In the next step, the retrieved datasets were compiled and preprocessed into a single dataset for further analysis using ScientoPy v2.1.3 scientometric tool [14]. ScientoPy v2.1.3 is an open-source Python-based scientometric tool that merges data from different sources, performs temporal scientometric analysis for authors, institutions, and trending topics, and offers various visualization options for studies in emerging fields [14]. The preprocessing process includes title and author’s name normalization to exclude inconsistencies between WoS and Scopus, publication type filtering, and automatic duplicate removal based on DOI, publication normalized title, and first author’s last name. After merging datasets from the WoS and Scopus databases, and preprocessing the bibliographic sources, a total of 1702 unique entities were identified.

4. Conclusions

Substantial progress has been achieved in applying AI techniques across various areas of CH. This comprises applications ranging from the 3D reconstruction of heritage artifacts to music, dance, and historical text analysis. In this paper is presented an outline of research related to five emerging trends in using AI techniques in the field of CH. These emerging trends were identified using a scientometric analysis based on an advanced tool like ScientoPy v2.1.3 on a dataset of 1702 relevant articles gathered from Clarivate Web of Science and Scopus databases.
In many applications, AI techniques have proved to be beneficial compared to traditional methods in enhancing the digital transformation of the CH and increasing performance in data management, preservation, and sharing. AI automates damage detection, object recognition, data analysis, and 3D reconstruction. Also, the application of AI in CH extends from basic automation, reaching specialized domains that are improving understanding and interaction with cultural artifacts. In the field of damage detection and conservation of CH assets, advanced AI models such as CNNs, YOLO, and SVMs have demonstrated significant accuracy in identifying and classifying various types of damage in historical buildings and artifacts. These models can detect patterns of deterioration that might escape the human eye, enabling proactive conservation efforts. AI’s impact on digital archiving has been transformative. AI techniques facilitate access and understanding of CH documents through automated transcription, document restoration, and personalized recommendations. ML algorithms can automate the process of digitizing vast collections of documents, photographs, and audio recordings. Also, ML techniques can identify patterns and connections across massive datasets of artifacts, texts, and historical records. NLP techniques have made significant advances in automated transcription and translation of historical texts, making previously inaccessible documents available to a global audience. Also, AI improves CH preservation by enabling analysis of deterioration and virtual restoration of artworks. In the field of object recognition and 3D reconstruction, AI has enabled the creation of highly detailed digital models of artifacts and historical sites. DL models can reconstruct damaged or partially destroyed artifacts, improving understanding of their original form and function. AI technology facilitates the integration of CH into interactive Virtual/Augmented Reality environments, allowing for a more engaging and immersive experience for users, especially children and adolescents. AI algorithms can create personalized, context-aware AR overlays in museums, providing visitors with adapted information based on their interests and prior knowledge.
The application of AI in CH presents ethical considerations and potential limitations. Data privacy is an important ethical concern when using AI in CH. The digitization and analysis of cultural artifacts using AI-powered analysis tools often involve sensitive information (for example the provenance of objects, location data of archaeological sites, and personal details CH institutions individuals), which can be at risk of unauthorized access when used in AI systems that require large datasets. The use of AI in CH necessitates the implementation in CH Institutions of robust data protection measures and ethical guidelines to address privacy concerns [127]. Cultural sensitivity is another critical aspect that demands careful consideration when applying AI to Cultural Heritage. There is a risk, if AI algorithms are not properly designed and trained, of simplification or distortion of complex cultural contexts and nuances. To address these issues, the development of AI systems for CH applications can involve cultural experts and community representatives. The ethical implications of using AI-powered analysis tools include risks of dependence on technological interpretations of cultural artifacts. This may affect the use of traditional methods of analysis and cultural knowledge passed down through generations. Also, the use of AI in reconstructing or restoring artifacts may influence how the public understands recreated CH assets compared to the original ones, raising questions about the preservation of historical integrity.
Although this study adopted a comprehensive approach, there are several limitations and potential biases. The results of the study are limited to the publications indexed in the WoS and Scopus databases and contain a reduced number of non-English publications and research from developing countries. There is also a potential bias towards academic publications. Additionally, the study did not consider the latest advancements that are not yet included in the Web of Science and Scopus databases. Future research can build upon the existing foundation by integrating other databases and addressing broad subjects in a systematic literature review or meta-analysis.
Based on the analysis of current research trends and applications of AI in CH discussed in this article, several future research directions need further investigation. Further research is still needed to overcome some limitations of using these techniques in CH applications. AI techniques present lower performance on complex tasks like interpreting unclear damage areas or handling diverse CH objects. Although the automation of several CH tasks has made significant advances, human expertise remains necessary for interpreting difficult contexts, validating results, and guaranteeing the ethical application of these technologies in the CH field.
Addressing data limitations remains an important challenge in the application of AI to CH. Future research in cultural heritage AI should prioritize the development of comprehensive, open-source datasets that integrate diverse multimodal data sources such as high-resolution images, 3D models, and historical texts. These datasets will enable the training of more accurate AI models. In addition, developing hybrid AI models that integrate multimodal data sources and combine AI techniques with traditional methods can improve the performance of AI applications in complex cultural heritage tasks like interpreting unclear damaged areas or managing the diverse properties of cultural artifacts. This could involve also, the exploration of advanced ML techniques (for example few-shot learning and transfer learning) to improve performance on tasks with limited data. Enhancing human–AI collaboration is important for the successful integration of AI technologies in CH practices. Future studies should explore the development of AI systems that provide transparent explanations of the outputs and facilitate easier interpretation of AI-generated results by CH human experts. Ethical considerations and cultural sensitivity are important future research areas. This includes developing ethical standards for digitizing and interpreting CH content, as well as methods for involving local communities in the AI-driven preservation process. Lastly, future research should expand into underrepresented areas within the CH domain. This research direction involves exploring the potential of AI in preserving linguistic heritage, particularly endangered languages, as well as exploring its role in interactive storytelling for cultural education.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

I acknowledge the use of OpenAI ChatGPT-4.0 (https://chat.openai.com/) throughout the paper to improve the writing style, clarity, and consistency. Subsequently, I thoroughly reviewed and edited the content as necessary. Care was taken to ensure no copyright violations.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Mishra, M. Machine Learning Techniques for Structural Health Monitoring of Heritage Buildings: A State-of-the-art Review and Case Studies. J. Cult. Herit. 2021, 47, 227–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  2. Yang, S.; Hou, M.; Li, S. Three-dimensional Point Cloud Semantic Segmentation for Cultural Heritage: A Comprehensive Review. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  3. Soleymani, A.; Jahangir, H.; Nehdi, M.L. Damage Detection and Monitoring in Heritage Masonry Structures: Systematic Review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023, 397, 132402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  4. Barceló, J.; Del Castillo, F.; Kayikci, D.; Urbistondo, B. Neural Networks for Archaeological Classification and Typology: An overview. Eur. J. Post Class. Archaeol. 2022, 12, 7–32. [Google Scholar]
  5. Croce, V.; Caroti, G.; De Luca, L.; Piemonte, A.; Véron, P. Neural radiance fields (nerf): Review and Potential Applications to Digital Cultural Heritage. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2023, 48, 453–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  6. Liu, Z. Literature Review on Image Restoration. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2022, 2386, 012041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  7. Rallis, I.; Voulodimos, A.; Bakalos, N.; Protopapadakis, E.; Doulamis, N.; Doulamis, A. Machine Learning for Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Review of Techniques on Dance Analysis. In Visual Computing for Cultural Heritage; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 103–119. [Google Scholar]
  8. Zhao, M.; Wu, X.; Liao, H.-T.; Liu, Y. Exploring Research Fronts and Topics of Big Data and Artificial Intelligence Application for Cultural Heritage and Museum Research. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2020; p. 012036. [Google Scholar]
  9. Colavizza, G.; Blanke, T.; Jeurgens, C.; Noordegraaf, J. Archives and AI: An Overview of Current Debates and Future Perspectives. ACM J. Comput. Cult. Herit. (JOCCH) 2021, 15, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  10. Casillo, M.; Colace, F.; Gupta, B.B.; Lorusso, A.; Santaniello, D.; Valentino, C. The Role of AI in Improving Interaction with Cultural Heritage: An Overview. In Handbook of Research on AI and ML for Intelligent Machines and Systems; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2024; pp. 107–136. [Google Scholar]
  11. Münster, S.; Ioannides, M. A Scientific Community of Digital Heritage in Time And Space. In Proceedings of the 2015 Digital Heritage, Granada, Spain, 28 September–2 October 2015; pp. 267–274. [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhang, Z.; Zou, Y. Research Hotspots and Trends in Heritage Building Information Modeling: A Review Based on Citespace Analysis. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 2022, 9, 394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  13. Das, S.; Mondal, S.; Puri, V.; Vrana, V. Structural Review of Relics Tourism by Text Mining and Machine Learning. J. Tour. Herit. Serv. Mark. (JTHSM) 2022, 8, 25–34. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ruiz-Rosero, J.; Ramírez-González, G.; Viveros-Delgado, J. Software Survey: Scientopy, a Scientometric Tool for Topics Trend Analysis in Scientific Publications. Scientometrics 2019, 121, 1165–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  15. Pranckutė, R. Web of Science (Wos) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World. Publications 2021, 9, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  16. Voinea, G.-D.; Gîrbacia, F.; Duguleană, M.; Boboc, R.G.; Gheorghe, C. Mapping the Emergent Trends in Industrial Augmented Reality. Electronics 2023, 12, 1719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  17. Munoz-Ausecha, C.; Ruiz-Rosero, J.; Ramirez-Gonzalez, G. RFID Applications and Security Review. Computation 2021, 9, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  18. Ćosović, M.; Janković, R. CNN Classification of the Cultural Heritage Images. In Proceedings of the 2020 19th International Symposium INFOTEH-JAHORINA (INFOTEH), East Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina, 18–20 March 2020; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  19. Abed, M.H.; Al-Asfoor, M.; Hussain, Z.M. Architectural Heritage Images Classification Using Deep Learning with CNN. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Visual Pattern Extraction and Recognition for Cultural Heritage Understanding, Bari, Italy, 29 January 2020. [Google Scholar]
  20. Rehman, I.U.; Ali, Z.; Jan, Z.; Rashid, M.; Abbas, A.; Tariq, N. Deep Learning Empowered Classification of Augmented Cultural Heritage Images. In Proceedings of the VIPERC 2023: The 2nd International Conference on Visual Pattern Extraction and Recognition for Cultural Heritage Understanding, Zadar, Croatia, 25–26 September 2023. [Google Scholar]
  21. Gao, L.; Wu, Y.; Yang, T.; Zhang, X.; Zeng, Z.; Chan, C.K.D.; Chen, W. Research on Image Classification and Retrieval Using Deep Learning with Attention Mechanism on Diaspora Chinese Architectural Heritage in Jiangmen, China. Buildings 2023, 13, 275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  22. Wang, F.; Geng, S.; Zhang, D.; Zhou, M.; Nian, W.; Li, L. A Fine-Grained Classification Method of Thangka Image Based on Senet. In Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Cyberworlds (CW), Kanazawa, Japan, 27–29 September 2022; pp. 23–30. [Google Scholar]
  23. Wibawa, A.D.; Wicaksono, E.A.; Suryani, S.D.; Rumadi, R. Javanese Batik Image Classification using Self-Organizing Map. In Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Computer Science, Information Technology and Engineering (ICCoSITE), Jakarta, Indonesia, 16 February 2023; pp. 472–477. [Google Scholar]
  24. Prasomphan, S. Ensemble Classification Technique for Cultural Heritage Image. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning and Intelligent Communications, Wuzhou, China, 17–18 November 2021; pp. 17–27. [Google Scholar]
  25. Muhathir, M.; Khairina, N.; Karenina, R.; Barus, I.; Ula, M.; Sahputra, I. Preserving Cultural Heritage Through AI: Developing LeNet Architecture for Wayang Image Classification. (IJACSA) Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 2023, 14, 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  26. Barucci, A.; Cucci, C.; Franci, M.; Loschiavo, M.; Argenti, F. A Deep Learning Approach to Ancient Egyptian Hieroglyphs Classification. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 123438–123447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  27. Barucci, A.; Canfailla, C.; Cucci, C.; Forasassi, M.; Franci, M.; Guarducci, G.; Guidi, T.; Loschiavo, M.; Picollo, M.; Pini, R. Ancient Egyptian Hieroglyphs Segmentation and Classification with Convolutional Neural Networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference Florence Heri-Tech: The Future of Heritage Science and Technologies, Florence, Italy, 16–18 May 2022; pp. 126–139. [Google Scholar]
  28. Fidatama, M.I.; Bimantoro, F.; Nugraha, G.S.; Irmawati, B.; Dwiyansaputra, R. Recognition of Bima Script Handwriting Patterns Using the Local Binary Pattern Feature Extraction Method and K-Nearest Neighbour Classification Method. In AIP Conference Proceedings; AIP Publishing: Melville, NY, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  29. Mustiari, M.; Bimantoro, F.; Nugraha, G.S.; Husodo, A.Y. Bima Script Handwriting Pattern Recognition using Histogram of Oriented Gradients and Backpropagation Classification Method. In AIP Conference Proceedings; AIP Publishing: Melville, NY, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  30. Navarro, P.; Cintas, C.; Lucena, M.; Fuertes, J.M.; Delrieux, C.; Molinos, M. Learning Feature Representation of Iberian Ceramics with Automatic Classification Models. J. Cult. Herit. 2021, 48, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  31. Cascone, L.; Dondi, P.; Lombardi, L.; Narducci, F. Automatic Classification of Fresco Fragments: A Machine and Deep Learning Study. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Image Analysis and Processing, Lecce, Italy, 23–27 May 2022; pp. 701–712. [Google Scholar]
  32. Obeso, A.M.; Benois-Pineau, J.; Vázquez, M.G.; Acosta, A.R. Saliency-Based Selection of Visual Content for Deep Convolutional Neural Networks: Application to Architectural Style Classification. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2019, 78, 9553–9576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  33. Taoufiq, S.; Nagy, B.; Benedek, C. Hierarchynet: Hierarchical CNN-based Urban Building Classification. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 3794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  34. Marafini, F.; Betti, M.; Bartoli, G.; Zini, G.; Barontini, A.; Mendes, N. A Proposal of Classification for Machine-Learning Vibration-Based Damage Identification Methods. Mater. Res. Proc. 2023, 26, 593–598. [Google Scholar]
  35. Mehta, S.; Kukreja, V.; Gupta, A. Exploring the Efficacy of CNN and SVM Models for Automated Damage Severity Classification in Heritage Buildings. In Proceedings of the 2023 Second International Conference on Augmented Intelligence and Sustainable Systems (ICAISS), Trichy, India, 23–25 August 2023; pp. 252–257. [Google Scholar]
  36. Lee, J.; Yu, J. Automatic Surface Damage Classification Developed Based on Deep Learning for Wooden Architectural Heritage. ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2023, X-M-1-2023, 151–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  37. Roy, P.S.; Kukreja, V.; Jain, V.; Vats, S. Classification of Defective Intensity Levels of Paint in Heritage Buildings using the CNN-SVM Technique. In Proceedings of the 2023 5th International Conference on Inventive Research in Computing Applications (ICIRCA), Coimbatore, India, 3–5 August 2023; pp. 17–22. [Google Scholar]
  38. Rodrigues, F.; Cotella, V.; Rodrigues, H.; Rocha, E.; Freitas, F.; Matos, R. Application of Deep Learning Approach for the Classification of Buildings’ Degradation State. In A BIM Methodology. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 7403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  39. Fu, Q.; Hou, M.; Hua, W. Based on Improved Pointnet Automatic Classification Method of Grotto Temple Statues. ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2023, X-M-1-2023, 87–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  40. Pepe, M.; Alfio, V.S.; Costantino, D.; Scaringi, D. Data for 3D Reconstruction and Point Cloud Classification using Machine Learning in Cultural Heritage Environment. Data Brief 2022, 42, 108250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  41. Grilli, E.; Remondino, F. Classification of 3D Digital Heritage. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  42. Croce, V.; Manuel, A.; Caroti, G.; Piemonte, A.; De Luca, L.; Véron, P. Semi-Automatic Classification of Digital Heritage on the Aïoli Open Source 2D/3D Annotation Platform via Machine Learning and Deep Learning. J. Cult. Herit. 2023, 62, 187–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  43. Rani, C.J.; Devarakonda, N. An Effectual Classical Dance Pose Estimation and Classification System Employing Convolution Neural Network–Long Shortterm Memory (CNN-LSTM) Network for Video Sequences. Microprocess. Microsyst. 2022, 95, 104651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  44. Malavath, P.; Devarakonda, N. Natya Shastra: Deep Learning for Automatic Classification of Hand Mudra in Indian Classical Dance Videos. Rev. D’Intell. Artif. 2023, 37, 689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  45. Tiwari, R.G.; Gautam, V.; Trivedi, N.K. Heritage of India: Advanced Monuments Classification using Artificial Intelligence. In Proceedings of the 2023 3rd International Conference on Computing and Information Technology (ICCIT), Tabuk, Saudi Arabia, 13–14 September 2023; pp. 206–210. [Google Scholar]
  46. Chen, Q.; Zhao, W.; Wang, Q.; Zhao, Y. The Sustainable Development of Intangible Cultural Heritage with AI: Cantonese Opera Singing Genre Classification Based On Cogcnet Model In China. Sustainability 2022, 14, 2923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  47. Castellano, G.; Lella, E.; Vessio, G. Visual Link Retrieval and Knowledge Discovery in Painting Datasets. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2021, 80, 6599–6616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  48. Castellano, G.; Vessio, G. A brief Overview of Deep Learning Approaches to Pattern Extraction and Recognition in Paintings and Drawings. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Shanghai, China, 15–17 October 2021; pp. 487–501. [Google Scholar]
  49. Marinescu, M.-C.; Reshetnikov, A.; López, J.M. Improving Object Detection in Paintings Based on Time Contexts. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW), Sorrento, Italy, 17–20 November 2020; pp. 926–932. [Google Scholar]
  50. Pathak, R.; Saini, A.; Wadhwa, A.; Sharma, H.; Sangwan, D. An Object Detection Approach for Detecting Damages in Heritage Sites Using 3-D Point Clouds and 2-D Visual Data. J. Cult. Herit. 2021, 48, 74–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  51. Bacharidis, K.; Sarri, F.; Ragia, L. 3D Building Façade Reconstruction using Deep Learning. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2020, 9, 322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  52. Payntar, N.D.; Hsiao, W.-L.; Covey, R.A.; Grauman, K. Learning Patterns of Tourist Movement and Photography from Geotagged Photos at Archaeological Heritage Sites in Cuzco, Peru. Tour. Manag. 2021, 82, 104165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  53. Ferrato, A.; Limongelli, C.; Mezzini, M.; Sansonetti, G. Using Deep Learning for Collecting Data about Museum Visitor Behavior. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  54. Fenu, G.; Medvet, E.; Panfilo, D.; Pellegrino, F.A. Mosaic Images Segmentation using U-net. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Pattern Recognition Applications and Methods, Valletta, Malta, 22–24 February 2020; pp. 485–492. [Google Scholar]
  55. Condorelli, F. Processing Historical Photographs and Film Footage with Photogrammetry and Artificial Intelligence for Cultural Heritage Documentation and Virtual Reconstruction. ELCVIA Electron. Lett. Comput. Vis. Image Anal. 2020, 19, 11–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  56. Yang, X.; Zheng, L.; Chen, Y.; Feng, J.; Zheng, J. Recognition of Damage Types of Chinese Gray-Brick Ancient Buildings Based on Machine Learning—Taking the Macau World Heritage Buffer Zone as an example. Atmosphere 2023, 14, 346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  57. Lee, S.-Y.; Cho, H.-H. Damage Detection and Safety Diagnosis for Immovable Cultural Assets Using Deep Learning Framework. In Proceedings of the 2023 25th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT), Pyeongchang, Republic of Korea, 19–22 February 2023; pp. 310–313. [Google Scholar]
  58. Kwon, D.; Yu, J. Automatic Damage Detection of Stone Cultural Property Based on Deep Learning Algorithm. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2019, 42, 639–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  59. Li, J.; Wang, H.; Deng, Z.; Pan, M.; Chen, H. Restoration of Non-Structural Damaged Murals in Shenzhen Bao’an Based on a Generator–Discriminator Network. Herit. Sci. 2021, 9, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  60. Kumar, P.; Gupta, V. Restoration of Damaged Artworks Based on a Generative Adversarial Network. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2023, 82, 40967–40985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  61. Castiello, M.E.; Tonini, M. An Explorative Application of Random Forest Algorithm for Archaeological Predictive Modeling. A Swiss Case Study. J. Comput. Appl. Archaeol. 2021, 4, 110–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  62. Orengo, H.A.; Garcia-Molsosa, A. A Brave New World for Archaeological Survey: Automated Machine Learning-Based Potsherd Detection using High-Resolution Drone Imagery. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2019, 112, 105013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  63. Wang, Y.; Shi, X.; Oguchi, T. Archaeological Predictive Modeling Using Machine Learning and Statistical Methods for Japan and China. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2023, 12, 238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  64. Argyrou, A.; Agapiou, A. A Review of Artificial Intelligence and Remote Sensing For Archaeological Research. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 6000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  65. Stoean, R.; Ionescu, L.; Stoean, C.; Boicea, M.; Atencia, M.; Joya, G. A Deep Learning-Based Surrogate for the Xrf Approximation of Elemental Composition within Archaeological Artefacts before Restoration. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2021, 192, 2002–2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  66. Jain, N.; Sierra-Múnera, A.; Ehmueller, J.; Krestel, R. Generation of Training Data for Named Entity Recognition of Artworks. Semant. Web 2023, 14, 239–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  67. Moradi, M.; Ghorbani, R.; Sfarra, S.; Tax, D.M.; Zarouchas, D. A Spatiotemporal Deep Neural Network useful for Defect Identification and Reconstruction of Artworks using Infrared Thermography. Sensors 2022, 22, 9361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  68. Angheluţă, L.; Chiroşca, A. Physical Degradation Detection on Artwork Surface Polychromies using Deep Learning Models. Rom. Rep. Phys. 2020, 72, 805. [Google Scholar]
  69. El Makhfi, N. Handwritten Text Segmentation Approach in Historical Arabic Documents. In Embedded Systems and Artificial Intelligence: Proceedings of ESAI 2019, Fez, Morocco, 2–3 May 2019; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp. 645–654. [Google Scholar]
  70. Ferro, S.; Pelillo, M.; Traviglia, A. AI-Assisted Digitalisation of Historical Documents. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2023, 48, 557–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  71. Philips, J.; Tabrizi, N. Historical Document Processing: A Survey of Techniques, Tools, and Trends. In Proceedings of the 12th International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (IC3K 2020)—Volume 1: KDIR, Online, 2–4 November 2020; pp. 341–349. [Google Scholar]
  72. Ostertag, C.; Beurton-Aimar, M. Using Graph Neural Networks to Reconstruct Ancient Documents. In Proceedings of the Pattern Recognition. ICPR International Workshops and Challenges, Virtual Event, 10–15 January 2021; Proceedings, Part VII. Springer International Publishing: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021; pp. 39–53. [Google Scholar]
  73. Babić, R.J.; Amelio, A.; Draganov, I.R. Writer Identification From Historical Documents Using Ensemble Deep Learning Transfer Models. In Proceedings of the 2022 21st International Symposium INFOTEH-JAHORINA (INFOTEH), East Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina, 16–18 March 2022; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  74. Ángel García-Calderón, M.; García-Hernndez, R.; Ledeneva, Y. An Unsupervised Lower-Baseline Localization Method Based on Writing Style Features for Historical Documents. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 2020, 39, 2509–2520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  75. Kaneko, H.; Yoshizu, Y.; Ishibashi, R.; Meng, L. An Attempt at Zero-shot Ancient Documents Restoration Based on Diffusion Models. In Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Advanced Mechatronic Systems (ICAMechS), Melbourne, Australia, 4–7 September 2023; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  76. Colutto, S.; Kahle, P.; Guenter, H.; Muehlberger, G. Transkribus. A Platform for Automated Text Recognition and Searching of Historical Documents. In Proceedings of the 2019 15th International Conference on eScience (eScience), San Diego, CA, USA, 24–27 September 2019; pp. 463–466. [Google Scholar]
  77. Jaillant, L.; Caputo, A. Unlocking Digital Archives: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives on AI and Born-Digital Data. AI Soc. 2022, 37, 823–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  78. Tzouganatou, A. Openness and Privacy in Born-Digital Archives: Reflecting the Role of AI Development. AI Soc. 2022, 37, 991–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  79. Schleider, T.; Troncy, R. Zero-Shot Information Extraction to Enhance a Knowledge Graph Describing Silk Textiles. In Proceedings of the 5th Joint SIGHUM Workshop on Computational Linguistics for Cultural Heritage, Social Sciences, Humanities and Literature, Online, 11 November 2021; pp. 138–146. [Google Scholar]
  80. Stoean, C.; Bacanin, N.; Stoean, R.; Ionescu, L.; Alecsa, C.; Hotoleanu, M.; Atencia, M.; Joya, G. On Using Perceptual Loss within the U-Net Architecture for the Semantic Inpainting of Textile Artefacts with Traditional Motifs. In Proceedings of the 2022 24th International Symposium on Symbolic and Numeric Algorithms for Scientific Computing (SYNASC), Hagenberg/Linz, Austria, 12–15 September 2022; pp. 276–283. [Google Scholar]
  81. Ilies, D.C.; Zlatev, Z.; Ilies, A.; Zharas, B.; Pantea, E.; Hodor, N.; Indrie, L.; Turza, A.; Taghiyari, H.R.; Caciora, T. Interdisciplinary Research to Advance Digital Imagery and Natural Compounds for Eco-Cleaning and for Preserving Textile Cultural Heritage. Sensors 2022, 22, 4442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  82. Liu, M.; Zhou, B. Innovative Design of Chinese Traditional Textile Patterns Based on Conditional Generative Adversarial Network. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Virtual Event, 26 June–1 July 2022; pp. 234–245. [Google Scholar]
  83. Ch’ng, E.; Feng, P.; Yao, H.; Zeng, Z.; Cheng, D.; Cai, S. Balancing Performance and Effort in Deep Learning via the Fusion of Real and Synthetic Cultural Heritage Photogrammetry Training Sets. In Proceedings of the ICAART (1), Online, 4–6 February 2021; pp. 611–621. [Google Scholar]
  84. Condorelli, F. Image Retrieval for 3D Modelling of Architecture using AI and Photogrammetry. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2023, 48, 441–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  85. Niu, W.; Huang, X.; Jin, J.; Mao, Z.; Gong, Y.; Xu, J.; Zhao, J. Recognition Method of the main Object of Three-Dimensional Photogrammetric Modeling of Cultural Relics. Natl. Remote Sens. Bull. 2022, 25, 2409–2420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  86. Grilli, E.; Farella, E.M.; Torresani, A.; Remondino, F. Geometric Features Analysis for the Classification of Cultural Heritage Point Clouds. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2019, 42, 541–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  87. Gujski, L.; di Filippo, A.; Limongiello, M. Machine Learning Clustering for Point Clouds Optimisation via Feature Analysis in Cultural Heritage. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2022, 46, 245–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  88. Pellis, E.; Murtiyoso, A.; Masiero, A.; Tucci, G.; Betti, M.; Grussenmeyer, P. An Image-based Deep Learning Workflow for 3D Heritage Point Cloud Semantic Segmentation. In Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop 3D-ARCH “3D Virtual Reconstruction and Visualization of Complex Architectures”, Mantua, Italy, 2–4 March 2022; pp. 426–434. [Google Scholar]
  89. Cao, Y.; Scaioni, M. 3DLEB-Net: Label-Efficient Deep Learning-Based Semantic Segmentation of Building Point Clouds at Lod3 Level. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 8996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  90. Cao, Y.; Teruggi, S.; Fassi, F.; Scaioni, M. A Comprehensive Understanding f Machine Learning and Deep Learning Methods for 3d Architectural Cultural Heritage Point Cloud Semantic Segmentation. In Proceedings of the Italian Conference on Geomatics and Geospatial Technologies, Genova, Italy, 18–20 December 2022; pp. 329–341. [Google Scholar]
  91. Pellis, E.; Masiero, A.; Tucci, G.; Betti, M.; Grussenmeyer, P. Assembling an Image and Point Cloud Dataset for Heritage Building Semantic Segmentation. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2021, 46, 539–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  92. Musicco, A.; Galantucci, R.A.; Bruno, S.; Verdoscia, C.; Fatiguso, F. Automatic Point Cloud Segmentation for the Detection of Alterations on Historical Buildings Through an Unsupervised and Clustering-Based Machine Learning Approach. ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2021, 2, 129–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  93. Malinverni, E.S.; Pierdicca, R.; Paolanti, M.; Martini, M.; Morbidoni, C.; Matrone, F.; Lingua, A. Deep Learning for Semantic Segmentation of 3D Point Cloud. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2019, 42, 735–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  94. Haznedar, B.; Bayraktar, R.; Ozturk, A.E.; Arayici, Y. Implementing Pointnet for Point Cloud Segmentation in the Heritage Context. Herit. Sci. 2023, 11, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  95. Galanakis, D.; Maravelakis, E.; Pocobelli, D.P.; Vidakis, N.; Petousis, M.; Konstantaras, A.; Tsakoumaki, M. SVD-based Point Cloud 3D Stone by Stone Segmentation for Cultural Heritage Structural Analysis–The Case of the Apollo Temple at Delphi. J. Cult. Herit. 2023, 61, 177–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  96. Pierdicca, R.; Paolanti, M.; Matrone, F.; Martini, M.; Morbidoni, C.; Malinverni, E.S.; Frontoni, E.; Lingua, A.M. Point Cloud Semantic Segmentation using a Deep Learning Framework for Cultural Heritage. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  97. Foryś, P.; Sitnik, R.; Markiewicz, J.; Bunsch, E. Fast Adaptive Multimodal Feature Registration (FAMFR): An Effective High-Resolution Point Clouds Registration Workflow for Cultural Heritage Interiors. Herit. Sci. 2023, 11, 190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  98. Saiti, E.; Danelakis, A.; Theoharis, T. Cross-Time Registration of 3D Point Clouds. Comput. Graph. 2021, 99, 139–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  99. Tabib, R.A.; Kulkarni, S.; Kagalkar, A.; Hurakadli, V.; Ganapule, A.; Dhanakshirur, R.R.; Mudenagudi, U. Deep Learning-Based Filtering of Images For 3d Reconstruction of Heritage Sites. In Digital Techniques for Heritage Presentation and Preservation; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 147–156. [Google Scholar]
  100. Wang, Z.; Xiong, H. Analysis of the Application of Deep Learning in Model Reconstruction of Ancient Buildings. Adv. Multimed. 2022, 2022, 4273937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  101. Dou, J.; Qin, J.; Jin, Z.; Li, Z. Knowledge Graph Based on Domain Ontology and Natural Language Processing Technology for Chinese Intangible Cultural Heritage. J. Vis. Lang. Comput. 2018, 48, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  102. Bakalos, N.; Rallis, I.; Doulamis, N.; Doulamis, A.; Protopapadakis, E.; Voulodimos, A. Choreographic Pose Identification Using Convolutional Neural Networks. In Proceedings of the 2019 11th International Conference on Virtual Worlds and Games for Serious Applications (VS-Games), Vienna, Austria, 4–6 September 2019; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  103. Serra, L. Preservation of Mediterranean Intangible Cultural Heritage through Virtual Gaming and Informatics: The Case of Sardinian Mùrra. In Proceedings of the 14th International Multi-Conference on Society, Cybernetics and Informatics (IMSCI 2020), Online, 13–16 September 2020; pp. 94–98. [Google Scholar]
  104. Fugini, M.; Finocchi, J.; Rossi, E. Semantic Adaptive Enrichment of Cartography for Intangible Cultural Heritage and Citizen Journalism. In Proceedings of the Future of Information and Communication Conference, Berlin, Germany, 4–5 April 2022; pp. 173–185. [Google Scholar]
  105. Sotiropoulos, D.N.; Tsihrintzis, G.A.; Virvou, M.; Tsichrintzi, E.-A. Machine Learning in Intangible Cultural Analytics: The Case of Greek Songs’ Lyrics. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 33rd International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI), Washington, DC, USA, 1–3 November 2021; pp. 299–305. [Google Scholar]
  106. Do, T.-N.; Pham, N.-K.; Nguyen, H.-H.; Tabia, K.; Benferhat, S. Stacking of Svms for Classifying Intangible Cultural Heritage Images. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Science, Applied Mathematics and Applications, Hanoi, Vietnam, 19–20 December 2019; pp. 186–196. [Google Scholar]
  107. Zhang, X.; Jin, Y. A Method of Protecting Sensitive Information in Intangible Cultural Heritage Communication Network Based on Machine Learning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning for Cyber Security, Guangzhou, China, 2–4 December 2022; pp. 214–227. [Google Scholar]
  108. Zhu, L.; Pang, T. Research on Digital Platform Technology of Intangible Cultural Heritage in Beijing Section of Great Wall Cultural Belt. In Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Culture-Oriented Science and Technology (CoST), Lanzhou, China, 18–21 August 2022; pp. 426–430. [Google Scholar]
  109. Huang, L.; Song, Y. Intangible Cultural Heritage Management using Machine Learning Model: A Case Study of Northwest Folk Song Huaer. Sci. Program. 2022, 2022, 1383520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  110. Zhao, H. The Database Construction of Intangible Cultural Heritage Based on Artificial Intelligence. Math. Probl. Eng. 2022, 2022, 8576002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  111. Li, Q. Intelligent Intangible Cultural Heritage Innovation Platform under the Background of Big Data and Virtual Systems. In Proceedings of the 2022 Second International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Smart Energy (ICAIS), Coimbatore, India, 23–25 February 2022; pp. 560–563. [Google Scholar]
  112. Yang, Z.; Jia, X.; Zhang, X.; Tang, J. Interpretable Neural Symbol Learning Methods to Fuse Deep Learning Representation and Knowledge Graph: Zhejiang Cuisine Recipe Intangible Cultural Heritage Use Case. In Design Studies and Intelligence Engineering; IOS Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2023; pp. 53–61. [Google Scholar]
  113. Huang, W.; Zheng, J.; Chen, W. The Construction of Intelligent Education for Intangible Cultural Heritage into the Classroom. In Proceedings of the The International Conference on Natural Computation, Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery, Xi’an, China, 1–3 August 2020; pp. 1172–1181. [Google Scholar]
  114. Xu, Z.; Zou, D. Big Data Analysis Research on the Deep Integration of Intangible Cultural Heritage Inheritance and Art Design Education in Colleges and Universities. Mob. Inf. Syst. 2022, 2022, 1172405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  115. Pistola, T.; Diplaris, S.; Stentoumis, C.; Stathopoulos, E.A.; Loupas, G.; Mandilaras, T.; Kalantzis, G.; Kalisperakis, I.; Tellios, A.; Zavraka, D. Creating Immersive Experiences Based on Intangible Cultural Heritage. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Reality (ICIR), Piscataway, NJ, USA, 12–13 May 2021; pp. 17–24. [Google Scholar]
  116. Cui, J.; Fu, L. Multimedia Display of Wushu Intangible Cultural Heritage Based on Interactive System and Artificial Intelligence. Soft Comput. 2023, 27, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  117. Hu, R. Research on the Digital Protection Technology of Intangible Cultural Heritage Information under Computer Artificial Intelligence. In Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Computers, Information Processing and Advanced Education (CIPAE), Ottawa, ON, Canada, 26–28 August 2022; pp. 92–96. [Google Scholar]
  118. Yu, X.; Shan, W.; Ding, H.; Li, B. Research on Intangible Cultural Heritage Amusement Space Design from the Perspective of Artificial Intelligence. In Proceedings of the 2021 2nd International Conference on Intelligent Design (ICID), Xi’an, China, 19 October 2021; pp. 203–207. [Google Scholar]
  119. Pavlidis, G. Recommender Systems, Cultural Heritage Applications, and The Way Forward. J. Cult. Herit. 2019, 35, 183–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  120. Dam, N.A.K.; Le Dinh, T. A Literature Review of Recommender Systems for the Cultural Sector. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS 2020), Prague, Czech Republic, 5–7 May 2020; Volume 1, pp. 715–726. [Google Scholar]
  121. Ferrato, A.; Limongelli, C.; Mezzini, M.; Sansonetti, G. The META4RS Proposal: Museum Emotion and Tracking Analysis for Recommender Systems. In Proceedings of the Adjunct Proceedings of the 30th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization, Barcelona, Spain, 4–7 July 2022; pp. 406–409. [Google Scholar]
  122. Trichopoulos, G. Large Language Models for Cultural Heritage. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of the ACM Greek SIGCHI Chapter, Athens, Greece, 27–28 September 2023; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  123. Nafis, F.; Al Fararni, K.; Yahyaouy, A.; Aghoutane, B. An Approach Based on Machine Learning Algorithms for the Recommendation of Scientific Cultural Heritage Objects. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 2021, 12, 230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  124. Colace, F.; D’Arienzo, M.P.; Lorusso, A.; Lombardi, M.; Santaniello, D.; Valentino, C. A Novel Context Aware Paths Recommendation Approach for the Cultural Heritage Enhancement. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE International Conference on Smart Computing (SMARTCOMP), Nashville, TN, USA, 26–30 June 2023; pp. 273–278. [Google Scholar]
  125. Casillo, M.; Conte, D.; Lombardi, M.; Santaniello, D.; Valentino, C. Recommender System For Digital Storytelling: A Novel Approach to Enhance Cultural Heritage. In Proceedings of the Pattern Recognition. ICPR International Workshops and Challenges, Virtual Event,, 10–15 January 2021; Proceedings, Part VII. Springer International Publishing: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021; pp. 304–317. [Google Scholar]
  126. Su, X.; Sperlì, G.; Moscato, V.; Picariello, A.; Esposito, C.; Choi, C. An Edge Intelligence Empowered Recommender System Enabling Cultural Heritage Applications. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2019, 15, 4266–4275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  127. Arrieta, A.B.; Díaz-Rodríguez, N.; Ser, J.D.; Bennetot, A.; Tabik, S.; Barbado, A.; Garcia, S.; Gil-Lopez, S.; Molina, D.; Benjamins, R.; et al. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AI. Inf. Fusion 2019, 58, 82–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.