Next Article in Journal
Advances and Prospects in Advanced Materials for Electrocatalysis and Energy Storage
Next Article in Special Issue
Influence of Voltage on the Microstructure and Tribocorrosion Properties of Porous Coatings Produced by Micro-Arc Oxidation
Previous Article in Journal
Surface Potential Decay Characteristics and Trap Regulation Mechanism of Epoxy Glass Fiber Under Low-Temperature Gradient
Previous Article in Special Issue
Microstructure, Elevated-Temperature Tribological Properties and Electrochemical Behavior of HVOF-Sprayed Composite Coatings with Varied NiCr/Cr3C2 Ratios and CoCrFeNiMo Additions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Research Progress of High-Entropy Ceramic Films via Arc Ion Plating

School of Materials and Chemistry, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2026, 16(1), 82; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings16010082
Submission received: 30 November 2025 / Revised: 30 December 2025 / Accepted: 5 January 2026 / Published: 9 January 2026

Abstract

High-entropy ceramic (HEC) thin films generally refer to multi-component solid solutions composed of multiple metallic and non-metallic elements, existing in forms such as carbides, nitrides, and borides. Benefiting from the high-entropy effect, lattice distortion, sluggish diffusion, and cocktail effect of high-entropy systems, HEC thin films form simple amorphous or nanocrystalline structures while exhibiting high hardness/elastic modulus, excellent tribological properties, and thermal stability. Although the mixing entropy increases with the number of elements in the system, a higher number of elements does not guarantee improved performance. In addition to system configuration, the regulation of preparation methods and processes is also a key factor in enhancing performance. Arc ion plating (AIP) has emerged as one of the mainstream techniques for fabricating high-entropy ceramic (HEC) thin films, which is attributed to its high ionization efficiency, flexible multi-target configuration, precise control over process parameters, and high deposition rate. Through rational design of the compositional system and optimization of key process parameters—such as the substrate bias voltage, gas flow rates, and arc current—HEC thin films with high hardness/toughness, wear resistance, high-temperature oxidation resistance, and electrochemical performance can be fabricated, and several of these properties can even be simultaneously achieved. Against the backdrop of AIP deposition, this review focuses on discussions grounded in the thermodynamic principles of high-entropy systems. It systematically discusses how process parameters influence the microstructure and, consequently, the mechanical, tribological, electrochemical, and high-temperature oxidation behaviors of HEC thin films under various complex service conditions. Finally, the review outlines prospective research directions for advancing the AIP-based synthesis of high-entropy ceramic coatings.

1. Introduction

High-entropy materials have emerged as a research hotspot in materials science, which is attributed to their multi-principal-element composition and unique properties. High-entropy ceramic (HEC) thin films, derived from high-entropy alloys [1] but containing five or more cations/anions (instead of pure metals) to form nitrides/borides/oxides, exhibit distinctive amorphous/nanocrystalline microstructures and superior performance (e.g., thermal stability, diffusion barrier capability, and balanced mechanical/tribological/corrosion properties) [2,3]. To realize their structural control and performance optimization, physical vapor deposition (PVD) dominates HEC fabrication, among which arc ion plating (AIP) is outstanding for its mature process, high deposition efficiency, and precise compositional tunability [4,5]. AIP enables simultaneous evaporation of multi-principal-element alloy targets (avoiding complex multi-target switching), achieves ~tens of nm/min deposition rates while maintaining densification, and suppresses large droplets via magnetic filtering/pulsed bias—key to improving HEC hardness–toughness synergy [6,7,8].
This review focuses on HEC thin films fabricated by AIP, with three core objectives: First, it systematically clarifies the thermodynamic mechanisms (high-entropy, lattice-distortion, sluggish-diffusion, and cocktail effects) governing HEC microstructural formation. Second, it elaborates how critical AIP parameters (substrate bias, reactive gas flow, arc current) regulate HEC microstructures (grain size, phase composition, density) and further tailor their mechanical, tribological, electrochemical, and high-temperature oxidation properties. Finally, it outlines prospective directions for advancing AIP-based HEC synthesis, such as multi-nonmetal sublattice design and integration with 2D materials. This work aims to provide a comprehensive “process–structure–property” framework for HEC thin film research and industrial applications.

2. High-Entropy Ceramic Systems and Their Thermodynamic Principles

Since the late twentieth century, alloy design philosophy has transitioned from a “single-principal-element” approach to a “multiple-principal-elements” strategy. The intrinsic driving force behind this shift is the enhanced thermodynamic stability achieved by maximizing the configurational entropy of multicomponent systems. In 1993, Greer and co-workers introduced the “confusion principle,” which states that increasing the number of constituent species raises the system’s configurational entropy, thereby suppressing intermetallic compound precipitation and promoting amorphous phase formation [9]. While the “confusion principle” focused on amorphous systems, Yeh and the Cantor group subsequently extended entropy-driven design to crystalline solid solutions by independently introducing the concept of “high-entropy alloys (HEAs)” in 2004. They proposed that when the configurational mixing entropy Δ S m i x 1.5   R , the alloy tends to form simple single-phase FCC (face-centered cubic) or BCC (body-centered cubic) structures, accompanied by severe lattice distortion and sluggish diffusion effects—collectively endowing the material with high strength, high hardness, and excellent softening resistance [1,10]. Additionally, the tunability of high-entropy materials—achieved by adjusting the number and concentration of constituent elements—enables the tailoring of mechanical, thermal, and functional properties [11].
In 2013, Otto and co-workers validated these concepts via multi-scale characterization techniques: scanning electron microscopy/electron backscatter diffraction (SEM/EBSD) for grain and twin evolution, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) for dislocation density quantification, and in situ neutron diffraction for lattice strain tracking during tensile loading of the CoCrFeMnNi alloy (77 K to 1073 K). Their results showed that the alloy retained a single-phase FCC structure without long-range ordering or secondary-phase precipitation, directly confirming the “entropy-stabilized single-phase” hypothesis. This work established the thermodynamic foundation that later supported the emergence of high-entropy ceramics [12,13]. Leveraging this foundation, Yeh et al. [14] extended the HEA concept to high-entropy ceramic systems in 2014, proposing a novel design paradigm: when five or more principal elements coexist at near-equimolar ratios, the high-entropy effect suppresses intermetallic formation and stabilizes simple solid solutions.
Building on this paradigm, combining four or more transition metals (e.g., Ti, Zr, Hf, Nb, Ta) with non-metallic elements (C, N, B) enables the synthesis of high-entropy ceramics with rock salt or wurtzite structures (e.g., nitrides, carbides, borides) [15,16,17]. This overturns the traditional “dominant principal element + minor dopants” design, enabling performance breakthroughs via synergistic near-equimolar composition. From a material system perspective, high-entropy ceramics cover nitride, carbide, oxide, and boride anion systems, with applications in high-temperature impact, marine corrosion, nuclear irradiation, lightweight structures, and flexible electronics [18,19].

2.1. High Entropy Effect

The high entropy effect describes the tendency of high-entropy systems—composed of multiple near-equimolar components—to form simple structures (e.g., solid solutions) instead of complex intermetallic compounds. Thermodynamically, mixing entropy significantly modulates Gibbs free energy (∆G), stabilizing disordered phases while suppressing ordered phase formation. Unlike traditional alloys, where high-proportion principal elements dominate and minor alloying elements readily form brittle intermetallic compounds or precipitates, the elevated mixing entropy in high-entropy systems reduces ∆G substantially. This renders disordered solid solutions (e.g., body-centered cubic, face-centered cubic, or rock salt structures) thermodynamically more stable than their ordered counterparts [5], as described by Equation (1).
G m i x = H m i x T S m i x
where G m i x : Gibbs free energy change of mixing, H m i x : enthalpy of mixing, T: absolute temperature, and S m i x : configurational (mixing) entropy. An increase in S m i x reduces G m i x , thereby stabilizing the solid solution phase. The configurational mixing entropy is quantified via the Boltzmann entropy relation:
S m i x = R N i = 1 x i l n x i
where R: universal gas constant, x i : atomic (mole) fraction of the i-th element, and N: total number of constituent elements. For equiatomic compositions ( x i = 1 N ), Equation (2) simplifies to the following:
S m i x = R l n N
Figure 1a presents the entropy-stability map of two-dimensional high-entropy materials (2D HEMs), tracking the evolution from 3D bulk high-entropy alloys (HEAs, 2004) to 3D high-entropy ceramics (HECs, post-2015) and finally to 2D HEMs (post-2020). These 2D systems (thickness < 5 nm, ≥5 distinct basal plane metals) have interfacial entropy densities that are three orders of magnitude higher than bulk, validating the “dimensional reduction” trajectory—lower dimensionality enhances surface/interfacial entropy density for entropy-driven stabilization at lower temperatures, which is critical for protective coatings and flexible electronics. Figure 1b schematically depicts the atomic scale formation of entropy-stabilized solid solutions as a continuous transition (dilution → interface formation → short-range ordering → entropy-stabilized solid solution), with composition/temperature/deposition rate tuning enabling ordered-to-disordered transformations to support the design of high-strength/toughness high-entropy thin films. Figure 1c clarifies the relationship between S m i x , atomic fractions, and N: low N leads to H m i x dominance (phase separation/intermetallics) while high N leads to ∆Smix dominance (single-phase solid solutions, shaded “entropy-stabilized zone”). Figure 1d illustrates the random distribution of metallic/non-metallic elements, linking high configurational entropy to material properties [20,21,22].

2.2. Lattice Distortion Effect

The lattice distortion effect, a hallmark of high-entropy materials (HEMs, including high-entropy alloys (HEAs) and high-entropy ceramics (HECs)), arises from atomic size mismatch and valence electron differences among multiple components. This induces local lattice stresses (compressive/tensile), twisting, or deformation, which microscopically correlate with HEMs’ mechanical, thermal, and electrical properties [25]. In HEAs, solute atom diffusion/clustering causes lattice distortion that acts as dislocation motion barriers—elevating strength/hardness by increasing dislocation bypass energy. Additionally, local stress fields absorb energy to delay crack propagation (improving toughness) and suppress ordered phases, stabilizing the solid solution structure.
He et al. [26] investigated lattice distortion in HEAs. Figure 2a verifies that disparities in atomic radius and valence electrons induce distortion, which enhances the mechanical properties via solid solution strengthening. Figure 2b shows that random element distribution causes heterogeneous interatomic interactions, generating local strains that alter atomic behavior and phase transformation, thereby affecting thermal stability and corrosion resistance—quantifying such distortion is essential for explaining the macroscopic performance. Figure 2c presents the special quasi-random structure (SQS) of FeCoCrNiMn HEA [27], with black arrows marking neighboring bonds related to interatomic interactions and properties. Figure 2d displays Mn-Mn bond statistics, where the consistency between theoretical predictions and experimental data validates the computational model and highlights local distortion’s role in regulating HEA performance. Stress concentrations from distortion affect strength and toughness, making its control critical for high-performance HEA design. Figure 2e compares the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of radial distribution functions (g(r)) for pure Ni and FeNiCrCoCu HEA [28]; the alloy’s larger FWHM directly demonstrates size mismatch-induced distortion. Figure 2f illustrates atomic size differences between the alloy and pure Ni, which induce lattice perturbations and stress fields to enhance solid solution strengthening (improving hardness and toughness). In HECs, lattice distortion further improves the structural stability by relieving internal stress and reducing formation/mixing enthalpies.

2.3. Sluggish Diffusion Effect

Thermal diffusivity is a key metric for evaluating heat transfer performance in high-entropy alloys (HEAs). The “sluggish diffusion effect”—prominent in high-entropy materials (HEMs, including HEAs and high-entropy ceramics (HECs))—arises from atomic size disparities (lengthening diffusion pathways) and random element distribution (creating complex chemical environments) under thermal activation. These factors increase atomic migration energy barriers, significantly reducing diffusion rates [29]. Sluggish diffusion primarily regulates phase transformation, high-temperature stability, and mechanical properties: diverse interelement bonding raises atomic jump activation energy [30,31], suppressing grain growth and phase transformations to retain high strength/hardness, enhance creep resistance, and extend service life, endowing HEMs with superior high-temperature stability.
Figure 3a,b compare (a) temperature-dependent thermal diffusivity of pure Al vs. an HEA and (b) Ni atom migration energy in pure metal, conventional alloy, and HEA matrices. The HEA exhibits consistently lower thermal diffusivity across all temperatures and higher atomic migration barriers than pure metals and traditional alloys, which are attributed to sluggish diffusion-induced intricate atomic interactions and convoluted diffusion pathways. These features enhance high-temperature thermal stability and creep resistance by mitigating thermal stresses/damage, though they may affect hot working and heat treatment, requiring balanced consideration in practical applications [32]. Figure 3c presents interdiffusion coefficients ( D i j ~ ) of Al, Co, Cr, and Ni (with Fe as reference) in FCC AlCoCrFeNi HEA after 46 h annealing at 1273 K, 1323 K, and 1373 K. Al shows the highest interdiffusion coefficient (attributed to its small atomic radius and high chemical activity). All elements exhibit temperature-dependent diffusion (coefficients increase with temperature), which is consistent with conventional behavior, indicating that HEA diffusion characteristics can be tuned via heat treatment—critical for processing and applications. Jiang et al. [33] demonstrated via first-principles calculations that high-entropy carbides (HfTaZrNb)C and (HfTaZrTi)C possess higher Gibbs free energies at elevated temperatures, exhibiting superior thermal/mechanical stability compared to conventional carbides. (HfTaZrNb)C offers strength advantages (higher bulk modulus) for engineering applications, while (HfTaZrTi)C (larger thermal expansion coefficient) is more suitable for coatings. Future research should explore the effects of composition and heat treatment on HEM performance to achieve rational design of high-performance stable materials.

2.4. Cocktail Effect

The “cocktail effect,” a core feature distinguishing high-entropy materials (HEMs) from traditional counterparts, refers to synergistic performance enhancement by multiple principal elements, exceeding the linear superposition of individual component properties. Originating from HEMs’ high mixing entropy, significant lattice distortion, and sluggish diffusion, its mechanisms involve atomic size mismatch, electronic structure modulation, and lattice strain—enabling precise control over microscopic phase composition, crystal orientation, and defect structures to form stable solid solutions with complex substructures [37]. Tokarewicz et al. [38] showed that AlCoCrFeNiCu alloy hardness increases with Al content, accompanied by phase evolution (FCC → FCC + BCC → BCC), along with enhanced strength and reduced ductility, demonstrating the nonlinear compositional effect on properties. When four or more cations/anions occupy lattice sites in near-equimolar ratios, interelement electronic interactions and lattice strain synergism are amplified. This endows HEMs with excellent thermodynamic stability and cooperative enhancements in macroscopic hardness, strength, and other functional properties, establishing a unique “composition–structure–property” relationship that underpins the design of high-performance high-entropy ceramics (HECs) [39]. HECs extend the cocktail effect from metallic alloys to inorganic ceramics, typically existing as single-phase solid solutions [2].
Figure 4 presents representative ball-and-stick models of typical high-entropy ceramic (HEC) structures, including rock salt, fluorite, and perovskite types. Benefiting from electron–phonon coupling among multi-component elements, such structural diversity not only enables the modulation of quantum behaviors (e.g., superconductivity) but also realizes synergistic enhancements in mechanical strength, high-temperature stability, electrical performance, radiation resistance, and corrosion resistance of the materials. Consequently, HECs are endowed with highly tunable bandgaps, phonon spectra, and ionic transport properties, thereby opening up a broad design space for their applications in fields such as ultra-high-temperature protection, thermoelectric conversion, solid-state electrolytes, and electromagnetic absorption. Thus, the cocktail effect is not only the intrinsic driving force behind the multifunctional integration and performance breakthroughs of high-entropy ceramics, but it also inaugurates a new paradigm for target-oriented material design based on elemental combination strategies [8,40,41].

3. Influence of AIP Process Parameters on the Microstructure of High-Entropy Ceramic Films

Arc ion plating (AIP), also known as multi-arc ion plating (MAIP), is a widely used physical vapor deposition (PVD) technique in industry. It evaporates target material via a cathodic arc to generate high-density plasma (ionization degree > 80%) in a vacuum chamber; metal ions are accelerated by an external electric field to strike the substrate, enabling rapid deposition of target atoms/ions, and even stable deposition on non-metallic substrates with rational parameter adjustment [42,43].
Compared with magnetron sputtering (MS), AIP features a high deposition rate (10–20 nm·s−1, suitable for thick films ≥ 5 µm), low energy consumption, simple equipment, and high target utilization—making it a mainstream method for high entropy coatings. For high-entropy ceramic (HEC) thin films, its high ionization rate effectively suppresses elemental segregation (atomic fraction deviation < 5%). Via single-target, alloy-target, or multi-target co-deposition, efficient HEC preparation is achieved, while substrate holder rotation ensures uniform film growth and high entropy system stability [44,45,46,47].
While both AIP and high-power impulse magnetron sputtering (HiPIMS) provide high-density plasma for high-quality thin film deposition, AIP holds distinct advantages in industrial scalability and cost-efficiency for HEC coatings. Unlike HiPIMS, which suffers from significantly lower deposition rates due to its high-voltage pulse characteristics, AIP leverages cathodic arc evaporation to maintain exceptional deposition efficiency, making it more viable for thick film preparation. Additionally, despite HiPIMS’ intense ion bombardment, improving surface smoothness and hardness, AIP’s unique mechanism achieves superior control over multi-component segregation (atomic fraction deviation < 5%) through intense ion fluxes that promote grain refinement and interfacial bonding [48,49]. AIP systems also exhibit lower energy consumption and simpler equipment architectures compared to HiPIMS’ complex power supplies, solidifying its position as the preferred choice for large-scale industrial production of HECs.
Increased ion bombardment energy in AIP promotes in-film atomic diffusion, forming dense diffusion layers or nano-layered/gradient structures. This refines grains, controls phase composition, and enhances interfacial bonding—endowing AIP-deposited films with higher adhesion than conventional evaporation coatings and underscoring the key role of ion bombardment [50,51]. Key process parameters for HEC films include substrate bias, reactive gas flow rate, and arc current; coordinating duty cycle and substrate temperature enables control of ion beam power and surface diffusion, yielding fine-grained, dense HEC films with suppressed segregation. These parameters directly regulate grain size, film quality, microstructure, and, ultimately, the macroscopic performance of the coatings [52,53,54] (Figure 5).

3.1. Substrate Bias

By regulating ion energy, substrate bias directly affects the ion-bombardment intensity, thereby controlling four key microstructural aspects of high-entropy ceramic (HEC) films: crystal structure, grain size, elemental distribution, and density [60,61]. Specifically, under low bias, weak ion-bombardment energy leads to high atomic disorder and partial amorphous phases; as bias increases, elevated ion kinetic energy promotes ordered atomic arrangement, forming stable crystalline solid solution structures (e.g., FCC, BCC). For grain size, low bias limits atomic mobility, causing grain coarsening and uneven distribution; with further bias enhancement, the intensified ion bombardment fragments the oversized grains and suppresses preferential growth, resulting in finer grains. In terms of elemental distribution, high-energy ion bombardment (under moderate-to-high bias) accelerates the diffusion and mixing of different atoms, effectively reducing segregation; it also enhances metal–nonmetal bonding (e.g., nitride formation), optimizing the film’s bonding state. Regarding density and morphology, low bias results in loose atomic stacking (prone to pores, defects, and columnar grains), while higher bias forces tighter packing—suppressing columnar growth, reducing porosity, and forming a smooth, dense surface. From a macroscopic perspective, the most direct effect of bias voltage variation on thin films is the change in the number of surface pitting particles and defects, as illustrated in Figure 6a–e. Meanwhile, the control of droplet particles and surface pitting can be optimized by rationally regulating the bias voltage, i.e., by adjusting the intensity of ion bombardment.
The regulatory role of substrate bias has been validated in simpler systems first. Kamaneva et al. [62] studied TiN films by AIP and found that increasing bias from −80 V to −150 V enhanced ion bombardment, leading to finer grains, higher (111)-oriented crystallinity, and improved density/hardness (Figure 6f–i). For HEC systems (the core focus here), substrate bias exhibits more complex, element-dependent regulatory behavior, due to multi-component interactions. Kuczyk et al. [63] deposited six high-entropy nitrides—(AlCrTaTiZr)N, (AlCrMoTaTiZr)N, (AlCrNbSiTiV)N, (HfNbTiVZr)N, (CrHfTiVZr)N, and (HfNbTaTiVZr)N—under biases of 0 V to −300 V via cathodic DC vacuum arc deposition. They observed that bias-driven ion bombardment affects the sputtering behavior and deposition rate, with distinct element responses: lighter elements (Ti, V) (lower boiling points, higher volatility) show more pronounced grain refinement and lattice distortion (due to higher mobility), while heavier elements (Ta, Hf) are mainly affected by lattice distortion (lower mobility limits grain refinement). Importantly, films were dense and uniform up to −200 V; beyond this bias, excessive ion energy caused surface pitting, large particle formation, temperature rise, and stress concentration—diminishing the strengthening effect.
Jia et al. [64] further revealed a non-monotonic relationship between bias and grain size in (FeCoCrNiAl)N HEC films (bias range: −20 V to −200 V). At low bias (−20 V), weak bombardment limited atomic mobility, leading to grain coarsening (average size: 5.9 nm); raising bias to −100 V intensified the bombardment, fragmenting the oversized grains and suppressing preferential growth, refining grains to 2.8 nm. However, further increasing bias to −150 V and −200 V strengthened localized thermal effects, restoring atomic mobility and causing slight coarsening (5.2–5.3 nm). This non-monotonic trend highlights the critical role of “optimal bias windows” in HEC fabrication, as excessive energy can offset refinement benefits via thermal effects.
In summary, substrate bias regulates the HEC film microstructure by tuning ion-bombardment intensity: moderate bias is optimal for grain refinement, segregation suppression, and densification. For HECs, multi-element interactions introduce unique behaviors (element-dependent responses, non-monotonic grain size), which must be considered for process optimization.
Figure 6. Surface morphologies of the AlCrSiN coatings, deposited at different pulse bias voltages. (a) 0 V; (b) −50 V; (c) −100 V; (d) −200 V; (e) −300 V. [65] (f,g) Formation of space globular structures: substrate surface wetting stimulation, increase in globule-to-surface contact area and decrease in globule height as substrate bias voltage increases. (f) 80 V–1.0 × 1.7 µm, and (g) 200 V–ϕ1.2 µm. (h,i) Formation of 3D structures with granular substructure: influence of bias voltage on the shape, the orientation with respect to the substrate, and the size of the structure. (h) 150 V–ϕ1.4 μm, H ≈ 2.0 μm, and (i) 200 V–ϕ720 nm to 2.5 µm, H ≈ 1.0 µm [62].
Figure 6. Surface morphologies of the AlCrSiN coatings, deposited at different pulse bias voltages. (a) 0 V; (b) −50 V; (c) −100 V; (d) −200 V; (e) −300 V. [65] (f,g) Formation of space globular structures: substrate surface wetting stimulation, increase in globule-to-surface contact area and decrease in globule height as substrate bias voltage increases. (f) 80 V–1.0 × 1.7 µm, and (g) 200 V–ϕ1.2 µm. (h,i) Formation of 3D structures with granular substructure: influence of bias voltage on the shape, the orientation with respect to the substrate, and the size of the structure. (h) 150 V–ϕ1.4 μm, H ≈ 2.0 μm, and (i) 200 V–ϕ720 nm to 2.5 µm, H ≈ 1.0 µm [62].
Coatings 16 00082 g006

3.2. Reactive Gas Flow Rate

The flow rate of reactive gas (e.g., N2, C2H2) is a core parameter governing the fabrication of high-entropy ceramic (HEC) thin films, as it directly dictates the concentration of non-metallic elements (N, C) incorporated into the film and thereby modulates the proportion of metal–nonmetal (Me-N/Me-C) bonds—an essential factor for tailoring microstructures and properties. This regulatory role follows a well-defined “three-state” mechanism [66,67]: an insufficient reactive gas supply leads to incomplete reaction of sputtered metal ions, resulting in dominant metal–metal (Me-Me) bonds, sub-stoichiometric phases (sub-nitrides or sub-carbides), and poor structural stability; in contrast, adequate gas supply facilitates sufficient Me-N/Me-C bond formation, driving the film toward stoichiometry and stabilizing the high-entropy solid solution structure; excessive gas flow, however, induces target poisoning (a dense nitride/carbide layer forms on the target surface), suppressing metal ion sputtering and reducing the deposition rate, while surplus non-metallic species (e.g., free N, amorphous carbon) may cause supersaturation and disrupt solid solution continuity. Taking HfNbTaTiVZrN films as an example, Figure 7a,b reveal the effects of nitrogen partial pressure and flow ratio on the film elemental content and deposition rate. A rational nitrogen flow rate facilitates the formation of nitrides, enhances film density and phase structure, and thereby achieves the dual goals of reducing surface defects and improving performance. The structural evolution of surface morphology and film thickness is illustrated in Figure 8.
This three-state regulation has been extensively validated in high-entropy ceramic (HEC) systems, particularly high-entropy nitrides controlled by N2 flow. Cui et al. [68] verified that N2 flow rate directly affects the elemental uniformity and film thickness of FeCoCrNiAlN and TiVCrNiSiN films, with adequate N2 reducing compositional fluctuation, increasing film thickness, and promoting densification. Li et al. [69] further established a direct correlation between N2 flow, nitrogen content (x, atomic fraction in (AlCrMoTiNi)1−xNx), microstructure, and performance via co-filtered cathodic vacuum arc deposition: as N2 flow increased (x from 0 to 0.45), the film structure evolved sequentially from an amorphous phase (x = 0, no N) to an amorphous matrix with metallic Ni (x = 0.29, insufficient N), and finally to a nanocrystalline face-centered cubic (FCC) solid solution with residual amorphous phases (x ≥ 0.37, adequate N), achieving optimal hardness, toughness, wear resistance, and corrosion resistance at x = 0.45 (defined as the “optimal N2 flow window” for saturated solid solution formation). Jia et al. [64] supplemented the N2 regulation mechanism in FeCoCrNiAlN films, noting that Cr preferentially bonds with N (enhancing hardness but impairing toughness if excessive) while Al lowers the alloy melting point to improve coating uniformity and densification; increasing Al content also drives an FCC-to-BCC phase transition to accommodate larger Al atoms, relieve lattice strain, and stabilize the system. Yan et al. [70] corroborated N2’s structural regulation effect in multi-arc ion plating-prepared (ZrTiNbV)N films: at a nitrogen flow ratio (Rn) of 0, the film was a body-centered cubic (BCC) alloy with dense large particles, numerous pits, and high surface roughness, whereas increased N2 flow induced a transformation to an FCC-type nitride solid solution with reduced roughness and enhanced uniformity, density, and substrate adhesion.
The regulatory effect of reactive gas flow is not limited to nitrides; it also extends to high-entropy carbides controlled by C2H2 flow, with system-specific characteristics. Xu et al. [71] fabricated (TiCrZrVNb)C films via multi-arc ion plating, adjusting C2H2 flow rate to control the acetylene ratio (Rc). Their resultsshowed a sequential structural evolution with increasing Rc: an amorphous state at Rc = 0 (no C2H2, due to elemental crystal structure differences and atomic size mismatch inhibiting long-range ordering), a single-phase FCC solid solution at Rc > 1 (sufficient C2H2 enabling Ti/Cr to react with C and form FCC Me-C phases), and a composite of FCC solid solution and amorphous carbon at Rc > 2 (excessive C2H2 leading to surplus carbon precipitation). This distinguishes carbides from nitrides: while excessive N2 primarily causes target poisoning, carbides are more prone to secondary phase formation, requiring stricter C2H2 flow control. Beyond N2 and C2H2, oxygen can serve as an auxiliary reactive gas to functionalize HEC films. Li et al. [72] incorporated O2 into Cr-based HEC coatings and found that an O2 flow rate of 130 sccm promotes Cr2O3 formation—this oxide phase imparts lubricity and chemical stability, significantly reducing frictional adhesion and enhancing working performance. This finding suggests multi-gas co-regulation (e.g., N2 + O2) may extend HEC functionality, though it remains a supplementary strategy to N2/C2H2 control, which is primary for solid solution formation.
Figure 7. (a) Metal content in terms of the dependence of the nitrogen flow ratio and a working pressure p = 2 Pa and p = 5 Pa, (b) deposition rate and nitrogen atomic content in terms of the dependence of the N2/(N2 + Ar) ratio and the working pressure [73].
Figure 7. (a) Metal content in terms of the dependence of the nitrogen flow ratio and a working pressure p = 2 Pa and p = 5 Pa, (b) deposition rate and nitrogen atomic content in terms of the dependence of the N2/(N2 + Ar) ratio and the working pressure [73].
Coatings 16 00082 g007
Figure 8. (al) Surfaces for (HfNbTaTiVZr)N coatings, deposited at working pressures of p = 2 Pa (af) and p = 5 Pa (gl) and varying nitrogen flow ratios RN2. (mp) Cross sections of (HfNbTaTiVZr)N coatings deposited at p = 5 Pa with different nitrogen flow ratios: (m) 0.09; (n) 0.12; (o) 0.25, and (p) 0.33 [73].
Figure 8. (al) Surfaces for (HfNbTaTiVZr)N coatings, deposited at working pressures of p = 2 Pa (af) and p = 5 Pa (gl) and varying nitrogen flow ratios RN2. (mp) Cross sections of (HfNbTaTiVZr)N coatings deposited at p = 5 Pa with different nitrogen flow ratios: (m) 0.09; (n) 0.12; (o) 0.25, and (p) 0.33 [73].
Coatings 16 00082 g008
In conclusion, reactive gas flow rate modulates HEC thin films by tuning the plasma activity, stoichiometry, and deposition rate, thereby governing compositional uniformity, phase orientation, grain size, and density—all of which directly impact hardness, elastic modulus, and wear/corrosion resistance. A universal “optimal flow window” exists across HEC systems: moderate flow is indispensable for achieving single-phase solid solutions and balanced properties, while insufficient or excessive flow degrades performance. System-specific differences (e.g., nitrides’ tolerance to excessive gas vs. carbides’ sensitivity to secondary phases) and element competition effects (e.g., Cr’s preferential reaction with N) must be considered in process optimization. For practical applications, systematic flow-gradient experiments combined with characterization techniques (XRD, XPS, TEM, nano-indentation) are necessary to identify the optimal gas flow window for each HEC system, enabling synergistic optimization of structure and properties.

3.3. Arc Current

The arc current influences plasma characteristics, target sputtering behavior, and film-growth kinetics, thereby exerting multidimensional effects on the composition, microstructure, and mechanical properties of high-entropy ceramic (HEC) thin films. Specifically, the arc current directly determines the energy and stability of cathode arc spots: at low arc currents, plasma energy is low and particle migration on the substrate is weak, resulting in porous films, coarse grains, or even amorphous structures; as the arc current increases, the cathode spot temperature rises, the metal atom ionization degree (up to 90%) increases, and both the concentration and kinetic energy of plasma metal ions rise markedly. This high-energy ion bombardment induces a “kinetic energy injection effect,” promoting dense atomic packing, single solid solution phase formation, and suppression of excessive grain growth—ultimately yielding a nanocrystalline structure [74,75]. Highly ionized plasma further enables complete reactions between multi-metallic ions in HECs and non-metallic species (N, C), facilitating uniform solid solution phases (e.g., FCC-type high-entropy nitrides) and preventing phase separation caused by insufficient ion concentration. Conversely, an excessively high arc current causes rapid target evaporation, generating abundant metal droplets (a typical arc ion deposition defect); these droplets form surface protrusions or internal pores, reducing film densification and inducing stress concentration [76]. For refractory metal targets (Nb, Ta, Hf) with low sputtering yields, moderate arc current elevation enhances the sputtering intensity, ensuring near-equimolar ratios of these elements in the film; however, mismatched arc currents across multiple targets may cause over-sputtering of low-melting-point metals, compromising compositional uniformity and film performance.
The regulatory role of the arc current has been extensively validated across diverse HEC and ceramic systems, with clear evidence of target-material dependence. Zhou et al. [77] fabricated TiAlSiN coatings via arc ion deposition, varying the arc current on a TiAlSi composite target. As shown in Figure 9a–c, increasing the multi-arc current induced systematic changes: surface roughness increased due to more large surface particles, while the internal microstructure improved—the coating density rose, porosity decreased, Al content increased continuously, and phase composition (dominated by Ti3AlN, AlN, Ti2N) showed enhanced hexagonal AlN formation at 70 A. Film growth was also modulated: thickness increased from 4.47 µm (50 A) to 8.84 µm (70 A), with microstructure transitioning from loose fibrous grains to dense equiaxed grains.
In contrast, Peng et al. [78] observed opposing trends in Cr coatings on a zirconium alloy (multi-arc ion plating). As shown in Figure 9d,e, increasing the arc current from 120 A to 150 A led to more porous columnar crystals and higher structural defect density—directly differing from Zhou et al.’s TiAlSiN results and highlighting system-specific arc current effects. Zhu et al. [79] further confirmed this dependence in AlCrN coatings (AlCr target): arc current elevation drove phase evolution from Al8Cr5 intermetallic compound to FCC CrAlN, alongside reduced surface metal particles/droplets and surface roughness (from 98.206 nm at 120 A to 51.463 nm at 180 A), yielding more uniform dense coatings (Figure 9f–i).
Collectively, these studies demonstrate that the arc current exerts non-linear, system-dependent effects on coatings: its influence on surface morphology (large particles/droplets), densification, and phase composition varies with the target material, and performance does not universally improve with an increasing current. Consequently, optimizing arc ion deposition processes for HECs requires a systematic, material-specific assessment of arc current parameters—ensuring alignment with the target system’s unique response to current modulation.

3.4. Discussion on Film Failure and Durability

Notably, despite the highly controllable process conditions and excellent film properties offered by AIP, the prepared films still suffer from failure issues such as large droplets and defects. Therefore, it is necessary to discuss the durability of AIP-deposited films. From the perspective of failure mechanisms, film failure does not occur instantaneously but is a progressive process involving the initiation of surface defects, crack propagation, and eventual delamination and spallation. During the corrosion or wear processes, corrosion products (e.g., oxides, sulfides) tend to accumulate at the coating/substrate interface or grain boundaries. Mismatch in thermal expansion coefficients or volume expansion of corrosion products induce microcracks at the interface; as these cracks propagate, the coating detaches along the interface, forming a distinct step-like delamination structure. For high-temperature protective coatings (e.g., Cr-Al, NiCrAlY), a dense oxide protective layer (e.g., Al2O3 or Cr2O3) forms on the surface. When the oxide layer thickness exceeds a critical value or is subjected to mechanical impact, the brittle oxide layer undergoes fracture. After the spallation of oxide fragments, the underlying metal substrate is directly exposed to the corrosive environment, leading to a sharp increase in the corrosion rate [80,81,82].
In addition to controlling optimal process parameters during film deposition (as discussed in the preceding sections) to minimize the number of particles and defects and achieve a sufficiently dense and uniform film, we propose that monitoring three key parameters—corrosion potential, interfacial adhesion, and surface roughness—during film service is conducive to evaluating the failure state of the film. The service life of AIP-deposited films typically consists of three stages: an initial stable period, a performance degradation period, and a final failure period. A decrease in corrosion potential indicates reduced corrosion resistance; the weakening of interfacial adhesion signifies the risk of film delamination; and an increase in surface roughness leads to enhanced friction and wear. Changes in these three properties all expose the coating to failure risks such as spallation and wear. Monitoring and optimizing these three properties before and after film service can extend the durability of the film to a certain extent, thereby creating greater value. Figure 10 illustrates several failure modes of the films.

4. Primary Properties of High-Entropy Ceramic Films Deposited by AIP

Structure determines performance. For high-entropy ceramic (HEC) thin films fabricated by arc ion plating (AIP), the key process parameters summarized earlier regulate the microstructure in a targeted manner: substrate bias dominates grain refinement and texture by adjusting ion incident energy; reactive gas flow rate and working pressure modulate phase composition and densification via controlling plasma density and collision frequency; and the arc current sets the deposition rate and microstructural uniformity through regulating target evaporation rate and metal atom ionization degree. This forms a tightly connected “process–structure–property” triad—yet the multi-element nature of HECs increases parameter optimization complexity, driving research from traditional trial-and-error toward a rational design paradigm [8,37,85].
This paradigm follows three core steps: first, thermodynamic models of high-entropy systems are used for preliminary compositional and structural screening; second, first principles (FP) calculations (e.g., density functional theory, DFT), machine learning (ML) techniques, and other informatics tools are integrated to conduct in-depth theoretical analysis and property prediction; finally, efficient orthogonal experiments explore optimal processing windows for different HEC systems in a multidimensional parameter space. Kretschmer et al. [86] exemplified this paradigm by applying DFT to predict the structural stability of (Hf, Ta, Ti, V, Zr)BN HEC systems (with varying B:N ratios): they investigated the stability of FCC (NaCl-type), hexagonal AlB2-type, and orthorhombic FeB-type structures, and validated their predictions by fabricating (Hf, Ta, Ti, V, Zr)BN composite coatings via magnetron sputtering. Building on this, Jia et al. [64] developed ML-based predictive models for (FeCoCrNiAl)N HEC films—taking key process parameters (N/Ar flow ratio, deposition bias, substrate temperature) and compositional variables (atomic fractions of Fe, Co, Cr, Ni, Al) as inputs to estimate the tribological performance, enabling a direct “parameter to property” prediction.
Overall, the core objective of this theoretical–experimental design is to retain AIP’s high ionization advantage while fabricating an ideal HEC microstructure: ultrafine grains, high density, near absence of defects, and a high-entropy-driven single-phase solid solution. This microstructure serves as the physical basis for the outstanding hardness, wear resistance, oxidation resistance, and corrosion resistance of HEC thin films. The following sections provide a detailed discussion of these key properties.

4.1. Mechanical Properties

High-entropy ceramic (HEC) films exhibit exceptional mechanical performance—maintaining ultrahigh hardness (≥30 GPa) and elastic modulus (≥380 GPa) while significantly improving fracture toughness—which is driven by the synergistic effects of multi-element solid solution strengthening, lattice distortion, and high configurational entropy. Specifically, high configurational entropy stabilizes the single-phase solid solution structure (providing a basis for the other two effects); solid solution strengthening arises from solute atoms impeding dislocation motion; and lattice distortion (from atomic size-mismatches) further increases dislocation resistance. Their mechanical performance also shows good adaptability to temperature, deposition atmosphere, and post-treatment processes; the entropy-driven design even enables flexible bending, broadening application prospects in high-temperature, high-load scenarios (e.g., aerospace engines, turbine blade components, micro-electronic packaging) [8,87].
This performance is supported by experimental data. Wan et al. [6] investigated FeCoCrNiAl0.1N HEC films, quantifying the effects of gas pressure and substrate bias on hardness (34.3 GPa) and Young’s modulus (>600 GPa). Both properties increased with nitrogen pressure—indicating that a higher N2 pressure promotes harder, stiffer coatings—while the maximum hardness was achieved at bias B4 and peak Young’s modulus at bias B5, highlighting substrate bias as a key regulator of mechanical performance. The H/E and H3/E2 ratios further enable a quantitative evaluation of HEC film performance. The H/E ratio (often called the “elastic strain limit”) represents the maximum elastic strain before plastic yielding—high values indicate excellent damage tolerance (microcracks are less likely to nucleate/propagate and elastic recovery buffers impact energy), challenging the “high hardness = brittleness” misconception. The H3/E2 ratio is proportional to the indentation plastic deformation yield pressure; high values suppress surface indentation and plastic deformation, which is critical for tribological applications (e.g., reducing wear from surface plowing) [88]. These metrics are validated in other HEC systems: Lin et al. [89] and Li et al. [69] reported hardness, elastic modulus, H/E, and H3/E2 data for Cr0.35Al0.25Nb0.12Si0.08V0.20N and (AlCrMoTiNi)1−xNx films. Cross-comparison shows that HEC films outperform their high-entropy alloy (HEA) counterparts (N = 0) by severalfold in hardness, modulus, toughness, and plastic deformation resistance. The reported maximum hardness, elastic modulus, and corresponding process parameters of some high-entropy ceramic (HEC) films are presented in Table 1. In addition to the high-entropy ceramic nitride films commonly used in industry, Figure 11 also presents the mechanical properties of high-entropy ceramic oxide films with different structures for reference.
Arc ion plating (AIP) is pivotal for enhancing HEC film mechanical properties, with two core mechanisms: First, high-energy particle bombardment promotes abundant Me-N/Me-C covalent bond formation—these bonds have much higher energies than metallic bonds, impeding atomic slip and increasing hardness/modulus [90]. Second, CAIP induces grain refinement (increasing the grain boundary area) and lattice distortion (from atomic size mismatches generating internal strain); both hinder dislocation motion, further elevating hardness [91]. Additionally, sufficient reactive gases enable multi-element ceramic phases (e.g., TiN, CrN) to form a single FCC solid solution via the high-entropy effect—its dense, isotropic packing ensures high hardness, while multiple slip systems enable plastic coordination, mitigating conventional single-phase ceramic brittleness.
Table 1. Reported maximum hardness and elastic modulus of some high-entropy ceramic films.
Table 1. Reported maximum hardness and elastic modulus of some high-entropy ceramic films.
Film SystemParametersHardness (GPa)Elastic Modulus (GPa)Ref.
(AlCrMoTiNi)1−xNxAIP. x = 0, −50 V, 0.15 Pa13.3212.7[69]
(AlCrMoTiNi)1−xNxAIP. x = 0.45, −50 V, 0.15 Pa32.26333.7
(ZrTiNbV)NAIP. Rn = 0, −200V, 200 °C, 0.28–0.31 Pa7.67176[70]
(ZrTiNbV)NAIP. Rn = 3, −200V, 200 °C, 0.54–0.59 Pa33.3411
(MoNbTaVW)1−xNxAIP/MS. x = 0, 120 A, 5 Pa17-[92]
(MoNbTaVW)1−xNxAIP/MS. x = 0.35, 0.15 A, 0.5 Pa28-
(AlCrTaTiZr)NMS. −100 V, 150 W30277[63]
(AlCrMoTaTiZr)NMS. Rn = 40%, 150 W, 0.8 Pa40.2420
(AlCrNbSiTiV)NMS. −100 V, 200 W41410
(HfNbTiVZr)NAIP. −110 V, 5 Pa44.3460
(CrHfTiVZr)NMS. −100 V, 350 W34.1316
(HfNbTaTiVZr)NAIP. −70 V45.32314
(TiCrZrVAl)NAIP. Rn = 0%, −200 V9.5176[93]
(TiCrZrVAl)NAIP. Rn = 80%, −200 V32.9400
(NbMoCrTiAl)NAIP. Cr-150 A, TiAl-180 A, Mo-90 A, Nb-120 A43326[94]
(TiCrZrVNb)CAIP. Rc = 0, −200 V, 350 °C11.8200[71]
(TiCrZrVNb)CAIP. Rc = 1, −200 V, 350 °C27.7384
Figure 11. Summary of mechanical properties of HEOs from a literature survey: (a) elastic modulus and hardness, (b) H/E ratio, (c) hardness, and (d) elastic modulus with distortion across different HEO structures. The hardness and elastic modulus of several important engineering metals are also included for comparison, which are common substrate materials for such coatings [95].
Figure 11. Summary of mechanical properties of HEOs from a literature survey: (a) elastic modulus and hardness, (b) H/E ratio, (c) hardness, and (d) elastic modulus with distortion across different HEO structures. The hardness and elastic modulus of several important engineering metals are also included for comparison, which are common substrate materials for such coatings [95].
Coatings 16 00082 g011

4.2. Tribological Performance

Tribological performance is a longstanding focus in thin film research. Conventional ceramics (e.g., SiC) exhibit poor tribological behavior due to their inherent brittleness [96,97]: under sliding contact, surface defects such as pores and grain boundaries easily induce stress concentration, triggering crack initiation. These cracks either propagate along grain boundaries, causing entire grains to detach from the matrix, or directly through grains, resulting in material spallation. At elevated temperatures or under frictional heating, SiC oxidizes to form a SiO2 glass layer; while this oxide layer provides limited lubrication and protection, its weak bonding with the underlying SiC matrix often leads to delamination under mechanical stress. This delamination exposes fresh substrate, which undergoes brittle fracture again, establishing a cyclic “oxidation–delamination–reoxidation” process that ultimately makes brittle removal the dominant wear mechanism of SiC.
In sharp contrast, high-entropy ceramic (HEC) films achieve superior tribological performance through the synergistic effects of microstructural and chemical features that are inherent to high-entropy systems. Severe lattice distortion, caused by atomic size mismatches among multiple constituent elements, significantly impedes dislocation motion and crack propagation, thereby reducing the risk of brittle fracture during sliding contact. Under external loads, HEC films do not undergo immediate brittle fracture; instead, they undergo slight localized plastic deformation via mechanisms such as grain boundary sliding and nanograin rotation. This plastic deformation effectively blunts crack tips, relieves local stress concentration, and thus delays coating spallation [98]. Notably, the multi-component nature of HECs facilitates the in situ formation of complex, dense, and well-bonded mixed oxide layers (e.g., Cr2O3, Al2O3) during tribological processes, and the comprehensive action mechanisms of these oxide layers are crucial for enhancing tribological performance. First, the dense oxide layer acts as a physical barrier, which tightly adheres to the film surface and effectively blocks the inward diffusion of oxygen from the external environment and the outward diffusion of metallic elements from the film matrix, thereby suppressing further oxidative wear and chemical degradation of the substrate. Second, the mixed oxide system exhibits excellent chemical stability and mechanical compatibility with the HEC matrix; it can withstand cyclic shear stress during sliding without premature delamination, maintaining long-term protective efficacy. Moreover, in certain cases, specific elements in HECs (e.g., V, Mo) preferentially oxidize to form oxides (V2O5, MoO3) with intrinsic lamellar or glassy lubricating properties. These oxides can form a continuous lubricating film at the friction interface, reducing direct contact between the HEC film and the counterbody, thereby significantly lowering the frictional resistance and achieving a “self-lubricating” effect [99]. Additionally, most HEC thin films possess a nanocrystalline/amorphous composite structure, which further optimizes their tribological behavior: the hard nanocrystalline phase serves as the load-bearing skeleton, effectively resisting the applied contact stress, while the surrounding amorphous phase (typically distributed at grain boundaries) relaxes stress through viscous flow under frictional heating and hinders the transgranular and intergranular propagation of cracks. This synergistic effect of the dual-phase structure makes brittle material removal exceptionally difficult for these coatings, thus enhancing their wear resistance.
Numerous experiments support these advantages. Jia et al. [64] studied (FeCoCrNiAl)N films and found that low nitrogen pressure led to insufficient ceramic phase, low hardness, deep wear tracks, and high COF (similar to conventional ceramics’ brittle wear). Optimized nitrogen pressure improved the hardness and wear resistance; excessive Cr reduced the toughness and wear resistance, while a higher critical load (Lc1) correlated with stronger film–substrate adhesion and lower COF. Mishra et al. [100] observed that high-entropy silicide (TiVNbMoW)Si2 had better wear resistance than conventional alloys, as the silicide phase absorbed frictional energy and acted as a lubricant, with wear dominated by mild adhesion and abrasion. Lothrop et al. [101] validated HECs’ superiority by comparing (AlCrTiMoV)N and TiN coatings (Figure 12): under the same conditions, (AlCrTiMoV)N had a comparable COF to TiN but half the wear rate, and SEM analysis of the wear debris confirmed its milder wear mechanism.
Optimizing the tribological performance of HEC films relies on the synergistic enhancement of microstructural densification, surface smoothness, and film–substrate adhesion. In cathodic arc ion plating (CAIP), a key fabrication technique for HECs, high-energy particle bombardment not only cleans the substrate surface but also promotes interfacial diffusion between the film and substrate, forming a robust bonding layer that strengthens film–substrate adhesion [102]. Additionally, the Me-N and Me-C covalent bonds in HECs, with bond energies far exceeding those of pure metallic bonds, make the films less prone to adhesive interaction with counter faces (e.g., Si3N4 balls or WC-Co balls) during sliding, thereby effectively reducing the COF. Furthermore, the multiple metallic elements in HEC systems can form an ultra-thin oxide film (e.g., Al2O3, Cr2O3) on the sliding surface; these oxides are both hard and lubricious, further lowering frictional resistance while protecting the interior of the coating from excessive wear and preventing adhesive wear-induced delamination.

4.3. Electrochemical Performance

High-entropy ceramic (HEC) films exhibit multiple advantages in electrochemical applications. Among them, high-entropy carbide films exhibit excellent electrochemical corrosion resistance due to their low porosity and uniform microstructure, which significantly reduces open-circuit potential and corrosion current density in corrosive media [103,104]. Their low leakage current and temperature-stable dielectric constant remain constant over a wide temperature range, endowing HEC films with superior energy storage and capacitance performance; for instance, flexible capacitors retain a stable dielectric response even after repeated bending cycles [105,106,107].
Figure 13a–c presents the morphological and defect analyses of TiN/ZrN composite films deposited on Ti-6Al-4V substrates, conducted by Geng et al. [83] via long-term salt spray corrosion tests. Combined with Figure 13e, the physicochemical processes of corrosion can be intuitively understood, where the formation and propagation of pits and droplets are identified as the key factors leading to the corrosion failure of the material. A comparison of the surface morphologies of Cr/TiAlN and Cr/TiAlSiN multilayers before and after corrosion tests simulating a nuclear reactor environment, conducted by Yang et al. [108], reveals that a large number of pores and irregularly sized particles appear on the surface of the Cr/TiAlN coating. This phenomenon is most likely attributed to the early-stage erosion of large particles adhering to the coating surface by high-pressure water and high temperature. These defects cause an uneven distribution of nitrogen within the film, which in turn induces microporous corrosion and degrades the corrosion resistance of the Cr/TiAlN coating. In contrast, the Cr/TiAlSiN coating remains dense and uniform under the same experimental conditions, with no obvious corrosion damage observed. This experiment further validates that the entropy-increased system contributes to the enhancement of the corrosion resistance of thin films.
Xia et al. [92] fabricated (MoNbTaVW)N high-entropy nitride coatings through cathodic arc deposition. By adjusting the nitrogen flow, they intensified electron scattering at grain boundaries and lattice distortions, which raised the resistivity from 7 × 10−7 Ω·m to 4 × 10−6 Ω·m. Additionally, Yan et al. [109] deposited (AlTiVCrMo)N high-entropy ceramic films with different nitrogen contents by using a co-filtering cathodic vacuum arc system. The interface contact resistance (ICR) of these coatings was significantly better than that of titanium substrates. Under a PEMFC assembly pressure of 1.4 MPa, a nitrogen-free high-entropy alloy (HEA) coating had an ICR of approximately 40 mΩ·m·cm−2. In contrast, a nitrogen-rich (28.12 at.%) HEC coating achieved a low ICR of 9 mΩ·m·cm−2, a corrosion potential of 0.193 V, and a corrosion current density of 3.11 × 10−7 A·cm−2. For comparison, the Ti substrate showed an ICR of 608 mΩ·m·cm−2, a corrosion potential of −0.276 V, and a corrosion current density of 1.84 × 10−5 A·cm−2. The introduction of nitrogen improves interfacial conductivity. Nitrogen-free coatings have a higher ICR because columnar grains and disordered grain-boundary atoms cause electron scattering. On the other hand, nitrogen incorporation forms nitride phases, mitigates lattice distortion, and introduces defect-mediated conductive electrons when the nitrogen content is optimal (≈28.12 at.%). This process enhances both corrosion resistance and electrical performance. Furthermore, Zhu et al. [79] reported that AlCrN films show significantly improved corrosion resistance as the current density increases. At 180 A, the corrosion potential reaches −165 mV (compared with −346 mV for the substrate), and the corrosion current density drops to 0.05 µA·cm−2. This results in a protection efficiency of 98.25%. The main reasons for this improvement are a higher Al content, which generates more Al2O3, and the dense coating structure that suppresses the diffusion of corrosive ions.
The high-energy particle bombardment that is inherent to cathodic arc ion plating produces highly dense, defect-scarce films. These films block electrolyte-infiltration pathways, which prevents interfacial corrosion or side reactions between the coating and substrate [110,111]. For example, they can suppress electrolyte decomposition in lithium-ion batteries or electrolyte leakage in fuel cells [112]. The disordered solid solution structure of HECs is characterized by substantial lattice distortion and defect sites (vacancies, interstitials). This structure provides rapid ion transport channels, lowers ion migration barriers, enhances ionic conductivity, and reduces interfacial resistance. Moreover, these defect pathways reduce film delamination or cracking caused by volumetric expansion/contraction during electrochemical cycling. A typical example is the volume effect in lithium-ion battery electrodes. This helps preserve the long-term integrity of the electrode/electrolyte interface [113]. By doping conductive elements such as Ti or Nb, HECs can form a “solid solution conductive network,” and this network tunes electronic conductivity. Additionally, adjusting deposition parameters to control the grain size, crystallographic orientation, and surface roughness further customizes the physical pathways for ion adsorption and diffusion.

4.4. Oxidation Resistance

High-entropy ceramic (HEC) films exhibit superior high-temperature oxidation resistance, which is attributed to the synergistic effects of multi-component high-configurational entropy and sluggish diffusion behavior [114,115]. These effects promote the formation of dense and stable oxide layers at elevated temperatures, which inhibit oxygen penetration and internal oxidation. Consequently, some HEC films retain structural integrity and hardness even above 1100 °C, extending the service life of substrate components (e.g., turbine blades) and overcoming the limitation of conventional yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ) coatings that fail at ~1200 °C.
The superior oxidation resistance of HECs has been verified by numerous experimental studies. Fu et al. [116] prepared CrAlSiWN coatings on SKH-51 steel via multi-arc ion plating, which exhibited excellent thermodynamic stability below 1100 °C and a low oxidation mass gain rate of only 0.08 mg/mm2 at 1100 °C. The study on TiAlSiN coatings by Zhou et al. [77] further revealed the underlying mechanism: Figure 14a shows that coatings prepared under different arc currents all exhibited low oxidation rates at 800 °C, with the arc current having a negligible effect on oxidation resistance. This is attributed to the synergistic effect of lattice distortion and sluggish diffusion, which inhibits oxidation kinetics and endows the coatings with high chemical stability. Figure 14b–f present the microstructure of the oxide layer formed on the AlMo0.5NbTa0.5TiZr alloy after oxidation at 1000 °C for 10 h [117]: surface roughness and pores accelerate oxidant penetration, while surface elemental enrichment (e.g., Mo-rich regions) can regulate local stability; the synergistic effect of differences in physical and chemical properties among various sublayers retards the diffusion and oxidation reactions. Studies on other systems also confirm the advantages of HECs: Ding et al. [118] reports that lattice distortion in TiZrHfN reduces the diffusion energy barrier and optimizes thermal performance; Peng et al. [119] demonstrated that (TiVCrZrHf)N maintains good thermal stability at 700 °C when deposited on copper substrates; and Yan et al. [120] synthesized (HfZrTaNbTi)C by spark plasma sintering, retaining a single-phase structure below 1140 °C. Zhou et al. [77] also found the regulatory effect of the arc current on oxidation resistance: the oxidation resistance improved with an increasing arc current, reaching the optimal level at 70 A. At this current, the formed Al2O3 barrier layer exists in a solid solution state due to the high-entropy effect, achieving grain refinement, increased density, and enhanced interface bonding. The core advantage of HECs stems from their multi-component disordered solid solution structure: it significantly increases the activation energy of atomic diffusion, reducing the diffusion rates of oxygen and metal ions by several orders of magnitude. Additionally, in coatings with 22.8% ZrO2 content (zirconium alloy substrate), elements such as Al regulate the thermal expansion coefficient of oxidation products, alleviating thermal cycling stress and avoiding spallation to ensure effective oxygen barrier performance.
The cathodic arc ion plating process further enhances the performance: high-energy ion bombardment fills pores and promotes atomic-level bonding between the film and substrate (e.g., metallurgical bonding), resulting in a density that is close to the theoretical maximum and eliminating the risk of blistering and delamination during oxidation. Combined with the sluggish diffusion effect (reducing the high-temperature diffusion rate of elements by 1–2 orders of magnitude), the (TiZrHfNbTa)C films prepared by Jin et al. [121] maintained integrity in air at 1600 °C, confirming that the HEC structure can shorten the diffusion path of O2/O2− and physically block the penetration of oxidizing media [122,123]. This verifies that the exceptional high-temperature oxidation resistance of HEC films originates from the synergistic effect of the intrinsic material properties (high configurational entropy and sluggish diffusion) and advanced preparation processes (cathodic arc ion plating), which together construct a robust oxidation barrier.

5. Prospects

Given the current development status of high-entropy ceramic (HEC) coatings deposited by arc ion plating (AIP), future research efforts should prioritize two core fundamental directions to overcome technical bottlenecks, while simultaneously addressing key challenges in industrial applications. On this basis, further expansion of technical boundaries and application scenarios can be realized. At the fundamental research level, two critical knowledge gaps remain to be filled: first, the dynamic coupling mechanism between multi-component metal ions and reactive gases within the plasma is not yet fully understood, and the regulatory effects of plasma parameters on coatings’ compositional uniformity and phase structure evolution require further quantitative investigation; second, research on the failure mechanisms of HEC coatings under extreme service conditions (e.g., high-temperature oxidation, corrosion, and wear) is insufficient, and the correlation between interfacial stress evolution and microstructural damage urgently demands in-depth analysis.
At the industrial application level, pressing challenges to be addressed include the following: achieving uniform deposition of coatings on large-sized and complex-shaped substrates and overcoming the limitations of target configuration and tooling design in existing AIP equipment; balancing the synergistic optimization of coating hardness, toughness, and adhesion, and developing low-cost, high-stability preparation processes that meet engineering requirements; establishing a standardized coating performance evaluation system; and bridging the critical gap between laboratory research findings and industrial-scale production.
Building on this foundation, future research on HEC thin films prepared by cathodic arc ion plating (CAIP, a technology belonging to the same arc ion plating system as AIP) can further break through the traditional “multiple metals + single non-metal” structural configuration. By precisely regulating core process parameters such as substrate bias voltage, arc current, and gas flow rate, researchers can introduce functional non-metallic elements (e.g., B, Si, O) to construct “metal–non-metal” mixed sublattice structures, while maintaining the thermodynamic stability of the high-entropy system. Such sublattice structures enable the diversification of chemical bonding at the atomic scale, thereby synchronously enhancing multiple properties of the films, including hardness, high-temperature oxidation resistance, and corrosion resistance [124,125,126,127].
Currently, the rapidly evolving industrial demands impose increasingly stringent requirements on the comprehensive performance of materials, and extreme service environments such as high temperature, radiation, and severe corrosion present new challenges for material development. Leveraging the synergistic effects of multiple principal elements in HEC thin films, systematic integration technologies (e.g., graded architectures, functional composite layers) can be developed. Conducting service life and reliability assessments, including high-temperature cycling tests, thermal shock tests, corrosion immersion experiments, and failure analysis (focused ion beam–transmission electron microscopy (FIB-TEM), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) depth profiling), will facilitate the application of such coatings in fields with rigorous performance requirements, such as aerospace thermal protection, cutting tools and molds, nuclear radiation environments, optoelectronic devices, electromagnetic wave absorption and shielding, catalysis, and energy storage/conversion. In addition, co-deposition of two-dimensional materials (e.g., graphene, MXene) with HEC thin films enables the construction of metal–non-metal 2D ternary composite systems [128,129]. Investigations into the preparation processes and phase stability of these novel composite films are expected to achieve synergistic improvements in multiple performance metrics of HEC coatings.
To advance the aforementioned research efficiently, high-throughput computation and machine learning screening techniques (density functional theory (DFT), CALPHAD phase diagram calculation method) can be incorporated into a systematic multiscale modeling framework (spanning atomic, mesoscopic, and macroscopic scales) to predict the coupling effects of composition on hardness, thermal stability, and oxidation behavior. In situ real-time characterization techniques (e.g., in situ TEM, synchrotron radiation) can be employed to verify the quantitative relationships between lattice distortion, the electronic band structure, and macroscopic properties induced by the multi-component system [130]. Meanwhile, process optimization can be driven by advanced diagnostic technologies: designing orthogonal experiments combined with real-time plasma monitoring to achieve precise regulation of bias voltage, gas flow rate, and arc current, thereby identifying the phase transition threshold of HEC thin films—a critical node for the comprehensive performance enhancement of coatings. Adopting auxiliary strategies such as low-power pulsed bias, plasma filtration, and target material recycling can reduce energy consumption, improve material utilization efficiency, and further enhance the economic feasibility of this technology, providing robust support for the translation of laboratory achievements into industrial production.

6. Conclusions

This paper systematically reviews the research progress in fabricating high-entropy ceramic (HEC) thin films via arc ion plating (AIP), with a primary focus on the interrelationships among “thermodynamic effects–process parameters–microstructure–material properties”. Firstly, it outlines the fundamental thermodynamic effects of HEC thin films, namely the high-entropy effect, lattice distortion effect, sluggish diffusion effect, and cocktail effect, which lay the foundation for the formation of simple solid solution structures and the films’ exceptional performance. Subsequently, the influences of several key AIP process parameters on the films are discussed in detail: the substrate bias voltage regulates grain size and film density; the reactive gas flow rate determines the content of non-metallic elements and phase composition; and the arc current governs the plasma characteristics and deposition rate. The combined action of these parameters dictates the final microstructure of HEC thin films. The review then describes the core properties of HEC coatings. Mechanically, they can simultaneously achieve high hardness and reliable toughness. Tribologically, they display low coefficients of friction and reduced wear rates. Electrochemically, the films show excellent corrosion resistance and favorable electrical conductivity. Moreover, they possess outstanding high-temperature oxidation resistance. Finally, the article looks ahead to future research directions. Prospective work includes the design of multicomponent non-metal sub-lattices; the integration of two-dimensional materials such as graphene and MXene into HEC composites; reliability-oriented modeling combined with machine-learning-driven optimization; and the expansion of applications into extreme environment fields, such as aerospace thermal protection, nuclear and radiation environments, and advanced energy systems. These perspectives offer feasible pathways for continued advancement in the field.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: H.C.; Methodology: W.L., H.C.; Data Curation: H.C.; Formal Analysis: T.C., H.C.; Writing – Review & Editing: H.C., B.M., J.W., X.M., P.L. and W.L.; Funding Acquisition: W.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors acknowledge the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51971148), the Explorers Program of Shanghai (No. 24TS1415500), and the Shanghai Engineering Research Center of High-Performance Medical Device Materials (No. 20DZ2255500).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Yeh, J.-W.; Chen, S.-K.; Lin, S.-J.; Gan, J.-Y.; Chin, T.-S.; Shun, T.-T.; Tsau, C.-H.; Chang, S.-Y. Nanostructured High-Entropy Alloys with Multiple Principal Elements: Novel Alloy Design Concepts and Outcomes. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2004, 6, 299–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhao, H.; Sun, W.; Lu, Y.; Song, W.; Liu, H.; Li, M. Research status and prospects of high-entropy composite ceramics. J. Asian Ceram. Soc. 2025, 13, 267–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Patel, P.; Roy, A.; Sharifi, N.; Stoyanov, P.; Chromik, R.R.; Moreau, C. Tribological Performance of High-Entropy Coatings (HECs): A Review. Materials 2022, 15, 3699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Muhammad Nadzri, N.I.; Halin, D.S.C.; Al Bakri Abdullah, M.M.; Joseph, S.; Mohd Salleh, M.A.A.; Vizureanu, P.; Burduhos-Nergis, D.-P.; Sandu, A.V. High-Entropy Alloy for Thin Film Application: A Review. Coatings 2022, 12, 1842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Li, W.; Liu, P.; Liaw, P.K. Microstructures and properties of high-entropy alloy films and coatings: A review. Mater. Res. Lett. 2018, 6, 199–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wan, Q.; Jia, B.Y.; Liu, P.; Luo, Y.; Chen, J.; Zhang, X.Y.; Xiao, Y.Y.; Abdelkader, T.K.; Refai, M.; Zhang, J.; et al. Microstructure and mechanical properties of FeCoCrNiAl0.1N high entropy alloy nitride coatings synthesized by cathodic arc ion plating using alloy target. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2023, 457, 129305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, W.; Huang, S.; Yasir, M.; Lv, M.; Guo, C.; Shi, Q.; Wei, C.; Lin, S.; Xiong, Y.; Dai, M. Hard and tough AlTiCrNiMo heterostructure high-entropy film deposited by arc ion plating method. Vacuum 2022, 203, 111272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, R.-Z.; Reece, M.J. Review of high entropy ceramics: Design, synthesis, structure and properties. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 22148–22162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Greer, A.L. Confusion by design. Nature 1993, 366, 303–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cantor, B.; Chang, I.T.H.; Knight, P.; Vincent, A.J.B. Microstructural development in equiatomic multicomponent alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2004, 375–377, 213–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tian, Y.; Zhou, W.; Tan, Q.; Wu, M.; Qiao, S.; Zhu, G.; Dong, A.; Shu, D.; Sun, B. A review of refractory high-entropy alloys. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2022, 32, 3487–3515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Otto, F.; Dlouhý, A.; Somsen, C.; Bei, H.; Eggeler, G.; George, E.P. The influences of temperature and microstructure on the tensile properties of a CoCrFeMnNi high-entropy alloy. Acta Mater. 2013, 61, 5743–5755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Oses, C.; Toher, C.; Curtarolo, S. High-entropy ceramics. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2020, 5, 295–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tsai, M.-H.; Yeh, J.-W. High-Entropy Alloys: A Critical Review. Mater. Res. Lett. 2014, 2, 107–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, Z.; Li, Z.-T.; Zhao, S.-J.; Wu, Z.-G. High-entropy carbide ceramics: A perspective review. Tungsten 2021, 3, 131–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, Y.; Sun, S.-K.; Guo, W.-M.; Xu, L.; Zhang, W.; Lin, H.-T. Optimal preparation of high-entropy boride-silicon carbide ceramics. J. Adv. Ceram. 2021, 10, 173–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, H.; Bi, J.; Yang, Y.; Qiao, L.; Liang, G.; Wang, S.; Yuan, J.; Chen, Y. Preparation, characterization and performance of high-entropy carbonitride ceramics. Ceram. Int. 2024, 50, 3034–3040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liaw, P.K.; Li, W. High Entropy Materials: Challenges and Prospects. Metals 2021, 11, 1643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Huang, S.; Zhang, J.; Fu, H.; Xiong, Y.; Ma, S.; Xiang, X.; Xu, B.; Lu, W.; Zhang, Y.; Weber, W.J.; et al. Irradiation performance of high entropy ceramics: A comprehensive comparison with conventional ceramics and high entropy alloys. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2024, 143, 101250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nemani, S.K.; Torkamanzadeh, M.; Wyatt, B.C.; Presser, V.; Anasori, B. Functional two-dimensional high-entropy materials. Commun. Mater. 2023, 4, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sun, Y.; Dai, S. High-entropy materials for catalysis: A new frontier. Sci. Adv. 2021, 7, eabg1600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Rost, C.M.; Sachet, E.; Borman, T.; Moballegh, A.; Dickey, E.C.; Hou, D.; Jones, J.L.; Curtarolo, S.; Maria, J.-P. Entropy-stabilized oxides. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Liu, R.; Chen, H.; Zhao, K.; Qin, Y.; Jiang, B.; Zhang, T.; Sha, G.; Shi, X.; Uher, C.; Zhang, W.; et al. Entropy as a Gene-Like Performance Indicator Promoting Thermoelectric Materials. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1702712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Li, F.; Bao, W.; Sun, S.-K.; Zhou, L.; Liu, J.-X.; Xu, F.; Zhang, G.-J. Synthesis of single-phase metal oxycarbonitride ceramics. Scr. Mater. 2020, 176, 17–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhao, S. Lattice distortion in high-entropy carbide ceramics from first-principles calculations. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2021, 104, 1874–1886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. He, Q.; Yang, Y. On Lattice Distortion in High Entropy Alloys. Front. Mater. 2018, 5, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Oh, H.S.; Ma, D.; Leyson, G.P.; Grabowski, B.; Park, E.S.; Körmann, F.; Raabe, D. Lattice Distortions in the FeCoNiCrMn High Entropy Alloy Studied by Theory and Experiment. Entropy 2016, 18, 321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, W.; Kan, D.; Liang, J.; Li, Y.; Bai, W.; Jiao, B.; Li, J.; Zhang, W. Defects Act in an “Introverted” Manner in FeNiCrCoCu High-Entropy Alloy under Primary Damage. Metals 2024, 14, 264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liu, J.-X.; Guo, L.; Wu, Y.; Qin, Y.; Liang, Y.; Zhang, G.-J. Lattice rigidity in high-entropy carbide ceramics with carbon vacancies. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2023, 106, 5612–5619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hassan, R.; Fahrenholtz, W.G.; Hilmas, G.E. Thermal properties of high entropy dual phase (Hf,Nb,Ta,Ti,Zr,)C-(Hf,Nb,Ta,Ti,Zr)B2 ceramics: Comparison with the high entropy single-phase ceramics and the effect of WC additions. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2025, 45, 117719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, Z.; Zhang, S. Research and Application Progress of High-Entropy Alloys. Coatings 2023, 13, 1916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Dąbrowa, J.; Danielewski, M. State-of-the-Art Diffusion Studies in the High Entropy Alloys. Metals 2020, 10, 347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jiang, S.; Shao, L.; Fan, T.-W.; Duan, J.-M.; Chen, X.-T.; Tang, B.-Y. Elastic and thermodynamic properties of high entropy carbide (HfTaZrTi)C and (HfTaZrNb)C from ab initio investigation. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 15104–15112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Tsai, M.-H. Physical Properties of High Entropy Alloys. Entropy 2013, 15, 5338–5345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Tsai, K.Y.; Tsai, M.H.; Yeh, J.W. Sluggish diffusion in Co–Cr–Fe–Mn–Ni high-entropy alloys. Acta Mater. 2013, 61, 4887–4897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Li, Q.; Chen, W.; Zhong, J.; Zhang, L.; Chen, Q.; Liu, Z.-K. On Sluggish Diffusion in Fcc Al–Co–Cr–Fe–Ni High-Entropy Alloys: An Experimental and Numerical Study. Metals 2018, 8, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Xiang, H.; Xing, Y.; Dai, F.; Wang, H.; Su, L.; Miao, L.; Zhang, G.; Wang, Y.; Qi, X.; Yao, L.; et al. High-entropy ceramics: Present status, challenges, and a look forward. J. Adv. Ceram. 2021, 10, 385–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tokarewicz, M.; Grądzka-Dahlke, M. Review of Recent Research on AlCoCrFeNi High-Entropy Alloy. Metals 2021, 11, 1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, J.; Liang, J.; Li, H.; Yang, Y.; Huo, D.; Liu, C. A review of high-entropy ceramics preparation methods, properties in different application fields and their regulation methods. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2024, 32, 1083–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Li, S.; Ai, S.; Liu, Z.; Wang, X.; Zhou, L.; Wu, T.; Bai, Y. Advancements in particle-reinforced high-entropy alloy coatings: Microstructure, mechanical properties and mechanisms. J. Alloys Compd. 2025, 1029, 180787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Li, L.-Y.; Zhang, M.; Jiang, M.; Gao, L.-H.; Ma, Z.; Cao, M.-S. High Entropy Ceramics for Electromagnetic Functional Materials. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2025, 35, 2416673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Xue, H.; Wang, F.; Meng, C.; Zhang, P.; Yue, S. The Law Study of Arc Ion Plating on Cyanate Ester Composite Surface. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2023, 2468, 012086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Li, Y.; Zhou, Z.; He, Y. Solid Lubrication System and Its Plasma Surface Engineering: A Review. Lubricants 2023, 11, 473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wang, Y.; Gao, Y.; Fan, Y. Interfacial Modification of Ti3AlC2/Cu Composites by Multi-Arc Ion Plating Titanium. Coatings 2022, 12, 1754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wen, X.; Li, J.; Gong, Y. Simulation and experimental research on grinding force and grinding surface quality of TiC-coated micro-grinding tools. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2023, 128, 1337–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wei, X.; Dong, Y.; Qu, D.; Ma, T.; Shen, J. Effect of Deposition Parameters on Microstructure of the Ti-Mg Immiscible Alloy Thin Film Deposited by Multi-Arc Ion Plating. Metals 2019, 9, 1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Chen, H.; Ma, Z.; Wang, Y.; Wei, T.; Yang, H.; Du, P.; Wang, X.; Zhang, R. An Orthogonal Experimental Study on the Preparation of Cr Coatings on Long-Size Zr Alloy Tubes by Arc Ion Plating. Materials 2022, 15, 7177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Saciotto, V.; He, Q.; Guimaraes, M.C.; DePaiva, J.M.; Kohlscheen, J.; Fontana, L.C.; Veldhuis, S.C. A Comparative Study on Al0.6Ti0.4N Coatings Deposited by Cathodic Arc and HiPIMS in End Milling of Stainless Steel 316L. Coatings 2024, 14, 811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hain, C.; Schweizer, P.; Sturm, P.; Borzì, A.; Thomet, J.E.; Michler, J.; Hessler-Wyser, A.; Nelis, T. Microwave plasma-assisted reactive HiPIMS of InN films: Plasma environment and material characterisation. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2023, 454, 129188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Du, H.; Zhang, K.; Liu, D.; Lang, W. Progress in the Circular Arc Source Structure and Magnetic Field Arc Control Technology for Arc Ion Plating. Materials 2025, 18, 3498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Vallée, C.; Bonvalot, M.; Belahcen, S.; Yeghoyan, T.; Jaffal, M.; Vallat, R.; Chaker, A.; Lefèvre, G.; David, S.; Bsiesy, A.; et al. Plasma deposition—Impact of ions in plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition, plasma enhanced atomic layer deposition, and applications to area selective deposition. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 2020, 38, 033007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Xian, L.; Zhao, H.; Xian, G.; Fan, H.; Xiong, J. Oxidation resistance and thermal insulation performance of thin nano-multilayered (Al,Cr)2O3/ZrO2 coating prepared by arc ion plating technique. Mater. Lett. 2020, 281, 128649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wang, Y.; Fang, T.; Zheng, X.; Jin, H. Microstructure, Esthetics and Engineering Performance of TiN Coatings Deposited by Multi-Arc Ion Plating. Coatings 2025, 15, 1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Novikov, V.; Stepanov, N.; Zherebtsov, S.; Salishchev, G. Structure and Properties of High-Entropy Nitride Coatings. Metals 2022, 12, 847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Deng, Y.; Chen, W.; Li, B.; Wang, C.; Kuang, T.; Li, Y. Physical vapor deposition technology for coated cutting tools: A review. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 18373–18390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wang, S.; Lin, Z.; Qiao, H.; Ba, D.; Zhu, L. Influence of a Scanning Radial Magnetic Field on Macroparticle Reduction of Arc Ion-Plated Films. Coatings 2018, 8, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kong, Y.; Tian, X.; Gong, C.; Tian, Q.; Yang, D.; Wu, M.; Li, M.; Golosov, D.A. Microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti-Al-Cr-N films: Effect of current of additional anode. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 483, 1058–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhang, Z.; Zhang, L.; Yuan, H.; Qiu, M.; Zhang, X.; Liao, B.; Zhang, F.; Ouyang, X. Tribological Behaviors of Super-Hard TiAlN Coatings Deposited by Filtered Cathode Vacuum Arc Deposition. Materials 2022, 15, 2236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Tokoroyama, T.; Tagami, Y.; Murashima, M.; Lee, W.Y.; Umehara, N.; Kousaka, H. Tribological Property of ta-CNx:Ta Deposited via Ion Beam Assisted-Filtered Arc Deposition. Tribol. Int. 2022, 168, 107450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zhao, Y.; He, Y.; Chen, Q.; Gong, Z.; Wang, Z.; Wang, K.; Shi, M.; Chen, R. Effect of Substrate Bias Voltage on Structure and Corrosion Resistance of AlCrN Coatings Prepared by Multi-Arc Ion Plating. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2021, 16, 210938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zhang, M.; Hu, X.; Yang, X.; Xu, F.; Kim, K.-H.; Shao, Z. Influence of substrate bias on microstructure and morphology of ZrN thin films deposited by arc ion plating. Trans. Nonferr. Met. Soc. China 2012, 22, s115–s119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kameneva, A.L.; Guselnikova, L.y.N.; Soshina, T.O. Establishing the Relationship between Substrate Bias Voltage and Formation Process of Single Component Ion-Plasma’s Film Based on Tin by Electric-Arc Evaporation. e-J. Surf. Sci. Nanotechnol. 2011, 9, 34–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kuczyk, M.; Krülle, T.; Zawischa, M.; Kaspar, J.; Zimmer, O.; Leonhardt, M.; Leyens, C.; Zimmermann, M. Microstructure and mechanical properties of high entropy alloy nitride coatings deposited via direct current cathodic vacuum arc deposition. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2022, 448, 128916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Jia, B.; Wan, Q.; Yan, L.; Luo, Y.; Wei, Q.; Niu, C.; Yang, B.; Li, S.; Meng, L. Tribological properties and machine learning prediction of FeCoCrNiAlN high entropy coatings. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2024, 477, 130341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Zhang, R.; Liu, Y.; Wang, C.; Cao, F.; Fan, Q.; Wang, T. Structure and Properties of Arc Ion Plating Deposited AlCrSiN Coatings Controlled by Pulsed Bias Voltage. Metals 2023, 13, 1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Gong, Z.; Chen, R.; Li, J.; Cao, P.; Geng, H. Effect of N2 Flow Rate on Structure and Corrosion Resistance of AlCrN Coatings Prepared by Multi-Arc Ion Plating. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2020, 15, 1117–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Yeh, A.-C.; Gorsse, S.; Keppens, V.; Gilbert, D.A. Design and development of high entropy materials. APL Mater. 2023, 11, 030402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Cui, M.; Ding, X.; Lian, Y.; Wu, Y.; Jiao, J.; Cheng, Y.; Yang, J.; Zhang, J.; Sun, Y. Effect of nitrogen flow rates on the structural and properties of TiVCrNiSi(N) high entropy coating deposited by arc ion plating. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2025, 499, 131868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Li, J.; Zhao, Y.; Shi, X.; Zheng, J.; Dong, Y.; Chen, J.; Chen, Y.; Sun, D.; Zhang, S.; Wang, S. (AlCrMoTiNi)1-XNX high entropy ceramic with high hardness and toughness prepared by co-filtered cathodic vacuum arc deposition. Ceram. Int. 2023, 49, 40382–40391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Yan, D.; Xu, W.; Li, J.; Ji, L.; Liu, X.; Shi, L.; Sun, C.; Li, H. Effect of nitrogen/argon ratios on structures and properties of high-entropy (ZrTiNbV)N nitride films by multi-arc ion plating. Vacuum 2024, 225, 113173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Xu, W.; Jia, B.; Liu, X.; Ji, L.; Zhou, H.; Chen, J.; Sun, C.; Li, H. Structural evolution and mechanical properties of multi-element (TiCrZrVNb)C high entropy ceramics films by multi-arc ion plating. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 19191–19197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Li, H.; Chen, X.; Shen, M.; Guo, C. Effect of oxygen flow rate on structure and properties of Cr-based coatings deposited by arc ion plating. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2025, 3009, 012011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Krülle, T.; Kuczyk, M.; Leonhardt, M.; Zimmer, O.; Leyens, C. The Influence of Nitrogen Partial Pressure on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of HfNbTaTiVZr High-Entropy Nitride Coating Deposited via Direct Current Cathodic Vacuum Arc Deposition. Coatings 2024, 14, 398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Chu, Y.; Cui, B.; Monteverde, F. High-entropy ceramics. J. Mater. 2025, 11, 100966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Xiang, Y.; Zou, C. Effect of Arc Currents on the Mechanical, High Temperature Oxidation and Corrosion Properties of CrSiN Nanocomposite Coatings. Coatings 2022, 12, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Zou, S.; Luo, Z.; Li, Y.; Yuan, L.; Tang, Y.; Zhou, J.; Li, H. Effect of Arc Current on the Microstructure of AlTiN-Coated Tools and Milling of 304 Stainless Steel. Coatings 2024, 14, 704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Zhou, J.; Fan, X.; Chen, H.; Feng, D. Effect of multi-arc current on the microstructure and properties of TiAlSiN coating on zircaloy-4 alloy. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2023, 25, 7101–7108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Peng, Y.; Du, P.; Liu, Y.; Wang, H.; Liu, S.; Zhang, W. Investigation on Microstructures and High-Temperature Oxidation Resistance of Cr Coatings on Zircaloy-4 by Multi-Arc Ion Plating Technology. Materials 2022, 15, 6755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Zhu, S.; Qin, Y.; Mei, H. Influence of Arc Current on Surface Properties and Corrosion Resistance of AlCrN Coatings Deposited by Multi-arc Ion Plating. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2020, 15, 5352–5361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Yang, D.; Yan, F.; Zhang, W.; Xie, Z. Microstructure, Wear Resistance and Corrosion Resistance of CrN Coating with Platinum-Iridium Co-Doping. Coatings 2024, 14, 238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Zhang, Y.; Du, Q.; Lin, T.; Tang, S.; Hu, J. A Study on the Corrosion Resistance of Hydrophobic Coatings on 65Mn Steel. Coatings 2021, 11, 1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Alamgir, A.; Bogatov, A.; Jõgiaas, T.; Viljus, M.; Raadik, T.; Kübarsepp, J.; Sergejev, F.; Lümkemann, A.; Kluson, J.; Podgursky, V. High-Temperature Oxidation Resistance and Tribological Properties of Al2O3/ta-C Coating. Coatings 2022, 12, 547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Geng, M.; He, G.; Sun, Z.; Chen, J.; Yang, Z.; Li, Y. Corrosion Damage Mechanism of TiN/ZrN Nanoscale Multilayer Anti-Erosion Coating. Coatings 2018, 8, 400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Sousa, V.F.C.; Fernandes, F.; Silva, F.J.G.; Costa, R.D.F.S.; Sebbe, N.; Sales-Contini, R.C.M. Wear Behavior Phenomena of TiN/TiAlN HiPIMS PVD-Coated Tools on Milling Inconel 718. Metals 2023, 13, 684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Jurków, D.; Stiernstedt, J. Investigation of High Temperature Co-fired Ceramics sintering conditions using Taguchi Design of the experiment. Ceram. Int. 2014, 40, 10447–10455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Kretschmer, A.; Kirnbauer, A.; Pitthan, E.; Primetzhofer, D.; Yalamanchili, K.; Rudigier, H.; Mayrhofer, P.H. High-entropy alloy inspired development of compositionally complex superhard (Hf,Ta,Ti,V,Zr)-B-N coatings. Mater. Des. 2022, 218, 110695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Brune, P.M.; Hilmas, G.E.; Fahrenholtz, W.G.; Watts, J.L.; Ryan, C.J.; DeSalle, C.M.; Wolfe, D.E.; Curtarolo, S. Hardness of single phase high entropy carbide ceramics with different compositions. J. Appl. Phys. 2024, 135, 165106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Chen, X.; Du, Y.; Chung, Y.-W. Commentary on using H/E and H3/E2 as proxies for fracture toughness of hard coatings. Thin Solid Films 2019, 688, 137265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Lin, Y.-C.; Hsu, S.-Y.; Song, R.-W.; Lo, W.-L.; Lai, Y.-T.; Tsai, S.-Y.; Duh, J.-G. Improving the hardness of high entropy nitride (Cr0.35Al0.25Nb0.12Si0.08V0.20)N coatings via tuning substrate temperature and bias for anti-wear applications. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2020, 403, 126417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Cao, Z.; Sun, J.; Meng, L.; Zhang, K.; Zhao, J.; Huang, Z.; Yun, X. Progress in densification and toughening of high entropy carbide ceramics. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2023, 161, 10–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Park, H.J.; Kim, Y.S.; Lee, Y.H.; Hong, S.H.; Kim, K.S.; Park, Y.K.; Kim, K.B. Design of nano-scale multilayered nitride hard coatings deposited by arc ion plating process: Microstructural and mechanical characterization. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2021, 15, 572–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Xia, A.; Dedoncker, R.; Glushko, O.; Cordill, M.J.; Depla, D.; Franz, R. Influence of the nitrogen content on the structure and properties of MoNbTaVW high entropy alloy thin films. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 850, 156740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Xu, W.; Liao, M.; Liu, X.; Ji, L.; Ju, P.; Li, H.; Zhou, H.; Chen, J. Microstructures and properties of (TiCrZrVAl)N high entropy ceramics films by multi-arc ion plating. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 24752–24759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Ivanov, Y.F.; Akhmadeev, Y.K.; Prokopenko, N.A.; Krysina, O.V.; Koval, N.N.; Petrikova, E.A.; Tolkachev, O.S.; Shugurov, V.V.; Uglov, V.V.; Shmakov, A.N. Structure and Properties of NbMoCrTiAl High-Entropy Alloy Coatings Formed by Plasma-Assisted Vacuum Arc Deposition. Coatings 2023, 13, 1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Lee, J.Y.; Cai, W. From fabrication to mechanical properties: Exploring high-entropy oxide thin films and coatings for high-temperature applications. Front. Coat. Dye. Interface Eng. 2024, 2, 1417527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Cui, S.; Liu, Y.; Wang, T.; Tieu, K.; Wang, L.; Zeng, D.; Li, Z.; Li, W. Tribological behavior comparisons of high chromium stainless and mild steels against high-speed steel and ceramics at high temperatures. Friction 2022, 10, 436–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Wu, J.; Shen, M.; Wang, W.; Cheng, Y.; Zhu, S. High power arc ion plating of thick Cr2N hard coating on Ti-based alloys: Oxidation and wear behaviors. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2022, 448, 128924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Li, D.; Lu, X.; Li, J.; Chen, Y. Study on high-temperature friction and wear properties of Arc Ion plating Cr coating. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2024, 2760, 012080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Feltrin, A.C.; Xing, Q.; Akinwekomi, A.D.; Waseem, O.A.; Akhtar, F. Review of Novel High-Entropy Protective Materials: Wear, Irradiation, and Erosion Resistance Properties. Entropy 2023, 25, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Mishra, A.; Jatti, V.S. Prediction of Wear Rate in Al/SiC Metal Matrix Composites Using a Neurosymbolic Artificial Intelligence (NSAI)-Based Algorithm. Lubricants 2023, 11, 261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Lothrop, A.; Yang, Q.; Huang, X. Microstructure, Mechanical Properties, Wear and Erosion Performance of a Novel High Entropy Nitride (AlCrTiMoV)N Coating Produced by Cathodic Arc Evaporation. Coatings 2023, 13, 619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Akhter, R.; Zhou, Z.; Xie, Z.; Munroe, P. Influence of substrate bias on the scratch, wear and indentation response of TiSiN nanocomposite coatings. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2021, 425, 127687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Chen, Y.; Xuan, T.; Li, X.; Liu, T.; Wu, B.; Tuo, Y.; Chen, X.; Gao, B. Pyrochlore-structured high-entropy rare-earth zirconates (La0.2Nd0.2Sm0.2Eu0.2A0.2)2Zr2O7 (A = Dy, Ho, or Er): Promising NTC thermistor ceramics for ultra-high temperature sensing. Ceram. Int. 2025, 51, 43583–43590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Yoon, H.W.; Choi, Y.; Yeo, K.H.; Kim, S.G.; Cho, Y.K. Chromium Coatings Applied to Zr Alloy Claddings by Cathodic Arc Ion Plating: Effect of Nitrogen Inclusion on Limiting Columnar Defects. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2024, 26, 2400804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Dou, L.; Yang, B.; Ye, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, W.; Chen, H.; Jiang, Y.; Fang, B.; Lan, S.; Li, Q.; et al. Flexible high-entropy functional ceramics. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 5915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Shu, H.; Zhong, W.; Feng, J.; Zhao, H.; Chen, Y.; Hong, F.; Yue, B. Observation of superconductivity and ferromagnetism in high-entropy carbide ceramics. Acta Mater. 2025, 285, 120693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Fu, Y.; Li, J.; Luo, H.; Du, C.; Li, X. Recent advances on environmental corrosion behavior and mechanism of high-entropy alloys. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2021, 80, 217–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Yang, Z.; Fan, X.; Qiu, C.; Yang, X.; Liu, Y.; Wang, X. High temperature and high pressure flowing water corrosion resistance of multi-arc ion plating Cr/TiAlN and Cr/TiAlSiN coatings. Mater. Res. Express 2019, 6, 086449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Yan, W.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Q.; Chen, S.; Yuan, H.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, L.; Luo, J.; Pang, P.; et al. Corrosion-resistant and interfacial conductive AlTiVCrMo high-entropy alloy and (AlTiVCrMo)Nx high-entropy ceramics coatings for surface modification of bipolar plates in proton exchange membrane fuel cells. J. Power Sources 2022, 527, 231217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Kim, J.-G.; Na, S.-I.; Kim, H.-K. Flexible and transparent IWO films prepared by plasma arc ion plating for flexible perovskite solar cells. AIP Adv. 2018, 8, 105122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Gao, P.-H.; Fu, R.-T.; Chen, B.-Y.; Zeng, S.-C.; Zhang, B.; Yang, Z.; Guo, Y.-C.; Liang, M.-X.; Li, J.-P.; Lu, Y.-Q.; et al. Corrosion Resistance of CoCrFeNiMn High Entropy Alloy Coating Prepared through Plasma Transfer Arc Claddings. Metals 2021, 11, 1876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Gao, Z.; Guo, Q.; Wang, Y.; Li, M.; Yang, Z. Effect of Micro-arc Oxidation/Multi-arc Ion Plating on the Galvanic Corrosion Behavior of TC4/AH36 Steel. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2025, 34, 22406–22416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Deng, C.; Wang, T.; Wu, P.; Zhu, W.; Dai, S. High entropy materials for catalysis: A critical review of fundamental concepts and applications. Nano Energy 2024, 120, 109153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Chen, J.; Zhou, X.; Wang, W.; Liu, B.; Lv, Y.; Yang, W.; Xu, D.; Liu, Y. A review on fundamental of high entropy alloys with promising high–temperature properties. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 760, 15–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Veselkov, S.; Samoilova, O.; Shaburova, N.; Trofimov, E. High-Temperature Oxidation of High-Entropic Alloys: A Review. Materials 2021, 14, 2595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Fu, Y.; Wang, G.; Zhu, Y.; Shi, C.; Lu, G.; Han, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Xu, J.; Lan, R. Critical processing parameters optimization and characterization of CrAlSiWN coating by industrial arc ion plating. Vacuum 2024, 226, 113313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Cao, Y.; Liu, Y.; Liu, B.; Zhang, W.; Wang, J.; Du, M. Effects of Al and Mo on high temperature oxidation behavior of refractory high entropy alloys. Trans. Nonferr. Met. Soc. China 2019, 29, 1476–1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Ding, N.; Jiang, H.-H.; Xu, C.-R.; Shao, L.; Tang, B.-Y. Lattice distortion, mechanical and thermodynamic properties of (TiZrHf)C and (TiZrHf)N ceramics. Appl. Phys. A 2023, 129, 720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Peng, X.; Chen, L. Effect of high entropy alloys TiVCrZrHf barrier layer on microstructure and texture of Cu thin films. Mater. Lett. 2018, 230, 5–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Yan, X.; Constantin, L.; Lu, Y.; Silvain, J.-F.; Nastasi, M.; Cui, B. (Hf0.2Zr0.2Ta0.2Nb0.2Ti0.2)C high-entropy ceramics with low thermal conductivity. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2018, 101, 4486–4491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Jin, H.; Lv, Z.; Zhang, F.; He, S.; Luo, Y.; Wang, L.; Yin, F. Exploring the electronic structures and mechanical properties of (TiZrHfNbTa)C1-xNx high-entropy carbonitrides from first-principles calculations. Solid State Commun. 2025, 399, 115890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Ye, B.; Wen, T.; Liu, D.; Chu, Y. Oxidation behavior of (Hf0.2Zr0.2Ta0.2Nb0.2Ti0.2)C high-entropy ceramics at 1073–1473 K in air. Corros. Sci. 2019, 153, 327–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Suvorova, V.; Suvorov, D.; Volodko, S.; Poliakov, M.; Volkova, L.; Nepapushev, A.; Moskovskikh, D. High-entropy carbonitrides with superior oxidation resistance: Fabrication and investigation of oxidation behavior under non-isothermal and isothermal conditions. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2025, 45, 116980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Gild, J.; Samiee, M.; Braun, J.L.; Harrington, T.; Vega, H.; Hopkins, P.E.; Vecchio, K.; Luo, J. High-entropy fluorite oxides. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2018, 38, 3578–3584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Han, Y.; Liu, X.; Zhang, Q.; Huang, M.; Li, Y.; Pan, W.; Zong, P.-a.; Li, L.; Yang, Z.; Feng, Y.; et al. Ultra-dense dislocations stabilized in high entropy oxide ceramics. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 2871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Tang, Y.; Xia, Y.; Yao, D.; Zhu, M.; Zhao, J.; Zeng, Y.-P. Thermal conductivity and mechanical properties of fluorite-type porous (Ce0.2Zr0.2Ti0.2Sn0.2Ca0.2)O2-δ high-entropy ceramics. J. Porous Mater. 2024, 31, 2031–2041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Ma, Z.; Gao, Y.; Ma, C.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, W.; Zhang, G.; Li, J.; Feng, S.; Li, J. A Novel Strategy for Preparing High-Entropy Ceramics Through Full Glass Crystallization. Energy Environ. Mater. 2025, 8, e70065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Liu, S.; Sun, Y.; Yang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Cai, Z. Highly Loaded and Binder-Free Molybdenum Trioxide Cathode Material Prepared Using Multi-Arc Ion Plating for Aqueous Zinc Ion Batteries. Materials 2022, 15, 5954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Feng, S.; Lu, W.; Guo, F.; Wang, C.; Zou, L. Effects of Pulse Ion Source Arc Voltage on the Structure and Friction Properties of Ta-C Thin Films on NBR Surface. Coatings 2025, 15, 809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Gu, Y.; Wang, J.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Dai, B.; Li, Y.; Liu, G.; Bao, L.; Lu, R. Machine Learning-Driven Design and Optimization of Multi-Metal Nitride Hard Coatings via Multi-Arc Ion Plating Using Genetic Algorithm and Support Vector Regression. Materials 2025, 18, 3478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. (a) Timeline and progress in entropy-stabilized systems over the past decade with the transition toward high-entropy 2D materials in 2021 [20]. (b) Four different degrees of order and disorder between the phase-segregated structures and the ideal entropy-stabilized solid solutions. The red regions represent the partially ordered atomic arrangements [21]. (c) Configurational entropy change as a function of the number of species (N) and the mole fraction of the X component system varying from N = 2 to N = 5 [22]. The maximum entropy is attained at equimolar compositions. Depending on S/R, one distinguishes between low, medium, and high-entropy materials. The panel on the right shows the energy (E) region for dominant entropy effects (shaded area) in a system [23]. The red line indicates the enthalpic contribution (ΔH) and the line in green shows the entropic contribution (ΔS). (d) A multiple principal element system with 2 metallic and 3 non-metallic species in the crystal lattice as an example of entropy stabilization by both metal and non-metal sites [24].
Figure 1. (a) Timeline and progress in entropy-stabilized systems over the past decade with the transition toward high-entropy 2D materials in 2021 [20]. (b) Four different degrees of order and disorder between the phase-segregated structures and the ideal entropy-stabilized solid solutions. The red regions represent the partially ordered atomic arrangements [21]. (c) Configurational entropy change as a function of the number of species (N) and the mole fraction of the X component system varying from N = 2 to N = 5 [22]. The maximum entropy is attained at equimolar compositions. Depending on S/R, one distinguishes between low, medium, and high-entropy materials. The panel on the right shows the energy (E) region for dominant entropy effects (shaded area) in a system [23]. The red line indicates the enthalpic contribution (ΔH) and the line in green shows the entropic contribution (ΔS). (d) A multiple principal element system with 2 metallic and 3 non-metallic species in the crystal lattice as an example of entropy stabilization by both metal and non-metal sites [24].
Coatings 16 00082 g001
Figure 2. (a) The illustrations of perfect BCC lattice in pure metals and distorted BCC lattice in multicomponent alloys. (b) The schematics of close packed atoms in a well-defined lattice with volumetric strain close-packed atoms in a distorted lattice with volumetric and shear strains. Note that the color balls represent the original constituent atoms, while the dashed circles donate the profile of atoms with residual strains [26]. (c) Projection of one of the employed special quasi-random structure (SQS) supercells onto the (100) plane. The black arrows indicate the nearest neighbor bonds for the Mn atoms that are used to extract the distribution of the local bond distortions, as shown in (d). In (d), the first principles-computed lattice distortion histogram of Mn bonds in FeCoNiCrMn is based on 1500 evaluated Mn bonds. The theoretical data are further analyzed by Gaussian fits (see the text for details). The experimentally measured averaged distortion is indicated by the red solid line. Although the mean distortion is rather small (<0.5%), the range of local distortions at the standard deviation is significant (≈2%), as indicated in (d) [27]. (e) Comparison of the first peak of the radial distribution function on Ni and FeNiCrCoCu (the inset on the right is the full width at half maximum of the first peak of the radial distribution function) [28]. (f) Atomic volume in A3 for different atomic species (Fe, Ni, Cr, Co, and Cu for the HEA, Ni for pure Ni) in the final steady state. The inset on the right is the average atomic volume of pure Ni and the HEA [28].
Figure 2. (a) The illustrations of perfect BCC lattice in pure metals and distorted BCC lattice in multicomponent alloys. (b) The schematics of close packed atoms in a well-defined lattice with volumetric strain close-packed atoms in a distorted lattice with volumetric and shear strains. Note that the color balls represent the original constituent atoms, while the dashed circles donate the profile of atoms with residual strains [26]. (c) Projection of one of the employed special quasi-random structure (SQS) supercells onto the (100) plane. The black arrows indicate the nearest neighbor bonds for the Mn atoms that are used to extract the distribution of the local bond distortions, as shown in (d). In (d), the first principles-computed lattice distortion histogram of Mn bonds in FeCoNiCrMn is based on 1500 evaluated Mn bonds. The theoretical data are further analyzed by Gaussian fits (see the text for details). The experimentally measured averaged distortion is indicated by the red solid line. Although the mean distortion is rather small (<0.5%), the range of local distortions at the standard deviation is significant (≈2%), as indicated in (d) [27]. (e) Comparison of the first peak of the radial distribution function on Ni and FeNiCrCoCu (the inset on the right is the full width at half maximum of the first peak of the radial distribution function) [28]. (f) Atomic volume in A3 for different atomic species (Fe, Ni, Cr, Co, and Cu for the HEA, Ni for pure Ni) in the final steady state. The inset on the right is the average atomic volume of pure Ni and the HEA [28].
Coatings 16 00082 g002
Figure 3. (a) The curves of thermal diffusivity of pure aluminum and high-entropy alloys with temperature change. Compositions of HEA-a, HEA-b, HEA-c, and HEA-d are Al0.3CrFe1.5MnNi0.5, Al0.5CrFe1.5MnNi0.5, Al0.3CrFe1.5MnNi0.5Mo0.1, and Al0.3CrFe1.5MnNi0.5Mo0.1, respectively [34]. (b) Schematic diagram of the variation in lattice potential energy and mean difference (MD) during the migration of a Ni atom in different matrices [35]. (c) Comparison among the evaluated diagonal inter diffusivities for Al, Co, Cr, and Ni in the diffusion multiples annealed for 46 h at 1273 K, 1323 K, and 1373 K, respectively, where Fe is taken as the dependent component [36].
Figure 3. (a) The curves of thermal diffusivity of pure aluminum and high-entropy alloys with temperature change. Compositions of HEA-a, HEA-b, HEA-c, and HEA-d are Al0.3CrFe1.5MnNi0.5, Al0.5CrFe1.5MnNi0.5, Al0.3CrFe1.5MnNi0.5Mo0.1, and Al0.3CrFe1.5MnNi0.5Mo0.1, respectively [34]. (b) Schematic diagram of the variation in lattice potential energy and mean difference (MD) during the migration of a Ni atom in different matrices [35]. (c) Comparison among the evaluated diagonal inter diffusivities for Al, Co, Cr, and Ni in the diffusion multiples annealed for 46 h at 1273 K, 1323 K, and 1373 K, respectively, where Fe is taken as the dependent component [36].
Coatings 16 00082 g003
Figure 4. Structural diversity of the HEC family. The central image shows a supercell of an HEC rock salt structure; anions are dark gray spheres and cations are randomly distributed. The unit cells are based on HECs that have been successfully fabricated [8].
Figure 4. Structural diversity of the HEC family. The central image shows a supercell of an HEC rock salt structure; anions are dark gray spheres and cations are randomly distributed. The unit cells are based on HECs that have been successfully fabricated [8].
Coatings 16 00082 g004
Figure 5. Mechanism schematic diagram of equipment: (a) magnetron sputtering [55], (b) HiPIMS [49], (c) arc ion-plated [56], (d) multi-arc ion plating [57], (e) filtered cathode vacuum arc deposition [58], and (f) ion-beam-assisted deposition [59].
Figure 5. Mechanism schematic diagram of equipment: (a) magnetron sputtering [55], (b) HiPIMS [49], (c) arc ion-plated [56], (d) multi-arc ion plating [57], (e) filtered cathode vacuum arc deposition [58], and (f) ion-beam-assisted deposition [59].
Coatings 16 00082 g005
Figure 9. The high magnification image of TiAlSiN coatings deposited at (a) 50 A, (b) 60 A, and (c) 70 A [77]. SEM images of the cross-section of Cr coating samples with (d) 120 A and (e) 150 A [78]. Surface roughness analysis of the AlCrN coatings, deposited at the arc current of (f) substrate; (g) 120 A; (h) 150 A; and (i) 180 A [79].
Figure 9. The high magnification image of TiAlSiN coatings deposited at (a) 50 A, (b) 60 A, and (c) 70 A [77]. SEM images of the cross-section of Cr coating samples with (d) 120 A and (e) 150 A [78]. Surface roughness analysis of the AlCrN coatings, deposited at the arc current of (f) substrate; (g) 120 A; (h) 150 A; and (i) 180 A [79].
Coatings 16 00082 g009
Figure 10. Schematic diagram of corrosion and wear failure modes of films [83,84].
Figure 10. Schematic diagram of corrosion and wear failure modes of films [83,84].
Coatings 16 00082 g010
Figure 12. Wear test results showing (a) coefficient of friction vs. sliding distance plots of (AlCrTiMoV)N and TiN coatings and (b) wear track cross-sections. Specific wear rates of (c) (AlCrTiMoV)N and TiN coatings. SEM images of wear tracks of (d,e) (AlCrTiMoV)N coating, A: coating and ball debris, B: coating debris, C: nitride matrix, and (f,g) TiN coating [101].
Figure 12. Wear test results showing (a) coefficient of friction vs. sliding distance plots of (AlCrTiMoV)N and TiN coatings and (b) wear track cross-sections. Specific wear rates of (c) (AlCrTiMoV)N and TiN coatings. SEM images of wear tracks of (d,e) (AlCrTiMoV)N coating, A: coating and ball debris, B: coating debris, C: nitride matrix, and (f,g) TiN coating [101].
Coatings 16 00082 g012
Figure 13. The morphology of (a) Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy, and (b) TiN/ZrN coating after salt spray corrosion. (c) SEM image of Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy after salt spray corrosion for 576 h. (d) SEM image of TiN/ZrN coating after salt spray corrosion for 576 h. (e) Schematic diagram of the corrosion process of TiN/ZrN coating in salt spray environment [83].
Figure 13. The morphology of (a) Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy, and (b) TiN/ZrN coating after salt spray corrosion. (c) SEM image of Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy after salt spray corrosion for 576 h. (d) SEM image of TiN/ZrN coating after salt spray corrosion for 576 h. (e) Schematic diagram of the corrosion process of TiN/ZrN coating in salt spray environment [83].
Coatings 16 00082 g013
Figure 14. (a) Oxidation rate curves at 800 °C of the substrate and the samples processed at different multi-arc currents [77]. Microstructures of oxide scales of AlMo0.5NbTa0.5TiZr alloy oxidized at 1000 °C for 10 h: (b) general view and (cf) enlarged fragments [117].
Figure 14. (a) Oxidation rate curves at 800 °C of the substrate and the samples processed at different multi-arc currents [77]. Microstructures of oxide scales of AlMo0.5NbTa0.5TiZr alloy oxidized at 1000 °C for 10 h: (b) general view and (cf) enlarged fragments [117].
Coatings 16 00082 g014
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, H.; Mi, B.; Wang, J.; Chen, T.; Ma, X.; Liu, P.; Li, W. Research Progress of High-Entropy Ceramic Films via Arc Ion Plating. Coatings 2026, 16, 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings16010082

AMA Style

Chen H, Mi B, Wang J, Chen T, Ma X, Liu P, Li W. Research Progress of High-Entropy Ceramic Films via Arc Ion Plating. Coatings. 2026; 16(1):82. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings16010082

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Haoran, Baosen Mi, Jingjing Wang, Tianju Chen, Xun Ma, Ping Liu, and Wei Li. 2026. "Research Progress of High-Entropy Ceramic Films via Arc Ion Plating" Coatings 16, no. 1: 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings16010082

APA Style

Chen, H., Mi, B., Wang, J., Chen, T., Ma, X., Liu, P., & Li, W. (2026). Research Progress of High-Entropy Ceramic Films via Arc Ion Plating. Coatings, 16(1), 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings16010082

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop