Next Article in Journal
Frenkel-Poole Mechanism Unveils Black Diamond as Quasi-Epsilon-Near-Zero Surface
Next Article in Special Issue
Pixelated Micropolarizer Array Based on Carbon Nanotube Films
Previous Article in Journal
Equipment of Vertically-Ordered Mesoporous Silica Film on Electrochemically Pretreated Three-Dimensional Graphene Electrodes for Sensitive Detection of Methidazine in Urine
Previous Article in Special Issue
Green Extraction of Graphene from Natural Mineral Shungite
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Current Trends in Nanomaterials for Metal Oxide-Based Conductometric Gas Sensors: Advantages and Limitations—Part 2: Porous 2D Nanomaterials

by
Ghenadii Korotcenkov
1,* and
Valeri P. Tolstoy
2
1
Department of Physics and Engineering, Moldova State University, 2009 Chisinau, Moldova
2
Institute of Chemistry, Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg 198504, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2023, 13(2), 237; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13020237
Submission received: 12 December 2022 / Revised: 1 January 2023 / Accepted: 2 January 2023 / Published: 5 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 2D Materials for Advanced Sensors: Fabrication and Applications)

Abstract

This article discusses the features of the synthesis and application of porous two-dimensional nanomaterials in developing conductometric gas sensors based on metal oxides. It is concluded that using porous 2D nanomaterials and 3D structures based on them is a promising approach to improving the parameters of gas sensors, such as sensitivity and the rate of response. The limitations that may arise when using 2D structures in gas sensors intended for the sensor market are considered.
Keywords: nanoflakes; nanosheets; nanoplates; nanoflowers; porosification; annealing; phase transition; nanoholes; sensor response; rate of response nanoflakes; nanosheets; nanoplates; nanoflowers; porosification; annealing; phase transition; nanoholes; sensor response; rate of response

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Korotcenkov, G.; Tolstoy, V.P. Current Trends in Nanomaterials for Metal Oxide-Based Conductometric Gas Sensors: Advantages and Limitations—Part 2: Porous 2D Nanomaterials. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 237. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13020237

AMA Style

Korotcenkov G, Tolstoy VP. Current Trends in Nanomaterials for Metal Oxide-Based Conductometric Gas Sensors: Advantages and Limitations—Part 2: Porous 2D Nanomaterials. Nanomaterials. 2023; 13(2):237. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13020237

Chicago/Turabian Style

Korotcenkov, Ghenadii, and Valeri P. Tolstoy. 2023. "Current Trends in Nanomaterials for Metal Oxide-Based Conductometric Gas Sensors: Advantages and Limitations—Part 2: Porous 2D Nanomaterials" Nanomaterials 13, no. 2: 237. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13020237

APA Style

Korotcenkov, G., & Tolstoy, V. P. (2023). Current Trends in Nanomaterials for Metal Oxide-Based Conductometric Gas Sensors: Advantages and Limitations—Part 2: Porous 2D Nanomaterials. Nanomaterials, 13(2), 237. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13020237

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop