Objectives: To examine the effects of glucagon-like-peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RAs) on diabetic retinopathy (DR) progression, visual acuity (VA), central subfield thickness (CST), and response to intravitreal injections (IVIs) in the Hadassah ophthalmological cohort.
Methods: Of 4500 Hadassah patients with DR, 146 had a
[...] Read more.
Objectives: To examine the effects of glucagon-like-peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RAs) on diabetic retinopathy (DR) progression, visual acuity (VA), central subfield thickness (CST), and response to intravitreal injections (IVIs) in the Hadassah ophthalmological cohort.
Methods: Of 4500 Hadassah patients with DR, 146 had a documented first course of GLP1-RA treatment lasting at least a year along with ophthalmological follow-up. Of these, 35 underwent at least two optical coherence tomography (OCT) exams with a one-year interval. These 35 GLP1-RA–naïve patients were compared to a control group of 31 patients with DR who did not receive GLP1-RA treatment. We compared demographics, medical records, ocular data, and OCT characteristics between the two study groups.
Results: At baseline, patients who received GLP1-RA treatment had a significantly higher prevalence of retinal detachment and vitreous hemorrhage, as well as a higher (though not statistically significant) prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidities compared to the control group. At the end of the follow-up period, the GLP1-RA group had a higher prevalence of DR progression compared to controls (3/19 vs. 0/20, respectively;
p = 0.106, Fisher’s exact test), but also showed a better response to IVIs (27/35 vs. 17/31, respectively; unadjusted OR: 2.78,
p = 0.058; 95% CI: [0.963, 8.020], Pearson’s chi-square test). However, vitreous hemorrhage and hyperreflective retinal foci were confounding factors (adjusted IVI response OR: 1.76,
p = 0.229, 95% CI: [0.553, 5.650], logistic regression). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of change in visual acuity (−0.135 vs. −0.063 logMAR, respectively;
p = 0.664, Student’s
t-test) or CST (−13.49 vs. −30.13 μm;
p = 0.464, Student’s
t-test).
Conclusions: This study presents preliminary findings showing no significant differences in DR progression, visual acuity, and CST between patients treated with GLP1-RA and control patients. Moreover, GLP1-RA therapy was not significantly associated with improved IVI response, with ocular parameters acting as confounding factors.
Full article