Skip to Content
Brain SciencesBrain Sciences
  • Review
  • Open Access

9 October 2024

16 Pages

Autoimmune Encephalitis and Paraneoplastic Neurological Syndromes with Progressive Supranuclear Palsy-like Manifestations

,
,
and
Department of Neurology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu 501-1194, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Abstract

Background: Advances in diagnostic procedures have led to an increasing rate of diagnosis of autoimmune encephalitis or paraneoplastic neurological syndrome (AE/PNS) among patients with progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP)-like manifestations. Methods: In this narrative review, we first discuss the clinical characteristics of AE/PNS in comparison to those of PSP, followed by a discussion of diagnosis and treatment. Results: The antibodies involved in these conditions include anti-IgLON5, -Ma2, and -Ri antibodies, each of which has a characteristic clinical presentation. The steps in the diagnosis of AE/PNS in patients with PSP-like manifestations include (i) suspicion of AE/PNS based on clinical presentations atypical of PSP and (ii) antibody detection measures. Methods used to identify antibodies include a combination of tissue-based assays and confirmatory tests. The primary confirmatory tests include cell-based assays and immunoblotting. Treatments can be divided into immunotherapy and tumor therapies, the former of which includes acute and maintenance therapies. Conclusions: One of the major challenges of diagnosis is that existing reports on PSP-like patients with AE/PNS include only case reports, with the majority discussing antibodies other than anti-IgLON5 antibody. As such, more patients need to be evaluated to establish the relationship between antibodies and PSP-like manifestations.

1. Introduction

Progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), first described by Steele, Richardson, and Olszewski in 1964, is believed to be caused by tauopathy, where gain of toxic function is caused by tau aggregates formed through aberrant post-translational modifications, such as excessive phosphorylation, and loss of function occurs due to a reduction in normal tau function [1]. Tauopathies are classified into three-repeat (3R) tauopathies, which have three repeat sequences in the microtubular-binding domain of tau protein, four-repeat (4R) tauopathies, which have four, and 3R/4R tauopathies, which have both. PSP is a representative disease of 4R tauopathies [2]. PSP typically presents with vertical supranuclear gaze palsy, repeated falls within 3 years, a more rapid progression than Parkinson’s disease, and a resistance to levodopa therapy; however, attention is necessary as multiple clinical variants have been reported [3,4]. Clinical diagnosis is currently made using the Movement Disorder Society clinical diagnostic criteria for PSP (MDS-PSP criteria) (Table 1) [5]. As diseases that present with PSP syndrome are diverse, including hereditary disorders, prion diseases, cerebrovascular diseases, infections, and, notably, autoimmune disorders, thorough differential diagnosis is crucial [6,7]. The gold standard for diagnosis of PSP is a pathological diagnosis, in which two criteria are currently used [8,9]. There is no established effective treatment, and management primarily consists of levodopa trials and rehabilitation.
Table 1. Brief overview of MDS-PSP criteria.
Recently, the importance of autoimmune encephalitis (AE) and paraneoplastic neurological syndrome (PNS) as mimics of Parkinsonian syndromes, including PSP, has been increasingly recognized [10,11]. The pathogenesis of AE/PNS is thought to be divided into two types: humoral- and cellular-immunity-driven [12]. Pathogenic autoantibodies are present in disorders predominantly caused by humoral immunity. Autoantibodies can also exist in many cellular-immunity-mediated cases, although most are considered secondary occurrences without pathological significance. Over the past decade, advances in antibody identification techniques, such as cell-based assays (CBA), immunoprecipitation methods, and protein microarrays, have led to the discovery of many novel autoantibodies that can cause AE/PNS, some of which have been associated with symptoms and signs that imitate PSP. Although pathophysiological similarities of PSP and AE/PNS have not been elucidated, neuroinflammation is increasingly recognized as an important aspect of PSP. Site and intensity of neuroinflammation were correlated with tau pathology [13] and clinical severity [14] on positron emission tomography; and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytokines suggesting microglial activation including tumor necrosis factor alpha, interleukin (IL)-1β, and IL-6 were elevated in PSP patients compared to controls [15].
As AE/PNS can be treated with immunotherapies and tumor therapies, clinicians should differentiate between these conditions. In this review, we discuss mainly the following topics: (i) clinical features of AE/PNS mimicking PSP in comparison to PSP and (ii) the diagnosis and management of PSP-like AE/PNS.

2. Methods

We performed a narrative review of articles retrieved from the PubMed database (search date: 18 June 2024) using the following search string: ((progressive supranuclear palsy [MeSH Terms] OR “progressive supranuclear pals*” [Title/Abstract] OR PSPRS [Title/Abstract] OR “Richardson* syndrome” [Title/Abstract] OR “progressive gait freezing” [Title/Abstract] OR “pure akinesia with gait freezing” [Title/Abstract]) AND (antibod*[Title/Abstract] OR autoantibod*[Title/Abstract] OR immunolog*[Title/Abstract] OR autoimmune*[Title/Abstract] OR immune*[Title/Abstract] OR neoplas*[Title/Abstract] OR paraneoplas*[Title/Abstract])) AND ((english[Language]) OR (japanese[Language])). The inclusion period was unlimited. A total of 334 articles matched the search criteria, from which 37 case reports, case series, clinical studies, reviews, and basic research articles regarding AE/PNS causing PSP-like manifestations (at least one of the following: vertical supranuclear gaze palsy, frequent falls, postural instability, or gait freezing, which are not clearly explained by other etiologies; or the decision of these authors if details are unclear) were selected. Furthermore, an additional 32 articles were identified by manual searching and referring to bibliographies.

4. Diagnosis of AE/PNS Mimicking PSP

4.1. Suspecting AE/PNS Mimicking PSP

From the perspective that it is a treatable condition, it is essential to actively consider the possibility of AE/PNS when encountering PSP-like clinical symptoms. AE/PNS should be suspected in patients with manifestations atypical for PSP (Table 3). The key diagnostic clues are as follows: young age of onset (<40 years of age), acute or subacute disease course, coexisting neoplasms, CSF abnormalities (elevated protein, pleocytosis, increased IgG index, and positive CSF-specific OCB), and brain MRI with no findings typical of PSP (e.g., atrophy of the midbrain tegmentum or superior cerebellar peduncle). It is also important to note the characteristic findings of each antibody, which include significant sleep disorders, behavioral manifestations, respiratory failure, and orthostatic hypotension in anti-IgLON5 disease; narcolepsy in the presence of anti-Ma2 antibody; and diarrhea and severe weight loss in diseases associated with anti-DPPX antibody [11].
Table 3. Clinical features suggestive of AE/PNS mimicking PSP.

4.2. Confirmation of Diagnosis

4.2.1. General Considerations

If an AE/PNS mimicking PSP is suspected, laboratory assessments and considerations of clinical information are necessary for establishing the diagnosis.

4.2.2. Laboratory Assessments

Laboratory assessments can be achieved in two steps: a tissue-based assay (TBA) and a confirmatory test. One of two different confirmatory tests can be performed, depending on the target antibodies. One is CBA, and the other is immunoblotting. Although the results of a TBA and a confirmatory test should essentially be concordant, if this is not the case, the sensitivity and specificity of each test must be considered [44,53,54,55,56].

4.2.3. Considerations of Clinical Information

In addition to laboratory results, it is often necessary to confirm that the clinical course is typical [44,57]. However, the number of reported patients with AE/PNS mimicking PSP is not sufficiently large to establish these PSP-like manifestations as true clinical entities, particularly for antibodies other than anti-IgLON5. Therefore, careful differential diagnosis is important. When the results are uncertain, first-line treatment can be considered for diagnostic purposes.

5. Management of AE/PNS Mimicking PSP

5.1. General Principles

Immunotherapy and the management of neoplasms are the mainstays of treatment. As there is no treatment with a high level of evidence for AE/PNS mimicking PSP, commonly recommended treatments for AE/PNS are typically followed [58,59,60,61]. Immunotherapy can be divided into acute and maintenance therapies.

5.2. Acute Immunotherapies

5.2.1. First-Line Therapies

The first-line acute therapy is often intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP), either alone or in combination with IVIG or plasmapheresis. The regimen for a single cycle comprises 1000 mg of intravenous methylprednisolone for three days for IVMP; 2 g/kg divided into five days for IVIG; and five to ten sessions of therapeutic plasma exchange every alternate day for plasmapheresis.

5.2.2. Second-Line Therapies

If these treatments are deemed inadequate at follow-up performed two to four weeks following the completion of acute treatment, RTX or cyclophosphamide is considered as a second-line therapy [59]. However, it is crucial to re-evaluate the diagnosis before initiating these therapies, particularly when the first-line therapies are completely ineffective or laboratory tests are indeterminate. RTX can be administered at a dose of 375 mg/m2 four times weekly, whereas cyclophosphamide can be administered at 600–1000 mg/m2 monthly for up to six months.

5.3. Maintenance Immunotherapies

In cases without recurrence, oral corticosteroids can be prescribed as a bridging therapy, with tapering over several months; long-term maintenance therapy is not common. On the other hand, maintenance therapy can be considered in patients who test positive for cell-surface antibodies and experience recurrence [60,61]. An important point to note is that a higher level of diagnostic uncertainty in patients with AE/PNS mimicking PSP necessitates a thorough differential diagnosis before starting maintenance therapies.
When conducting maintenance therapies, the common regimen includes either periodic RTX alone, or azathioprine (AZA) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) with oral corticosteroids tapered over three to six months as a bridging therapy. Periodic RTX can also be administered at a dose of 375 mg/m2 every four to six months. AZA can be administered initially at a dose of 1.5 mg/kg/day titrated to 2–3 mg/kg/day over one to several months, while MMF is initially dosed at 500 mg twice daily, increasing to 1000 mg twice daily after two weeks. The duration of maintenance treatment can initially be considered as three years [60].

5.4. Tumor Therapies

Coexisting neoplasms should be treated simultaneously. If a related tumor is detected, complete resection can be initially considered. If this is not possible, debulking surgery, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy should be considered.

6. AE/PNS Associated with Other Atypical Parkinsonism

AE/PNS can also present with manifestations resembling those of corticobasal syndrome (CBS) and multiple system atrophy (MSA).
First, in CBS-like cases, when limiting to those with multiple reported patients, anti-IgLON5 (two patients) [16,62] and anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) antibodies (four patients) [63,64] have been documented. The range of age was 49 to 78 years, and all cases exhibited chronic progression. Key factors for differential diagnosis from neurodegenerative CBS included CSF abnormalities throughout all the antibody types; dystonia-like muscle stiffness, muscle spasms, and paraspinal muscle hypertrophy in the diseases associated with anti-GAD antibody; and leg-predominant apraxia in the ones related to anti-IgLON5 antibody. The majority of these patients had effective immunotherapy.
Next, as for MSA-mimicking diseases, also focusing on those with two or more reported patients, anti-contactin-associated protein 2 (Caspr2) (two patients) [65], anti-CV2/CRMP5 (two patients) [66,67], and anti-Homer-3 antibodies (two patients) [68] were identified. The age ranged from 48 to 72 years. Differentiating factors from MSA across all these antibodies included subacute-to-acute clinical progression and CSF abnormalities. Specific distinguishing features associated with anti-Caspr2 antibodies included a variety of symptoms such as hyponatremia, neuropathy, encephalopathy, hallucinations, and epilepsy, while no distinctive features were reported for anti-CV2/CRMP5 and anti-Homer-3 antibodies. Immunotherapy was effective in most cases.

7. Conclusions and Future Directions

With advances in antibody detection technologies, autoimmune parkinsonism has become attractive as a treatable condition. When we encounter a patient with PSP-like syndromes, the possibility of an autoimmune disease should always be considered, rather than simply assuming that the symptoms are caused by PSP as a neurodegenerative disease. However, as yet, the association between AE/PNS and PSP-like manifestations has not been adequately proven. Antibody detection assays unfortunately have a relatively high risk of presenting with false-positive and false-negative results. Moreover, only a single or handful of PSP-like patients have been described in detail for all antibodies, except for the anti-IgLON5 antibody. The accumulation of patients with similar clinical courses is essential to overcome these problems.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.Y. and T.S.; methodology, N.Y.; validation, A.T., A.K. and T.S.; writing—original draft preparation, N.Y.; writing—review and editing, A.T., A.K. and T.S.; supervision, A.T.; project administration, T.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Stamelou, M.; Respondek, G.; Giagkou, N.; Whitwell, J.L.; Kovacs, G.G.; Höglinger, G.U. Evolving concepts in progressive supranuclear palsy and other 4-repeat tauopathies. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2021, 17, 601–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  2. Creekmore, B.C.; Watanabe, R.; Lee, E.B. Neurodegenerative disease tauopathies. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 2024, 19, 345–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  3. Steele, J.C.; Richardson, J.C.; Olszewski, J. Progressive supranuclear palsy. A heterogeneous degeneration involving the brain stem, basal ganglia and cerebellum with vertical gaze and pseudobulbar palsy, nuchal dystonia and dementia. Arch. Neurol. 1964, 10, 333–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  4. Greene, P. Progressive supranuclear palsy, corticobasal degeneration, and multiple system atrophy. Continuum 2019, 25, 919–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  5. Höglinger, G.U.; Respondek, G.; Stamelou, M.; Kurz, C.; Josephs, K.A.; Lang, A.E.; Mollenhauer, B.; Müller, U.; Nilsson, C.; Whitwell, J.L.; et al. Clinical diagnosis of progressive supranuclear palsy: The movement disorder society criteria. Mov. Disord. 2017, 32, 853–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  6. Necpál, J.; Borsek, M.; Jeleňová, B. PSP-Richardson syndrome mimics: An overview and pragmatic approach. Rev. Neurol. 2024, 180, 12–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  7. Krzosek, P.; Madetko, N.; Migda, A.; Migda, B.; Jaguś, D.; Alster, P. Differential diagnosis of rare subtypes of progressive supranuclear palsy and PSP-like syndromes-infrequent manifestations of the most common form of atypical parkinsonism. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2022, 14, 804385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  8. Hauw, J.J.; Daniel, S.E.; Dickson, D.; Horoupian, D.S.; Jellinger, K.; Lantos, P.L.; McKee, A.; Tabaton, M.; Litvan, I. Preliminary NINDS neuropathologic criteria for Steele-Richardson-Olszewski syndrome (progressive supranuclear palsy). Neurology 1994, 44, 2015–2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  9. Roemer, S.F.; Grinberg, L.T.; Crary, J.F.; Seeley, W.W.; McKee, A.C.; Kovacs, G.G.; Beach, T.G.; Duyckaerts, C.; Ferrer, I.A.; Gelpi, E.; et al. Rainwater Charitable Foundation criteria for the neuropathologic diagnosis of progressive supranuclear palsy. Acta Neuropathol. 2022, 144, 603–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  10. Honorat, J.A.; McKeon, A. Autoimmune movement disorders: A clinical and laboratory approach. Curr. Neurol. Neurosci. Rep. 2017, 17, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  11. Yamahara, N.; Kimura, A.; Shimohata, T. Autoimmune encephalitis and paraneoplastic neurological syndromes presenting atypical parkinsonism: A scoping review. Rinsho Shinkeigaku 2023, 63, 497–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  12. Dalmau, J.; Graus, F. Antibody-mediated encephalitis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 378, 840–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  13. Malpetti, M.; Passamonti, L.; Rittman, T.; Jones, P.S.; Vázquez Rodríguez, P.; Bevan-Jones, W.R.; Hong, Y.T.; Fryer, T.D.; Aigbirhio, F.I.; O’Brien, J.T.; et al. Neuroinflammation and tau colocalize in vivo in progressive supranuclear palsy. Ann. Neurol. 2020, 88, 1194–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  14. Malpetti, M.; Passamonti, L.; Jones, P.S.; Street, D.; Rittman, T.; Fryer, T.D.; Hong, Y.T.; Vàsquez Rodriguez, P.; Bevan-Jones, W.R.; Aigbirhio, F.I.; et al. Neuroinflammation predicts disease progression in progressive supranuclear palsy. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2021, 92, 769–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  15. Starhof, C.; Winge, K.; Heegaard, N.H.H.; Skogstrand, K.; Friis, S.; Hejl, A. Cerebrospinal fluid pro-inflammatory cytokines differentiate parkinsonian syndromes. J. Neuroinflamm. 2018, 15, 305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  16. Gaig, C.; Compta, Y.; Heidbreder, A.; Marti, M.J.; Titulaer, M.J.; Crijnen, Y.; Hogl, B.; Lewerenz, J.; Erro, M.E.; Garcia-Monco, J.C.; et al. Frequency and characterization of movement disorders in anti-IgLON5 disease. Neurology 2021, 97, e1367–e1381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  17. Kannoth, S.; Anandakkuttan, A.; Mathai, A.; Sasikumar, A.N.; Nambiar, V. Autoimmune atypical parkinsonism—A group of treatable parkinsonism. J. Neurol. Sci. 2016, 362, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  18. Dale, M.L.; Erten-Lyons, D.; Bittner, F.; Woltjer, R. Chronic meningoencephalitis with mixed pathology mimics progressive supranuclear palsy. BMJ Case Rep. 2018, 11, e227119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  19. Inoue, K.; Kitamura, J.; Yoneda, M.; Imamura, E.; Tokinobu, H. Hashimoto’s encephalopathy presenting with micrographia as a typical feature of parkinsonism. Neurol. Sci. 2012, 33, 395–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  20. Kikuchi, A.; Yoneda, M.; Hasegawa, T.; Matsunaga, A.; Ikawa, M.; Nakamura, T.; Ezura, M.; Baba, T.; Sugeno, N.; Ishiyama, S.; et al. High prevalence of serum anti-NH2-terminal of alpha-enolase antibodies in patients with multiple system atrophy and corticobasal syndrome. J. Neurol. 2021, 268, 4291–4295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  21. Ono, Y.; Kimura, A.; Shimohata, T. Pathogenesis, clinical features and treatment of anti-IgLON5 disease. Clin. Exp. Neuroimmunol. 2023, 14, 167–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  22. Gaig, C.; Sabater, L. New knowledge on anti-IgLON5 disease. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 2024, 37, 316–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  23. Gaig, C.; Graus, F.; Compta, Y.; Hogl, B.; Bataller, L.; Bruggemann, N.; Giordana, C.; Heidbreder, A.; Kotschet, K.; Lewerenz, J.; et al. Clinical manifestations of the anti-IgLON5 disease. Neurology 2017, 88, 1736–1743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  24. Grüter, T.; Möllers, F.E.; Tietz, A.; Dargvainiene, J.; Melzer, N.; Heidbreder, A.; Strippel, C.; Kraft, A.; Hoftberger, R.; Schoberl, F.; et al. Clinical, serological and genetic predictors of response to immunotherapy in anti-IgLON5 disease. Brain 2023, 146, 600–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  25. Cabezudo-Garcia, P.; Mena-Vazquez, N.; Estivill Torrus, G.; Serrano-Castro, P. Response to immunotherapy in anti-IgLON5 disease: A systematic review. Acta Neurol. Scand. 2020, 141, 263–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  26. Sabater, L.; Gaig, C.; Gelpi, E.; Bataller, L.; Lewerenz, J.; Torres-Vega, E.; Contreras, A.; Giometto, B.; Compta, Y.; Embid, C.; et al. A novel non-rapid-eye movement and rapid-eye-movement parasomnia with sleep breathing disorder associated with antibodies to IgLON5: A case series, characterisation of the antigen, and post-mortem study. Lancet Neurol. 2014, 13, 575–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  27. Tobin, W.O.; Lennon, V.A.; Komorowski, L.; Probst, C.; Clardy, S.L.; Aksamit, A.J.; Appendino, J.P.; Lucchinetti, C.F.; Matsumoto, J.Y.; Pittock, S.J.; et al. DPPX potassium channel antibody: Frequency, clinical accompaniments, and outcomes in 20 patients. Neurology 2014, 83, 1797–1803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  28. González-Ávila, C.; Casado, L.; Muro García, I.; Villacieros-Álvarez, J.; Vivancos, J.; Quintas, S. Altered ioflupane single-photon emission computed tomography in anti-IgLON5 disease: A new case mimicking probable progressive supranuclear palsy and review of the literature. Eur. J. Neurol. 2021, 28, 1392–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  29. Berger-Sieczkowski, E.; Endmayr, V.; Haider, C.; Ricken, G.; Jauk, P.; Macher, S.; Pirker, W.; Hogl, B.; Heidbreder, A.; Schnider, P.; et al. Analysis of inflammatory markers and tau deposits in an autopsy series of nine patients with anti-IgLON5 disease. Acta Neuropathol. 2023, 146, 631–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  30. Hierro, X.M.; Rojas, G.; Aldinio, V.; Bres-Bullrich, M.; Da-Prat, G.; Ebner, R.; Gatto, E.M. Moaning phenomenon and rapidly progressive dementia in Anti LGI-1 associated progressive supranuclear palsy syndrome. Tremor Other Hyperkinetic Mov. 2020, 10, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  31. Borsche, M.; Hahn, S.; Hanssen, H.; Münchau, A.; Wandinger, K.P.; Brüggemann, N. Sez6l2-antibody-associated progressive cerebellar ataxia: A differential diagnosis of atypical parkinsonism. J. Neurol. 2019, 266, 522–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  32. Dash, D.; Choudhary, R.; Ramanujam, B.; Vasantha, P.M.; Tripathi, M. Paraneoplastic syndrome mimicking progressive supranuclear palsy. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2016, 32, 162–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  33. Ohyagi, M.; Ishibashi, S.; Ohkubo, T.; Kobayashi, Z.; Mizusawa, H.; Yokota, T.; Emoto, H.; Kiyosawa, M. Subacute supranuclear palsy in anti-Hu paraneoplastic encephalitis. Can. J. Neurol. Sci. 2017, 44, 444–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  34. Vogrig, A.; Péricart, S.; Pinto, A.L.; Rogemond, V.; Muñiz-Castrillo, S.; Picard, G.; Selton, M.; Mittelbronn, M.; Lanoiselee, H.M.; Michenet, P.; et al. Immunopathogenesis and proposed clinical score for identifying Kelch-like protein-11 encephalitis. Brain Commun. 2021, 3, fcab185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  35. Adams, C.; McKeon, A.; Silber, M.H.; Kumar, R. Narcolepsy, REM sleep behavior disorder, and supranuclear gaze palsy associated with Ma1 and Ma2 antibodies and tonsillar carcinoma. Arch. Neurol. 2011, 68, 521–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  36. Sankhla, C.; Gursahani, R.; Shah, N. Progressive supranuclear palsy phenotypic presentation associated with anti MA2 antibody. Acta Neurol. Belg. 2024, 124, 709–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  37. Takkar, A.; Mehta, S.; Gupta, N.; Bansal, S.; Lal, V. Anti-RI antibody associated progressive supranuclear palsy like presentation in a patient with breast carcinoma. J. Neuroimmunol. 2020, 347, 577345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  38. Mangesius, S.; Sprenger, F.; Hoftberger, R.; Seppi, K.; Reindl, M.; Poewe, W. IgLON5 autoimmunity tested negative in patients with progressive supranuclear palsy and corticobasal syndrome. Park. Relat. Disord. 2017, 38, 102–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  39. Flanagan, E.P. Paraneoplastic disorders of the nervous system. Continuum 2020, 26, 1602–1628. [Google Scholar]
  40. Dalmau, J.; Graus, F.; Villarejo, A.; Posner, J.B.; Blumenthal, D.; Thiessen, B.; Saiz, A.; Meneses, P.; Rosenfeld, M.R. Clinical analysis of anti-Ma2-associated encephalitis. Brain 2004, 127, 1831–1844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  41. Li, L.; Guo, Y.; Wang, J. Detection of paraneoplastic antibodies and their significance in paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes: A narrative review. Ann. Transl. Med. 2023, 11, 283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  42. Déchelotte, B.; Muñiz-Castrillo, S.; Joubert, B.; Vogrig, A.; Picard, G.; Rogemond, V.; Pinto, A.L.; Lombard, C.; Desestret, V.; Fabien, N.; et al. Diagnostic yield of commercial immunodots to diagnose paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes. Neurol. Neuroimmunol. Neuroinflamm. 2020, 7, e701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  43. Ebright, M.J.; Li, S.H.; Reynolds, E.; Burke, J.F.; Claytor, B.R.; Grisold, A.; Banerjee, M.; Callaghan, B.C. Unintended consequences of Mayo paraneoplastic evaluations. Neurology 2018, 91, e2057–e2066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  44. Graus, F.; Vogrig, A.; Muniz-Castrillo, S.; Antoine, J.G.; Desestret, V.; Dubey, D.; Giometto, B.; Irani, S.R.; Joubert, B.; Leypoldt, F.; et al. Updated diagnostic criteria for paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes. Neurol. Neuroimmunol. Neuroinflamm. 2021, 8, e1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  45. Simard, C.; Vogrig, A.; Joubert, B.; Muñiz-Castrillo, S.; Picard, G.; Rogemond, V.; Ducray, F.; Berzero, G.; Psimaras, D.; Antoine, J.C.; et al. Clinical spectrum and diagnostic pitfalls of neurologic syndromes with Ri antibodies. Neurol. Neuroimmunol. Neuroinflamm. 2020, 7, e699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  46. Pittock, S.J.; Lucchinetti, C.F.; Lennon, V.A. Anti-neuronal nuclear autoantibody type 2: Paraneoplastic accompaniments. Ann. Neurol. 2003, 53, 580–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  47. Wang, S.; Hou, H.; Tang, Y.; Zhang, S.; Wang, G.; Guo, Z.; Zhu, L.; Wu, J. An overview on CV2/CRMP5 antibody-associated paraneoplastic neurological syndromes. Neural. Regen. Res. 2023, 18, 2357–2364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  48. Graus, F.; Delattre, J.Y.; Antoine, J.C.; Dalmau, J.; Giometto, B.; Grisold, W.; Honnorat, J.; Smitt, P.S.; Vedeler, C.; Verschuuren, J.J.; et al. Recommended diagnostic criteria for paraneoplastic neurological syndromes. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2004, 75, 1135–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  49. Dubey, D.; Lennon, V.A.; Gadoth, A.; Pittock, S.J.; Flanagan, E.P.; Schmeling, J.E.; McKeon, A.; Klein, C.J. Autoimmune CRMP5 neuropathy phenotype and outcome defined from 105 cases. Neurology 2018, 90, e103–e110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  50. Vernino, S.; Tuite, P.; Adler, C.H.; Meschia, J.F.; Boeve, B.F.; Boasberg, P.; Parisi, J.E.; Lennon, V.A. Paraneoplastic chorea associated with CRMP-5 neuronal antibody and lung carcinoma. Ann. Neurol. 2002, 51, 625–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  51. Rogemond, V.; Honnorat, J. Anti-CV2 autoantibodies and paraneoplastic neurological syndromes. Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol. 2000, 19, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  52. Villagrán-García, M.; Farina, A.; Muñiz-Castrillo, S.; Wucher, V.; Dhairi, M.; Timestit, N.; Ciano-Petersen, N.L.; Vogrig, A.; Picard, G.; Benaiteau, M.; et al. Revisiting anti-Hu paraneoplastic autoimmunity: Phenotypic characterization and cancer diagnosis. Brain Commun. 2023, 5, fcad247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  53. Höftberger, R.; Dalmau, J.; Graus, F. Clinical neuropathology practice guide 5-2012: Updated guideline for the diagnosis of antineuronal antibodies. Clin. Neuropathol. 2012, 31, 337–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  54. Ricken, G.; Schwaiger, C.; De Simoni, D.; Pichler, V.; Lang, J.; Glatter, S.; Macher, S.; Rommer, P.S.; Scholze, P.; Kubista, H.; et al. Detection methods for autoantibodies in suspected autoimmune encephalitis. Front. Neurol. 2018, 9, 841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  55. Budhram, A.; Yang, L.; Bhayana, V.; Mills, J.R.; Dubey, D. Clinical sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of neural antibody testing for autoimmune encephalitis. J. Appl. Lab. Med. 2022, 7, 350–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  56. Fernández-Fournier, M.; Lacruz, L.; Nozal, P.; Chico, J.L.; Tallón Barranco, A.; Otero-Ortega, L.; Corral, I.; Carrasco, A. The study of neural antibodies in neurology: A practical summary. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 1043723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  57. Flanagan, E.P.; Geschwind, M.D.; Lopez-Chiriboga, A.S.; Blackburn, K.M.; Turaga, S.; Binks, S.; Zitser, J.; Gelfand, J.M.; Day, G.S.; Dunham, S.R.; et al. Autoimmune encephalitis misdiagnosis in adults. JAMA Neurol. 2023, 80, 30–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  58. Shin, Y.W.; Lee, S.T.; Park, K.I.; Jung, K.H.; Jung, K.Y.; Lee, S.K.; Chu, K. Treatment strategies for autoimmune encephalitis. Ther. Adv. Neurol. Disord. 2018, 11, 1756285617722347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  59. Abboud, H.; Probasco, J.C.; Irani, S.; Ances, B.; Benavides, D.R.; Bradshaw, M.; Christo, P.P.; Dale, R.C.; Fernandez-Fournier, M.; Flanagan, E.P.; et al. Autoimmune encephalitis: Proposed best practice recommendations for diagnosis and acute management. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2021, 92, 757–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  60. Abboud, H.; Probasco, J.; Irani, S.R.; Ances, B.; Benavides, D.R.; Bradshaw, M.; Christo, P.P.; Dale, R.C.; Fernandez-Fournier, M.; Flanagan, E.P.; et al. Autoimmune encephalitis: Proposed recommendations for symptomatic and long-term management. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2021, 92, 897–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  61. Mahadeen, A.Z.; Carlson, A.K.; Cohen, J.A.; Galioto, R.; Abbatemarco, J.R.; Kunchok, A. Review of the longitudinal management of autoimmune encephalitis, potential biomarkers, and novel therapeutics. Neurol. Clin. Pract. 2024, 14, e200306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  62. Fuseya, K.; Kimura, A.; Yoshikura, N.; Yamada, M.; Hayashi, Y.; Shimohata, T. Corticobasal Syndrome in a Patient with Anti-IgLON5 Antibodies. Mov. Disord. Clin. Pract. 2020, 7, 557–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  63. Bowen, L.N.; Subramony, S.H.; Heilman, K.M. Apraxia in anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase-associated stiff person syndrome: Link to corticobasal degeneration? Ann. Neurol. 2015, 77, 173–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  64. Balint, B.; Mahant, N.; Meinck, H.M.; Fung, V. Stiff limb syndrome mimicking corticobasal syndrome. Mov. Disord. Clin. Pract. 2014, 1, 354–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  65. Kannoth, S.; Nambiar, V.; Gopinath, S.; Anandakuttan, A.; Mathai, A.; Rajan, P.K. Expanding spectrum of contactin-associated protein 2 (CASPR2) autoimmunity-syndrome of parkinsonism and ataxia. Neurol. Sci. 2018, 39, 455–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  66. Tada, S.; Furuta, M.; Fukada, K.; Hirozawa, D.; Matsui, M.; Aoike, F.; Okuno, T.; Sawada, J.; Mochizuki, H.; Hazama, T. Severe parkinsonism associated with anti-CRMP5 antibody-positive paraneoplastic neurological syndrome and abnormal signal intensity in the bilateral basal ganglia. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2016, 87, 907–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  67. Yap, S.M.; Lynch, T.; MacMahon, P.; Murray, B. Paraneoplastic atypical parkinsonism with anti-CRMP5 antibodies and severe caudate and putaminal hypometabolism on 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography of the brain. Mov. Disord. Clin. Pract. 2017, 4, 263–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  68. Liu, M.; Ren, H.; Fan, S.; Zhang, W.; Xu, Y.; Zhao, W.; Guan, H.; Encephalitis Collaborative Group. Neurological autoimmunity associated with Homer-3 antibody: A case series from China. Neurol. Neuroimmunol. Neuroinflamm. 2021, 8, e1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.