Skip to Content
Applied SciencesApplied Sciences
  • Editorial
  • Open Access

4 July 2019

3 Pages

Preface of Special Issue on Laser Scanning

,
and
1
Interdepartmental Research Center of Geomatics (CIRGEO), TESAF Department, University of Padova, via dell’Università 16, 35020 Legnaro (PD), Italy
2
Finnish Geospatial Research Institute, National Land Survey of Finland, Geodeetinrinne 2, 02431 Masala, Finland
3
Department of Geography, University of Hawaiˈi at Mānoa, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This article belongs to the Special Issue Laser Scanning

1. Introduction

A laser is a spatially coherent light that can travel through space with very little diffraction. This distinctive feature makes lasers an ideal signal carrier for measuring distances. The special issue of “Laser Scanning” (also known as LiDAR—Light Detection and Ranging) provides several interesting reports on the wide range of applications that this technology supports. Laser scanning is so defined because it uses laser technology to detect objects and calculate distances between the sensor and the reflective surfaces. Reflected laser pulses provide a means for measuring time-of-flight, phase differences, and other properties of the reflected pulse and of the surface that causes a full or partial reflection. A strong added value of laser scanning is that it can provide multiple returns from a single emitted pulse, because of the partial obstruction of the laser beam. For several decades, accurate distance measures have been done with laser scanners as described above, and the technology is ever actively being improved. Recent developments include multi-wavelength scanners, solid-state LiDAR, single-photon LiDAR, and scanners with increased pulse frequency, thanks to solutions related to concurrent pulses in the air (multiple time around—MTA). Also the decreased weight of components allows sensors to be assembled into unmanned vehicles (e.g., Unmanned Aerial Vehicles—UAVs) [1,2].
Laser scanning applications covered in this special issue can be divided into the following categories: multi-wavelength LiDAR [3,4], mobile mapping support for indoor [5,6,7], outdoor, and other applications [8], object tracking and navigation [9,10,11], deformation monitoring [12,13], modelling and detection [14,15,16], geometric accuracy assessment [17,18,19], and hybrid technologies like LiDARgrammetry [20], which are summarized in more detail in the following section.

References

  1. Recent Developments in Airborne Lidar. Multispectral Laser Scanning, Single-photon Lidar, Hybrid Lidar, Recent Developments in Airborne Sensors and UAVs. Available online: https://www.gim-international.com/content/article/recent-developments-in-airborne-lidar-2 (accessed on 20 June 2019).
  2. Pirotti, F. The Role of Open Software and Standards in the Realm of Laser Scanning Technology. Open Geospatial Data Softw. Stand. 2019. [Google Scholar]
  3. Teo, T.A.; Wu, H.M. Analysis of Land Cover Classification Using Multi-Wavelength LiDAR System. Appl. Sci. 2017, 7, 663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  4. Morsy, S.; Shaker, A.; El-Rabbany, A. Using Multispectral Airborne LiDAR Data for Land/Water Discrimination: A Case Study at Lake Ontario, Canada. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  5. Masiero, A.; Fissore, F.; Guarnieri, A.; Pirotti, F.; Visintini, D.; Vettore, A. Performance Evaluation of Two Indoor Mapping Systems: Low-Cost UWB-Aided Photogrammetry and Backpack Laser Scanning. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  6. Tucci, G.; Visintini, D.; Bonora, V.; Parisi, E. Examination of Indoor Mobile Mapping Systems in a Diversified Internal/External Test Field. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  7. Macher, H.; Landes, T.; Grussenmeyer, P. From Point Clouds to Building Information Models: 3D Semi-Automatic Reconstruction of Indoors of Existing Buildings. Appl. Sci. 2017, 7, 1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  8. Li, L.; Liu, J.; Zuo, X.; Zhu, H. An Improved MbICP Algorithm for Mobile Robot Pose Estimation. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  9. Koppanyi, Z.; Toth, C.K. Object Tracking with LiDAR: Monitoring Taxiing and Landing Aircraft. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  10. Lüy, M.; Çam, E.; Ulamış, F.; Uzun, İ.; Akın, S. Initial Results of Testing a Multilayer Laser Scanner in a Collision Avoidance System for Light Rail Vehicles. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  11. Martínez, J.; Morán, M.; Morales, J.; Reina, A.; Zafra, M. Field Navigation Using Fuzzy Elevation Maps Built with Local 3D Laser Scans. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  12. Heinemann, T.; Becker, S. Axial Fan Blade Vibration Assessment under Inlet Cross-Flow Conditions Using Laser Scanning Vibrometry. Appl. Sci. 2017, 7, 862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  13. Ameen, W.; Al-Ahmari, A.; Hammad Mian, S. Evaluation of Handheld Scanners for Automotive Applications. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  14. Budzan, S.; Wyżgolik, R.; Ilewicz, W. Improved Human Detection with a Fusion of Laser Scanner and Vision/Infrared Information for Mobile Applications. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 1967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  15. Previtali, M.; Díaz-Vilariño, L.; Scaioni, M. Indoor Building Reconstruction from Occluded Point Clouds Using Graph-Cut and Ray-Tracing. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 1529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  16. Panholzer, H.; Prokop, A. HOVE-Wedge-Filtering of Geomorphologic Terrestrial Laser Scan Data. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  17. Ravi, R.; Shamseldin, T.; Elbahnasawy, M.; Lin, Y.J.; Habib, A. Bias Impact Analysis and Calibration of UAV-Based Mobile LiDAR System with Spinning Multi-Beam Laser Scanner. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  18. Qin, H.; Wang, C.; Xi, X.; Tian, J.; Zhou, G. Simulating the Effects of the Airborne Lidar Scanning Angle, Flying Altitude, and Pulse Density for Forest Foliage Profile Retrieval. Appl. Sci. 2017, 7, 712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  19. Chun, J.; Tahk, J.; Chun, Y.S.; Park, J.M.; Kim, M. Analysis on the Accuracy of Intraoral Scanners: The Effects of Mandibular Anterior Interdental Space. Appl. Sci. 2017, 7, 719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  20. Rodríguez-Cielos, R.; Galán-García, J.; Padilla-Domínguez, Y.; Rodríguez-Cielos, P.; Bello-Patricio, A.; López-Medina, J. LiDARgrammetry: A New Method for Generating Synthetic Stereoscopic Products from Digital Elevation Models. Appl. Sci. 2017, 7, 906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  21. Petras, V.; Newcomb, D.J.; Mitasova, H. Generalized 3D fragmentation index derived from lidar point clouds. Open Geospatial Data Softw. Stand. 2017, 2, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.