In the original publication [1], the funder CHD, Open Fund of Xi’an Key Laboratory of Urban Low-Carbon Construction of No. 300102284501 to Sisi Chao was not included. The Corrected Funding Statement appears below:
- Funding: The research described in this paper was financially supported by the Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi (No. 2023-JC-QN-0479), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 300102284501), the project of Shaanxi Outstanding Youth Science Foundation (2023-JC-JQ-47), the project of Shaanxi International Science and Technology Cooperation Program Project (2024GH-ZDXM-18), the project of Shaanxi University Youth Innovation Team Program (2023) and CHD, Open Fund of Xi’an Key Laboratory of Urban Low-Carbon Construction (300102284501).
In the published publication, there was an error regarding the affiliations for Sisi Chao. In addition to affiliation 1, the updated affiliations should include: Xi’an Key Laboratory of Urban Low-Carbon Construction, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710061, China.
The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.
Reference
- Chao, S.; Li, C.; Dong, J.; Lu, Z. Towards Selecting an Optimal Bonding Test Method for Rebar–Concrete: Comparison Between Pull-Out Test and Full-Beam Test. Buildings 2025, 15, 2375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.