Next Article in Journal
Two-Stage Distributionally Robust Optimization for Intelligent Buildings Integrating Virtual Energy Storage
Previous Article in Journal
Research on Safety Resilience of Prefabricated Building Systems Based on Improved ISM-BN
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fragility-Based Assessment of the Behaviour Factor for Eurocode 8-Designed Suspended Piping Restraint Systems
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Seismic Performance of Idealised RC Buildings Under Topographically Amplified Ground Motion: Site-Specific Evidence from the 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquake in Adana

Department of Civil Engineering, Osmaniye Korkut Ata University, Osmaniye 80000, Türkiye
Buildings 2026, 16(12), 2367; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16122367 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 22 May 2026 / Revised: 9 June 2026 / Accepted: 11 June 2026 / Published: 13 June 2026
(This article belongs to the Collection Structural Analysis for Earthquake-Resistant Design of Buildings)

Abstract

The Mw7.7 Pazarcık–Kahramanmaraş and Mw7.5 Elbistan–Kahramanmaraş earthquakes on 6 February 2023 caused the collapse of 11 buildings in Adana’s city centre—predominantly 15-storey RC structures in a narrow zone—despite peak ground accelerations of only 0.05 g; most collapses occurred during the Mw7.7 event. Two-dimensional seismic site response analyses at the site of interest with bedrock input from station TK0118 yielded topographic amplification factors of 2.37 (EW) and 2.09 (NS) for homogeneous conditions; with stratigraphic heterogeneity, NS increased to 2.66 and EW remained at 2.27, reaching above 3.0 at the slope crest. Spectral amplification factors reached 4.53 (NS, T = 0.90 s) and 3.21 (EW, T = 0.68 s), indicating amplification in the short-to-intermediate period range. These amplified records were applied to idealised 15-storey RC models—from code-compliant to deliberately deficient—with C16 and C8 concrete classes through nonlinear performance analyses. Under unamplified TK0118 records, no model reached collapse-level damage. Under amplified records, only the most deficient model exhibited widespread shear and strain failures in the lower storeys. A detected velocity pulse (Tp = 13.496 s) was excluded as a collapse mechanism, as its period far exceeds structural periods (1.2–1.9 s). The collapses are attributable to the compounding of topographic and stratigraphic amplification with pre-existing structural deficiencies.
Keywords: topographic seismic amplification; seismic site response analysis; collapse; performance analysis; far-field earthquake topographic seismic amplification; seismic site response analysis; collapse; performance analysis; far-field earthquake

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Baran, T. Seismic Performance of Idealised RC Buildings Under Topographically Amplified Ground Motion: Site-Specific Evidence from the 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquake in Adana. Buildings 2026, 16, 2367. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16122367

AMA Style

Baran T. Seismic Performance of Idealised RC Buildings Under Topographically Amplified Ground Motion: Site-Specific Evidence from the 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquake in Adana. Buildings. 2026; 16(12):2367. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16122367

Chicago/Turabian Style

Baran, Tarık. 2026. "Seismic Performance of Idealised RC Buildings Under Topographically Amplified Ground Motion: Site-Specific Evidence from the 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquake in Adana" Buildings 16, no. 12: 2367. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16122367

APA Style

Baran, T. (2026). Seismic Performance of Idealised RC Buildings Under Topographically Amplified Ground Motion: Site-Specific Evidence from the 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquake in Adana. Buildings, 16(12), 2367. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16122367

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop