In the original publication [1], there was a mistake in Figures 10–12. The corrected Figure 10, Figure 11 and Figure 12 appear below. The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.
Figure 10.
Cyclic AC impedance of polyurethane–acrylic coating under salt spray test conditions ((left): Nyquist plot; (right): Bode plot).
Figure 11.
Alternating-current impedance at different cycles under multi-factor cyclic test conditions for polyurethane–acrylic coatings ((left): Nyquist plot; (right): Bode plot).
Figure 12.
Changes in gloss loss, adhesion, and low-frequency impedance modulus of polyurethane–acrylic coatings in indoor and outdoor tests.
Reference
- Zhao, M.; Zhang, J.; Wang, R.; An, Y.; Yu, H.; Meng, Z.; Shu, Y.; Xiao, K. Analysis of Coating Failure in Hainan’s Coastal Atmospheric Environment and Correlation Between Indoor and Outdoor Testing. Metals 2026, 16, 543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.