Climate Change Impacts on Suitable Habitats of the Endangered Parnassius imperator, an Alpine Butterfly Endemic to China
Simple Summary
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Occurrence Data
2.2. Variable Selection and Screening
2.3. Species Distribution Modeling
- (1)
- With the occurrence records and environmental layers (BIOs + elevation or BIOs + elevation + NDVI + HFP) as input files, the performance of each of the twelve commonly used model algorithms implemented in the R package “sdm” version 1.1-8 [43] was evaluated. These models included BIOCLIM [44], classification and regression trees (CART) [45], Domain [46], flexible discriminant analysis (FDA) [47], generalized additive model (GAM) [48], generalized linear model (GLM) [49], Glmnet [50], maximum entropy (MaxEnt) [11], Maxlike [51], multivariate adaptive regression spline (MARS) [52], random forests (RF) [10], and support vector machine (SVM) [53].
- (2)
- The main parameters in the evaluation were used as follows. The “gRandom” method of the “sdmData” function was used to randomly generate 1000 pseudo-absences [54]. 75% of the distribution data was set as training data, and the remaining 25% was set as test data. The maximum iterations were set to 5000 [12,55,56]. For each model with a ten-fold cross-validation approach (i.e., 120 single models), the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) [57] and the true skill statistic (TSS) [58] were calculated. The model with an average AUC ≥ 0.90 and TSS ≥ 0.85 was selected to be used in the following ensemble models (Figure 2).
- (3)
- According to the AUC value ≥ 0.90 and TSS values ≥ 0.85, the top single models (Maxent and SVM for the BIOs + elevation; GAM, MARS, Maxent, and MDA for the BIOs + elevation + NDVI + HFP) were selected for the establishment of ensemble models developed by the R package “sdm” [43].
- (4)
- To construct an ensemble model, the “ensemble” function was used to combine the output results of the selected individual models with a weighted average approach. Besides, the settings of pseudo-absence, division of training and test data, and maximum iterations were the same as those of the selection of single models.
- (5)
- The “getVarImp” function was used to calculate the variable contribution values. Besides, the “roc” and “rcurve” functions were employed to generate the ROC curves for each model and response curves for each variable, respectively. For future projections, the “ensemble” function with a weighted average approach was used as well.
2.4. Model Evaluation
2.5. Analyses of Model Results
3. Results
3.1. Model Performances
3.2. Variable Importance
3.3. Response Curves of the Variables on Presence Probability of P. imperator Habitats
3.4. The Current Potential Distribution of P. imperator Habitats
3.5. The Future Potential Distribution of P. imperator Habitats
3.6. Change Dynamics of Distribution and Centroid Shift
4. Discussion
4.1. Suitable Habitats of P. imperator Under Different Climate Scenarios
4.2. The Crucial Factors Influencing the Habitat Distribution of P. imperator
4.3. Implications for P. imperator Conservation
4.4. Limitations and Future Prospects
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Butchart, S.H.; Walpole, M.; Collen, B.; van Strien, A.; Scharlemann, J.P.W.; Almond, R.E.A.; Baillie, J.E.M.; Bomhard, B.; Brown, C.; Bruno, J.; et al. Global biodiversity: Indicators of recent declines. Science 2010, 328, 1164–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pimm, S.L.; Jenkins, C.N.; Abell, R.; Brooks, T.M.; Gittleman, J.L.; Joppa, L.N.; Raven, P.H.; Roberts, C.M.; Sexton, J.O. The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection. Science 2014, 344, 1246752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rands, M.R.; Adams, W.M.; Bennun, L.; Butchart, S.H.M.; Clements, A.; Coomes, D.; Entwistle, A.; Hodge, I.; Kapos, V.; Scharlemann, J.P.W.; et al. Biodiversity conservation: Challenges beyond 2010. Science 2010, 329, 1298–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sbaraglia, C.; Samraoui, K.R.; Massolo, A.; Bartoňová, A.S.; Konvička, M.; Fric, Z.F. Back to the future: Climate change effects on habitat suitability of Parnassius apollo throughout the Quaternary glacial cycles. Insect Conserv. Diver. 2023, 16, 231–242. [Google Scholar]
- Guisan, A.; Tingley, R.; Baumgartner, J.B.; Naujokaitis-Lewis, I.; Sutcliffe, P.R.; Tulloch, A.I.T.; Regan, T.J.; Brotons, L.; McDonald-Madden, E.; Mantyka-Pringle, C.; et al. Predicting species distributions for conservation decisions. Ecol. Lett. 2013, 16, 1424–1435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Johnson, D.H. The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology 1980, 61, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neupane, N.; Larsen, E.A.; Ries, L. Ecological forecasts of insect range dynamics: A broad range of taxa include winners and losers under future climate. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 2024, 62, 101159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yang, M.; Yu, J.; Wang, Y.; Dewer, Y.; Huo, Y.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, H.; Shao, X.; Ma, F.; Shangguan, X.; et al. Potential global distributions of an important aphid pest, Rhopalosiphum padi: Insights from ensemble models with multiple variables. J. Econ. Entomol. 2025, 118, 576–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhu, G.P.; Liu, G.Q.; Bu, W.J.; Gao, Y.B. Ecological niche modelling and its applications in biodiversity conservation. Biodivers. Sci. 2013, 21, 90–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Breiman, L. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 2001, 45, 5–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Phillips, S.J.; Anderson, R.P.; Schapire, R.E. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographical distributions. Ecol. Model. 2006, 190, 231–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, W.B.; Teng, Y.; Zhang, M.Y.; Shen, Y.; Liu, J.W.; Qi, J.W.; Wang, X.C.; Wu, R.F.; Li, J.H.; Garber, P.A.; et al. Human activity and climate change accelerate the extinction risk to non-human primates in China. Glob. Change Biol. 2024, 30, e17114. [Google Scholar]
- Duan, M.; Ning, J.; Wang, G.; Xu, Z.; Li, S.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, L.; Zhao, L. Human activities and climate change accelerate the spread risk of Hyphantria cunea in China. Insects 2026, 17, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Duffy, G.A.; Coetzee, B.W.; Latombe, G.; Akerman, A.H.; McGeoch, M.A.; Chown, S.L. Barriers to globally invasive species are weakening across the Antarctic. Divers. Distrib. 2017, 23, 982–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gan, T.; He, Z.; Xu, D.; Chen, J.; Zhang, H.; Wei, X.; Zhuo, Z. Modeling the potential distribution of Hippophae rhamnoides in China under current and future climate scenarios using the biomod2 model. Front. Plant Sci. 2025, 16, 1533251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, T.; Liu, H.; Tong, J.; Yang, Y. Habitat suitability of neotenic net-winged beetles (Coleoptera: Lycidae) in China using combined ecological models, with implications for biological conservation. Divers. Distrib. 2022, 28, 2806–2823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Araújo, M.B.; New, M. Ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2007, 22, 42–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Grenouillet, G.; Buisson, L.; Casajus, N.; Lek, S. Ensemble modelling of species distribution: The effects of geographical and environmental ranges. Ecography 2011, 34, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thuiller, W.; Lafourcade, B.; Engler, R.; Araújo, M.B. BIOMOD–A platform for ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Ecography 2009, 32, 369–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koo, K.A.; Park, S.U. A dark future of endangered mountain species, Parnassius bremeri, under climate change. Ecol. Evol. 2025, 15, e71178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ghazanfar, M.; Malik, M.F.; Hussain, M.; Iqbal, R.; Younas, M. Butterflies and their contribution in ecosystem: A Review. J. Entomol. Zool. Stud. 2016, 4, 115–118. [Google Scholar]
- Thomas, J.A. Monitoring change in the abundance and distribution of insects using butterflies and other indicator groups. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 2005, 360, 339–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tian, X.; Mo, S.; Liang, D.; Wang, H.; Zhang, P. Amplicon capture phylogenomics provides new insights into the phylogeny and evolution of alpine Parnassius butterflies (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). Syst. Entomol. 2023, 48, 571–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martín-Vélez, V.; Abellán, P. Effects of climate change on the distribution of threatened invertebrates in a Mediterranean hotspot. Insect Conserv. Divers. 2022, 15, 370–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chou, I. Monographia Rhopalocerorum Sinensium, revised ed.; Henan Scientific and Technological Publishing House: Zhengzhou, China, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Fang, J.H.; Luo, Y.Q.; Niu, B.; Tu, A.; Zhao, L. Biological characteristics and habitat requirements of Parnassius imperator (Lepidoptera: Parnassiidae). Acta Ecol. Sin. 2012, 32, 361–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Da, X.W.; Zhang, R.; Chen, G.L.; Ren, Q.M.; Lin, Y.F.; Du, B. Why do males of Parnassius imperator fight for bare rocks but not the nectar flower during mate selection? Ethology 2016, 122, 552–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, X.T.; Yang, F.L.; Da, W.; Li, Y.C.; Xi, H.M.; Cotton, A.M.; Zhang, H.H.; Duan, K.; Xu, Z.B.; Gong, Z.X.; et al. Species richness of Papilionidae butterflies (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea) in the Hengduan Mountains and its future shifts under climate change. Insects 2023, 14, 259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chamberlain, S.; Ram, K.; Barve, V.; Mcglinn, D. rgbif: Interface to the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, R Package Version; CRAN: Vienna, Austria, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Zizka, A.; Silvestro, D.; Andermann, T.; Azevedo, J.; Ritter, C.D.; Edler, D.; Farooq, H.; Herdean, A.; Ariza, M.; Scharn, R.; et al. Coordinatecleaner: Standardized cleaning of occurrence records from biological collection databases. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2019, 10, 744–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aiello-Lammens, M.E.; Boria, R.A.; Radosavljevic, A.; Vilela, B.; Anderson, R.P. spThin: An R package for spatial thinning of species occurrence records for use in ecological niche models. Ecography 2015, 38, 541–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aidoo, O.F.; Souza, P.G.C.; Silva, R.S.; Júnior, P.A.S.; Picanço, M.C.; Heve, W.K.; Duker, R.Q.; Ablormeti, F.K.; Sétamou, M.; Borgemeister, C. Modeling climate change impacts on potential global distribution of Tamarixia radiata Waterston (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 864, 160962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lantschner, M.V.; de la Vega, G.; Corley, J.C. Predicting the distribution of harmful species and their natural enemies in agricultural, livestock and forestry systems: An overview. Int. J. Pest Manag. 2019, 65, 190–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boucher, O.; Servonnat, J.; Albright, A.L.; Aumont, O.; Balkanski, Y.; Bastrikov, V.; Bekki, S.; Bonnet, R.; Bony, S.; Bopp, L.; et al. Presentation and evaluation of the IPSL-CM6A-LR climate model. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 2020, 12, e2019MS001929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eyring, V.; Bony, S.; Meehl, G.A.; Senior, C.A.; Stevens, B.; Stouffer, R.J.; Taylor, K.E. Overview of the coupled model intercomparison project phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization. Geosci. Model Dev. 2016, 9, 1937–1958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- O’Neill, B.C.; Kriegler, E.; Riahi, K.; Ebi, K.L.; Hallegatte, S.; Carter, T.R.; Mathur, R.; van Vuuren, D.P. A new scenario framework for climate change research: The concept of shared socioeconomic pathways (SSPs). Clim. Change 2014, 122, 387–400. [Google Scholar]
- Xin, X.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, F.; Wu, T.; Shi, X.; Li, J.; Chu, M.; Liu, Q.; Yan, J.; Ma, Q.; et al. BCC BCC-CSM2MR Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 CMIP. World Data Center for Climate (WDCC) at DKRZ. 2023. Available online: https://www.wdc-climate.de/ui/entry?acronym=C6_4101192 (accessed on 10 April 2024).
- Yukimoto, S.; Kawai, H.; Koshiro, T.; Oshima, N.; Yoshida, K.; Urakawa, S.; Tsujino, H.; Deushi, M.; Tanaka, T.; Hosaka, M.; et al. The Meteorological Research Institute Earth System Model version 2.0, MRI-ESM2. 0: Description and basic evaluation of the physical component. J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn. Ser. II 2019, 97, 931–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dormann, C.F.; Elith, J.; Bacher, S.; Buchmann, C.; Carl, G.; Carré, G.; Jaime, R.; Marquéz, G.; Gruber, B.; Lafourcade, B.; et al. Correlation and process in species distribution models: Bridging a dichotomy. J. Biogeogr. 2012, 39, 2119–2131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sillero, N.; Arenas-Castro, S.; Enriquez-Urzelai, U.; Vale, C.G.; Sousa-Guedes, D.; Martínez-Freiría, F.; Real, R.; Barbosa, A.M. Want to model a species niche? A step-by-step guideline on correlative ecological niche modelling. Ecol. Model. 2021, 456, 109671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, X.; Bai, W.; Wang, Y.; Hao, S.; Zhao, L.; Li, X.; Guo, Z.; Li, X. Predicting habitat suitability for an endangered medicinal plant, Saussurea medusa: Insights from ensemble species distribution models. Front. Plant Sci. 2025, 16, 1590206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ran, W.; Chen, J.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, N.; Luo, G.; Zhao, Z.; Song, Y. Global climate change-driven impacts on the Asian distribution of Limassolla leafhoppers, with implications for biological and environmental conservation. Ecol. Evol. 2024, 14, e70003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Naimi, B.; Araujo, M.B. sdm: A reproducible and extensible R platform for species distribution modelling. Ecography 2016, 39, 368–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Busby, J.R. BIOCLIM—A bioclimate analysis and prediction system. Plant Prot. Q. 1991, 6, 8–9. [Google Scholar]
- Loh, W.Y. Classification and regression trees. WIREs Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 2011, 1, 14–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reinhartz-Berger, I. Towards automatization of domain modelling. Data Knowl. Eng. 2010, 69, 491–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hastie, T.; Tibshirani, R.; Buja, A. Flexible discriminant analysis by optimal scoring. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1994, 89, 1255–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hastie, T.; Tibshirani, R. Generalized additive models: Some applications. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1987, 82, 371–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nelder, J.A.; Wedderburn, R.W. Generalized linear models. J. R. Stat. Soc. A 1972, 135, 370–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Engebretsen, S.; Bohlin, J. Statistical predictions with glmnet. Clin. Epigenet. 2019, 11, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Royle, J.A.; Chandler, R.B.; Yackulic, C.; Nichols, J.D. Likelihood analysis of species occurrence probability from presence-only data for modelling species distributions. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2012, 3, 545–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Friedman, J.H. Multivariate adaptive regression splines. Ann. Stat. 1991, 19, 1–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hearst, M.A.; Osuna, S.T.; Platt, J.; Scholkopf, B. Support vector machines. IEEE Intell. Syst. Appl. 1998, 13, 18–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barbet-Massin, M.; Jiguet, F.; Albert, C.H.; Thuiller, W. Selecting pseudo-absences for species distribution models: How, where and how many? Methods Ecol. Evol. 2012, 3, 327–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, D.; Sun, L.; Pritchard, H.W.; Yang, J.; Sun, H.; Li, Z. Species distribution modelling and seed germination of four threatened snow lotus (Saussurea), and their implication for conservation. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2019, 17, e00565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Ding, W.; Xu, K.; Li, L.; Wang, Y.; Li, J.; Yang, M.; Liu, X.; et al. Modelling the current and future potential distribution of the bean bug Riptortus pedestris with increasingly serious damage to soybean. Pest Manag. Sci. 2022, 78, 4340–4352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lobo, J.M.; Jiménez-Valverde, A.; Real, R. AUC: A misleading measure of the performance of predictive distribution models. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2008, 17, 145–151. [Google Scholar]
- Allouche, O.; Tsoar, A.; Kadmon, R. Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: Prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS). J. Appl. Ecol. 2006, 43, 1223–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hand, D.J.; Anagnostopoulos, C. When is the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve an appropriate measure of classifier performance? Pattern Recognit. Lett. 2013, 34, 492–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peterson, A.T.; Papes, M.; Soberon, J. Rethinking receiver operating characteristic analysis applications in ecological niche modeling. Ecol. Model. 2008, 213, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, G.P.; Fan, J.Y.; Wang, M.L.; Chen, M.; Qiao, H. The importance of the shape of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve in ecological niche model evaluation—Case study of Hlyphantria cunea. J. Biosaf. 2017, 26, 184–190. [Google Scholar]
- Pearce, J.; Ferrier, S. An evaluation of alternative algorithms for fitting species distribution models using logistic regression. Ecol. Model. 2000, 128, 127–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, K.; Yao, L.; Meng, J.; Tao, J. Maxent modelling for predicting the potential geographical distribution of two peony species under climate change. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 634, 1326–1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Katoh, T.; Chichvarkhin, A.; Yagi, T.; Omoto, K. Phylogeny and evolution of butterflies of the genus Parnassius: Inferences from mitochondrial 16S and ND1 sequences. Zool. Sci. 2005, 22, 343–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
- Zhao, Y.; He, B.; Tao, R.; Su, C.; Ma, J.; Hao, J.; Yang, Q. Phylogeny and biogeographic history of Parnassius butterflies (Papilionidae: Parnassiinae) reveal their origin and deep diversification in West China. Insects 2022, 13, 406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rossi, J.P.; Rasplus, J.Y. Climate change and the potential distribution of the glassy-winged sharpshooter Homalodisca vitripennis, an insect vector of Xylella fastidiosa. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 860, 160375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Macfadyen, S.; McDonald, G.; Hill, M.P. From species distributions to climate change adaptation: Knowledge gaps in managing invertebrate pests in broad-acre grain crops. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2018, 253, 208–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heikkinen, R.K.; Luoto, M.; Leikola, N.; Pöyry, J.; Settele, J.; Kudrna, O.; Marmion, M.; Fronzek, S.; Thuiller, W. Assessing the vulnerability of European butterflies to climate change using multiple criteria. Biodivers. Conserv. 2010, 19, 695–723. [Google Scholar]
- Santana, P.A., Jr.; Kumar, L.; Da Silva, R.S.; Pereira, J.L.; Picanço, M.C. Assessing the impact of climate change on the worldwide distribution of Dalbulus maidis DeLong using MaxEnt. Pest Manag. Sci. 2019, 75, 2706–2715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- He, B. Phylogenomics and Population Genetics of Representative Parnassius species (Papilionidae: Parnassinae). Doctor’s Dissertation, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu, China, 2025. [Google Scholar]
- Trisos, C.H.; Merow, C.; Pigot, A.L. The projected timing of abrupt ecological disruption from climate change. Nature 2020, 580, 496–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Barbet-Massin, M.; Jetz, W. A 40-year, continent-wide, multispecies assessment of relevant climate predictors for species distribution modelling. Divers. Distrib. 2014, 20, 1285–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bell, D.M.; Bradford, J.B.; Lauenroth, W.K. Early indicators of change: Divergent climate envelopes between tree life stages imply range shifts in the western United States. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2014, 23, 168–180. [Google Scholar]
- Hill, G.M.; Kawahara, A.Y.; Daniels, J.C.; Bateman, C.C.; Scheffers, B.R. Climate change effects on animal ecology: Butterflies and moths as a case study. Biol. Rev. 2021, 96, 2113–2126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Azrag, A.G.A.; Pirk, C.W.W.; Yusuf, A.A.; Pinard, F.; Niassy, S.; Mosomtai, G.; Babin, R. Prediction of insect pest distribution as influenced by elevation: Combining field observations and temperature-dependent development models for the coffee stink bug, Antestiopsis thunbergii (Gmelin). PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0199569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chardon, N.I.; Cornwell, W.K.; Flint, L.E.; Flint, A.L.; Ackerly, D.D. Topographic, latitudinal and climatic distribution of Pinus coulteri: Geographic range limits are not at the edge of the climate envelope. Ecography 2015, 38, 590–601. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, R.; Wang, S.; Chen, S. Predicting the potential habitat suitability of Saussurea species in China under future climate scenarios using the optimized maximum entropy maxent model. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 474, 143552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hof, A.R.; Jansson, R.; Nilsson, C. The usefulness of elevation as a predictor variable in species distribution modelling. Ecol. Model. 2012, 246, 86–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luck, G.W. A review of the relationships between human population density and biodiversity. Biol. Rev. 2007, 82, 607–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, D.; Gan, H.; Li, X.; Zhou, H.; Zhang, H.; Liu, Y.; Dong, R.; Hua, L.; Hu, G. Changes in the range of four advantageous grasshopper habitats in the Hexi Corridor under future climate conditions. Insects 2024, 15, 243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Paradis, E. Nonlinear relationship between biodiversity and human population density: Evidence from Southeast Asia. Biodivers. Conserv. 2018, 27, 2699–2712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haddad, N.M.; Hudgens, B.; Damiani, C.; Gross, K.; Kuefler, D.; Pollock, K. Determining optimal population monitoring for rare butterflies. Conserv. Biol. 2008, 22, 929–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yang, X.; Gu, T.; Wang, S. Effectiveness of nature reserves in China: Human footprint and ecosystem services perspective. Appl. Geogr. 2024, 171, 103359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Breiner, F.T.; Guisan, A.; Bergamini, A.; Nobis, M.P. Overcoming limitations of modelling rare species by using ensembles of small models. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2015, 6, 1210–1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stefanidis, A.; Kougioumoutzis, K.; Zografou, K.; Fotiadis, G.; Tzortzakaki, O.; Willemse, L.; Kati, V. Mitigating the extinction risk of globally threatened and endemic mountainous Orthoptera species: Parnassiana parnassica and Oropodisma parnassica. Insect Conserv. Divers. 2025, 18, 54–68. [Google Scholar]









Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Ma, K.; Wang, Y.; Ding, W.; Ma, Y.; Tang, X.; Han, J.; Li, J.; Li, X.; Shang, S.; Yang, M. Climate Change Impacts on Suitable Habitats of the Endangered Parnassius imperator, an Alpine Butterfly Endemic to China. Insects 2026, 17, 635. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects17060635
Ma K, Wang Y, Ding W, Ma Y, Tang X, Han J, Li J, Li X, Shang S, Yang M. Climate Change Impacts on Suitable Habitats of the Endangered Parnassius imperator, an Alpine Butterfly Endemic to China. Insects. 2026; 17(6):635. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects17060635
Chicago/Turabian StyleMa, Keshi, Yongli Wang, Weili Ding, Yiran Ma, Xiaojiao Tang, Jing Han, Junting Li, Xinru Li, Suqin Shang, and Mingsheng Yang. 2026. "Climate Change Impacts on Suitable Habitats of the Endangered Parnassius imperator, an Alpine Butterfly Endemic to China" Insects 17, no. 6: 635. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects17060635
APA StyleMa, K., Wang, Y., Ding, W., Ma, Y., Tang, X., Han, J., Li, J., Li, X., Shang, S., & Yang, M. (2026). Climate Change Impacts on Suitable Habitats of the Endangered Parnassius imperator, an Alpine Butterfly Endemic to China. Insects, 17(6), 635. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects17060635

