Skip to Content
  • Editor’s Choice
  • Review
  • Open Access

1 April 2026

48 Pages

Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Medicine: A Giant Step in Personalized Medicine?

,
,
and
School of Medicine, City University of New York, Manhattan, NY 10031, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly reshaping cardiovascular (CV) medicine, driving a paradigm shift toward truly personalized and data-driven care. This comprehensive review examines the conceptual foundations, clinical applications, and future implications of AI across the CV continuum, spanning prevention, diagnosis, risk stratification, and therapy. Core AI methodologies (including machine learning, deep learning, natural language processing, and computer vision) are discussed in the context of cardiology’s uniquely data-rich environment, encompassing imaging, electrocardiography, electronic health records, wearable devices, and multi-omics data. This systematic review highlights major clinical domains where AI has demonstrated a substantial impact, including CV imaging, ECG interpretation, hypertension and heart failure management, coronary artery disease, acute coronary syndromes, interventional cardiology, and cardiac surgery. AI-driven predictive analytics enable early detection of subclinical disease, improved prognostication, and individualized prevention strategies, while wearable technologies and remote monitoring platforms facilitate continuous, real-world patient surveillance. Emerging applications in pharmacotherapy, drug repurposing, and genomics further reinforce AI’s role in advancing precision cardiology. Equally emphasized are the ethical, legal, and social challenges accompanying AI adoption, such as algorithmic bias, data privacy, cybersecurity, interpretability, and regulatory oversight. Our review underscores the necessity of rigorous clinical validation, transparent model design, and seamless integration into clinical workflows to ensure safety, equity, and physician trust. Ultimately, AI is best positioned as an augmentative tool that complements (but does not replace!) clinical expertise. By fostering hybrid intelligence that integrates human judgment with computational power, AI has the potential to redefine CV care delivery, improve outcomes, and support a more proactive, patient-centered healthcare model.

1. Introduction

The rise of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in cardiovascular (CV) medicine marks a significant evolution in healthcare, aligning closely with historical advancements in AI across the broader medical landscape. To understand how AI is transforming CV medicine, it is essential to explore the historical context of AI in healthcare (Table 1), the unique attributes that make cardiology conducive to AI adoption, and the current momentum driving this transformation.
Table 1. Timeline of Major Discoveries in AI in Medicine.
AI’s journey in healthcare began with the development of expert systems in the 1970s and 1980s, which were designed to assist with diagnosis through a rule-based approach. These early systems, although limited by the technology of their time, laid the foundation for subsequent advancements in machine learning (ML) and natural language processing (NLP) applications in the healthcare sector [51,52]. As computational capabilities improved, AI began to leverage vast datasets, including electronic health records and imaging data. Milestones included the emergence of diagnostic algorithms that utilized deep learning (DL) techniques to enhance image interpretation and patient management strategies [53,54]. The evolution of AI in healthcare has coincided with a growing acknowledgment of the need for evidence-based medicine, where AI tools are increasingly integrated into workflows to facilitate more accurate clinical decision-making and enhance patient outcomes [55].
Cardiology, with its complex data types (including imaging, electrophysiology, and genomic information) presents a unique landscape well-suited for AI adoption. The volume and variability of CV data require efficient analytical methods capable of extracting meaningful patterns from large, heterogeneous datasets. Modern CV research and clinical practice generate vast amounts of multimodal information, including imaging data, genomic and transcriptomic profiles, biomarker measurements, wearable device outputs, and longitudinal clinical records. These data sources differ in structure, scale, and temporal resolution, creating substantial analytical complexity. Advanced computational approaches, including machine learning and integrative data modeling, enable the identification of subtle associations, predictive signatures, and mechanistic pathways that may not be apparent using conventional statistical techniques. By facilitating the integration and interpretation of complex CV datasets, these analytical frameworks can support earlier diagnosis, improved risk stratification, and the development of more targeted therapeutic strategies [56,57]. In cardiology, AI applications range from risk stratification models predicting patient outcomes to automated interpretation of echocardiograms and cardiac MRIs, thus significantly improving diagnostic accuracy and facilitating personalized treatment [58]. This integration supports cardiologists in improving clinical efficiency and enhancing the quality of care delivered to patients [59]. By automating routine tasks, AI frees up valuable time for clinicians, enabling them to focus on direct patient interactions and complex decision-making.
The current drive behind AI in CV medicine is mainly characterized by transformative trends that enhance both clinical practice and research. The proliferation of AI-driven diagnostic tools has led to a clearer understanding of cardiac pathologies by aiding in early detection and intervention strategies [60,61]. Continuous monitoring technologies, often supported by wearable devices, utilize AI to collect real-time data on patients, allowing for proactive management of conditions such as hypertension and heart failure (HF) [57]. AI’s role in clinical trials has been pivotal in accelerating drug discovery and therapeutic innovation, indicating a trajectory toward a more iterative and data-driven approach to treatment advancements [62]. This convergence of digital technologies underscores a broader shift toward a patient-centric model of care that aligns with contemporary health priorities and fosters greater engagement between patients and healthcare providers [63].
The transformative potential of AI in cardiology extends beyond diagnostic and treatment enhancements; it also encompasses operational improvements within healthcare systems. AI algorithms can improve healthcare delivery systems by predicting patient admission patterns and optimizing resource management to reduce waste and inefficiencies [64,65]. These innovations are crucial given the increasing demands on healthcare systems worldwide due to the aging population and rising prevalence of CV diseases [56,66]. Stakeholders in healthcare should navigate this new terrain with careful attention to ethical considerations, ensuring that AI technologies are deployed responsibly, transparently, and equitably in all areas of practice [67,68].
In the context of equity in healthcare, AI must also address fundamental issues such as algorithmic bias, data privacy, and the need for inclusive datasets that reflect diverse populations [69,70]. These challenges highlight the dual-edged nature of AI’s potential and necessitate policies that foster a holistic understanding of how reliable, fair, and inclusive AI should be within the landscape of CV care. So, the rise of AI in CV medicine illustrates a profound shift underpinned by historical advancements in AI technology, the inherent qualities of cardiology as a specialty for AI applications, and the transformative momentum currently reshaping the field. As healthcare providers and organizations continue to harness AI’s capabilities, it is crucial to remain vigilant in addressing ethical concerns and ensuring that these technological innovations prioritize patient welfare and equitable access to care. The prospective horizons of AI in CV medicine promise not only to enhance diagnostic and therapeutic capabilities but also to revolutionize how patient care is conceptualized, delivered, and experienced across the healthcare continuum.
Several ethical concerns arise with the implementation of AI in CV medicine and healthcare systems. One major issue is algorithmic bias, which can occur when AI models are trained on datasets that do not adequately represent diverse patient populations, potentially leading to unequal diagnostic accuracy or treatment recommendations across demographic groups. Data privacy and security also represent critical challenges, as AI systems rely on large volumes of sensitive clinical information, including imaging, electronic health records, and molecular data, which must be protected from misuse or unauthorized access. Transparency and explainability are additional concerns, since many AI models operate as complex “black boxes,” making it difficult for clinicians to understand the reasoning behind specific predictions or recommendations. Questions of accountability and liability may arise when AI-assisted decisions contribute to clinical errors, creating uncertainty regarding responsibility among clinicians, institutions, and developers. Furthermore, careful attention must be paid to informed consent for data use and to ensuring equitable access to AI technologies so that these innovations do not exacerbate existing disparities in healthcare delivery.

2. Foundations of AI

The foundations of AI, particularly in the realm of ML and DL, are pivotal in enhancing medical practices, especially in cardiology (Table 2).
Table 2. Types and Dimensions of AI in Medicine.
Rule-based systems are knowledge-based AI tools that apply predefined “if–then” logical rules derived from expert consensus or clinical guidelines to assist with diagnosis and management. They have been used to detect myocardial infarction from ECG patterns, support anticoagulation decisions in atrial fibrillation, and prompt evidence-based therapies such as β-blocker initiation after myocardial infarction. These systems are transparent and easily interpretable, offering reliable adherence to established protocols, but they lack flexibility and adaptability when faced with complex or atypical clinical presentations, and require continuous manual updating as CV knowledge evolves.
Supervised learning is a type of ML where the algorithm is trained on labeled datasets, containing input-output pairs, which allows the model to learn a mapping from inputs to the correct outputs [86]. This approach is particularly effective in diagnostic applications where labeled data, such as medical images with corresponding disease states, can teach the models the key characteristics of various conditions. For instance, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), a classic example of supervised learning, have been employed in analyzing cardiac MRI scans to identify abnormalities that denote potential CV diseases [87,88,89]. Unsupervised learning, in contrast, deals with unlabeled data and aims to identify hidden patterns without explicit instructions on what to find [86]. This technique can be particularly valuable in cardiology for clustering patients based on similarities in physiological data, aiding in risk stratification and personalized treatment [86].
Reinforcement learning (RL) presents a third paradigm where an algorithm learns to make decisions by performing actions within an environment to maximize cumulative rewards [90]. In the context of cardiology, RL can optimize treatment pathways by adjusting interventions based on patient responses, thus personalizing care plans for conditions such as HF or diabetes-related CV complications [88]. The application of RL in mobile health technology showcases its potential in promoting adherence to treatment protocols by using feedback mechanisms that guide patient interactions based on their adherence patterns [88].
NLP enables computers to interpret and extract clinically meaningful information from unstructured text such as electronic health records, imaging reports, and clinical notes. By applying linguistic and ML techniques, NLP can identify CV diagnoses, risk factors, medication use, and procedural outcomes that are often not captured in structured fields. It has been used to automatically detect HF phenotypes, extract echocardiographic parameters, and summarize cardiology consults. NLP enhances data retrieval, supports clinical research, and facilitates automated documentation, but its performance can be limited by variability in clinical language, data quality, and the need for domain-specific adaptation to maintain accuracy and reduce misinterpretation.
Computer vision (CV) involves the use of DL and image analysis algorithms to interpret visual data such as echocardiograms, cardiac CT, MRI, and angiographic images. By recognizing spatial patterns and subtle features beyond human perception, CV systems can automate tasks such as left ventricular function quantification, plaque characterization, and detection of structural abnormalities. They have demonstrated high accuracy in identifying coronary artery disease (CAD), classifying cardiomyopathies, and assessing valvular lesions. CV improves efficiency, consistency, and diagnostic precision, yet its performance can be affected by image quality, variations in acquisition protocols, and limited generalizability across populations or devices, necessitating careful validation and clinician oversight.
The architectures of DL play a significant role in medical AI applications. CNNs have proven vital in processing grid-like topology data, such as images, where they excel in detecting spatial hierarchies of features, thus leading to advancements in image recognition tasks like detecting arrhythmias from ECG signals [87]. Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) are designed to handle sequential data, making them ideal for time-series analysis, which is essential in cardiology when analyzing patients’ historical health records to detect temporal patterns in cardiac function [91]. More recently, transformers, which leverage attention mechanisms to model relationships between different data points, have been gaining traction. Their capabilities in natural language processing are translating to significant advances in the automated summarization of medical chart notes, enabling more efficient data extraction and insight generation in cardiology practices [92]. However, a significant challenge arises concerning interpretability. The “black box” nature of many DL models, where the decision-making process is not transparent to users, raises concerns, particularly in clinical settings where understanding the rationale behind predictions is essential for patient safety and trust. Explainable AI (XAI) seeks to address this challenge by providing frameworks that make the outputs of AI systems interpretable. For instance, methods such as SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) allow clinicians to understand how specific input features contribute to the model’s predictions, indicating which anatomical features in a cardiac MRI are driving a decision towards diagnosing heart disease [93].
In the cardiology landscape, the balance between leveraging powerful DL models and ensuring their interpretability reflects a broader ethical commitment to patient-centered care. AI applications must not only focus on enhancing diagnostic accuracy but also facilitate informed clinical decision-making through transparent and understandable AI interventions. This dual focus is critical as it fosters trust among healthcare providers and patients, thus enabling the broader adoption of AI technologies in clinical cardiology.
With the integration of federated learning, a decentralized approach that utilizes local data to train models without transferring sensitive information to a centralized server, there is a growing opportunity to enhance model performance while maintaining patient confidentiality and compliance with healthcare regulations [12,47,48,94,95,96,97]. This approach is instrumental in addressing ethical dilemmas and privacy concerns associated with AI in healthcare, particularly when dealing with sensitive patient data.
The foundations of AI have profound implications for the field of cardiology. The transition from traditional diagnostic methods to AI-enabled solutions signifies a substantial leap forward, characterized by enhanced accuracy, efficiency, and personalization of patient care. However, the imperative to ensure model transparency highlights the need for a balanced approach to adopting these technologies, with the ultimate goal of harmonizing innovation and the ethical dimensions of clinical practice. Through continued advancements in AI technology accompanied by robust frameworks for interpretation and patient engagement, the future of cardiology stands to become increasingly data-driven while remaining compassionate and patient-centric.

3. Big Data in Cardiology: Unlocking Clinical Insights

Big Data has become a transformative force in cardiology, fostering the potential to unlock clinical insights that can significantly enhance the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of CV diseases. The sources of CV data are diverse, encompassing Electronic Health Records (EHRs), patient registries, medical imaging, and wearable devices. Each of these sources contributes unique information that, when synthesized through big data analytics, provides a more comprehensive understanding of CV health.
EHRs have emerged as a cornerstone of big data in healthcare, containing extensive patient information, including demographics, medical histories, laboratory results, and treatment outcomes [98]. These records facilitate longitudinal studies that can identify trends over time and assist in risk assessments for CV diseases. Registries, often specifically tailored to certain conditions such as HF or myocardial infarction, aggregate data from multiple institutions and provide invaluable insights into treatment patterns, patient responses, and long-term outcomes [99]. Medical imaging technologies further enrich CV datasets, producing vast amounts of visual data from echocardiograms, MRIs, and CT scans, enhancing diagnostic capabilities and treatment planning [100].
Wearable devices have gained rapid integration into cardiology, enabling continuous monitoring of patients’ vital signs, physical activity, and other health markers [101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125]. This real-time data collection allows for proactive management of CV health, enabling clinicians to identify deteriorations in health before they manifest as acute events. The integration of data sources creates a wealth of information that can be harnessed through sophisticated analytical techniques to derive actionable insights, enhancing the overall quality of care.
However, the journey from data accumulation to meaningful insights is fraught with challenges, particularly in data preprocessing, integration, and interoperability. Preprocessing is crucial, as it involves cleaning, normalizing, and transforming data to ensure it is suitable for analysis [126]. Given the vast volume and variety of data sources, achieving consistency in data formats and content is a daunting task. Integration involves consolidating disparate data streams into a unified system, which can be hindered by varying standards and regulatory requirements across different healthcare systems [127].
Interoperability remains a critical barrier; different healthcare organizations often use incompatible systems that inhibit the seamless exchange of information [128]. This fragmentation complicates the ability of healthcare providers to gain a holistic view of patient health across multiple data sources. Solutions like standardized data formats and application programming interfaces (APIs) are essential in fostering interoperability, enabling disparate systems to communicate effectively [129]. Legislative support for initiatives promoting health information exchange can also facilitate better data sharing practices, leading to improved patient outcomes.
Cloud computing has emerged as a vital enabler for big data analytics in cardiology, providing the necessary infrastructure for storing and processing vast amounts of data. The scalability and flexibility of cloud services allow healthcare organizations to manage their data needs without significant capital investment in physical infrastructure [130]. Cloud computing solutions support advanced analytics that can drive predictive modeling and ML efforts, allowing clinicians to proactively manage patient care based on data-driven insights [98]. Federated learning is a promising approach that addresses both data privacy and interoperability concerns. By allowing algorithms to learn from decentralized data sources without requiring the data to leave its original location, federated learning promotes collaboration across healthcare institutions while preserving patient confidentiality [131]. This approach can improve the robustness of predictive models, as the algorithms are trained on a more diverse set of data, leading to better generalizability across patient populations [132]. As federated learning continues to evolve, it will likely play a significant role in future cardiology applications, enabling data-driven innovations while respecting patient privacy.

4. AI in CV Imaging

AI is rapidly transforming CV imaging, enhancing accuracy, speed, and reproducibility in diagnosis and management (Table 3). In particular, AI applications in echocardiography, cardiac computed tomography (CT), cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and nuclear imaging are revolutionary, allowing for automated measurements, disease detection, and significant clinical insights.
Table 3. Applications of AI in CV Imaging.

4.1. Echocardiography: Automated Measurements and Disease Detection

Echocardiography is a critical modality in cardiac imaging, providing real-time assessment of cardiac structure and function without the need for ionizing radiation. Recent developments in AI have catalyzed the automation of measurements in echocardiography, facilitating rapid evaluations of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and other cardiac parameters [170,171]. The introduction of automated three-dimensional echocardiography has improved consistency and reproducibility of left ventricular volume assessments compared to traditional two-dimensional techniques [172]. Automated algorithms enable high-throughput analysis, providing accurate measurements of important indices such as mitral valve area or left atrial size, which are crucial in managing various cardiac conditions [173,174].
AI has also shown great potential in disease detection. It has been implemented for assessing conditions like pulmonary hypertension by evaluating the tricuspid regurgitation jet velocity with high accuracy [175]. Systems are now capable of detecting subtle changes in cardiac morphology that might indicate pathologies, facilitating earlier diagnosis and treatment initiation. AI-assisted echocardiographic systems can enhance patient stratification, guiding clinical decision-making by flagging patients at risk for conditions such as HF or valvular heart diseases [176].
An example of advances in this field is given by studies evaluating the efficacy of automated echocardiographic assessments in pediatric patients, showcasing the methodology’s advantages in complex scenarios like those involving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation [177]. Overall, automation not only improves efficiency but also empowers non-specialists to perform echocardiographic assessments effectively, extending the use of echocardiography in diverse healthcare settings [178].

4.2. Cardiac CT: Plaque Characterization and Coronary Anatomy

Moving to cardiac CT, AI is significantly enhancing the analysis and interpretation of coronary anatomy and plaque characterization. CT imaging, particularly coronary computed tomography angiography (CTCA), is instrumental in non-invasively visualizing coronary arteries, providing insights into CAD. ML algorithms have been developed to differentiate between various types of plaques (calcified, non-calcified, and mixed plaques) allowing for precise risk stratification and treatment planning [179,180]. Automation in image interpretation helps reduce inter-reader variability and enhances diagnostic consistency [181].
DL models are useful in improving the accuracy of detecting coronary artery stenoses, which is critical for timely interventions [182]. AI algorithms can analyze complex imaging data swiftly, identifying structures and conditions that might be missed by human readers. This capability speeds up the diagnostic process and contributes to enhanced clinical confidence in imaging findings, ultimately improving patient care and outcomes [183,184].

4.3. Cardiac MRI: Tissue Characterization and Functional Analysis

Cardiac MRI is revered for its superior tissue characterization and functional analysis capabilities. It provides unparalleled insights into myocardial perfusion, edema, and fibrosis, critical in the assessment of various cardiomyopathies and ischemic heart disease. The integration of AI in this domain aids in automating the segmentation of the left ventricle, facilitating precise function quantification without the variability associated with manual image analysis [185,186]. Recent advancements have also included coupling AI with traditional imaging techniques, enabling improved myocardial strain assessment, a key indicator of cardiac function [187,188].
AI also assists in the interpretation of late gadolinium enhancement patterns, crucial for diagnosing myocardial infarction and differentiating between ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy [189,190]. AI-driven analysis allows clinicians to classify images more efficiently, thus yielding faster results and reducing the time patients wait for critical diagnoses. However, while AI automates traditionally labor-intensive tasks, it is paramount that healthcare professionals remain engaged in the interpretive process to integrate clinical correlation and judgment [191,192].

4.4. Nuclear Imaging: Perfusion Quantification and Hybrid Imaging

Nuclear imaging modalities, such as positron emission tomography (PET) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), offer essential insights into myocardial perfusion and viability. AI applications in this field focus on optimizing the quantification of myocardial perfusion defects, improving sensitivity and specificity in detecting CAD [193,194]. AI algorithms can analyze SPECT images to quantify regional myocardial blood flow changes effectively, yielding volumetric assessments that guide clinical decisions regarding revascularization or medical therapy [180,190].
Hybrid imaging approaches, combining CT or MRI with nuclear modalities, benefit significantly from AI. Integration of dual-modality imaging, particularly CT with SPECT or PET, creates more comprehensive datasets, leading to better diagnostic accuracy [195,196]. AI enhances the interpretation of these complex datasets by providing advanced visualization tools that allow for more nuanced analysis of underlying cardiac pathology [179,197]. As the landscape of cardiac diagnostics evolves, the fusion of imaging modalities with AI will likely result in more effective patient-centered solutions and treatment pathways.
Hence, the integration of AI into CV imaging is transforming the diagnostic landscape across various imaging modalities including echocardiography, cardiac CT, cardiac MRI, and nuclear imaging. Each modality embraces AI’s capabilities for automating measurements, enhancing disease detection, and improving tissue characterization and functional analysis. As technologies continue to evolve, it is imperative to balance automation with human expertise to ensure comprehensive patient care. Future advancements will likely further establish AI as an indispensable asset in optimizing CV imaging practices, improving clinical outcomes and patient safety.

5. Electrocardiogram (ECG) Analysis with AI

AI is making significant strides in the field of cardiology, particularly through enhanced ECG analysis. This progression is evident in the applications of AI for arrhythmia detection, uncovering hidden phenotypes related to left ventricular dysfunction, and ischemia prediction, as well as the implementation of continuous monitoring via wearable ECG devices.

5.1. Arrhythmia Detection: Atrial Fibrillation and Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias

One of the primary successes of AI in ECG analysis is its capability to detect arrhythmias, particularly atrial fibrillation (AF) and ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Traditional ECG interpretation often faces challenges due to variability in patient presentations, and AI algorithms have shown promise in improving the sensitivity and specificity of arrhythmia detection [198,199]. DL frameworks, such as CNNs, can analyze ECG signals to accurately identify AF, even when the arrhythmia is intermittent. For instance, models based on CNNs have been reported to achieve an accuracy of 95.3% in detecting AF when applied to Holter monitoring data, illustrating their potential for reliable clinical decision support [200,201].
AI advancements also extend to identifying other life-threatening arrhythmias beyond AF, such as ventricular tachycardia. AI’s ability to recognize complex patterns in ECG readings allows for real-time monitoring and immediate alerting of healthcare providers when abnormal rhythms are detected, thus enhancing patient safety and response measures during emergencies [202]. Integrating AI-enhanced algorithms can significantly reduce false-positive rates for arrhythmia detection when used in conjunction with traditional monitoring systems [199].
AI contributes significantly to the continuity of care by providing ongoing assessments of cardiac health. This is particularly relevant in post-procedural monitoring scenarios where patients may be at heightened risk for arrhythmias [202,203]. The potential for automated detection and alerting can relieve the workload on medical staff, enabling them to focus on higher-priority patient care activities.

5.2. Hidden Phenotypes: Left Ventricular Dysfunction and Ischemia Prediction

The role of AI in ECG analysis also encompasses detecting hidden phenotypes that signify underlying cardiac conditions. Left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and ischemic conditions can manifest through subtle changes in the ECG that may be overlooked during standard evaluations. AI algorithms can analyze these nuanced variations to predict ischemia and assess LV dynamics [198,204]. AI models can extract features from ECG data that correlate with decreased ejection fraction (EF), enhancing the ability to risk-stratify patients early [205].
AI techniques can utilize longitudinal ECG data to monitor patients over time, allowing for the identification of trends related to LV dysfunction that may not be apparent in isolated measurements. This capacity is critical for guiding early interventions and adjusting treatment strategies in individuals with chronic heart conditions [206]. Such predictive capabilities signify a shift from merely reactive cardiology to a more proactive and preventive approach based on data-driven insights.

5.3. Continuous Monitoring with Patch-Based or Wearable ECG Devices

The integration of AI with continuous monitoring technologies is revolutionizing CV health management. Wearable ECG devices, such as patch-based systems, enable real-time monitoring of patients’ heart rhythms, facilitating the early detection of arrhythmias and other CV events in non-clinical settings [203,207]. These devices, powered by AI algorithms, yield diagnostic accuracy that matches or exceeds traditional methodologies, providing greater accessibility to vital health insights for patients in their everyday environments [208,209].
Research involving smartphone-integrated ECG devices illustrates how AI can facilitate continuous, remote monitoring, promoting not only the early detection of conditions like AF but also enabling chronic condition management [203,210]. The adoption of such technologies has been particularly beneficial for managing patient populations with a high burden of symptomatic heart disease, improving adherence to treatment plans and enhancing patient engagement in their care [198,211].
The utility of AI in wearable technology extends beyond mere arrhythmia detection; it includes comprehensive data analytics that can inform lifestyle modifications and preventive health measures. By analyzing data trends, AI-driven platforms can generate personalized health recommendations and alert patients or healthcare providers about significant changes in their heart rhythms, which is crucial during recovery phases following cardiac events [207,212].
Thus, the application of AI in ECG analysis holds promise for improving CV care across multiple dimensions, particularly in arrhythmia detection, assessment of hidden cardiac phenotypes, and continuous monitoring via wearable devices. As AI methods mature, the potential for enhancing diagnostic accuracy and clinical decision-making will continue to grow, which may lead to significant impacts on patient management and outcomes in cardiology. Future developments should focus on refining algorithmic approaches, improving integration with healthcare systems, and addressing the regulatory and ethical considerations inherent in deploying AI technologies in cardiology.

6. Predictive Analytics for CV Risk

Predictive analytics for CV risk is a rapidly evolving field that employs sophisticated algorithms and data-driven methodologies to improve the identification, stratification, and management of CV diseases. These advancements stand in contrast to traditional risk calculators, offering more nuanced insights and the potential for personalized patient care.

6.1. Risk Calculators vs. AI-Driven Models

Traditional CV risk calculators, such as the Framingham Risk Score, have been foundational in assessing the likelihood of events like heart attacks and strokes based on established risk factors including age, cholesterol levels, blood pressure (BP), smoking status, and diabetes [213]. These calculators are widely used in clinical practice due to their simplicity and the ability to apply practical guidelines across diverse populations [214]. However, they have limitations concerning accuracy, often failing to incorporate a multitude of emerging risk factors and patient-specific variables that can significantly influence risk [213,215]. In contrast, AI-driven models leverage advanced ML and DL techniques to refine CV risk predictions. These models can analyze vast datasets, including clinical data, genetic information, imaging studies, and even social determinants of health, providing a multifaceted view that can lead to more accurate predictions [216]. For example, the incorporation of advanced imaging data such as coronary artery calcium scores into AI models has demonstrated enhanced predictive capabilities compared to traditional scores [217]. ML techniques have shown improvements in predictive accuracy, with studies reporting enhancements in risk prediction by up to 3.6% when comparing conventional methods to AI algorithms [218]. AI models also have the capacity to learn from incoming data dynamically, adapting in real-time and improving prediction quality as more data becomes available. For instance, researchers have shown that using AI can yield specific insights about subclinical disease and risk patterns in populations that traditional models might not detect, allowing clinicians to take preemptive action [216]. Thus, while risk calculators are useful for initial assessments, AI-driven models facilitate a more comprehensive and personalized approach to CV risk assessment.

6.2. Early Detection of Subclinical Disease

One of the most significant advances in predictive analytics is the ability to identify subclinical CV disease, which often precedes clinical symptoms and events. AI algorithms can analyze patterns in ECGs or imaging studies to detect changes that may indicate left ventricular dysfunction or early atherosclerosis long before they manifest as acute clinical conditions [216]. For instance, leveraging ML on ECG data can uncover hidden phenotypes associated with CV risk, identifying individuals at risk before the onset of overt disease [205]. The application of carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) alongside AI can enhance CV risk prediction, as it provides insights into vascular health that traditional assessments may overlook [219]. AI models that include parameters like CIMT and endothelial function can significantly improve risk stratification for patients with stable angina, helping to identify those who may benefit from more aggressive preventive strategies [215]. Additionally, innovative hybrid models that incorporate data from multiple sources, such as radiological assessments combined with clinical variables, have demonstrated the ability to predict CV risk effectively [217]. By identifying subclinical disease early, clinicians can implement targeted interventions that significantly improve long-term outcomes, emphasizing the shift towards prevention in CV care [216].

6.3. Population Risk Stratification and Individualized Prevention

Predictive analytics also plays a critical role in population risk stratification, allowing healthcare professionals to categorize patients based on their risk profiles and tailor preventive interventions accordingly. Traditional risk calculators often generalize risk at a population level, leading to one-size-fits-all strategies that may not adequately address the unique needs of individual patients [214]. AI-driven analytics facilitates more granular stratification by incorporating a wide array of data points, including demographic, lifestyle, and clinical characteristics, thereby enabling more individualized prevention strategies [216,220]. For example, predictive models utilizing ML have been effective in stratifying populations by identifying high-risk subgroups that might benefit from specific interventions, such as lifestyle modifications or pharmacotherapy [220]. Moreover, the integration of wearable technology into risk stratification has the potential to revolutionize preventative care. Continuous monitoring devices can collect real-time data on heart rate, rhythm, and other biomarkers, which can feed into AI models to continually refine risk assessments and inform personalized strategies for prevention and treatment [221]. For instance, patients identified by AI as having increased CV risk could be monitored with wearable devices that detect arrhythmias or other CV anomalies, allowing for timely intervention [208].
Predictive analytics for CV risk represents a paradigm shift in how CV health is assessed and managed. The integration of AI-driven models enhances traditional risk calculators, enabling early detection of subclinical disease, improving population risk stratification, and allowing for individualized prevention strategies. As technology evolves, the future of CV care will likely focus on personalized patient management, leveraging the power of predictive analytics to optimize outcomes and reduce the burden of CV diseases globally.

7. AI in Hypertension

Hypertension affects more than one billion individuals worldwide and remains the leading modifiable risk factor for CV morbidity and mortality, contributing substantially to coronary artery disease, HF, stroke, and chronic kidney disease. Despite advances in pharmacotherapy and prevention, global BP control rates remain suboptimal. Conventional hypertension care relies on intermittent clinic-based BP measurements and population-averaged risk models, which are limited by observer bias, measurement variability, and an inability to capture the complex, dynamic regulation of BP over time. AI offers new opportunities to improve BP measurement, risk prediction, and individualized management by integrating large-scale, multimodal data sources [222].
AI systems excel at identifying latent patterns within high-dimensional datasets, including electronic health records (EHRs), physiological waveforms, wearable sensor data, and sociodemographic variables [223]. In hypertension, these capabilities enable earlier detection, more precise risk stratification, and personalized therapeutic strategies that extend beyond traditional statistical approaches.

7.1. Improving BP Measurement

Accurate BP measurement is foundational to hypertension diagnosis and management, yet traditional cuff-based methods are prone to white coat effects, observer bias, and limited reproducibility. AI-enhanced signal processing has facilitated the use of physiological waveforms, most notably photoplethysmography (PPG), to estimate BP continuously and non-invasively. ML models trained on PPG-derived features have demonstrated clinically relevant accuracy in distinguishing hypertensive from normotensive individuals and estimating systolic and diastolic BP, supporting the development of cuffless and wearable BP technologies.
Automated BP measurement devices (BPMDs) represent another important advance. Automated office BP monitoring (AOBP), which acquires multiple unattended measurements, reduces observer bias and anxiety-related BP elevation, producing values that more closely reflect ambulatory BP [224,225,226,227]. Numerous BPMDs have been validated against international standards, including AAMI and ESH protocols, and have demonstrated acceptable performance across diverse clinical settings [228,229,230,231]. However, accuracy limitations persist in certain populations, such as patients with arrhythmias or advanced chronic kidney disease, emphasizing the need for population-specific validation and careful device selection [232,233,234,235,236,237].
AI models have shown strong performance in predicting incident hypertension using demographic, clinical, and lifestyle variables. AUROC values have been reported to range from approximately 0.77 to 1.00 across ML models, including support vector machines, random forests, and gradient boosting approaches [238]. Large population-based studies, particularly in East Asian cohorts, demonstrated that ML models outperform traditional regression-based risk scores in predicting 5-year hypertension incidence, with age, baseline BP, BMI, and metabolic parameters emerging as key predictors [238,239]. Beyond conventional risk factors, DL techniques can extract novel digital biomarkers from routine diagnostic data. A DL-derived biomarker from standard 12-lead ECG recordings was shown to detect prevalent hypertension and stratify future CV risk independent of overt ECG abnormalities [240]. These findings illustrate how AI can uncover subclinical disease signatures embedded in widely available clinical tests, potentially enabling earlier intervention.

7.2. Clinical Management and Treatment Optimization

AI applications increasingly extend into hypertension management, particularly through remote BP monitoring and treatment optimization platforms. ML-driven systems can integrate longitudinal BP data, medication history, and patient characteristics to support individualized therapy adjustment and reduce therapeutic inertia [241]. These approaches mirror developments in other chronic diseases, where predictive models guide treatment selection and titration. Medication adherence remains a major determinant of BP control and a critical target for AI intervention. ML algorithms can identify patients at high risk for non-adherence based on behavioral, clinical, and socioeconomic factors [242,243]. AI-enabled mobile applications and conversational agents have demonstrated modest but consistent improvements in adherence by delivering personalized reminders, education, and motivational feedback [243,244,245]. At the health-system level, these tools enable proactive identification of adherence barriers and targeted deployment of support resources. Wearable technologies integrated with AI have shifted BP assessment from episodic measurement toward continuous monitoring. Cuffless BP devices based on PPG and related sensors, increasingly embedded in consumer wearables, allow frequent, real-world BP estimation when appropriately calibrated [246,247,248,249,250]. Continuous data streams analyzed by ML models enable assessment of BP variability, circadian patterns, and early dysregulation that may be missed by clinic-based measurements. Wearables also enhance patient engagement by providing real-time feedback and facilitating integration with telehealth platforms [251,252,253,254]. Wearable-enabled monitoring can improve adherence and patient involvement in hypertension management. At the population level, aggregated wearable data support risk stratification, epidemiologic surveillance, and targeted interventions, particularly in remote or underserved communities [250,255]. Nevertheless, concerns remain regarding data accuracy, device calibration, validation against reference standards, and long-term usability [256,257,258,259,260,261]. Standardized validation frameworks and clear clinical integration pathways are essential to ensure that wearable BP technologies augment, rather than complicate, hypertension care. AI also supports population-level hypertension management through geospatial and behavioral analytics. Geographic information systems can identify regional disparities in hypertension prevalence, treatment access, and outcomes, enabling targeted public health interventions [262,263,264,265]. Behavioral analytics derived from EHRs, mobile applications, and wearables allow identification of adherence barriers and tailoring of interventions to individual behavioral patterns [266,267,268,269,270]. Lifestyle modification remains central to hypertension prevention. AI-enhanced digital platforms support dietary change, physical activity, and weight management by delivering personalized recommendations and monitoring progress [271,272,273,274,275,276]. When integrated with community-based programs, these tools may amplify the reach and sustainability of prevention strategies.
Despite its promise, AI implementation in hypertension care faces significant challenges, including data quality limitations, algorithmic bias, lack of external validation, limited interpretability, and regulatory uncertainty [222]. Failures of some large-scale initiatives to generalize beyond controlled environments highlight the importance of rigorous real-world evaluation. Consensus frameworks emphasize improving BP measurement fidelity, ensuring representative datasets, adopting human-in-the-loop designs, and conducting prospective clinical trials as prerequisites for scalable deployment. Thus, AI offers substantial opportunities to improve hypertension care by enhancing BP measurement, enabling early detection, personalizing treatment, and supporting population-level prevention. However, current evidence supports its role as a clinician-augmenting technology rather than a replacement for clinical judgment. Thoughtful integration, rigorous validation, and ethical governance will be essential to realize the full potential of AI in reducing the global burden of hypertension and its CV consequences.

8. AI in HF Management

AI is revolutionizing the management of HF through various strategies, including automated phenotyping, prognostication of readmission risk, optimization of device therapy, and facilitating remote monitoring with sensors and AI-driven alerts.

8.1. Automated Phenotyping: HFrEF vs. HFpEF

Automated phenotyping plays a crucial role in distinguishing between various forms of HF, particularly HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Accurate phenotyping allows personalized treatment approaches tailored to the underlying mechanisms of each type of HF [277]. Traditional diagnostic methods often struggle to differentiate between HFrEF and HFpEF effectively, leading to misclassification and suboptimal management [278].
AI-driven models utilize ML algorithms to analyze vast amounts of clinical and biometric data to identify distinct phenotypic profiles indicative of HFrEF or HFpEF. For example, by employing echocardiographic data, laboratory values, and patient demographics, AI systems can generate predictive models that accurately classify patients’ HF types [279]. Such classification not only improves diagnostic precision but also enhances treatment strategies. For instance, patients with HFrEF may benefit significantly from specific HF medications like angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis); conversely, patients categorized as HFpEF often require different management strategies focusing on comorbid conditions such as hypertension and diabetes [280].

8.2. Prognostication and Readmission Risk Prediction

AI models play a pivotal role in prognostication and predicting the risk of readmission among HF patients. Readmissions pose a significant burden on healthcare systems and often negatively impact patient outcomes. Data-driven AI systems can analyze numerous risk factors, including medication adherence, vital signs, and historical hospitalization records to identify patients at high risk for readmission [281].
Recent studies employing AI algorithms have successfully developed predictive models that can stratify patients based on their likelihood of experiencing adverse events such as hospital readmission or mortality. For instance, the PARTNERS-HF study utilized ML to discern aspects influencing readmissions effectively, helping clinicians tailor follow-up and management plans to the patients most at risk [282]. Incorporating social determinants of health further enhances these models, allowing for a comprehensive assessment that goes beyond clinical data, thus improving prognostic accuracy [283].

8.3. Optimization of Device Therapy: ICDs and CRT

The optimization of device therapy, specifically implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), is being significantly enhanced through AI applications. ICDs are crucial for preventing sudden cardiac death in patients with specific risk factors, such as those with HFrEF and prior ventricular tachycardia episodes. Barriers to optimal ICD therapy adoption include patient selection criteria and the person’s overall prognosis as indicated by their left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class [284,285].
AI systems are employed to analyze EHRs and real-time clinical data to refine patient selection for ICD and CRT implantation. Such algorithms can provide insights into who may benefit most from device therapy by examining various clinical endpoints and patient characteristics [286]. The use of AI-enhanced tools is also advocated to predict prognosis and determine the appropriateness of device therapy, thereby promoting improved patient outcomes [287]. Using predictive modeling could enhance the identification of patients who will gain substantial mortality risk reduction from ICD therapy compared to standard medical management, particularly in certain populations such as those with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy [288,289]. Further exploration into optimizing the placement of leads in CRT patients through AI-driven simulations has also demonstrated potential improvements in patient outcomes [290].

8.4. Remote Monitoring with Sensors and AI-Driven Alerts

Recent advancements in remote monitoring technologies have transformed the management of HF patients using AI. Wearable sensors and mobile devices allow healthcare providers to monitor patient vitals continuously, facilitating early detection of decompensation [291,292]. AI algorithms analyze real-time data and provide actionable insights, allowing for timely interventions, thereby preventing hospitalizations.
For example, sensors capable of tracking changes in vital signs, such as heart rate and respiratory patterns, can trigger alerts to both healthcare teams and patients when deviations from normal ranges occur [293]. Utilizing AI-driven alerts in conjunction with remote monitoring was shown to significantly reduce HF hospitalizations by allowing for swift corrective actions based on patient health data [294].
Integrating AI with telehealth platforms enables healthcare professionals to maintain continuous engagement with patients, reinforcing adherence to treatment regimens while providing the necessary support for self-management of their condition [295,296,297]. Remote monitoring facilitated by AI-powered systems effectively empowers patients, allowing them to take proactive steps toward managing their HF, fostering a sense of control over their health [298].
AI-driven strategies for HF management are pivotal in improving patient outcomes through enhanced automated phenotyping, effective prognostication, optimization of device therapy, and continuous remote monitoring. The integration of AI into HF care provides opportunities for personalizing treatment, improving coordination among healthcare teams, and fostering patient empowerment through ongoing engagement. As technology continues to advance, embracing these AI applications will be essential in redefining HF management and elevating the quality of care offered to patients.

9. CAD and Acute Coronary Syndromes

AI is transforming the landscape of CADs and acute coronary syndromes (ACSs) through innovative applications in chest pain triage, prognostication, imaging techniques, and the prediction of major adverse CV events (MACEs).

9.1. AI in Chest Pain Triage and Risk Stratification in the Emergency Department

The assessment and triage of patients presenting with chest pain in the emergency department (ED) is critical for the timely management of potential acute coronary syndromes. Traditional approaches to chest pain evaluation involve standardized clinical assessments and diagnostic tests, which may not be sufficiently sensitive to accurately identify patients at risk [299]. AI-driven models, however, can enhance risk stratification by rapidly analyzing vast amounts of clinical data, including patient demographics, medical history, laboratory results, and imaging studies to identify high-risk individuals more effectively.
For instance, ML algorithms trained on large datasets have shown promising results in predicting the risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) based on presenting symptoms and physiological parameters [300]. These models can assist clinicians in making more informed decisions regarding further diagnostic testing or immediate interventions. AI-enhanced triage systems can significantly reduce door-to-needle or door-to-balloon times by streamlining the process of identifying patients who require immediate treatment [301].
The deployment of AI in the ED can facilitate the standardization of care pathways for patients presenting with chest pain, enabling quicker and more accurate evaluations that lead to prompt triage decisions. For example, predictive algorithms developed by researchers have successfully risk-stratified patients with chest pain, identifying those who would benefit most from expedited invasive procedures such as cardiac catheterization or stenting [302]. This capability enhances patient care by ensuring that interventions are tailored to individual risk profiles.

9.2. Image-Based Assessment: Coronary Angiography, IVUS, and OCT

The role of imaging technologies in diagnosing and managing CAD and ACS has expanded significantly, particularly with advancements in intravascular imaging modalities like intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT). While traditional coronary angiography remains the cornerstone for evaluating coronary anatomy and stenosis, IVUS and OCT offer critical insights into plaque characteristics and vascular morphology that are not always visible through angiography alone [300].
AI-driven image analysis tools can enhance the interpretation of angiograms and intravascular images by assisting in the identification and characterization of vulnerable plaques, which are associated with an increased risk of plaque rupture and acute coronary events [303]. For instance, combining IVUS and OCT approaches in assessing lesion morphology and composition could lead to better stratification of patients based on their risk profiles [304]. ML algorithms can process these imaging modalities, detecting subtle changes that may indicate impending complications, ultimately guiding timely intervention strategies.
One meta-analysis highlighted that patients receiving IVUS or OCT guidance during percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) experienced improved clinical outcomes compared to those managed with standard angiography methods alone, highlighting the importance of integrating advanced imaging techniques with AI tools to enhance procedural decision-making [305,306].

9.3. Prediction of Major Adverse CV Events (MACEs)

Predicting MACEs, including myocardial infarction, HF hospitalization, and coronary revascularization, is essential for effective CV disease management. AI has emerged as a powerful tool for calculating the risk of MACEs, drawing on extensive datasets that encompass clinical, laboratory, imaging, and demographic information. For example, researchers have developed predictive models utilizing ML techniques that analyze electronic health records to forecast the likelihood of future CV events among patients with CAD [307,308].
Integrating imaging-based assessments with predictive analytics can significantly enhance MACE prediction capabilities. In patients undergoing PCI, the incorporation of IVUS and OCT findings into AI models has improved the prognostic capacity for long-term adverse events [309]. These imaging modalities provide critical details such as plaque burden, integrity, and characteristics that traditional angiography may not capture, allowing for more precise risk stratification.
Utilizing AI models to analyze follow-up data from patients treated for ACS can improve prediction accuracy for MACEs significantly. These findings underscore the potential for AI algorithms to inform clinical decision-making and optimize post-treatment care plans based on anticipated risks [306,310]. As a result, AI’s role in risk prediction can lead to more personalized healthcare where preventative measures are tailored to individual risk profiles, ultimately reducing the burden of CV diseases.
The integration of AI in CAD and ACS demonstrates transformative potential across several domains. From enhancing chest pain triage and risk stratification in emergency settings to improving diagnostic accuracy via imaging and predicting major adverse CV events, AI technologies are redefining the standards of CV care. By incorporating advanced analytics and imaging modalities, healthcare providers can enhance patient outcomes and optimize treatment strategies tailored to individual risk profiles. Continued research and validation of these AI applications are essential to maximizing their impact within clinical practice and driving innovations in CV management.

10. Wearable Technologies and Remote Monitoring

The advent of wearable technologies and remote monitoring systems has significantly transformed the landscape of CV health management. This new dimension of healthcare delivery enables continuous tracking of vital signs, offers unprecedented access to real-time health data, and fosters enhanced patient engagement.

10.1. Smartwatches and Biosensors for Arrhythmia Detection

Smartwatches equipped with advanced biosensors represent a significant leap in the early detection and management of arrhythmias such as atrial fibrillation (AF). These devices utilize photoplethysmography (PPG) metrics to derive heart rhythm data non-invasively [311]. For instance, many smartwatches can continuously monitor heart rate and rhythm, detecting irregularities that may indicate AF, allowing for immediate reporting to the user and healthcare providers [312,313].
AI algorithms enhance these devices’ efficacy by analyzing PPG waveforms and identifying patterns linked to arrhythmias. Smartwatches can achieve diagnostic accuracy comparable to clinical standards, offering a scalable solution for arrhythmia screening. For example, smartwatch algorithms can accurately detect AF with a sensitivity of over 90% and specificity above 95% when validated against standard ECG readings [314].
The integration of real-time notifications from these wearables encourages user engagement and adherence to follow-up actions, increasing the likelihood of diagnosis and treatment initiation for arrhythmic conditions. AI-driven insights based on daily activity monitoring can prompt patients to seek medical attention when they demonstrate signs of potential arrhythmias, enhancing the cycle of care [315].

10.2. BP, Heart Rate Variability, Sleep, and Stress Monitoring

Wearable devices have also evolved to monitor multiple physiological parameters related to CV health, including BP, heart rate variability, sleep patterns, and stress levels. The ability to continuously track BP using cuffless devices represents a critical advancement in hypertension management. Wearable devices utilizing innovative technologies, such as PPG and ECG, can accurately estimate BP without traditional cuff methods [316,317].
Continuous BP monitoring has become an essential tool for identifying transient hypertension and managing chronic conditions. By bringing greater awareness of BP trends to patients, wearables empower them to actively participate in their health management [318]. For example, daily BP recordings from wearable devices allow users to correlate lifestyle factors (such as physical activity and sleep quality) with their BP readings, leading to more informed decisions about their health.
Heart rate variability is another key parameter measured by wearables that offers insights into the autonomic nervous system regulation and overall CV health. Monitoring heart rate variability can reveal stress levels and potential imbalances between sympathetic and parasympathetic activity, enabling users to adjust their lifestyle choices for better health outcomes. The data collated from such continuous monitoring can also assist healthcare professionals in developing individualized intervention strategies targeting stress reduction and lifestyle adjustments.

10.3. Digital Twins and Personalized CV Surveillance

The concept of digital twins refers to creating a virtual replica of a patient, utilizing real-time data from wearable devices and other health monitoring technologies [319]. This innovative approach allows for the simulation of various health scenarios, enabling healthcare providers to predict how patients will respond to treatments based on their unique physiological and behavioral data [319,320].
AI algorithms can analyze data patterns from wearables and medical histories to inform the virtual model, predicting the potential outcomes of different interventions. This capability is particularly valuable in CV health management, where understanding individual risks and responses to treatment can lead to truly personalized care plans [321,322]. For instance, simulations derived from digital twins can help identify optimal medication dosages or lifestyle modifications needed to mitigate hypertension risks and improve overall CV health [322].
The implementation of digital twins within telemedicine has the potential to enhance remote patient monitoring initiatives. By creating personalized digital profiles, clinicians can provide targeted, evidence-based recommendations while enabling timely adjustments to treatment based on ongoing physiological data from wearable sensors [317,323]. This level of personalized CV surveillance holds promise for improving patient adherence, promoting sustained engagement, and ultimately leading to better health outcomes.
So, the integration of wearable technologies and remote monitoring systems into CV health management presents transformative opportunities for early detection, personalized treatment, and improved patient engagement. From smartwatches facilitating arrhythmia detection to continuous monitoring of BP, heart rate variability, and lifestyle factors, these technologies enable proactive management of CV diseases. The emerging concept of digital twins further enhances personalized surveillance, paving the way for tailored interventions that respond to individual patient needs. As technology advances, the continuous refinement of wearable applications will be essential, ensuring they are accessible, reliable, and effective tools for managing CV health.

11. AI in Cardiac Procedures and Surgery

AI is increasingly being integrated into the field of cardiac procedures and surgery, enhancing diagnostic capabilities, optimizing treatment strategies, and improving patient outcomes. From decision support in interventional cardiology to remote patient monitoring, the role of AI continues to expand.

11.1. Decision Support in Interventional Cardiology

In interventional cardiology, AI-driven decision support systems play an integral role in diagnosing and treating CAD and ACS. These systems analyze vast amounts of clinical data, including patient history, test results, and procedural outcomes, to assist healthcare providers in making informed decisions during critical intervention procedures [324]. For instance, AI algorithms have been developed that can predict the likelihood of complications during PCIs, enabling cardiologists to tailor their approaches to individual patient needs, thus optimizing procedural outcomes [325].
AI systems assist in real-time decision-making by integrating data from various sources, including imaging studies, and offering recommendations on the best-practice treatment pathways. Such systems can enhance procedural efficiency and reduce adverse outcomes by providing cardiologists with actionable insights during interventions [326,327]. This use of AI not only aids in improving patient care but also fosters a more collaborative approach between clinicians and technology, ensuring that therapeutic decisions are data-driven and patient-centered.

11.2. Electrophysiology Mapping and Ablation Guidance

AI technologies are particularly beneficial in electrophysiology, especially for mapping and guiding ablation procedures in patients with arrhythmias. Electrophysiology mapping involves identifying areas of the heart responsible for abnormal rhythms, a process traditionally reliant on operator experience and manual interpretation of data collected during procedures. AI-enhanced mapping systems can analyze electrical signals more rapidly and accurately than human operators, improving the identification of arrhythmogenic substrates [328].
ML algorithms can process data from electrophysiological recordings, facilitating the creation of detailed maps that highlight potential targets for ablation. For example, the integration of AI in the CARTO 3 system has demonstrated improved accuracy in real-time mapping of atrial fibrillation during ablation procedures [329]. These systems not only augment procedural precision but also enhance patient safety by providing real-time feedback and alerts if abnormal patterns are detected, allowing timely intervention to prevent complications [330].
The predictive capabilities of AI can also extend to following ablation procedures, where ML models assess patient recovery paths and potential for recurrence, assisting clinicians in monitoring the long-term efficacy of treatment [331]. This comprehensive mapping and guidance provided by AI culminate in better procedural outcomes and improved long-term management strategies for patients with complex arrhythmias.

11.3. Robotics and AI in Cardiac Surgery

Robotic-assisted surgeries have revolutionized minimally invasive techniques in cardiac procedures, providing enhanced precision, reduced recovery times, and improved cosmesis. The da Vinci Surgical System, the most recognized robotic platform, enables surgeons to perform complex operations with enhanced dexterity and visualization [332]. The integration of AI into robotic surgery systems facilitates autonomous functions, allowing for improved surgical planning, execution, and adaptability to real-time changes in the operative environment [333].
AI applications are currently being developed to enhance robotic systems, potentially allowing for intelligent automation of repetitive tasks. For example, AI could assist by providing surgeons with enhanced data analytics for preoperative planning, analyzing anatomical structures and generating individualized surgical approaches based on a patient’s unique characteristics [334]. Robotic systems with AI capabilities can process vast amounts of intraoperative data, offering real-time feedback on patient physiology, thus allowing for dynamic surgical adjustments as needed [335,336].
The combination of robotic systems and AI applications can also facilitate training and skill assessment for new surgeons, utilizing advanced visualization and performance feedback mechanisms to enhance learning outcomes [337]. The virtuous cycle of iterative learning and performance enhancement harnessed via AI and robotics ultimately elevates patient care standards in cardiac surgery.

11.4. AI for Perioperative Risk Prediction

AI’s application in perioperative risk prediction represents another crucial avenue of development in cardiac procedures. Assessing the risk associated with surgical interventions is pivotal for optimizing patient outcomes and minimizing complications. Traditional risk scoring systems, while useful, often lack the granularity and predictive power afforded by AI-driven models [338].
AI algorithms can analyze preoperative data, including medical history, comorbidities, and laboratory results, to predict patient outcomes with remarkable accuracy. For instance, models that incorporate ML techniques can evaluate risk-adjusted outcomes and provide stratifications that inform surgical candidacy based on individual profiles [339,340]. These AI-based predictive models can outperform conventional models in identifying patients at heightened risk for postoperative complications, including prolonged hospitalization or adverse CV events [325,341]. The integration of AI in preoperative settings can provide surgeons with actionable insights, enabling them to explore alternative strategies or optimize interventions tailored to individual patients’ risk factors. Moreover, enhancing risk prediction accuracy contributes directly to informed consent processes, ensuring that patients are adequately educated about the potential risks and benefits of their surgical procedures [342,343].
AI is poised to significantly impact cardiac procedures and surgery through enhanced decision support, advanced electrophysiology mapping, robotic assistance, and improved perioperative risk prediction. These innovations promise to refine clinical practice, optimizing patient outcomes while reducing complications. As AI technologies continue to evolve, ongoing research and development are essential to ensure effective integration into clinical workflows, maximizing their benefits for cardiac patients and healthcare systems alike.

12. Pharmacotherapy and Drug Discovery

The integration of AI in pharmacotherapy and drug discovery for CV diseases has opened new avenues for improving treatment outcomes and enhancing patient adherence.

12.1. AI in Drug Repurposing for CV Diseases

Drug repurposing, or repositioning existing medications for new therapeutic uses, is a cost-effective strategy in drug discovery that can accelerate the availability of treatments for CV diseases. AI plays a pivotal role in this process by employing ML algorithms to analyze large biological datasets, drug interactions, and patient response profiles. For instance, AI algorithms can identify potential candidates from existing drug libraries by correlating molecular data with disease etiology, thereby facilitating the discovery of new uses for well-known medications [344].
AI models can assess molecular structures and pathways associated with CV diseases, revealing unexpected effects of drugs originally developed for other conditions. For example, antihypertensive agents have been repurposed for managing HF and drugs initially designed for diabetes treatment can be used in patients with CAD [345]. This propensity for AI to rapidly identify promising repurposing options streamlines the research process and significantly reduces the time and costs associated with traditional drug discovery pathways.
AI can help prioritize drug repurposing candidates by evaluating their pharmacokinetics, existing safety profiles, and historical efficacy data. Algorithms that assess real-world evidence and clinical trial data can provide insights into the likelihood of success for certain drugs, enabling researchers and clinicians to make informed decisions regarding potential new treatments for CV diseases [346]. The integration of AI into repurposing efforts guarantees a more streamlined and efficient path to discovering effective treatments.

12.2. Predicting Drug Response and Adverse Events

AI’s capacity to predict individual patient responses to medications is especially critical in the context of pharmacotherapy for CV diseases, where patient variability can significantly affect treatment efficacy [347]. ML algorithms can analyze diverse datasets, including genetic information, demographic factors, and concurrent health conditions, to develop predictive models of how patients will respond to specific medications [348].
Using AI for adverse event prediction is equally significant. Understanding which patients are at risk for drug-related side effects, such as reactions to antiplatelet therapy or anticoagulant drugs, can help healthcare providers tailor treatment plans accordingly. For example, AI-driven analysis of patient records can identify historical trends related to the adverse events associated with specific medications, allowing clinicians to engage in proactive management strategies [349]. Predictive AI models can accurately forecast adverse drug events, assisting in clinical decision-making and encouraging patient-centered care [350].
AI-driven analytics can also facilitate the identification of drug-drug interactions and patient-specific risk factors. ML models can analyze patient characteristics alongside pharmacological data to predict interactions that may exacerbate conditions or lead to adverse outcomes, thereby augmenting patient safety [351]. Such predictive capabilities underscore the potential for AI to enhance pharmacovigilance, which is essential for promoting safe medication practices in CV care.

12.3. AI-Based Digital Therapeutics and Medication Adherence Monitoring

AI technologies have led to the development of digital therapeutics aimed at promoting medication adherence among patients with CV diseases. These interventions utilize mobile applications, web platforms, and wearable devices to monitor patients’ medication-taking behaviors in real-time and provide customized reminders, educational content, and motivational support [352].
AI-based interventions can significantly enhance adherence rates. For instance, integrating a smartphone application that utilizes AI algorithms to analyze data related to medication adherence has been reported to improve adherence rates among patients prescribed antihypertensive medications [353]. By sending personalized alerts according to individual medication regimens, these applications can reduce forgetfulness, which is a common barrier to medication adherence [352].
Digital therapeutics can implement behavioral nudges based on AI analytics, which adapt to patients’ unique patterns and preferences. These personalized strategies align with the principles of behavioral economics, fundamentally altering how patients perceive their medication regimens and fostering consistent adherence behaviors [354]. By aiding patients in tracking their health metrics and engaging them in goal-setting, these digital therapeutics empower individuals to take control of their CV health, promoting preventive care and reducing the risk of acute events due to non-adherence.
AI-driven strategies in pharmacotherapy and drug discovery for CV diseases promise to transform the management of treatment regimens and improve patient outcomes. AI’s potential for drug repurposing, predicting drug responses and adverse events, and supporting digital therapeutics for medication adherence monitoring clearly illustrates its value across the CV spectrum. As technology continues to evolve, the integration of AI in pharmacotherapy will likely promote personalized medicine approaches, enhance adherence rates, and foster better management of CV diseases.

13. Genomics, Multi-Omics, and Precision Cardiology

The integration of genomics, proteomics, and metabolomics with AI marks a significant advancement in precision cardiology. This convergence enables a deeper understanding of CV diseases and provides innovative pathways for personalized treatment strategies.

13.1. Integration of Genomics, Proteomics, Metabolomics with AI

The incorporation of omics technologies (including genomics, proteomics, and metabolomics) creates a comprehensive dataset that reflects the intricate pathophysiology of CV diseases. AI techniques facilitate the analysis of these extensive datasets, enabling the identification of patterns challenging to discern through conventional statistical methods. For instance, genomic sequencing can uncover genetic variants associated with elevated CV risk, while proteomic and metabolomic studies can highlight changes in protein expression and metabolite concentrations indicative of disease progression [327,355].
AI-driven algorithms, particularly those utilizing ML and DL methodologies, excel at processing high-dimensional data across various omic layers to extract meaningful insights. Models based on genomic data can predict individual patient responses to treatments based on their genetic backgrounds, thereby assisting in tailoring therapies [356]. Additionally, integrating proteomic data with clinical information through AI analysis can enhance classification accuracy for HF phenotypes and other CV conditions [252]. This multi-omic framework improves diagnostic pathways by providing a more holistic overview of biological processes in CV patients.

13.2. Identification of Novel Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets

AI’s analytical capabilities play a crucial role in discovering novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets for CV diseases. Biomarkers serve essential functions in diagnostics, prognostics, and assessing therapeutic responses. AI can expedite biomarker discovery by scrutinizing extensive datasets from clinical trials, patient registries, and laboratory findings [357]. For example, ML algorithms have been employed to identify biomarkers related to HF, including specific microRNAs that correlate with disease severity and therapeutic response [358].
Moreover, AI facilitates the identification of potential therapeutic targets by examining gene expression patterns and proteomic data to uncover molecules suitable for therapeutic modulation. A notable example includes the identification of pyruvate kinase M2 as a potential regulator in atherosclerosis, with AI models indicating how targeting this enzyme could create new therapeutic opportunities [359]. By streamlining the discovery and validation of such targets, AI-driven approaches significantly enhance the toolkit available for managing CV diseases.

13.3. Personalized Care Guided by AI-Enabled Omics Analysis

AI’s integration into precision cardiology ultimately manifests in its ability to tailor patient care through AI-enabled omics analyses. This personalized approach aligns treatment protocols with the unique genetic, proteomic, and metabolomic profiles of individual patients, allowing for targeted therapies that optimize clinical outcomes [360]. For instance, using genomic data analysis, clinicians can select medications that are predicted to be more effective based on the patient’s genetic profile, thereby reducing the likelihood of adverse reactions and improving therapeutic efficacy [361].
AI can continuously refine treatment strategies by utilizing real-time patient data. Digital health technologies, including wearable devices that monitor physiological parameters, can supply data to AI algorithms that continuously update patient profiles [362]. This dynamic feedback loop offers clinicians the flexibility to modify treatment plans based on ongoing assessments of CV health and therapy responses, which can enhance adherence and patient engagement [363].
AI-driven platforms that visualize multi-omics data empower healthcare providers to interpret complex biological interactions intuitively, allowing for tailored interventions based on a comprehensive understanding of each patient’s health condition [364]. As healthcare shifts toward personalized medicine, the integration of AI with omics data will be critical for enhancing precision cardiology and effectively managing CV diseases.
The synergy between AI and multi-omics delineates a transformative pathway in precision cardiology that improves diagnostic accuracy, personalizes treatment strategies, and fosters the identification of novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets. As the field evolves, the integration of AI with genomic, proteomic, and metabolomic data will further enhance our understanding of CV diseases while promoting individualized healthcare interventions. Ongoing research and development in these technologies will be paramount for optimizing patient outcomes and shaping the future of CV medicine.

15. Challenges and Barriers to Clinical Adoption

The use of AI in cardiology has significantly enhanced diagnostic capabilities, treatment outcomes, and patient management. However, challenges and barriers to the clinical adoption of AI technologies remain.

15.1. Data Quality, Reproducibility, and Generalizability

The effectiveness of AI in clinical applications largely depends on the quality of the data used to train ML algorithms. High-quality data is essential for developing robust and reliable AI models capable of yielding accurate predictions and diagnoses. Many datasets, however, contain missing values, errors, or inconsistencies that can introduce biases and affect the model’s performance [381]. This issue is particularly pronounced in cardiology, which often relies on varied and heterogeneous data sources, including EHRs, imaging data, and genomic profiles. Inconsistent data formats and terminologies across institutions exacerbate these challenges, leading to concerns about the reproducibility of AI findings and generalizability to diverse patient populations.
AI algorithms trained on data from specific cohorts may not perform equivalently when applied to broader populations due to variations in demographics and clinical presentations. For instance, an AI model developed using an urban population may not accurately predict CV events in rural settings, emphasizing the need for diversity in training datasets. Addressing these issues involves improving data collection methodologies and implementing standardized protocols for data-sharing across institutions [381].

15.2. Integration into Clinical Workflow and EHR Systems

Integrating AI technologies into existing clinical workflows and EHR systems presents another significant barrier. AI applications must be seamlessly incorporated into the daily practices of healthcare professionals to enhance rather than disrupt their work [382]. When AI tools are introduced without consideration for clinical workflow, there is a risk of clinician resistance, confusion, and decreased efficiency.
For successful integration, AI tools should complement clinical decision-making processes, providing clinicians with actionable insights without overwhelming them with complex outputs. User-friendly interfaces that facilitate easy interaction with AI algorithms can promote the adoption and utilization of these technologies in practice [383]. Training healthcare professionals to use AI tools effectively alongside their clinical expertise is essential for optimizing AI’s benefits in cardiology [367,384].
Compliance with regulations surrounding EHR interoperability and data security must be addressed to ensure that AI tools can access necessary patient data while adhering to privacy standards. Collaborative initiatives engaging stakeholders, including healthcare professionals, software developers, and regulatory bodies, can facilitate the development of integrated solutions that promote effective AI adoption [366,385].

15.3. Physician Acceptance and AI Literacy in Cardiology Training

The acceptance of AI technologies among healthcare professionals is crucial for successful clinical adoption. Many clinicians may be apprehensive about AI’s role in decision-making, fearing that it could undermine their expertise or result in a dependence on technology [198]. Bridging this gap requires comprehensive educational initiatives aimed at enhancing AI literacy among healthcare providers, demonstrating how these technologies can support rather than supplant clinical judgment.
Training programs in cardiology should include AI fundamentals, enabling practitioners to understand the mechanisms, capabilities, and limitations of AI systems [368]. Clinicians engaged in AI-related research or development are more likely to embrace these technologies, fostering a culture of innovation and openness to change within the medical community [386]. Involving clinicians in the development process of AI applications ensures that these tools address practical clinical needs and incorporate expert feedback, encouraging acceptance among potential users [308,387].
While the potential for AI in cardiology is substantial, several challenges and barriers must be addressed for its successful clinical adoption. Ensuring data quality, addressing integration issues within clinical workflows and EHR systems, and fostering physician acceptance through education and training are critical areas needing ongoing attention. By navigating these hurdles collaboratively, the healthcare community can leverage AI to enhance CV care, improve patient outcomes, and usher in a new era of precision medicine.

16. Future Perspectives: Toward an AI-Augmented Cardiologist

The future of cardiology is characterized by the increasing integration of AI in clinical practice, leading to the emergence of AI-augmented cardiology. This transformation hinges on the collaboration between human expertise and AI technologies, fostering new opportunities for improved patient care.

16.1. The Role of Hybrid Intelligence (Human + AI Collaboration)

Hybrid intelligence, defined as the collaborative synergy between human clinicians and AI systems, is essential for optimizing decision-making processes in cardiology. Clinicians possess invaluable clinical expertise, intuition, and the ability to consider the nuances of individual patient circumstances. AI can complement these strengths by providing rapid data analysis, identifying patterns within complex datasets, and supporting diagnostic accuracy [388].
For instance, AI-powered tools can analyze extensive datasets from EHRs, imaging studies, and genetic information to deliver insights that enhance clinical judgment. This partnership allows cardiologists to focus on their strengths, such as patient interactions and assessments, while AI diligently parses data and identifies potential issues [389]. Clinicians utilizing AI decision support tools are more likely to arrive at timely, accurate diagnoses, ultimately improving patient outcomes [390].
Integrating AI in the clinician’s workflow can help mitigate cognitive overload in decision-making processes, making the practice of cardiology more efficient and data-driven. Building trust in AI-assisted systems is paramount for their acceptance; ongoing education and training in utilizing these tools will be crucial for fostering collaboration [391].

16.2. Prospects of Fully Autonomous Systems vs. Decision Support

While the current focus is on hybrid intelligence, discussions surrounding fully autonomous AI systems in cardiology are gaining traction. Fully autonomous AI systems hold the potential to revolutionize CV care through their ability to process complex information rapidly and make independent decisions; however, such systems have yet to be widely implemented in clinical settings [392].
AI platforms, once equipped for autonomous operation, may analyze patient data and diagnostic results, providing treatment recommendations based on algorithms that continually learn from new data. However, ethical considerations, such as accountability and transparency, remain critical issues that need to be addressed before physicians could reliably depend on these systems entirely [393].
On the other hand, decision support tools, which utilize AI to assist in clinical scenarios, will likely prevail in the near term. By providing clinicians with decision-enhancing insights rather than replacing their expertise, decision support systems will continue to thrive in clinical practice. This balanced approach enables AI to act as a partner in decision-making rather than a fully independent agent, ensuring that human clinical judgment remains essential in patient care [375].

16.3. Long-Term Vision: Reshaping Research, Education, and Clinical Care

The long-term vision for AI in cardiology envisions an environment where research, education, and clinical practice are seamlessly integrated. As the utilization of AI continues to grow, the landscape of CV research will also evolve, emphasizing the need for interdisciplinary collaboration among cardiologists, data scientists, and bioinformatics specialists [390]. The ability to combine diverse types of data, from large-scale genetic studies to real-time monitoring data, will facilitate innovative discoveries and enhance the understanding of CV diseases.
Education and training programs must also adapt to prepare future cardiologists for a landscape valuing hybrid intelligence and integration of AI tools. Curricula need to encompass foundational knowledge of AI principles, data analytics, and ethical considerations surrounding AI applications in clinical settings [394]. By equipping cardiologists with the necessary skills to navigate AI-driven environments, the field can ensure that these technologies are used responsibly and effectively [395].
In clinical care, the shift towards AI-augmented cardiology offers the promise of enhancing patient outcomes through precision medicine approaches tailored to individual profiles. AI-enabled predictive analytics can inform treatment decisions, enhance risk stratification, and support patient engagement in self-management [396]. Ultimately, fostering a culture of innovation and collaboration will be essential for realizing the full potential of AI in cardiology, thereby improving the quality of care delivered to patients [397,398,399,400].

17. Conclusions

AI is undeniably reshaping CV medicine, offering unprecedented opportunities to improve diagnosis, risk prediction, and patient management. Importantly, AI should not be framed as a replacement for clinical judgment, but rather as a complementary partner that augments human expertise through data-driven insights and precision analytics. Yet, the clinical impact of AI in cardiology remains heterogeneous, varying substantially across applications and stages of maturity. A realistic appraisal of AI’s role therefore requires stratification by clinical readiness, alongside a candid acknowledgment of failed translations, unmet needs, and implementation challenges.
Ranking AI applications by clinical readiness provides a pragmatic lens through which to distinguish technologies that meaningfully improve care today from those that remain investigational. High-readiness applications are already embedded in routine or near-routine clinical practice, particularly in electrocardiography and cardiac imaging. These tools have progressed beyond proof-of-concept and are now integrated into commercial ECG systems and consumer wearables, illustrating a rare alignment of technical performance, workflow integration, and clinical utility. Similarly, AI-driven automation in echocardiography, particularly for left ventricular ejection fraction quantification, has achieved strong concordance with expert readers. Beyond accuracy, these systems improve reproducibility and significantly reduce interpretation time, addressing longstanding sources of interobserver variability in imaging-based decision-making. These examples illustrate that AI adoption accelerates when algorithms solve clearly defined clinical problems, operate within established workflows, and deliver immediate, measurable efficiency gains. However, widespread clinical uptake has been constrained by limited prospective validation, unclear thresholds for actionability, and poor integration into clinician decision pathways. These challenges underscore a recurring theme in AI deployment: predictive accuracy alone is insufficient without a clear linkage to clinical decisions and outcomes. Low-readiness applications remain largely confined to research settings. Concepts such as digital twins, reinforcement learning-guided therapy optimization, and multi-omics driven decision support represent compelling visions for the future of personalized CV care.
Realizing the full clinical promise of AI in cardiology requires a deliberate and structured translational roadmap. One of the most persistent barriers remains reimbursement. AI tools are rarely reimbursed as standalone interventions, limiting institutional incentives for adoption and sustained maintenance. Progress will depend on alignment with value-based care models and incorporation into existing CPT or DRG frameworks, ensuring that AI-enabled efficiencies and outcome improvements are economically recognized. Equally critical is clinician education and AI literacy. Rather than emphasizing coding proficiency, training programs should focus on the interpretation, limitations, bias recognition, and ethical implications of AI outputs. Preparing cardiologists to critically engage with AI tools will be essential for the safe and effective integration into practice.
Looking ahead, several priority directions are poised to define the next decade of AI in cardiology. First, prospective, randomized trials evaluating AI as an intervention (rather than merely a predictor) are essential to demonstrate improvements in clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness. Second, explainable and trustworthy AI must evolve beyond post hoc interpretability toward models that are transparent by design, enabling clinicians to understand and interrogate algorithmic reasoning. Third, equity-aware AI development, grounded in diverse and global datasets, is critical to avoid widening CV health disparities. Fourth, continuous learning systems capable of safe post-deployment updating will better reflect real-world clinical dynamics. Finally, the integration of multimodal and longitudinal data (spanning imaging, genomics, wearables, and social determinants of health) will be central to achieving truly personalized CV care.
Ultimately, the trajectory of AI in cardiology points toward a future of integrative, data-enriched, and patient-centered care. Patients are increasingly receptive to AI technologies when they enhance diagnostic accuracy and decision-making support, yet concerns about depersonalization and loss of human contact persist. Maintaining empathy, transparency, and clinician oversight within AI-augmented care models will therefore be essential to fostering public trust. When deployed thoughtfully and evaluated rigorously, AI has the potential to transform CV medicine, advancing diagnostic precision, improving outcomes, and enabling a more equitable and efficient delivery of care. The challenge now lies not in proving what AI can do, but in ensuring that it is implemented responsibly, ethically, and in service of real-world CV health.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.S.; methodology, S.S.J. and F.V.; formal analysis, F.V. and U.K.; data curation, S.S.J.; writing—original draft preparation, F.V. and U.K.; writing—review and editing, G.S.; funding acquisition, G.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Prof. Santulli was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health (NIH): National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI: #R01-HL146691, #R01-HL164772, #R01-HL159062), National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK: #R01-DK123259, #R01-DK033823), and by the American Heart Association (AHA, #24IPA1268813). Dr. Jankauskas was supported in part by a postdoctoral fellowship of the AHA (#AHA21836407). Dr. Varzideh was supported in part by the AHA (#AHA22915561 and #AHA241195524). Dr. Kansakar was supported in part by a postdoctoral fellowship of the AHA (#AHA231026190) and by the NIH (#T32-HL-172255).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Turing, A.M. Computing Machinery and Intelligence. Mind 1950, LIX, 433–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  2. Miller, R.A.; Pople, H.E., Jr.; Myers, J.D. Internist-1, an experimental computer-based diagnostic consultant for general internal medicine. N. Engl. J. Med. 1982, 307, 468–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  3. Esmaeili, P.; Roshanravan, N.; Ghaffari, S.; Mesri Alamdari, N.; Asghari-Jafarabadi, M. Unraveling atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk factors through conditional probability analysis with Bayesian networks: Insights from the AZAR cohort study. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 4361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  4. Wang, W.; Song, X.T.; Chen, Y.D.; Yang, X.S.; Xu, F.; Zhang, M.; Tan, K.; Yuan, F.; Li, D.; Lyu, S.Z. Prediction of risk of cardiovascular events in patients with mild to moderate coronary artery lesions using naive Bayesian networks. J. Geriatr. Cardiol. 2016, 13, 899–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  5. Tylman, W.; Waszyrowski, T.; Napieralski, A.; Kaminski, M.; Trafidlo, T.; Kulesza, Z.; Kotas, R.; Marciniak, P.; Tomala, R.; Wenerski, M. Real-time prediction of acute cardiovascular events using hardware-implemented Bayesian networks. Comput. Biol. Med. 2016, 69, 245–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  6. Roberts, J.M.; Parlikar, T.A.; Heldt, T.; Verghese, G.C. Bayesian networks for cardiovascular monitoring. In 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, New York, NY, USA, 30 August–3 September 2006; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2006; pp. 205–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  7. Cooper, G.F.; Aliferis, C.F.; Ambrosino, R.; Aronis, J.; Buchanan, B.G.; Caruana, R.; Fine, M.J.; Glymour, C.; Gordon, G.; Hanusa, B.H.; et al. An evaluation of machine-learning methods for predicting pneumonia mortality. Artif. Intell. Med. 1997, 9, 107–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  8. Mani, S.; Shankle, W.R.; Dick, M.B.; Pazzani, M.J. Two-Stage Machine Learning model for guideline development. Artif. Intell. Med. 1999, 16, 51–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  9. Kukar, M.; Kononenko, I.; Groselj, C.; Kralj, K.; Fettich, J. Analysing and improving the diagnosis of ischaemic heart disease with machine learning. Artif. Intell. Med. 1999, 16, 25–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  10. Miramontes, S.; Ferguson, E.L.; Zimmerman, S.; Phelps, E.; Oskotsky, B.; Oskotsky, T.T.; Capra, J.A.; Tsoy, E.; Sirota, M.; Glymour, M.M. Social and Cardiovascular Risk Factors as Predictors of the Progression from Mild Cognitive Impairment to Dementia in a Large EHR Database. medRxiv 2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  11. Zhou, T.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, D.; Jhaveri, R.; Chen, J.; Becich, M.J.; Castro, L.; Chen, Y.; Chilukuri, N.; Herring, S.J.; et al. Pre-COVID-19 body mass index and post-acute cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, and neuropsychiatric outcomes among children and young adults with SARS-CoV-2 infection: An EHR-based cohort study from the RECOVER Initiative. J. Infect. 2026, 92, 106702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  12. Ryu, H.; Lee, M.; Kim, S.H.; Kim, J.H.; Yang, H.J. Federated Learning for Cardiovascular Disease Prediction: A Comparative Review of Biosignal- and EHR-Based Approaches. Healthcare 2025, 13, 525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  13. Zhang, B.; Thacker, D.; Zhou, T.; Zhang, D.; Lei, Y.; Chen, J.; Chrischilles, E.; Christakis, D.A.; Fernandez, S.; Garg, V.; et al. Post-Acute Cardiovascular Outcomes of COVID-19 in Children and Adolescents: An EHR Cohort Study from the RECOVER Project. medRxiv 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  14. Shah, N.P.; Peterson, E.D.; Page, C.; Blanco, R.; Navar, A.M. Generalizability of an EHR-network dataset to the United States for cardiovascular disease conditions: Comparison of Cerner real world data with the national inpatient sample. Am. Heart J. 2023, 263, 64–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  15. Drawz, P.E.; Rai, N.K.; Lenoir, K.M.; Suarez, M.; Powell, J.R.; Raj, D.S.; Beddhu, S.; Agarwal, A.K.; Soman, S.; Whelton, P.K.; et al. Effect of Intensive versus Standard BP Control on AKI and Subsequent Cardiovascular Outcomes and Mortality: Findings from the SPRINT EHR Study. Kidney360 2022, 3, 1253–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  16. Kim, J.H.; Butler, A.M.; Ta, C.N.; Sun, Y.; Maurer, M.S.; Weng, C. The potential role of EHR data in optimizing eligibility criteria definition for cardiovascular outcome trials. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2021, 156, 104587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  17. Foraker, R.E.; Davidson, E.C.; Dressler, E.V.; Wells, B.J.; Lee, S.C.; Klepin, H.D.; Winkfield, K.M.; Hundley, W.G.; Payne, P.R.O.; Lai, A.M.; et al. Addressing cancer survivors’ cardiovascular health using the automated heart health assessment (AH-HA) EHR tool: Initial protocol and modifications to address COVID-19 challenges. Contemp. Clin. Trials Commun. 2021, 22, 100808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  18. Lewinski, A.A.; Bosworth, H.B.; Goldstein, K.M.; Gierisch, J.M.; Jazowski, S.; McCant, F.; White-Clark, C.; Smith, V.A.; Zullig, L.L. Improving cardiovascular outcomes by using team-supported, EHR-leveraged, active management: Disseminating a successful quality improvement project. Contemp. Clin. Trials Commun. 2021, 21, 100705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  19. Mensink, T.; Verbeek, J.; Perronnin, F.; Csurka, G. Distance-based image classification: Generalizing to new classes at near-zero cost. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2013, 35, 2624–2637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  20. Baheti, B.; Pati, S.; Menze, B.; Bakas, S. Leveraging 2D Deep Learning ImageNet-trained models for Native 3D Medical Image Analysis. Brainlesion 2023, 13769, 68–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  21. Jin, L.; Tan, F.; Jiang, S. Generative Adversarial Network Technologies and Applications in Computer Vision. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2020, 2020, 1459107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  22. Kossen, T.; Subramaniam, P.; Madai, V.I.; Hennemuth, A.; Hildebrand, K.; Hilbert, A.; Sobesky, J.; Livne, M.; Galinovic, I.; Khalil, A.A.; et al. Synthesizing anonymized and labeled TOF-MRA patches for brain vessel segmentation using generative adversarial networks. Comput. Biol. Med. 2021, 131, 104254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  23. Gonzalez-Juanatey, C.; Anguita-Sanchez, M.; Barrios, V.; Nunez-Gil, I.; Gomez-Doblas, J.J.; Garcia-Moll, X.; Lafuente-Gormaz, C.; Rollan-Gomez, M.J.; Peral-Disdier, V.; Martinez-Dolz, L.; et al. Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Coronary Type 2 Diabetic Patients: Identification of Associated Factors Using Electronic Health Records and Natural Language Processing. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 6004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  24. Sarraju, A.; Coquet, J.; Zammit, A.; Chan, A.; Ngo, S.; Hernandez-Boussard, T.; Rodriguez, F. Using deep learning-based natural language processing to identify reasons for statin nonuse in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Commun. Med. 2022, 2, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  25. Zaman, S.; Petri, C.; Vimalesvaran, K.; Howard, J.; Bharath, A.; Francis, D.; Peters, N.; Cole, G.D.; Linton, N. Automatic Diagnosis Labeling of Cardiovascular MRI by Using Semisupervised Natural Language Processing of Text Reports. Radiol. Artif. Intell. 2022, 4, e210085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  26. Berman, A.N.; Biery, D.W.; Ginder, C.; Hulme, O.L.; Marcusa, D.; Leiva, O.; Wu, W.Y.; Cardin, N.; Hainer, J.; Bhatt, D.L.; et al. Natural language processing for the assessment of cardiovascular disease comorbidities: The cardio-Canary comorbidity project. Clin. Cardiol. 2021, 44, 1296–1304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  27. Zhan, X.; Humbert-Droz, M.; Mukherjee, P.; Gevaert, O. Structuring clinical text with AI: Old versus new natural language processing techniques evaluated on eight common cardiovascular diseases. Patterns 2021, 2, 100289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  28. Khalifa, A.; Meystre, S. Adapting existing natural language processing resources for cardiovascular risk factors identification in clinical notes. J. Biomed. Inform. 2015, 58, S128–S132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  29. Wang, Y.; Tan, W.; Cheng, S.; Peng, C.; Peng, J.; Qin, F.; Tang, L.; Zhu, T.; Wu, B.; Liu, J.; et al. Large Language Model Agent for Managing Patients with Suspected Hypertension. Hypertension 2026, 83, 212–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  30. Yang, H.; Fan, C.; Liu, C. Development and validation of a machine learning model to predict comorbid hypertension in patients with type 2 diabetes. Front. Med. 2026, 13, 1754916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  31. Yang, M.; Wu, L.; Zeng, Y.; Zhao, C.; Ye, H.; Wang, J.; Hao, R. Smart Community Hypertension Management: A Narrative Review of Promises and Challenges. J. Multidiscip. Healthc. 2026, 19, 583914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  32. Yao, Q.; Qiu, B.; He, L.; Wang, Q.; Zou, J.; Liang, D.; Wen, S.; Liu, Y.; Li, G.; Hu, J.; et al. Effects of Artificial Intelligence Recognition-Based Telerehabilitation on Exercise Capacity in Patients with Hypertension: Randomized Controlled Trial. J. Med. Internet Res. 2026, 28, e81400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  33. Zand, J.; Miao, J.; Hommos, M.S.; Schwartz, G.L.; Taler, S.J.; Nejat, P.; Cheungpasitporn, W.; Garovic, V.D.; Zoghby, Z.M. Performance of Large Language Models in Analyzing Common Hypertension Scenarios. Hypertension 2026, 83, 225–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  34. Delombaerde, D.; Oeste, C.L.; Geldhof, V.; Croes, L.; Bassez, I.; Verbiest, A.; Tack, L.; Hens, D.; Franssen, C.; Debruyne, P.R.; et al. Cardiovascular toxicities in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: Multicenter study using natural language processing on Belgian hospital data. ESMO Real. World Data Digit. Oncol. 2025, 7, 100111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  35. Joseph, S.; Bhardwaj, A.; Skariah, J.; Aggarwal, I.; Shah, V.; Harris, R.A. Effects of education level on natural language processing in cardiovascular health communication. Front. Public. Health 2025, 13, 1688173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  36. Ngaruiya, C.; Samad, Z.; Tajuddin, S.; Nasim, Z.; Leff, R.; Farhad, A.; Pires, K.; Khan, M.A.; Hartz, L.; Safdar, B. Identification of Gender Differences in Acute Myocardial Infarction Presentation and Management at Aga Khan University Hospital-Pakistan: Natural Language Processing Application in a Dataset of Patients with Cardiovascular Disease. JMIR Form. Res. 2024, 8, e42774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  37. Duminuco, A.; Au Yeung, J.; Vaghela, R.; Virdee, S.; Woodley, C.; Asirvatham, S.; Curto-Garcia, N.; Sriskandarajah, P.; O’Sullivan, J.; de Lavallade, H.; et al. Development of a natural language processing pipeline for assessment of cardiovascular risk in myeloproliferative neoplasms. Hemasphere 2024, 8, e143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  38. Iglesias, P.; Arias, J.; Lopez, G.; Romero, I.; Diez, J.J. Primary Hyperparathyroidism and Cardiovascular Disease: An Association Study Using Clinical Natural Language Processing Systems and Big Data Analytics. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 6718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  39. Huber, S.L.; Parzer, V.; Ludvik, B.; Pollreisz, A.; Mahnert, N.; Brix, J.M. Evaluation of IDx-DR software for diabetic retinopathy screening in outpatient clinics: Efficacy, safety, and feasibility in a real-world setting. J. Diabetes Complicat. 2025, 39, 109120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  40. Khan, Z.; Gaidhane, A.M.; Singh, M.; Ganesan, S.; Kaur, M.; Sharma, G.C.; Rani, P.; Sharma, R.; Thapliyal, S.; Kushwaha, M.; et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of IDX-DR for Detecting Diabetic Retinopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2025, 273, 192–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  41. Grzybowski, A.; Peeters, F.; Barao, R.C.; Brona, P.; Rommes, S.; Krzywicki, T.; Stalmans, I.; Jacob, J. Evaluating the efficacy of AI systems in diabetic retinopathy detection: A comparative analysis of Mona DR and IDx-DR. Acta Ophthalmol. 2025, 103, 388–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  42. Grzybowski, A.; Brona, P.; Krzywicki, T.; Ruamviboonsuk, P. Diagnostic Accuracy of Automated Diabetic Retinopathy Image Assessment Software: IDx-DR and RetCAD. Ophthalmol. Ther. 2025, 14, 73–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  43. Grzybowski, A.; Rao, D.P.; Brona, P.; Negiloni, K.; Krzywicki, T.; Savoy, F.M. Diagnostic Accuracy of Automated Diabetic Retinopathy Image Assessment Softwares: IDx-DR and Medios Artificial Intelligence. Ophthalmic Res. 2023, 66, 1286–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  44. Grzybowski, A.; Brona, P. Analysis and Comparison of Two Artificial Intelligence Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Algorithms in a Pilot Study: IDx-DR and Retinalyze. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 2352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  45. Savoy, M. IDx-DR for Diabetic Retinopathy Screening. Am. Fam. Physician 2020, 101, 307–308. [Google Scholar]
  46. van der Heijden, A.A.; Abramoff, M.D.; Verbraak, F.; van Hecke, M.V.; Liem, A.; Nijpels, G. Validation of automated screening for referable diabetic retinopathy with the IDx-DR device in the Hoorn Diabetes Care System. Acta Ophthalmol. 2018, 96, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  47. Linardos, A.; Kushibar, K.; Walsh, S.; Gkontra, P.; Lekadir, K. Federated learning for multi-center imaging diagnostics: A simulation study in cardiovascular disease. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 3551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  48. Khan, M.A.; Alsulami, M.; Yaqoob, M.M.; Alsadie, D.; Saudagar, A.K.J.; AlKhathami, M.; Farooq Khattak, U. Asynchronous Federated Learning for Improved Cardiovascular Disease Prediction Using Artificial Intelligence. Diagnostics 2023, 13, 2340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  49. Li, F.; Jin, Y.; Liu, W.; Rawat, B.P.S.; Cai, P.; Yu, H. Fine-Tuning Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT)-Based Models on Large-Scale Electronic Health Record Notes: An Empirical Study. JMIR Med. Inf. 2019, 7, e14830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  50. Lee, P.; Bubeck, S.; Petro, J. Benefits, Limits, and Risks of GPT-4 as an AI Chatbot for Medicine. N. Engl. J. Med. 2023, 388, 1233–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  51. Bhagat, M.I.A.; Wankhede, M.K.G.; Kopawar, M.N.A.; Sananse, P.D.A. Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: A Review. Int. J. Sci. Res. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2024, 11, 133–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  52. Zeb, S.; Fnu, N.; Abbasi, N.; Fahad, M. AI in Healthcare: Revolutionizing Diagnosis and Therapy. Int. J. Multidiscip. Sci. Arts 2024, 3, 118–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  53. Basubrin, O. Current Status and Future of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. Cureus 2025, 17, e77561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  54. Faiyazuddin, M.; Rahman, S.J.Q.; Anand, G.; Siddiqui, R.A.; Mehta, R.; Khatib, M.N.; Gaidhane, S.; Zahiruddin, Q.S.; Hussain, A.; Sah, R. The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Healthcare: A Comprehensive Review of Advancements in Diagnostics, Treatment, and Operational Efficiency. Health Sci. Rep. 2025, 8, e70312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  55. Shah, N.J.; Chen, H. Optimizing Healthcare Delivery: Investigating Key Areas for AI Integration and Impact in Clinical Settings. preprint 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  56. Rana, M.S.; Shuford, J. AI in Healthcare: Transforming Patient Care Through Predictive Analytics and Decision Support Systems. J. Artif. Intell. Gen. Sci. JAIGS 2024, 1, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  57. Secara, I.-A.; Hordiiuk, D. Personalized Health Monitoring Systems: Integrating Wearable and AI. J. Intell. Learn. Syst. Appl. 2024, 16, 44–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Vaidya, R.; Kulkarni, S.; Gaikwad, T.S.; Jadhav, S. Advancing Healthcare Through Artificial Intelligence: Opportunities, Challenges and Future Directions. Int. Res. J. Adv. Engg MGT 2024, 2, 1302–1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  59. Chatterjee, I.; Ghosh, R.; Sarkar, S.; Das, K.; Kundu, M. Revolutionizing Innovations and Impact of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare. Int. J. Multidiscip. Res. 2024, 6, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Abatal, A.; Korchi, A. Transforming Healthcare Systems with Artificial Intelligence: Revolutionizing Efficiency, Quality, and Patient Care. preprint 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  61. Poalelungi, D.G.; Mușat, C.L.; Fulga, A.; Neagu, M.; Neagu, A.I.; Piraianu, A.I.; Fulga, I. Advancing Patient Care: How Artificial Intelligence Is Transforming Healthcare. J. Pers. Med. 2023, 13, 1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  62. Pailaha, A.D. The Impact and Issues of Artificial Intelligence in Nursing Science and Healthcare Settings. Sage Open Nurs. 2023, 9, 23779608231196847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  63. Harry, A. The Future of Medicine: Harnessing the Power of AI for Revolutionizing Healthcare. Int. J. Multidiscip. Sci. Arts 2023, 2, 36–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  64. Al-Suwaidan, F.A. The Security Risks of Artificial Intelligence Applications on the Healthcare System. Saudi J. Health Syst. Res. 2024, 5, 52–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  65. Suryakiran, N. Transforming Healthcare: The Impact and Future of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare. J. Artfic. Intell. Machine. Lear. 2023, 1, 16–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  66. Pham, T.D. Ethical and Legal Considerations in Healthcare AI: Innovation and Policy for Safe and Fair Use. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2025, 12, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  67. Dhawan, S.; Kumar, K. Ethical Implications of AI in Healthcare. Int. J. Sci. Res. Eng. Manag. 2024, 8, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  68. Ramírez, J.G.C. AI in Healthcare: Revolutionizing Patient Care with Predictive Analytics and Decision Support Systems. J. Artif. Intell. Gen. Sci. JAIGS 2024, 1, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  69. Husnain, A.; Rasool, S.; Saeed, A.; Gill, A.Y.; Hussain, H.K. AI’S Healing Touch: Examining Machine Learning’s Transformative Effects on Healthcare. J. World Sci. 2023, 2, 1681–1695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  70. Petersson, L.; Svedberg, P.; Nygren, J.M.; Larsson, I. Healthcare Leaders’ Perceptions of the Usefulness of AI Applications in Clinical Work: A Qualitative Study. In Caring is Sharing—Exploiting the Value in Data for Health and Innovation; IOS Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2023; Volume 302, pp. 678–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  71. Seto, E.; Leonard, K.J.; Cafazzo, J.A.; Barnsley, J.; Masino, C.; Ross, H.J. Developing healthcare rule-based expert systems: Case study of a heart failure telemonitoring system. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2012, 81, 556–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  72. Feeny, A.K.; Chung, M.K.; Madabhushi, A.; Attia, Z.I.; Cikes, M.; Firouznia, M.; Friedman, P.A.; Kalscheur, M.M.; Kapa, S.; Narayan, S.M.; et al. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Arrhythmias and Cardiac Electrophysiology. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol. 2020, 13, e007952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  73. Elvas, L.B.; Gomes, S.; Ferreira, J.C.; Rosario, L.B.; Brandao, T. Deep learning for automatic calcium detection in echocardiography. BioData Min. 2024, 17, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  74. Nanayakkara, T.; Clermont, G.; Langmead, C.J.; Swigon, D. Unifying cardiovascular modelling with deep reinforcement learning for uncertainty aware control of sepsis treatment. PLoS Digit. Health 2022, 1, e0000012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  75. Osztrogonacz, P.; Chinnadurai, P.; Lumsden, A.B. Emerging Applications for Computer Vision and Artificial Intelligence in Management of the Cardiovascular Patient. Methodist. Debakey Cardiovasc. J. 2023, 19, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  76. Huberts, L.C.E.; Li, S.; Blake, V.; Jorm, L.; Yu, J.; Ooi, S.Y.; Gallego, B. Predictive analytics for cardiovascular patient readmission and mortality: An explainable approach. Comput. Biol. Med. 2024, 174, 108321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  77. Dou, W.; Shan, G.; Zhao, Q.; Malhi, M.; Jiang, A.; Zhang, Z.; Gonzalez-Guerra, A.; Fu, S.; Law, J.; Hamilton, R.M.; et al. Robotic manipulation of cardiomyocytes to identify gap junction modifiers for arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy. Sci. Robot. 2024, 9, eadm8233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  78. Cecilio-Fernandes, D.; Sandars, J. The hallucination of learning with generative artificial intelligence. Med. Teach. 2025, 47, 2057–2058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  79. Guliyev, E.I.; Ucok, A. On the ‘Hallucinations’ of Artificial Intelligence and the Hallucination Experience in Human. Turk. Psikiyatr. Derg. 2024, 35, 340–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  80. Jamaluddin, J.; Gaffar, N.A.; Din, N.S.S. Hallucination: A key challenge to Artificial Intelligence-Generated writing. Malays. Fam. Physician 2023, 18, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  81. Aljamaan, F.; Temsah, M.H.; Altamimi, I.; Al-Eyadhy, A.; Jamal, A.; Alhasan, K.; Mesallam, T.A.; Farahat, M.; Malki, K.H. Reference Hallucination Score for Medical Artificial Intelligence Chatbots: Development and Usability Study. JMIR Med. Inform. 2024, 12, e54345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  82. Xie, P.; Wang, H.; Xiao, J.; Xu, F.; Guo, R.; Xie, B.; Li, T.; Ma, R.; Ding, H.; Ma, Y.; et al. Generative AI-powered explainable prediction model: Enhancing early in-hospital mortality alert for patients with acute myocardial infarction. Int. J. Cardiol. 2025, 440, 133649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  83. Liu, X.; Li, S.; Zhu, Q.; Xu, S.; Jin, Q. Interpretable Semi-federated Learning for Multimodal Cardiac Imaging and Risk Stratification: A Privacy-Preserving Framework. J. Imaging Inform. Med. 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  84. Shah, P.; Shukla, M.; Dholakia, N.H.; Gupta, H. Predicting cardiovascular risk with hybrid ensemble learning and explainable AI. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 17927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  85. Zamprogno, G.; Dietz, E.; Heimisch, L.; Russwinkel, N. A hybrid computational approach to anticipate individuals in sequential problem solving. Front. Artif. Intell. 2023, 6, 1223251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  86. Shameer, K.; Johnson, K.W.; Glicksberg, B.S.; Dudley, J.T.; Sengupta, P.P. Machine Learning in Cardiovascular Medicine: Are We There Yet? Heart 2018, 104, 1156–1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  87. Ghosh, S.; Das, S.; Mallipeddi, R. A Deep Learning Framework Integrating the Spectral and Spatial Features for Image-Assisted Medical Diagnostics. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 163686–163696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  88. Lauffenburger, J.C.; Yom-Tov, E.; Keller, P.A.; McDonnell, M.E.; Crum, K.; Bhatkhande, G.; Sears, E.; Hanken, K.; Bessette, L.G.; Fontanet, C.P.; et al. The Impact of Using Reinforcement Learning to Personalize Communication on Medication Adherence: Findings from the REINFORCE Trial. npj Digit. Med. 2024, 7, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  89. Varzideh, F.; Pande, S.; Jankauskas, S.S.; Mone, P.; Kansakar, U.; Santulli, G. Artificial Intelligence in Neurocardiology: Decoding Brain–Heart Network Interactions for Clinical and Translational Insights. Front. Neurosci. 2026, in press. [Google Scholar]
  90. Lauffenburger, J.C.; Yom-Tov, E.; Keller, P.A.; McDonnell, M.E.; Bessette, L.G.; Fontanet, C.P.; Sears, E.; Kim, E.; Hanken, K.; Buckley, J.J.; et al. REinforcement Learning to Improve Non-Adherence for Diabetes Treatments by Optimising Response and Customising Engagement (REINFORCE): Study Protocol of a Pragmatic Randomised Trial. BMJ Open 2021, 11, e052091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  91. Shi, J.; Xiang, M. Using Ghost Convolution YOLO to Detect Brain Tumor. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Computer Applications and Information Systems (ISCAIS 2024); SPIE: Bellingham, Washington, USA, 2024; Volume 132102S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  92. Sivaguru, R.; Saranya, K.; Murugasan, J.; Lakshaga Jyothi, M.; Kiruthika, E. Applications of Artificial Intelligence in the Medical Field: A Survey. Int. Res. J. Adv. Eng. Hub. 2024, 2, 407–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  93. Verma, D. Explainable AI in Healthcare: Interpretable Deep Learning Models for Disease Diagnosis. Pharma Innov. 2019, 8, 561–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  94. Dong, Y. Federated Learning-Based Virtual Dual-Energy CT Generation from Single-Energy CT for Gout Detection. Digit. Health 2025, 11, 20552076251375570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  95. Shajimon, S.; Shukla, R.M.; Patra, A.N. Precision at heart: An IoT-based vertical federated learning approach for heterogeneous data-driven cardiovascular disease risk prediction. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 2026, 273, 109079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  96. Williams, M.C.; MacArthur, J.A.L.; Forsyth, R.; Petersen, S.E. New ways to use imaging data in cardiovascular research: Survey of opinions on federated learning and synthetic data. Eur. Heart J.-Imaging Methods Pract. 2025, 3, qyaf012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  97. Zoller, D.; Haverkamp, C.; Makoudjou, A.; Sofack, G.; Kiefer, S.; Gebele, D.; Pfaffenlehner, M.; Boeker, M.; Binder, H.; Karki, K.; et al. Alpha-1-antitrypsin-deficiency is associated with lower cardiovascular risk: An approach based on federated learning. Respir. Res. 2024, 25, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  98. Nazir, S.; Nawaz, M.; Adnan, A.; Shahzad, S.; Asadi, S. Big Data Features, Applications, and Analytics in Cardiology—A Systematic Literature Review. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 143742–143771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  99. Kruse, C.S.; Goswamy, R.; Raval, Y.; Marawi, S. Challenges and Opportunities of Big Data in Health Care: A Systematic Review. JMIR Med. Inform. 2016, 4, e38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  100. Counseller, Q.; Aboelkassem, Y. Recent Technologies in Cardiac Imaging. Front. Med. Technol. 2023, 4, 984492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  101. Abedi, A.; Verma, A.; Jain, D.; Kaetheeswaran, J.; Chui, C.; Lankarany, M.; Khan, S.S. AI-Driven Real-Time Monitoring of Cardiovascular Conditions with Wearable Devices: Scoping Review. JMIR mHealth uHealth 2025, 13, e73846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  102. Kitagaki, K.; Hongo, Y.; Futai, R.; Hasegawa, T.; Morikawa, H.; Shimoyama, H. Validity of Heart Rate Measurement Using Wearable Devices During Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease: Prospective Pilot Validation Study. JMIR Cardio 2025, 9, e77911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  103. Seffah, K.; Zaman, M.A.; Awais, N.; Satnarine, T.; Haq, A.; Hernandez, G.N.; Khan, S. Correction: Exploring the Role of Wearable Electronic Medical Devices in Improving Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Outcomes Among Adults: A Systematic Review. Cureus 2025, 17, c312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  104. Gaoudam, N.; Sakhamudi, S.K.; Kamal, B.; Addla, N.; Reddy, E.P.; Ambala, M.; Lavanya, K.; Palaparthi, E.C.; Bhattam, A.; Periasamy, P.; et al. Wearable Devices and AI-Driven Remote Monitoring in Cardiovascular Medicine: A Narrative Review. Cureus 2025, 17, e90208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  105. Lu, J.K.; Wang, W.; Goh, J.; Maier, A.B. Selecting Wearable Devices to Measure Cardiovascular Functions in Community-Dwelling Adults: Application of a Practical Guide for Device Selection. Mayo Clin. Proc. Digit. Health 2025, 3, 100202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  106. Ahmad, O.M.; Ibrahim, R.; Odunsi, D.I.; Mohammed, M.; Mathew, B.G.; Touny, M.; Grewal, B.S.; Bhanot, S.; Bodapati, N.; Thomas, G.P.; et al. Role of Mobile Health and Wearable Devices in Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: A Comprehensive Review. Cureus 2025, 17, e83673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  107. Terada, T.; Hausen, M.; Way, K.L.; O’Neill, C.D.; Marcal, I.R.; Dorian, P.; Reed, J.L. Wearable Devices for Exercise Prescription and Physical Activity Monitoring in Patients with Various Cardiovascular Conditions. CJC Open 2025, 7, 695–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  108. Chauhan, G.K.; Vavken, P.; Jacob, C. Mobile Apps and Wearable Devices for Cardiovascular Health: Narrative Review. JMIR mHealth uHealth 2025, 13, e65782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  109. Zheng, X.; Liu, Z.; Liu, J.; Hu, C.; Du, Y.; Li, J.; Pan, Z.; Ding, K. Advancing Sports Cardiology: Integrating Artificial Intelligence with Wearable Devices for Cardiovascular Health Management. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2025, 17, 17895–17920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  110. Singh, J.; Ellingson, C.J.; Gagarinova, M.; Thakkar, R.; Mehta, N.; Ahmad, K.; Sultana, S.; Bhat, S.; Dehghani, P. Wearable Devices for Hemodynamic Assessment in Cardiovascular Disease: A Short Literature Review. Cardiol. Rev. 2025, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  111. Ballavenuto, J.M.A.; Tongtip, N.; Fischer, N.L.S.; Bardus, M. Wearable devices, ischemic heart disease and cardiovascular outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Maturitas 2025, 193, 108186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  112. Iqbal, S.M.A.; Leavitt, M.A.; Mahgoub, I.; Asghar, W. Advances in Cardiovascular Wearable Devices. Biosensors 2024, 14, 525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  113. Dhingra, L.S.; Aminorroaya, A.; Oikonomou, E.K.; Nargesi, A.A.; Wilson, F.P.; Krumholz, H.M.; Khera, R. Use of Wearable Devices in Individuals with or at Risk for Cardiovascular Disease in the US, 2019 to 2020. JAMA Netw. Open 2023, 6, e2316634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  114. Park, U.; Miyagi, M.; Wu, X.; Ito, M.; Chikai, M.; Sakai, F.; Miura, T.; Sato, H.; Murai, A.; Freeman, S.; et al. Digitalization of Comprehensive Geriatric Assessments for Nursing Practice: A Feasibility and Proof-of-Concept Study Toward Nursing Home Implementation. Healthcare 2026, 14, 528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  115. Hughes, A.; Shandhi, M.M.H.; Master, H.; Dunn, J.; Brittain, E. Wearable Devices in Cardiovascular Medicine. Circ. Res. 2023, 132, 652–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  116. Alam, S.; Zhang, M.; Harris, K.; Fletcher, L.M.; Reneker, J.C. The Impact of Consumer Wearable Devices on Physical Activity and Adherence to Physical Activity in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Telemed. J. e-Health 2023, 29, 986–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  117. Gehr, S.; Russmann, C. Shaping the future of cardiovascular medicine in the new era of wearable devices. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2022, 19, 501–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  118. Lee, S.; Chu, Y.; Ryu, J.; Park, Y.J.; Yang, S.; Koh, S.B. Artificial Intelligence for Detection of Cardiovascular-Related Diseases from Wearable Devices: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Yonsei Med. J. 2022, 63, S93–S107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  119. Chen, E.; Jiang, J.; Zhou, J.; Wang, H.; Sun, G.; Zhou, R.; Su, R.; Zhu, S.; Huo, Y. Cardiovascular Disease Risk Stratification in Wrist Wearable Devices and e-Health App Users: A Large-Scale Retrospective Study. Telemed. J. E Health 2022, 28, 1151–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  120. Tan, L.; Yu, K.; Bashir, A.K.; Cheng, X.; Ming, F.; Zhao, L.; Zhou, X. Toward real-time and efficient cardiovascular monitoring for COVID-19 patients by 5G-enabled wearable medical devices: A deep learning approach. Neural Comput. Appl. 2023, 35, 13921–13934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  121. Bayoumy, K.; Gaber, M.; Elshafeey, A.; Mhaimeed, O.; Dineen, E.H.; Marvel, F.A.; Martin, S.S.; Muse, E.D.; Turakhia, M.P.; Tarakji, K.G.; et al. Smart wearable devices in cardiovascular care: Where we are and how to move forward. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2021, 18, 581–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  122. Mizuno, A.; Changolkar, S.; Patel, M.S. Wearable Devices to Monitor and Reduce the Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: Evidence and Opportunities. Annu. Rev. Med. 2021, 72, 459–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  123. Wang, R.; Mu, L.; Bao, Y.; Lin, H.; Ji, T.; Shi, Y.; Zhu, J.; Wu, W. Holistically Engineered Polymer-Polymer and Polymer-Ion Interactions in Biocompatible Polyvinyl Alcohol Blends for High-Performance Triboelectric Devices in Self-Powered Wearable Cardiovascular Monitorings. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, e2002878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  124. Yingling, L.R.; Mitchell, V.; Ayers, C.R.; Peters-Lawrence, M.; Wallen, G.R.; Brooks, A.T.; Troendle, J.F.; Adu-Brimpong, J.; Thomas, S.; Henry, J.; et al. Adherence with physical activity monitoring wearable devices in a community-based population: Observations from the Washington, D.C., Cardiovascular Health and Needs Assessment. Transl. Behav. Med. 2017, 7, 719–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  125. Velmahos, C.S.; Paschalidis, A.; Paranjape, C. The Not-So-Distant Future or Just Hype? Utilizing Machine Learning to Predict 30-Day Post-Operative Complications in Laparoscopic Colectomy Patients. Am. Surg. 2023, 89, 5648–5654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  126. Orellana, C.F.V.; Dávila, M.F.V. Current Status and Challenges of IoT Research in the Ecuadorian Healthcare Sector: A Systematic Literature Review. Enfoque UTE 2024, 15, 20–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  127. Yun, S.; Enjuanes, C.; Calero, E.; Hidalgo, E.; Marcos, M.C.; Llàcer, P.; García-Pinilla, J.M.; Franco, Á.G.; Núñez, J.; Morales-Rull, J.L.; et al. Study Design of Heart Failure Events Reduction with Remote Monitoring and eHealth Support (HERMeS). Esc. Heart Fail. 2020, 7, 4448–4457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  128. Pinto, N.M.; Patel, A.; Delaney, R.K.; Donofrio, M.T.; Marino, B.S.; Miller, S.G.; Ozanne, E.M.; Zickmund, S.; Karasawa, M.; Pershing, M.L.; et al. Provider Insights on Shared Decision-Making with Families Affected by CHD. Cardiol. Young 2021, 32, 1475–1482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  129. Hoodbhoy, Z.; Jeelani, S.M.; Aziz, A.; Habib, M.I.; Iqbal, B.; Akmal, W.; Siddiqui, K.; Hasan, B.; Leeflang, M.; Das, J.K. Machine Learning for Child and Adolescent Health: A Systematic Review. Pediatrics 2020, 147, e2020011833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  130. Kirkham, E.; Crompton, C.J.; Iveson, M.H.; Beange, I.; McIntosh, A.M.; Fletcher-Watson, S. Co-Development of a Best Practice Checklist for Mental Health Data Science: A Delphi Study. Front. Psychiatry 2021, 12, 643914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  131. Cimminiello, C.; Dondi, L.; Pedrini, A.; Ronconi, G.; Calabria, S.; Piccinni, C.; Friz, H.P.; Martini, N.; Maggioni, A.P. Patterns of Treatment with Antiplatelet Therapy After an Acute Coronary Syndrome: Data from a Large Database in a Community Setting. Eur. J. Prev. Cardiol. 2018, 26, 836–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  132. Portalis, M.R.; Cymberknop, L.J.; Farro, I.; Armentano, R.L. Computational Clustering Reveals Differentiated Coronary Artery Calcium Progression at Prevalent Levels of Pulse Wave Velocity by Classifying High-Risk Patients. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2023, 10, 1161914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  133. Silversides, C.K. Echocardiography in the Era of Artificial Intelligence. JACC Adv. 2023, 2, 100574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  134. Tseng, A.S.; Lopez-Jimenez, F.; Pellikka, P.A. Future Guidelines for Artificial Intelligence in Echocardiography. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2022, 35, 878–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  135. Moon, I.; Lee, J.; Lee, S.A.; Jeong, D.; Jeon, J.; Jang, Y.; Jeong, S.; Kim, J.; Choi, H.M.; Hwang, I.C.; et al. Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Analysis of Echocardiography-Based Radiomic Features for Myocardial Hypertrophy Detection and Etiology Differentiation. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2025, 18, e017436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  136. Aromiwura, A.A.; Settle, T.; Umer, M.; Joshi, J.; Shotwell, M.; Mattumpuram, J.; Vorla, M.; Sztukowska, M.; Contractor, S.; Amini, A.; et al. Artificial intelligence in cardiac computed tomography. Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2023, 81, 54–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  137. Infante, T.; Cavaliere, C.; Punzo, B.; Grimaldi, V.; Salvatore, M.; Napoli, C. Radiogenomics and Artificial Intelligence Approaches Applied to Cardiac Computed Tomography Angiography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance for Precision Medicine in Coronary Heart Disease: A Systematic Review. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2021, 14, 1133–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  138. Shatla, I.; Hulten, E.A. Has artificial intelligence proven stress perfusion cardiac computed tomography obsolete or more relevant than ever? Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2025, 26, 1150–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  139. Cirillo, C.; Matarrese, M.A.G.; Monda, E.; Pagnano, M.E.; Vitale, J.; Verrillo, F.; Palmiero, G.; Bassolino, S.; Buono, P.; Caiazza, M.; et al. Artificial intelligence for left ventricular hypertrophy detection and differentiation on echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance and cardiac computed tomography: A systematic review. Int. J. Cardiol. 2025, 422, 132979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  140. Abu Suleiman, A.; Russo, F.; Della Valle, L.; Ausiello, D.; Bukowska-Olech, E.; Iannibelli, V.; Al Droubi, M.O.; Sannino, G.; Bernardi, M.; Spadafora, L. Cardiac Computed Tomography for the Assessment of Myocardial Bridging: A Scoping Review of the Emerging Role of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning. J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2025, 12, 350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  141. Moignier, A.; Perennec, T.; Prangeres, E.; Bernard, B.; Botticella, A.; Chen, X.; Finnegan, R.; Huger, S.; Karlhede, A.; Lacornerie, T.; et al. Comparative analysis of artificial intelligence-based contouring of cardiac substructures on computed tomography scans for radiation therapy. Phys. Imaging Radiat. Oncol. 2026, 38, 100935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  142. Chao, M.F.; Jacob, A.J.; Sinha, A.; Hallam, K.; Kragholm, K.H.; Sharma, P.; Rapaka, S.; Ramirez-Giraldo, J.C.; Chang, S.M. Artificial intelligence-based bi-ventricular systolic and diastolic volume, ejection fraction using non-contrast ECG-gated cardiac computed tomography. Eur. Heart J.-Imaging Methods Pract. 2025, 3, qyaf121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  143. Hamelink, I.I.; Nie, Z.Z.; Severijn, T.; van Tuinen, M.M.; van Ooijen, P.; Kwee, T.C.T.; Dorrius, M.D.M.; van der Harst, P.P.; Vliegenthart, R.R. Validation of artificial intelligence software for automatic calcium scoring in cardiac and chest computed tomography. Eur. J. Radiol. 2025, 191, 112323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  144. Luo, C.; Mo, L.; Zeng, Z.; Jiang, M.; Chen, B.T. Artificial intelligence-assisted measurements of coronary computed tomography angiography parameters such as stenosis, flow reserve, and fat attenuation for predicting major adverse cardiac events in patients with coronary arterial disease. Biomol. Biomed. 2024, 24, 1407–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  145. Lin, Y.; Lin, G.; Peng, M.T.; Kuo, C.T.; Wan, Y.L.; Cherng, W.J. The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Coronary Calcium Scoring in Standard Cardiac Computed Tomography and Chest Computed Tomography with Different Reconstruction Kernels. J. Thorac. Imaging 2024, 39, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  146. Bui, V.; Hsu, L.Y.; Chang, L.C.; Sun, A.Y.; Tran, L.; Shanbhag, S.M.; Zhou, W.; Mehta, N.N.; Chen, M.Y. DeepHeartCT: A fully automatic artificial intelligence hybrid framework based on convolutional neural network and multi-atlas segmentation for multi-structure cardiac computed tomography angiography image segmentation. Front. Artif. Intell. 2022, 5, 1059007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  147. Nicol, E.D.; Weir-McCall, J.R.; Shaw, L.J.; Williamson, E. Great debates in cardiac computed tomography: OPINION: “Artificial intelligence and the future of cardiovascular CT—Managing expectation and challenging hype”. J. Cardiovasc. Comput. Tomogr. 2023, 17, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  148. Motwani, M.; Williams, M.C.; Nieman, K.; Choi, A.D. Great debates in cardiac computed tomography: OPINION: “Artificial intelligence is key to the future of CCTA—The great hope”. J. Cardiovasc. Comput. Tomogr. 2023, 17, 18–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  149. Miller, R.J.H.; Singh, A.; Dey, D.; Slomka, P. Artificial Intelligence and Cardiac PET/Computed Tomography Imaging. PET Clin. 2022, 17, 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  150. Wang, Y.J.; Yang, K.; Wen, Y.; Wang, P.; Hu, Y.; Lai, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, K.; Tang, S.; Zhang, A.; et al. Screening and diagnosis of cardiovascular disease using artificial intelligence-enabled cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Nat. Med. 2024, 30, 1471–1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  151. Sveric, K.M.; Ulbrich, S.; Dindane, Z.; Winkler, A.; Botan, R.; Mierke, J.; Trausch, A.; Heidrich, F.; Linke, A. Improved assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction using artificial intelligence in echocardiography: A comparative analysis with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Int. J. Cardiol. 2024, 394, 131383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  152. Asif, A.; Charters, P.F.P.; Thompson, C.A.S.; Komber, H.; Hudson, B.J.; Rodrigues, J.C.L. Artificial intelligence can detect left ventricular dilatation on contrast-enhanced thoracic computer tomography relative to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Br. J. Radiol. 2022, 95, 20210852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  153. Jathanna, N.; Podlasek, A.; Sokol, A.; Auer, D.; Chen, X.; Jamil-Copley, S. Diagnostic utility of artificial intelligence for left ventricular scar identification using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging-A systematic review. Cardiovasc. Digit. Health J. 2021, 2, S21–S29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  154. Saad, H.; Ammann, C.; Hadler, T.; Bhoyroo, Y.; Reisdorf, P.; Veit, J.; Chitiboi, T.; Wetzl, J.; Geppert, C.; Schulz-Menger, J. Assessing the robustness of an artificial intelligence segmentation model for quantitative cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging across cardiac phenotypes. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2026, 42, 343–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  155. Fu, L.; Zhang, P.; Cheng, L.; Zhi, P.; Xu, J.; Liu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, Z.; He, K. An Innovative Artificial Intelligence Classification Model for Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Utilizing Cardiac Biomechanics Derived from Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Bioengineering 2025, 12, 670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  156. Hsia, B.C.; Lai, A.; Singh, S.; Samtani, R.; Bienstock, S.; Liao, S.; Stern, E.; LaRocca, G.; Sanz, J.; Lerakis, S.; et al. Validation of American Society of Echocardiography Guideline-Recommended Parameters of Right Ventricular Dysfunction Using Artificial Intelligence Compared with Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2023, 36, 967–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  157. Geng, Z.; Chen, B.; Li, Q.; Han, X.; Zhu, X. Efficacy of Morphine Combined with Mechanical Ventilation in the Treatment of Heart Failure with Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging under Artificial Intelligence Algorithms. Contrast Media Mol. Imaging 2022, 2022, 1732915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  158. Cau, R.; Cherchi, V.; Micheletti, G.; Porcu, M.; Mannelli, L.; Bassareo, P.; Suri, J.S.; Saba, L. Potential Role of Artificial Intelligence in Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Can It Help Clinicians in Making a Diagnosis? J. Thorac. Imaging 2021, 36, 142–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  159. Yuan, W.F.; Zhao, X.X.; Hu, F.B.; Bai, C.; Tang, F. Evaluation of Early Gadolinium Enhancement (EGE) and Cardiac Functional Parameters in Cine-Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) on Artificial Intelligence in Patients with Acute Myocarditis: A Case-Controlled Observational Study. Med. Sci. Monit. 2019, 25, 5493–5500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  160. Kersting, D.; Rischpler, C.; Seifert, R. I see, therefore I am? The value of artificial intelligence in nuclear imaging-based identification of cardiac amyloidosis. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 2024, 33, 101773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  161. Di Carli, M.F. Artificial Intelligence Lifts the Fog in SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging with Some Shadows Remaining. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 2025, 18, 1247–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  162. Otaki, Y.; Singh, A.; Kavanagh, P.; Miller, R.J.H.; Parekh, T.; Tamarappoo, B.K.; Sharir, T.; Einstein, A.J.; Fish, M.B.; Ruddy, T.D.; et al. Clinical Deployment of Explainable Artificial Intelligence of SPECT for Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 2022, 15, 1091–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  163. Hajianfar, G.; Gharibi, O.; Sabouri, M.; Mohebi, M.; Amini, M.; Yasemi, M.J.; Chehreghani, M.; Maghsudi, M.; Mansouri, Z.; Edalat-Javid, M.; et al. Artificial intelligence-powered coronary artery disease diagnosis from SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging: A comprehensive deep learning study. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2025, 52, 3019–3035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  164. Garcia, E.V.; Klein, J.L.; Moncayo, V.; Cooke, C.D.; Del’Aune, C.; Folks, R.; Moreiras, L.V.; Esteves, F. Diagnostic performance of an artificial intelligence-driven cardiac-structured reporting system for myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 2020, 27, 1652–1664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  165. Balaji, V.; Song, T.A.; Malekzadeh, M.; Heidari, P.; Dutta, J. Artificial Intelligence for PET and SPECT Image Enhancement. J. Nucl. Med. 2024, 65, 4–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  166. Slart, R.; Williams, M.C.; Juarez-Orozco, L.E.; Rischpler, C.; Dweck, M.R.; Glaudemans, A.; Gimelli, A.; Georgoulias, P.; Gheysens, O.; Gaemperli, O.; et al. Position paper of the EACVI and EANM on artificial intelligence applications in multimodality cardiovascular imaging using SPECT/CT, PET/CT, and cardiac CT. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2021, 48, 1399–1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  167. Panayides, A.S.; Amini, A.; Filipovic, N.D.; Sharma, A.; Tsaftaris, S.A.; Young, A.; Foran, D.; Do, N.; Golemati, S.; Kurc, T.; et al. AI in Medical Imaging Informatics: Current Challenges and Future Directions. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inf. 2020, 24, 1837–1857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  168. Gao, Y.; Dong, K.; Gao, Y.; Jin, X.; Yang, J.; Yan, G.; Liu, Q. Unified cross-modality integration and analysis of T cell receptors and T cell transcriptomes by low-resource-aware representation learning. Cell Genom. 2024, 4, 100553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  169. Amal, S.; Sawyer, D.; Konik, A. Editorial: Artificial intelligence and multimodal medical imaging data fusion for improving cardiovascular disease care. Front. Radiol. 2024, 4, 1412404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  170. Shiokawa, N.; Izumo, M.; Shimamura, T.; Kurosaka, Y.; Satô, Y.; Okamura, T.; Akashi, Y.J. Accuracy and Efficacy of Artificial Intelligence-Derived Automatic Measurements of Transthoracic Echocardiography in Routine Clinical Practice. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 1861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  171. Zamzmi, G.; Hsu, L.Y.; Rajaraman, S.; Li, W.; Sachdev, V.; Antani, S. Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence-Based System for Echocardiographic Estimation of Right Atrial Pressure. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2023, 39, 2437–2450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  172. Naser, N.; Stanković, I.; Nešković, A. The Reliability of Automated Three-Dimensional Echocardiography-HeartModelA.I. Versus 2D Echocardiography Simpson Methods in Evaluation of Left Ventricle Volumes and Ejection Fraction in Patients with Left Ventricular Dysfunction. Med. Arch. 2022, 76, 259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  173. Bisignani, G.; Volpe, L.; Madeo, A.; Vico, R.; Bencardino, D.; Bonis, S.D. AI-Assisted LVEF Assessment Using a Handheld Ultrasound Device: A Single-Center Comparative Study Against Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 4708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  174. Karužas, A.; Balčiūnas, J.; Fukson, M.; Verikas, D.; Matuliauskas, D.; Platūkis, T.; Vaičiulienė, D.; Jurgaitytė, J.; Kupstytė-Krištaponė, N.; Dirsienė, R.; et al. Artificial Intelligence for Automated Evaluation of Aortic Measurements in 2D Echocardiography: Feasibility, Accuracy, and Reproducibility. Echocardiography 2022, 39, 1439–1445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  175. Salehi, M.; Alabed, S.; Sharkey, M.; Maiter, A.; Dwivedi, K.; Yardibi, T.; Selej, M.; Hameed, A.; Charalampopoulos, A.; Kiely, D.G.; et al. Artificial Intelligence-Based Echocardiography Assessment to Detect Pulmonary Hypertension. ERJ Open Res. 2024, 11, 00592–02024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  176. Kusunose, K. Transforming Echocardiography: The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Enhancing Diagnostic Accuracy and Accessibility. Intern. Med. 2025, 64, 331–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  177. Chen, W.; Wu, J.; Zhang, Z.; Gao, Z.; Chen, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, L.; Tang, Z.; Yu, W.; Fan, S.-m.; et al. Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Echocardiographic Monitoring in Pediatric Patients on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2024, 11, 1418741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  178. Ono, S.; Komatsu, M.; Sakai, A.; Arima, H.; Ochida, M.; Aoyama, R.; Yasutomi, S.; Asada, K.; Kaneko, S.; Sasano, T.; et al. Automated Endocardial Border Detection and Left Ventricular Functional Assessment in Echocardiography Using Deep Learning. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  179. Rajagopal, S.; Bogaard, H.J.; Elbaz, M.S.; Freed, B.H.; Rémy-Jardin, M.; Beek, E.J.v.; Gopalan, D.; Kiely, D.G. Emerging Multimodality Imaging Techniques for the Pulmonary Circulation. Eur. Respir. J. 2024, 64, 2401128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  180. Hirata, Y.; Kusunose, K. AI in Echocardiography: State-of-the-Art Automated Measurement Techniques and Clinical Applications. JMA J. 2025, 8, 141–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  181. Abazid, R.M.; Abohamr, S.I.; Smettei, O.A.; Qasem, M.; Suresh, A.; Harb, M.F.A.; Aljaber, A.N.; Motairy, A.A.; Albiela, D.; Almutairi, B.M.; et al. Visual Versus Fully Automated Assessment of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction. Avicenna J. Med. 2018, 8, 41–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  182. Zadeh, S.N.; Malagutti, P.; Sartore, L.; Madhkour, R.; Berto, M.B.; Gräni, C.; Marchi, S.F.d. Prognostic Value of Advanced Echocardiography in Patients with Ischemic Heart Disease: A Comprehensive Review. Echocardiography 2024, 42, e70065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  183. Wood, P.W.; Gibson, P.H.; Becher, H. Three-Dimensional Echocardiography in a Dynamic Heart Phantom: Comparison of Five Different Methods to Measure Chamber Volume Using a Commercially Available Software. Echo Res. Pract. 2014, 1, 51–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  184. Grue, J.F.; Storve, S.; Dalen, H.; Salvesen, Ø.; Mjølstad, O.C.; Samstad, S.; Torp, H.; Haugen, B.O. Automatic Measurements of Mitral Annular Plane Systolic Excursion and Velocities to Detect Left Ventricular Dysfunction. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2018, 44, 168–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  185. Suehiro, K.; Tanaka, K.; Yamada, T.; Matsuura, T.; Funao, T.; Mori, T.; Nishikawa, K. The Utility of Intra-Operative Three-Dimensional Transoesophageal Echocardiography for Dynamic Measurement of Stroke Volume. Anaesthesia 2014, 70, 150–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  186. Kadoglou, N.P.E.; Khattab, E.; Velidakis, N.; Gkougkoudi, E.; Myrianthefs, M.M. The Role of Echocardiography in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Pulmonary Hypertension. J. Pers. Med. 2024, 14, 474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  187. Bourazana, A.; Xanthopoulos, A.; Briasoulis, A.; Magouliotis, D.E.; Spiliopoulos, K.; Athanasiou, T.; Vassilopoulos, G.; Skoularigis, J.; Triposkiadis, F. Artificial Intelligence in Heart Failure: Friend or Foe? Life 2024, 14, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  188. Li, H.; Chen, Z.; Kahn, A.M.; Kligerman, S.; Narayan, H.K.; Contijoch, F. Deep Learning Automates Detection of Wall Motion Abnormalities via Measurement of Longitudinal Strain from ECG-gated CT Images. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2022, 9, 1009445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  189. Meel, R.; Peters, F.; Libhaber, E.; Nethononda, R. Comparison of Chronic Rheumatic Mitral Regurgitation Severity Between Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Echocardiography. Wits J. Clin. Med. 2023, 5, 155–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  190. Sakamoto, A.; Kagiyama, N.; Sato, E.; Nakamura, Y.; Murata, A.; Kaneko, T.; Miyazaki, S.; Ashikawa, Y.; Sugihara, K.; Minamino, T. Artificial Intelligence-Based Automated Echocardiographic Analysis and the Workflow of Sonographers: A Randomized Crossover Trial (AI-Echo RCT). J Am Heart Assoc. 2026, 15, e045637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  191. Maeder, M.T.; Karapanagiotidis, S.; Dewar, E.; Kaye, D.M. Accuracy of Echocardiographic Cardiac Index Assessment in Subjects with Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction. Echocardiography 2015, 32, 1628–1638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  192. Nedadur, R.; Wang, B.; Tsang, W. Artificial Intelligence for the Echocardiographic Assessment of Valvular Heart Disease. Heart 2022, 108, 1592–1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  193. Kim, S.-A.; Lee, K.H.; Won, H.-Y.; Park, S.; Chung, J.H.; Jang, Y.; Ha, J.W. Quantitative Assessment of Aortic Elasticity with Aging Using Velocity-Vector Imaging and Its Histologic Correlation. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2013, 33, 1306–1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  194. Sunyecz, I.L.; McCallinhart, P.E.; Patel, K.U.; McDermott, M.; Trask, A.J. Defining Coronary Flow Patterns: Comprehensive Automation of Transthoracic Doppler Coronary Blood Flow. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 17268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  195. Dahal, L.; Kafle, A.; Khanal, B. Uncertainty Estimation in Deep 2D Echocardiography Segmentation. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2005.09349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  196. Leeson, P.; Fletcher, A.J. Combining Artificial Intelligence with Human Insight to Automate Echocardiography. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2019, 12, e009727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  197. Nargesi, A.A.; Adejumo, P.; Dhingra, L.S.; Rosand, B.; Hengartner, A.; Coppi, A.; Benigeri, S.; Sen, S.; Ahmad, T.; Nadkarni, G.N.; et al. Automated Identification of Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction Using Deep Learning-Based Natural Language Processing. JACC Heart Fail. 2025, 13, 75–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  198. Cersosimo, A.; Zito, E.; Pierucci, N.; Matteucci, A.; Fazia, V.M.L. A Talk with ChatGPT: The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Shaping the Future of Cardiology and Electrophysiology. J. Pers. Med. 2025, 15, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  199. Menezes Junior, A.D.S.; e Silva, A.L.F.; e Silva, L.R.F.; de Lima, K.B.A.; Oliveira, H.L.D. A Scoping Review of the Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Identification and Diagnosis of Atrial Fibrillation. J. Pers. Med. 2024, 14, 1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  200. Dadon, Z.; Rav, M.; Orlev, A.; Carasso, S.; Glikson, M.; Gottlieb, S.; Alpert, E.A. Artificial Intelligence-Based Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction by Medical Students for Mortality and Readmission Prediction. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  201. Salvi, M.; Acharya, M.R.; Seoni, S.; Faust, O.; Tan, R.S.; Barua, P.D.; García, S.; Molinari, F.; Acharya, U.R. Artificial Intelligence for Atrial Fibrillation Detection, Prediction, and Treatment: A Systematic Review of the Last Decade (2013–2023). Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 2024, 14, e1530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  202. Dujardin, K.; Vander Heyde, L.; Carlier, S.; Bertrand, P.; Koopman, P.; Nedoszytko, M.; Casado-Arroyo, R.; De Jaeger, P. Belgian position paper on implementing artificial intelligence in cardiology: A roadmap from theory to clinical practice. Acta Cardiol. 2026, 81, 12–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  203. Santala, O.E.; Lipponen, J.A.; Jäntti, H.; Rissanen, T.T.; Tarvainen, M.P.; Laitinen, T.; Laitinen, T.M.; Castrén, M.; Väliaho, E.S.; Rantula, O.A.; et al. Continuous mHealth Patch Monitoring for the Algorithm-Based Detection of Atrial Fibrillation: Feasibility and Diagnostic Accuracy Study. JMIR Cardio 2022, 6, e31230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  204. Akbilgiç, O.; Butler, L.; Karabayir, İ.m.; Chang, P.P.; Kitzman, D.W.; Alonso, Á.; Chen, L.Y.; Soliman, E.Z. ECG-AI: Electrocardiographic Artificial Intelligence Model for Prediction of Heart Failure. Eur. Heart J.-Digit. Health 2021, 2, 626–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  205. Nolin-Lapalme, A.; Sowa, A.; Delfrate, J.; Tastet, O.; Corbin, D.; Kulbay, M.; Ozdemir, D.; Noel, M.A.; Marois-Blanchet, F.-C.; Harvey, F.; et al. Foundation Models for Generalizable Electrocardiogram Interpretation: Comparison of Supervised and Self-Supervised Electrocardiogram Foundation Models. medRxiv 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  206. Sekhar, K.; Priyadarsini, K.; Jebamony, J.S. Efficient Detection of Cardiac Arrhythmias Using Low-Latency Fpga-Accelerated Hybrid Deep Learning Models. Eng. Res. Express 2025, 7, 025277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  207. Redka, I.V. Modern Approaches to Detecting and Removing Artifacts from EEG Signals. Overview. Klin. Inform. Telemed. 2019, 14, 13–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  208. Lü, L.; Zhu, T.; Ribeiro, A.H.; Clifton, L.; Zhao, E.; Ribeiro, A.L.P.; Zhang, Y.T.; Clifton, D.A. Knowledge Discovery with Electrocardiography Using Interpretable Deep Neural Networks. medRxiv 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  209. Revuri, N. Investigating the Efficacy of AI-Powered Innovations in ECG Analysis and Continuous Heart Monitoring: A Comprehensive Narrative Review. Cureus 2025, 17, e89743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  210. Foti, R.; Silvestro, M.; Campisi, G.; Conti, S.; Picciolo, G.; Cardi, C.; Barbanti, M.; Rapisarda, G.; Parlavecchio, A.; Sgarito, G. Continuous Monitoring with Implantable Loop Recorders After Cryoballoon Ablation: Impact on Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence and Therapeutic Management in Era of Artificial Intelligence. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 2932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  211. Iftikhar, H. AI-Driven Pharmacovigilance and Molecular Profiling of Fluoroquinolone-Associated Cardiotoxicity in the UAE: A Geospatial and Machine Learning Analysis with Structural Modification Strategies (2018–2023). medRxiv 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  212. Gupta, V. From Traditional to Modern: A Narrative Review of AI-Based Approaches of Cardiac Arrhythmia Diagnosis. Turk. J. Intern. Med. 2025, 7, 90–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  213. Matsuzawa, Y.; Svedlund, S.; Aoki, T.; Guddeti, R.; Kwon, T.G.; Cilluffo, R.; Widmer, R.J.; Nelson, R.E.; Lennon, R.J.; Lerman, L.O.; et al. Utility of Both Carotid Intima–media Thickness and Endothelial Function for Cardiovascular Risk Stratification in Patients with Angina-Like Symptoms. Int. J. Cardiol. 2015, 190, 90–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  214. Agrawal, N.; Kumar, A.; Kumar, A.; Singh, H.K. Cardiovascular Disease Risk Assessment in a Rural Population (≫40 Years). Int. J. Health Sci. 2022, 6, 12250–12258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  215. Hacıağaoğlu, N.; Çetin, H.; Hürmeydan, Ö.; Şimşek, E.E. Predictive Value of Betatrophin for Determining the Cardiovascular Risks of Obese Individuals. J. Coll. Physicians Surg. Pak. 2021, 31, 177–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  216. García-Martín, E.; Gopegui, E.R.; León-Latre, M.; Otín, S.; Altemir, I.; Polo, V.; Poves, J.M.L.; Ciprés, M.; Casasnovas, J.A.; Pablo, L.E. Influence of Cardiovascular Condition on Retinal and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Measurements. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0189929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  217. Kamel, P.; Yi, P.H.; Sair, H.I.; Lin, C.T. Prediction of Coronary Artery Calcium and Cardiovascular Risk on Chest Radiographs Using Deep Learning. Radiol. Cardiothorac. Imaging 2021, 3, e200486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  218. Quesada, J.A.; López-Pineda, A.; Gil-Guillén, V.; Durazo-Arvizu, R.; Orozco-Beltrán, D.; López-Domenech, A.; Carratalá-Munuera, C. Machine Learning to Predict Cardiovascular Risk. Int. J. Clin. Pract. 2019, 73, e13389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  219. Wallisch, C.; Agibetov, A.; Dunkler, D.; Haller, M.; Samwald, M.; Dorffner, G.; Heinze, G. The Roles of Predictors in Cardiovascular Risk Models—A Question of Modeling Culture? BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2021, 21, 284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  220. Jordan, K.P.; Rathod-Mistry, T.; Windt, D.v.d.; Bailey, J.; Chen, Y.; Clarson, L.; Denaxas, S.; Hayward, R.; Hemingway, H.; Kyriacou, T.; et al. Determining Cardiovascular Risk in Patients with Unattributed Chest Pain in UK Primary Care: An Electronic Health Record Study. Eur. J. Prev. Cardiol. 2023, 30, 1151–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  221. Ghorpade, A.G.; Shrivastava, S.R.; Kar, S.S.; Sarkar, S.; Majgi, S.M.; Roy, G. Estimation of the Cardiovascular Risk Using World Health Organization/International Society of Hypertension (WHO/ISH) Risk Prediction Charts in a Rural Population of South India. Int. J. Health Policy Manag. 2015, 4, 531–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  222. Varzideh, F.; Mone, P.; Kansakar, U.; Pande, S.; Jankauskas, S.S.; Santulli, G. Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Medicine: Focus on Hypertension. Hypertension 2026, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  223. Karnik, A.; Yang, E. Artificial Intelligence to Improve Blood Pressure Control: A State-of-the-Art Review. Am. J. Hypertens. 2025, 38, 519–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  224. Girón, N.; Lim, C.; Vallini, J.; Hallar, K. Moving Toward Improved Access to Medicines and Health Technologies for Cardiovascular Disease. Rev. Panam. Salud Pública 2023, 47, e93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  225. Psounis, K.; Andreadis, E.A.; Oikonomaki, T.; Roumeliotis, S.; Margellos, V.; Thodis, E.; Passadakis, P.; Panagoutsos, S. The Prognostic Role of Automated Office Blood Pressure Measurement in Hypertensive Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease. Healthcare 2023, 11, 1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  226. Myers, M.G.; Godwin, M.; Dawes, M.; Kiss, A.; Tobe, S.W.; Grant, F.C.; Kaczorowski, J. Conventional Versus Automated Measurement of Blood Pressure in Primary Care Patients with Systolic Hypertension: Randomised Parallel Design Controlled Trial. BMJ 2011, 342, d286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  227. Andreadis, E.A.; Geladari, C.V.; Angelopoulos, E. Automated Office Blood Pressure Measurements Obtained with and without Preceding Rest Are Associated with Awake Ambulatory Blood Pressure. J. Clin. Hypertens. 2019, 22, 32–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  228. Li, L.; Chen, J.; Bing, S.; Liu, K.; Cheng, R.; Wan, Y. Validation of the Wellvii VitalDetect Blood Pressure Monitor in General Population According to the International Standardization Organization 81060-2:2018. Blood Press. Monit. 2023, 29, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  229. Song, X.; Li, G.; Qiao, A.; Chen, Z. Association of Simultaneously Measured Four-Limb Blood Pressures with Cardiovascular Function: A Cross-Sectional Study. Biomed. Eng. Online 2016, 15, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  230. Liu, K.; Wu, D.; Bing, S.; Li, L. Validation of the ANDON KD-595 Automated Upper-Arm Blood Pressure Monitor According to the Universal Standard. Blood Press. Monit. 2023, 29, 103–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  231. Yang, S.; Zhou, Z.; Miao, H.; Yin, Z.; Duan, X.C.; Zhang, Y. Analysis of the Accuracy of Unattended Automated Blood Pressure Measurements and Control of Blood Pressure Thresholds: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study. J. Clin. Hypertens. 2025, 27, e70070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  232. Clark, C.E.; McDonagh, S.T.J.; McManus, R.J. Accuracy of Automated Blood Pressure Measurements in the Presence of Atrial Fibrillation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Hum. Hypertens. 2019, 33, 352–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  233. Stergiou, G.S.; Κόλλιας, A.; Destounis, A.; Tzamouranis, D. Automated Blood Pressure Measurement in Atrial Fibrillation. J. Hypertens. 2012, 30, 2074–2082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  234. Juraschek, S.P.; Ishak, A.; Mukamal, K.J.; Wood, J.M.; Anderson, T.S.; Cohen, M.L.; Li, J.X.; Cluett, J. Impact of 30- Versus 60-Second Time Intervals Between Automated Office Blood Pressure Measurements on Measured Blood Pressure. Hypertension 2021, 78, 1502–1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  235. Venkatakrishnan, V.; Mahmood, S.F.; Rammurthy, R. Comparison of Automated Non—Invasive Blood Pressure Measurement vs. Manual Non—Invasive Blood Pressure Measurement Among Patients Coming for Pre-Anaesthetic Evaluation. J. Evol. Med. Dent. Sci. 2015, 4, 16444–16446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  236. Mesquita, C.T. The Accuracy of Blood Pressure Measurement. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Sci. 2017, 30, 98–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  237. Stergiou, G.S.; Boubouchairopoulou, N.; Κόλλιας, A. Accuracy of Automated Blood Pressure Measurement in Children. Hypertension 2017, 69, 1000–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  238. Hwang, S.H.; Lee, H.; Lee, J.H.; Lee, M.; Koyanagi, A.; Smith, L.; Rhee, S.Y.; Yon, D.K.; Lee, J. Machine Learning-Based Prediction for Incident Hypertension Based on Regular Health Checkup Data: Derivation and Validation in 2 Independent Nationwide Cohorts in South Korea and Japan. J. Med. Internet Res. 2024, 26, e52794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  239. Islam, S.M.S.; Talukder, A.; Awal, M.A.; Siddiqui, M.M.U.; Ahamad, M.M.; Ahammed, B.; Rawal, L.B.; Alizadehsani, R.; Abawajy, J.; Laranjo, L.; et al. Machine Learning Approaches for Predicting Hypertension and Its Associated Factors Using Population-Level Data from Three South Asian Countries. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2022, 9, 839379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  240. Al-Alusi, M.A.; Friedman, S.F.; Kany, S.; Ramo, J.T.; Pipilas, D.; Singh, P.; Reeder, C.; Khurshid, S.; Pirruccello, J.P.; Maddah, M.; et al. A deep learning digital biomarker to detect hypertension and stratify cardiovascular risk from the electrocardiogram. npj Digit. Med. 2025, 8, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  241. Skalidis, I.; Maurizi, N.; Salihu, A.; Fournier, S.; Cook, S.; Iglesias, J.F.; Laforgia, P.; D’Angelo, L.; Garot, P.; Hovasse, T.; et al. Artificial Intelligence and Advanced Digital Health for Hypertension: Evolving Tools for Precision Cardiovascular Care. Medicina 2025, 61, 1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  242. Zavaleta-Monestel, E.; Bogantes, L.C.M.; Chavarría-Rodríguez, S.; Arguedas-Chacón, S.; Bastos-Soto, N.; Villalobos-Madriz, J. Artificial Intelligence Tools That Improve Medication Adherence in Patients with Chronic Noncommunicable Diseases: An Updated Review. Cureus 2025, 17, e83132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  243. Reis, Z.S.N.; Pereira, G.M.V.; Dias, C.d.S.; Lage, E.M.; de Oliveira, I.J.R.; Pagano, A.S. Artificial Intelligence-Based Tools for Patient Support to Enhance Medication Adherence: A Focused Review. Front. Digit. Health 2025, 7, 1523070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  244. Aggarwal, A.; Tam, C.C.; Wu, D.; Li, X.; Qiao, S.J. Artificial Intelligence-Based Chatbots for Promoting Health Behavioral Changes: Systematic Review. Med. Internet Res. 2023, 25, e40789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  245. Labovitz, D.L.; Shafner, L.; Gil, M.R.; Virmani, D.; Hanina, A. Using Artificial Intelligence to Reduce the Risk of Nonadherence in Patients on Anticoagulation Therapy. Stroke 2017, 48, 1416–1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  246. Ganti, V.G.; Carek, A.M.; Jung, H.; Srivatsa, A.V.; Cherry, D.; Johnson, L.N.; Inan, O.T. Enabling Wearable Pulse Transit Time-Based Blood Pressure Estimation for Medically Underserved Areas and Health Equity: Comprehensive Evaluation Study. JMIR mHealth uHealth 2021, 9, e27466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  247. Kario, K.; Shimbo, D.; Tomitani, N.; Kanegae, H.; Schwartz, J.E.; Williams, B. The First Study Comparing a Wearable Watch-type Blood Pressure Monitor with a Conventional Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitor on In-office and Out-of-office Settings. J. Clin. Hypertens. 2020, 22, 135–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  248. Schukraft, S.; Boukhayma, A.; Cook, S.; Caizzone, A. Remote Blood Pressure Monitoring with a Wearable Photoplethysmographic Device (Senbiosys): Protocol for a Single-Center Prospective Clinical Trial. JMIR Res. Protoc. 2021, 10, e30051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  249. Andriekutė, S.; Bagdonaitė, K.; Savickas, M.; Ziutelienė, K. Photoplethysmography Technology Use in Smart Devices for Early Diagnosis of Arterial Hypertension: A Systematic Review. Arter. Hypertens. 2024, 28, 12–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  250. Avolio, A.; Cox, J.M.; Louka, K.; Shirbani, F.; Tan, I.; Qasem, A.; Butlin, M. Challenges Presented by Cuffless Measurement of Blood Pressure if Adopted for Diagnosis and Treatment of Hypertension. Pulse 2022, 10, 34–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  251. Zhang, M.; Shi, Y.; Zhou, B.; Huang, Z.; Zhao, Z.; Li, C.; Zhang, X.; Han, G.; Peng, K.; Li, X.; et al. Prevalence, Awareness, Treatment, and Control of Hypertension in China, 2004–2018: Findings from Six Rounds of a National Survey. BMJ 2023, 380, e071952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  252. Hatfaludi, C.-A.; Danu, M.-D.; Leonte, H.-A.; Popescu, A.-B.; Condrea, F.; Aldea, G.-D.; Sandu, A.-E.; Leordeanu, M.; Suciu, C.; Rodean, I.-P.; et al. Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Emergencies—Status Quo and Outlook. J. Cardiovasc. Emergencies 2023, 9, 83–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  253. Khan, N.; Stergiou, G.S.; Omboni, S.; Kario, K.; Renna, N.F.; Chapman, N.; McManus, R.J.; Williams, B.; Parati, G.; Konradi, A.; et al. Virtual Management of Hypertension: Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic–International Society of Hypertension Position Paper Endorsed by the World Hypertension League and European Society of Hypertension. J. Hypertens. 2022, 40, 1435–1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  254. Lobo, E.H.; Karmakar, C.; Abdelrazek, M.; Abawajy, J.; Chow, C.K.; Zhang, Y.; Kabir, M.A.; Daryabeygi, R.; Maddison, R.; Islam, S.M.S. Design and development of a smartphone app for hypertension management: An intervention mapping approach. Front Public Health 2023, 11, 1092755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  255. Yan, M.; Sun, W.; Tan, C.Y.L.; Wu, Y.; Liu, Y. Analysis of Factors Influencing the Willingness of Chinese Older Adults to Use mHealth Devices: Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey Study. J. Med. Internet Res. 2025, 27, e66804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  256. He, Y. Exploring the Emerging Trends and Hot Topics of 5G Technology Application in Wireless Medicine: A Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis. Medicine 2025, 104, e43310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  257. Ma, G.; Zhong, Z.; Duan, Y.; Shen, Z.; Qin, N.; Hu, D. Development and Validation of a Self-Quantification Scale for Patients with Hypertension. Front. Public. Health 2022, 10, 849859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  258. Wang, Y. Risk Analysis and Countermeasures for Wearable Mobile Medical Devices. Adv. Econ. Manag. Political Sci. 2023, 6, 237–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  259. Kabutoya, T.; Hoshide, S.; Kario, K. Asian Management of Hypertension: Current Status, Home Blood Pressure, and Specific Concerns in Japan. J. Clin. Hypertens. 2019, 22, 486–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  260. Tapos, G.F.; Cimpeanu, I.A.; Predescu, I.A.; Liga, S.; Pacurar, A.T.; Vlad, D.; Boru, C.; Luca, S.; Crisan, S.; Vacarescu, C.; et al. An Integrative Review of the Cardiovascular Disease Spectrum: Integrating Multi-Omics and Artificial Intelligence for Precision Cardiology. Diseases 2026, 14, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  261. Kario, K.; Hoshide, S.; Mogi, M. Digital Hypertension 2023: Concept, Hypothesis, and New Technology. Hypertens. Res. 2022, 45, 1529–1530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  262. Lemp, J.M.; Nuthanapati, M.P.; Bärnighausen, T.; Vollmer, S.; Geldsetzer, P.; Jani, A. Use of Lifestyle Interventions in Primary Care for Individuals with Newly Diagnosed Hypertension, Hyperlipidaemia or Obesity: A Retrospective Cohort Study. J. R. Soc. Med. 2022, 115, 289–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  263. Trimaille, A.; Lafitte, S.; Begue, F.; Beuque, G.; Weizman, O.; Lucain, P.; Bouali, N.; Garban, T.; Villaceque, M.; Barraud, J.; et al. Unveiling facilitators and barriers to artificial intelligence implementation in cardiac healthcare: Rationale and design of the INSIGHT-AI France study, from the Artificial Intelligence Working Group and the National College of Cardiologists in Training of the French Society of Cardiology. Arch. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2026, 119, 132–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  264. Sheilini, M.; Hande, M.; Ravishankar, N.; Akshay, M.J.; Nayak, J.G.; Chandrababu, R. Effectiveness of an mHealth Program on Reducing Blood Pressure Among Young Adults with Prehypertension: Protocol of a Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res. Protoc. 2025, 14, e67216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  265. Akpa, O.; Okekunle, A.P.; Ovbiagele, B.; Sarfo, F.S.; Akinyemi, R.; Akpalu, A.; Wahab, K.; Komolafe, M.; Obiako, R.; Owolabi, L.; et al. Factors Associated with Hypertension Among Stroke-free Indigenous Africans: Findings from the SIREN Study. J. Clin. Hypertens. 2021, 23, 773–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  266. Awan, M.U.M.; Nasir, W.; Zafar, S.; Mushtaq, H.H.; Ullah, A.; Hayyat, M.U.; Akram, Z.; Tahir, T.B.; Noor, A. Assessment of Modifiable Risk Factors Associated with Hypertensive Patients. J. Health Rehabil. Res. 2024, 4, 1518–1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  267. Wiles, J.; Rees-Roberts, M.; O’Driscoll, J.M.; Doulton, T.; MacInnes, D.; Short, V.; Pellatt-Higgins, T.; Saxby, K.; Gousia, K.; West, A.; et al. Feasibility study to assess the delivery of a novel isometric exercise intervention for people with stage 1 hypertension in the NHS: Protocol for the IsoFIT-BP study including amendments to mitigate the risk of COVID-19. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2021, 7, 192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  268. Walburg, F.S.; Meijel, B.v.; Tulder, M.W.v.; Adriaanse, M.C. Cost-Effectiveness of a Lifestyle Intervention for People with a Serious Mental Illness (SMILE): Design of a Pragmatic Cluster-Randomised Controlled Trial. BMC Psychiatry 2019, 19, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  269. Bohmke, N.J.; Dixon, D.L.; Kirkman, D.L. Chrono-nutrition for Hypertension. Diabetes/Metab. Res. Rev. 2024, 40, e3760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  270. Saranjam, F.; Afrasiabifar, A.; Alamdari, A.; Hosseini, N. Effect of Leventhal’s Self-Regulatory Intervention on the Hypertensive Patients’ Illness Perception and Lifestyle: A Randomized Controlled Trial. BMC Cardiovasc. Disord. 2023, 23, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  271. Marin-Couture, E.; Moulin, J.-A.; Thibault, A.; Poirier, P.; Després, J.P.; Gallant, A.; Lamarre, V.; Alméras, N.; Lemieux, I.; Chabot, C.; et al. Impact of Lifestyle Medicine Interventions on the Management of Systemic Hypertension in Primary Care: A Canadian Randomized Controlled Trial. Am. J. Lifestyle Med. 2024, 18, 703–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  272. Wang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Liu, L.; Hong, L.; Chen, H.Q. Comparative Analysis of Hypertension Guidelines: Unveiling Consensus and Discrepancies in Lifestyle Modifications for Blood Pressure Control. Cardiol. Res. Pract. 2023, 2023, 5586403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  273. Kundapur, R.; Modi, B.; Rashmi, A.; Mendagudli, R.R.; Sunhitha, V.; Saxena, D. A Community Trial in Coastal Karnataka Using Life Style Modifications to Assess Its Impact on Hypertension and Diabetes. Indian J. Commun. Med. 2023, 48, 684–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  274. Chen, M.-L.; Hu, J.; McCoy, T.P.; Letvak, S.; Ivanov, L.L. Effect of a Lifestyle-Based Intervention on Health-Related Quality of Life in Older Adults with Hypertension. J. Aging Res. 2018, 2018, 6059560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  275. Allam, F.N.B.; Hamid, M.R.A.; Buhari, S.S.; Noor, H.M. Web-Based Dietary and Physical Activity Intervention Programs for Patients with Hypertension: Scoping Review. J. Med. Internet Res. 2021, 23, e22465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  276. Xu, H.; Long, H. The Effect of Smartphone App–Based Interventions for Patients with Hypertension: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JMIR mHealth uHealth 2020, 8, e21759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  277. Trivedi, J.R.; Slaughter, M.S.; Pan, Q.; Vijaykrishnan, R.; Gopinathannair, R. Role of Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillator in Patients Awaiting Heart Transplant in the Continuous-flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Era. Artif. Organs 2021, 45, 845–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  278. Daimon, A.; Kamiya, C.; Sawada, M.; Ueda, Y.; Horiuchi, C.; Miyoshi, T.; Tsuritani, M.; Iwanaga, N.; Neki, R.; Okamura, H.; et al. Utility of Fluid Assessment Based on the Intrathoracic Impedance Monitoring in a Peripartum Woman with Heart Disease. Int. Heart J. 2018, 59, 435–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  279. Al-Damluji, M.S.; Singhvi, A.; Snuckel, M.; Zaghloul, A.; Kluger, J. Do ICD Diagnostics Predict Failure of Ventricular Tachycardia Response to Antitachycardia Pacing and Need for Shock? Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. 2020, 43, 1302–1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  280. Karacan, M.N.; Doi, S.N.; Yafasova, A.; Thune, J.J.; Nielsen, J.C.; Haarbo, J.; Bruun, N.E.; Gustafsson, F.; Eiskjær, H.; Hassager, C.; et al. New York Heart Association Functional Class and Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillator in Non-ischaemic Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: Extended Follow-up of the DANISH Trial. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2024, 26, 1423–1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  281. Madeira, M.; António, N.; Milner, J.; Ventura, M.; Cristóvão, J.; Costa, M.A.; Nascimento, J.; Elvas, L.; Gonçalves, L.; Pêgo, G.M. Who Still Remains at Risk of Arrhythmic Death at Time of Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillator Generator Replacement? Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. 2017, 40, 1129–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  282. Deng, J.-L.; Wu, Y.-X.; Liu, J. Efficacy of Implantable Cardioconverter Defibrillator or Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Compared with Combined Therapy in Survival of Patients with Heart Failure. Medicine 2015, 94, e418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  283. Khazanie, P.; Greiner, M.A.; Al-Khatib, S.M.; Piccini, J.P.; Turakhia, M.P.; Varosy, P.; Masoudi, F.A.; Curtis, L.H.; Hernandez, A.F. Comparative Effectiveness of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Among Patients with Heart Failure and Atrial Fibrillation. Circ. Heart Fail. 2016, 9, e002324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  284. MacIntyre, C.; Sapp, J.L.; AbdelWahab, A.; Alharbi, M.; Doucette, S.; Gray, C.; Gardner, M.J.; Parkash, R. The Effect of Shock Burden on Heart Failure and Mortality. CJC Open 2019, 1, 161–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  285. Roth, G.A.; Poole, J.E.; Zaha, R.; Zhou, W.; Skinner, J.; Morden, N.E. Use of Guideline-Directed Medications for Heart Failure Before Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantation. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2016, 67, 1062–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  286. Looi, K.L.; Sidhu, K.; Cooper, L.; Dawson, L.; Slipper, D.; Gavin, A.; Lever, N. Gender Differences in the Use of Primary Prevention ICDs in New Zealand Patients with Heart Failure. Heart Asia 2018, 10, e010985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  287. Roller, T.; Heinke, M.; Hörth, J. Pacing Electrode Modeling and Simulation of Cardiac Contractility Modulation. Curr. Dir. Biomed. Eng. 2018, 4, 551–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  288. Aonuma, K.; Andò, K.; Kusano, K.; Asai, T.; Inoue, K.; Inamura, Y.; Ikeda, T.; Mitsuhashi, T.; Murohara, T.; Nishii, N.; et al. Primary Results from the Japanese Heart Failure and Sudden Cardiac Death Prevention Trial (HINODE). Esc. Heart Fail. 2022, 9, 1584–1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  289. Bansal, N.; Szpiro, A.A.; Reynolds, K.; Smith, D.H.; Magid, D.J.; Gurwitz, J.H.; Masoudi, F.A.; Greenlee, R.T.; Tabada, G.H.; Sung, S.H.; et al. Long-Term Outcomes Associated with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator in Adults with Chronic Kidney Disease. JAMA Intern. Med. 2018, 178, 390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  290. Chen, C.-Y.; Stevenson, L.W.; Stewart, G.C.; Bhatt, D.L.; Desai, M.; Seeger, J.D.; Williams, L.; Jalbert, J.J.; Setoguchi, S. Real World Effectiveness of Primary Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators Implanted During Hospital Admissions for Exacerbation of Heart Failure or Other Acute Co-Morbidities: Cohort Study of Older Patients with Heart Failure. BMJ 2015, 351, h3529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  291. Looi, K.L.; Sidhu, K.; Cooper, L.; Dawson, L.; Slipper, D.; Gavin, A.; Lever, N. Long-term Outcomes of Heart Failure Patients Who Received Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillator: An Observational Study. J. Arrhythmia 2017, 34, 46–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  292. Xing, Z.; Tang, L.; Chen, C.; Huang, J.; Zhu, Z.; Hu, X. Effectiveness of Implantation of Cardioverter-Defibrillators Therapy in Patients with Non-Ischemic Heart Failure: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Braz. J. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2017, 32, 417–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed Central]
  293. Foo, F.S.; Lee, M.; Looi, K.L.; Larsen, P.; Clare, G.C.; Heaven, D.; Stiles, M.K.; Voss, J.; Boddington, D.; Jackson, R.; et al. Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Use in New Zealand (ANZACS-QI 33). J. Arrhythmia 2019, 36, 153–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  294. Cho, Y.; Cho, S.Y.; Oh, I.Y.; Lee, J.H.; Park, J.J.; Lee, H.Y.; Kim, K.H.; Yoo, B.S.; Kang, S.M.; Baek, S.H.; et al. Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Utilization and Its Outcomes in Korea: Data from Korean Acute Heart Failure Registry. J. Korean Med. Sci. 2020, 35, 1146235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  295. Teo, Z.L.; Thirunavukarasu, A.J.; Elangovan, K.; Cheng, H.; Moova, P.; Soetikno, B.; Nielsen, C.; Pollreisz, A.; Ting, D.S.J.; Morris, R.J.T.; et al. Generative artificial intelligence in medicine. Nat. Med. 2025, 31, 3270–3282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  296. Hess, P.L.; Hernandez, A.F.; Bhatt, D.L.; Hellkamp, A.S.; Yancy, C.W.; Schwamm, L.H.; Peterson, E.D.; Schulte, P.J.; Fonarow, G.C.; Al-Khatib, S.M. Sex and Race/Ethnicity Differences in Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Counseling and Use Among Patients Hospitalized with Heart Failure. Circulation 2016, 134, 517–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  297. Ursaru, A.M.; Petriș, A.O.; Costache, I.I.; Tesloianu, D. Comparable Efficacy in Ischemic and Non-Ischemic ICD Recipients for the Primary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 1595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  298. Maron, B.J.; Casey, S.A.; Olivotto, I.; Sherrid, M.V.; Semsarian, C.; Autore, C.; Ahmed, A.; Boriani, G.; Francia, P.; Winters, S.L.; et al. Clinical Course and Quality of Life in High-Risk Patients with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators. Circ. Arrhythmia Electrophysiol. 2018, 11, e005820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  299. Cui, F.; Tong, Y.; Liu, G.; Zhang, W.; Liu, K.; Si, D.; He, Y. Intracoronary Imaging-Guided Rotational Atherectomy Combined with Intravascular Lithotripsy in the Treatment of Severe Coronary Artery Calcification—A Case Report. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2023, 10, 1184237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  300. Şaylık, F.; Hayıroğlu, M.İ.; Akbulut, T.; Çınar, T. Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes Between Intravascular Ultrasound-, Optical Coherence Tomography- and Angiography-Guided Stent Implantation: A Meta-Analysis. Angiology 2023, 75, 809–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  301. Krittanawong, C.; Ang, S.P.; Qadeer, Y.K.; Wang, Z.; Alam, M.; Jneid, H.; Sharma, S. National Trends, Mortality and Outcomes in Intravascular Imaging-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the United States. Crit. Pathw. Cardiol. A J. Evid.-Based Med. 2024, 23, 202–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  302. Regragui, H.; Boussaadani, B.E.; Sasbou, L.; Bouhdadi, H.; Wazaren, H.; Cherti, M. Conservative Management of Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: A Case Report. Pan Afr. Med. J. 2020, 36, 334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  303. Januszek, R.; Siudak, Z.; Malinowski, K.P.; Wańha, W.; Surowiec, S.; Heba, G.; Pawlik, A.; Kameczura, T.; Wojakowski, W.; Jaguszewski, M.; et al. Factors Determining the Frequency of Optical Coherence Tomography and Intravascular Ultrasound Use in Patients Treated with Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Recent Years: Analysis Based on a Large National Registry. Kardiol. Pol. 2023, 81, 969–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  304. D’Ascenzo, F.; Improta, R.; Giacobbe, F.; Pietro, G.D.; Zugna, D.; Siliano, S.; Gatti, M.; Bruno, F.; Kakuta, T.; Tahk, S.J.; et al. Assessing Diagnostic Accuracy of Intravascular Imaging for Functionally Significant Coronary Stenosis: Updated Findings from a Meta-Analysis. Heart 2024, 111, 195–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  305. Krupniković, K.; Obradović, D.; Ilić, I.; Dobrić, M. Multimodality Imaging and Advanced Calcium Treatment to Facilitate PCI in a Rare Coronary Artery Anomaly—Case Report. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2025, 12, 1471211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  306. Sattar, Y.; Razzack, A.A.; Kompella, R.; Alhajri, N.; Arshad, J.; Ullah, W.; Zghouzi, M.; Mir, T.; Power, D.; Qureshi, W.; et al. Outcomes of Intravascular Ultrasound Versus Optical Coherence Tomography Guided Percutaneous Coronary Angiography: A Meta regression-basedAnalysis. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2021, 99, E1–E11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  307. Maddali, V.R.; Koganti, S. Role of Optical Coherence Tomography in Coronary Interventions. Indian. J. Clin. Cardiol. 2024, 5, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  308. Ali, W.B.; Pesaranghader, A.; Avram, R.; Overtchouk, P.; Perrin, N.; Laffite, S.; Cartier, R.; Ibrahim, R.; Modine, T.; Hussin, J. Implementing Machine Learning in Interventional Cardiology: The Benefits Are Worth the Trouble. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2021, 8, 711401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  309. Oosterveer, T.T.M.; Sander, M.v.d.M.; Scherptong, R.W.; Jukema, J.W. Optical Coherence Tomography: Current Applications for the Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease and Guidance of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions. Cardiol. Ther. 2020, 9, 307–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  310. Sanuki, Y.; Sonoda, S.; Muraoka, Y.; Inoue, K.; Setoyama, K.; Miura, T.; Shimizu, A.; Anai, R.; Miyamoto, T.; Oginosawa, Y.; et al. Impact of High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin Elevation in Relation to Diagnostic Invasive Intravascular Imaging for the Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease. Int. Heart J. 2019, 60, 601–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  311. Miao, F.; Wu, D.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, R.; Tang, M.; Li, Y. Wearable Sensing, Big Data Technology for Cardiovascular Healthcare: Current Status and Future Prospective. Chin. Med. J. 2022, 136, 1015–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  312. Nekui, O.D.; Wang, W.; Liu, C.; Wang, Z.; Ding, B. IoT-Based Heartbeat Rate-Monitoring Device Powered by Harvested Kinetic Energy. Sensors 2024, 24, 4249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  313. Tegegne, M.D.; Niakan Kalhori, S.R.; Haas, P.; Sobotta, V.M.; Warnecke, J.; Deserno, T.M. Wearable Devices for Remote Monitoring of Chronic Diseases: Systematic Review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2026, 14, e74071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  314. Muralidhara, S.; Pandian, P.S. Wearable Wireless Body Area Nodes for Remote Physiological Signal Monitoring System. J. Biomed. Sci. Eng. 2019, 12, 151–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  315. Wang, X.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, T. Flexible Sensing Electronics for Wearable/Attachable Health Monitoring. Small 2017, 13, 1602790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  316. Dias, D.; Paulo Silva Cunha, J. Wearable Health Devices-Vital Sign Monitoring, Systems and Technologies. Sensors 2018, 18, 2414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  317. Fortin, J.; Rogge, D.E.; Fellner, C.; Flotzinger, D.; Grond, J.; Lerche, K.; Saugel, B. A Novel Art of Continuous Noninvasive Blood Pressure Measurement. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  318. Mishra, R. Advancements in Flexible Electronics for Wearable Health Monitoring Devices. IJRMEET 2022, 10, 18–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  319. Weaver, K.; Shumway, D.; Yang, T.H.; Kim, Y.-M.; Koo, J.H. Investigation of Variable Stiffness Effects on Radial Pulse Measurements Using Magneto-Rheological Elastomers. In Proceedings of the ASME 2019 Conference on Smart Materials, Adaptive Structures and Intelligent Systems, Louisville, KY, USA, 9–11 September 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  320. Yilmaz, T.; Foster, R.; Hao, Y. Detecting Vital Signs with Wearable Wireless Sensors. Sensors 2010, 10, 10837–10862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  321. Abdellatif, S.O.; Moustafa, A.G.; Ahmed, K.; Ghannam, R. Integration of Capacitive Pressure Sensor-on-Chip with Lead-Free Perovskite Solar Cells for Continuous Health Monitoring. Micromachines 2023, 14, 1676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  322. An, B.W.; Shin, J.H.; Kim, S.Y.; Kim, J.; Ji, S.; Park, J.; Lee, Y.; Jang, J.; Park, Y.G.; Cho, E.; et al. Smart Sensor Systems for Wearable Electronic Devices. Polymers 2017, 9, 303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  323. Jena, N. Wearable Technology in Cardiology: Advancements, Applications, and Future Prospects. Rev. Cardiovasc. Med. 2025, 26, 39025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  324. Leszczyńska, A. The Integration of Artificial Intelligence Into Robotic Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 6181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  325. Bolcal, C.; Kadan, M.; Kubat, E.; Erol, G.; Karabacak, K. Robotic Redo Mitral Valve Replacement Combined with Dysfunctional Amplatzer Plug Resection on a Beating Heart. Turk. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2021, 29, 391–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  326. Li, X.; Liu, Z.; Kong, R.; Zhang, C.; Ge, S. Robot-assisted Beating-heart Surgery for Atrial Septal Defect Repair in a Case of Situs Inversus Totalis with Dextrocardia. Int. J. Med. Robot. Comput. Assist. Surg. 2021, 17, e2304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  327. Shiferaw, K.B.; Wali, P.; Waltemath, D.; Zeleke, A.A. Navigating the AI Frontiers in Cardiovascular Research: A Bibliometric Exploration and Topic Modeling. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2024, 10, 1308668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  328. Alguizzani, N.; Khouqeer, F.; Alorini, R.; Oberi, I.A. Perceptions of Cardiac Surgeons Regarding the Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Cardiac Surgery. J. Saudi Heart Assoc. 2025, 37, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  329. Leivaditis, V.; Beltsios, E.; Papatriantafyllou, A.; Grapatsas, K.; Mulita, F.; Kontodimopoulos, N.; Baikoussis, N.G.; Tchabashvili, L.; Tasios, K.; Maroulis, I.; et al. Artificial Intelligence in Cardiac Surgery: Transforming Outcomes and Shaping the Future. Clin. Pract. 2025, 15, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  330. Mirzai, S.; Hibino, N.; Torregrossa, G.; Balkhy, H.H. Adult Ventricular Septal Defect Repair Using a Robotic Totally Endoscopic Approach: A Case Report. Innov. Technol. Tech. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Surg. 2020, 15, 372–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  331. Nisivaco, S.; Patel, B.; Balkhy, H.H. Robotic Totally Endoscopic Excision of Aortic Valve Papillary Fibroelastoma: The Least Invasive Approach. J. Card. Surg. 2019, 34, 1492–1497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  332. Bolcal, C.; Kadan, M.; Sicim, H.; Ulubay, M.; Yıldırım, V. Redo Robotic Cardiac Surgery and Concomitant Cesarean Section in a Pregnant Patient with Dextrocardia and Situs Inversus Totalis. J. Card. Surg. 2019, 34, 863–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  333. Hung, L.-W.; Lee, C.-Y.; Hii, H.P.; Wu, N.C.; Cheng, B.C. Robot-Assisted Endoscopic Removal of a Huge Tricuspid Valve Myxoma: Case Report. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2022, 17, 258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  334. Benetti, F.; González, J.N.; Scialacomo, N. Left Internal Mammary Artery to Left Anterior Descending Artery. An Alternative for Old, High-Risk, Multivessel, Coronary Artery Disease Patients and an Approach for Hybrid Revascularization. Clin. Cardiol. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2022, 5, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  335. Güllü, A.Ü.; Şenay, Ş.; Koçyiğit, M.; Zencirci, E.; Akyol, A.; Değirmencioğlu, A.; Karakuş, G.; Ersin, E.; Karabiber, A.; Alhan, C. An Analysis of The learning Curve for Robotic-assisted Mitral Valve Repair. J. Card. Surg. 2021, 36, 624–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  336. Raharjo, S.W.; Suwadi, P.; Novianto, W.T. An Ideal Regulatory Framework for Robotic Surgery Utilization in Indonesia. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Law, Economic & Good Governance (IC-LAW 2023); Atlantis Press: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  337. Kadan, M.; Erol, G.; Kubat, E.; İnce, M.; Akyol, F.B.; Karabacak, K.; Doğancı, S.; Yıldırım, V.; Bolcal, C.; Demirkılıç, U. Robotic Repair of Atrial Septal Defect with Partial Pulmonary Venous Return Anomaly: Our 5 year Experience. Int. J. Med. Robot. Comput. Assist. Surg. 2022, 18, e2395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  338. Özcan, Z.S.; Arslanhan, G.; Şenay, Ş.; Koçyiğit, M.; Alhan, C. Simple Tool for Bleeding Control During Minimally Invasive and Robotic Cardiac Surgery. Innov. Technol. Tech. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Surg. 2023, 18, 503–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  339. Ishikawa, N.; Watanabe, G.; Horikawa, T.; Tarui, T.; Seguchi, R.; Kiuchi, R.; Tomita, S.; Ohtsuka, T.; Kasagi, Y. Combined Robot-assisted Mitral Valve Plasty and Nuss Procedure via Small Ports. Artif. Organs 2021, 45, 633–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  340. Simone, B.D.; Abu-Zidan, F.M.; Gumbs, A.A.; Chouillard, É.; Saverio, S.D.; Sartelli, M.; Coccolini, F.; Ansaloni, L.; Collins, T.; Kluger, Y.; et al. Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Artificial Intelligence in Emergency and Trauma Surgery, the ARIES Project: An International Web-Based Survey. World J. Emerg. Surg. 2022, 17, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  341. Zhou, Y.; Xu, W.; Zeng, Y.; Li, H.; Liu, Z.; Wang, T.; Liu, J.; Jiang, H. Global Research Trends of the Application of Artificial Intelligence in Bladder Cancer Since the 21st Century: A Bibliometric Analysis. Front. Oncol. 2023, 13, 1227152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  342. Güllü, A.Ü.; Şenay, Ş.; Ersin, E.; Demirhisar, Ö.; Whitham, T.; Koçyiğit, M.; Alhan, C. Robotic-assisted Cardiac Surgery without Aortic Cross-clamping: A Safe Alternative Approach. J. Card. Surg. 2020, 36, 165–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  343. Qiu, Y.-H.; Li, Y.; Chen, Z.; Chai, N.-H.; Liang, X.; Zhang, D.; Wei, Z.Q. Application of the Advance Incision in Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Rectal Anterior Resection. Front. Surg. 2023, 10, 1141672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  344. Mishra, S.; Tomar, R.; Mishra, S.; Sharma, S. Pharmacotherapy Strategies for Metabolic and Endocrine Disorder. IJPPR 2024, 15, 74–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  345. Zyryanov, S.K.; Fitilev, S.B.; Vozzhaev, A.V.; Shkrebniova, I.I.; Shindryaeva, N.N.; Klyuev, D.A.; Stepanyan, L.N.; Landyshev, N.N.; Voronko, Y.G. Medication Adherence in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease in Primary Care. Res. Results Pharmacol. 2020, 6, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  346. Chopra, H.; Annu; Shin, D.K.; Munjal, K.; Priyanka; Dhama, K.; Emran, T.B. Revolutionizing clinical trials: The role of AI in accelerating medical breakthroughs. Int. J. Surg. 2023, 109, 4211–4220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  347. Walker, R.; Hillhouse, M.; Perrochet, B.; Sparenborg, S.; Mooney, L.J.; Ling, W. Medication Adherence Monitoring Using Smartphone Video Dosing in an Open-Label Pilot Study of Monthly Naltrexone Plus Once-Daily Bupropion for Methamphetamine Use Disorder: Feasibility and Acceptability. J. Addict. Med. 2019, 13, 372–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  348. Straka, I.; Minár, M.; Škorvánek, M.; Grofik, M.; Danterová, K.; Benetin, J.; Kurča, E.; Gažová, A.; Boleková, V.; Wyman-Chick, K.A.; et al. Adherence to Pharmacotherapy in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease Taking Three and More Daily Doses of Medication. Front. Neurol. 2019, 10, 799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  349. Kelly, M.S.; Dacey, A.; Siana, A.; Ojeda, J. Efficacy and Safety of a Polypill to Reduce Cardiovascular Events: A Review of Clinical Trials. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 2024, 83, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  350. Alalaqi, A.; Lawson, G.; Obaid, Y.; Tanna, S. Adherence to Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy by Patients in Iraq: A Mixed Methods Assessment Using Quantitative Dried Blood Spot Analysis and the 8-Item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0251115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  351. Martins, B.C.C.; da Costa, F.I.H.; Chaves, E.F.; Firmino, P.Y.M.; Paula Frassinetti Castelo Branco Camurça, F.; Marta Maria de França, F. Medication Regimen Complexity Index After Kidney Transplant in Fortaleza, Brazil. J. Young Pharm. 2023, 15, 338–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  352. Bakema, R.; Smirnova, D.; Biri, D.; Kocks, J.; Postma, M.J.; Jong, L.A.d. The Use of eHealth for Pharmacotherapy Management with Patients with Respiratory Disease, Cardiovascular Disease, or Diabetes: Scoping Review. J. Med. Internet Res. 2023, 25, e42474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  353. Warden, B.A.; Purnell, J.Q.; Duell, P.B.; Craigan, C.; Osborn, D.; Cabot, E.; Fazio, S. Real-World Utilization of Pharmacotherapy with New Evidence-Based Cardiovascular Indications in an Academic Preventive Cardiology Practice. Am. J. Prev. Cardiol. 2021, 5, 100144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  354. Geretsegger, C.; Pichler, E.; Gimpl, K.; Aichhorn, W.; Stelzig, R.; Grabher-Stoeffler, G.; Hiemke, C.; Zernig, G. Non-adherence to Psychotropic Medication Assessed by Plasma Level in Newly Admitted Psychiatric Patients: Prevalence Before Acute Admission. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 2019, 73, 175–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  355. Mohsen, F.; Al-Saadi, B.; Abdi, N.; Khan, S.; Shah, Z. Artificial Intelligence-Based Methods for Precision Cardiovascular Medicine. J. Pers. Med. 2023, 13, 1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  356. Wang, J.; Tang, X.; Lan, P.; Liang, B.; Fang, Y.; Li, H. Potential Therapeutic Mechanisms of Draconis Resina in Cardiovascular Diseases-a Narrative Review. Front. Pharmacol. 2025, 16, 1531873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  357. Yang, W.Y.; Mahgoub, M.; Saaoud, F.; Xu, K.; Shao, Y.; Lu, Y.; Dornas, W.; Cueto, R.; Jiang, X.; Wang, H.; et al. Perspective: Pathological Transdifferentiation—A Novel Therapeutic Target for Cardiovascular Diseases and Chronic Inflammation. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2024, 11, 1500775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  358. Holland, A.; Enrick, M.; Diaz, A.; Yin, L. Is miR-21 a Therapeutic Target in Cardiovascular Disease? Int. J. Drug Discov. Pharmacol. 2023, 2, 26–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  359. Croon, P.M.; Dhingra, L.S.; Biswas, D.; Oikonomou, E.K.; Khera, R. Phenotypic Selectivity of Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Electrocardiography in Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Risk Prediction. Circulation 2025, 152, 1282–1294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  360. Khera, R.; Asnani, A.H.; Krive, J.; Addison, D.; Zhu, H.; Vasbinder, A.; Fleming, M.R.; Arnaout, R.; Razavi, P.; Okwuosa, T.M.; et al. Artificial Intelligence to Enhance Precision Medicine in Cardio-Oncology: A Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association. Circ. Genom. Precis. Med. 2025, 18, e000097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  361. Wu, J.; Wu, J.; Li, Z.; Dong, X.; Yuan, S.; Liu, J.; Wang, L. The Neuroprotective Effect of Shenmai Injection on Oxidative Stress Injury in PC12 Cells Based on Network Pharmacology. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2022, 2022, 6969740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  362. Battaglini, D.; Pimentel-Coelho, P.M.; Robba, C.; Santos, C.C.d.; Cruz, F.F.; Pelosi, P.; Rocco, P.R.M. Gut Microbiota in Acute Ischemic Stroke: From Pathophysiology to Therapeutic Implications. Front. Neurol. 2020, 11, 598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  363. Petzer, V.; Theurl, I.; Weiß, G. Established and Emerging Concepts to Treat Imbalances of Iron Homeostasis in Inflammatory Diseases. Pharmaceuticals 2018, 11, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  364. Cheng, X.; Manandhar, I.; Aryal, S.; Joe, B. Application of Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Medicine. Compr. Physiol. 2021, 11, 2455–2466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  365. Sethi, Y.; Patel, N.; Kaka, N.; Desai, A.; Kaiwan, O.; Sheth, M.; Sharma, R.; Huang, H.; Chopra, H.; Khandaker, M.U.; et al. Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Cardiology: A Scoping Review. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 7072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  366. Stamate, E.; Piraianu, A.I.; Ciobotaru, O.R.; Crassas, R.; Duca, O.-M.; Fulga, A.; Grigore, I.; Vintila, V.; Fulga, I.; Ciobotaru, O.C. Revolutionizing Cardiology Through Artificial Intelligence—Big Data from Proactive Prevention to Precise Diagnostics and Cutting-Edge Treatment—A Comprehensive Review of the Past 5 Years. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  367. Rudnicka, Z.; Proniewska, K.; Perkins, M.D.; Pręgowska, A. Cardiac Healthcare Digital Twins Supported by Artificial Intelligence-Based Algorithms and Extended Reality—A Systematic Review. Electronics 2024, 13, 866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  368. Khan, M.R.; Haider, Z.M.; Hussain, J.; Malik, F.H.; Talib, I.; Abdullah, S. Comprehensive Analysis of Cardiovascular Diseases: Symptoms, Diagnosis, and AI Innovations. Bioengineering 2024, 11, 1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  369. Borchert, R.; Azevedo, T.; Badhwar, A.; Bernal, J.; Betts, M.J.; Bruffaerts, R.; Burkhart, M.C.; Dewachter, I.; Gellersen, H.M.; Low, A.; et al. Artificial Intelligence for Diagnostic and Prognostic Neuroimaging in Dementia: A Systematic Review. Alzheimer S Dement. 2023, 19, 5885–5904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  370. Kalimouttou, A. Harnessing AI in Critical Care: Opportunities, Challenges and Key Steps for Success. Thorax 2025, 81, 183–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  371. Choi, D.J.; Park, J.J.; Ali, T.; Lee, S. Artificial Intelligence for the Diagnosis of Heart Failure. npj Digit. Med. 2020, 3, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  372. Koulaouzidis, G.; Jadczyk, T.; Iakovidis, D.K.; Koulaouzidis, A.; Bisnaire, M.; Charisopoulou, D. Artificial Intelligence in Cardiology—A Narrative Review of Current Status. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 3910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  373. Pantelidis, P.; Dilaveris, P.; Ruipérez-Campillo, S.; Goliopoulou, A.; Giannakodimos, A.; Theofilis, P.; Lucia, R.D.; Κατσαρού, O.; Zisimos, K.; Kalogeras, K.; et al. Hearts, Data, and Artificial Intelligence Wizardry: From Imitation to Innovation in Cardiovascular Care. Biomedicines 2025, 13, 1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  374. Hussain, A. Is the FDA Regulation of Cardiology AI Devices Supporting Cardiovascular Innovation: A Scoping Review. Heart 2025, 6, 300–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  375. Kerndt, C.C.; Chopra, R.; Weber, P.M.; Rechenberg, A.; Summers, D.; Boyden, T.F.; Langholz, D. Using Artificial Intelligence to Semi-Quantitate Coronary Calcium as an ‘Incidentaloma’ on Non-Gated, Non-Contrast CT Scans, a Single-Center Descriptive Study in West Michigan. Spartan Med. Res. J. 2023, 8, 89132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  376. Vivekanandan, D.D.; Singh, N.; Robaczewski, M.; Wyer, A.; Canaan, L.N.; Whitson, D.; Grabill, N.; Louis, M. Artificial Intelligence-Driven Advances in Coronary Calcium Scoring: Expanding Preventive Cardiology. Cureus 2024, 16, e74681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  377. Ashraf, T.; Sultana, R. Artificial Intelligence the Future of Cardiology. Pak. Heart J. 2024, 57, 77–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  378. Tran, L.; Chi, L.; Bonti, A.; Abdelrazek, M.; Chen, Y.P.P. Mortality Prediction of Patients with Cardiovascular Disease Using Medical Claims Data Under Artificial Intelligence Architectures: Validation Study. JMIR Med. Inform. 2021, 9, e25000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  379. Yannakula, V.K.; Alluri, A.; Samuel, D.; Popoola, S.A.; Barake, B.A.; Al-Abbasi, A.H.; Ahmed, A.; Bandy, D.A.C.; Jesi, N.J. The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Providing Real-Time Guidance During Interventional Cardiology Procedures: A Narrative Review. Cureus 2025, 17, e83464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  380. Karatzia, L.; Aung, N.; Aksentijević, D. Artificial Intelligence in Cardiology: Hope for the Future and Power for the Present. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2022, 9, 945726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  381. Scuricini, A.; Ramoni, D.; Liberale, L.; Montecucco, F.; Carbone, F. The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Research: Fear Less and Live Bolder. Eur. J. Clin. Investig. 2025, 55, e14364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  382. Maaßen, O.; Fritsch, S.; Palm, J.; Deffge, S.; Kunze, J.; Marx, G.; Riedel, M.; Schuppert, A.; Bickenbach, J. Future Medical Artificial Intelligence Application Requirements and Expectations of Physicians in German University Hospitals: Web-Based Survey. J. Med. Internet Res. 2021, 23, e26646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  383. Eynde, J.V.d.; Kutty, S.; Danford, D.A.; Manlhiot, C. Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Cardiology: Taking Baby Steps in the Big World of Data. Curr. Opin. Cardiol. 2021, 37, 130–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  384. Tolu-Akinnawo, O.; Ezekwueme, F.; Omolayo, O.; Batheja, S.; Awoyemi, T. Advancements in Artificial Intelligence in Noninvasive Cardiac Imaging: A Comprehensive Review. Clin. Cardiol. 2025, 48, e70087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  385. Ezekwueme, F.; Tolu-Akinnawo, O.; Smith, Z.; Ogunniyi, K.E. Non-Invasive Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease: The Role of AI in the Current Status and Future Directions. Cureus 2025, 17, e78994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  386. Leone, D.M.; O’Sullivan, D.; Jaimes, K.B. Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Electrocardiography: A Comprehensive Review. Children 2024, 12, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  387. Padovani, P.; Singh, Y.; Pass, R.H.; Vasile, C.M.; Nield, L.E.; Baruteau, A.E. E-Health: A Game Changer in Fetal and Neonatal Cardiology? J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 6865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  388. Russell, R.G.; Novak, L.L.; Patel, M.; Garvey, K.V.; Craig, K.J.T.; Jackson, G.P.; Moore, D.E.; Miller, B.M. Competencies for the Use of Artificial Intelligence–Based Tools by Health Care Professionals. Acad. Med. 2022, 98, 348–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  389. Geneş, M.; Deveci, B. A Clinical Evaluation of Cardiovascular Emergencies: A Comparison of Responses from ChatGPT, Emergency Physicians, and Cardiologists. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 2731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  390. Mahdavi, M.; Frings, D. Trust in AI Applications and Intention to Use Them in Cardiac Care Among Cardiologists in the UK: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. preprint 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  391. Ribeiro, P.; Patel, S.; Carlos, K.; Sehgal, S.; Pai, R.G.; Ribeiro, P.A. Desirable Characteristics of Consulting Cardiologists for Sustained Referrals by Primary Care Physicians. Int. Cardiovasc. Forum J. 2016, 6, 36–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  392. Gruca, T.S.; Pyo, T.H.; Nelson, G.C. Providing Cardiology Care in Rural Areas Through Visiting Consultant Clinics. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2016, 5, e002909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  393. Helm, P.; Kaemmerer, H.; Breithardt, G.; Sticker, E.; Keuchen, R.; Neidenbach, R.; Diller, G.P.; Tutarel, O.; Bauer, U. Transition in Patients with Congenital Heart Disease in Germany: Results of a Nationwide Patient Survey. Front. Pediatr. 2017, 5, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  394. Kashou, A.H.; Mulpuru, S.K.; Deshmukh, A.; Ko, W.-Y.; Attia, Z.I.; Carter, R.E.; Friedman, P.A.; Noseworthy, P.A. An Artificial Intelligence–enabled ECG Algorithm for Comprehensive ECG Interpretation: Can It Pass the ‘Turing Test’? Cardiovasc. Digit. Health J. 2021, 2, 164–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  395. Niioka, H.; Kume, T.; Kubo, T.; Soeda, T.; Watanabe, M.; Yamada, R.; Sakata, Y.; Miyamoto, Y.; Wang, B.; Nagahara, H.; et al. Automated Diagnosis of Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging on Plaque Vulnerability and Its Relation to Clinical Outcomes in Coronary Artery Disease. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 14067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  396. Adegboye, M. Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Health Information Literacy: Guidance for Healthcare Professionals. Libr. Hi Tech. News 2024, 41, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  397. Papadopoulou, S.L.; Dionysopoulos, D.; Mentesidou, V.; Loga, K.; Michalopoulou, S.; Koukoutzeli, C.; Efthimiadis, K.G.; Kantartzi, V.; Timotheadou, E.; Stylıadis, I.; et al. Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Evaluation of Cardiac Function by Oncology Staff in Chemotherapy Patients. Eur. Heart J.-Digit. Health 2024, 5, 278–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  398. Naidoo, V.; Madamshetty, L.; Krishna, S.B.N. Artificial intelligence for cardiology: From diagnosis to management. Ther. Adv. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2026, 20, 17539447251406847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  399. Patel, D.; Kantamneni, R.; John, J.D.; Patel, T.; Shukla, A.; Salma, A.; Anand, N. Artificial intelligence in cardiology: An updated systematic review with ethical considerations and challenges in implementing artificial intelligence models. Ann. Med. Surg. 2026, 88, 1789–1805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  400. Wiefels, C.; Juarez-Orozco, L.E.; Craviolatti, P.S.; Diahiliev, O.; Eskander, A.; Giubbini, R.; Milan, E.; Zhou, W.; Karthikeyan, G.; Jimenez-Heffernan, A.; et al. Artificial intelligence in nuclear cardiology: Technical perspectives, strategic directions, and recommendations from an IAEA expert working group. Semin. Nucl. Med. 2026, 56, 119–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.