There was an error in the original publication [1]. The value of the term of the function relating the standard measurement uncertainty, , to the measurement value, x, was stated as being equal to instead of .
A correction has been made to Section 3, ‘Illustrative Case Study’, paragraph number 8:
The NHANES quality control data of the FPG measurements was retrieved for the same period (2005–2016). In total, 1350 QC samples had been analyzed. The weighted nonlinear least squares analysis [36] yielded the following function relating the standard measurement uncertainty to the measurement value, x:
where and .
The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction has been approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.
Reference
- Chatzimichail, T.; Hatjimihail, A.T. A Software Tool for Estimating Uncertainty of Bayesian Posterior Probability for Disease. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).