Next Article in Journal
Assessment of Gold and Mercury Losses in Artisanal Mining Operations in Korokpa, Minna, Niger State
Previous Article in Journal
Simplified Data Analysis for Electrical Resistance Tomography: Application to Hydrocyclones
Previous Article in Special Issue
Dependence of Bubble Size on Magnesite Flotation Recovery Using Sodium Oleate (NaOL) with Different Frothers
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Particle–Bubble Interactions in the Flotation Process

1
Key Laboratory of High-Efficiency and Clean Mechanical Manufacture, School of Mechanical Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China
2
School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2026, 16(4), 383; https://doi.org/10.3390/min16040383
Submission received: 31 March 2026 / Accepted: 1 April 2026 / Published: 3 April 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Particle–Bubble Interactions in the Flotation Process)

1. Introduction

Froth flotation remains a cornerstone separation technology in the global minerals industry, fundamentally reliant on the selective attachment of hydrophobic particles to air bubbles [1]. The overall efficiency of this process is governed by three sequential micro-scale sub-processes: collision, attachment, and detachment [2]. Each step is a complex interplay of hydrodynamic forces, interfacial chemistry, and particle characteristics, making a quantitative understanding of particle–bubble interactions paramount for advancing flotation science and engineering [3].
This field has evolved significantly from empirical observations to sophisticated investigations at the micro- and nano-scale, driven by advancements in characterization and computational tools. Modern techniques like atomic force microscopy (AFM) now enable direct, in situ measurement of interaction forces, providing unprecedented insights into film drainage and attachment kinetics [4,5]. Concurrently, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and direct numerical simulations (DNS) are increasingly used to model the turbulent multiphase flows characteristic of industrial flotation cells [6,7]. These fundamental advances are complemented by innovative process strategies, such as the application of micro- and nano-bubbles to enhance the recovery of notoriously difficult-to-float fine particles [8,9,10].
Despite progress, significant challenges persist. The “fine particle problem” (low collision probability) and the “coarse particle problem” (high detachment probability) represent fundamental limits to recovery [11]. Furthermore, a persistent “scale gap” exists between idealized laboratory measurements and the chaotic environment of industrial flotation, complicating the prediction of detachment in turbulent flows [12,13]. Computational models also struggle to fully integrate the coupling between turbulent hydrodynamics, surface chemistry, and particle-scale phenomena [14].
This Special Issue, entitled “Particle–Bubble Interactions in the Flotation Process”, captures the current dynamism at this research frontier. The collected works exemplify a synergistic approach: employing cutting-edge tools to deconstruct mechanistic details while developing innovative engineering solutions to address practical bottlenecks.

2. An Overview of Published Articles

The six articles in this collection address both foundational questions and practical challenges.
Batjargal et al. (Contribution 1) bridge fundamental bubble characteristics with flotation performance in magnesite flotation. Their work correlates bubble size distribution—influenced by frother selection—with attachment time and froth stability, providing empirical guidelines for optimizing the critical bubble/particle size ratio, a key parameter linked to both fine and coarse particle processing limits.
Addressing fine particle recovery, Bilgin and Ehsani (Contribution 2) demonstrate the efficacy of a combined flocculation–flotation approach for fine rutile ore. Their research on pH control and bio-derived reagents aligns with the broader need for tailored chemical regimes to improve the recovery of fine and complex ores.
Nicklas et al. (Contribution 3) present a fundamental nanoscale investigation into lithium-ion battery black mass recycling. Using Colloidal Probe AFM (CP-AFM), they directly quantify interaction forces between battery materials and bubbles in various salt solutions. Integrating these force measurements with the Stokes–Reynolds–Young–Laplace (SRYL) model and batch flotation tests provides a rigorous micro-mechanical explanation for selective salt flotation, showcasing the power of direct force measurement methodologies.
On the computational front, Wang et al. (Contribution 4) compare particle-resolved and point-particle approaches for modeling collisions in turbulence using the Lattice Boltzmann method (LBM). Their analysis clarifies the strengths and limitations of each method in capturing hydrodynamic effects, offering valuable guidance for selecting appropriate modeling frameworks to bridge the gap between simulations and industrial flows.
Han et al. (Contribution 5) introduce a novel “Reverse Sequence Collision Flotation (RSCF)” model, which alters the traditional gas–liquid–solid contact order. Through theoretical and experimental analysis, they provide evidence that this altered sequence can enhance collision and adhesion probabilities, introducing a fresh conceptual paradigm for improving flotation kinetics.
Finally, Jiang et al. (Contribution 6) translate a novel concept into practice by investigating “Atomized Reagent Addition with Synchronized Jet Pre-Mineralization” technology. Their semi-industrial tests on iron ore flotation show that atomizing fatty acid collectors improves grade, recovery, and reduces reagent consumption, demonstrating a successful path from lab-scale innovation to industrial application for fine-grained minerals.

3. Prospects and Challenges

3.1. Prospects

(1) Advanced Micro- and Nanobubble Technology:
The targeted use of micro- and nano-bubbles is a paradigm shift for recovering ultrafine particles (<20 μm) [15,16]. Future work must focus on scalable, energy-efficient generation systems and engineering bubble surface properties. Understanding their role in reducing induction time and increasing collision efficiency is key [17]. Furthermore, the roles of micro- and nanobubbles, as well as bulk and interfacial nanobubbles, in the context of particle–bubble interactions remain to be elucidated [18,19].
(2) Multi-Scale and Multi-Technique Characterization:
A holistic understanding requires correlating phenomena across scales. The integrated use of techniques such as high-speed video microscopy, AFM/force spectroscopy [4,20], and advanced spectroscopy is essential to bridge single-particle measurements with bulk process performance [21,22].
(3) High-Fidelity, Multi-Physics Computational Modeling:
The next generation of models must integrate population balance models (PBM) with advanced turbulence models and physics-based sub-models for attachment and detachment probabilities derived from fundamental measurements [23,24]. This will enable predictive “digital twins” of flotation cells.
(4) Intelligent and Sustainable Process Design:
The integration of machine learning and AI with online sensor data can optimize operations in real time [25,26]. Concurrently, developing novel, biodegradable collectors from renewable resources is crucial for sustainability [27].

3.2. Challenges

(1) Bridging the Scale Gap:
Translating nanoscale force measurements and microscale observations into reliable, predictive models for macroscale industrial performance remains a fundamental challenge [27]. The turbulent, swarm conditions in flotation cells differ vastly from static laboratory tests [28,29].
(2) Embracing System Complexity:
Real feeds are polydisperse, multi-mineral, and chemically complex. Modeling interactions in such heterogeneous systems, accounting for factors like surface roughness and dissolved ions, is immensely difficult [30,31].
(3) Limitations of Measurement Techniques:
While tools like AFM provide nanoscale insight, they are low-throughput and not suited for in situ measurement in flowing pulp [4]. Developing robust, real-time sensors for key parameters (e.g., induction time) is a significant hurdle.
(4) Practical Deployment of Advanced Systems:
Scaling up promising technologies like micro- and nanobubble generation faces practical barriers related to energy consumption and maintaining bubble dispersion stability in large tanks [32].
(5) Integration of Multi-Physics Phenomena:
Creating a truly predictive, first-principles model requires a simultaneous combination of turbulent multiphase flow, surface chemistry, and often electrochemistry—a formidable computational and theoretical challenge [14,33,34].

4. Conclusions

The articles in this Special Issue underscore a productive synergy between fundamental discovery and practical application. Cross-cutting themes include the critical importance of direct interfacial force measurement and modeling, the role of advanced computational techniques in elucidating complex hydrodynamics, and the persistent pursuit of chemical and mechanical innovation to overcome processing bottlenecks.
The path forward is unequivocally interdisciplinary, demanding collaboration between surface chemists, fluid dynamicists, process engineers, and data scientists. By leveraging several ideas—from smart bubbles and digital twins to AI-driven optimization—the flotation community can develop efficient, selective, and sustainable separation processes required in the 21st century.
We extend our gratitude to all contributors and reviewers for their essential role in shaping this Special Issue.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

List of Contributions

  • Batjargal, K.; Given, O.; Ozdemir, O.; Boylu, F.; Celik, M.S. Dependence of Bubble Size on Magnesite Flotation Recovery Using Sodium Oleate (NaOL) with Different Frothers. Minerals 2025, 15, 849. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15080849.
  • Bilgin, O.; Ehsani, I. A Study on the Beneficiation of Very Fine Particle Rutile Ore Using Flotation. Minerals 2025, 15, 838. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15080838.
  • Nicklas, J.; Heilmann, C.; Ditscherlein, L.; Peuker, U.A. Forces During the Film Drainage and Detachment of NMC and Spherical Graphite in Particle–Bubble Interactions Quantified by CP-AFM and Modeling to Understand the Salt Flotation of Battery Black Mass. Minerals 2025, 15, 809. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15080809.
  • Wang, J.; Lin, J.; Wang, J.; Mao, Y.; Chen, S.; Wang, G. Comparative Study of Particle-Resolved and Point-Particle Simulations of Particle–Bubble Collisions in Homogeneous Isotropic Turbulence. Minerals 2025, 15, 338. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15040338.
  • Han, D.; Shi, S.; Chen, S.; Hu, W.; Sun, C. An Investigation of the Impact of Altering the Contact Sequence Among Gas, Liquid, and Solid Phases on Mineral Floatability. Minerals 2025, 15, 306. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15030306.
  • Jiang, Y.; Sun, C.; Wang, P.; Kou, J. Atomized Reagent Addition with Synchronized Jet Pre-Mineralization to Enhance the Flotation Process: Study on Atomization Parameters and Mechanisms of Enhancement. Minerals 2024, 14, 1053. https://doi.org/10.3390/min14101053.

References

  1. Fuerstenau, M.C.; Jameson, G.J.; Yoon, R.H. Froth Flotation a Century of Innovation, 1st ed.; Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration: Littleton, CO, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  2. Zhou, R.; Li, X.; Li, D.; Wang, H.; Song, Z.; Yan, X.; Zhang, H. The effect of energy input on bubble-particle collision, attachment, detachment, and collection efficiencies in a mechanical flotation cell. Powder Technol. 2025, 453, 120659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chipili, C.; Bhondayi, C. The role of the pulp-froth interface on particle detachment and selectivity. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2021, 287, 102296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhou, B.; Gui, X.; Zhao, X.; Li, Z.; Yang, X.; Wang, L.; Liu, Q.; Xing, Y. Advancements and prospects in measurement methods for bubble-particle interaction forces in mineral flotation. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2026, 156, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Xing, Y.; Gui, X.; Cao, Y. Effect of bubble size on bubble-particle attachment and film drainage kinetics—A theoretical study. Powder Technol. 2017, 322, 140–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, J.; Lin, J.; Wang, J.; Mao, Y.; Chen, S.; Wang, G. Comparative study of particle-resolved and point-particle simulations of particle–bubble collisions in homogeneous isotropic turbulence. Minerals 2025, 15, 338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yang, X.; Chen, D.; Wang, Y.; Li, Z.; Xing, Y.; Gui, X. Direct numerical simulation study of multi-dispersed particle-bubble turbulent collision frequency based on the lattice boltzmann method. J. China Coal Cociety 2025, 50, 2692–2703. [Google Scholar]
  8. Tao, D. Recent advances in fundamentals and applications of nanobubble enhanced froth flotation: A review. Miner. Eng. 2022, 183, 107554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Nazari, S.; Zhou, S.; Hassanzadeh, A.; Li, J.; He, Y.; Bu, X.; Kowalczuk, P.B. Influence of operating parameters on nanobubble-assisted flotation of graphite. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2022, 20, 3891–3904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhou, S.; Gu, R.; Bu, X.; Alheshibri, M.; Xie, G. Aggregation behavior of fine quartz particles induced by bulk micro-nanobubbles: A fractal perspective. Miner. Eng. 2025, 234, 109671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhao, L.; Tang, D.; Liu, Q. Fundamental understandings of the limits in coarse particle flotation: A review. Miner. Eng. 2025, 232, 109487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sun, Z.; Li, X.; Zhao, S.; Zhong, T.; Wang, L.; Yan, X.; Zhang, H. Enhanced selective recovery of fine minerals in flotation by the oscillatory turbulence. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2025, 13, 115164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, E.; Lin, J.; Wang, S.; Wang, T.; Luo, K.; Fan, J. Numerical analysis of carbon dioxide mineralization process in a bubbling fluidized bed. Energy 2025, 339, 138913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zheng, G.; Nguyen, A.V.; Nguyen, T.A.H.; Nguyen, N.N.; Ma, L. Advancing models of bubble-particle contact times: A comprehensive review of flotation attachment efficiency prediction. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2025, 345, 103609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Chang, Z.; Niu, S.; Shen, Z.; Zou, L.; Wang, H. Latest advances and progress in the microbubble flotation of fine minerals: Microbubble preparation, equipment, and applications. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater. 2023, 30, 1244–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jia, M.; Farid, M.U.; Ho, Y.-W.; Ma, X.; Wong, P.W.; Nah, T.; He, Y.; Boey, M.W.; Lu, G.; Fang, J.K.-H.; et al. Advanced nanobubble flotation for enhanced removal of sub-10 µm microplastics from wastewater. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 9079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Qiao, B.; Wu, Z.; Huang, H.; Ran, J.; Ma, G.; Shao, H.; Tao, D. An investigation of nanobubble treatment on fine particle flotation and associated mechanisms. Green Smart Min. Eng. 2025, 2, 32–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhou, S.; Li, Y.; Nazari, S.; Bu, X.; Hassanzadeh, A.; Ni, C.; He, Y.; Xie, G. An assessment of the role of combined bulk micro- and nano-bubbles in quartz flotation. Minerals 2022, 12, 944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhou, S.; Bu, X.; Wang, X.; Ni, C.; Ma, G.; Sun, Y.; Xie, G.; Bilal, M.; Alheshibri, M.; Hassanzadeh, A.; et al. Effects of surface roughness on the hydrophilic particles-air bubble attachment. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2022, 18, 3884–3893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nicklas, J.; Ditscherlein, L.; Peuker, U.A. Particle–bubble interactions: An investigation of the three-phase contact line by atomic force microscopy. Langmuir 2023, 39, 13630–13640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Al-Zubeidi, A.; McCarthy, L.A.; Rafiei-Miandashti, A.; Heiderscheit, T.S.; Link, S. Single-particle scattering spectroscopy: Fundamentals and applications. Nanophotonics 2021, 10, 1621–1655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Shang, J.; Fan, J.; Qin, W.; Li, K. Single-Particle Measurements of Nanocatalysis with Dark-Field Microscopy. Catalysts 2022, 12, 764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, M.; Ni, C.; Bu, X.; Peng, Y.; Xie, G.; Tan, Z.; Yu, H. CFD-PBM simulation of the column flotation unit of FCMC: Importance of gas–liquid interphase forces models. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 2023, 101, 5925–5940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chu, X.; Liu, Y.; Liu Dong, Z.; Pan, C.; Qian, Y.; Yan, K.; Yang, G. Direct simulation of flow field around SUBOFF in grid-generated turbulence with SWLBM. Comput. Fluids 2023, 265, 106019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. El khediri, S.; Benfradj, A.; Thaljaoui, A.; Moulahi, T.; Khan, R.U.; Alabdulatif, A.; Lorenz, P. Integration of artificial intelligence (AI) with sensor networks: Trends, challenges, and future directions. J. King Saud Univ. Comput. Inf. Sci. 2024, 36, 101892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Szmigiel, A.; Apel, D.B.; Skrzypkowski, K.; Wojtecki, L.; Pu, Y. Advancements in machine learning for optimal performance in flotation processes: A review. Minerals 2024, 14, 331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Budemberg, G.; Jolsterå, R.; Karlkvist, T.; Chelgani, S.C. Shades of green: The path to flotation reagents development. Green Chem. 2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, D.; Liu, Q. Hydrodynamics of froth flotation and its effects on fine and ultrafine mineral particle flotation: A literature review. Miner. Eng. 2021, 173, 107220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wright, B.; Amani, P.; Galvin, K.; Firouzi, M. Mechanisms of gangue transport and recovery in Reflux flotation cells under varying bias flux and salinity conditions. Miner. Eng. 2025, 234, 109765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sun, Y.; Bu, X.; Ulusoy, U.; Guven, O.; Hassas, B.V.; Dong, X. Effect of surface roughness on particle-bubble interaction: A critical review. Miner. Eng. 2023, 201, 108223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gomez-Flores, A.; Bradford, S.A.; Hwang, G.; Heyes, G.W.; Kim, H. Particle–bubble interaction energies for particles with physical and chemical heterogeneities. Miner. Eng. 2020, 155, 106472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jia, J.; Zhu, Z.; Chen, H.; Pan, H.; Jiang, L.; Su, W.-H.; Chen, Q.; Tang, Y.; Pan, J.; Yu, K. Full life circle of micro-nano bubbles: Generation, characterization and applications. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 471, 144621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Shah, P.; Pahari, S.; Bhavsar, R.; Kwon, J.S.-I. Hybrid modeling of first-principles and machine learning: A step-by-step tutorial review for practical implementation. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2025, 194, 108926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Garcia-Villalba, M.; Colonius, T.; Desjardins, O.; Lucas, D.; Mani, A.; Marchisio, D.; Matar, O.K.; Picano, F.; Zaleski, S. Numerical methods for multiphase flows. Int. J. Multiph. Flow 2025, 191, 105285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, G.; Bu, X. Particle–Bubble Interactions in the Flotation Process. Minerals 2026, 16, 383. https://doi.org/10.3390/min16040383

AMA Style

Wang G, Bu X. Particle–Bubble Interactions in the Flotation Process. Minerals. 2026; 16(4):383. https://doi.org/10.3390/min16040383

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Guichao, and Xiangning Bu. 2026. "Particle–Bubble Interactions in the Flotation Process" Minerals 16, no. 4: 383. https://doi.org/10.3390/min16040383

APA Style

Wang, G., & Bu, X. (2026). Particle–Bubble Interactions in the Flotation Process. Minerals, 16(4), 383. https://doi.org/10.3390/min16040383

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop